Except you are confusing a transit and a consumer endpoint. Transit providers normally peer, but an endpoint is going to have more traffic coming in then going out because their consumers are requesting it, ALWAYS, but this is the first time they have been able to pressure people into these types of agreements.
Peering agreements between transit providers is fine, but not when an endpoint bullies a service providor.
entrapment is doing something to get you to commit a crime. The officer did not do anything to trap someone into committing a crime so how is it entrapment?
Except labeling a link as a different link is not illegal, otherwise all of slashdot would be in jail. There was nothing stolen from the Seattle times. Use of a trademark is not theft like stealing a crowbar.
Even still if you want to use the analogy, in this case the warrant specifically allowed them to go into Home Depot and steal a crowbar.
How is it a "fail"? You agreed with my logic in your on statement. Maybe you dont understand logic?
If
Search and seizure without a warrant is illegal
And
Obtaining a warrant allows you to engage in search and seizure
Then your statement confirms that it allows the officer to break the law, just limited to the scope of the warrant.
Please name one thing that a warrant allows that would not be breaking the law without the warrant.
Warrants dont always have to be served. You are thinking of things like arrest warrant. There are other warrants as well, such as warrants to tap a phone line. Those do not have to be served either.
And when someone searches or seizes your property without a warrant is it not illegal? You are defeated by your own statement, however I will add the definition which further defeats you.
warrant wôrnt,wärnt/Submit noun 1. a document issued by a legal or government official authorizing the police or some other body to make an arrest, search premises, or carry out some other action relating to the administration of justice.
I think you needed to look up the definition, notice the last part.
Merchant needs, not wants. Merchants dont need your data, they want your data. And I dont want to use a payment system that gives it to them, no matter the rewards.
Would you rather they use a massive hairball of interdependence that the developers themselves state are required even if you try and claim they are not?
Not necessarily. It is the best interest for what those companies want, and they believe that they can keep, regardless of the issues, enough customers to offset the change.
Please tell me why it is needed for servers. What does it replace that was broken in servers? It has nothing to do with relearning things, it has to do with a solution looking for a break, when there is not one. And you are still ignoring the blatant examples of it NOT WORKING
You are only fooling yourself. Apparently you are a desktop person who is not willing to put in the work yourself, but for the server systemd is no where near needed for anything. It is a nightmarish system that is going to cause a lot of head aches when you want to do virtually anything advanced, IE outside of what the developers planned for.
Except they are not working fine, and some are even explained very thoroughly in these posts, above and before your post, leading me to the conclusion that you ARE just ignoring everyone who isnt drinking the kool-aid.
Wait, we have been told all this time that it is a systemv replacement first and for most, now you are telling us something different? Now it is a supervisord replacement mostly?
Slashdot Mirror
you can always move to another state more in-line with your ideology without renouncing your citizenship.
In theory that works great, in practice it does not work at all.
Except you are confusing a transit and a consumer endpoint. Transit providers normally peer, but an endpoint is going to have more traffic coming in then going out because their consumers are requesting it, ALWAYS, but this is the first time they have been able to pressure people into these types of agreements.
Peering agreements between transit providers is fine, but not when an endpoint bullies a service providor.
Good job assuming the alternative would not have been the same, or worse.
entrapment is doing something to get you to commit a crime. The officer did not do anything to trap someone into committing a crime so how is it entrapment?
Except labeling a link as a different link is not illegal, otherwise all of slashdot would be in jail. There was nothing stolen from the Seattle times. Use of a trademark is not theft like stealing a crowbar.
Even still if you want to use the analogy, in this case the warrant specifically allowed them to go into Home Depot and steal a crowbar.
How is it a "fail"? You agreed with my logic in your on statement. Maybe you dont understand logic?
If
Search and seizure without a warrant is illegal
And
Obtaining a warrant allows you to engage in search and seizure
Then your statement confirms that it allows the officer to break the law, just limited to the scope of the warrant.
Please name one thing that a warrant allows that would not be breaking the law without the warrant.
Warrants dont always have to be served. You are thinking of things like arrest warrant. There are other warrants as well, such as warrants to tap a phone line. Those do not have to be served either.
And when someone searches or seizes your property without a warrant is it not illegal? You are defeated by your own statement, however I will add the definition which further defeats you.
warrant
wôrnt,wärnt/Submit
noun
1.
a document issued by a legal or government official authorizing the police or some other body to make an arrest, search premises, or carry out some other action relating to the administration of justice.
I think you needed to look up the definition, notice the last part.
There was no entrapment. The person did a bomb threat, all they were doing was locating him.
What is illegal about it? They got a warrant, and sent a targeted email with a link people would not normally go to.
Merchant needs, not wants. Merchants dont need your data, they want your data. And I dont want to use a payment system that gives it to them, no matter the rewards.
Better than if one of the conservatives would have been in office, not much, but still better.
(as in none of that Unlimited* stuff that is out there where they drop you to caveman speeds within a gig of usage)
Would you rather they use a massive hairball of interdependence that the developers themselves state are required even if you try and claim they are not?
Because vi just works naturally on their flat files....
Not necessarily. It is the best interest for what those companies want, and they believe that they can keep, regardless of the issues, enough customers to offset the change.
So again, double the overhead, double the space, just to get BACK to a system that works....
No, grep, cat and all the rest work just fine if you change the format.
And who has implied that?
Please tell me why it is needed for servers. What does it replace that was broken in servers? It has nothing to do with relearning things, it has to do with a solution looking for a break, when there is not one. And you are still ignoring the blatant examples of it NOT WORKING
You have the inability to scroll up and see, I dont know, threads like http://linux.slashdot.org/comm...?
So your answer is no, and the poster above me is completely wrong....
You are only fooling yourself. Apparently you are a desktop person who is not willing to put in the work yourself, but for the server systemd is no where near needed for anything. It is a nightmarish system that is going to cause a lot of head aches when you want to do virtually anything advanced, IE outside of what the developers planned for.
No, we are for actual separation of duties. We dont like the system where nothing is interdependent, and we dont want a windows clone.
Except they are not working fine, and some are even explained very thoroughly in these posts, above and before your post, leading me to the conclusion that you ARE just ignoring everyone who isnt drinking the kool-aid.
Wait, we have been told all this time that it is a systemv replacement first and for most, now you are telling us something different? Now it is a supervisord replacement mostly?