Slashdot Mirror


California's "Wireless-Free" Zone

pangur writes: "In Wired, there's the story about how Arthur Firstenberg changed Mendocino, CA into a 'wireless-free zone' as a safehaven for those deemed 'electrically sensitive'. His critics claim that he is driving away any chance of a significant economy."

662 comments

  1. News flash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Flamebait

    Sensitive, luddite granola types spotted in California! Nose cut to spite face! News at 11:00!

    1. Re:News flash! by arkanes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll be damned, I grew up in Mendo. Everything you say is true :P.

    2. Re:News flash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...including a woman who appeared at one meeting wearing dark sunglasses and protective headgear

      Aluminum foil hat?

    3. Re:News flash! by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1

      Dont you know tinfoil hats dont protect against Agents who walk around with hand-held mind control devices? Tinfoil HOODS are the way to go now!

    4. Re:News flash! by shelby289 · · Score: 1

      And people wonder why California is called the Land of Fruits and NUTS.

      --
      This is the way the world ends, not with a bang , but a wimper
    5. Re:News flash! by jelle · · Score: 1

      &lt irony &gt I do close my eyes when a man in black holds up a pen in my face. &lt /irony &gt

      Hope these people realyze they shouldn't wear sneakers with the tinfoil hat, because sneakers isolate to ground, and when it's not grounded, the tinfoil hat won't do much more than a little bending of part of the field.

      Oh, and btw, did they ever check if the tinfoil did anything to block magnetic fields? FYI it doesn't, for that you need (expensive) low-mu materials.

      Do they know spark plugs in cars generate pulsing electric fields? Or are they conveniently insensitive to that type of electric field?

      Did they surrect a high perimeter fence yet to block terrestrial local television stations?

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    6. Re:News flash! by IronChef · · Score: 1


      That's just crazy talk from the HOOD CONTINGENT.

      The fact is that any oversized cap, such as a deerstalker with earflaps, will be perfectly effective when lined with the correct weight of foil.

      Your scaremongering about the ineffectiveness of foil hats marks you as a whacko and does a disservice to the thousands of people who RELY ON FOIL HEADGEAR DAILY.

    7. Re:News flash! by soybean · · Score: 1

      Well, I used to work at the Corners of the Mouth. There is no place in the world that atracts more of these typs there the Corners of the Mouth. (Actual address: Big Red Church, ukiah st, mendocino, ca)

    8. Re:News flash! by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Gasp! You probably know my mom! *has shopped at Corners many times* *now REALLY hates carob*

    9. Re:News flash! by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      What is so nutty about wanting to live in a pollution free environment?

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    10. Re:News flash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i guess they have no AM or FM radio where this guy lives either? hhaahhaah. (highly unlikely. HAM radio can go pretty far too...)

  2. Microwaving the Planet by rde · · Score: 5, Funny

    That book of his sounds interesting. Is there an electronic version available?

    1. Re:Microwaving the Planet by linzeal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is a good synopsis.

    2. Re:Microwaving the Planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No dude, it's, like, CA. Make that "way baked".

    3. Re:Microwaving the Planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is this funny you stupid moderator? guys stop this moderating system i cant read anymore stupid posts marked as informative coz i know they`re just assholes looking for a mod point

    4. Re:Microwaving the Planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm beaming it to you now, don't you hear it?

  3. I am the man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goooooooooooooo... www.yellow5.com/pokey/

  4. They already have this. by Heem · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There already is an area like this, It's called the Amish Country, Pennsylvania Dutch, etc. Seriously. The article describes being bothered by anything electronic, ranging from radio waves to hairdryers. May as well go back to the horse and buggy.

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
    1. Re:They already have this. by SComps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given this whole scenario the gentleman in the article describes himself has having a large "bevy" devices in his possession when he roams to San Franciso. Is he doing this on his horse or is he using his automobile which generates high voltage to make a spark, and lots of EMI from all those sensors talking to the cars computer? Personally I think the guys a whacko and probably would be thrown out of Amish country for being just a tad too conservative and holding them back!

    2. Re:They already have this. by Monte · · Score: 1

      There already is an area like this, It's called the Amish Country, Pennsylvania Dutch, etc.

      Actually the Amish have been using cell phones for a while now.

    3. Re:They already have this. by Delphis · · Score: 1

      Yea, at least I've seen Amish people with cell phones.

      Go figure.

      --
      Delphis
    4. Re:They already have this. by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3, Interesting
      There already is an area like this, It's called the Amish Country, Pennsylvania Dutch, etc

      The only problem with "Amish Country" is that it definitely isn't devoid of electronic signals. There are all kinds of radio stations in the area, and almost all of the tourists carry cell phones, so there are plenty of cells spitting out a signal.

      Personally, I think that if this is such a problem for all these people, they should all just get together and go buy an island somewhere so they can leave the rest of the world alone. I really resent some nut who moves into a town and expects the whole town to bow to his every wacked out whim.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    5. Re:They already have this. by jci · · Score: 1

      Well Mendocino and its surrounding areas already has its own currency named SEED, for
      Self-sufficient Ecological Economic Development.

      A SEED is $10, and stands for one hour of labor, raising their minimum wage. From what I read in econ, the stores that support this still pay for tax in the normal dollar.

      The idea behind it is to keep money from leaving their community, but this too makes them seem like they are going towards their own island without even leaving...

    6. Re:They already have this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The logic is that it is not "connected" to the outside world.

      Another solution to phones (they are "emergency equipment out in the country) is putting the phone, with an answering machine, in the outhouse.

      you were going there anyway....

    7. Re:They already have this. by LordBhaal · · Score: 0

      Actually, you've probably seen Mennonites (sp?) with Cell Phones.

  5. other things by commonchaos · · Score: 1

    The problem with this is that alot of things other than 802.11b and cell phones give off radiation... radios, cordless phones, microwave towers. Wonder how they will get around that.

    1. Re:other things by arkanes · · Score: 2

      The same people mentioned in the article also have managed to keep cell towers from being put up - thus, no one in the area has a cell phone. They also are lobbying to have the radio tower at the local high school shut down. (Apparently, KPFA over the hill in Booneville is okay, however)

    2. Re:other things by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      So does granite.

      I wonder how they get around that.

    3. Re:other things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to be funny, or are you just a stupid dickhead?

    4. Re:other things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do believe that your post will go into my quotefile. :-)

    5. Re:other things by PZMyers · · Score: 1
      The problem with this is that alot of things other than 802.11b and cell phones give off radiation... radios, cordless phones, microwave towers.
      Yeah, like the sun. And wood fires.
      Wonder how they will get around that.
      Live in a cold, dark cave? Ooops. I forgot. Granite emits radiation, too.
    6. Re:other things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      riiight. The sun "cooks" skin cells. That's what a tan is.

      Your CRT puts off the same amount of radiation, just in much smaller doses..

      OMG, You're a hypocrite!

      I find it laughable that someone's mouse burns them.. the monitor, among other things, use and put out much more radiation.

      Monitor tan anyone?

    7. Re:other things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well, they'll have fun trying to shut down the radio station. The FCC can notify the US Attorney that they're attempting to interfere with the operation of a Federally-licensed radio station, and have the Feds (e.g., FBI and/or US Marshalls) come in.

      In one of the other comments, someone mentioned that these bozos tried to sue the FCC. One reason they probably lost the case (and no, I didn't chase the links to verify the text of the court decision) is that the FCC isn't responsible for that. The US Congress, by dint of passing the Communications Act of 1934 (and as subsequently amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996), stated that it (Congress) is going to regulate radio transmission and interstate telephone service. It's all codified in Title 47 of The United States Code. The FCC's Rules and Regulations which implement this mandate are codified in Title 47 of the Code Of Federal Regulations.

      That said, I'd love to bring my 47 CFR Part 97-licensed station in my vehicle into town and crank it up. We'll see how sensitive they are to 100W or so of HF RF :-)

      BTW, the IEEE also conducted a number of studies about 20 years ago concerning the medical effects of EHV power transmission lines, and apparently that amounted to nothing.

      So, if he wants to be free of RF, yep, pack him off to the NRAO site in WV, or maybe some rural part of Wyoming, Montana, or Alaska. The further he is from anything electrical, the better off we'll all be!

      BTW, has anyone tested the _water_ out there in Mendocino? I know Timothy Leary is Dead, but I wonder if his legacy lives on in their drinking water somehow...

    8. Re:other things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boonville! I can't believe my hometown was slashdotted! Well... sorta.

      Mr. A.V.H.S. '96

      -- by the way, its "Boonville," not "BoonEville" like that damned car.

    9. Re:other things by dnoyeb · · Score: 0

      Uhh, my mouse does not burn my hand. If you remember CRTs about 5 years ago started to do what they could to reduce their emissions. If no one said anything, they would NOT have done anything. The sun also causes cancer. AGain, the choice should be mine, the government should not (in a free country) force me to expose myself to something which for whatever hair brained reason I consider harmfull.

  6. mountain of cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would see where this could be someone's view of utopia - no wireless anything - but does indeed limit the economic basis of practically any MAbell or the like.

  7. Oh no! Certain doom! by edremy · · Score: 5, Funny
    Has anyone told these folks that they are constantly bathed in microwave radiation from the Big Bang?

    They should move to another universe, provided they aren't already living in one...

    Eric

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  8. Scoop is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This damn thing never works.

  9. 5 years from now: Studies prove that.. by bugg · · Score: 4, Funny
    Studies show that hypochrondia is being diagnosed in Mendocino, CA at a rate ten times the national average. Reduced levels of electromagnetic exposure is the prime suspect.

    Mendocino had been attracting thousands of people due to their reduced levels of EMF exposure. It now seems that these people may have been actually endangering their mental health.

    --
    -bugg
  10. Credible Studies? by jordan_a · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of any credible studies on the matter? There are plenty of rumours and beliefs on things like these, but I've never had any point to any real evidence. Not that I'm saying I don't think some people are sensitive, I just would like for something more then somebody claiming to have a headache when around cell phones.

    1. Re:Credible Studies? by mshomphe · · Score: 2

      More than likely these people are hypochondriacs. People will say they feel better in these 'wireless-free' areas for the same reason people prefer bottled water to tap water: 'placebo effect' or 'the power of suggestion'.

      --
      She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
    2. Re:Credible Studies? by Mondrames · · Score: 2, Funny

      Granted, but as a chronic kidney stone former, I prefer bottled or filtered water to the tap - I live in a so-called Kidney Stone belt due to levels of minerals and such in our drinking water...

      However I agree that Bob Evian is making a killing from the tap in his "Mountain" basement.

    3. Re:Credible Studies? by connorbd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hypochondria is one word for it... The thing is that a lot of these people don't want to hear that what they have is really a mental imbalance. I've heard of people with imagined skin parasites too -- they will go to the dermatologist, present no obvious symptoms, and simply do not wish to be told that what they really need is a mild antipsychotic.

      It's a bizarre situation. I feel safe in saying that these people's conditions are probably delusional; what has to be brought into account is that whether or not it's all in their heads, their suffering is certainly real. The problem is that they take any attempt to bridge the disconnect as a personal insult...

      /Brian

    4. Re:Credible Studies? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      People will say they feel better in these 'wireless-free' areas for the same reason people prefer bottled water to tap water: 'placebo effect' or 'the power of suggestion'.

      Hey, I drink bottled water, our tap water tastes like crap!

      I'm sure you meant to say "magnetized water" or "bottled water with silver colloidal suspension" or some other mumbo-jumbo water that isn't more expensive just for taste reasons.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    5. Re:Credible Studies? by cats-paw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is a VERY easy "condition" to test.

      I take the "patient" and put him or her in a shielded room so that the detectors all read 0.

      Naturally I have a partition in the room so that I can beam waves at the "patient" from the other side of the partition (the partition is also part of the shielded room) without their knowledge.

      Turn on the transmitter at random intervals and see if and, more importantly, when, they complain.

      --
      Absolute statements are never true
    6. Re:Credible Studies? by alecks · · Score: 1

      you really think this huge ammount of wave shit waving through us constantly has no effect on you?

    7. Re:Credible Studies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to live in Adrian, MI. Adrian is a few miles south of the Raisin River water treatment plant. All tap water in that town tastes like pool water. I dare you to drink some and tell me that it's the "power of suggestion" that makes me think it's heavily chlorinated.

    8. Re:Credible Studies? by bwalling · · Score: 1

      prefer bottled water to tap water

      Apparently, you have good tap water. Where I live (Pinellas County, FL), we have no water supply of our own. We have to buy it from other areas, and somehow or another, when it gets here, it tastes like crap. If I chill it down to near freezing, it tastes somewhat okay. Mostly, it just tastes like crap.

    9. Re:Credible Studies? by Tassach · · Score: 3
      More than likely these people are hypochondriacs


      Or just credulous fools of the same variety who believe newspaper horoscopes, consult telephone "psychics", or subscribe to any other of a million pseudo-scientific and superstitious belief systems.



      Critical thinking should be a required subject from elementary school on up; Carl Sagan's The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark should be required reading for all high school students.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    10. Re:Credible Studies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contact your local association for electrisensitive people.

      The international section of swedish one might
      be a start.
      FEB International

      For those in Sweden:
      www.feb.se

    11. Re:Credible Studies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > you really think this huge ammount of wave shit waving through us constantly has no effect on you?

      Well, when you've phrased that so accurately, how can anyone disagree?

    12. Re:Credible Studies? by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

      > you really think this huge ammount of wave shit waving through us constantly has no effect on you?

      I do think it has an effect on me. However, the question is whether all of the unnaturally occurring radiation has any different or more deleterious effect on me than all of the naturally occurring wave shit waving through me.

      Virg

    13. Re:Credible Studies? by gaudior · · Score: 1

      Kidney stones are measurable. 'Tiredness' is not. Good luck on the stones, man. It's not fun.

    14. Re:Credible Studies? by mshomphe · · Score: 2

      I totally agree with you. I just couldn't find a way to fit in a good James Randi rant...

      --
      She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
    15. Re:Credible Studies? by mshomphe · · Score: 2

      Listen, no doubt there is some tap water that's crappy. I used to live near Woburn, MA (A Civil Action). The study I was referring to was when they put tap water in cups labeled "bottled water" (like Dasani or something) and "tap water". Then the subjects were asked for a taste comparison between the two. Lo and behold, people thought the "bottled water" tasted better. It's a well-known psychological phenomenon.

      --
      She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
    16. Re:Credible Studies? by raoulortega · · Score: 1

      consult telephone "psychics"

      Not for long-- 1-900 Numbers Going AT&T-away

    17. Re:Credible Studies? by SirNonya · · Score: 1

      One thing that needs to be mentioned, IMO, is that it might take some time for them to get a headache. It might be a few minutes, a half hour, a few hours, or it might start affecting them after a few days. They might stay in your shielded room and complain after two hours, and it could be them walking under the powerline.

      ~SirN0nya

  11. Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not surprising this is coming out of California.

  12. Mendocino is wacky by linzeal · · Score: 1

    Patchoulii soaked hippy chicks and dried up 1960's student revolutionaries selling seashells on the seashore. Its like carefree/cavecreek in arizona and I'm sure a thousand other places where the washed up of bygone generations coagulate like chum in a bucket.

  13. waves by joshuaos · · Score: 2, Informative
    Is there no electricity in Mendicino? I mean, I know there are lots of stoners, but is there no radio signals or microwaves? Can I not get any TV channels at all with my antenna there?

    I would certainly be the first to admit that all these waves that we've been sending out and bouncing around for about the last hundred odd years could be harmful. Hell, I'm not even sure that it would surprise me. But I know there are great benefits to wireless networking (not to mention electricity), and good luck getting entirely away from signals and waves. Go to some third world underdeveloped country if you must, cause I don't think you're going to find it here.

    Also, the very important point that what if some others in Mendicino like thier radio waves. I would certainly not want to see this guy's problem inflicted on everyone else in this community.

    Cheers, Joshua

    --

    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!

    1. Re:waves by nanojath · · Score: 2

      More to the point, are they gonna put up a big lead roof over the whole county? Just because there are no cell-phones in town, doesn't mean they aren't getting hammered by signals from sattelites, television stations, radio stations, power lines...

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    2. Re:waves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      waves and microwaves are different stupid asshole read the shit again before running your geeky mouth you skinny piece of shit

  14. Electrically Sensitive? by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I must be electrically sensitive too, because every time I put a fork on the wall socket I also get a "Burning pain" and "Electric shocks".

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Electrically Sensitive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You too? You know, I once went unconsious from doing this. I think unconsiousness is a symptom too ...

    2. Re:Electrically Sensitive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      geek humor sucks, did you expect thit to be modded funny?

    3. Re:Electrically Sensitive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it worked didn't it?!

    4. Re:Electrically Sensitive? by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good enough reason to have an ordinance that banned wall sockets, and a class action suit against those that manufacture them for marketing a dangerous item.

      -

    5. Re:Electrically Sensitive? by Jester998 · · Score: 1

      Apparently a reduction in learning ability is also a symptom of electrical sensitivity... you'd think you'd learn to avoid putting the fork in a socket after the first time... ;/

    6. Re:Electrically Sensitive? by Talkischeap · · Score: 1

      You need to hold it there MUCH longer...

      --
      If it don't GO... chrome it. ~ Frank Banks
    7. Re:Electrically Sensitive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would be like trying to sue a gun company. they will point their fingers at the people who make the bullets, because the bullets are where the actual potential energy is stored. in your case, instead of going after the people who make wall sockets, go after the power companies who "make" the power. (We could use some money back from them from everything they stole a year ago during the big "power crisis")

    8. Re:Electrically Sensitive? by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      Yeah, don't ya just hate when that happens?

      I rate your post a 6!

  15. Microwaving the Planet by solarce · · Score: 2, Funny

    That must take on hell of a large microwave, and what setting would you use? "Half-Baked"

    --
    Is a Sig really an expression of the person behind the post or just random nonsense?
  16. tin foil hats - the only solution by ajm · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's worked for kooks for many, many years. In fact, you might say it's a "proven" solution to the problems of wireless interference with your brain waves, at least to the same extent that it's been "proven" that wireless hurts your head!

    1. Re:tin foil hats - the only solution by NEC9502 · · Score: 1

      Durnitt!! And here I was starting to pack so I could open a roadside stand selling that very thing; along with solar hair dryers and sound powered phones. . .

    2. Re:tin foil hats - the only solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tin foil hats are soo declasse'

      you can get stylish emf shielding baseball caps at
      http://lessemf.com/personal.html

      no, I am not kidding

  17. Sorry, you can be hypochondriatic somewhere else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How in the world can you become allergic to electronic devices? Electricity flows through us and binds us.

    Living without lights, phones, radios, or any other modern conveniences is going to suck for Mendocino residents.

    Oh, they're only getting rid of cell phones? I see now... They are Luddite Nazis.

  18. Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by Infonaut · · Score: 5, Funny
    it's called marijuana. When you're high all the time, who needs wireless acceess?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I do! And about 1/3 - 1/4 of the other Slashdotters I'd imagine...

    2. Re:Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by QuietRiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm there. Unix when you're high is a treat. Playing with my FreeBSD box after a bowl or two is a great way to satiate either the anti-social [sit there in front of your computer for hours without having to talk to anybody] or super-social [email, and lots of it] person you may become. While there are many other things I can enjoy under the influence, unix is a treat for me.

      I love to build - and I especially like to be crafty and work with my hands after a nice J with some friends. I like to build, fix, and create. And while marijuana can make you pretty spacy, it often helps me to concentrate - and become less distractable than I usually am. I can give myself a little project, or part of a big one, and just go at it.

      The slight change in perspective at the command line can be a benefit too. Seeing problems and relations between system resources in a different way can help anyone become a better sysadmin or to better solve problems that may develop. Stepping off your own beaten path can lead to shortcuts and enlightenment. You may realize you've been taking the long way home on a simple function you've been performing for years. A chance to explore - that's what it's really all about.

      While I don't suggest relying on yourself when you're very high or whipping out a J at work - if you never use your computer when you smoke - or if you used to smoke long ago, but haven't in a while ... well - give it a shot. Explore. If it doesn't work for you... well, you probably haven't lost much. And it's pretty hard to experiment without learning _something_ right?

      Just remember to dose yoruself properly. Don't do too much - or you'll just stare at your screen and call me crazy. Use your command history - and keep an editor window open to jot down ideas or help you remember what you've done. [Short term memory IS affected - so compensate!]

      Experiment. You're bound to learn _something_

    3. Re:Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mixing up Mendocino, the city, with Mendocino, the county. I don't doubt that marijuana is cultivated (and smoked) in Mendocino, the city, but it is Mendocino county which is infamous for marijuana cultivation.

    4. Re:Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by jred · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's *exactly* when you need wireless access. Surely you don't mean to get up off the couch:) I drape cat5 across the living room floor, but I always end up forgetting it's there when I go to the kitchen for more gnoshies, and trip over it.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    5. Re:Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Kant tipe writ. we're send>? there.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    6. Re:Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> When you're high all the time

      Hmmm, kinda sounds like slashdot!

    7. Re:Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by Matt · · Score: 1
      You are mixing up Mendocino, the city, with Mendocino, the county. I don't doubt that marijuana is cultivated (and smoked) in Mendocino, the city, but it is Mendocino county which is infamous for marijuana cultivation.
      One of my friends who used to live near Sacramento told me that marajuana grows in the cracks in the sidewalk, it's so common. There and in neighboring Humbolt county.
    8. Re:Mendocino has a thriving "offline" economy by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Your friends are pulling your leg, it's kansas where it grows wild. However, it IS so common that pot considered primo stuff in southern california gets thrown away (by the garbage bag) there. There's a fair amount of usage in Mendocino, the town (not city), but theres little or no cultivation. All the real cultivation is done in Humboldt, mainly on the state parks. Small scale growing is done on GP land, usually in smaller outlying areas like Albion and Comptche.

  19. Seriously by ender-iii · · Score: 1

    Was this just posted so people could flame them? Cause you know damn well no one reading this would agree with it.

    --
    ender-iii
    1. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Slashdot is poserpalace. These people post without any reason, they just seem to be looking for mod points, and the discussions here are just poser issues waiting to be flamed.

      I read the urls of news just to see what's up today, these discussions lead you nowhere.

      PS >> By the ammount of time these people spend here i'd say most are unemployed geeky weeners.

  20. You have got to be fucking kidding me... by nigelc · · Score: 1
    IMNSHO follows: I'm sorry, but this is ludicrous. It is a remarkable insight into modern small-time America that this nut could affect the world around him, as opposed to being laughed out of town.

    Are we now in an America where everyone is allergic to something? This is the logical end of the progression that started with "nut allergies" and "perfume allergies"; can you say psychosomatic? I knew you could.

    What's next? RMS claiming that he's allergic/sensitive to Windows?

    --


    Cthulhu Barata Nikto
    1. Re:You have got to be fucking kidding me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm alergic to the nuts in california. Every time I hear about them I break out into hives :)

    2. Re:You have got to be fucking kidding me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you saying that if I go into anaphylactic shock and die, it's all psychosomatic?

    3. Re:You have got to be fucking kidding me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes, yes.

    4. Re:You have got to be fucking kidding me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ludicrous as it is, this does not surprise me in the least. Remember, this is a small town in northern California, and it's not that far from Berkeley (where I grew up -- it's about a four-hour drive if I recall correctly).

      California in general, and the northern half of the state in particular, is home to some of the oddest ideas I've ever seen, and this one is no exception. In fact, the idea of remote electrical "mind control" by the CIA, or the intelligence agency du'jour (sp?) is thought to have spawned those tin-foil hats you see some very paranoid people wearing.

      My big concern is that this nut case is setting some really bad precedents. Who's he going to go after next? Owners of ham radio antennas? Maybe the CHP, county sheriff, or fire department for their local radio towers, the presence and use of which just happen to be critical to public safety? How about those Evil High-Tension Power Lines that are everywhere?

      I personally don't know ANYone who's ever gotten sick just from being around EM fields, and I've been in the (electronics/RF) industry for 20+ years, and a ham radio licensee for longer than that. If this fruit-loop wants to turn Mendocino into an Amish-type community, he should just come out and say that's what he wants to do. That way, folks who don't want any part of it can either mount a counter-campaign to neutralize his FUD, or just move away.

    5. Re:You have got to be fucking kidding me... by ChannelX · · Score: 1
      uh....allergies to all sorts of things are a complete reality. not sure what world you're living in but count yourself lucky if you dont have any allergies. I am one of those people that you think is psychosomatic....I have alleries to perfume. I didnt have allergies as a kid....they started when i was an adult and I dont have any particular like/dislike for perfume in general. some will cause me to have allergic reactions including breathing problems.


      as to nut allergies it is possible for someone to die from eating something that even has a tiny bit of nuts in it. it is not quackery. not any less dangerous than bee stings to people who are allergic to them.


      if you ever had the shit scared out of you because of a severe allergic reaction you wouldnt be spouting your nonsense.

      --
      My blog: http://jkratz.dyndns.org/~jason/blog/
    6. Re:You have got to be fucking kidding me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my relatives has problems breathing (asthma) when exposed to musk perfume. Other types of perfume aren't a problem. I'm not sure if it is an allergic or pschosomatic reaction. Asthma is often associated with psychological triggers. It can still kill you or put you in the hospital.

  21. So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Restil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and how is this accomplished exactly? What credible research shows that one person is more likely to be affected by radio waves then someone else. Does this also mean that there are no TV broadcasts, no radio broadcasts, no police radios, no satellite reception. I mean... if you're going to cut one source of RF, you better cut it all, just to be on the safe side.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
    1. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Algorithm+wrangler · · Score: 5, Informative

      At the university I attended the department of telecommunications (!) did a very simple experiment in this field: They found 20 people who (according to themselves) were very plagued by electrical sensitivity - in particular high-voltage power lines. They were then put - one bye one - into a grounded magnetically shielded room where the only source of electrical or magnetic fields was a high-voltage power line running below the ceiling. Then the power (1 kV 50 Hz) was turned randomly on and off, and the participants were then to give a sign through a window when they "felt" the power coming on - after all they were supposed to be sensitive to this. However the study found no correllation between the power going on and off and the signs that the subjects gave. Not even for one single subject. The study concluded that the only problem for these people was a too lively imagination.

      --
      -._''_.-
    2. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by cgleba · · Score: 2

      Perhaps his political opponets should do the same to him. Lock him in a room and see if he can actually "feel the waves". That will take a lot of credability off of his argument.

      The reason I'm lobbying so hard to stop the expansion of wireless facilities all over the country is because I firmly believe this is affecting the health of the nation," said Firstenberg, who graduated from Cornell University with a degree in mathematics and a minor in physics.

      Perhaps he should have made that minor in physics a major and minored in the medical field instead. . .

      Btw, Art, I'll decide if the "waves" hurt me, you don't have to "save the nation" for us. ..

    3. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the results of this experiment online anywhere?

      I'm trying to come up with a list of real scientific experiments on electo-sensitivity, but most of the stuff I've found is from either people who claim they have it, or from people trying to sell those people something, neither of which are particularly independent observers.

      The study you refer to would be a good example of what I'm looking for.

    4. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Wntrmute · · Score: 2

      I had the same thought, and was also reminded of James Randi's challenge to an alleged aura-seer:

      http://skepdic.com/auras.html

    5. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by ruvreve · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they hear the buzz when you turned on the high-voltage power line? Or maybe I'm the only person that can hear/feel it.....

    6. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Algorithm+wrangler · · Score: 1

      Apparently no. I must say that I'm not an expert on how power lines behave indoor, but I would suspect that there is not much buzz unless you either can hear the transformer or is outdoor with a high air humidity.

      --
      -._''_.-
    7. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Cerrian · · Score: 1

      The test might not show them to be sensitive to electrical/magnetic fields, but that doesn't mean that these people are having some kind of symptons. Its been documented before that persons with strong physcological (sp??) reactions/emotions do exhibit physical reactions on their bodies.

      So it wouldn't suprise me that if you whipped out your pda (without batteries) some poor bastard would go into convulsions upon seeing it.

    8. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by parliboy · · Score: 1

      While I'm not electronically sensitive in the general, I am aurally sensitive to certain things. Cathode Ray Tubes are the most common problem, along with some older kitchen appliances and air conditioners. In this office systems class (education major) I'm in right now, there's about two dozen older 15" monitors and I have a HUGE HUGE ringing in my ears.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    9. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by rekoil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A good folloup test would be to do the same experiment, but with the addition of a speaker that emitted a "buzz" that sounds like the humming of a transformer, or some other stimuli that the subject should interpret as a sign of existence of the flowing current - nothing too overt; a "power on" light in the room might be a interpreted as easily spoofable. The key is to make the subject believe that the juice is flowing independent of whether or not it actually is.

      Turn said stimuli on and off in a pattern completely unrelated to the actual activation/deactivation of the current. See if the subject reponds to the stimuli pattern instead of the actual current flow. I'll betcha they do.

    10. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

      Consider also the fact that the high-tension power lines you're thinking about (usually up on metal lattice towers) are 69kv to 345kv (at least, in the U.S.), and you can really only hear them on humid days. (I grew up in Houston; when I say "humid," I mean 95% and up).

      Even the power lines that are strung on wooden poles (like you might have behind your house) are 12kv (or, on rare occasion, 24kv), and I've never heard them buzz.

      1kv is absolutely not going to buzz.

    11. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      Not that I buy into this stuff, but it occurs to me that an experiment like that is fairly simplistic. Try putting subjects into a room to see if they can detect the presence or absence of vitamin C -- do your results call scurvy into question?

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    12. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should frequently go to loud rock concerts and techno/industrial/goth dance clubs. That should cure your "problem" (really good hearing) fairly quickly... As a fringe benefit, if you're good looking, you might get to bang hot gothy jailbait...

    13. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      Not that I buy into this stuff, but it occurs to me that an experiment like that is fairly simplistic. Try putting subjects into a room to see if they can detect the presence or absence of vitamin C -- do your results call scurvy into question?

      The difference is that these people claim to be able to detect the (immediate) presence or absence of electromagnetic fields.

      I make no claims of being able to detect whether my orange juice really contains vitamin C by tasting it.

    14. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was this ever published?
      It should be.

    15. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      Perhaps he should have made that minor in physics a major and minored in the medical field instead.

      Hrm, from page 2 of the wired article:
      "Firstenberg says he became electrically sensitive in 1982 as a pre-med student at the University of California at Irvine, after he received more than 40 dental X-rays. One day he collapsed on the hospital floor with heart pains and subsequently he lost 15 pounds in two weeks. He also grew short of breath around electrical equipment. Finally he dropped out of med school and moved to the "clean environment" of Mendocino.

      Looks like he sort of tried that route already...

      - A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.
      - AC
    16. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by wbajzek · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've got a slight case of tinnitis and I became "sensitive" to TV tubes and light bulbs and stuff when it started... It was particularly bad when I listened to a lot of heavy metal in high school, I used to turn off the kitchen light at my house because it irritated me... I don't think that it was because of having abnormally acute high frequency hearing considering how I abused my ears back then.

      After I figured out what was going on, I started taking care of my ears after that and they recovered almost fully, aside from a quiet ringing. However, recently I was at a friend's place, and she has one of those "spider repelling" electronic devices, which made a really irritating chirping sound that drove me nuts but was inaudible to the other people present, who all have fine hearing.

      It seems most likely to me that it's something like the extra high frequencies inside my head are reinforcing the ones put off by the light bulb to the point where it's noticeable.

    17. Re:So who is DEEMED electrically sensitive.. by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      Yes, that's true in this case, and I assume was true in the case of your experiment, but that doesn't rule out the possibility that others are sensitive, or that these folks are but exagerate the immediacy of it. Just because my premonitions of a bus crash are hogwash doesn't mean that I'm immune to that Flxible bearing down on me, and CO can kill me just as dead even though I can't smell it. :)

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  22. Sounds like by wiredog · · Score: 2

    Some of "the town's 1,000-odd residents" are pretty odd indeed.

    1. Re:Sounds like by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      1000 odd residents, and a few who aren't?

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    2. Re:Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when was 1,000 an odd number?
      i'm so confused.

  23. Pure unadulterated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit, individuals who exhibit this type of problem are not SURVIVAL types. I say let them die like the freaks they are...or get an aluminium reflector beanie!

  24. hmmm by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

    from the article:
    "People vary in their sensitivity to EMFs, and up to 20% of the population (according to Swedish research) can become electrically sensitive."

    Damn, no TVs, VCRs, video games, Microwaves, phones, powerlines, hair dryers, etc. for 20%!!!!! That's like 1/5th of the population. That would really suck. This sounds to me like a simple ploy. People like this guy are always up to something, and that is usually no good. For what it's worth, you can always find stats to prove what ever you want.

    Call me skeptical, but this is PR BullSh!t.

    Besides, wouldn't they be ok if they wore the static guards used for working on computer equipment?

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever been shocked by a doorknob? Yes?

      You are electrically sensitive. QED.

      These are the same people who think they have psychic abilities because streetlights turn on and off occasionally when they walk by.

    2. Re:hmmm by Mr_Matt · · Score: 2

      Besides, wouldn't they be ok if they wore the static guards used for working on computer equipment?

      Static guards, feh. These guys need the Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanies to solve their real problem - being brainwashed hypochondriacs. :)

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    3. Re:hmmm by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Most of the stats look to be from soviet era from eastern europe. Back then you could geyt (sic) those scientists to say pretty much anything when scientific findings that did not fit into communist doctrine were discounted, buried, or refuted with the flimsiest of evidence. Perhaps many of these studies were ploys to use against a massive semi-educated agrarian population that in the 1970's still did not have electricity in some areas.

    4. Re:hmmm by rapid+prototype · · Score: 0

      or doors just open when they get close to them at the supermarket. how weird is that?

      -rp

      ps - for some reason, every time i get out of my car lately i get zapped as soon as i touch the outside of the car. i mean POW a big zap. it is starting to piss me off after like four months of it.

    5. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've started letting my wife get out of the car first to discharge the static electricity from the car. I haven't had a problem since the beginning of winter. :-)

  25. The list of things that cause the symptoms. by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Informative

    The following can provoke symptoms:

    Laptop computers using their mains adapters Computer monitors (VDTs, VDUs) Televisions Mobile phones Fluorescent lights Pylons, substations Electric fields due to house wiring Electrical 'noise' in trains, buses and cars Battery-operated appliances Telephones, answering machines and faxes Refrigerators, freezers, electric cookers, vacuum cleaners etc. Fire alarms and burglar alarms Underground electric cables Hearing-aid induction loops


    If the "electrically sensitive" people can't be near any of those, they might as well become Amish...

    -- Dr. Eldarion --

    1. Re:The list of things that cause the symptoms. by kawaichan · · Score: 1

      Although I am not Amish myself but I am pretty sure that they have computers theses days too.

      may be they should live under a rock, that might help.

      --

      kawai
    2. Re:The list of things that cause the symptoms. by Garfunkel · · Score: 1

      I have lots of Amish relatives. They most certainly don't have computers. Their houses don't have electricty. Unless of course you know of some kerosene powered computers?

      --
      -jay
    3. Re:The list of things that cause the symptoms. by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1
      There are other sects which look Amish, but are not ... e.g. lots of Mennonites here in Ohio, with the big beards and the simple clothing. They drive cars and use other more modern stuff.

      On the other hand, I'm sure ol' Abe Yoder and his Amish kin could give the Mendocino weed merchants some tips on 'natural cultivation' techniques...

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    4. Re:The list of things that cause the symptoms. by biohazard99 · · Score: 1

      No but there are probably 3 jackasses running 300Mhz celerons at 923Mhz with a Kerosene coolant system for their PC's

    5. Re:The list of things that cause the symptoms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there are those new methenol powered fuel cells...

  26. Wireless Free Zone? by mprindle · · Score: 2

    How can one make a zone wireless free? From the article it seems that they are worried about the radio emissions from radio and other devices. Just because they have that small area where no cell phone towers exist, it doesn't mean that there are no radio waves in the area. If humans could see the radio waves it would totally freak us out since there is SO much out there. Just think of how many waves are out there just for your local TV and radio stations.

    1. Re:Wireless Free Zone? by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      And considering "radio waves" are just EM waves.... They better call Monty Burns to come block out the Sun, and all other sources of light.

      And candles are definitely verboten. Only a life of total EM darkness will be safe for these people.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Wireless Free Zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can one make a zone wireless free?

      By putting wires in it, of course.

  27. Oh Please! by billmaly · · Score: 2

    Hypochondria run amok! I'd be interested in knowing what other "conditions" these people have suffered from in the past.

    Although, this would explain the feeling of dread and nausea I get when cell phone caller ID displays my boss calling.

  28. The only thing this guy is missing ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... is the aluminum-foil-covered hat to keep out the CIA mind control rays. There has never been a single piece of hard evidence for low-intensity radio waves causing the symptoms he and others describe. Considering how long radio-based devices have been in common use (just over a century) it's very hard to believe that this is real.

    In fact, it sounds to me like classic mass hysteria, which (unfortunately) is a well-documented medical phenomenon. If this guy and his buddies are looking for a place to live that will satisfy their needs, may I suggest Salem, Mass.?

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by Ioldanach · · Score: 1

      If this guy and his buddies are looking for a place to live that will satisfy their needs, may I suggest Salem, Mass.?


      Oh, please, not again! I think they've had their quota for the next few centuries, don't you? :)
    2. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not missing the hats. From the article:

      ...a woman who appeared at one meeting wearing dark sunglasses and protective headgear to ward off stray signals

      I'm sure the writer just couldn't bring himself to commit the words "tinfoil hat" to paper.

    3. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by loydcc · · Score: 1

      I live in Salem, MA. The place is constantly bathed in Electromagnetic waves. And what most people don't realize is we have a substantial pleasure boating industry. So at any given moment we get radar from boaters that would just KILL the folks in Mendocino outright. We're also the home of several toxic waste dumps from the ammunition dump at the Winter Island Seaplane Base to several abandonned tanneries.

    4. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is VERY unscientific to ward something off because it sounds ludecrious to you at the momment.

      Facts:

      o Electromagnetic fields cannot be avoided, since they protrude the universe.

      o We have been experiencing extreme conditions them during a generation.

      o MOST people do NOT have a problem.

      o SOME people MAY experience problems.

      So, you investigate those people. This is how science works. How do you expect to solve problems if you refuse to identify possible symptoms?

      /Jan

    5. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by jht · · Score: 2

      Please, no! I live and work in Salem, and the last thing I need is someone like him getting on my case about my hacked-up AirPort Base Station!

      Though now that I think about it, if he's that sensitive inviting him to my house should help take care of the problem...

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    6. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      o MOST people do NOT have a problem. o SOME people MAY experience problems. And these evolutionarily unfit people will breed less, and soon there won't be a problem.

    7. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      These people do exist, though. There's one fellow who comes to the Kmart where I work occasionally who is rather indignant about the bigscreen TV behind the service desk that shows continuous advertisements and things; he says it makes him sick, and he has to make a wide loop around it when he comes in or out.

      The human body is an amazing and wonderful thing, and our medicine isn't even close to understanding it fully. If we can be sickened by large doses of radiation, who's to say some among us can't be sickened by smaller ones?

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    8. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by e-gold · · Score: 1

      Someone may have beaten me to this, but,

      "It can't be stressed enough how important it is to have the shiny side pointing out."
      JMR

      Speaking exclusively for Jim Ray, YMMV, etc.

      --
      Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
    9. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by oldmildog · · Score: 1

      Mass hysteria? Dogs and cats... living together?

      --
      They have the Internet on computers now?
    10. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by PD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed. Who's to say that some among us can't be sickened by:

      1) small doses of fluoride in the water
      2) small doses of iron in the water
      3) small doses of radiation from smoke detectors
      4) small doses of nutrasweet
      5) small doses of saccharin
      6) small doses of psychic energy
      7) small needles inserted into energy points in the body
      8) small amounts of chemicals emitted by menstruating women
      9) small amounts of pig sweat in perfumes
      10) extremely large amounts of staph bacteria on everything we touch
      11) etc.

      The answer to your question "who's to say that some among us can't be sickened by smaller ones?" is ME. It's called the burden of proof. The person making the claim needs to provide the evidence. Without evidence the rational position to take is "I don't believe it. Prove it."

    11. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      EM radiation is not the same as being bombarded by large numbers of gamma rays, so your comparison is more than slightly silly.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    12. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And masshysteria ? With sympthoms ? Tests? Mask-cells? You americans must be lagging behind,
      its proved in Sweden that electricty does certain
      things to human body and the human body starts
      producing maskcells, etc.

      And microwaves are proven dangerous, and are even
      used in warfare.

    13. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      People who get sick watching television are suffering from one of two conditions. Sensitivity to the 60hz flickering (Same with most flourescent bulbs) Or from motion sickness from seeing motion on the TV but not feeling it in theie ears. It has NOTHING to do with EMR...

      People that see such crack pot statements as this guys then think "Oh my mother had that, she got sick watching TV, it must be true" are guilty of the WORST form of insanity, complete lack of rational thought.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    14. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by scoove · · Score: 4, Funny

      No kidding... we've got a weather spotter affectionally known as Tornado Tim in our parts (we're about as far away from an ocean as you can get) who mounted one of those boat radar systems on the top of his beat up Nissan pickup.

      Even the hams who play with RF all the time walk in a big circle to avoid his truck...

      *scoove*

    15. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by loydcc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes exactly my point. Some of the marine radar setups are based on the same technology that caused all those state troopers to go sterile. Now on a sailboat 30 feet up the mast these pose no threat but on the roof a Nissan truck it's about 2 feet from the guys head. I'm not big on power boats but I think the rule of thumb is to put them on a tower at least 6 feet high.

    16. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you know about the statue of Roger Conant.

    17. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by FirstOne · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "There's one fellow who comes to the KMart where I work occasionally who is rather indignant about the big screen TV behind the service desk that shows continuous advertisements and things; he says it makes him sick, and he has to make a wide loop around it when he comes in or out. "

      Most TV set's emit a significant amount of sonic energy, and no, I am not just talking about the content of the TV programs. :-)

      In the US, the NTSC standard frequency of 15.75 kilohertz was chosen for horizontal retrace interval. As a natural design consequence of the standard, both the horizontal coil and fly back transformer both operate at this same frequency. These components contain wire coils which vibrate as the magnetic field expands and contracts 15,750 times a second. As these wire coils vibrate, the mechanical movement converts into sonic energy at the same frequency, very similar to a speaker. This vibration results in the TV set emitting a continuous, high pitched pure tone, just within the hearing range of humans.

      For the most part, the larger the TV screen, the larger the components, which results in an even higher intensity pure tone emission.

      Exposure to these moderately intense, high frequency pure tones for long periods of time,
      can inflict serious damage too your hearing. One of these conditions is called "Tinnitus".

      Tinnitus sufferers, will often continue to perceive these continuous high pitch tones, long after being exposed. (often years). I.E. A living hell ! The number of 'Tinnitus" sufferers in the US is estimated to be in the 30 to 50 million range. Their number continues to increase at epidemic proportions.

      Thus, avoiding additional exposure to these continuous, pure sound tones is a good start!
      Some suggestions for the technically inclined.

      1. Switch to a full time line double HDTV set/monitor (~31Khz) for normal TV viewing.
      2. Change the scan rate frequency preferences for the video card, sometimes up or sometimes down.
      Often a 1/2 or 1/3 harmonic can inflict just as much damage, especially if it is just a few feet away.
      3. Avoid placing CRT monitors & TV sets in the corners of a room.
      The sound reflections off walls just increase the exposure.
      4. Replace computer CRT monitors with LCD monitors.
      5. Use a laptop computer, and it's built in LCD display for most daily tasks.

    18. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by alcmena · · Score: 2

      My roomie has the motion sickness one. He can't play FPS games for very long. Rather than try and ban all FPS games from the city, he just plays Black & White. :)

    19. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by blindauer · · Score: 1

      Nope, that person was there, too. Quoted right from the article:

      A series of public forums were launched, in which technophiles argued in favor of the service, and the anti-wireless folks -- including a woman who appeared at one meeting wearing dark sunglasses and protective headgear to ward off stray signals -- insisted that the plan was dangerous.

      Wow.

      --
      --Bradley
    20. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by Talkischeap · · Score: 1

      >>There has never been a single piece of hard evidence for low-intensity radio waves causing the symptoms he and others describe.

      You might want to do a Google search before you make such, ignorant statements again, it makes you look like a fool.

      You also might want to look at these links which document just what you claim doesn't eixist.

      - There are at least 60 studies listed here: Reported Biological Effects From Radiofrequency Non-Ionizing Radiation

      - Mobile Phone Electromagnetic Fields Affect Body Cells

      --
      If it don't GO... chrome it. ~ Frank Banks
    21. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you expect to solve problems if you refuse to identify possible symptoms

      Dont think its a matter of refusing to identify possible symptoms. Its the solution they demand thats the problem (banning for all due to the alleged incompatibility of an extreme few).

      For instance, Old Milwaukee gives me uncontrollable liquid sh!ts for days. Should we ban Old Milwaukee worldwide because I seem to have a problem with it?

      Better for me to be the one to impose a personal ban.

      However, universal things like radio waves, the sun, dirt, air, etc are rather unavoidable. If you have a severe reaction to those things, then you may have to face the fact that you either have to desensitize yourself (in these peoples case, some serious psychological help would be a first step), or accept the fact that you probably were a mistake in the grand scheme of things.

    22. Re:The only thing this guy is missing ... by BillX · · Score: 1

      Nuts, I think I'm infected. I too am sickened by large screens of advertising...

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  29. Interference by kenneth_martens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about effects on one's health, but radio frequency interference can be a real problem. For example, I have a set of cordless headphones that I use so I can roam my room listening to music and not bother anyone else. However, my neighbor's cordless phone uses the same frequency (approximately 900MHz, in case you're interested.) I can tell when he's using the phone because the static interrupts my music. If I tune my headphones carefully, I can even hear his conversation.

    Banning wireless technology entirely (as the article describes them doing in Mendocino) is probably not a good solution, but I think there should be regulations and standards enforced to make ensure better cooperation between wireless devices, to prevent interference.

    1. Re:Interference by Doobian+Coedifier · · Score: 1

      There are regulations and standards regarding wireless frequencies. They are set and enforced by the FCC. Unfortunately, much of the spectrum is restricted for government (military) or other non-public use. That's why my 802.11b uses the same frequency as my cordless phone (2.4GHz). Fortunately, both of these devices allows me to change the channel so they don't interfere with each other.

    2. Re:Interference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know there are regulations and standards governing which wireless frequencies can be used, but what no one seems to be worried about is how much interference one device puts out. I can tune my headphones to three different frequencies, which should enable me to avoid any interference with other devices, such as the cordless phone from next door. Unfortunately, the cordless phone swamps *all* *three* of those frequencies with static, and I still can't hear anything. That a problem with the design of phone, which I believe stricter standards would have eliminated. Then again, maybe not.

    3. Re:Interference by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's probably front end overload of your reciever. If a signal is strong enough, you will hear it on every frequency.

      There isn't much you can do. Try sticking a ferrite on any power cords attached to the reciever, and any other non-antenna cables.

      As an unlicensed user of the radio spectrum, you pretty much have to accept any interference generated by any other part 15 device. It's possible his phone is malfunctioning, but it's more likely your reciever is just overwhelmed by it's signal.

      You might want to ask him if he can relocate the base station part of it, or you can relocate the base station part of your equipment. That might help.

      You could also just put metal screen inside all your walls, celing, and floor, that will solve all future interference problems for good.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Interference by nolife · · Score: 1

      You are using a device in a comsumer shared area of bandwidth, this will happen at times and there really is nothing you can do (as others have pointed out with FCC part B which is probably clearly labeled on your headphones and definately in the first few pages of the manual). It is also illegal to knowingly listen to cordless and cellular phones, cellular has extra restrictions imposed in radio scanning hardware, which is yet another corporate funded bill to screw the general mass of people by providing a false sense of security.

      Off topic here but 46-49Mhz cordless phones also share with the common baby room monitors. A strong word of advice to parents with those baby monitors... It is common practice to have a newborn stay in the parents room for the first few months, TURN OFF THE BABY MONITOR WHEN YOU GO TO BED because the whole neighborhood has the ability to hear you trying to make more!! I found this out years ago when I could hear my wife talking on our old cordless phone through our baby monitor reciever, after playing around with the phone I could listen the other way to.

      For cordless phones you can get a 900Mhz or 2.4Ghz digital spread spectrum (DSS) model, not the cheap analog or plain digital ones. If it is not clearly marked as DSS is probably is not, slightly more expensive but well worth the difference. I have never heard of a 900Mhz DSS interfering with anything and only a few of the 2.4Ghz DSS models causing problems, and they provide an extra level of security to evesdropping. I have two DSS 900Mhz models and they work great together.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    5. Re:Interference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and wear a little aluminum foil hat too. they might hear your thoughts. (seriously though, i mean, even if they could, wouldn't aluminum foil make a worse faraday cage than say, steel foil? (if such a thing exists... i suppose you could use a steel box...?)) of course, lead would be ideal, put it has that nasty side effect of being toxic if you don't sandwich it between other materials. (i guess if you did it would be less harmful??)

  30. Amazing.... by Bocere · · Score: 0

    "Electrically sensitive"? This reminds me of the people that claimed to become extraordinarily affected by the proliferation of minute toxins back in the late 80's and into the 90's (ie, the Bubble Man from Northern Exposure). At the turn of the last century, illnesses were blamed on a lack of sunlight and country air. Technology and progress were bad for one's health. While there is indeed a certain risk from pollution - from microtoxins, or from electromagnetic fields, there comes a point where some people are simply being hypochondriacs.

    --
    *Insert clever witticism here.*
  31. Huh? by cperciva · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "This overexposure to pulsed microwaves has been a personal tragedy for me," Wagner said in an e-mail interview. "I'm left hypersensitive -- even my mouse burns my hand when I use my computer now."

    Am I the only person who doesn't understand this? Why did he give an *email* interview if using computers is so painful to him?

    1. Re:Huh? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Email interview = someone sent an email, it was printed out he typed the response (on a manual typewriter) and then it was then sent back to the interviewer after being typed out again by some lackey.

    2. Re:Huh? by necrognome · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he has a neural interface to his computers, like so many of us have been waiting for for so long. That would exacerbate his EMF exposure though...

      --


      Let's get drunk and delete production data!
    3. Re:Huh? by Rupert · · Score: 2
      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    4. Re:Huh? by arkanes · · Score: 2

      She actually is just a kook, because she uses a computer regularly. In fact, she had one in her home for years, without any problems. She'd never figure out how to use her computer without a mouse anyway.

    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When your hand is placed over the _mouse_ the bulk of the magnetic fields received by your hand are coming from your CRT. Unless the desk layout is truely unhuman, the "burn rate" shouldn't differ as the hand is moved from keyboard to mouse.

      I'd venture a guess that this person sufferes from carpal tunnel syndrone; they "burning" sensation is coming from pressure on a nerve, not evil death rays.

      I have a friend who works for a nuclear saftey consulting firm. He told me once that he routinely gets calls from an individual who gets "sick" from the "radiation" coming from their electrical outlet (this indivdual lives in an area that gets part of its power from an atomic plant.) Apparently this individual went so far as to cover his unused electrical recepticals with aluminum foil to block the "radiation" and "stray magnetic emissions."

    6. Re:Huh? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Perhaps she uses a non-point-and-click mail reader?

      If a mouse burns her hands, how could a computer keyboard fail to burn her fingertips?

      Chris Mattern

    7. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As in any interview, responses are trimmed and edited to fit the subject (taking out "uh"s and "you know"s, removing digressions, etc.) and in some cases the unedited transcript can be revealing.

      In this case the full quote was probably something like:

      "Ouch! Ahhga even my AHHH! God damn it! mouse burns my hand, burns, ahh shit the pain. Mouse burns my hand when I use my computer now, oh fuck, fuck fuck fuck, ah god damn, ah fuck. It hurts so much to type this, ah god have mercy! Does that answer your question? OH FUCCCKKKKKK!!"

    8. Re:Huh? by GreyKnight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hm. This sounds more like carpal tunnel syndrome, than sensitivity to electric fields (though I daresay it's probably all in her head). Assuming, of course, that she's telling the truth (it's not like no one ever lies to the media).

      Anyway, how much of an electric field does she think a mouse generates anyway? I don't have any hard numbers, but I'd bet that the EM fields from a monitor exceed those of a mouse by a few orders of magnitude.

      What would be interesting would be a correlation between the complainants degree of technical literacy and their perceived sensitivity...I wouldn't be surprised if technically literate people are much less susceptible to this sort of thing...

    9. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use special gloves and suits you dork?

      I bet $100000000 on that youre an american.

    10. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone's overlooking the obvious: they interface their PCs with psychic viewing.

      How do you think they listen to Art Bell without having a radio???

    11. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps he has a neural interface to his computers, like so many of us have been waiting for for so long. That would exacerbate his EMF exposure though...

      What if it was optical?

    12. Re:Huh? by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      no.. the interviewee specifically noted that using a computer mouse made her hands hurt.. obviously they used a computer occaisionally to learn that..

    13. Re:Huh? by JanusFury · · Score: 0

      I know! She has one of them optical mice, and because it's upside down when she uses it, the laser burns her hand!

      --
      using namespace slashdot;
      troll::post();
    14. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (though I daresay it's probably all in her head)

      Funny, I think of the word daresay as saying that you're making a small assumption.

      The fact that she's a hypochondriac who's found a person that increases her paranoid fantasies is not just sad, it is obviously true. It would at least hold up beyond a "reasonable doubt" test, which is what you usually get for a single person. At any rate, using the word daresay is simply wrong. If everyone admits what she is, it will be easier for her to find help.

      An easy litmus test for her would be to sit her in front of her computer (exposing her to all the rays from her monitor that she didn't seem to complain about), then putting her hand on the mouse when it's not plugged in to the computer. What do you think the loony woman will do?

  32. Pacemakers? by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    I don't have any credible data, but being in the hospital yesterday, they absolutely, positively, do not allow cell phones or other wireless devices on cardiac floors. They, supposedly, interfere with pacemakers and other devices.

    Now, honestly, you guys think you can put your technology down for one town? I don't know of anyone that has something so important to do on a wireless conneciton to put a pacemaker-person's (is that a pacemakee??) life at risk..

    But, then again, you have to be pretty close to that pacemaker.... shrug...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Pacemakers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As a physician, I feel qualified to answer this. The reason you are not allowed to use cell phones on the cardiac floor is because of interference with the cardiac telemetry monitors, not with pacemakers. Yes, *strong* magnetic fields and microwave radiation can interfere with pacemakers, but the cell phones are banned simply so the nurses at the other end of the hall don't see "funny things" on the monitors that are supposed to be showing the 3 or 12-lead EKG output from the patients.

    2. Re:Pacemakers? by KshGoddess · · Score: 1

      Dude, I worked in a hospital that had wireless access points & a fully functional wireless network.
      Even in the Heart Center.
      The access points didn't interfere with pacemakers or other sensitive medical devices. The only wards that didn't have wireless laptops were the ICU's... because the rooms were so full of equipment already. We ended up using Citrix clients on their monitoring devices (which would switch back in case of emergency) for these nurses to use the same system as the rest of the hospital for patient monitoring, etc.

      I remember doing a presentation on our RF wireless system to the rest of IT -- we used a company that used FHSS (Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum) technology. Safe, effective, and took interference better than DSSS (Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum).

      If wireless access points are safe enough for use in hospitals, why are these people up in arms? Can you say psychosomatic? Can you say hypochondriac? I knew you could.

      --
      It's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable. It's a lot wrong to say it's a suspension bridge.
    3. Re:Pacemakers? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      My mother-in-law's had a history of heart trouble, and the reason we weren't allowed to use our cell phones when we visited her in the hospital was because they use lots of remote telemetry. She had a bunch of electrodes that plugged into a transmitter about the size of a bar of soap, and that sent information to the nurse's station. You could also stop at any one of several remote monitoring stations located throughout the hospital, type in her patient ID and watch the readings in real-time. The remote stations on her floor were wireless, but I believe the remote stations on other floors were connected using coax. The cardiology floor was the only floor (that we visited) that required cell phones to be turned off.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    4. Re:Pacemakers? by amccall · · Score: 2
      I shoulda posted my earlier reply here...

      A few years ago my little brother got a pacemaker. While they are not as restricted as the once where, in terms of avoiding certain things, the manufacturers/doctors still recommend avoiding a few things.

      One such thing is that while using a cellphone, it should be used on the the side of the head furthest away from the pacemaker. They also recommended avoiding close contact with wireless devices near the area of the PM. - Nothing to the extreme requiring someone to move out to a town far away w/o anything.

      More likely, the hospitals are concerned with monitoring equipment or ppl with OLD pacemakers. I get the impression that they only warn off certain activities with the new more advanced ones as insurance.

      --
      ------ 24.5% slashdot pure
    5. Re:Pacemakers? by Hydro-X · · Score: 1

      Our local hospital has banned the use of two-way radios, cellular phones and any other TX device inside the hospital walls. They claim that it may cause interference with medical devices. If this is true, if I ever ride in an ambulance, you can be damn sure the paramedics are gonna turn off their two-way radios...

    6. Re:Pacemakers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding was that the cell phones were banned so they wouldn't interfere with the wireless monitoring devices installed in most hospitals. You can see the antennae in the hospital hallways all over the place.

      It would be kinda funny (and scary) if you turned on your cell phone in a hospital and all the patients suddenly flatlined on the nurse's station's screens, wouldn't it?

      By the way, that's also the reason you can't use cell phones on an air plane - the cell phone could interfere with the plane's communications and navigational systems.

    7. Re:Pacemakers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a family physician, and have taken care of lots of folks on the cardiac floor. The telemetry is the reason given to the public to justify the "no cell phones inside here" policy. Tons of patients' family members still use them, however, and it does not interfere with the telemetry. I seem to recall a problem in Texas a couple years ago where interference of the wireless LAN *did* interfere, though...can't really remember.
      The real reason to put up "no cell phone use in here" signs is that trying to talk to a patient or family member when someone in the room is talking on a cell phone is...well, ANNOYING AS PISS.

  33. skewed symptoms? by Drake58 · · Score: 1

    it seems to me that the common electrical sensitivty symptoms are very similar to those of chronic use of methamphetamine. how can I tell? :-)

    1. Re:skewed symptoms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask spiralx.

  34. did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by ruebarb · · Score: 4, Funny

    ""This overexposure to pulsed microwaves has been a personal tragedy for me," Wagner said in an e-mail interview. "I'm left hypersensitive -- even my mouse burns my hand when I use my computer now."

    Isn't a mouse a MECHANICAL DEVICE - virtually 99 percent electronics free...there may be a diode or two in there..but it can't be generating an electronic signal - it's probably only getting the barest of electricity from the PS2 port to power the thing. (unless you're using one of those new Infrared mice) -

    If it's burning your hand, then that means it's probably IN YOUR FRIGGEN HEAD!!!!

    Sounds like someone's setting themselves up for another juicy lawsuit. Glad I don't live in California right now or I'd be paying for it.

    --

    ----------
    ah honey, we're all resplendent - Bill Mallonee
  35. Now we know ... by TheViffer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    why Ted Kaczynski lived in a shack in the back hills of Montana.

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  36. If He by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    could get to Afganstan I sure he would feel much better.

    I know I would.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  37. Hypocritical? by Mondrames · · Score: 2, Funny

    For someone who is "Hypersensitive" wouldn't this be harmful?
    "Nowadays when Firstenberg travels, he lugs along a bevy of devices to detect radio frequencies, including a meter that gauges electrical, magnetic and microwave fields."

    1. Re:Hypocritical? by rbean · · Score: 1

      Oh, didn't you know? They have divining rods for the electrically sensitive. They must have some on EBay.

  38. electronic terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with absolute no evidence to back this already proposterous sounding illness, I am curious to visit this town with a cell in my pocket giving everyone big hugs.... and then hitting them over the head with it.. This man is 51 years old, radiotechnology is not that new, he has been bathed in it since a pup.

  39. Well, since nobody's posted it yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  40. I'm "electrically sensitive" too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everytime I type www.slashdot.org I got shockedeh

  41. 9 out of 10 reviewers said the book was by TheViffer · · Score: 4, Funny

    "shocking and electrifying"

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  42. ES techie issues by -douggy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a bit of a geek with a few PCs in my room + lapto + stero equipment like many a slashdot reader has I am sure. However I find that I possitivly cannot sleep if there is anything electrical near my bed. I accidentally left a mobile phone near me the other night and couldn't sleep a wink. Probably caused by too mush slashdotting and irc. My GF is similar she cannot sleeo with her alarm clock by her bed as it gives her nightmares

    1. Re:ES techie issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you were too stupid to get up and move the mobile phone away from your bed after staring at it in fear for an hour?

    2. Re:ES techie issues by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

      I keep trying to explain to the help desk why I can't wear a pager or cell phone, but they never listen. Maybe this article will help convince them!

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    3. Re:ES techie issues by buysse · · Score: 2
      My GF is similar she cannot sleeo with her alarm clock by her bed as it gives her nightmares

      My alarm clock gives me nightmares too. I hate mornings. Especially mornings on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, and (when I have to work) Saturdays.

      Hello Psycho, I'm Somatic! Nice ta meetcha.

      --
      -30-
    4. Re:ES techie issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm exactly the opposite. I can't seem to even get to sleep without the sound of a fan running anymore. I think it's a musical thing though, more the nice constant noise it produces....

    5. Re:ES techie issues by RollingThunder · · Score: 2
      I accidentally left a mobile phone near me the other night and couldn't sleep a wink.


      The problem with this anectodal "evidence" is that you only thought to look for something 'odd' when you couldn't sleep.

      The five other times that you left the phone near the bed and slept fine, there was nothing odd, so you didn't look. (illustrative example only)

      The human brain is an amazing pattern matching device - so much so that it will fixate on patterns that absolutely do not exist, because damnit, there MUST be one!
  43. These people are flakes... by meldroc · · Score: 2

    Somebody needs to put straitjackets on these folks and lock them in a padded Faraday Cage.

    --

    Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
    1. Re:These people are flakes... by nuetron · · Score: 1

      Whats that noise in my head???

  44. Faraday cage? by elsegundo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why doesn't this guy build himself a Faraday cage, and leave everybody else alone?

    Nope, don't like it. Too simple. Too clear cut...

    --


    The revolution will be televised. Blackout restrictions apply.
    1. Re:Faraday cage? by JesseL · · Score: 2

      He wouldn't know what to complain about when his "symptoms" didn't go away. He's found somthing to bitch about and he doesn't want to give it up.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    2. Re:Faraday cage? by Cerebus · · Score: 1

      He already has something to blame it on-- Multiple Chemical Sensitivity.

      --
      -- Cerebus
  45. Re: Economic Woes by Gropo · · Score: 0

    His critics claim that he is driving away any chance of a significant economy.

    What are they thinking!? Imagine what this will do for the profit margins on Hemp Jewelry and Stained Glass Mushrooms!
    I know I know... moderated to -1... :P
    --
    I hate Grammar Nazi's
  46. Not really Salem (OT) by mshomphe · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm pretty sure the place where the Salem Witch Trials occured is present-day Danvers, MA.

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  47. Oh, I love it! by SecurityGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The guy's electrically sensitive, and yet he carries around sensors to tell him when he's in fields he's sensitive to. :) Funny, I'm thermally sensitive (anything over a couple hundred degrees causes intense burning pains), but I don't carry around a thermometer to tell me when I've stepped in the campfire.

    1. Re:Oh, I love it! by linzeal · · Score: 1, Troll
      Devil's advocate mode on.

      Perhaps he uses the levels to know precise levels of energy and amplititude that cause particular sensations. If one were going to find the level at which the human body registers heat as pain instead of warmth one would have to do something similar.

      Devil's advocate mode off.

      These are people that will not adapt to the new enviroment that some if not most humans will prosper in if this is true. Evolution will select for those people that can thrive under fluorescent light, surrounded by electrical devices, and generally bathed in ever increasing amounts of radiation (be it electromagnetic or otherwise) without significant genetic, physical or psychological damage. The rest of them can have the surface of this planet we will send up fruit baskets every once in awhile and we will be sure to visit when we are hungry after a long day's work.

    2. Re:Oh, I love it! by gspeare · · Score: 1

      Of course he does...otherwise, it would be easy to debunk him by setting up a powerful electromagnet nearby while you talk to him, then ask how he's feeling.

      Hm, wonder how hard it would be to "borrow" his detectors and "adjust" them. Perhaps add a remote control...

    3. Re:Oh, I love it! by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      The rest of them can have the surface of this planet we will send up fruit baskets every once in awhile and we will be sure to visit when we are hungry after a long day's work.

      Was this an intentional reference to H.G. Wells' The Time Machine?

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    4. Re:Oh, I love it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you people with your naive ideas of evolution would make me laugh, were i not already crying due to your large numbers.

    5. Re:Oh, I love it! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was. I figured we could have californian granola fed hippie and bible belt fundamentalist bacon eventually.

    6. Re:Oh, I love it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem though anything below the ROYGBV color spectrum, that includes IR, Micro Wave, Short Wave, Radio, and Television waves are not ionizing. Only Ultra Violet and up are.

    7. Re:Oh, I love it! by haruharaharu · · Score: 2

      Evolution will select for those people that can thrive under fluorescent light, surrounded by electrical devices, and generally bathed in ever increasing amounts of radiation

      Yes, we humans aren't cut out for days filled with radiation. Well, except for the Sun that puts out ~1KW/M^2 during a clear summer day. And the Earth's magnetic field. Yes, this pales before a 50W microwave transmitter or a pole 5 miles away.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    8. Re:Oh, I love it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sad to say, but the average bible belt fundamentalist understands darwinian evolution better than you appear to...

    9. Re:Oh, I love it! by FartingTowels · · Score: 1

      The guy is a freak but you should not make a general rule: being _something_ sensitive implies no need for detector of _something_. Take lead or quicksilver for example.

  48. Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Ioldanach · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The list of symptoms causing 'electrical sensitivity' reads like a laundry list of psychosomatic effects. In the article, one woman says that since the school put up this tower, going to the school makes her ill and even touching her computer mouse burns her. Of course, the article goes on to say that there have been towers on that school for the past 30 years. And the big advocate for this? He carries around a bevy of equipment to detect electrical fields, which I don't expect make him feel any better about the places he visits.


    And I have one all-important question: Have *any* of these people been tested within the confines of an experiment to see if they *really* experience these problems? Try putting them through an experiment in an environment secure & devoid of radio activity (say, a bunker somewhere with a guassian cage around it).

    Such an experiment would entail:

    1. A control group which does not get any sort of exposure, and has no means by which the occupant would see any source of exposure.
    2. A group with appliances inside the gaussian cage that can emit RF, such as computers & microwaves
    3. A group with appliances inside that don't get any juice, and thus *can't* emit
    4. A group in the same environment as the control group but with externally injected RF noise.

    Only with that kind of an experiment can their claims be given any sort of credence. Until then, its all quackery.

    1. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, it would seem to be exceptionally easy to set up a nice double-blind study of this phenomenon.

      Has it ever been done?

    2. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Ioldanach · · Score: 2

      Doh! I meant Faraday Cage, not Gaussian Cage. (sorry)

    3. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by linzeal · · Score: 0, Troll

      This site actually mentions such things. A government site nonetheless but do such things exist ?

    4. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

      I found especially amusing the statement that one of these fellows refused to disclose exactly what medical condition he was diagnosed as having (in order to receive government medical and unemployment benefits). I wouldn't be suprised if it were a psychological condition.

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    5. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by SanLouBlues · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or better yet, when the school has it's public hearing with the goofballs complaining of the emf reveal that it hasn't been broadcasting for the last two weeks. It'd blow their minds :)

    6. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by bananapeel17 · · Score: 1

      Don't you think that there is room for the possibility of this condition being real? I'll bet there isn't much evidence or clinical data to back up these people's claims, but there's probably no evidence to refute it either. People are allergic or sensitive to all sorts of things. Some people are allergic to pencillin. Some people with asthma are really sensitive to car exhaust. Some people get a sunburn from being in the sun for short periods of time. Are all these people crazy?

      Was relativity "quackery" before Einstein & Co figured out all the math? Or observations were made to back up that math? Was the earth's orbit around the sun "quackery" before Galileo and Copurnicus?

      I'm not saying these people are for real, I have no idea. But just becuase there is no proof (yet) doesn't mean that it can't be real.

      --
      Somebody please tell this machine I'm not a machine -
    7. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by scoove · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't tell Mr. Firstenberg, but Mendocino lists a good dozen hams, and I'd have to believe that Mendocino county hasn't been terribly effective in telling the FCC they're the boss.

      According to the ARRL's callsign lookup for zipcode 95460, there are 14 hams listed in the community. The town also sports a amateur radio club - Willits Amateur Radio Society (look at their stated objectives for reference to their county).

      And I'd have to bet the local luddites haven't been too effective in shutting off satellite reception, AM, FM and broadcast TV reception, licensed microwave, 800 MHz trunking (e.g. city/county police, fire and roads), etc.

      So I'm terribly curious how this RF allergy is only affected by specific frequency bands - e.g. 900 MHz analog cellular (but not amateur use of 900), PCS around 1.8 GHz, 2.4 GHz ISM and 5.3/5.8 U-NII allocations?

      Even more curious is that I don't see any reference to the pulsed microwaves emitted by microwave ovens - approximately 2.4 GHz devices that often carry 500 watt radios and leak significantly more RF than the receive end of a 2.4 GHz wireless ISP transmission (e.g. -55 to -85 dBm).

      Apparently the energy crisis wasn't enough for these mysticism-led luddites. They probably won't be happy until the state is living in an ag commune...

      *scoove*

      I'd even bet that if we moved service into another frequency assignment, the allergy would follow.

    8. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by PD · · Score: 2

      Try putting them through an experiment in an environment secure & devoid of radio activity (say, a bunker somewhere with a guassian cage around it).

      Then your experiment would have to control for those who are ground sensitive. It wouldn't work otherwise.

    9. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what we're asking for ... a simple experiment to provide some evidence one way or another.

      But considering that everyday experience doesn't bear out there complaint, I'd say that the evidence is against them.

    10. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      you are missing a large portion of Radio energy..

      every sattelite in space that has that location in it's illumination area. or how about that funny juggawatt tranmitter we have in the sky called the sun? Or the telephone microwave links that aim across that town, etc..

      I have "expierienced" one of these wacko's before.. complaining that my Ham radio station's transmissions upset her. when confronted because she called the police I was transmitting with my 2meter handheld in my pocket that was 3 feet from her at 5 watts (more ERP then she recieves from my tower antenna at 100 watts) and was saying how she felt better now that I wasn't transmitting. The officer was amused when I asked him why she didin't notice my radio, and I had been transmitting for the past 5 minutes. but she started to act as if in pain when I pulled it out of my coat.... wow it must be in view then? LMAO.

      It's a mential illness, just like the pierced freaks. (no offense to pierced freaks)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, there's excellent evidence that income tax causes significant mental diress in literally millions of americans, not to mention increased blood pressure, spousal abuse and other harms.

      I'll bet we could make a lot of people healthier if we just banned taxes altogether!

    12. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by yeastbeast · · Score: 1

      Over the years, there have been many studies that used a variety of experimental and epidemiological techniques to examine the effect of EMFs on health. The short answer is... there aren't any. The following recent review article summarizes the state of the field: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstrac t/89010981/START. Unfortunately, zealots of the Mendocino variety have made themselves deaf to science... they rarely subscribe to the premises underlying the scientific method of hypothesis and experimentation. No amount of negative data will convince these people that their "feelings" aren't "real."

    13. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Some nitpicks - willits it's several hours drive from Mendo (it's not even in 95460, it's in 95490), and I'd be suprised if anyone actually living within Mendocino broadcasts (rural area, remember. Lots of people get mail in Mendo that don't live there). Sattelite reception is fine, but there's no cable, and only one (weak) broadcast televion station. No AM radio to speak of. There is FM radio, but the only one based in Mendo is the student station mentioned in the article. There's no police station (Mendocino isn't incorporated, there is no "city"), and, to my knowledge, all the fire house has is scanners. They've been VERY effective in shutting off celular, there's no cell service in most of the county, and every time there's a bid to put one up, it rapidly gets shot down.

    14. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by elmegil · · Score: 2

      It is difficult, nigh unto impossible, to prove a negative, i.e. absolutely refute such claims. The burden of proof is on the claimants. They've had a LONG TIME to provide even hints of evidence with scientific validity (I've been hearing such claims since my childhood in the 70's). If we haven't had any indications outside of anecdotal evidence (see above comments about HAM dealing with a woman who couldn't feel his portable xmitter until she saw it), then I'm going to err on the side of calling their bluff and telling them to put up or shut up.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    15. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      Cool, I'm pierced, does that mean I can get a disabled parking pass? Parking is impossible (and expensive) in San Francisco...;-)

    16. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you have normal pierciens then no, you must have a minimum of 30 piercings or holes greater than 1/4 inch to qualify.

    17. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Carter+Butts · · Score: 1
      Don't you think that there is room for the possibility of this condition being real? I'll bet there isn't much evidence or clinical data to back up these people's claims, but there's probably no evidence to refute it either.
      Actually, there's plenty of evidence which, for all intents and purposes, refutes the claim of health problems from low-frequency EMF. This evidence takes the form of numerous studies which have sought the proposed effect, but have failed to find it, along with studies whose initial findings vanished as better measures of the variables in question were employed. (See Robert Park's Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud for a nontechnical summary.)

      Of course, there are always those who will hold out hope that, somehow, there could be an effect...but if it's there, it's so small as to be far less important than the myriad other risks to which you are exposed on a daily basis. Frankly, this sounds like a good, old-fashioned panic to me....

      -Carter Butts

    18. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok...

      I have to admit that it is a common complaint (among the broadcast engineers that i know) that when standing near the base of their FM transmitter sites that they get headaces. However, since according to the fcc, the station there is only 250 Watts and i have only experenced this problem with stations that operatate at 30,000 Watts or higher (unless i fire up the 30 watt fm exciter in my office).

      finaly, if this guy is not actually on the roof of the school, holding their FM transmitting elements he should really not be having a problem. He probably gets more radation at his home from the next town's commercial FM and AM stations than from the poor high school station he is using as an easy target.

      John

    19. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by M-G · · Score: 2

      And I'm sure the officer that responded had a repeater in his car to tie in to his handheld radio....

    20. Re:Psychosomatic illnesses + zealots = bad news. by M-G · · Score: 2

      Hook up that exciter to a dummy load and you won't have as much problem... :)

  49. In another wired article... by Raymond+Luxury+Yacht · · Score: 1

    ...Arthur Firstenberg deemed an insufferable pratt, and residents of Mendocino, CA, to be suffering from the same condition.

    Film at 11.

    --

    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  50. Only in Mendocino... by rackhamh · · Score: 1

    Anybody who's ever lived in Mendocino will not be surprised by this at all. Mendocino is truly a unique place, inhabited by a wide range of eclectic individuals.

    It's also one of the more beautiful places I've ever been.

  51. Collecting by The+Gardener · · Score: 1

    Alert! The country's major loonie collection centers on Mendocino. Seriously, if this guy wasn't just a flaming asshole, he'd move to Amish country or one of many foreign nations where this isn't an issue.

    The Gardener

    --
    --
    1. Re:Collecting by FlamingAsshole · · Score: 0

      Hey you take that back!!

  52. Umm... news?? by FortKnox · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    People move to a small town to avoid EMP's, cause it makes'em sick...
    People move to a mansion in LA to commit suicide to travel their 'vehicles' onto a comets tail...
    My uncle Ned thinks that all the spiders in the world are his pets...


    Some people are whackjobs. Congrats. Can we get on with the regular news, now?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Umm... news?? by Fishstick · · Score: 2

      >Some people are whackjobs

      That was my initial impression, scanned the article for evidence of the 'tinfoil-hat' syndrome, but found this instead:

      Firstenberg ... graduated from Cornell University with a degree in mathematics and a minor in physics.

      Now, I'm not about to say that he can't be a 'whackjob' because he is a university graduate, but it does seem to throw water on the 'he's just some random nutcase' angle I was expecting to hear.

      Then again...

      A series of public forums were launched, in which technophiles argued in favor of the service, and the anti-wireless folks -- including a woman who appeared at one meeting wearing dark sunglasses and protective headgear to ward off stray signals -- insisted that the plan was dangerous.

      I do feel sorry for anyone who has problems which they are only able to attribute to unseen forces like radio waves, microwaves, magnetic fields, etc.. but showing up wearing protective headgear is hard to take seriously (in the absence of any scientific/medical evidence).

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    2. Re:Umm... news?? by d-e-w · · Score: 1

      Firstenberg ... graduated from Cornell University with a degree in mathematics and a minor in physics.

      Now, I'm not about to say that he can't be a 'whackjob' because he is a university graduate, but it does seem to throw water on the 'he's just some random nutcase' angle I was expecting to hear.


      Actually, that makes a lot of sense to me. There are a lot of people in theorical fields who have quirks or odd obsessions. In some ways, I suspect that those quirks help them to achieve what they do. Luckily, most of them don't have them to the degree which would impact normal functioning.

      Many nutcases are highly intelligent. Intelligence does not equal common sense--however you would define common sense.

  53. No, no, no! by joshamania · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not the CIA! Major League Baseball with their roving constellations of satellites...

    1. Re:No, no, no! by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Shhh! Not so loud, or you'll have Mark McGuire down on you...

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:No, no, no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm. I'd love Mark McGuire to go down on me. He's absolutely DREAMY.

  54. Not to mention ... by TheViffer · · Score: 1

    these people must just about kill themselves in the winter time with low humity and all the static electricity.

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    1. Re:Not to mention ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mendocino is a little town that sits on a point and sticks right out into the pacific ocean (it's the place you see as the back drop for "Murder she wrote") - I doubt that static is ever a problem there

  55. He's ignoring the True Conspiracy by wiredog · · Score: 2

    The Cabal is behind it all! Think about it! What do Mozart's Silver Flute, the Defenestration of Prague, Philip K Dick, and Dubya all have in common? Who was it that poisoned Rusty? And Inoshiro?
    It's not the Black Helicopters you fool! Those are just a ruse to distract your attention from the Real Truth! (They're chartreuse helicopters, anyway.) You have been wasting years of your empty life in an obsessive, paranoiac search for the truth! And you can't handle the Truth! The Truth is that there is one, single, true conspiracy!

  56. Re:If you had read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This wouldn't have been modded Offtopic. :-( Bad Moderator!

  57. forget the amish by Bocere · · Score: 0

    Well, not really. The poor wittle things. The Amish have electricity (in their barns, at least) to better take care of their stock. And where would the Amish be without a few sheep and cows? Besides, the electirically sensitive folks might just have a problem with all the static electricity from wearing wool. Darn!

    --
    *Insert clever witticism here.*
  58. Metal plate? by TClevenger · · Score: 1

    Yeah, every time Catherine turns on the microwave I piss my pants and forget who I am for an hour or so.

  59. What about all the other Wireless Devices? by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    No mention here made of all of the remote controlled devices that have become a part of daily living.
    I wonder if these people crap themselves every time they change the TV channel or open the garage door.....

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:What about all the other Wireless Devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You idiot, that IR!
      That means it uses light, not RW.

      I bet $10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10 that you
      are an american!

  60. TEMPEST Shielding by rhost89 · · Score: 1

    They should just wrap their house in TEMPEST shielding and leave the other residents alone. This is a prime example of "Do whatever the hell you want to with you and yours, just leave me and mine well the F*** alone"

    --
    I will bend your mind with my spoon
  61. Move him to WV by pdqlamb · · Score: 2

    Isn't there an area in West Virginia, something like 10 miles square, where you can't get radio, TV, or cellular? Started by accident but then the radio astronomers and spooks decided they like the low RF background.

    Residents hate it, and want cable.

    1. Re:Move him to WV by cdipierr · · Score: 2

      You're referring to Greenbank, West Virginia, which is part of the NRAO. You can get info about it here. It's pretty cool. I've been there 3 times as part of an astronomy group when I was in college.

    2. Re:Move him to WV by Animats · · Score: 2

      Yes, that's the National Radio Quiet Zone, which covers 13,000 square miles of West Virginia. It was created to create a quiet enough area that spying on RF emissions from the USSR via moonbounce would work. It's retained for radio astronomy.

    3. Re:Move him to WV by fader · · Score: 2

      Having been to some scary parts of West Virginia (yeah, there's about 15 square miles in the state that aren't terribly scary) I can safely say there are a lot of places where you can't get radio, TV, or cellular. There are places that only get a couple of hours of direct sunlight a day... the valleys are that low and steep.

      I can't imagine they're of much use to radio astronomers though, because the very things that make them so low in RFI would block the signals the astronomers are looking for. Being able to see only a few degrees of sky wouldn't help them much. As far as what the spooks are doing, who can say...?

      --
      - fader
    4. Re:Move him to WV by jjeffries · · Score: 2
      Yeah... take a look at their page; I'm sure this guy would love to have dishes in his backyard that make the Statue of Liberty look tiny in comparison.

      At least he'd be close to skiing.

    5. Re:Move him to WV by Barbarian · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding? He'd freak out at all the radio telescope dishes, and insist the CIA was using them to mind control him.

  62. Afraid of aerial electromagnetic transmissions? by toupsie · · Score: 3, Funny
    Have I got a deal for you! Here at Toupsie Tinfoil Haberdashery, we build the best head protection a crazy nut like you can find. The Toupsie MkIV Cranial Aluminum Wrapper can prevent 99.96% of all satellite transmissions, cell phone calls and Dan Rather's nightly CIA instructions from entering that skull of yours.

    What a f%cking nut job this Firstenberg is. I wouldn't be surprised if this is the nutburger preaching all the multiple chemical sensitivity crap. Its sad to see a local economy being devistated by the lunatic fears of a vocal whackjob.

    Click on my link and read about real science and not this pseudo science cow manure.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  63. The guy has a great scam going by jet_silver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Didja see the part where he doesn't disclose his diagnosis, so he can keep collecting disability benefits? His scam goes:

    1) Whine a lot about a man-made phenomenon.
    2) Get good at malingering.
    3) See a doctor, claiming 1) makes you "sick".
    4) Vote for your living from that day forward. (The louder you bitch, the more you cash in!)

    Really, this guy deserves a kick from every Californian, because we are supporting this bullshit with our taxes.

    1. Re:The guy has a great scam going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't blame the guy... after all, it worked for Erin Brockovitch. Made her a millionaire and a movie heroine. So he probably figures it can work for him.

  64. real reason may be by onShore_Jake · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is really because it would make it harder for the police to communicate and find all the pot grown there. Not that I would know about that.

  65. Swedish research? by ptrourke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People vary in their sensitivity to EMFs, and up to 20% of the population (according to Swedish research) can become electrically sensitive.

    Anybody notice that this doesn't cite the article, or quote it? Where was it published, the Swedish edition of The Journal of Irreproducible Results?

  66. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Calcbert · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps they should put up a giant metal sheild over the whole town to block out services like satellite TV and GPS too.....or just lobby the providers of those services to stop them entirely.

    On a slight tangent, is the effect created by microwaving a town wacko about the same as for an AOL CD?

  67. This is almost as bad... by joshamania · · Score: 2

    ...as the idiot with the web site dedicated to eliminating letterboxed movies and television because "the black bars are censoring the movie".

    There was a movie out several years ago called "S.A.F.E" about that chemical sensitivity crap. Please avoid it at all costs, as it is about a nutjob who thinks she's allergic to everything and must live in a clean porcelain box.

    All you nutjobs out there...you don't like electromagnetic radiation? I suggest you bury yourselves deep within the ground in a lead lined box...even that will not stop many cosmic rays from penetrating your soul from time to time.

    1. Re:This is almost as bad... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Link

      That was hilarious.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:This is almost as bad... by joshamania · · Score: 2

      Egggcellent...I forgot where that was. Thanks!

  68. excerpt by schnitzi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wireless Free Mendocino has been instrumental in defeating attempts to bring cell phone and a high-speed Internet service to the town's 1,000-odd residents.

    That hyphen is entirely superfluous.

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  69. I wonder what his comment would be to the fact... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That most of the RF radiation received on earth comes from space...you know from places like the SUN! I know...Mendocino is going to build a giant aluminumized dome over itself..and become the SUN FREE ZONE! What a pure whacko!

  70. Sounds Familiar by Auckerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is a communities of people who live wire and wireless free in the US, they are called the Amish. Nice folk, live a simple life. They don't try to remove radio stations from nearby communities.

    Now if someone beleives that the transmissions are giving them trouble, move to Montana or North Dakota, don't stay in Ca and certainly don't try to move everyone backwards with you. There are alternatives, and they are feasable.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
    1. Re:Sounds Familiar by Ixitar · · Score: 1

      I could not agree more. There are also places in the southwest (desert) that are free of electricity, telephone, radio towers, etc. If someone is truly EM sensitive, then move to somewhere that you can be comfortable.

      If you cannot deal with cold winters, then move south. If you cannot deal with the heat of the south, then move north. If you have allergies, then move away from what you are allergic to. If you are allergic to corn pollen (as an example), then you move away from the farms growing the corn. You do not make the farmer stop growing corn.

      Disclaimer: I do not know if anyone is allergic to corn pollen, but I am using it as an example.

  71. Re:did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by arkanes · · Score: 4, Informative
    I know Christy, and I'll promise that it's in her friggen head. She's also really unlikely to get it together enough to ever file a lawsuit, but she did take medical leave over it.

    People in mendo are really easily swayed by hysterical rantings, especially if they're involved with conspiracies and anti-"The Man". Much the way /. is about Microsoft. Crackpot theories are a pretty big market there.

  72. Guess I'm Sensitive too by stinkydog · · Score: 3, Funny

    If I leave my laptop on my lap for more than a few minutes, I develop a burning sensation.

    Bender: (points scanner at Fry)
    Fry: Ouch, My Sperm.
    Bender: (Scans Fry again)
    Fry: Funny, it didn't hurt that time.

    SD

    --
    âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
  73. Gee, Thanks! by w.p.richardson · · Score: 3
    Do you have a website I could check out for this place? It sounds like something I would be interested in.


    TIA!

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    1. Re:Gee, Thanks! by jandrese · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ironically, yes the Amish hhave a website. Go figure.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Gee, Thanks! by Delphis · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I posted my 'go figure post' before seeing yours. :) It is kinda amusing how the Amish seem to be embracing technology..

      --
      Delphis
    3. Re:Gee, Thanks! by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2
      Ironically, yes the Amish [800padutch.com] hhave a website.


      I'm reasonably certain that the website is not run by an Amish person. There's a lot of tourist activity in the PA Dutch area. And although some of the Amish reap the rewards, much of the money goes to other individuals hoping to make a buck off of the interesting facets of the Amish community.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  74. That would be fine ... by TheViffer · · Score: 1

    .. but college kids would have to much fun sticking lighting rods onto it as a prank :-P

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  75. I think i'm electrically sensitive. by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was wiring a 3 phase 220 outlet and I got hit with 220. It thew me clear across the room. I guess this would qualify me as "electrically sensitive".

    -ted

    1. Re:I think i'm electrically sensitive. by zulux · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was wiring a 3 phase 220 outlet and I got hit with 220.

      Jesus - be carefull with this stuff!

      I'm a smart geek - so I figgured that I could wire 220 -- 'just like 110, just with higher voltage.' Woops. Please if any of you fellow geeks get the idea that wiring 220 is just like 110, only stronger - PLEASE CURL UP ONE LATE EVENING WITH A GOOD ELECTRICIAN'S BOOK AND READ IT. I think my genetals are ok now, and the twitching has mostly gone down when I take the pills, but please, don't make Sally Stuthers sad.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:I think i'm electrically sensitive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think my genetals are ok now

      Moderators, you know what to do. -1, Too Informative.

    3. Re:I think i'm electrically sensitive. by zerofoo · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod this one up. Very Funny.

      -ted

    4. Re:I think i'm electrically sensitive. by jayed_99 · · Score: 2

      Based on my experience (getting zapped with 220) and my observations (watching other people getting zapped by 110 and 220), I say, "Take the 220 zap every time."

      Imagine that you just had 18 pots of coffee instantaneously administered via IV, were dipped into hot grease for a split-second, and a Mack truck ran into you and rammed you into the wall 20 feet away. That's getting hit by 220.

      110 is just like the above minus the Mack truck. Which means that you stay attached to the nasty circuit that is frying you. All of those movie images about some guy grabbing a live wire and hanging on while he jerks -- that is 110. If it had been 220 he would have been blown across the room.

      You're more likely to get injured by 220, but you're more likely to get killed by 110.

  76. Cancer or not ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hydro-Quebec in Canada have some issues about peoples that don't want electric lines to pass nearby their house. They have order an study about that problem and they found that living near power lines raise the chance of developping blood cancer.

    I just don't know if wireless appliance is the solution knowing that magnetic field created by electricity may cause cancer

    What about other waves ?

  77. Me? I gonna get rich! by Chuqmystr · · Score: 1

    I'll just move to the outskirts of their little town and set up shop. I'll manufacture copper foil baseball caps, chainmail and grounding wrist straps with realy long cords. So who's with me?

  78. This wacko lives off our taxes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...since he collects disability insurance.

    So, now, do you feel happy about the kind of people YOUR taxes pay for?

    Keep coding/networking, your 27% marginal tax rates is going straigh to Mendocino! Enjoy!

  79. No AC Power either eh? by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    I guess he doesn't have AC power, and lives deep underground in a large copper box right? Not too many other ways to come close to totally escaping EM, the above would be one of the few true ways.

  80. More PC California Crap by clustersnarf · · Score: 1

    He had to move to California from New York, not because of the EMF, but because any wackjob can convince the other nutcases in California to let him have some soverign space to stand in. California is the "Hold My hand and Pamper my Whim" State. Since the 1960's California has been a haven for complainers, hippies, whiners, and other assorted wastes of Carbon. Just because NYC most likely laughed at him for wearing his Aluminum Foil Cap, he moves to CA where he will fit in with the rest of the weirdos.

    I say , Jackhammer California off the continent, and let them have their own little Hippie Wackjob commune Island, and stop polluting the rest of our country with their useless ideals.

    Mod Down, Flaimbait

    FU CALI

    1. Re:More PC California Crap by clustersnarf · · Score: 1

      FLAMEBAIT!

      bah./...

    2. Re:More PC California Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to all of those sensible gun/bible obsessed nuts in the southeast?

    3. Re:More PC California Crap by clustersnarf · · Score: 1

      At least in the Southeast with the possibility of everyone having a gun, there is a level of deterrence. With less guns legally owned by people, there is less chance that who you try and rob will have a gun. Hence the possbility drops that you'll be shot while comitting such a crime. So, whats better? The Government and State telling you that you can't protect yourself, or having the option of whatever personal firepower you want?

    4. Re:More PC California Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you've offended your first californian!

    5. Re:More PC California Crap by Layer3OSI · · Score: 1

      Yah... I don't necessarily care about owning a firearm at the moment but I do enjoy having the choice.

    6. Re:More PC California Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More people have been killed by Teddy Kennedy's car than my gun...

  81. Double Blind Study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that it would be exceptionally easy to set up a double-blind study to prove or disprove this "electrical sensitivity" condition.

    Has it been done?

    1. Re:Double Blind Study by Drizzten · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but...

      Do laboratory studies indicate that power-frequency fields can cause cancer? Short answer, no. There's a ton of good info on that site.

      --

      "All mankind is at the mercy of a handful of neurotics". - Norman Douglas
  82. Wait a minute... by TheRealFixer · · Score: 1

    If we can have a cell-phone free zone, how about a Microsoft-free zone! I'm PC-sensitive.

  83. Wha? by govtcheez · · Score: 2, Funny

    English teacher Christy Wagner said her students suddenly became "irritable and easily distracted" and that she herself felt nauseous whenever she was at the school
    Since when have English students not been irritable and easily distracted?

    Teacher: "Billy, what did Shakespeare mean with his use of the term 'ass-backwards' in Sonnet 103?"
    Billy: ::snore::

  84. what a goob by macsox · · Score: 1

    this guy must have grown up under some power lines...

  85. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by ergo98 · · Score: 2

    The list of symptoms is like a hypochondriacs grab bag: Such vague, common symptoms like "sleep problems", or "tiredness". To be honest it sounds more like depression than anything else.

    Until such a time as they can put someone in a radio isolated room, and test how they feel with and without a transmitter turned on, with a positive correlation, I find this absolutely ridiculous. The symptom list is exactly the same as the sympton list used for dirty vents, bad office air, extended computer use, drinking unfiltered water, having bad feng sheu, etc.

  86. Next thing you know... by necama · · Score: 1

    ... these people are going to be complaining about how the sun is throwing off an excessive ammount of electromagnetic radiation, and how we should blow it up to protect ourselves.

    Never mind that the rest of us like the sunlight....

  87. I would use wireless devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I got high.

  88. My spidey sense is tingling by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

    What is funnier was, he claims that being exposed to dental x-rays caused the problem?

    I think by all medical logic, the x-rays would have fused him with any animal around and endowed him with the abilities of that animal... alla spiderman :)

    Unless the only animal around was a "self important prick" because he seems to have been endowed with the super-powers of that species.

    Seriously, this guy clearly has a problem, a psychosomatic illness.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:My spidey sense is tingling by kurowski · · Score: 1

      man, tough crowd here on /.

      what exactly is the problem with a guy who wants to live in a city with less electromagnetic radiation than other cities? america is built on the ideal that people like this guy can fight for causes like this one, in order to ensure their ability to pursue the kind of lifestyle they'd like to live. if you don't like it, don't move to mednocino. if you want to live in mendocino, then lobby against him.

      sheesh.

      there are a lot of self-important pricks out there, but this guy doesn't sound like one of them.

    2. Re:My spidey sense is tingling by arkanes · · Score: 2

      No, he's a self important prick. Mendocino has alot of them. I'm all excited because this is the first time I've seen one in anything as mainstream as Wired and slashdot, though.

  89. Prove it and make a million bucks by Daniel+Rutter · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I think James Randi would agree that being able to organically and personally detect "domestic" levels of EMR counts as a paranormal ability.

    Prove a paranormal ability and Randi will give you one million U.S. dollars, baby.

    Seriously. A million bucks. No kidding.

    Well, Mr Firstenberg?

    We're waiting.

    We're still waiting.

    We're going to be waiting forever, as usual, aren't we?

    Just to save Mr Firstenberg some time, I'll list a typical collection of objections to the validity of Randi's offer, as proffered by various alleged levitators and mind readers, on Mr Firstenberg's behalf:

    "There is no money. There is too little money. There is too much money. I want to see the money in a pile. Proximity to cash compromises my spiritual enlightenment. Randi is a powerful anti-psi ray emitter. Randi is a cannibal and I am afraid of him. The FBI will forcibly change my gender if I win. I want it in Tongan Pa'angas, not US dollars. Money is an illusion. Property is theft. I'm a teapot! I'm a teapot!"

    1. Re:Prove it and make a million bucks by cmason35 · · Score: 0, Troll

      There sufficent reasons to questions Randi that no one needs to invent them. Even many hard core (CSICOPS types) sceptics will admit that Randi habitually makes logical errors and abuses his guests. This isn't to say that Randi hasn't exposed some outright quackery, but that he is only interested in promoting his agenda, not science.

    2. Re:Prove it and make a million bucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      being able to organically and personally detect "domestic" levels of EMR counts as a paranormal ability.

      Does being able to organically and personally detect "domestic" levels of ESR count?

    3. Re:Prove it and make a million bucks by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      This story made my bullshit detecting ability trigger. Surely a paranomal event.

      -

    4. Re:Prove it and make a million bucks by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Increasingly a normal event, that.

  90. S.A.F.E. by 2Flower · · Score: 2

    Actually, don't avoid the movie. It's an interesting look at exactly the sort of hypochondria this guy has -- while the character in the movie SEEMS to have intense allergic reactions to everyday chemicals, near the end of the movie it's made... not CLEAR, exactly, but definitely implied as a theme of the film that it's more psychological. The chem-free camp she goes to feels awkwardly wrong, her new lifestyle is so sterile that she's barely alive, etc...

    Not totally off topic. This movie is actually good footage to study the issue. Even if you feel the issue is crackpots and tinfoil hats, it illustrates what can lead to this sort of reaction.

    1. Re:S.A.F.E. by joshamania · · Score: 2

      I suppose if you look at S.A.F.E. in that light, it might be a descent film. I really didn't like it mostly because it made me cringe to think that people like that exist, not so much that it was a bad film. I believe I spent about 90 minutes writhing in pained anxiety that one of these nutjobs would turn up in real life.

      Of course, "nutjob" not being the preferred nomenclature, as psychological conditions are really not to be made light of.

      Go see the movie, it'll provide some insight...

  91. Psychosomatic? by not_cub · · Score: 2

    I would really like this guy to be wired up to something that may or may not be emitting low-level electromagnetic signals he claims hurt him so much. Say a series of mice that may or may not have had every piece of conductor ripped out of them. If he can successfully guess 20 times (odds of 2^20:1 ~ a million to one), which shouldn't be so difficult if these things physically hurt him. Until then, I don't think I am alone in thinking this guy is a nut-bar.
    Not to mention that if he tries to stifle my broadband internet access, I'll hook him up to some very high-voltage mice indeed.
    not_cub

    --
    q='echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"';s=\';b=\\;echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"
  92. Sensitivity by Rupert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sensitivity of the emotional kind is called for here.

    The tin-foil hat brigade need places to live, too.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  93. *yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it was funny the first time you typed this

  94. I was thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if these are also the same people who also buy Magnetic foot inserts to heal the pain?

    http://www.magnapak.com/new.html

  95. Faraday cages by rcw-work · · Score: 5, Informative
    How can one make a zone wireless free?

    If one were really serious (ly-screwed-up IMHO) about this, one could construct their home as a Faraday cage. Just lay chicken wire around the entire frame (through the double-paned windows and attached to the steel doors' frame, and use conductive weatherproofing in the door jambs) and connect it all together (solder/weld/twist all points of all corners together) into one giant grounded box. All RF with wavelengths less than about one-tenth the gap of the chicken wire will be blocked (the same principle is used for the window on your microwave oven, it's also why you can see through some satellite dishes). If you want this home to have power, you'll want to hook the breaker panel to a large iron-core transformer which will act as a low-pass filter. A similar low-pass filter can be used for the phone line.

    Such a home would be unable to recieve TV or radio, DSL or power-line networking would never pass through, cellphones and government-planted transmitter bugs would be dead inside, and you wouldn't have to worry much about lightning strikes either. Of course it would be cheaper to move out into the boonies.

    Pure bliss huh?

    *groan*

    1. Re:Faraday cages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommended a restaurant in London do this to keep idiots from using cellphones while dining. Yeah, sometimes it's OK, but there are times when it gets intrusive.

      With the right kind of chickenwire you can get a very trendy "industrial" look.

    2. Re:Faraday cages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably won't do anything for cellphones. The wavelength of a 800mhz cell phone is ~.0004 meters. Which means you'll need a mesh .00004 in diameter.

    3. Re:Faraday cages by rcw-work · · Score: 1
      No, the wavelength of an 800mhz anything is 299792458 meters per second (speed of light) divided by 800000000 cycles per second or .375 meters. Which .5" mesh will block with no problem.

      Oh, and "800mhz" cell phones typically use the AMPS analog cell bands at 824.04MHz-893.7MHz, so it's more like 33.5-36.3cm.

    4. Re:Faraday cages by NawBawl · · Score: 1

      Pretty much any house with stucco exterior has chicken wire all around it. look at any new construction (strip malls, homes, etc). After the tarpaper/water barrier, heavy duty chicken wire is wrapped all around, then the stucco cement is applied. I dont know if the wire is grouded, probably not because it's not there for any electrical purpose but to support the stucco cement.

  96. We've got just the thing for them... by stereoroid · · Score: 1

    The Milennium Dome is up for sale, so why don't the Mendocinites (?) buy it, spray it with conductive paint, and thus turn it into the world's largest Faraday Cage? Ideally, this would work both ways, so we'd never have to hear from them again...

    --
    (this is not a .sig)
  97. I think there is something to this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spend 24 hours a day living and working around
    computers and wireless networks. I think the
    electromagnetic fields are diminishing my mojo.
    This must be why I can't get a girlfriend.

  98. don't dismiss this so easily by dewdrops · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    It looks like the /. community immediately assumed this guy is looney.

    I don't know if all of his symptoms are real or imagined, but I will say that using a cell phone or coming close to a wireless ethernet card gives me a migraine every time, and this has been verified in a blind test (friend plugged in card, brought me into the room without telling me it's state; migraine. next day unplugged in card, brought me into the room; no migraine).

    Maybe these kinds of radiation aren't harmful to most people, but let's not immediately dismiss this; I think, if nothing else, this issue should be studied by public researchers because Sprint, AT&T, etc. certaintly aren't going to do anything that would in anyway hurt their profits (cf.tabacco companies and the harmful effects of tabacco).

    so let's not dismiss this out of hand; it's a reasonable question.

    Drew

    1. Re:don't dismiss this so easily by curtisg · · Score: 1

      I am sorry to say that one repetition of your experiment doesn't prove that microwaves caused your migraine.

      A better test would be to repeat the procedure many times, and have your friend flip a coin to decide whether to plug the card in or not. Even then it's still not a very good test.

      It's hard to design a study that reliably tests something. There are probably some people at Harvard that know how to do it.

      It would be useful and interesting to have more well-designed studies about the effects of low-level RF radiation. The more studies, the better.

    2. Re:don't dismiss this so easily by alex.shultz · · Score: 1

      An even better test would be to go with a double-blind type test.

      Have _two_ friends help. Friend #1 flips the coin and either connects or disconnects the card. Friend #1 then notes the state of the card, makes sure that the state of the card is not noticeable in any way, and leaves the room.

      Friend #2 should then escort the test subject in to the room. Test Subject decides if a migraine is in the works or not and leaves a note for Friend #1. Friend #2 and Test Subject leave the room.

      Friend #1 enters the room and adds the result of the test to the data gathered along with the state of the card.

      Lather, rinse, repeat.

      The idea is to make sure there is no way that the test subject can get any hint of the state of the card. If only one friend is doing the work then the friend may give off some kind of subtle clues about the state of the card that the test subject may be able to pick up on. The two-friend method would get rid of that possibility.

    3. Re:don't dismiss this so easily by dewdrops · · Score: 1


      I have repeated it a few times (usually unintentially - I can always tell when a new apartment I go to has wireless ethernet ;-(), but
      even that doesn't scientifically prove anything. But that's besides the point..

      It is what is: anecdotal evidence. The point is that we don't know the effects of all of these new devices that are quickly springing up everywhere, and there are things which suggest that they might be doing bad things.

      It's not a reason to ban them, for sure, but it is a reason to study them and make sure we understand all of the effects of the radiation which is constantly hitting us.

      All I'm saying, as the subject of my post says, is let's not dismiss this guy out of hand until we know for sure what the effects of these devices are.

      Drew

    4. Re:don't dismiss this so easily by John+Miles · · Score: 2

      I can always tell when a new apartment I go to has wireless ethernet ;-(),

      Then God help you if you ever come within 100 feet of a working microwave oven. At that distance, their emissions are still 10-20X as powerful as an 802.11 card at 6 feet.

      I can 'see' more radiation from my neighbor's microwave oven on a 2.4 GHz spectrum analyzer than I get from the Orinoco card in the PC that sits next to the analyzer on my workbench.

      Seriously... get help. Even though the supposed cause of your suffering is purely imaginary, your symptoms themselves may not be.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  99. Wow by nexex · · Score: 1

    sounds like California really is the land of fruits and nuts!

    --
    Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
  100. Mostly harmless by villoks · · Score: 2

    Well,

    The City of Helsinki made recently a study about the effects of mobile phones in hospitals. In most of cases there's no interference or only if the mobile phone is located excatly next to the instrument. After the study most of restrictions on mobile phone use have been lifted, although there's still some areas (intense care etc.) there's mobile phones are prohibited.

  101. Re:did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by smertens · · Score: 1

    For the record, most mice (optomechanical, that is) contain two light emitter/detector pairs to track x & y movement. Then there are a couple of simple contact switches for the buttons, and a tiny IC to transmit it all as serialized data as specified in the PS/2 mouse protocol. Serial mice work the same way, except they have to mind a few extra pins on the serial interface. All mice, including infrared ones, manage to do this by tapping the 5V power provided over the PS/2 or serial cable. (I assume, with some justification, that USB mice are comparable.)

    Having spelled all of that out, you're exactly right. It's negligible. I wonder how the electromagnetic field emitted by living flesh compares...

  102. Re:More PC California Crap - Hippie State? by buckaroo-b · · Score: 1

    Hippie Wackjob commune Island?

    You do realize your tal;king about the state that gave us Ronald Reagan, don't you?

    --

    i have walked down train tracks, walked down train tracks, drunk at 3 a.m. it not magic, it's no great trick, w
  103. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

    It gets better! Exceeding the EMF from computer equipment, power lines, etc. are: HEI ignition in modern cars @50000 volts solar activity lightning (duh) If you go by what the OSHA stuff says, then Morg wouldn't have survived the EMF created by the ion flux of the fire he invented.

  104. Baloney-sensitive by curtisg · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but I'm baloney-sensitive, so I won't be able to visit Mendocino anyway.

    I think maybe these guys got a little too much radiation from the big burning ball of fire in the sky.

    This story caused me to experience dizziness, irritability, a tingling in my lips, insomnia, depression, and sexual dysfunction.

  105. hang on a second.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quote:
    "Drink plenty of good clean water (minimum of 2 litres per day for an adult). This is VERY important as we have found that most ES people we have seen are chronically dehydrated. "

    I knew id seen those "ES Symptoms" somewhere else - 90% of the symptoms are those of chronic dehydration. isnt it a miracle how drinking water makes those "electrical sensitivity" symptoms go away.

    the theory has just disappeared up its own arse.

  106. Cant use my CB anymore!!! by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    'Ol smokey trying to stop da rubber duck! least they wont be able to use those rader guns anymore either...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:Cant use my CB anymore!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      breaker breaker freddie laker!!

  107. Misunderstood electromagnetic spectrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The eletromagnetic spectrum is so misunderstood.

    There is a reason our eyes see the wavelengths they do. Visible light is just the right wavelength to elevate electrons to and induce chemical reactions w/out doing any damage.

    Anything shorter (UV, xray) breaks bonds. Anything longer (microwave) lacks the energy to do any more than wiggle the molecule around, generating a bit of heat.

    If these people stand in front of a fireplace and enjoy basking in its radiative heat, they are getting nailed by electromagnetic emissions of a much higher frequency (and intensity) than any cel phone/tower could produce.

  108. Re:did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by jiminim · · Score: 1

    Must be a wireless mouse...

  109. Send the businesses my way! by Zenjive · · Score: 1

    His critics claim that he is driving away any chance of a significant economy

    If he drives the chance of a significant economy to my neck of the woods, it's ok by me!

    --


    A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with. - Tennessee Williams
  110. Re:did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's a real, living, mouse because he's afrair of computer mice. And the mice is annoyed and is scratching his hand?

  111. Third World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The funny thing is that most third world countries have aggressively adopted wireless communications. Wireless, specifically cellular allows them to have communications quickly and relatively inexpensively. Most of the countries you refer to lack the copper infrastructure that they need for phones because their economies and budgets just can't afford it. But, with wireless they can quickly blanket their respective countryside with cell coverage and anyone that can afford a phone can connect, finally.

    1. Re:Third World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh if they're doing it in the 3rd world then it must be safe.

  112. Dehydration? Suspicious quote by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the powerwatch website, I noticed this line:

    Drink plenty of good clean water (minimum of 2 litres per day for an adult). This is VERY important as we have found that most ES people we have seen are chronically dehydrated.


    Let's just compare the symptoms of the two...
    (Dehydration references: here and here.)

    ES: Unusual tiredness, Flu-like symptoms, Weakness
    Dehydration: Weakness, Fatigue and/or loss of energy

    ES: Problems with concentration, dizziness and loss of memory, Sound sensitivity, Sun sensitivity
    Dehydration: dizziness, changes in mental state (disorientation, memory loss), Delirium, Irritability

    ES: Unconsciousness
    Dehydration: Loss of consciousness

    ES: Cardiac palpitations
    Dehydration: Rapid or weak pulse

    ES: Headaches, Teeth and jaw pains, aches in muscles and joints, Burning pain
    Dehydration: Headache or bodyache

    ES: Nausea and digestive problems
    Dehydration: Nausea, vomitting

    ES: Dryness of the upper respiratory tract
    Dehydration: Dry mouth

    ES: Perspiration
    Dehydration: Sweating

    -------------
    Dehydration doesn't account for all the symptoms, but it sure does cover a lot. Makes you wonder if Mendicino just needs a mandatory water consuption policy...

    Police officer: sir, I noticed that your driving seems as if you are unusally tired and/or dizzy. Have you been drinking?
    Guy: No officer, not a drop!
    Police officer: I knew it! I can spot dehydration a mile away! Take this low life and put him in the tank until he sobers up.
    1. Re:Dehydration? Suspicious quote by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      Now you know why I have a Brita water filter pitcher in my refrigerator. I drink quite a lot of water per day so I feel way better.

    2. Re:Dehydration? Suspicious quote by kEnder242 · · Score: 1

      dont forget that dangerous chemical compound Dihydrogen Monoxide!

      http://www.dhmo.org/

      found in beer, baby food, and cancer.

      --
      my associative arrays can kick your hash - TCL
    3. Re:Dehydration? Suspicious quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably don't know that bulimics, anorexics, and chemotherapy patients have some pretty severe symptoms, too. But they walk among us, not complaining, and not in hospital beds. Yes, they even fall into unconsciousness -- they pass out, wake up, and get on with their life.

      What's with that personal attack? Take a look at yourself and come back when you can write a post without spelling/grammer errors in 75% of the sentences. (Yes, I know, feeding the trolls...)

    4. Re:Dehydration? Suspicious quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ES: Problems with concentration, dizziness and loss of memory, Sound sensitivity, Sun sensitivity
      Dehydration: dizziness, changes in mental state (disorientation, memory loss), Delirium, Irritability
      (emphasis added)

      That does explain a lot, doesn't it?

    5. Re:Dehydration? Suspicious quote by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      I find that drinking a simple glass of water gets rid of a headache as effectively as drinking a glass of water with an asprin tablet desolved in it. YMMV.

      Mind you, exercise without consuming enough water leaves me with a blinding headache -- something that can possibly be traced to a head injury when I was very young. I used to have blinding headaches right through primary school, but no one believed they could be as bad as they were. Chances are that if someone had told me they would go away if I drank water all the time I would have been much better off.

  113. I know the secret by FrankDrebin · · Score: 2

    Firstenberg refused to disclose his diagnosis, which allows him to collect disability income

    If he visits wireless-saturated San Francisco, three hours south of Mendocino, his devices go berserk and he experiences multiple symptoms, including an unquenchable thirst, a pressure in his chest and behind his eyeballs, and "buzzing sensations" in his lips.

    Apparently it is possible to get on the gubment cheese by claiming an affliction derived from the plot of any Gilligan's Island episode.

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  114. solar flares by forehead · · Score: 1

    This guy must really hate solar flares. Maybe he should sequester himself in a faraday cage.

    --
    --
  115. Someone set him up... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Funny

    He didn't realize he was using a 2.4 GHz cordless mouse 10 miles from the actual computer and someone had hooked up a giant hidden power supply inside the mouse.

    No wonder it's burning his hand! It could burn trees down if they were between him and the receiver!

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  116. Flux happens by Tsar · · Score: 2

    "I have people calling me, crying to me that they're in pain all the time, asking me where they can live," Firstenberg said. "I tell them we're trying to save Mendocino as a refuge."

    What I want to know is, why are these people using telephones? Cry to him in a letter! On unbleached, natural paper, of course, using squid ink.

  117. Send the nuts to the desert. by NevDull · · Score: 1

    Why do nutjobs think that they have the right to change how everyone else lives in a relatively high-population area? They could move to Montana or Utah and be far away from electronic "civilization". Their inherent rights include the right to move away from things that bother them.

    1. Re:Send the nuts to the desert. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, I think the last thing most of the Utahns I know want is for more nuts from California to move into their state.

  118. A place to call their own by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    What's the problem with this? At least all of CA's worst hypochondriacs will be in one place now.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  119. This is hilarious by Uttles · · Score: 2

    I hope this woman uses a wireless mouse:
    "This overexposure to pulsed microwaves has been a personal tragedy for me," Wagner said in an e-mail interview. "I'm left hypersensitive -- even my mouse burns my hand when I use my computer now."

    That's just too funny.

    One more thing, if these people are electrically sensitive, how are they calling this guy on their phones? Shouldn't they be using a can and string or maybe a letter or something?

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does everyone on slashdot think misspelling "government" is the height of wit?

  120. you'd be crazy too... by Giant+Killer · · Score: 1

    if people were trying to kill you.

  121. Calling all Ham Radio ops... by Temkin · · Score: 3, Funny


    Field day for all California Ham's should be held in Mendocino this year. Special emphasis on 23cm moonbounce operation requested. All HF ops with 1500 watt amps should bring their own generators, as an electrical shortage is expected.

    Temkin

    1. Re:Calling all Ham Radio ops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Count me in.

      :-)

  122. Oh, well sorry! by Uttles · · Score: 1

    I don't have a spellchecker on my post comment screen, and I really don't feel like taking the time to double check all of my spelling, so excuse me if I mess up on a word here and there, arsehole.

    --

    ~ now you know
  123. hmm by greymond · · Score: 2, Funny

    so if i go there and start using my cell phone near someone can they arrest me for ES-assault?
    Even if they had a legitimate problem (which i dont believe they do) i say there obvioulsy not as evolved as they should be and to bad for them - life sucks then you get run over by a bus.

  124. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by mizhi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember in physics class in high school, we figured out the strength of the EM field around a high voltage wire. We calculated that even as close at 50 feet (like wires suspended in the air), the earth's natural field was like 100 times stronger.

    Since then, I've always viewed these claims of EM radiation problems with a skeptical eye. My own suspicions is that this guy had a few too many REMs to the skull from his dental X-Rays and is a candidate for therapy. :-D

    --
    Humorless sig goes here.
  125. Nut allergies very real by edremy · · Score: 2
    nut allergies

    Careful about the nut allergy thing- peanuts kill more than 100 people/year- more deaths than beestings, shark attacks, snake bites and a lot of other things people worry about. That ain't psychosomatic.

    My wife carries an epipen in case she accidentally eats a peanut or peanut product-very small amounts of peanuts cause her throat to swell shut. Accidentally eating peanuts is a whole lot easier than you might suspect- many, many restaurants fry things in peanut oil and don't tell you. If I eat at Chick-fil-A I can't kiss my wife or touch anything around the house until I wash my mouth and hands to get rid of residual oil.

    Nut allergies are very, very real

    Eric

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:Nut allergies very real by drodver · · Score: 2

      Some people have bad reactions to just the smell of peanuts. That too is very real physical problem. Some schools ban peanut butter in lunches because the smell might cause a reaction in a sensitive child.

    2. Re:Nut allergies very real by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      I could swear I remember being told once that a peanut is technically a bean, not a nut. So a peanut allergy is not a nut allergy, it's a bean allergy.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    3. Re:Nut allergies very real by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

      You can probably call me insensitive jerk, but aren't we tampering with evolution when we protect people with such an obvious genetic defect from natural selection?

    4. Re:Nut allergies very real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can probably call me insensitive jerk, but aren't we tampering with evolution when we protect people with such an obvious genetic defect from natural selection?


      You know, I was just contemplating making the same response, as unpopular as it may be. Of course, I'm still going to post this anonymously. Seriously, though, I know someone with this allergy, and feel really sorry for him, but I don't really think this allergy should be propogated if at all possible.

    5. Re:Nut allergies very real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You can probably call me insensitive jerk, but aren't we tampering with evolution when we protect people with such an obvious genetic defect from natural selection?

      One hopes you wouldn't be wearing glasses, or need fillings in your teeth, or any other kind of 'aftermarket' assist to correct a deficiency, genetic or otherwise.

      That kind of thinking can go very far; be careful, it probably affects more folks you know and like than you realize.

    6. Re:Nut allergies very real by drodver · · Score: 2

      Yes

      But we also do that for people that:
      - have poor vision (genetic defect)
      - have diabetes (genetic defect)
      - are obese (can be a genetic defect)
      - are drug addicts (can be a genetic defect)
      - maybe depression might be a genetic defect)
      - get cancer (lack of enough genetic resistance)
      - any other kind of virus/disease which we treat (lack of genetic resistance)
      - etc etc

    7. Re:Nut allergies very real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can probably call me insensitive jerk, but aren't we tampering with evolution when we protect people with such an obvious genetic defect from natural selection?

      What's the point of becoming gods through technology if we can't tamper with a little evolution along the way?

    8. Re:Nut allergies very real by Suburban+Shaman · · Score: 1

      However, the first six things you mention do not require me to modify my behavior to fix your 'genetic' problem, such as not eat a PB&J sandwich in school, or even have peanut dust on my clothes.

      I believe it should be the responsibility of the allergic person to avoid said substance, instead of banning it for the entire school, as has been the case several times.

    9. Re:Nut allergies very real by drodver · · Score: 2

      How is someone going to avoid a smell in a communial area if the smell causing substance is allowed? Would you want your child to be excluded from eating lunch with the other children if your child was sensitive to it? What if in the first class after lunch a child that had peanut butter on their hands lends a pencil to a sensitive child?

    10. Re:Nut allergies very real by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

      How is someone going to avoid a smell in a communial area if the smell causing substance is allowed?

      They probably can't. How are you going to protect them from "smells" their whole life?

      Would you want your child to be excluded from eating lunch with the other children if your child was sensitive to it?

      Nobody would want that, but it is preferable to having to go out and ban from schools every little thing that might cause a child to have an alergic reaction. Are we now going to have a "zero tolerance" peanut policy in schools so we start suspending any child caught in school with the smell of peanuts on their person. Schools have gotten insanely totalitarian enough already without adding this sort of craziness to the mix.

      What if in the first class after lunch a child that had peanut butter on their hands lends a pencil to a sensitive child?

      What if in the first class of the day a child that had eaten a peanut butter sandwich for breakfast lends a pencil to a sensitive child? Do we now ban peanut butter from all houses with children of school age?

      I'm sorry, but if a child is so sensitive that mere exposure to a smell is life threatening, then they are probably never really going to be able to live normally in society. Sure, that sucks, but it just isn't going to be possible to change that.

    11. Re:Nut allergies very real by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

      What's the point of becoming gods through technology if we can't tamper with a little evolution along the way?

      That is true up to a point, which is partially why my original post was a question rather than a statement. But if we tamper with evolution too much we may have to live with the consequences, and by allowing defects to remain in our gene pool we may be causing a lot of problems for ourselves in the future.

    12. Re:Nut allergies very real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [blatantly ripped off from MyParenTime.Com]

      * There is no such thing as a "peanut/nut-free" school. You can never guarantee that a school doesn't have peanuts or nuts without bodily searching everyone and everything all the time. This has been attempted with very negative results. Even then, kids can have peanut butter on their hands from breakfast at home. We can't assume that any place is free of peanuts and nuts.

      * "Peanut/nut-free" gives everyone a feeling of false security, which in turn encourages complacency in the school about dealing with life-threatening allergies. The kids with allergies can become lax about the precautions they need to take because they think they are in a "safe" environment. Parents may think their job of educating and raising awareness (in their children and the school) is no longer necessary. School staff will direct their attention to other higher profile concerns.

      * When a ban goes into place, often the energy and effort moves from educating and raising awareness to enforcing the ban. A ban can also single out the children with allergies and make them susceptible to bullying. The children need to learn to "fit in" and have self-confidence, and not let their identity revolve around having the allergy. This will help them handle bullies and avoid being targets for bullies.

      * Telling people they can't have something because of a few is antagonistic to many parents and uncomfortable for the school. Generally our generation does not react well to the word "BAN".
      [yeah, slashdot users especially it seems!]
      When banning has been implemented, it usually takes about a year for the backlash to develop. By then, it becomes very difficult to retreat to a more "middle-of-the-road" approach because the parents who are upset are unwilling to listen or cooperate.

      * There are other life-threatening triggers such as milk, wheat or eggs, which would be impossible to ban. Where do you stop? The school must meet many needs, often from competing agendas. We must be sympathetic to what the administrators have to deal with. We will get better cooperation if we ask for things which can be implemented with a reasonable amount of effort, while accomplishing what we need.

  126. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Graff · · Score: 5, Informative
    Until such a time as they can put someone in a radio isolated room, and test how they feel with and without a transmitter turned on, with a positive correlation

    Another Wired article linked on that page, Wireless Harmless, More or Less?, talks about research doing just what you have suggested. I didn't search around for the references to the research, but here is what the article said:

    Swedish researchers found that people who claim they suffer from electrical sensitivity failed to detect the presence of electromagnetic fields in double-blind tests.

    A double-blind test, properly run, should be able to eliminate any psychosomatic effects which would bias the testing of "electronic sensitives".

  127. Amish by ruvreve · · Score: 2, Informative

    This better get modded as Informative......Is this guy aware of large sections of Pennslyvania where no electricity is used? I also know of several places in Indiana that have a large Amish community. Seriously if he is worried about his electo-medical condition why doesn't he move to a remote part of Montana. Errr wait all of Montana is remote.

  128. Cyber Cafes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in this area. There is a real problem with asian gangs, and apparently there is a serious potential for violence thats seems to center on these "cyber cafes." It seems funny to read about this, and think of computer and violent crime, but the reality is a little different here.I am actually suprised these are taking off here, they seem so 1997.

  129. Could be a fun place to live... by Monte · · Score: 1

    ...if you're a prankster. Get one of those old twelve-foot diameter sattelite dishes, put it on the roof and point it randomly to different buildings and houses. Don't bother hooking it up or anything...

    Then see how many people are complaining that your transmitter is making them see double or whatever.

  130. Easy To Fix by Judebert · · Score: 3, Funny

    As my friend Virtros suggests, don't use your mouse in a microwave!

    --

    For geek dads: Contraction Timer

  131. It's true I tells ya! by zornorph · · Score: 1

    I have a sensitivity to pulsed microwaves... everytime I put my head in the microwave and turn it on, my head burns.

    --
    http://bike.stu.ph/rides - free GPS routes available for Garmin, Magellan, GPX and Google Earth
  132. personal experience by carambola5 · · Score: 4, Troll

    After reading all the posts at my threshold, I was appalled to see a significant lack of 'interesting' or 'informative' comments. This is a serious problem for certain people, and just because you don't experience it yourself doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
    My grandmother suffers from a psychosomatic disease that makes her very ill when around certain things (i.e. televisions, CRTs, anything with a strong or synthetic odor, etc.). She has been unable for many years now to watch an entire 30 minute TV show without turning the set off during commercials. But like I said, it's purely psychosomatic... in her head.
    For example, a few years ago, our family bought her a computer for Christmas. Very slow, very lacking of features, but it allows for email, word processing, and checking of stocks, which is all she needs or ever will need. Problem was, it had a CRT, so she never used it. Ever. So as the LCD screens began coming out, I thought a change of monitors would let her use the computer. Prefacing the purchase of the LCD with information about how the screen doesn't emit the "harmful electrons" that TVs use, she agreed that it might be worth a try. Making sure that a return policy was in effect for the purchase, I bought the LCD and installed it at her house for a test run. She was able to use it without any problems and did not feel sick at all. "Sick," by the way, does not mean feeling a simple headache. We're talking shaking of extremities, loss of strength, vomiting. Even though it has been assumed (and probably proven) that electron emission has no harmful effects, my grandma doesn't care. As long as she thinks it's emitting stuff at her, she will get sick. Tell her it works like a LCD (my explanation to her: thousands of tiny light bulbs arranged in a pattern. just miniature versions of the ones that light your house), and she's completely fine.
    So please, take this seriously. Our family has had to deal with it for years now. Say what you will about the author of the article, but people do suffer from the so-called electro-pollution. Even though it may be all in their minds.

    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
    1. Re:personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "She has been unable for many years now to watch an entire 30 minute TV show without turning the set off during commercials"

      Well seeing the quality of TV these days I can not watch TV 30 mins period.

    2. Re:personal experience by RobertAG · · Score: 2

      It it possible that she's sensitive to the flickering of a CRT? I actually know some people that are bothered by a 60 Hz scan rate.

    3. Re:personal experience by chefmonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But your grandmother hasn't gone on a crusade to rid her entire city of CRTs. Haven't you noticed: you can't go to a restauant, mall, airport, or many other public places without having a television mounted somewhere.

      I agree that psychosomatic illnesses are a very real problem which needs addressing. But we need to start out by acknowedging that the problem lies with the individual, not with the item inciting their phobia. What this crackpot needs is therapy, not legislation.

    4. Re:personal experience by bwalling · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The mind is a very powerful thing. You can convince yourself (intentionally or not) of a great many things. The problem started when he start convincing others of them too. It sounds like the people in the town were just fine until this guy starting convincing them otherwise.

      I only have a problem with this guy forcing his problems on others. I have an irrational fear of seeing cinnamon raisin bread. Once, when I was a kid, I was very sick and I watched (and smelled) my mother make some cinnamon raisin bread. Now, the sight or smell of the stuff makes me very sick to my stomach. I know it's all in my head, and I don't go around telling other people that it makes me feel sick and we should put a stop to having cinnamon raisin bread available.

    5. Re:personal experience by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      apples and oranges

      Anybody that tries to pass a psychosomatic illness off as a scientifically supported effect of qualifies as a nut, and should be treated as such with high doses of disbelief and taunting.

      -

    6. Re:personal experience by horster · · Score: 1

      > She has been unable for many years now to watch an entire 30 minute TV show without turning the set off during commercials

      she should give PBS a try

    7. Re:personal experience by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

      It has to be totally psychosomatic then, cause an LCD has flourecsent tubes in it, and according to the posted site, they are just as bad as CRT's.

    8. Re:personal experience by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      Your grandmother is sick, fer shure. We have compassion. But she's not making everyone ELSE in her community give up CRTs. This nut is a public noise, and deserves to be soundly thumped a time or dozen on his head.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    9. Re:personal experience by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      What's to "cope" with? Dodging ads and lusting after LCD screens is perfectly healthy. If someone would filter ads for me and buy me a 42" Plasma TV I'd "fake" any illness they want.

    10. Re:personal experience by AbsoluteRelativity · · Score: 1

      Has she had her eyes examined or checked at all. I sometimes feel sick (dizzy, loss of strength, etc) when I look at a CRT, especially ones that run at a low frequency (50-70hz). LCDs are easier on my eyes as well. It might not be in her mind so much as a combination of her eyes and mind. Just like some people can not look at flashing red lights, and can even go into a siezure.

      --
      disclaimer : My views do not represent those of every one else in slashdot.
    11. Re:personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So please, take this seriously. Our family has had to deal with it for years now. Say what you will about the author of the article, but people do suffer from the so-called electro-pollution. Even though it may be all in their minds.

      "Even though it may be all in their minds" is the important part there. Notice your Grandmother didn't go around trying to destroy the local economy. If this guy has a problem, he should get help for it, not try to get everyone else to deal with it. If I have a hangover, I don't go forcing everyone else to leave the lights off...

  133. Mendocino is too urban by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 1

    Mendocino is not isolated enough, I'm sure he still gets bathed in radiation from Fort Bragg and all of the cars driving by on the 1. He needs to go up the coast to Shelter Cove in Humbolt county. Shelter Cove is in the middle of nowhere on California's lost coast.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    1. Re:Mendocino is too urban by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only too urban, but it's a tourist destination, and on just about any weekend of the year the tourist population downtown outnumbers the locals downtown. Many have and are using cell phones, some find Mendocino a great place to get away and work on their laptops, and some are using FRS walkie-talkies to keep mom&dad in the shops connected with the kids scampering along the bluffs. If you're going to successfully create a EMR-free zone, you need someplace much less popular than this.

  134. Re:did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by ryanwright · · Score: 2

    I know Christy, and I'll promise that it's in her friggen head.

    Of course it's in her head. Transmitters placed on roofs don't "agitate students" or "give (people) headaches." And mice certainly do not burn anyone's hands.

    This kind of insanity is why I refuse to live in a small town. Too many idiots with crazy, wild beliefs infecting each other's minds. "Did you hear about Ethel? She's really an alien from outer space! I know, I saw her hobbling around on her walker late last night. She opened the garage door with nothing but her eyes, and there was a big silver disc parked in there!" .. "Oh dear! We'd better inform Bubba the police chief right away! Hurry, the bar closes in an hour and we'll want to catch him before he's passed out in his squad car!"

    --
    -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  135. and don't forget our satellites! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they /bathe/ the earth in microwaves from coms to radar, gps to amateur band relay. c'mon. get real.

  136. Then why is he still using a telephone? by LumberJack_GSI · · Score: 1

    "I have people calling me, crying to me that they're in pain all the time, asking me where they can live," Firstenberg said.

    [subtle irony detected]

    I'm guessing that this guy is unaware that the speaker in his telephone receiver uses a magnet. And chances are that he is probaby so fearfull of EMF radiation from current model phones - that he has gone out of his way to get a +20 year old phone. You know, the ones with the HUGE magnets!

  137. Nutcases in Cali? How'd a thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hypocondria raised to a political movement. Priceless.

  138. Good point. Plus... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    ...I'd probably feel safer driving*. Plus, I wouldn't have to listen to disheveled, unemployed dot-commers struggle to maintain their self-image by blathering on their cell-phones. *Then again, all the stoned drivers might pose a problem...

  139. Thunderstorms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad they don't get many thunderstorms, it would be fun to watch the residents writhing in agony from lightening enduced EMF's. Or maybe we just should sponsor a HamFest there.

  140. Well, it is caused by too much computer exposure.. by cheapo · · Score: 1

    "This overexposure to pulsed microwaves has been a personal tragedy for me," Wagner said in an e-mail interview. "I'm left hypersensitive -- even my mouse burns my hand when I use my computer now.

    Yes, I have that too. It's called Carpel Tunnel Syndrome.

  141. I can "feel" tv's from houses away ? by CDWert · · Score: 2

    This sounds "out there" but I have been working with electronics full time since I was a kid around 77, NOW, I started racing motorcycles around the same time, my hearing SUCKS, I have a very hard time hearing "bass" and my own voice it deep so half the time I cant hear myself talk...

    That said, ever since I was a child I could "hear" or maybe its rather "feel" tv's on, monitors or other gadgets are pretty much the same. I have heard so many explanations on this, but a TV, any TV has a whine it sounds like a dog whisle almost. I can tell from outside ahouse if a TV or monitor (not so true with smaller ones) is on or not, My wife loves it as I hate a TV being on if noone is watching it. My mother thinks its freaky, I have been in 7000sq ft houses and asked where a TV was, I said a TV is on in this house somewhere, the said no, Then hour later we go down to the rec room to play pool, lo and behold someone left the TV on,

    Circut City/ Sears, what have you drives me nuts.

    You just learn to live with it, kinda like some bizzare sixth sense seen on , "Mystery Men" whats his power, he can hear if a TV is on 1/4 mile away !:)

    This, its fu**king assinine, I dont go around telling people to turn their TV's off, who the hell are they to tell me I cant do wireless where I want, ITS A FACT OF LIFE !, Maybe next we should blot out the sky so people with light sensitive eyes can roam free without sunscreen and sunglasses.

    Isnt wrapping aluminum foil around your head to stop this interference just as eccective ?

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    1. Re:I can "feel" tv's from houses away ? by neurojab · · Score: 1

      Amen to the fact of life sentiment.

      I can "sense" TVs too.. Drives me nuts... But is this electrical sensitivity? It's more easily explained than that. It's really nothing more than a buzz slightly beyond the range of normal human hearing. I think it's at 22khz, but someone correct me if I'm wrong. The sound is hard to pinpoint and such a high frequency sound carries pretty well, but the bottom line is that you'd need earplugs rather than tinfoil to stop "sensing" TVs. High frequency hearing always degrades with age, so you won't have this problem long.

      I highly recommend watching the movie "safe" for all the whackos who believe in electrical sensitivity. It's a pretty fair treatment of these issues... And for the rest of us, it's a lesson in how to make money off hypochondriacs. Anybody want to go into business making "electrical ray blockers" that you could discretely wear around your neck? Or the same thing in lotion form? Or perhaps "electric cancellation accupressure" shoe insoles? We'd strike a deal with Ron Popeil to get our commercials to break up his infomercials. All I need now is VC.

    2. Re:I can "feel" tv's from houses away ? by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 1

      You're not alone in being able to hear that. I've always been able to "hear" or feel a live CRT. The best explaination I've been able to find is the sound comes from the horizontal sync, ie. something is flexing each time the electron gun sweeps back across the screen. In an NTSC TV that happens at about 15kHz. That's high enough that it's more of a pressure than a sound, it's also high enough that a good portion of the population can't hear it.

      It seems like a reasonable explanation, and as further evidence, I can't hear the CRT in my monitor. Since it's running at 1600x1200@100Hz which puts the HSync at something close to 120kHz, well out of the range of human hearing.

    3. Re:I can "feel" tv's from houses away ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds pretty reasonable,

      I said, hear/feel, because it like, flourecsent bulbs sem to create a pressure, (Yes I can walk into a room blindfolded and tell if the lights are on , if theyre flourescent)

      It would also explain why I cant hear/feel monitors as well, my monitors, the smaller hey are the further I jack the resolution.

      High range hearing would also explain why I can hear specific sounds others cannot inside of running engines, I am 30 years old, the older I get the more acute this sense gets, contrary to what many have said about it dulling over time.

      Odd.............

    4. Re:I can "feel" tv's from houses away ? by Hydro-X · · Score: 1

      I can do that too. Everyone used to just tell me I was insane, and until now I just accepted it. But seriously, it's actually kinda fun when I hear my sister turn on my monitor and I just pop out of nowhere and say "GET AWAY FROM THAT!!!!"

  142. Microwaves that stop cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine was working at a BMW dealer near Augora when one day they had about a dozen come in on the hook. All head dead computers!!! They where all heading down the same stretch of highway!!

    Turns out, some miltary radar was out of wack and was poping BMW's ECM's. They contacted the factory and they sent them a bounch of metalic pouches to put the ECM's into.

  143. worse than audiophiles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    good god man! there -are- people less rational than audiophiles out there!

  144. And today's conspiracy theroy by heideggier · · Score: 0
    Ok, call be cynical, but I feel that there is a real danger in this, not of a effect of microwaves, if that really conserns you just move to the country, or wear foil or whatever.

    However, while wireless technology has a lot of potentual to be used to put back control of the internet back into the hands of common people, Just look at the freenets being set up in londan, New York and now in Sydney.

    It should be noted that these things are not in the interest of company's who wish to screw just because you what to set up your own mail server, and ergo, They could use something like this to deny the use, or limit the power of said networks,

    For those of you who say it could never happen (This guy is a loony), you sould note that the English government used the excuse of interfereing with emergency channels to close down a fair number of pirate radio stations and could not even produce one single event of this occuring (some of the radio tech who worked on these sites even worked for the major stations).

    --
    Pianist : Some jerk whos taught themselves how to type in rhythm
  145. Democracy! by yeastbeast · · Score: 1

    A testament to the power of highly vocal cranks. For all of our belly-aching about online rights, DMCA, etc., we have much to learn from local wackos about how to effect political change. Today Mendecino, tomorrow the world!

  146. Poor cranky freak by Buddha · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he is not wearing his aluminum foil cap tightly enough?

  147. Re:did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, let me say that I firmly believe this electrical sensitivity thing is nothing but a load of crap.

    But, having said that, I will also point out that anything connected to a computer with wires can easily radiate in the RF regions. This is one of the biggest challenges for meeting FCC requirements (Class B and Class A). When designing a computer to meet Class B (or even Class A, sometimes) all signals going to peripheral connectors (USB, Serial, printer, video, keyboard) require special treatment (RF chokes, for example) to minimize emitted radiation.

    The original source of the RF noise is typically the clock generation circuitry (this noise ends up on the power and ground nodes, so even these supposedly DC voltages can be very noisy), although fibre-channel and 100 or 1000 Mbit ethernet are also noisy.

    Oh, by the way, you have probably noticed that most video cables have a fat cylindrical object built-in to them. It makes them look like a snake that swallowed a coffee can. This is an RF choke, and without it, the computer as a system might not pass FCC Class B specs. I believe that explains why many video cables cannot be detached from the monitor, although I am not sure.

    MM
    --

  148. Aluminum foil hat? by esnible · · Score: 1

    The foil hat is the basic prop of those who believe in CIA mind control rays or electrical sensitivity.

    Who was the first nut to think of this? Was it in a well-known movie? Seriously, why do so many nuts believe foil is the answer?

  149. How do these people... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    If these people are sensitive to microwave radiation, how do they handle the microwave emmission created BY THEIR OWN BODY HEAT?

    I was at the Very Large Array in Socorro, NM, and they had a display with a microwave receiver that reacted to the heat given off by a human body.

    Tell you what: Let's let all these people congrigate in the same area, then nuke the site from orbit. The resulting rise in the average intellegance of the human race will be most dramatic.

  150. My solution by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

    My gut feeling is that these people are a bunch of california nut jobs, but who knows. We used to think that smoking was safe too, you know.

    So, have we actually done studies about these people who are supposedly "electrically sensitive?" There was a teacher in the article who said she felt nauseous whenever she was in the school with a wireless transmitter on the roof. If she is so sensitive to radio waves, why don't we put her in a shielded room with high powered radio transmitters, and run a test. We see if she can tell when she is being bombarded by radio waves. It works exactly like a hearing test, which is used to detect tinnitus and hearing loss. Just tell her to raise her hand when the radio waves make her feel sick.

    Until we prove that this is an actual condition, why is anyone listening to these nuts?

    1. Re:My solution by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      > My gut feeling is that these people are a bunch
      > of california nut jobs, but who knows. We used
      > to think that smoking was safe too, you know.

      Um, no, we didn't. Check up the term "coffin nails". It goes back much further than the Surgeon General's warning, y'know. Miriam-Webster dates it back to 1888. There's been suspicions that smoking isn't good for you as long as there's been smoking: it doesn't take a genius to figure out that breathing in large quantities of burning smoke on a daily basis might not be good for your lungs.

      Chris Mattern

  151. Mendocino Death Ray Band Plan by scoove · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe I missed this on the county's website - I believe it explains everything:

    Official Mendocino RF Band Plan
    The following band plan has been established to assist Mendocino residents in identifying their illness and subsequently locating the offending service provider. Should you require public assistance in notifying a provider to terminate service and initiate financial repairations for the harm caused, please contact our office at (707) 463-4480, or visit our website.

    BANDPLAN (Revised January 4, 2002)

    BAND: VLF

    3-10 Hz - heart disease, cancer, diabetes, strange voices, ghosts, UFOs and other unexplained apparations (see this site for scientific proof and to learn about a special device that will protect your home from these evil VLF rays)

    60 Hz - cancer, heart disease, mental illness, colds, flu, hairloss, rashes, psychotic episodes, ebola, gulf war syndrome

    BAND: HF

    26.965-27.405 MHz - Obesity, intestinal gas, intellectual stunting, unexplained cravings for tractor pulls, women with tatoos and very cheap beer

    BAND: VHF/UHF

    400-470 MHz - Uncontrollable sexual urges, strange thoughts, dishonesty, attraction to interns, voices, balding, interest in congressional office

    800-950 MHz - AIDS, Herpes and other SIDs

    BAND: SHF AND ABOVE

    2400-2472 MHz - Cancer, blisters, warts, headaches, nausea

    5300-5850 MHz - Blindness, body odor, night sweats, rashes

    1. Re:Mendocino Death Ray Band Plan by jelle · · Score: 1

      '400-470 MHz - Uncontrollable sexual urges, strange thoughts, dishonesty, attraction to interns, voices, balding, interest in congressional office'

      You've got to be kidding!

      Sounds like a crazed witch-hunt to me 'A Witch! Burn 'em! Burn 'em!'. Now where's camelot to bring the peasants to reason?

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    2. Re:Mendocino Death Ray Band Plan by Phil-14 · · Score: 1

      So 60 Hz is a problem to these people?



      Well, there's only one solution for
      that. Shut down the electrical grid.


      I suspect that every other artificial emitter
      in Mendocino emits an order of magnitude less
      power than their power grid, but I don't have
      any numbers handy.

      --
      (currently testing something about signatures here)
  152. Apparenrly even the Amish use cell phones by leighklotz · · Score: 1

    According to Amish News, the Amish do not shy away from technology, and in fact even use cell phones

    The article summarizes their position on technology:

    As is typical of the Amish, when a new technology comes along, the Amish examine its effect on the church and community. The technology should not be an intrusion into the home, but rather serve the social purposes and goals of the group. In a sense, the Amish "re-organize" the technology.
  153. Field amplitude isn't enough by roystgnr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Frequency is important, too. The earth's natural field takes tens (or is it hundreds?) of millions of years to flip around; the power line's field is changing every 1/60 of a second. There's a reason you can wrap an inductor around the line to get juice, but can't do the same around the equator.

    Don't get me wrong, I strongly doubt there's any detectable biological effects from power lines, but that's something that would have to be proven by double-blind experiment; your calculations aren't enough.

    1. Re:Field amplitude isn't enough by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      There's a reason you can wrap an inductor around the line to get juice, but can't do the same around the equator.

      There are more reasons than that! How about logistics?

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  154. A Brief Compassion Break by drooling-dog · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I agree that the symptoms these people are experiencing are almost certainly not caused by what they think they are, but on the other hand I think the ridicule they're getting here is unnecessary and mean-spirited. The possibility that the symptoms are "psychosomatic" - e.g., stress-related or whatever - does not make them any less real, and we're fools if we think that we're guaranteed never to have to go through something similar.

    That said, though, it's also true that we can't impose the burden of remediation on everyone else unless we're reasonably confident that the "true" cause has been identified, and that can only be done with the kind of controlled studies that several others have suggested here.

    But give these people a break; their suffering is real even if they're grasping for bogus explanations...

  155. All you electrons belong to us by WyldOne · · Score: 1
    And I am "electricly sensitive" - I use electricity like air. Better than caffine in the morning. To tell you the truth that buzz in the morning gets a whole new meaning when the alarm goes off. I need it, I want it, BWAHAHAHAHA. I have to rub my socks across the carpeting at work when I need a quick fix. It's hell on installing memory chips, but who cares any way - they're cheap!

    More power to me, all the better to frag you with!

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  156. Computer Waves? by danwatt · · Score: 1

    ...English teacher Christy Wagner said her students suddenly became "irritable and easily distracted" and that she herself felt nauseous whenever she was at the school. In September, she took a medical leave.
    "This overexposure to pulsed microwaves has been a personal tragedy for me," Wagner said in an e-mail interview. "I'm left hypersensitive -- even my mouse burns my hand when I use my computer now."


    Question: Since computers put out a significant amount of electical waves, at least significant for people who may be "sensitive", why are they using computers at all? Don't forget power lines, which radiate a lot more (and some say cause cancer)...

  157. Doesn't this sound a little familiar by mobiux · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like Eddie, the brother-in-law from National Lampoons Christmas Vacation.
    "Had a metal plate in my head, but everytime I would fire up the microwave, I'd piss my pants and forget who I was for a half an hour."

  158. The only answer to these nuts... by gnovos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is by faking them out. Put them in a room with a fake transmitter and tell them that everytime the green light goes on, they are going to get zapped and you will watch thier reactions. Except, in reality, you actually zap them when the light is OFF. Then after they finish having thier seizures or whatever when the EMF radation is off and they seem to recover when it's on, go publish your report saying that too little radiation is bad for people's health.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:The only answer to these nuts... by nolife · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing but I think you would have to be a little more subtle. Have you ever heard electical contactors shutting in a big controller? That chunk--chunk sound? Have this in another room and make it audible but not obvious. Tell them that you are cycling power to a transmitting antenna via wires traveling through the room at random times. At the same time you cycle the contacts dim the lights ever so slightly in the examining room, turn them back up when you simulate the test being over. Even better would be to simulate the noise that a high power transformer makes under load, the humming/buzzing noise. I do not know how to simulate this though.
      I think these would be a true placebo to test with.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  159. IHBT, but ICR by virg_mattes · · Score: 5, Informative

    Okay, I can't resist.

    > Microwaves are intentional radiation and are used to TRANSMIT power, not always to simply carry a signal.

    Microwaves are EM waves with a certain wavelength, not "intentional radiation" as you've stated. The largest generator of microwave radiation around is the Sun. Microwaves that are generated outside of microwave ovens are used almost exclusively for communications (which is not to say they aren't harmful, but not for the reason you state). Microwaves in ovens are EM waves with the specific wavelength that best transmits energy to water molecules. The microwaves used in tower transmitters is not. Also, microwave transmitters put out microwave beams that don't attenuate very much. It's why they're used; the signal can be thrown farther than a simple broadcast like radio waves because the beam stays cohesive, so most of your power goes down the transmit path, whereas with radio, most of the power goes everywhere but the receiving antenna. It's also why you need line-of-sight to use microwave communications.

    The simple fact is that exposure to microwaves in the outside world is not increased to any real degree by the use of microwave transmitters. The exposure you get from standing in range of a microwave tower is smaller by powers of ten than the amount you're getting from the sunlight.

    Of course, all of this discussion is offtopic to the original article, as they're not talking about exposure to microwave radiation. The original article is about someone working to eliminate broadcast transmitters to reduce public exposure to radio waves. The whole "electrically sensitive" thing seems to be a misnomer for sensitivity to induced magnetic fields, and I'm not sure why it's part of the discussion, but then sensibility never figured highly in these matters.

    Virg

    P.S. The law to which you refer has to do with preventing local governments from passing laws that would have excessive externalities. The main reasoning is the threat from a midwest community to prohibit satellite owners from sending down satellite transmissions within its confines. This would have precluded any satellite transmissions to anywhere in North America, as most satellites use a footprint of that size to transmit. And before you get all bent about how that exposes you to radiation, keep in mind that you need a concentrator (a dish) just to get enough signal to detect.

    1. Re:IHBT, but ICR by dnoyeb · · Score: 0

      Microwaves are EM waves with a certain wavelength, not "intentional radiation" as you've stated. What does their wavelength have to do with wether they were used intentionally or not? Power line radiation is incidental. In fact it siphons off power and is undesirable. HOwever, microwave radiation is ALWAYS intentional just like radio waves and cell phone signals. THese are intentional. Power line radiation, CRTs, and the like, those devices main purpose is not to generate radio waves. That was my point. The largest generator of microwave radiation around is the Sun. Microwaves that are generated outside of microwave ovens are used almost exclusively for communications (which is not to say they aren't harmful, but not for the reason you state). The Sun is not without its harmfull effects. ANyone who claims otherwise is foolish. I dont think I said why microwave radiation is harmful, just that it is capable of being so. All in all, the bottom line is wether I have a choice or not in what type of radiation I am exposed too in a free country. Seems like the money says no. We should establish a maximum power level which can be found in any residential neighborhood and argue over that. Not argue over wether or not radio waves at whatever frequency or wavelength can be harmful.

  160. Christy Wagner by Monte · · Score: 1, Insightful

    She of the burning mouse-palm evidently didn't mind letting her students cruise the Web back in '96. One of the goals of a course was to "USE TECHNOLOGY and the INTERNET to communicate, cooperate and write with students in other places". Hmm. I wonder if she's apologized to all those poor twitchin' kids she led astray?

  161. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

    Bah, I'm out of work at the moment.. maybe I should get into the business of building large faraday cages around people's homes :P

  162. have you ever been to mendocino? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mendocino's whole "thing" is that they're __not__
    modern. they're "1880's"

    no fast food.
    no chain stores.
    lots of old buildings.
    lots of little shops for tourists.

    plus: they're more 1880's than you are.

    and they won't let you forget it.
    so this whole article doesn't mean shit.

  163. Actually, he should move to Green Bank, WV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Home of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory.
    NRAO

    Of course, he probably wouldn't believe those huge antennas were actually receivers.

  164. Re:did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by dakoda · · Score: 1

    maybe it was an athlon powered mouse, and the heatsink fell off :^)

  165. Mendocino wireless internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These microwaved protesters whip up their fears on a radio station that continuously blasts my house with radio frequency energy from less than two miles distance. And they are getting burns from their computer mouse! hmmm Where shall I start protesting?

  166. Mendocino codename by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I alone in being mildly amused that Mendocino was the codename for one of the Celeron cores - one of those evil computer things that causes so much fear and loathing in, er, Mendocino?

  167. Re:did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THere are just as many whackos in cities. They just get lost in the shuffle.

  168. It's a court system, not a synagogue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And speaking of nuts, how about Doctor Michael Jacobsen of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, he wanted movie theater popcorn regulated.

    Hey, all you goofs, it's a court system, not a synagogue. Just think what the world would be like if Jon Katz ran it. Gawd, it'd be like shooting Palestinians.

  169. What he needs is a Copper Mesh Hamster Ball by Paradox · · Score: 1

    Yes, a human-sized copper mesh hamster ball.
    That way, he'd be separated from society for the nutbar that he is, and also be able to avoid the evil zingy rays he fears so much.

    Hmm, I wonder if these "electrically sensitive" people own hamsters. It may not work on the human scale, but I could make a killing selling them to the pets of these hysterics.

    You should always profit from lunatics. That's the American way, anyways.

    --
    Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
  170. Never happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all the Breatharians up there, I don't see how you are going to get anything resembling mandatory consumption of anything.

  171. Sometimes, there is a bit of reason... by amccall · · Score: 2
    A couple years ago my little brother had a pace maker implanted. Now, earlier versions of pace makers required that the user avoid a great many of what we would consider "normal" activities.

    Fortunately, this is no longer the case. However, when he had the pacemaker put in, we were given a set of rules regarding things he could and could not do, among these were recomendations that he not allow himself get too near to wireless devices. This is not to say no wireless networks in the house at all - but to simply not place himself in a manner where he was extremely close to such a thing. (They actually choose the side of your body to place the PaceMaker, based on your dominant hand - such that you can hold a cell phone in your other hand, having little impact on the pacemaker itself, as well as to reduce the strain on the device during movement.)

    Newer devices are even less restricted - and as time goes on, I imagine many of the restrictions above will be reduced or eliminated. (Maybe future versions will actually talk to wireless networks.. hehe.) In any event, this was to simply answer your question about whether or not there were actually people that could be considered sensitive to RF. I can't imagine anybody requiring the extreme that was mentioned in this article.

    --
    ------ 24.5% slashdot pure
  172. Don't be so quick to ridicule... by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ok, so I have just read every post here and I must say that nearly every single post is just dismissing these people as "nutjobs" and laughing at them.

    What no-one has really done is to consider different parts of the EM spectrum- I mean- not many people think that the power lines in their home make them ill, but a hell of a lot of people (myself included) feel actual physical symptoms from using mobile phones. We're not talking about the discomfort from pressing a piece of plastic on your head here, but weird heat and tingling sensations in the eye for example.

    There have been mixed findings from mobile studies, but some have found elevated blood pressure in subjects, disturbed sleep if mobile left on bedside-cabinet etc.

    Like someone else posted- we used to think smoking was safe. If you said to someone then that smoking could kill them, they'd say "No way! See, I'm smoking now and I feel fine!"

    Police in the uk have been ordered to limit mobile calls to 5 minutes or under, as have some large companies, since they don't want to get sued.

    I'm just saying- we don't know what effect the upper frequencies like 2.4Ghz are having on us, and the recent explosion in use of this frequency is cause for at least lots of proper scientific studies that mobile phone companies can't tamper with.

    graspee

    1. Re:Don't be so quick to ridicule... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOW THE FUCK IS THIS A TROLL?

      I am completely sick of people bitchslapping posts they don't agree with. It doesn't even seem that metamoderation is helping the situation.

  173. Hot Damn!!!! by Anonymous+C0wherder · · Score: 1
    800-950 MHz - AIDS, Herpes and other SIDs

    I don't hafta tell my wife where I *really* got that rash now.

    1. Re:Hot Damn!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't hafta tell my wife where I *really* got that rash now.

      Makes you think twice about putting the cell phone in your pants pocket.

  174. Take your portable blue tooth tranceiver to Mend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should have a big get together in the city (preferably close to his house) and have everyone bring all the portable electronic devices they can carry!

  175. Oh, I love it! by Paul+Neubauer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not this guy isn't a kook, but this argument has a problem. People tend to be 'sensitive' to ionizing radiation in that it affects them (radiation poisoning for nontrivial exposures) but they can't tell that they're being exposed until well past the danger point.. So people in places where there might possibly be accidental exposure get to carry some kind of radiation sensor around with them.

    --
    I don't subscribe to RMS's GNUtopian vision.
  176. Your sig doesn't work by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    Actually, it works only for you. Try this.

    1. Re:Your sig doesn't work by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Thanks, it should work now.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  177. Ha Ha! by gnovos · · Score: 2

    Well, of course "Wired" would run this story! "Wireless" is the LAST thing that the want!

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  178. Some of those are real by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    Drinking lead can cause real health problems, especially among children. That is actually my new favorite theory explaining the decline of the Roman empire, all the aristocracy drank from marvelous plumbing made of, yup, lead pipes.

    And besides, I saw on the X-Files how there's a big government conspiracy to cover up the health effects of power lines :)

    1. Re:Some of those are real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the massive mercury poisoning of the water supply by Roman foundries.

    2. Re:Some of those are real by thorgil · · Score: 1

      The pipes in Rome where indeed made out of lead. However it did not matter as the inside surface of the pipes became covered in with oxides, salts and other stuff preventing the lead to solute into the water.

      besides... Everybody drank from the water.... not just the aristocrats.

      /

      --
      Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
    3. Re:Some of those are real by Howie · · Score: 1

      Drinking lead will give you third-degree burns, and very sore lips, aside from anything else.

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
  179. I went to that High School by soybean · · Score: 1

    Maybe that explains why I'm so fucked up!

  180. [OT] TV noise by xTown · · Score: 1
    Oh my GOD I thought I was the only one. My wife thinks I'm crazy when I tell her that the constant whine from the TV and the computer monitor gets annoying. "What whine?" she says.


    And it's not a hearing issue, either, or at least I don't think so. I spent some time listening to and playing extremely loud music, and I know I have hearing loss, but this stuff still comes in loud and clear.

    1. Re:[OT] TV noise by freeweed · · Score: 2
      Nope, there're lots of people who are sensitive to this. I've been able to tell if a TV was turned on since I can remember (it was fun telling the teacher in like grade 2 that the TV wasn't on, and she didn't believe me until she realized it was unplugged and the switch didn't do anything :)

      My current girlfriend is the first person I've met with the same level of sensitivity, but beyond the obviously broken tubes that anyone can hear whine, it really isn't a big deal. Just turn on some music to drown it out :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:[OT] TV noise by d-e-w · · Score: 1

      The computer and television whine are on the high end of the sound range. You can have loss in some areas of the range, and/or be overly sensitive in other areas of the range.

      The TV/Comp whine is about on the order of a dog whistle--on the very outside "upper" range of human hearing, but not inaudible for all humans. Children tend to be more sensitive than adults, and women more sensitive then men.

  181. Re:I wonder what his comment would be to the fact. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, that actually sounds like a good idea. It would atleast keep the glare off my CRT.

    If something like that were to happen, I'm sure it would be the place for goths and hackers.

    I think I'll just settle with my basement.

  182. Just another day in Nothwest Nowhere. by soybean · · Score: 1

    Mendo has always been a magnet for nut jobs. I remember once when I was in class (yes at that very high school) this group of people from Santa Fe burst into the classroom dressed up as aliens preaching some sort of new age alien love bullshit. Our teacher let them go on for a bit then asked them to leave. It turned out that they were affiliated with the Universal Life Church and all as crazy as it gets.

    So I guess that the only thing that makes this story of stoned burnouts ranting on the sidewalk in front of The Mendocino Bakery new is that this time they are ranting about "wireless technology".

  183. Re:I wonder what his comment would be to the fact. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah you wacko. And you havent really read
    physics and biology havent you?

    Just look at your negro friend. You look more
    and more like them.

    Observe:
    This post contains multiple menings, depending
    on your mode and intelligence. If you can only
    see one meaning, your disease is being American
    and if you can see to many your desease is being
    an Israelite.

    Now go Fuck yourself.

    Hmm, did I say my toilet paper is red, blue and
    white with stripes and stars?

    Best Whishes.

  184. The Test Procedure by gila_monster · · Score: 1

    "Try putting them through an experiment in an environment secure & devoid of radio activity (say, a bunker somewhere with a guassian cage around it)"

    1 Place electrically sensitive subjects in a gaussian cage bunker.

    2 Lock it.

    3 Leave.

    If you're a stickler for proper scientific method, feel free to check on them when you're sure they are too old to further pollute the gene pool.

    --
    Ad luna, Alicia! Ad luna!
  185. Re:even Lud would be embarrassed by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a life! Oh, it's the (insert stereotypical religious, ethnic, sexual [orientation], political [affiliation] slur here)! Maybe when someone passes an ordinance to keep out backwards ass, ignorant, mouth breathing, F***s the rest of us will finally have piece.

    It may seem (read be) ridiculous to most of us, but Firstenberg took a stand. And he obviously wasn't alone. So regardless of how stupid it may seem, it's happenning has nothing to do with his being Jewish you prat!

  186. Three words: by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    Only in California. Articles like these make me feel sorry for the poor bastards that have to live in the same state as these people. And they vote, too.

    Seriously, if they're so electrically sensitive, why haven't they put up a giant umbrella to blot out the biggest E-M noisemaker in the solar system (more commonly known as "the sun")? Or why haven't they moved closer to the equator to make sure they're as far away from the aurora borealis as possible?

    I'm willing to bet that, within five years of the first viable fusion reactor going on-line, somebody in California will have neutrino-related health problems. And THEN where will they move?

  187. Money for the Highschool by jrinderle · · Score: 1


    Is there a place to donate money to the highschool radio station? I'd be willing to give a few bucks to help their cause.

    I think some cellular / wireless company out there should sponser the station, if they get to share the tower.

    Better yet, lets construct a really massive antenna, sit outside city limits, and blast the residents with radiation.

    What a moron! My question is, does he have electricity in his home? Does he use the telephone? Does he drive a car? Anything using electricity creates an EMF.

  188. Who else thought it funny that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the local newspaper is called the "Beacon"?

    Better shut that baby down! :-)

  189. what is it with pda's by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    I keep hearing people in the other stall in the bathroom using their fucking pda's. Sitting there and 'Beep, beep, tap tap tap'. C'mon, now that's just an inappropriate use of a pda. You don't need to get up to the minute stock quotes or save the galaxy from aliens when you're taking your morning dump.

    1. Re:what is it with pda's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      face it dude, they're looking at porn on their PDAs. might as well leave the bathroom as fast as possible before you start hearing the grunting. (unless you're into that kind of thing if you know what i mean)

  190. Contrary to Popular Belief by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1
    See the World Health Organizations's site on International EMF Project

    From the Factsheet No. 263, Oct 2001

    "ELF fields commonly found in our environment are normally much lower than the strongest electric currents naturally occurring in the body such as those that control the beating of the heart"

    AND
    "ELF magnetic fields were classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans based on epidemiological studies of childhood leukaemia."

    <opinion> Contrary to (un)popular belief, the strength of EMF required to do *any* harm to living tissue is not a matter of debate, you'd have to practically sleep with a power-pole in your ass and a cell-site antenna in your head to even *think* of having a chance of getting cancer. Frequency, power-at-distance, and exposure time/period are the factors to consider in any such study of biological effects. In other news... pseudo-sciencists around the world suggest you get Mind-Guard (TM) if you don't want those government mind-control rays.&lt/opinion> =P
    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
  191. Re:even Lud would be embarrassed by this by rapid+prototype · · Score: 0

    calling someone jewish does not necessary mean that you think that being jewish has anything to do with their actions. like if i said 'reverend jesse jackson' did so and so, and someone started yelling at me that his actions have nothing to do with his being a reverend.

    in this case, yeah, maybe it was meant as a slur, but don't be so oversensitive. people call me 'that crazy jewish guy' all the time, doesn't bother me one bit. and i'm not even really jewish.

    -rp

  192. I Won't Mod, I'll Reply by virg_mattes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Please, you idiots making fun of these people, you are true idiots and it is becouse you are not complaining on the companies instead. They should create products not transmitting harmful radiation. They should find alternative methods of doing same things that doesnt HARM humans.

    There are some real problems with this. Creating products that don't create harmful radiation (based on this fellow's definition of "dangerous") would require them to build devices that don't use electricity, since he's complaining about any radiant EM field, and these fields are induced by electric current. Needless to say, few people (in the modern world, anyway) are willing to give up the use of electricity to protect themselves from EM fields.

    > And becouse, you are the #1 on the list to become electricsensitive. And many of you are that already Your ears getting hot? It feels like sand in your eyes? Dry skin? And many more things that are signs of electricsensitivity.

    The problem here is that of all of the sysmptoms listed, none of them (and no combination of them) seems exclusive to the condition. Moreover, the only backing information cited was a vague reference to a Swedish study, and the facts from the only study data the Swedes ever published stated that people who claimed to be electrically sensitive could not detect and were not demonstrably affected by EM fields in double blind tests. This would tend to refute Mr. Firstenburg's claims, but strangely the web site makes no mention of the results, only the study. This leads me to believe that more proof is needed about the causal link of bad health and EM exposure before it makes sense to start in on lifestyle changes.

    Virg

    1. Re:I Won't Mod, I'll Reply by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 2
      ...Needless to say, few people (in the modern world, anyway) are willing to give up the use of electricity to protect themselves from EM fields........This leads me to believe that more proof is needed about the causal link of bad health and EM exposure before it makes sense to start in on lifestyle changes.

      Couldn't agree with you more.

      Funny thing, this phenomenon (freaking out over EM radiation), has been following a somewhat cyclic pattern lately. Having taken several EE fields and antennas course, I had one excellent instructor who pointed this fact out to me. The cycle is roughly every seven years that people start freaking out and raising concerns about EM radiation. Go back seven years and it was the start of cell phones; another seven it was the huge power lines going across country (and through some backyards); another seven and it was those new 'cordless' phones in your house; etc..

      It seems around every seven years or so a furor is raised over something new in the technological realm killing us off with EM radiation. Sometimes much is said, sometimes it makes a few late night news slots, then it dies off....until the next new thing sparks almost the same controversy all over again.

      The problem is, we are so bathed in EM fields from so many sources, it is impossible to track it down to any particular source. Not to mention (as the poster did above) that the symptons listed are so vague, the percentage is high that they are caused by other environmental factors (natural or man-made). If you are so worried about EM fields: don't drive your car; get rid of your tv, radio, computer, cell phone, cordless phone; no more refridgerator for you; toss out the electric shaver; better not live in a house fed with electricity in case you pick up from the wiring in the house; and so on...

      And there has been various studies for over the last 25 or so years that have yet to make any clear connections. Funny thing, seeing how the freaking out is kind of cyclic (roughly 7 years between outbreaks), maybe there is some truth to their complaining after all. The complaining cycle could be representative of a large sine wave, oscillating up and down - not quite unlike a component of an EM wave.

      - A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.
      - I am not an Electrical Engineer, I just play one on tv.
      - AC
    2. Re:I Won't Mod, I'll Reply by ijx · · Score: 1
      Needless to say, few people (in the modern world, anyway) are willing to give up the use of electricity...

      Have we learned nothing from Final Fantasy VII? Our reliance on Materia, erm, Electricity will be our undoing!

    3. Re:I Won't Mod, I'll Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sunspots?

    4. Re:I Won't Mod, I'll Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fool! It was Mako power or whatever, not materia, that was their undoing.

    5. Re:I Won't Mod, I'll Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you got FFVII and FFVIII confused. In FFVIII, people's reliance on junctioning GF's caused memory loss. FFVII was about Makou power being drawn from the eath :-)

  193. DISABILTY!?!?!?! by Picass0 · · Score: 2

    Electrical sensitivity is not recognized by the U.S. medical establishment, and Firstenberg refused to disclose his diagnosis, which allows him to collect disability income.

    For cryin' out f*ckin' loud! I'm paying tax money for this flake to sit at home on his ass and fire up?

    These people better hope there's never a thunderstorm nearby. Do you know how much RF noise fills the air during even a modest storm? It'll kill 'em all. Or maybe not. Because there's NOTHING WRONG WITH THEM! They just want to live in some hippie commune.

    What a great example of mass hysteria. Ultra-liberals have moved from pushing smokers around to picking new targets.

    I wonder if Firstenberg owns an SUV to haul his " ...bevy of devices to detect radio frequencies, including a meter that gauges electrical, magnetic and microwave fields." Probably not. I bet he rides a bike, and his next "illness" will be an allergy to gas fumes.

  194. Didn't John Walker Come From Mendicino? by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

    1) Didn't John Walker Come From Mendicino?
    2) This guy is from Mendicino.

    Conclusion: This guy is Taliban.

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    1. Re:Didn't John Walker Come From Mendicino? by metachimp · · Score: 1

      No, Walker is from Fairfield, I believe. I think his Dad now lives in Marin county somewhere. Anyway, Fairfield is between Sacramento and San Francisco, out in the valley, near Davis. In Solano county. Go get a map, fool.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  195. Re:Pacemakers and Java by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    Anyone ever carefully read the EULA for Java? You aren't allowed to use Java to control pacemakers or nuclear facilities.

    I don't know why, but I just found that hilarious.

    I know what you mean about pacemakers. They always put those signs on the scanners at libraries that check to see if you're taking a book without checking it out warning that they might interfere with pacemakers. I always wondered how they decided to install them.

    "We have this new device that prevents people from stealing our books."
    "Great, lets install it."
    "There's one catch, it kills old people."
    "Oh who the hell cares about that? Install the damn thing. And make sure this old person killing device runs on Java."

  196. Faraday Cage by shepd · · Score: 1

    So who's gonna put up a faraday cage around the city? I really don't think the state will be footing the bill for this.

    I mean, you have to block short-waves, right? You wouldn't want those cancer causing short-waves burning out your mind, now, would you?

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  197. Ebola !?! by mjphil · · Score: 1
    60 Hz - cancer, heart disease, mental illness, colds, flu, hairloss, rashes, psychotic episodes, ebola, gulf war syndrome.


    Um... 60hz is that little plug in your wall. Did I miss the NY Times story about the mass ebola epidemic running rampant for the last 100 years?

    Why couldn't it cause impotence so these dopes don't breed?
  198. I must be electrically sensitive.... by mblase · · Score: 2

    - My computer monitor gives me eyestrain.
    - Microwaved convenience food makes me nauseous.
    - Fluorescent lighting produces a humming sound in my ears.
    - Cable television makes my brain hurt.

  199. A Lesson To Be Learned by Arandir · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mendocino, the entire country, is an object lesson for every Californian. Humbolt the city, and the rest of the country, was once staunchly conservative with a thriving economy in lumber. Than Cal State Humbolt set up shop. Thousands of students with empty heads showed up. Ivory tower professors showed up to fill their heads with ivory tower thoughts. Then the students started voting. Humbolt became a liberal mecca. The cancer spread throughout the county. Now Humbolt's economy is based on lawsuits and welfare checks.

    Don't let this happen to your community. It happened to Santa Cruz. It happened to La Jolla. It happened even to Berkeley and Palo Alto, both conservative havens in the liberal bay area...until the voting age was lowered to toddlerhood. It's going to happen to Merced with the new UC. The only place this hasn't happened is when the university is in a big city. The old saying goes "if you're not liberal at 18 you have no heart, if you're not conservative at 68 you have no brain." Well, move a major university to a small town and you suddenly get more heart than brains.

    I'm sure the guy in this story has his heart in the right place, but he certainly has no brain!

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    1. Re:A Lesson To Be Learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "move a major university to a small town and you suddenly get more heart than brains"

      Do I understand correctly that you're claim is that education makes you stupid?

    2. Re:A Lesson To Be Learned by metachimp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Now Humbolt's economy is based on lawsuits and welfare checks


      I dispute this. Humboldt's economy, on the books is still largely based on lumber. Of course, off the books it's marijuana, and everybody knows it. The cops, city government and local business all receieve kickbacks for looking the other way when it comes to grass, California's number one cash crop. What makes Humboldt and Mendocino counties such a haven for layabouts and shady folks is the drug trade. Go to Garberville one fall weekend, and you'll see the streets lined with Mercedes-Benzs. Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with this, but pot is what saved Northern California, and much of rural Cascadia for that matter, after the timber industry there went south (as it sould have).


      Therefore, it makes sense that a lot of these 'electro-sensitive' people live up there, stoners are more paranoid than most folks. You have tons of orthorexics there, too. It's a beautiful place, but there are some awfully freaky people up there.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
    3. Re:A Lesson To Be Learned by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Education makes you smart. But students have zero to little life experience. Psychologically, late adolescence (your early college years) is the time one undergoes a complete reevalution of their taught values. Reevaluation of core cultural values with zero life experience coupled results in heads full of mush.

      They have their hearts in the right place. But they have no "brains" in terms of how things really work in the world. Colleges become communities of Dennis Moore's.

      I'm not denigrating the young. I am merely observing. If you look at your typical college campus you will find that it has a much greater percentage of extreme political viewpoints than non-college communities.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  200. Re:even Lud would be embarrassed by this by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
    people call me 'that crazy jewish guy' all the time, doesn't bother me one bit. and i'm not even really jewish.

    Maybe that's why it doesn't bother you?
    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  201. Burn the radios! by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 1

    they poisoned my water supply, killed my crops and made my cattle sick!

    burn them!

    love greg

    --
    sig - .
  202. He just trying to sell them odds and ends by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    Like that sulphur to make them stink like rotten eggs all the time (good thing they are gonna live in a specified area) and his book.

  203. Rush Limbaugh comedy fodder! by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    I think this action is going make it comedy fodder for Rush Limbaugh and other conservative hosts, sad to say.

    It just proves that some Californians live up to the pejorative moniker of Land of Fruits and Nuts. They should be more concerned about things like low altitude air pollution.

  204. I've felt it, but not that it hurt... by slykens · · Score: 2
    I think hese people are wack jobs but I have felt something similar.

    I had the fun experience of helping a friend set up his ISP's wireless network and on top of the tallest building in town is located an 800 MHz cell site. When working up there in proximity to the cell site (ie 15-25 feet) I could definately feel something odd, but when I went back downstairs I was fine and I have no after effects.

    Exposure to high-intensity RF can do funny things to you, just look at chicken in the microwave, but the regular stuff we all live in won't hurt, much. ;)

    As a side note there was a sign up there that said something to the effect of, "WARNING: This area exceeds FCC limits for human exposure to RF."

  205. Re:even Lud would be embarrassed by this by rapid+prototype · · Score: 0

    sarcasm really is lost in text.

  206. bad ions by Barbarian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stories like this remind me of when my mother's friend's son got a cable modem in his room a few years ago, and suddenly was unable to get up at any reasonable time in the morning to go to school. Since they thought I was a computer expert, I was quizzed if the cable modem could be emitting "bad ions" that were damaging his health. I didn't have the heart to say that it wasn't bad ions, just staying up late downloading porn and playing Quake that was the problem.

  207. The Time Machine 2: The Eloi Pull An Animal Farm by yerricde · · Score: 1

    The rest of them can have the surface of this planet we will send up fruit baskets every once in awhile and we will be sure to visit when we are hungry after a long day's work.

    Oh, The Time Machine by H. G. Wells. How precious (yes, the Eloi from The Time Machine look like Precious Moments). You do know that you'll have to spray drugs on the food to keep the Eloi from learning everything you do and revolting against you? You do know that in the forthcoming sequel, the Eloi rise up and pull an Animal Farm on your asses?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  208. What It Is by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Two things. First, some people use their PDA to read (get an article or book on the PDA, then head for the "reading" room). Second, there's no need for an apostrophe after PDA. "PDAs" works.

    Virg

  209. Re:even Lud would be embarrassed by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that it matters, but I'm not Jewish either. If the guy is a crackpot, then so be it, I have no problem with that.

    I do however have a problem with:
    "Firstenberg is just another Jewish nut, using the government to impose his values on others."

    "Whether it's Greenpeace, the Nature Conservancy, or PETA, the Jewish crazies are trying to bury civilization."

    So what if his name were Smith? Would he just be another crazy WASP...? Probably not!

    Who is it that is trying to "bury civilization"? Is it the "nut" with the EMF-intolerance, or the person who needs to make a point by hiding behind bigotry?

  210. Play their game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just create a sugar pill, give it a fancy name, and say it "cures electrosensitivity". Sell it and make millions off all the idiots who think they have a problem. If you think the placebo effect doesn't work, consider Alex Chiu's rings, those bracelets they advertise on live365 iRadio, and OTC pain killers...

  211. This defines "junk scientists" perfectly by MtViewGuy · · Score: 3

    It's people like this that define the phrase junk science. (shaking head!)

    Personally, if electricity were causing cancer and other dehabilitating conditions, they would have found out like by 1910, twenty years after electric power generation and power transmission by overhead wires became common in the northeastern USA.

    Another good example is the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. The radioactive release on a per person basis near that plant is the equivalent of getting radiation at altitude from a New York City to Los Angeles jet flight of 5.5 hours.

    Now you know why I dislike the majority of the environmental movement--they don't bother to test their theories before making their conclusions at times.

    1. Re:This defines "junk scientists" perfectly by GooseKirk · · Score: 1

      >...radioactive release on a per person basis...

      Any refs for this? How was this calculated? I don't know the first thing about 3 Mile Island, but my impression is that it wasn't so much the actual release that freaked people out as the potential the situation had for releasing a whole lot more.

    2. Re:This defines "junk scientists" perfectly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate picking nits. I agree that they're a bunch of crackpots. These crackpots are, however, as much a part of the environmental movement as ketchup is a vegetable.

      Anytime you have a reactor meltdown/release of radioactive material, you are going to have paranoia and hysteria, and with that paranoid science. It's just that many things, like lead-based paints weren't considered damaging until decades after their release. Sure short-term studies showed nothing wrong. It took the long-term studies to show the lead building up in the body over time, and the statistical evidence to show a danger.

      Phen-Phen passed FDA approval. Was the FDA guilty of "Junk Science"? Probably not. FDA passes all kinds of drugs, most safe and effective. It's just that the heart-valve defects didn't show up until a large enough sample group took the drug for a long enough period of time.

      Merely saying something is "safe" until proven otherwise is a fallacy of logic often exercised by those with a certain political bent. If it could be proved to be unsafe now or in the future, then it clearly was never safe in the first place.

    3. Re:This defines "junk scientists" perfectly by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      If I remember correctly, there were some scientific experiments where they measured the amount of radiation received on a US cross-country flight in daytime by jet airplane flying at over 30,000 feet. The result was quite surprising: the amount of alpha, beta and gamma radiation recorded on just one flight was surprisingly high.

      I'll have to look up the references to those experiments, which I believe were done in the early 1970's.

    4. Re:This defines "junk scientists" perfectly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, if electricity were causing cancer and other dehabilitating conditions, they would have found out like by 1910, twenty years after electric power generation and power transmission by overhead wires became common in the northeastern USA.

      How is this personal?

    5. Re:This defines "junk scientists" perfectly by M-G · · Score: 2

      Phen-Phen passed FDA approval

      Sort of. First, it's Fen-Phen, which is short for the combination of fenfluramine and phentermine. Both drugs were approved as appetite supressants for short-term use (a few weeks). One was approved in 1959, the other in 1973. It was only in the late '90's that doctors starting prescribing the two drugs in combination for long-term use. This is "off-label use", IOW, it was being prescribed in a manner that differed from that described by the FDA approval. Heart-valve defects showed up only in those patients who took the combination for prolonged periods.

  212. Re:Actually, they do care by CharlieG · · Score: 2

    You are dealing with a "Part 15" device - aka, unlicensed. Part 15 devices use PARTS of the RF spectrum as secondary users - They have the resposability not to interfere with the licensed PRIMARY users of that part of the spectrum, and it's THEIR problem if they receice interference

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  213. Oooh... maybe Johnny Mnemonic was right... by Miguelito · · Score: 1

    maybe there really is a Nerve Attenuation Syndrome (was that the name?)..

    Or maybe these are just a bunch of crackpots.

    Who wants to bet that if they'd put the antenna on the school, and said it was broadcasting, even when it wasn't, that the teacher would've complained? It's likely all a psychosomatic thing.

    --
    - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    1. Re:Oooh... maybe Johnny Mnemonic was right... by BeeShoo · · Score: 1

      Ok, so I'm nitpicking...
      And before anyone asks, no, I'm not a doctor... but, I've watched someone playing one on TV.

      A psychosomatic disease has real physical symptoms that can be diagnosed (typically caused by stress and exhaustion from worrying about something). What people normally refer to as psychosomatic is actually called a conversion reaction. No, it doesn't have the same ring to it, but...

      Perhaps it just needs a good marketing campaign...

  214. Aurally Sensitive?!? by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Interesting turn of phrase, that. The medical term for it is "good high-range hearing" and I understand, as I'm also able to pick up the high-pitched sound given off by old picture tubes. The difference between this and the statement of electric sensitivity is that hearing high-pitched sounds can be proven (and has been) with a simple microphone, speaker and oscilloscope.

    Virg

  215. Is this "Technology" or "It's funny. Laugh!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the article belongs to the "Tech" category at all... Should be "Anti-technology" :-)

  216. No such thing as a "microwave free zone" by evil_one · · Score: 2

    Telecommunication and television satellites ALL paint all of the continental US with microwaves, and many of the DTH satellites are 120 watts. Regardless, there are 30+ satellites all painting the us with a minimum of 40 watts of microwave energy each. This town is no exception.

    --
    Desperation is a stinky cologne
  217. This is hardly new by AB3A · · Score: 1
    You could find shielded underwear in a Sears catalog as far back as the early 20th century. Back then, ignorance about this issue would have been quite understandable.

    Today, it's nothing short of laughable. If someone could actually prove that any such electrosensitivity existed, they'd be strong candidates for a Nobel Prize. At the very least they'd have discovered something new in molecular biology, if not physics itself.

    Despite that obstacle, this issue has continued to resurface year after year ever since that yellow journalist, Paul Broduer wrote "The Zapping of America" and Wertheimer and Leper conducted their seriously flawed and irreproducible study back in the 1970s.

    It seems to me these folks must think innuendo is a valid criterion for evaluating scientific research (Broduer used this technique very nicely). Since it's awfully hard to meet their demands in this country, I invite them to join the Taliban in their nice Faraday cages at Camp X-Ray. I hear the accomodations aren't too shabby...

    --
    Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
  218. Oi! What is it with acronyms? by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    When the hell did periods disappear from acronyms? I VERY clearly remember being taught in elementary school that acronyms use the first letter from each word, capitalized, and followed by a period. Like N.A.S.A. or A.I. Was I hallucinating all of fourth grade? Surely I didn't start that young.

    When did the nation vote to remove periods? When was this on the nightly news? PDAs CANNOT work by the rules as I know them. Personal Digital Assistants would just be P.D.A. Making it indistinguishable from Personal Digital Assistant, P.D.A. N.A.S.A.s makes no sense. Grammar nazis, what the hell are the rules for capitalizing and pluralizing acronyms?

  219. or better yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Join the peace corps and help rebuild Afghanistan. They're about as technologically backward as you can get and then the nutcases^Wpeople could be doing some good...

  220. And Now... by Squalish · · Score: 1

    Let the Butlerian Jihad commence.

    --
    People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
  221. How Convenient! by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

    There are some pretty big holes in this chart.

    Nothing mentioned between 60 Hz and 27 MHz, so all those quacks on the AM band (535 kHz - 1605 kHz) are still able to talk to their gullible audiences about E-M sensitivity.

    Also conveniently lacking are all your VHF TV channels. That gap between 27 MHz and 400 MHz is more than big enough for all channels between 2 and 13 (54 MHz - 88 MHz for channels 2 through 6, and 174 MHz - 215 MHz for 7 through 13). You may be sensitive to other parts of the spectrum, but at least you can still catch your Must See TV with no risk of odd sexual urges!

    FM radio is also OK (88 MHz to 108 MHz), so NPR is still good for me. Thank heaven for little favors...

    But some of you Dawson's Creek fanatics may be out of luck. The UHF TV channels are mostly harmless (470 MHz - 608 MHz for channels 14 to 36, 614 MHz - 806 MHz for 38 to 69), but as we can see, channel 69 may cause AIDS. Check your local listings!

    New customers of satellite radio should be safe (they tend to sit in the S-band, between 2.31 GHz and 2.36 GHz, just under the frequencies for blisters and warts).

    Unfortunately for Cox, Comcast and other cable companies is the way they get their feeds on the C-band (3.6 GHz to 7.025 GHz) Proof positive that too much late-night Cinemax can make you go blind!

    Even worse for them, their competitors in the digital satellite market are sitting pretty in the ku-band (10.7 GHz - 14.5 GHz). Too energetic for any problems listed here.

    On a slightly more serious note, I'm surprised they didn't mention the serious (proven) health risks of more energetic frequencies, like the severe burns that can be caused by EM waves in the 350 THz - 400 THz range, or the relation between skin cancer and frequencies over 750 THz. Hell, if you have too much of anything between 400 THz and 750 THz, you might go blind!

  222. what's the frequency, kennith? by sludg-o · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know, he'll be kicking Dan Rather's Ass, calling him Kenneth, and demanding to know what frequency the feds are using to control his mind.

    What a nut.

  223. Re:The Time Machine 2: The Eloi Pull An Animal Far by bonzoesc · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to read to the end of Animal Farm before announcing a victor.

  224. The solution is evolution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fry 'em.

  225. and the result... by cornice · · Score: 1

    At first I thought this might work out well. Being one of the only towns to make this rule stick would certainly draw people to that location. Then I thought about it... The town will be consumed with hypochondriacs, will cease to function and require a bailout from the state of California.

  226. This is bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I should stop persuing my computer science degree, and instead get a PhD in Psychology. I could then move to this town where 99% of the population is totally fucked up in the head and make a shit load of money.

    1. Re:This is bullshit by Catamount · · Score: 1

      You don't need to move to Mendocino. If you'll go into psychology, you'll find a lot of interesting research material anywhere in the U. S., especially in the places like MA or CA (Just not to lose time, begin with any activist group standing for prohibiting something). If you have questions about their agenda, please, go to MentalHealth.net and read the "Personality Disorders" section. You'll be delighted. Very soom you'll be able able to use proper names instead of "Left". "Right", "Green", "Concerned Parent" or whatever other aliases these diseases exist under.

  227. He probably calls himself a "progressive" by GCP · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Nobody hates progress more. Welcome to my world: Northern California.

    The voters in places like Mendocino, Berkeley, Santa Cruz, San Francisco, Oakland... tend to consider the scientific method to be part of the "vast right-wing conspiracy". Their politics reflect how far beyond scientific reasoning they've "evolved".

    --
    "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
    1. Re:He probably calls himself a "progressive" by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2
      I've yet to see a proper use of that word. I like the "progressive" tax, where the more progress you make, the more value you provide to society, the harder Uncle Sam shakes you to get the money out of your pockets. Double your salary quintuple your tax.


      I used to think the opposite of progress was Congress, but progressive's pretty near opposite as well.

    2. Re:He probably calls himself a "progressive" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "vast right-wing conspiracy" ???

      Those poor people in Northen California... Here in the mid-west the scientific method is seen as a vast left-wing conspiracy!

      All of that evil reseach is all because of Clinton and Gore. God forbid if the research happens to cure cancer or something. It's all bad, it's playing god...

      Thank god I'm a left winger!! :) lol

  228. whats really crazy.. by Suppafly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This guy is quoted in the article as saying he can't even hold his computer mouse anymore without pain.. whats he think is happening to him? magical ray eminating from the mouse are microwaving his hand.. out of all the computer equipment most people use, surely the mouse is the least dangerous..

    Its like the one guy in the article said.. "you can't argue with zealots"

    It disturbs me that this crazy person can collect disability for the fact that he thinks electronics harm him..

  229. Onion article describes cure for RF sensitivity by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Onion describes new technology that is bound to cure electrical sensitivity. Approved for your use by men in very white coats.

    Why am I tempted to move to Mendocino and start a HAM radio hobby?

    --
    if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}
  230. Sleep ban by spookyfluke · · Score: 1

    I suggest a ban on sleep. Sometimes I have terrible nightmares and they make me feel real bad! I propose everyone get a sleep buddy, that way you can wake eachother up every half hour or so just in case.

    --
    you.bases.each{|base|base.are_belong_to=us}
  231. The Least of Mendocino's Problems by MrResistor · · Score: 2
    Mendocino is a theme park. IIRC buildings can only be painted 3 colors in Mendocino. Almost every building is white, there are a few that are a very pale yellow which is pretty close to white, and I'm not sure what the other color is. This is mentioned briefly on the second page of the article. There are 3 bars, a couple of restaurants, a couple of antique shops, a pretty good coffee place, and a bunch of bed-and-breakfasts.

    That's Mendocino. The whole thing. It's a flyspeck. If you want to buy anything useful, like groceries for example, you go to Fort Bragg, which is about 10 minutes north.

    The real irony, I think, is that a tower placed in Caspar (an even smaller town that sits between Mendocino and Fort Bragg, consisting of a bar with a kitchen, a small hotel, and a small recording studio) would probably serve all the wireless needs of anyone in Mendocino just fine.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:The Least of Mendocino's Problems by soybean · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the Caspar Inn. Mmmmm beeerrrr.

  232. I guess... by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    These people don't like the new verizon ad. "Can you hear me now?"

  233. This is really great to hear, Congrats by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

    Being an amateur radio operator, I fully understand the possible side effects of RF.

    If it weren't for the huge lobbying efforts of the electricity industry, there would be sweeping investigations into the effects of living around especially the high tension lines you see on the huge usually steel towers.

    Congrats to this city, keep it up.

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
  234. Some power line facts by David+Frankenstein · · Score: 1

    Found a nice page with info on power lines and cancer. A choice quote...

    Calculations show that the typical maximum power radiated by a power line would be less than 0.0001 microwatts/cm^2, compared to the 0.2 microwatts/cm^2 that a full moon delivers to the Earth's surface on a clear night.

  235. did this whako forget about satilites? by zentex · · Score: 1

    So, you mean to tell me this guy carries a sheet of lead on his head to stop the constant barrage of RF comming from the thousands of orbiting satilites? ...or did he forget about those? (sensativity thru obscurity? :-)

    Sounds like this guy slings FUD better than a salesman for watchguard :)

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  236. You are what you defeat by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to read to the end of Animal Farm before announcing a victor.

    In fact, I first realized the similarity of my story to Animal Farm after I listened to "the becoming" on NIN's album the downward spiral. To put it another way, "You are what you defeat."

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  237. Neuronally Challenged? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a person to be electrically sensitive, the neurons in that person's brain must be able to register interferences or changes in electrical activities from the surrounding. It is a simple exercise to show that the voltage from a nearby cell phone is not sufficient to break the carbon-carbon covalent bond -- the basis of neuronal activities.

    So, it is not inconceiveable that these electrically sensitive types are actually neuronally challenged -- maybe they are mutants of the human race that are not carbon-based life forms, being doped with krypton or xeon isotopes, for e.g., thus having a lower threshold of the neuronal covalent bond energy.

  238. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Then you calculated wrong. Experiment: go get a 3 or 4 foot florescent tube light bulb, go stand under a high voltage line at night, and point the bulb at the high voltage line. The bulb will light up. I have personally verified that this works.

    In a related anecdote, some guy (IIRC in the UK) was busted for stealing power from the power company. He did this buy winding a large quantity of copper coil around his garage, which was situated underneith a high voltage line. The garage full of coil was sufficient to induce enough power to run his house. Unfortunately, I can't find a link to the story.

    Caveat: I still think the people trying to shut down the school radio are nuts. I just wanted to point out that short-range EM from high voltage lines is a much different situation than EM from cell towers.

    Crispin
    ----
    Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
    Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc.
    Immunix: Security Hardened Linux Distribution
    Available for purchase

  239. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Computer! · · Score: 2

    To play the devil's advocate for a moment...

    I don't think they think it's possible to block out all stray radiation, just like it's not possible to avoid all injury in football. They're just putting on some pads.

    Of course, none of them will be able to read this, so I'm burning karma for nothing. Oh well.

    --
    If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
  240. The sad thing by fleener · · Score: 2

    The sad thing is that people feel wireless and fast Internet access are essential for a good economy. If you take one of the most beautiful places on earth and give it a "healthy economy," that means extreme land development and infrastructure that ruins everything about the place that made people want to live there in the first place. Why is it "unhealthy" to have an economy that is not growing, that merely sustains itself?

    1. Re:The sad thing by slcdb · · Score: 1

      I think what the article should have empahsized more is that inviting quacks to inundate Mendocino is bad for the economy. Not because of the lack of wireless or Internet access, but because of the lack of intelligent citizens.

      --
      Despite what EULAs say, most software is sold, not licensed.
    2. Re:The sad thing by fleener · · Score: 2

      However, let's not confuse the quackery with legitimate opposition to cell towers. They are massive, unsightly structures, often put in the most serene beautiful places. I hope/trust such obvious structures are kept well out of common public view. (It can be a difficult idea to understand if you live in a cement metropolis.)

  241. WTF by llama_flyer · · Score: 1

    People like this need to be ejected into the sun so that they cant breed!!! I mean this sounds like the start of a new cult or something thats anti technology so that these whiney ass commie pricks can sit around and relate these imaginary woes to other nuts like themselves. Maybe we could put them all on an island or in the desert with nothing but essentials and let them live, and then watch them some back to civilization with a new appreciation for radios, and microwaves, and cell phones...etc..etc! People are Stupid!

  242. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by OmegaDan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I agree the guy is, um, strange ... its not the presence of a EM field thats dangerous ... its more like being exposed to changes in flux thats a problem ... Either by moving *your* body through the field, or the field changing somehow, IE alternatic current :)

    You have to recall the universe is all about motion ... the reason the earths field dosen't bother is us, because relative to us it is stationary.

  243. Radio Free Zone already exists in W.Virginia by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 5, Informative

    There already exists a "Radio Free Zone" in the United States that is far more free of stray electromagnetic fields than Mendocino could ever hope to be. It is a very large area around the Greenbank Radio Telescope facility (and some military facilities) in West Virginia called the National Radio Quiet Zone.

    If these kooks really want to be "free" from the EM spectrum then they should stop trying to take over the politics of Mendocino and force the locals to give up their technology so these "sensitives" can all move there. Instead they should just move to the 13,000 square miles of land already covered by the National Radio Quiet Zone. That way the people of Mendocino can enjoy their wireless technology and cell phones and the "sensitives" can live as sheltered an existence as they could ever hope to have.

    http://astrosun.tn.cornell.edu/faculty/haynes/as at /nrqz.html

    1. Re:Radio Free Zone already exists in W.Virginia by Halloween+Jack · · Score: 1

      For that matter, they could move to Alaska; there are valleys there that, possibly, no human being has set foot in, ever. But that, of course, wouldn't be terribly convenient. It reminds me of Halifax, Nova Scotia; you'd think that there would be plenty of places in Canada where you could ban perfume, artificially-generated EM radiation, clothes, or whatever else you want to get rid of, and it'll cause no more inconvenience than a passing joke on late-night talk shows. Problem is, once someone's convinced that it's their God-given right to have their own personal neuroses catered to without inconveniencing them personally, just try to pry them loose of their delusions.

      --
      I looked into the abyss, and the abyss looked into me--and we both winked.
  244. "Wireless-free" by seanmeister · · Score: 1

    .. hmmm, wirelessless?

  245. Acronymity by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Acronyms were originally under strict rules for use. However, as of 1991 (by my best recollection, at least) the Chicago Manual of Style allowed for acronyms to be built with or without periods. Capital letters are still a requirement, and I don't recall seeing any mention allowing apostrophes to pluralize. Anyone have a recent copy of the big orange that can check?

    Virg

    P.S. Since when have changes to accepted editorial style been news? I figure that if the nightly news people cared enough about style changes to report on them, they might consider using editorial style guidelines once in a while as well.

    1. Re:Acronymity by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2
      Anyone have a recent copy of the big orange that can check?

      I have the 1982 edition, which states:

      14.2 It is often an open question whether or not periods should be used with particular abbreviations. The trend is now strongly away from the use of periods with all kinds of abbreviations that have carried them in the past. In our view this is to the good: anything that reduces the fussiness of typography makes for easier reading.

      14.15 Both in run of text (preferably after one spelled-out use) and in tabular matter, notes, etc., the names of government agencies, network broadcasting companies, associations, fraternal and service organizations, unions, and other groups are often abbreviated. Such abbreviations are usually set in full caps with no periods[.]

      However, IIRC, the New York Times is a holdout in this regard and still uses periods in most acronyms. Of course, the Times is stylistically very conservative; I believe it was only a few years ago that the Times stopped spelling government (when referring to the federal government as an entity) with a capital G. I could never decide if that was out of some sort of Teutonic complex or because the Times simply had a predilection for Big Government with a literal Big G ;-)

      --

      "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
  246. static free zone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    copper mesh dome

  247. Why didn't he move to northwest Nebraska? by Grax · · Score: 1

    There is hardly anyone to disturb there. That guy wouldn't have much to worry about from radio/micro waves there.

    Seriously, I think if the people want to have a radio/micro wave free zone they should be able to have it. After all, silicone breast implants were considered safe for many years. (heck, in 35 years it may be determined the cellular phones increase breast size)

    1. Re:Why didn't he move to northwest Nebraska? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, silicone breast implants have not been shown to cause any medical problems in the women who have them. Also, since you don't seem to keep up with this kind of stuff, high voltage lines do not cause cancer.

    2. Re:Why didn't he move to northwest Nebraska? by Capsaicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      FYI, silicone breast implants have not been shown to cause any medical problems in the women who have them. Also, since you don't seem to keep up with this kind of stuff, high voltage lines do not cause cancer.

      To translate for the irony deprived ... Dow Corning have now gone out of the silicon breast business because the expense of paying for their customers health bills and there is a demonstrably higher incidence of childhood leukemeas in children living near high power lines.

      HOWEVER, this does not prove that microwaves are dangerous ... they might only possibly be dangerous.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  248. On a related topic... by Hydro-X · · Score: 2, Funny

    The crusade of the good people of Mendocino, CA has inspired me to make an effort to help aliviate the pain and suffering of myself and many others. I am photosensitive, meaning my eyes burn if I don't wear sunglasses or tinted lenses outdoors on a sunny day. I am told that many other people, even a few of my friends, are also affected by this horrible affliction. This is why I am taking advantage of this thread to announce my plans to invade a small town with photosensitive people (Lorne NB looks promising right now) and block out the sun and all other forms of light.

  249. VOICE&DATA Transmission without a sending devi by _shanti_ · · Score: 1

    Raum-Energie-Forschung.de has a amazing article about an experiment implementing global-scaling-technology into voice/data-transmission-technics .. the idea is to modulate standing gravity-waves with voice-signature. There has been a successful demo of this technology in germany, where scientists established a "realtime" voice connection over 2500km distance without a sender. This would bring the benefits of a non-polluting (esmog) wave-communicating-system! An article about the experiment can be found here .
    .. Global-Scaling is deep math-science with a rather wide spectrum of possible application on health, biology, tech, ..) .. the only bad thing about this article: it written in german and its a PDF.

  250. Stealing power for the chicken coop... by RasTafarii · · Score: 1

    farmers for years have laid out long loops of wire under hv powerlines which couple inductively and provide enough current to run the lights in the chicken coop or barn.

    but they can be charged for theft of service when the power company inspects the right of way periodically and finds the wire loop...

    and what about those 2 dishnetwork satellites sitting at long. 110w and 119w bathing the entire northern hemisphere with 500 channels and not a damn thing to watch on tv...?

    --

    "...can you imagine a BEOWULF CLUSTER of these? That'd be some serious power!"

    1. Re:Stealing power for the chicken coop... by WNight · · Score: 2

      IMHO this is stupid. If the power radiates through my property, I should be able to use it. Much the same as the descrambler issue (pre DMCA) of having the right to view anything someone broadcast to you, regardless of their desires.

      Does this use of inductive coils somehow reduce the available power at the other end of the wire, or is it just using "waste" energy and not affecting anything?

    2. Re:Stealing power for the chicken coop... by Accelerated+Joe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does this use of inductive coils somehow reduce the available power at the other end of the wire, or is it just using "waste" energy and not affecting anything?

      The inductive coils certainly will deplete the power from the power lines. In fact, those high voltage power lines are not even attached to anything directly at the near end, but run through a transformer, which uses two coils of wire to induce a lower voltage after the transformer.

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
  251. cause and effect by rossarian · · Score: 1

    I have some sympathy for people like this. Not the patronizing, smug kind, but the real kind. The reason is, I myself could be diagnosed as 'electrically sensitive'. It has nothing to do with EM fields permeating the air and giving me skin rashes. What it has to do with is noise. My computer's hard drives spinning away, fans whining and whirring away, the monitor emitting a high-pitched tone just on the edge of my hearing, the TV doing the same thing, the simple hum of the electricity through the walls, and on and on. Ever been hit with a sense of relief when the power goes out and all those noises that you don't hear consciously are quiet? Me too.

    It's the NOISE, caused by electrical devices. It's measurable, annoying, and after a while it wears on you, like somebody rubbing you with sandpaper all day.

  252. Gene Ray by pa-guy · · Score: 1

    and this guy could be brothers.Gene Ray's harmonic Timecube

  253. Where does the sensitivity come from? by pclminion · · Score: 2
    I have a theory, which explains why people can be fine for years, and then suddenly become "sensitized."

    Maybe certain frequencies cause chemical changes in these people's bodies, who knows how -- a broken bond, an inactive gene that becomes active, a protein is somehow modified, whatever. Over time, these people develop allergic sensitivities to these mutated biochemicals (the same way a worker in a perfume factory might develop a sensitivity over the years).

    Then, whenever they are exposed to the right frequency radiation, and these chemicals start to get produced, they have an allergic reaction.

    Could it be possible? I'm not a chemist, so could somebody comment on it?

  254. Re:even Lud would be embarrassed by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course. Since you're probably really "Italian" (like Chico Marx or Howard Stern) , here's a tip for whenever people can't see you using your *hands* to illustrate what you are saying; use punctuation!!! It's the only way we _know_ what you are emphasizing!!!

  255. home wireless-free zone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For many years I have seriously contemplated a radio-free bedroom. I don't need to keep my cellphone in my bedroom, nor do I need any other radio device. Since I spend eight to ten hours a night in it, I think it would be nice to be surrounded by a faraday cage. When I think of the amount of jumbled up spectrum that irradiates me every day, I'd just sleep better at night knowing I was radio free.

    Really I sympathize with the kooks who coat their walls in foil to block the radio waves. I personally will use copper mesh under plaster. :-) (don't need too many people knowing I am a little strange)

  256. follow the money by chongo · · Score: 1
    Firstenberg, the author of Microwaving Our Planet, a book that blames ...

    Firstenberg refused to disclose his diagnosis, which allows him to collect disability income.

    A book deal? Disability income? Enough said ...

    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
  257. Re:even Lud would be embarrassed by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So what if his name were Smith? Would he just be another crazy WASP...? Probably not!

    No, if he were just a crazy WASP his name would be McVeigh or Weaver or Koresh etc. Quit picking on Smith! =)

  258. Re:did you read this crap? My MOUSE BURNS!!!!! by moreati · · Score: 1

    No a mouse is not just a diode or two. Almost all will have some form of microchip (possibly just a serial encoder, probably more) in there. Many older mice are dual mode, so they'll function connnected to the serial port, or the ps2 port. Modern USB mice _will_ contain a microprocessor, which means an oscilator (sp?) running at a few MHz.

    I'm not claiming that these people actually experience actual symptoms, but the facts you mention are inaccurate. It would be proper to remain open to the possibility, the human body is a n amzingly complex machine, which probably still contains many surprises. Until properly conducted experiments show conclusive evidence, don't jump the gun.

    On the subject of whether the ban is proper, I would have to say no. A faraday cage would probably be a better solution of the sufferers. Even if it's only as a placebo.

    Alex

  259. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Talkischeap · · Score: 1

    >> Has anyone told these folks that they are constantly bathed in microwave radiation from the Big Bang?

    Haven't you figured out that we EVOLVED with that background radiation, but we DIDN'T with "human made" electromagnatic fields?

    Apparently, you can't make the jump in logic to see that there could quite possibly be a REAL health issue here, pity that so many people are so CLOSED MINDED and "Knee Jerk Reactionary" to issues that they are unfamilier with.

    >> They should move to another universe, provided they aren't already living in one...

    I'll bet your forefathers were there telling Columbus that he'd sail off the edge of the earth too!

    --
    If it don't GO... chrome it. ~ Frank Banks
  260. Firstenburg is doubly blind by MadAhab · · Score: 2

    Funny that you mention double-blind tests. According to the article, Firstenburg rambles around with a carload of equipment to detect the things that are causing him such pain and discomfort. You'd think he wouldn't need elaborate sensors to detect that he has a headache. You don't see people with carpal tunnel problems checking levels taped to their forearms before deciding their wrists hurt.

    --
    Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  261. Chemical sensitivty..? by vmxeo · · Score: 1

    ...There's more evidence of harm coming from pesticides used on crops, yet I don't see them shutting down any of the wineries in the area.

    But what's the worse that could happen? So you can't use your cell phone. You'll just have to go to the nearby town of Boonville and use the buckwaller in front of the Horn of Zeese Don't forget to bring quarters.

  262. Radio waves from lightning by ttyRazor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to see how these people react in a thunderstorm. If they're really as bothered by radio waves as they say, their heads should explode. More likely they don't even react.

    1. Re:Radio waves from lightning by Capsaicin · · Score: 1
      I'd like to see how these people react in a thunderstorm.

      In fact people living with EMF sensitivity, have to get into the shower and stand under it at full blast until the thunderstorm passes.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  263. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Talkischeap · · Score: 1

    >>I remember in physics class in high school, we figured out the strength of the EM field around a high voltage wire. We calculated that even as close at 50 feet (like wires suspended in the air), the earth's natural field was like 100 times stronger.

    So just what does that prove? You have ONE data point in an issue that you know nothing else about, and yet you fool yourself in to thinking that you know it all, and judge others based on ONE data point?.

    Humans DIDN'T evolve with all the additional EMF's that "modern" society seems to be "addicted" to. Yet, you have ONE data point, and you know it all?

    Next time you laugh at those "poor crazy EMF people", you best be looking in the mirror, because YOU are the joke.

    >>Since then, I've always viewed these claims of EM radiation problems with a skeptical eye.

    Uh... it appears that you are deluding yourself about being "skeptical", based on your closing statement.

    >>My own suspicions is that this guy had a few too many REMs to the skull from his dental X-Rays and is a candidate for therapy. :-D

    Oh, and here you go, totally contradicting yourself. Or are only dental X-Rays bad for us, and NOT all of the other EMF's in our environment?

    --
    If it don't GO... chrome it. ~ Frank Banks
  264. INFRASOUND is a Real Threat as Opposed To EMFs. by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 2

    Infrasound, sounds below the normal range of human hearing, present a small, but real threat many people. Infrasound can greatly effect one's mood and health.

    Low frequency sounds can travel thousands of miles and is used for military communications. In some areas, such infrasounds can be EXTREMELY LOUD...some sources of very intense infrasound include manufacturing, some vehicles, long-range military transmission equipment, and of course various natural sources including thunderstorms, earthquakes and volcanoes - and according to current theory, infrasound partly explains the bizarre behavior of some animals before an earthquake, etc.

    EMFs are everywhere and if the people in the article really are sensitive to them, then how can they have electricity in their house or use the telephone?? Electrical systems produce a large amount of EMFs and thus I would assume these folks would all live in candle-lit houses or at minimum live in houses with highly shielded electrical systems costing tens of thousands...but instead it appears they live in ordinary homes.

    Anyways, in my view, these folks ought to worry more about infrasound than EMFs.

  265. Re: should I bring all my shoes and glasses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, another hypochondriac Jew from New York trying to change the world. This guy is a nut, and if he was broke, he'd be another toothless guy wandering around with his aluminum foil hat rambling about the Computer God's Worldwide Overall Plan and brainwash antenna loops. This guy needs psychological help, not medical.

    Oh and if you're really curious, check out a guy who started the whole paranoid-schizophrenic luddite thing: Francis E. Dec, Esq. A good read even if you're not interested in Feinberg or whatever the hell his name is.

  266. I'm doomed. by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 1
    I'm sitting in front of a 17" monitor, with a CD player going and the BBC World Service on shortwave, getting ready for work. I'm wearing a pager, a cellphone, a wireless microphone for my car's dash-camera, and an 800MHz transceiver.

    With all of that RF floating around the den, I'm going to die. I'll probably have a stroke before I finish this and click "submit."

    Goodbye, cruel microwaved worl...NO CARRIER

  267. Re:even Lud would be embarrassed by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be a lot more impressed if you step up to defend Jerry Falwell the next time he is mocked on Slashdot. (Not that he doesn't deserve it)

  268. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by mizhi · · Score: 1

    I believe that you need to calm down. I was pointing out some relatively minor calculations, not one datapoint, we had done in physics that seemed to cast some doubt on the claims of these individuals, which do seem to be a bit odd. So, yes, I am quite a bit skeptical and I remain so despite your frothing at the mouth reply. I also did not claim to know it all. There have been several replies quite rightly pointing out some pertinent facts that I had not considered such as the change in the flux.

    "Oh, and here you go, totally contradicting yourself. Or are only dental X-Rays bad for us, and NOT all of the other EMF's in our environment?"

    That comment wasn't meant to be taken seriously... well at least not totally. Perhaps he has a mental disorder; I am being serious about that. As far as I can see, no one has seriously questioned this man's mental health, he has simply gone around and gotten signatures based on his beliefs on a subject for which his credentials are dubious at best. As for X-Rays etc... they're close range. The intensity of an EMF decreases quite rapidly the further away from the source.

    --
    Humorless sig goes here.
  269. How about an exchange? by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

    We in Australia will take your California flakes and let them have a bit of outback all their own -- but you get our legislators.

    Deal?

  270. Let me show them pain.... by t_allardyce · · Score: 2

    Let me go to that town, i will bring a microwave, and strap someones head in it... then we'll see if emf is dangerous to health...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  271. Broadcast power - that trick never works by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
    Microwaves are intentional radiation and are used to TRANSMIT power
    Well over a hundred years back Tesla tried broadcast power, showed that it was very ineffient, and moved on to other things. That is why we use AC over wires.

    I see this whole thing as about science getting a bad reputation (often due to misinformation eg. "smoking won't kill you", or drastic and incorrect simplification by elements of the media), and being opposed at every turn by the superstitious.

    I would not live under an 11kV power line, but wouln't mind living fifty metres away, because I know that the intensity of the electric field drops away rapidly with distance. Some people would object to it being within sight. A lot of people fall into the trap of sorting things into "bad" and "good", without remembering that something as simple as fire can be both, depending on where it is.

    1. Re:Broadcast power - that trick never works by dnoyeb · · Score: 0

      Thats not what I said. I said they are "capable" of being used to transmit power. Those are not my exact words but I though I used the proper english to express that idea. Sure electromagnetic fields drop off with the "square" of the distance. But so what. There is 1 simple point. They have said with scientific certainty that electromagnetic waves are harmless. That is a complete lie. Else nobody would wear lead jackets when they perform x-rays. Microwave ovens would not cook food. the Sun would not cause cancer. This means waves have the "capability" of causing harm. They are claiming that they do not. I think they do. I am not overly sensitive. But I take it just like smoking. SInce I dont smoke, I dont want to breathe yoru smoke. Thats my right. So since I dont have a cell phone, why should your cell phone be transmitting through my head. Why should your power lines run past and irridiate my house? etc. That choice should be made on as much an individual basis as possible.

    2. Re:Broadcast power - that trick never works by Mandelbrute · · Score: 1
      Thats not what I said. I said they are "capable" of being used to transmit power. Those are not my exact words
      Whoever wrote it was wrong - there's more than just the two of us on slashdot!
      They have said with scientific certainty that electromagnetic waves are harmless
      Whoever "they" are is also wrong - just ask any physicist.
      Why should your power lines run past and irridiate my house?
      It is a matter of intensity. Some people would complain if the things are within sight. Some people even complain about that windmills are "visual pollution" - I put the strange person that is complaining to his state government about low intensity electromagnetic radiation in that catagory. Why should the mouse, carrying 5V DC burn his hand when turning on a 110V AC light switch doesn't? He's surrounded by 110V wires in his house. An electromagnetic field fluctuating at 60Hz can penetrate through a couple of centimetres of steel (that's how an induction furnace works), although an Australian judge in a bad moment ruled that it cannot penetrate human skin - so why does the low intensity electromagnetic radiation that he thinks about affect him while the other stuff doesn't?
  272. 'electrically sensitive' people by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

    Think of it as evolution in action.

    --
    Display some adaptability.
  273. Right, but wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All RF with wavelengths less than about one-tenth the gap of the chicken wire...

    Should read:

    All RF with wavelengths greater than 10 times
    the gap of the chicken wire


    Certainly 60hz would be blocked but microwaves wouldn't be....

  274. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by WNight · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not just the strength of the field that matters (directly), it's the delta in field strength between the ends of the bulb.

    At the same field strength, the larger source is further away and the field delta is lower.

    Thus, the Earth's EM field could be vastly stronger, but still not cause a bulb to glow as brightly as a power line. (Unless the bulb stretched from here to the moon...)

    However, the human body is likely affected in somewhat the same way as a bulb, so it's not totally silly to think that EM from a power line might cause some weird effects.

    The people advocating this would get a lot farther if they didn't seem to be crystal-healing, acupuncture using, ginko-biloba eating freaks without a clue about the scientific method (or any discoveries since the 1920s for that matter.) But try to bring up double-blind studies with them and you'll get a rant about the ego of western science, etc, etc...

  275. Quick question for you: by Kymermosst · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since you claim to be a Ph.D...

    If the Earth's magnetic field alternated its polarity 60 times a second, do you think ALL of the flourescent lighting in the world would glow?

    From what I understand, from an article in Discover magazine years back (I know... biased and questionable... but...) which discussed magnetic fields around high-voltage power lines, and also electric blankets, the chief problem is the frequency of the field in question. The article states that the danger from a D.C. current is negligable no matter the voltage, but that 60 (and 50) hz A.C. can cause damage, in theory.

    Me personally, I like electricity. A.C., D.C.... doesn't matter, just as long as my gadgets run.

    Oh, and as far as I am concerned, it's not theft of service to tap inductively into high voltage lines that run over your property... It should be considered payment for the risk of cancer that some people think is there.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:Quick question for you: by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 2
      claim to be a Ph.D
      "claim"?! How hard can it be to look up someone named "crispin"? :-) However, my Ph.D is in computer science, not EE, so I'm just as much of a diletante as the usual slashdotter on this topic. I just happen to be a big enough geek to have gone out to a power line with a florescent tube once upon a time :-)

      If the Earth's magnetic field alternated its polarity 60 times a second, do you think ALL of the flourescent lighting in the world would glow?
      Yes, they would. That's because a static magnetic field does not convey any energy, and an alternating field does. You can only induce power from moving EM fields.

      It's an inference from there to the assumption that static magnetic fields are harmless while various alternating EM fields may cause damage. I'm pretty comfortable with the idea that the Earth's magnetic field is harmless to us :-)

      I'm somewhat more on the fence about whether EM radiation causes health hazards. It seems plausible that any field with lots of energy (such as lighting up a florescent tube, or microwaves that melt chocolate) stand a stronger chance of being dangerous than weak fields (such as cell phone or radio towers).

      Note that there have been cases in the past where something was thought to be safe and turned out to be very dangerous. In the 1950's, shoe stores had these X-ray devices for checking out your shoe fit. Put your feet over the emitter, put your face above the view plate, and lookit your tooties in the shoes. Small problem: loads of X-ray rems hitting you in the face :-)

      Crispin
      ----
      Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
      Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc.
      Immunix: Security Hardened Linux Distribution
      Available for purchase

    2. Re:Quick question for you: by Eil · · Score: 2

      The article states that the danger from a D.C. current is negligable no matter the voltage, but that 60 (and 50) hz A.C. can cause damage, in theory.

      HAH. You go ahead and grab that 15,000 volt inside your computer monitor while holding onto ground and then I'll gladly listen to your new definition of "negligable." Better yet, get struck by lightning; that's DC as well.

      It's true that DC current isn't as harmful as AC, but crank up the potential and either one will zap you just fine.

      In the aircraft maintenance biz, we work with many different types of power including 28VDC, 115VAC @ 50Hz, and 115VAC @ 400Hz. We have a saying that goes, "60 Hertz but 400 really Hertz!"

    3. Re:Quick question for you: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try 29,500 volts on that picture tube anode.

    4. Re:Quick question for you: by Eil · · Score: 2


      Well, I suppose it depends on the tube. I just chose that value because that's what they use on the 9" monitors that I repair at work...

      The voltmeter probes make quite a spark when nearing up to the terminal on that guy.

    5. Re:Quick question for you: by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      One minor problem... we were talking about induction, not direct contact.

      Of course direct contact would do some damage :)

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    6. Re:Quick question for you: by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      Hey, you know, I've seen one of those X-ray machines in an antique store... pretty cool.

      I was curious about the Earth's magnetic field, because I am not sure how much energy is there... So that answers my question, thanks. I am working on a CS degree, and so don't know much outside of that.

      Now... if there were a way we could cause it to alternate... bingo... free power for a good long time!

      --Mike

      P.S. I wasn't quite sure Crispin was a real name or not.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    7. Re:Quick question for you: by Eil · · Score: 2


      That much is true... I can't remember what the original post said (too lazy to look it up) but I'm pretty sure I was on-topic!

      That being said, I do remember that one of the hazards quoted by the luddite was electric shock.

  276. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by izzylobo · · Score: 1

    This is IMPORTANT INFORMATION which should be DISSEMINATED WIDELY for the GOOD OF ALL MANKIND!

    Detecting psychoceramics 101; the more ALL CAPITALS they use, the more likely it is that they are nutbars.

    --
    We are in a desperate race between Stupidity and Transcendance; Don't pick the wrong side.
  277. I lived there by Krellan · · Score: 1

    I lived and grew up there, and went to high school in Mendocino. (Hi Bob and Dylan!)

    It's true that the village has successfully kept cellphone towers out. (It's not a town, as it's not incorporated.) The whole area is one big dead zone. Much of the entire county is strictly analog, anyway -- it seems to have been passed by when digital service was brought to other areas. Instead of talking on a cellphone, there are other fine activities to do in Mendocino County.

    It's a small area dependent on tourism. One of the major draws is that it is a place to get away from all the hustle and bustle of larger cities. The Historical (some say Hysterical) Review Board strictly enforces the cellphone ban and other ordinances that seem silly, such as not allowing any remodeling that changes the look of the village! It is a unique area very popular with artists and hippies, and has a completely different culture than what most Slashdotters are used to.

    But the electronics lab and computer lab in the high school kicks ass :-)

    1. Re:I lived there by foolish+youngster · · Score: 1

      As a former resident of Willits, California, I can honestly say the town of Mendocino is unique in many ways. Not the least of which is a near total rejection of anything created after 1950. It would be a nice place to retire to, but it is a small town and has all the foibles that go with that. Wireless free zone? I am not the least surprised....

      --
      -- Defenestrate Microsoft!
  278. Playing devil's advocate by pyramid+termite · · Score: 2

    Alright, these people in Medocino are plainly deluded - but a claim there's never been any hard evidence that low intensity radio waves harm anyone skips an important issue - how could there be? We've been saturated in them for the last 50 or so years and by the time anyone thought of asking what the long term effects of this might be it was too late - you can't have a study like this without a control group and no control group is possible. And putting people in a radio free room and seeing if they can predict bursts of energy aimed at them only proves that people can't decect bursts of energy aimed at them. It does nothing to prove or disprove what the long term psychological or physical effects may or may not be.

    Let's look at some other things that have happened for the last 100 years. There are increased rates of depression, autism, schizophrenia, cancer and birth defects. The population of songbirds and amphibians has decreased remarkably. Violence has increased and so has fear. Is all of that due to radio waves? I really doubt it - one can find a lot of alternate explanations. Could some of it be due to the increase in radio waves?

    How could we possibly know? There are too many variables between the world of 100 years ago and now to say. If there is any place where one can find a group of people to study who've lived a modern lifestyle and avoided radio wave effects, (if any), I don't know about it. In short, this may be an issue that we are incapable of understanding scientifically with the tools we currently have. But just because we don't understand it doesn't mean it can't exist or can't affect us.

    Where does that leave us? Pretty much in the dark on this issue. We can prove or disprove effects of higher levels of this radiation, but the long term effects of lower levels are unknown. Forget about the people with their tinfoil hats in Medocino; there are valid reasons to investigate this issue, if we can find a way to do so. Scoffing at the people with extreme opinions is not going to resolve the question. And part of having an a scientific mindset is recognizing a good question when one sees one, not just attributing the issue to hysteria or paranoia.

    For the record, I don't believe I have any conditions caused by radio wave exposure, and don't have an informed opinion on what the effects of long term radiation might be. Neither, as far as I know, does anyone else. Neither the proposition "radio waves are doing things to us" or "radio waves aren't doing thing to us" are provable. A true skeptic has to treat both as dubious statements. I'm a little disappointed that no one replying to this article has taken this point of view.

  279. Here's what the FTC says.... by cielito · · Score: 1

    http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,49842, 00.html

    1. Re:Here's what the FTC says.... by connorbd · · Score: 2

      This article more or less supports my point, actually. Not very strongly, but it leans heavily in that direction.

      /Brian

  280. Is Mendecino miles underground? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

    ...That's the only place these kooks are going to get any relief. Oh wait, the earth itself generates a magnetic field. Maybe these folks are the secret grandchildren of Molemen, surfacing once to take a bride with a human woman, impregnate her, then descend into the caves again.

    Well, it's possible. If one completely insane guy can convince a town to cut off radio communications, anything is possible.

  281. Natural selection will work it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For transmission to be powerful enough to work, it has to be powerful enough to effect. We (scientists) _know_ we don't know what the effects are. Clearly the effects are below a certain threshold for the majority of the population, but populations tend towards normal distributions. This means that some (many) people are going to be adversly effected, perhaps to the point of being genetically selected against. If we over regulate, does it then become "unnatural selection?"

  282. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Talkischeap · · Score: 1

    >>I believe that you need to calm down.

    OK (Big toke of Mendo's finest.), I'll agree... sorry I took it so personal (But it IS.).

    >>I was pointing out some relatively minor calculations, not one datapoint, we had done in physics that seemed to cast some doubt on the claims of these individuals, which do seem to be a bit odd.

    That's hardly definitive, and certainly not enough information for a layman to go around questioning anyone's mental state.

    >>So, yes, I am quite a bit skeptical and I remain so despite your frothing at the mouth reply.

    Yes, I was wrong to attack you, I apoligize.

    >>I also did not claim to know it all. There have been several replies quite rightly pointing out some pertinent facts that I had not considered such as the change in the flux.

    OK, but you still seem closed minded to the ** possibility ** that someone CAN be electrically sensitive, and not be "mentally unstable".

    >

    >>That comment wasn't meant to be taken seriously... well at least not totally.

    Oh, I see, that explains everything.

    >>Perhaps he has a mental disorder; I am being serious about that. As far as I can see, no one has seriously questioned this man's mental health,

    I don't know where you live, but in every town that I've ever lived in, almost everyone knows who the so-called "crazies" are, and this guy isn't one of them. Yes, I live just up the road from Mendocino, or as I prefer to call it, Spendocino. I'm also not in any way associated with this guy though, because I feel it's a losing battle.

    And seriously, have you noticed how you deal with ideas that seem "odd" to you? You question the proponent's state of mental health, before you question that your beliefs could be mistaken, or incomplete. That seems really odd to me.

    >>he has simply gone around and gotten signatures based on his beliefs on a subject for which his credentials are dubious at best.

    You say: "his credentials are dubious at best." Really? The man has written a book, how many books have you written? I'm much more likely to believe someone who has gone to all the trouble to research and write a book about something, than someone who hasn't.

    >>As for X-Rays etc... they're close range. The intensity of an EMF decreases quite rapidly the further away from the source.

    Again, you miss the big picture. You are working within a closed framework of ideas, accepting those ideas that seem to fit, and discarding those that don't. Even though, they may be completely valid ideas, even if they don't fit into your existing body of knowledge.

    And thanks for not flaming me back, I owe you one.

    --
    If it don't GO... chrome it. ~ Frank Banks
  283. Re:How about a Nigger Free Zone? by cielito · · Score: 1

    you are an ASSHOLE - why don't you move to Afghanistan?

  284. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Talkischeap · · Score: 1

    Oh no, actually, ANGRY and FRUSTRATED is more like it.

    But I know you just said that to distract everyone from your own psychosis.

    --
    If it don't GO... chrome it. ~ Frank Banks
  285. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The people advocating this would get a lot farther if they didn't seem to be crystal-healing, acupuncture using, ginko-biloba eating freaks without a clue about the scientific method (or any discoveries since the 1920s for that matter.)

    The guy's a math major with a minor in physics ...

  286. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    its not the presence of a EM field thats dangerous ... its more like being exposed to changes in flux thats a problem ... Either by moving *your* body through the field, or the field changing somehow

    Yeah, so these guys really don't have to have a town or their own ... they should just keep really really still.

  287. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I believe that you need to calm down.

    I believe you are a wanker, with no idea of physics other than the disinformation you managed to pick up at high school

  288. NOT GENETIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is generally thought that peanut allergy is not genetic... & instead caused by parents feeding their children peanut butter before the child's immune system has developed.

    Of course you could argue genes are what caused the parent to feed PB to a toddler, but for all you know the kid could be adopted, and be genetically free of the adoptive parents' taint!

  289. Re:Dehydration? Dangers of dihydrogen monoxide! by Reziac · · Score: 3, Informative

    What you entirely neglect to consider are the dangers inherent to your proposed therapy. Why, millions of people may have already died from dihydrogen monoxide poisoning!!

    More information can be found at http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  290. Heaven Forbid that someone thinks... by dan_the_heretic · · Score: 1

    It seems that someone who says that the world is better off not having 24/7 access to the internet/phone system is as crazy as someone saying that OSX and Apple is a viable alternative to WinTel?!?

    --
    I don't like big words..., does that make me anti-semantic?
  291. Re:Faraday cages -- old sheet plaster works too! by Reziac · · Score: 2

    My house was built in 1956, with that newfangled prefab sheet plaster -- its backing is 0.5" gauge expanded metal mesh, grounded willy-nilly where it touches the electrical outlet boxes (since they use the metal outlet box, not a 3rd wire, as their ground point). Most radios, and my newer TV, get absolutely ZERO reception indoors.

    (An old hi-fi radio and an old TV both have decent reception in here. Must be some defect in my chicken wire. :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  292. Some differences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arguing that "EMR occurs naturally, so induced EMR is OK" is somewhat sophomoric. Natural EMR is considered "noise" in the design of a transmission system, and it is something that that has to be substantially overcome for the system to be successful. Transmission typically consists of a sustained carrier wave that is modulated in some way. For instance, the American Mobile Phone Standard uses frequency modulation over a 30 khz bandwidth, with about 1,000 bands per cell. A signal to noise ratio of greater than 15 db is needed to actually hear anything useful. What this means practically is that when measuring the sum of the natural noise, the man made noise, and the transmission signal, the signal has to be about 32 times more powerful to be useful -- at the receiver end, with an inverse square falloff. There are differences besides power. For instance, any radiation received from cosmic sources, including the sun, will be coherent, whereas most induced radiation will disperse radially. Also, the sun sets. Qualitatively, it may be the difference between listening to the wind blow and listening to roadwork. If we could "hear" it, that is.

    The human body is full of dipoles. We know that in general we are extremely sensitive to EMR; the only other ways we interact with the universe are through direct pressure and chemical sampling. But we cannot listen to the radio without having one. There may be some effect, cumulative over time perhaps, that causes slight neurophysical problems... the fact is we do not yet know. My own experience is that there is a quality to the silence in South Point on the Big Island that surpasses that on the Pacific Crest. But I cannot prove it -- it's just my imagination being affected by all this EMI.

  293. Don't dismiss? You're talking to morons here! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2
    Just run a story on Free Energy or the Harmfulness of EM on Slashdot to see 600+ posters come out with their denial horns blaring. You can tell just how important a secret is by how loudly people are programmed to auto-react.

    People on Slashdot are victims.

    You were modded down to 'troll' for giving your honest opinion in a free debate zone. It's more than just a bad mod; it's the result of culture-wide thought conditioning. (I'd call it mind-control, but too many idiots here would assume that I meant short term, electrode in the neck bullshit. Mind control happens over the long term.)

    The fact is, Slashdotters are part of the geek-elite: tech-geeks are prime targets because even though they are only pawns they remain in many ways the engineers and keepers of today's accepted reality. We make the machines go; and the nature of the machines determines our level of enslavement.

    As such, you can always count on the brain-mush factor in people. Slashdot is living proof. Tell them it's not 'cool' to believe in Cold Fusion, or what have you, and the low-egos around here will drop the idea like a hot rock in order to jump back into the safety of popular concensus and the modified truths sold to them since birth. --Why do you think we were fed so much 'science' learning channel crap when we were kids? --I'll tell you why: It's because kids are easy to program. Most of the people here will argue till they're blue in the face to defend their childhood conditioning, which makes them no better than kids brought up in hard-core Christian communities. They insist that they choose through free will, but the truth is they've been brainwashed since birth.


    -Fantastic Lad

  294. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    You say: "his credentials are dubious at best." Really? The man has written a book, how many books have you written? I'm much more likely to believe someone who has gone to all the trouble to research and write a book about something, than someone who hasn't.

    David Icke has had several books published, but this doesn't disguise the fact that he is still a barking mad loon!

    Or do you believe him too?

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  295. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by mizhi · · Score: 1

    Well, flaming doesn't get anywhere (ie; the AC who called me a wanker). I'm not completely close minded to the possibilities that some people might be more sensitive to EMF than others... there is a fair amount of evidence, although not conclusive, that say, using a Cell phone and what not can increase chances for brain tumors (this is just an example). So, it is safe to say that EMF can and does alter certain aspects of living tissue. Drawing this further, it is possible that some people may have some sort of sensitivity to this. Now, as to questioning this man's mental health, I still believe it's not an altogether bad thing. He is going around and essentially forcing people in this town to go without cell phones, a radio antenna, etc... yeah, they're lucky to have a house over their head and food to eat compared with a large part of the world. More to the point, there _are_ cases, much more documented about people being crazy and imagining all sorts of nasty things happening to them... much more than sensitivity to EMF. Now, if I were in charge, and I'm not, but hypothetically speaking, I would have a three-pronged approach, 1) verify his sanity, 2) conduct tests with him. He should at least be willing to assent to some blind tests in order to justify these claims. If he is truly physically sensitive to EMF, then that's easily tested. 3) Look into other similar claims and see what experts say. Am I being logical in this?

    Note: Mental disorders don't have to mean 'some crazies' as you put it. I take medication myself for depression and I'm somewhat normal other than I read /. and argue about EMF sensitivity when I should be doing other work. Point is, I don't walk around yelling and streetlights. :-)

    Now, as to my own credentials, no, I am not a physics major. I did have a lot of interest in the subject, but did not pursue it in college. My knowledge is rusty, but that one thing (among others) we talked about in my class stood out. Is it definitive, nope. Course not. Other people have pointed out the changing flux and other phenomena I hadn't thought of. I do actually have a few publications. Not books, mind you. Yet. They aren't publications in this particular area; they have to deal with databases, solid modeling, and graph theoretical indexes and are in well-refereed research pubs. I'm not bragging, but I am putting this out so that you are clear that I'm not some rube. Although, sometimes I go off half-cocked and wind up eating a bit of crow. :-)

    The basic thing is, I have a big problem with people who go around and make life difficult for other people with dubious reasons. I favor a more pragmatic approach rather than automatic acquiesence to an individual's, as of now, dubious claims.

    --
    Humorless sig goes here.
  296. Isn't it strange.. by joonasl · · Score: 1
    The symptoms people claiming to be electrically sensitive have are strangely almost identical to those people claimed to get from "Earth Radiation" ten years ago, and underground water channels twenty years ago and so on..

    Makes you wonder..

    --
    "There is a terrorist behind every bush"
  297. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    build a large faraday cage around the entire US. I bet it would be like y2k all over again. (seriously though. could you put a drain on the RF output of a satellite from earth as to reduce it's transmitting power? Hrm.... muhahahha)

  298. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by 3,7,A · · Score: 1

    the important difference is that earth's magnetic field is static, while the one generated by high voltage lines is not. 50-60 Hz might not seem like much, but it creates extemely weak electrical fields anyway (smth to the tune of curl E = -1/c dH/dt ) and those induce currents in your skin. earth's magnetic field never does that, plus we had some time (10^9 years) to adapt to it, while AC fields are very new (10^2 years) and long term effects are largely unknown. in my personal experience, having lived once very close to high voltage lines for a month or so, they are certainly quite uncomforatble. if not for em emissions, they certainly produce a lot of mechanical vibration and noise. cell phones are much worse than any of that. i did some experiments and the net result is that talking on a cell phone is like having your ear hard pressed against the closed door of the working microwave oven. yeah, it's probably nothing but look at that chicken inside

  299. UNIX - because I got high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was gonna maintain accounts, but then I got high
    I was lying on the couch after I got high,
    Now my users can't login, and I know why...
    because I got high, 'cause I got high
    'cause I got high.

    I was gonna upgrade Veritas, but then I got high
    The disk groups didn't import, cause I was high.
    Now I'm calling support and I know why...
    because I got high, 'cause I got high
    'cause I got high.

    I was gonna restore from tape, but then I got high
    I started playing Ape Escape, cause I was high.
    Now, the users are moaning and I know why...
    'cause I got high, 'cause I got high,
    'cause I got high.

    I was gonna rebuild my Kernel, 'cause I was high
    I was gonna convert to a filesystem that journalled, cause I was high.
    Now I'm reinstalling from CD, and I know why...
    'cause I got high, 'cause I got high,
    'cause I got high.

    I was gonna clean up the disk, 'cause I was high
    I was gonna delete every unneeded file, 'cause I was high.
    I deleted /usr/lib, and I know why...
    'cause I was high, 'cause I was high,
    'cause I was high

    I was gonna edit cron on 100 machines, 'cause I was high.
    I was gonna do it from the trusted host, when I was high.
    Now I broke cron on 100 machines, and I know why...
    'cause I was high, 'cause I was high,
    'cause I was high.

    I was gonna work on service tickets, but I was high.
    I started surfing slashdot and fark cause I was high.
    Now my shift's almost over and I know why...
    'cause I got high, 'cause I got high,
    'cause I got high

    I was gonna complie e2fsutils, cause I was high
    I was gonna do it earlier that day, before I was high
    Now I've got a core-dumping fsck, and I know why...
    'cause I was high, 'cause I was high,
    'cause I was high

    I was gonna build a server, 'cause I was high
    I was gonna put windows on it ...

    .... nah, I wasn't that high.

    1. Re:UNIX - because I got high by QuietRiot · · Score: 2

      Standing applause!!!!

      Wish I could mod in a discussion I was participating in!!!

      Very nice.

  300. Quackwatch - Electrical Sensitivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out this article on Quackwatch. It contains a detailed discussion of the studies that have been done on this and many of the research papers cited are available on line and linked to.

  301. High voltage breast implants by Grax · · Score: 1

    Just because they haven't been declared dangerous does not mean that they are safe. Roller-blading behind a mini-van on the freeway at 75 miles per hour has not been declared dangerous. It must be safe, right?

    There are a number of studies on both sides in both issues and I know the jury is still out on breast implants. I'm not sure that the power line issue is one that anyone is looking at except for the owners of the power lines who need to commision studies to show how safe they are.

    On breast implants, it seems obvious to me that the introduction of foreign matter surgically implanted into the body is not a good idea. Whether the final studies determine it to be "safe" or not I would certainly advise people to wait until the studies are completed and I'd still advise anyone I like to not have the implants except as a form of reconstructive surgery.

    Out of curiousity, how do you know that high voltage power lines do not cause cancer? Do you live near high voltage power lines and not have cancer? or have you studied all the studies and made an intelligent determination based on all the facts?

  302. Conundrum by Mignon · · Score: 2
    How does an electrically-sensitive person update this web page without exposing themselves to the electrical fields they are trying to avoid?

    Maybe this is a reason to pursue development of an all-optical solar-powered computer.

  303. What about Visible Light? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want to get rid of all EM radiation there, they would also have to live in total darkness, as visible light is also EM.

  304. Re:They already have done this. by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1
    Personally, I think that if this is such a problem for all these people, they should all just get together and go buy an island somewhere so they can leave the rest of the world alone. I really resent some nut who moves into a town and expects the whole town to bow to his every wacked out whim.

    in a sense, "they" have been doing exactly that for thousands of years, to only temporary benefit. in recent history, the severely limited powers of the US federal government were designed by political geniuses who wished people, cities, states, i.e. "local" societies, to preserve near-total self-determination as long as they universally honored the basic political/moral freedoms enumerated in the first 8 amendments.

    now that the federales operate without limit, americans, too, are beginning to face the question, "where can i live a reasonable life according to my principles without tyranny?"

    as waco amply demonstrated, if their way of life was viewed as a threat to the way of life that sustains the government, they indeed would need to buy an island somewhere outside of governmental influence [unlike colonialists throughout time who staked claims solely through military superiority, there is no longer any usable land that doesn't necessitate "purchase" from some person or group].

    historically speaking, however, there is no evidence that the protection of a new frontier lasts more than a few, short generations.

    in the future, anyone wishing to create and preserve what they believe to be a morally, technologically, or medically pristine community will need to either have a few billion dollars with which to "buy an island somewhere" [not to mention an elite force of diplomat-lobbyists skilled in international law to protect the commune's right to exist, or at least to convince other governments to provide that protection], or they will have to somehow convince their federal establishments to cede regulatory powers back to local establishments. of course, such an arrangement has its own set of problems, the most important of which being that governments never voluntarily cede to civilians powers they have taken for themselves.

    buti nga
    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  305. how does that compare to paint chips? by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    If the amount of lead that leached into the water were at least equal to the amount that a kid gets eating paint flakes, then I'd say there's the potential for damage. I have no physical measurements on either of these. But I'd imagine it would take a while for enough oxides to cover the inside of the pipes to prevent most leaching.

  306. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by M-G · · Score: 2

    L. Ron Hubbard has written a book too... :)

  307. Another Jim Jones in Mendo County by MendoMole · · Score: 1

    Here's what's really going on. First of all, all of you who argue the merits of the science miss the point. Arthur is a con man. A very smart one, with an ego the size of Jim Jones' (another former Mendocino County resident)
    He can scramble the science because he knows that many many people aren't educated enough to be able to tell the difference and he gets enough of them. He doesn't care how prestigious a scientist or institution debunks him!
    Arthur has tasted the sweetness of celebrity and can't stop. He's living like a rock star up here, with adoring fans like Christy Wagner swooning over his every pronoucement and everyone else shaking with fear. Reporters call him up to ask his opinion and get a quote from him! He's basking in the warm glow of Being Someone. So, here's the scoop - He's just an ego-maniac! As for his contention that they've saved Mendocino as a wireless free zone, that's crap - all he's done is stop the local school-owned ISP from selling wireless, which is a pity, because their profits go towards free or greatly reduced internet access for all Mendocino students and teachers. The commercial companies are signing people up left and right. There's wireless all over Mendocino!
    Here's a little history on the sick teacher Christy Wagner. She got the job a couple of years ago. It wasn't working out but the school was reluctant to fire her. Over the summer she decided she wanted to be a writer but couldn't figure out how to live off a writer's salary. So, a couple of sessions with Arthur on how to play the disability game, and Voila! she's suddenly sooooo sick....and on Medical leave. The School Board approves it so they can get rid of a bad teacher, but the taxpayers have to pay her salary.
    It's just a scam and pretty much everyone knows it.
    Mendocino is where people move to when they find Berekely too conservative. There's a lot of trust fund ex-hippies living up here, and they don't want people who might not be so left wing moving into the community and "taking" it over.

  308. Bottled Water by SirNonya · · Score: 1

    Where I live, the standards for city water are HIGHER than those for bottled water. Hmmmm...

  309. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by pangloss · · Score: 1

    He has, and you and your post shall be smitten for using his name in vain ;)

  310. ya well nuthing a little mend endo cant fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Mendocino also allows anyone to grow upto 100k worth of weed on their property...who needs wireless when you can get really baked.

  311. Re:Oh no! Certain doom! by M-G · · Score: 2

    Nah...I was careful to leave out any disparaging remarks...unless they want to read something into the smiley....

  312. ehh? by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    I may just be biased (Can't even hear MYSELF over the hum of all this equipment) but, do these people sound like complete blithering idiots to anyone else?

    Tin-foil hat brigade indeed.

    I don't think the Amish would take them, these people would probably start complaning that proximity to hay or horses or something causes them illness. If anything, I'd say it's all the BULLSHIT.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*