Slashdot Mirror


Skilled Foreign Workers Treated as Indentured Servants

theodp writes: A year-long investigation by NBC Bay Area's Investigative Unit and The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) raises questions about the H-1B visa program. In a five-part story that includes a mini-graphic novel called Techsploitation, CIR describes how the system rewards job brokers who steal wages and entrap Indian tech workers in the U.S., including the awarding of half a billion dollars in Federal tech contracts to those with labor violations. "Shackling workers to their jobs," CIR found after interviewing workers and reviewing government agency and court documents, "is such an entrenched business practice that it has even spread to U.S. nationals. This bullying persists at the bottom of a complex system that supplies workers to some of America's richest and most successful companies, such as Cisco Systems Inc., Verizon and Apple Inc."

In a presumably unrelated move, the U.S. changed its H-1B record retention policy last week, declaring that records used for labor certification, whether in paper or electronic, "are temporary records and subject to destruction" after five years under the new policy. "There was no explanation for the change, and it is perplexing to researchers," reports Computerworld. "The records under threat are called Labor Condition Applications (LCA), which identify the H-1B employer, worksite, the prevailing wage, and the wage paid to the worker." Lindsay Lowell, director of policy studies at the Institute for the Study of International Migration at Georgetown University, added: "It undermines our ability to evaluate what the government does and, in today's world, retaining electronic records like the LCA is next to costless [a full year's LCA data is less than 1 GB]." President Obama, by the way, is expected to use his executive authority to expand the H-1B program after the midterm elections.

284 comments

  1. Was pretty obvious by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is anyone even remotely surprised by this?

    1. Re:Was pretty obvious by CimmerianX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hopefully the non-IT, general public will be.

    2. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice how it's "The U.S." and not "the Obama Administration".

      He's the one that keep pushing for more "Indentured Servants".

      Ironic.

    3. Re:Was pretty obvious by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Not really, but it would be cooler if we weren't as bad as Dubai. The weak are being exploited by the powerful all over the world.

    4. Re:Was pretty obvious by Old97 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Before him it was the Bush Administration. Before Bush it was Clinton. Minions of the ruling class always do their bidding regardless of major party affiliation.

      --
      Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    5. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you are not allowed to kill homosexuals.

    6. Re:Was pretty obvious by operator_error · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The LA Times has recently covered how Electronics For Imaging (EFI) clearly underpaid Indian immigrant laborers. $1.21 an hour in Silicon Valley, 122 hours in a week, and no overtime. Thank goodness EFI got caught!

      http://www.latimes.com/busines...

      Still, I don't think the non-IT general public knows an industry called IT *labor* even exists. Except for the Obama-care website snafu that is. (Maybe in Oregon, the folks there know about Oracle Corp. by now) Millions of iPhones are begging for greater robotic assemblies, because those gizmos don't build themselves, and it'll happen.

    7. Re:Was pretty obvious by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Troll
      From the synopsis:

      "President Obama, by the way, is expected to use his executive authority to expand the H-1B program after the midterm elections."

      So...how's that "Hope and Change" working out for all of ya'll out there that voted for him...twice?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:Was pretty obvious by thaylin · · Score: 0

      Better than if one of the conservatives would have been in office, not much, but still better.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    9. Re:Was pretty obvious by knightghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Time to form a union. No, seriously. STEM workers have been absolutely screwed to the point where no intelligent person should pursue that career in the USA. Talk with nurses to see how to make some progress.

    10. Re:Was pretty obvious by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Yeah and fucktards like you voted Bush in twice and he did the same thing. And I call you a fucktard because you obviously ignore that part so you can say something stupid and accusatory about the guy you don't like, who does the same things as the guy you do like. It's not because he's black is it? It couldn't be, you know lots of blacks right.

      LOL, this is what happens when people confuse their candidate winning with them winning.

    11. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet. just wait. If we can go backwards on human-slavery, we can eventually do anything.

    12. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      How dare you suggest such a thing. Are you a communist?!!

    13. Re:Was pretty obvious by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Before him it was the Bush Administration. Before Bush it was Clinton. Minions of the ruling class always do their bidding regardless of major party affiliation.

      Exactly. Let's not get wrapped up in partisanship. It's wrong when either side does it, and both sides have.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    14. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you can't honestly say he wasn't carried across the finish line because of his color. I will say this, I DON'T judge him by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character. And in that department, he is woefully lacking.

      As to the point of the article, The vast majority of immigrants that come into the country, either illegally or "legally" end up being grist for the grind. Underpaid, compulsory yet inaccessible requirements for legalization via an official route, stigmatization, abuse and outright theft for those that try to get here legally and worse for those that break the law to come here are normal and even standardized in many ways.

    15. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former member of the CSA, no.

    16. Re:Was pretty obvious by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Technically what EFI did was wrong. But really it wasn't as egregious for the reasons some make it out to be. The workers were brought in for a few weeks to help with a data center move, probably put up in hotels and lived on expense accounts. Were they really "immigrant laborers"? Or just earning their same salary but working temporarily at a different company location?

    17. Re:Was pretty obvious by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's been pretty clear for a very long time now that the entire H1B program has become nothing more than a legal indentured slavery program for U.S. corporations, one that is intended to artificially lower U.S. worker wages and exploit cheap foreign labor without the stigma of "offshoring." This whole pathetic "STEM labor shortage" charade that the big-corps and the U.S. government are colluding on is one of the saddest dog-and-pony shows in U.S. labor history. A lot of degreed programmers can't even get a decent job anymore that pays even a living wage, and still Mark Zuckerberg et. al. are running to Congress crying "We can't get any American workers anymore, give us more H1B's!!!"

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    18. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, you're right. I'll grant you they are not fulltime immigrant workers. But then again, why were on-site conditions required by foreign nationals using contract conditions? As if EFI of California did not know what the minimum wage of California is, or that local workers were otherwise unavailable to perform the work at the skill-level of the requirement (I am assuming to install an OS and then to setup networking, based on the news reports).

      disclosure: I am appalled.

    19. Re:Was pretty obvious by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So...how's that "Hope and Change" working out

      I suppose you think Mitt Romney would have ended it??? Yeah, real champion of the little guy that one.

      The fact is that NO ONE who runs for President or Congress anymore opposes H1B's. They're all now completely owned by corporations. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM.

      Yes, YOUR GUY TOO!

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    20. Re:Was pretty obvious by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      still Mark Zuckerberg et. al. are running to Congress crying "We can't get any American workers anymore, give us more H1B's!!!"

      Of course, they actually mean, "we can't get any cheap American workers anymore... OMG our profit margins!"

      Cut them some slack; they're just trying to be "competitive" - which means "do the minimum required". (for when you see that in explanations as to why your raises/bonuses suck.)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    21. Re:Was pretty obvious by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      I suppose you think Mitt Romney would have ended it??? Yeah, real champion of the little guy that one.

      Obama's campaign promised hope and change, regardless of what the other candidates said about themselves. The GP had a point.

    22. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Technically what EFI did was wrong. But really it wasn't as egregious for the reasons some make it out to be. The workers were brought in for a few weeks to help with a data center move, probably put up in hotels and lived on expense accounts. Were they really "immigrant laborers"? Or just earning their same salary but working temporarily at a different company location?

      Yes, this exactly! I am tired of local authorities telling me that my slaves are illegal in this country. They are beaten daily, fed and raped in accordance with local statutes in the country in which they were enslaved.

    23. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope, and they don't care. They don't care that their cheap shitty chocolate comes from slaves. They don't care than Nike uses child labor. They don't care about the abusive practices involved in processing shrimp. They don't care about overfishing. They don't care about the pink goo in their food. They don't care about air pollution.

      Face it, people are fucking stupid, and NO they don't care. If they did, actually, they'd probably be in favor of it, as long as it didn't happen to them.

    24. Re:Was pretty obvious by slashtivus · · Score: 1

      Confederate States of America? Gosh you should be supporting this (and are also very old).

    25. Re:Was pretty obvious by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Is anyone even remotely surprised by this?

      Maybe all the commenters here who have maintained that H-1B workers are paid the same as domestic workers and don't contribute to wage suppression in the IT industry.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    26. Re:Was pretty obvious by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nope, and they don't care. They don't care that their cheap shitty chocolate comes from slaves. They don't care than Nike uses child labor. They don't care about the abusive practices involved in processing shrimp. They don't care about overfishing. They don't care about the pink goo in their food. They don't care about air pollution.

      Face it, people are fucking stupid, and NO they don't care. If they did, actually, they'd probably be in favor of it, as long as it didn't happen to them.

      Americans (people, really) care about what they're told to care about. Everyone is terrified of Ebola and ISIL and know something must be done; and it's not because of their good judgement and risk analysis.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    27. Re:Was pretty obvious by pooh666 · · Score: 1

      That is almost worse. For a long time I blamed Republicans(rightfully), but there isn't a good alternative anymore either.

    28. Re:Was pretty obvious by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      That is almost worse. For a long time I blamed Republicans(rightfully), but there isn't a good alternative anymore either.

      I agree that both political parties are a disaster. I heard a Ralph Nader interview today, and he was basically calling out Hillary Clinton for being (I forget exactly) corporatist and militaristic, just like the other candidates.

      I seems to me there must be some kind of structural problem in our political system, as just about everyone who becomes a Congressman or President ends up being just as lousy as his predecessors.

    29. Re:Was pretty obvious by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Better than if one of the conservatives would have been in office, not much, but still better.

      I dunno.

      Honestly, I think obama has hit a new low in overall presidency and administration gathered about him on pretty much ALL fronts.

      He has in the past couple years, bottomed out past bush.

      So, anyone but obama? Sure...I really don't know how anyone could do worse (I just hope I'm not surprised by the next guy).

      At this point, I'd rather have random guy off the streets than what we currently have in power.

      I think the random guy in the streets would do less damage to our country and its constitution that what almost in so many ways seems active derailment and dismantlement of what the US has built up over the last couple of centuries by the current admin.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Was pretty obvious by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. Let's not get wrapped up in partisanship. It's wrong when either side does it, and both sides have.

      Except one side claims to be on the side of the workers, and the other side... doesn't.

    31. Re:Was pretty obvious by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't fucking matter what workers were, who they were, or where they came from. They and the company are bound by our laws while they're here. THE COMPANY BROKE THE FUCKING LAW BY PAYING THEM UNDER MINIMUM WAGE. FULL STOP. FUCKING PERIOD.

      Are you retarded? It's more than technically wrong. THEY BROKE THE FUCKING LAW.

      Not egregious? They paid about 20% of the already too low FUCKING MINIMUM WAGE. How is this not "egregious"? You really are a moron.

      --
      That is all.
    32. Re:Was pretty obvious by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      STEM is a stretch though. Many of these workers are very much the low tech workers. IT grunts, support desk, installing equipment, always recommended purchases from major manufacturers they learned about in school, etc. They fill the basic jobs and are interchangeable cogs. That's why they have labor brokers, because they're hired as warm bodies rather than as key employees. These are the modern factory floor workers, with the difference of being slightly skilled. The media doesn't seem to see this because they think that using a mouse is the same as being high tech.

      Sure there are the best and brightest students and employees from those countries, and they deserve to get in on visas because they do great work. But there are so many who go to the average schools where they teach only the current fashionable job skills, knowing enough to get a certificate, then they end up taking jobs that can already be filled by workers in the US. I honestly think a high school education in the US is good enough to fill many of these jobs.

      In the past it was about looking for the cheapest workers who can use a wrench, today it's about finding the cheapest workers who can use some generic technology.

    33. Re:Was pretty obvious by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Let's not get wrapped up in partisanship. It's wrong when either side does it, and both sides have.

      Except one side claims to be on the side of the workers, and the other side... doesn't.

      I'mmmmm.... not sure I want to take that bait. Best to just walk away.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    34. Re:Was pretty obvious by towermac · · Score: 1

      Not sure what I think, so all I can go on is what he's actually done. Governing a state full of Democrats, he got universal healthcare, job growth, and wages that rose faster than inflation. That seems good for the little guy, at least on the surface. And they still liked him right up until he ran for President.

      So the 'however bad Obama is, Romney would have been worse' is starting to wear thin with me, and now I'm not even sure what it's based on.

    35. Re:Was pretty obvious by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There are two tiers of these H1B workers though. The smart people, where companies want to hire that specific person because they have great experience and recommendations, and the average seat warmers and the below average grunts. So while the best H1B workers make a decent wage there are all of those who don't. The labor brokers don't deal with the stars, they deal in filling positions where the actual person doesn't matter just the fact that the person has a certificate.

      There are even the workers who aren't really H1B either. They're rotated in on other visas for a short term, maybe six months or so, then shipped back home again. They really work for the office back home but they're here because the job may require some face to face meetings or quick turn around rather than being done entirely overseas.

    36. Re:Was pretty obvious by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      Oh not exactly... but Socialist, hell yes!

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    37. Re:Was pretty obvious by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      What corporation owns Senator Bernie Sanders (I VT)?

      I guess those nasty "unions" who hold "elections" to "represent" their largely blue-collar workforce to ask for things like "fair pay" and "increases in the minimum wage"? Oh yeah, those little guys. ...but let's pretend all politicians are equal -- because cynacism is easy. That will surely change the system.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    38. Re:Was pretty obvious by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      That is almost worse. For a long time I blamed Republicans(rightfully), but there isn't a good alternative anymore either.

      I agree that both political parties are a disaster. I heard a Ralph Nader interview today, and he was basically calling out Hillary Clinton for being (I forget exactly) corporatist and militaristic, just like the other candidates.

      I seems to me there must be some kind of structural problem in our political system, as just about everyone who becomes a Congressman or President ends up being just as lousy as his predecessors.

      Washington pointed out that the rise of political parties would be detrimental to our political system. Nothing causes me to doubt his prescience at all.

    39. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Both sides ???? I think you will find it is just ONE side.... the 1%.
      They will bribe (opps I mean make a campaign donation), bully (I mean have lobbyists discuss), blackmail (we KNOW.....) whom ever is in their way of them making more money (and you making less).

    40. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Time to form a union. No, seriously. STEM workers have been absolutely screwed to the point where no intelligent person should pursue that career in the USA.

      Yeah, we wanna get screwed by union bosses, not regular bosses!

      Fuck that noise. As an "intelligent person" you must take command of your own employment terms. If you don't know how to negotiate them, learn how. If you don't have skills worth negotiation, learn some. Learning is not hard. Get your ass to the library. Read. If it doesn't help, read something else. Take classes. Practice. Go to job interviews, even if you currently have a job. Nobody else will ever have your financial interests as their top priority. It's all up to you.

    41. Re:Was pretty obvious by tjb · · Score: 1

      Of course, they actually mean, "we can't get any cheap American workers anymore... OMG our profit margins!"

      Where exactly does this idea come from? Facebook is renowned for paying their devs extraordinarily well (like $200K+excellent equity package). If they were looking to save money, they could just drop to the 70th percentile and probably still do ok on the hiring side.

    42. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Minions of the ruling class always do their bidding regardless of major party affiliation.

      There really are two distinct parties in US government:

      The bought-and-paid for politicians - ~90% of incumbents
      The independent politicians - whoever is left.

    43. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only option is to vote strategically - vote your conscience even if you are 100% sure the candidate will lose.

      The only way party platforms change is when they are afraid of losing an election. When you vote for a little guy it puts the fear of losing into them, like the way Nader "spoiled" Gore's chance at election. After that the democrats had to adopt some of the green party's positions for fear of losing again. So even thought Nader lost he still made progress. Politics is a battle of inches, don't let the big rhetoric fool into thinking otherwise. One inch at a time.

    44. Re:Was pretty obvious by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      The fact is that NO ONE who runs for President or Congress anymore opposes H1B's. They're all now completely owned by corporations. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM.

      Yes, YOUR GUY TOO!

      Even RON PAUL voted to increase H1-B visas while he was in Congress.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    45. Re:Was pretty obvious by Immerman · · Score: 1

      > And in that department, he is woefully lacking.

      Well, obviously - he's a politician isn't he? I let myself believe the "hope and change" spiel enough to vote for him in 2008, but whether it was campaign lies or shadow-government pressure, he rapidly proved he wasn't going to be the president he promised to be. I still would have voted against the much worse putocratic sock-puppet he was running against in 2012, except that it was pretty obvious for weeks ahead of time that Obama had the election in the bag, and I felt no compulsion to give him a greater "mandate" to keep up the bad work.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    46. Re:Was pretty obvious by Kumiorava · · Score: 1

      I understand that there is great concern in immigrants arriving to work in US, but I don't think closing off the borders is solution. You can ask yourself two questions:

      1. If you wanted to go and someone was willing to hire you abroad, should you be able to work in an another country?
      2. If a person from another county wanted to come and someone was willing to hire that person in US, should he/she be able to work in US?

      The whole thing boils down to this, freedom of being employed anywhere in the world. It does sound crazy but we are no longer living in closed societies, at least I do hope that is the case. If H1B visa program is shut down, there are virtually no legal paths to US job market for foreigners.

      There needs to be two changes to the work visa rules:

      1. H1B worker is able to seek another job during his/her visa duration, as long as the job is similar or better than his current job. Currently not allowed.
      2. Is laid off the period for seeking new employment is 6 months before needing to leave. Currently it is 7 days.

      Those two changes would make foreign workers able to raise their salaries and leave abusive employers. This would bring healthier work environment for everyone and increases in salary across foreign and domestic workers.

    47. Re:Was pretty obvious by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Well this is Slashdot...
      So it still gets reported as news.

    48. Re:Was pretty obvious by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      And I suppose you think that Obama is the first lying hypocrite ever elected to office in the US?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    49. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engineers have this irrational fear of unions. For some reason they think one person can get a better deal from the King. Then again, most of them think they are hot shit and everybody else is a stupid mother fucker. I think it is the Dunning-Kruger effect in action.

    50. Re:Was pretty obvious by vux984 · · Score: 2

      It doesn't fucking matter what workers were, who they were, or where they came from. They and the company are bound by our laws while they're here.

      Lets say your an IT contractor in Rajkot, India, you negotiate $1000 to deploy some systems onsite for a week, the company covers your living expenses. The put you on a plane from Rajkot to Mumbai, you work long hours for a week, you get paid and you go home happy.

      A week later, you negotiate another $1000 to deploy some more systems, onsite. They put you on a plane, and this time you land in New York, work long hours for a week, you get paid and you go home:
      a) happy?
      b) horrifically exploited and ridiculously underpaid?

      What's the difference?

      Not that I'm disagreeing with you here -- I DO think it was egregious and expoitative. But its a little more complicated than simply paying them less than miniumum wage as you allege.

      For example lets say your an odd jobs contractor just getting started. You get offered a contract to install a window -- you have a look and agree to $50 thinking it will take a couple hours. Turns out it was more complicated than you thought, you spend all day on it and are now effectively making less than minimum wage? Is that illegal? Not even slightly.

    51. Re:Was pretty obvious by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      The critical problems are what you pointed out. A group of workers from somewhere else is not a major problem. A group of workers who can be legally abused is.

      People who are in the country illegally are in constant risk of being deported, and have no legal recourse against abuse. This is, I believe, the worst part of such illegal immigrants. H-1Bs are in constant risk of being fired and then deported, and have no effective legal recourse against abuse.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    52. Re:Was pretty obvious by vux984 · · Score: 1

      . If you don't know how to negotiate them, learn how. If you don't have skills worth negotiation, learn some.

      Yeah, good advice, but its not that simple. As you say, that all requires some skills in marketing, accounting, business management, negotiation, law, etc, etc.

      They spent 10+ year in school learning about esoteric academic pursuit. They didn't have time to pick up an MBA on the side. And reading a self-help "How to make friends and influence people book" isn't going to make up for that. Worse, they have to take their minimal business and negotiation skills and deal with management that has ONLY done that. That's all they do. That's what they do. That's what they went to school to learn to do.

      Its simply not going to be a 'fair' negotiation. Not ever.

      Nobody else will ever have your financial interests as their top priority. It's all up to you.

      Hence the need to unionize. Sure, paying someone (union reps/management) to represent your interests isn't perfect. They still ultimately have their own interests at heart -- but by paying them to represent you at least you pull some strings -- and they at least bring to the table the experience, knowledge, and skills you don't have to deal with management effectively on your own.

      Further, unions benefit from the collective bargaining power that an individual employee rarely has. After all, the employer can generally live just fine if you stop showing up for work... but you still need to buy groceries and pay the mortgage, making most employment negotiations inherently largely one-sided.

      I recognize that unions have issues, but your suggestion that everyone can simply learn a whole new field of expertise on top of the one they trained for, and magically not need to eat or shelter their family so as to have a level playing field when negotiating employment terms is naive beyond beleif.

      Sure... some of us, once we're established, have money saved up, have income separate from work, and have experience and skills and knowledge that are uniquely valuable... we start to have bargaining power when it comes to employment.

      But most people don't. And there is no simple way of resolving that. Unions are a better option than most.

    53. Re:Was pretty obvious by RobertLTux · · Score: 2

      This is the biggest problem with H-1B visas.

      Wanna bet that the following has happened with H-1B holders

      1 holder finds out about something illegal or otherwise questionable in the business And is then told to keep silent or you will get fired and deported.

      2 requiring bribes to keep your job (or "extra" fees that a US worker does not even hear about)

      3 Off Books/Unpaid work

      4 requiring Daughters/Wives "model" for or "entertain" the managers/ friends

      or worse

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    54. Re:Was pretty obvious by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      What's more important, the claims of one sock-puppet or the actions of the person wearing both sock-puppets?

    55. Re: Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as it goes, I was terrified of the MATH of ebola long before it was popular (I'm an early adopter, I guess). but that was because I ran the numbers, and noticed that there is not 1 curve,but 2 curves for every country: before a proper response and after.

      Now, I can do something about it: it's called limited quarantine. I can reduce my contacts with others.

      But on. The subject of H1B and slave labor, I really can't do anything about it. I've done what I can to vote with my dollars, but I am excluded from power by those who are paranoid about not being in control.

    56. Re: Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush and obama are two sides of the same coin. As will be any alternative we are offered.

    57. Re: Was pretty obvious by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      why can't both be true? That Obama is better than the Republican alternative, and that he has hit a new low in the presidency?

      Let's consider previous presidents: Can anyone argue against Reagan>GHWB>WJC>GWB>BO?

      But now look where our biggest unexpected steps down were: GWB (whole new department of Terrorism, 2 wars) and GHWB (recession crash).

      Not to cherrypick, I'd argue you can go back further than that.

      And that isn't that Republican declared principles are wrong -- I agree with some of them them -- but the Republicans do more damage at once, given the same conditions.

      But for those who want to argue that Barak's damage is worse than any, yes, I'd agree.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    58. Re:Was pretty obvious by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      And I suppose you think that Obama is the first lying hypocrite ever elected to office in the US?

      Nope, I am saying, however..that he is now the new "worst" at being a lying hypocrite...with incompetent added on top of the mix.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    59. Re:Was pretty obvious by aurizon · · Score: 1

      Now, Will US workers revolt when they are set to India to be paid $1.21, in accordance with local laws and scale? Or will they quit, solving a problem.

    60. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you certain they paid them less than minimum wage or that's what it amounted to after they paid off their hotels and expense accounts? I've heard multiple versions of this story.

    61. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except one side claims to be on the side of the workers, and the other side... doesn't.

      The side that is not claiming to be on the side of workers DOES claim to be on the side of "Americans". EVERY CHANCE THEY GET.

      As the previous poster said, let's not get wrapped up in partisanship.

    62. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor developers, that think they DESERVE the highest possible wages and guaranteed employment just because they hold a piece of paper for a college.

      Cry me a river.

    63. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A person illegally in the country, who is deported has not been abused. Their presence in the country illegally is the abuse.

      The failure to deport them immediately is an abuse of executive, and judicial responsibility.

      But deportation is not an abuse.

    64. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RANDROID ALERT! Who are you? James T Kampfe?

    65. Re:Was pretty obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm here on an H1B and make more than $200k a year for writing code. That's nothing special where I work. I would have no problem changing jobs if that's what I wanted. What you are describing may be one use of H1Bs visas, but it's not the only thing that is done with H1Bs.

    66. Re:Was pretty obvious by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't be granted a visa for employment in India at such a wage (AKA "local wages").

      To be eligible for a visa, the company must pay a minimum wage for foreign workers which, although are quite low by western standards (as of 2012, it was US $25,000/year or about 15 lakh rupees), it does mean foreign workers will earn a wage that would still be above the poverty line for a 4-person household in the US (http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/14poverty.cfm) and will be quite comfortable living in most parts of India.

      While I haven't looked in to the US visa program myself (except *for* myself - we hire local workers where we operate: in the US, I'm required to hire a certain number of US residents; and in India I'm only allowed to have a certain percentage of my total workforce be foreign workers) perhaps the US visa program needs to take a page from India's and:
      1. Prescribe a base salary for foreign workers (if it doesn't already) so that these companies who many of us recognize are blatantly abusing the system will no longer be able to save money by importing "cheap labour" in the way that they have been doing and
      2. Perhaps there could be a limit on the percentage of a company's workforce which can be foreign citizens (people who gain residency/green-cards on their own merits would not contribute to this percentage), but it could prevent companies filling seats with H1-B workers.

      **I'm personally not a citizen of either the US or India but we operate in these and other countries, and I'm *definitely* not anti-immigration -- but the solution *might* solve quite a lot of the issues with the H-visa abuse. It might also have the side-effect of killing TCS/Infosys business models.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  2. Time for Solidarity? by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's time to organize the world's programmers and make it clear to business that we won't tolerate this treatment any longer. It doesn't matter if we form a union or not as long as we band together to protect our common interests as programmers.

    1. Re:Time for Solidarity? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's literally the definition of a union, though.

      I mean, more effective unions have mandatory membership, but a union itself is literally a group of employees in a field banding together to protecting their common interests.

    2. Re:Time for Solidarity? by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Just don't train your replacements.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    3. Re:Time for Solidarity? by eclectro · · Score: 1

      You'll notice that the US spends more than practically any country, and gets among the worst results.

      You need to include those on the hardware end as well. Otherwise companies would just end up shafting a different type of tech worker. So not just programmers but tech workers in general.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re: Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work from home and make 100k. I have no complaints.

    5. Re: Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And we can make a program to streamline the process. That sounds like more fun. Screw the union, let's focus on the program. We'll need source control...

    6. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Technician · · Score: 4, Informative

      This trickles down to the US workers too. Here is how it works.

      In a downsize you become unemployed. In looking for work, most openings are either entry level or contract positions with no benifits.

      You earn too much to be eligable for Obama Care and the company plan is employee paid. If you have a spouse without employment, a mortguage, and need health care, there is a distinct lack of family wage jobs that isn't sucked dry by insurance in excess of 2K/Month. My COBRA insurance is higher than the mortgauge. This payment pretty much sucks up all expendable income normally used for living expenses.

      Many younger workers simply forgo the insurance payments. Older workers don't have this option.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    7. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unions have mandatory membership for a damn good reason. It used to be that company men could come to your house at night and "persuade" you to voluntarily withdraw from the union. With mandatory membership this doesn't work.

    8. Re:Time for Solidarity? by JeffOwl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My COBRA insurance is higher than the mortgauge. This payment pretty much sucks up all expendable income normally used for living expenses.Many younger workers simply forgo the insurance payments.

      Wait, I was under the impression that these health insurance exchanges would create a competitive marketplace where people could buy insurance at reasonable prices even if they weren't eligible for subsidies. You mean that isn't true?

    9. Re:Time for Solidarity? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's time to organize the world's programmers ... to protect our common interests as programmers.

      What "common interests" are shared by the world's programmers? Even with the exploitation, these Indian workers are likely better off than they would be back in India. So Indian programmers likely would want America to keep the H1B program. In my opinion, the proper "fix" is to eliminate H1Bs and give foreign tech workers visas that are not tied to any employer, so that they can come to America and compete for wages in a free job market. I doubt if many American programmers would support that.

    10. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >Unions have mandatory membership for a damn good reason. It used to be that company men could come to your house at night and "persuade" you to voluntarily withdraw from the union.

      Yeah, instead union members come to your house at night and "persuade" you to voluntarily support the union instead. Such a big improvement.

      (Don't believe me? Google "slashed tires" "Detroit" and either "UAW" or "Teamsters'".)

      These pro-union weenies make big promises but just read newspaper archives about what the unions actually do if you want to find out what's really going to happen.

    11. Re:Time for Solidarity? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      I was trying to avoid editorializing too much positively or negatively about unions, because my main thesis was one of simple fact, and opinions tend to distract from that.

      Yes, mandatory membership has a history tied quite deeply with the de facto abuses that management participated in in negotiations.

    12. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do. Indian programmers are polite, Americans are rude. As an American I prefer Indian coworkers.

    13. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Except that some companies seem to be bringing Indian workers to the US with promises of high paying (for India, at least) jobs. When they get here, the jobs mysteriously aren't there and they are put in houses with a bunch of other guys until a job arises. They are told not to leave the house for anything (food is brought to them) and they are kept from returning home. (One guy needed to return home to see his dying father and they denied him this.) The companies might be fined for their actions, but clearly they don't care because they pay the fine and keep on doing what they've been doing.

      I don't care how much "better" the job that these workers may eventually get is, they are human beings and shouldn't be treated like product stock, stuffed in a "storage room" until needed.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    14. Re:Time for Solidarity? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      It's time to organize the world's programmers and make it clear to business that we won't tolerate this treatment any longer. It doesn't matter if we form a union or not as long as we band together to protect our common interests as programmers.

      I'm tempted to say that's a first world view. It's a lofty ideal, and might work if the playing field were more level, but when you're incorporating programmers from third world countries, who are looking forward to a subsistence wage in some craphole, it's hard to tell them to go on strike. These people are looking forward to 70 hour weeks (I've seen this, with H-1B workers locally) at lower-middle-class wages, as something that's *still* one hell of a lot better than they came from.

      I suspect that attempts to organize will be taken as first worlders trying to save their overly-cushy jobs.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    15. Re:Time for Solidarity? by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      That's literally the definition of a union, though.

      I mean, more effective unions have mandatory membership, but a union itself is literally a group of employees in a field banding together to protecting their common interests.

      Yes, I would call that the classic definition of a union. A bit different than the organizations that call themselves unions now.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    16. Re:Time for Solidarity? by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      not being ripped off is the main one

    17. Re: Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      COBRA insurance? Who are you, fuckin' Destro? Go die in a fire.

    18. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have 3 options..

      1 The affordable health plan under the contract employeer. It consists of a plan that limits the plan's maximum payments. Limits include Max of $20 for a perscripiton. Max of 250 for a hospital stay. and the list goes on. If you have ever stayed in a hospital or are diabetic, you will find your maximum out of pocket is the sky is the limit. The plan protects the insurance, not you against any expensive proceedure such as any surgery, MRI, etc.

      2 Cobra, limited in duration.. till you find other insurance. Well over $1500/month for family coverage for a high deductable plan. Maximum out of pocket for the plan, $6000. If you need medical services, your maximum is over 2,000/month. Wife had surgery and cancer treament this year.. This left little expendable or discreciionsary income. The Mortgauge, car insurance, and utilities took the rest. No savings this year.

      3 Open market.. Your competitive market for insurance. Full coverage high deductable retiree plans start at $2800/month. I won't be able to afford that until my house is paid off in about 20 years.

      This leaves me the reality of No coverage in about a year, or quitting work and selling the house to get on Obama Care.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    19. Re:Time for Solidarity? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      In that you have decided you have a political opposition to those groups, thus they can't be similar?

      I'm sorry, that's still what unions are, and your various beefs with them and the legitimacy of those beefs have no bearing on the fact that they are.

    20. Re:Time for Solidarity? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight, for years employees have been suing employers for dismissal claims and raking in plenty of money in those claims, but the moment the tables turn you cry uncle?

      From TFS:

      The rural Georgia staffing firm boasts online of providing tech workers to IBM Corp., Bank of America Corp., Verizon Communications Inc. and other companies. Softech agreed to pay Muthuperiasamy $51,000 a year to continue improving Pennsylvaniaâ(TM)s workersâ(TM) compensation database. Instead, he changed his mind, taking a better-paying job in Ohio.

      When Softech sued him in 2011 for more than $20,000, saying he had agreed to it when he signed his employment contract, Muthuperiasamy was astonished.

      âoeYou should treat people like human beings,â the 32-year-old said, âoenot like animals, creatures that you make money off of.â

      - the guy signs a contract and based on the contract he can get sued and he was sued and the problem is?

      In your mind the only people that are liable to be sued are employers and never employees, businesses and never clients.

      As far as I am concerned, an individual shouldn't lose his rights simply because he starts a business and sells something to somebody.

      As to 'solidarity', the last refuge of a failing economy is 'solidarity', where people divide into groups and start fighting over a shrinking economic pie rather than actually fixing the real problem - removing government from business, removing income related taxes, reinstating real money and forbidding government from creating fiat and fiat based inflation.

    21. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What "common interests" are shared by the world's programmers?

      To not be exploited might be one.

      To not be played against one another by employers abusing the law such as H1Bs could be another.

      In my opinion, the proper "fix" is to eliminate H1Bs and give foreign tech workers visas that are not tied to any employer, so that they can come to America and compete for wages in a free job market. I doubt if many American programmers would support that.

      On the contrary, I believe many American programmers would welcome that. When the employer is no longer tied to the VISA, employers lose the incentive to provide foreign workers the support they currently get.

      When foreign workers have to pay for their stay in America directly themselves, they will likely not be able to compete at the same level as they are now, since they lack the economies of scale their employer backers possess.

      If they still beat American workers then, then there's no excuse.

    22. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Bengie · · Score: 1, Informative

      The "Obama Care" changes that look like prices went up was more of law changes that made predatory "cheap" insurance that didn't actually offer anything, illegal.

      A personal example was my mom's employer was constantly changing insurance companies to "save money". My mom was sometimes paying ever so slightly less, yay, save $20/month, but every time she went into the doctors, she had to fight tooth and nail to get the insurance to pay, during which time she couldn't go back to the hospital because of her outstanding "debt", that her insurance was supposed to cover 100%.

      Her employer kept changing insurances every 1-2 years because the old one would suddenly go out of business. It's these insurance companies that were effectively fraudulent shell companies that got removed from the market. My mom's insurance premium went up with the law change, but now she has a semi-decent insurance company to work with because her employer is forced to only select from government regulated companies. I'm sure there was some collateral damage, but I assume an overall win.

    23. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Unions should never have mandatory membership :/

    24. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could get a good deal on office space for your union headquarters in Detroit.

    25. Re:Time for Solidarity? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      You do not need a union for solidarity. Doctors, lawyers, accountants, and other professions have worthwhile organizations, without unions.

    26. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2800 a month for a high deductibleexchange plan? Ya, no sorry.
      I'm not believing that. Gotta raise the bull flag on that one.

      What state, how many people insured, and how old?

    27. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Bengie · · Score: 1

      WTF kind of crap insurance do you have over there? Here in the midwest, between my employer and employees, insurance is about $1.1k/month for a family. I'm sure the company gets a group discount.

      That is a $3k family deductible, with a $1.5k/individual. A lot of stuff is covered at 100%, some things you have co-pays of $5. They will cover anything, even if your doctor did not recommend it, no maximums of any kind, including lifetime. All out of pocket, including co-pays, count towards the deductible, which once met, no more co-pays, everything is covered 100%.

      Nation wide non-profit insurance that is recognized as one of the most ethical companies in the world.

      I wonder how people even find insurance that it's so crappy and expensive at the same time.

      The will even cover your children indefinitely, so long as they stay in college full time or are in the military, and obviously not married. If there is every a lapse of more than 6 months, they will no longer be eligible.

    28. Re:Time for Solidarity? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      It's time to organize the world's programmers and make it clear to business that we won't tolerate this treatment any longer. It doesn't matter if we form a union or not as long as we band together to protect our common interests as programmers.

      Why I sympathize with your sentiment, as someone with ~30 years experience in this field, I can confidently say that you'd have better luck herding cats. [ We can't even agree as to whether systemd sucks, or sucks a lot. :-) ]

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    29. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As an American I prefer Indian coworkers.

      Do you also like the smell?

      Seriously, nothing racist about it. But their eating habits make them smell.

    30. Re:Time for Solidarity? by jmauro · · Score: 1

      They kind of function like unions anyway. The ABA decides who will be a lawyer and on what terms in order to join the bar of your local state. Same with the doctor licensing boards and the CPA boards for accountants.

      Unlike industrial unions though they've codified their positions in to the laws and as such can be "voluntary association" instead of a mandatory union shop, even though they function just the same.

    31. Re:Time for Solidarity? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Hm. Are you really talking to me, or are you talking to someone with whom you recently had this argument?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    32. Re:Time for Solidarity? by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Of course they are. They are getting a "prevailing wage" that is 10x what they could earn in India.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    33. Re: Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, goody for you!

    34. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for a lobbying group like the EFF. Call it the "IT UNION", make it a web-store, give me a button to purchase "Make H1B Illegal".

      Look, we're a ruthlessly meritocratic bunch when it comes to ourselves and our lives and judging those within our industry, it's come time we hold everyone else we interact with to those same standards. Everyone here is tired of piss in the soup.

      People are selfish, they are motivated for their own benefit. Unions, so long as they don't place undue burdens on businesses (No Pensions, everyone's pay is published, everyone is treated fairly, no hiring your kids for the sake of it, business treats employee's like investors and reports to them regularly e.g. here's why we lost money, here's why we made money, here are our risks, here's our competition), are beneficial, because they enable the workers to resist both investors placing undue burdens on companies (Wall street buying your firm, slashing rates, and generally running the thing into the ground to make a buck: see asset stripping), and they enable people to be motivated. How many companies have you worked at where people just do not care? That's because management is asset stripping them. To the bone.

      What's McDonalds response to $15\hr wages? "Lets innovate". That's exactly what minimum wage does; it forces companies not to treat people like indentured servants and like slaves, and start treating them decently, and that spurs capital formation which spurs more jobs and innovation, a truly meritocratic environment. If there's an excess of general labor and nobody wants to go to school, the need for capital for procreation can be substantial motivating factor in putting forward the effort to attempt to better yourself.

    35. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you using google try 'Flint sit down strike' and 'Homestead_Strike' as well.

    36. Re:Time for Solidarity? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      I'm making some guesses about your motivation for making an inane statement.

    37. Re:Time for Solidarity? by pooh666 · · Score: 1

      Wait, are you saying you think your insurance is good? The above is scary as hell to anyone who lives in a civilized contry.

    38. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about you Google the Pinkerton Detective Agency and look at it's history (since it's still around).

    39. Re:Time for Solidarity? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Guilds aren't unions. I won't enter into the details of the whole discussion between the IWW and the AFL-CIO around the turn of the century, but suffice it to say that you can organize around owning a pet as well. And it's probably worthwile, for some. But unions are about organizing the interests of the workers as they work. Guilds are about protecting your own interests *against* other workers.

      A guild would complain about H1B visa because they are "taking American jobs from American workers". A union would protest against H1B visa because employers are paying them horrible wages under bad conditions, that will eventually become the standard for ALL workers in the industry.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    40. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      Herding cats is easy. I just need a can of tuna. :)

    41. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is you'll get a shitload of posters who claim just how good they have it consulting or whatever without a union, where in reality space they are one phone call away from unemployment. They just don't know it yet.

    42. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really sad reading, makes me think of some 3rd world country :-(

      Compare this to Switzerland: fully private, excellent quality health care. Fully private (obligatory, but you get to choose from ~50 companies, with very different offer) health insurance. ~$700/mo to insure a 2+2 family.

      There are limits, too... except that they are maximum :-), i.e., within a year, you pay up to $some_amount, and then, you're covered up to, infinity, essentially. This creates incentive to avoid going to doctor's for simple cold, but has your back covered in case of some bigger shit happening. You can define $some_amount yourself, and depending on that pay more or less per month.

    43. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Did reality run over your cat when you were five? I know you two haven't been on speaking terms for a while, but this is ridiculous.

    44. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Reverse is true. Even if you aren't a member of a union, you benefit from a union forcing employers to pay more wages and benefits in your industry. But 'Murricans like yourself would prefer to make less money and be more expendable rather than pay fifty bucks a month in dues.

      It's like not wanting to pay taxes for public roads while at the same time enjoying the benefits they provide.

    45. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "This leaves me the reality of No coverage in about a year, or quitting work and selling the house to get on Obama Care."

      if you got downsized you can reapply for obamacare, my household making under 70k/yr got us 100% covered (read: no copays) in california.

      so i'm not sure what you're talking about... i have a coworker who was also wrong about obamacare, he didnt even apply because he listened to all of this right wing talk show crap, turns out he could have had full coverage too but now has to wait because he told them he didnt want it. Poor guy has an austistic kid too and could really use some financial help. oh well. fuck obamacare amirite?

    46. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I do. Indian programmers are polite, Americans are rude. As an American I prefer Indian coworkers."

      I find the exact opposite, many people i talk to express the same sentiment, maybe it's cultural differences in what is considered polite... to me, calling me "my friend my friend" is rude unless i know you personally and we are friends, otherwise it seems like a slick salesman who calls me "chief" and also makes me want to punch him when he says it...

    47. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Unions should never have mandatory membership :/

      They don't, not in the US. What does exist are companies who sign contracts where they agree not to hire non-union employees. That's a business decision that a company makes for itself. No actual conservative would dream of interfering in a business's internal decision making about hiring.

    48. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the old if it isn't perfect it's crap argument.

    49. Re:Time for Solidarity? by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

      if you are lucky enough to get the capped h1b visas, once you get it you can get another employer to petition for another h1b while you are in the country so in that sense it is "transferable". however, the tie is established if the employee wants to get a green card. they have to do it through A (1) employer...which can take years. a decade is not unheard of. if the employees goes to another employer, he/she has to start over.

      --
      --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
    50. Re:Time for Solidarity? by khallow · · Score: 1

      A personal example was my mom's employer was constantly changing insurance companies to "save money". My mom was sometimes paying ever so slightly less, yay, save $20/month, but every time she went into the doctors, she had to fight tooth and nail to get the insurance to pay, during which time she couldn't go back to the hospital because of her outstanding "debt", that her insurance was supposed to cover 100%.

      In other words, the insurance offered plenty, but refused to honor its contract. What has changed about that? It's just as illegal to violate a contract now as it was then.

      It's these insurance companies that were effectively fraudulent shell companies that got removed from the market. My mom's insurance premium went up with the law change, but now she has a semi-decent insurance company to work with because her employer is forced to only select from government regulated companies.

      Again, what has changed? Those past insurance plans were just as "government regulated" as current insurance plans. My belief is that we will find the same games played now as were played then.

    51. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you will find your maximum out of pocket is the sky is the limit.

      Then your employer is screwing you. All non-grandfathered plans (plans that did not exist exactly as they are today back in 2010) have an individual yearly "cost-sharing" (aka out-of-pocket) limit of $6.6K for an individual plan and $12.2K for a family. That is total out of pocket costs, including co-pays, etc, everything except your monthly premium. So once you hit that $6.6K the marginal cost to the patient is $0.

    52. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Private but highly regulated. The limit on personal contributions (for basic coverage) doesn't come from competition, it comes from the Swiss government.

    53. Re:Time for Solidarity? by DarkAce911 · · Score: 1

      There are limits on what you can sign away on an employment contract since they are so one-sided. A 20K fine for leaving employment in an at-will state should be considered very excessive.

    54. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a programmer I would be fine with this as long as we allow the indian doctors to come over and actually compete as well. If my wage was driven down significantly I wouldn't mind as long as healthcare costs were made to follow.

    55. Re:Time for Solidarity? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Look, the US is taking baby steps to be a first-world nation. Let's not be too discouraging. (You think that was scary? Ever look at the US health care situation before the ACA?)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    56. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But 'Murricans like yourself would prefer to make less money and be more expendable rather than pay fifty bucks a month in dues.

      Strawman arguments are lies.

    57. Re:Time for Solidarity? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      When my son was about 4, he kept telling cats where to go. ("Go over there, kitty!") I figured he had an excellent future in IT management.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    58. Re:Time for Solidarity? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Why? There are no limits to filing lawsuits against businesses, I believe there shouldn't be any limits on lawsuites filed against anybody. Why should there be limits? Also there shouldn't be any limits on contract clauses. People must be free to set up contracts in any way.

    59. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of coarse about half of what unions do is intimidate the "Scabs" (people who don't back the union) into toeing the line.

      The basic premis behind a union is "they can't fire us all". But that's only rarely true of the people actively being exploited, so to make it true they have to ensure management can't hire anyone competent to replace the union workers.

    60. Re:Time for Solidarity? by pooh666 · · Score: 1

      I only remember it from the time when people could afford to pay their doctors for the most part.

    61. Re:Time for Solidarity? by strikethree · · Score: 1

      This payment pretty much sucks up all expendable income normally used for living expenses.

      Mission accomplished it would seem.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    62. Re:Time for Solidarity? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sure, but some are called professional societies and other names. For example, the ABA, the AMA, etc.

    63. Re:Time for Solidarity? by sjames · · Score: 1

      You should never fail to train your replacements. For example "We are in a multi year revamp of programming languages. So any updatyes should be coded in brainfuck or MUMPS. If you need to modify a module it will first need a rewite into one of those languages. The company is a little embarrassed by it's old choice, so use this password to erase the history on the module in source control once you have checked the new version in. I'm sure you'll do fine!

    64. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Well, firstly I'm not an American, I'm British and I work in Britain - and I've never had a problem negotiating my own benefits package. And I've worked in plenty of places which had union presence, without forced membership. Funny how it works over here...

      Secondly, I couldn't care less if I benefit from a union "forcing" my employer to pay me more even though I'm not a member - that's the unions problem, not mine. If the union cannot entice me to voluntarily sign up, and instead have to rely on forced membership, then its not worth signing up.

      Its not like your tax analogy at all, because unions are not government entities and cannot levy taxes - I don't want the union to work for me, and I don't want to be a member of that union. They shouldn't be able to force me to pay them any money at all - if they want to be "compensated" for any work they "do" for non-union members, that's between them, their members and the employer, but it should certainly not be between me and an entity I don't want to do business with.

    65. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Actually they do exist - what you suggests exist actually is illegal (closed shops, where companies agree not to hire non-union employees, banned in ). In the US, under the National Labour Relations Act a union can require all employees of a company covered under the mandate of the union to pay dues, either as an active member or as a passive member. And the union can force the employer to fire an employee that has not paid union dues.

      So, mandatory membership. Fuck that.

    66. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, the insurance offered plenty, but refused to honor its contract.

      I think it's more likely the contract allowed the insurance companies to avoid paying as much as possible.

      It sounds like the GP's mom let her employer negotiate contracts for insurance. It's not in their interests to pay out. It wouldn't be surprising if they signed a contract that, while completely legal, helps themselves more than it helps the GP's mom and other employees.

      The lesson here is be careful who you allow to represent you in contract talks.

      If the issue is widespread, the GP's mom and other employees should stand up for themselves and negotiate something better from their employer. Maybe even do it collectively so they have more bargaining power. But I suppose in America, anything that might inconvenience an employer sounds too much like socialism so I don't expect them to do it

    67. Re:Time for Solidarity? by khallow · · Score: 1

      I think it's more likely the contract allowed the insurance companies to avoid paying as much as possible.

      Except that the poster indicated the insurance company eventually paid out. Again, this is a game they can play right now. It's still not in the interest of the insurance company to pay out.

    68. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Relative to the USA, yes. Assuming we want to drive the 30 minutes to get there, we have access to several of the top 10 hospitals in the world for their fields and are leaders in research for fields like stems calls, cancer, neurosurgery, reconstructive surgery, you name it.

      My covered yearly check up with my doctor takes about 1.5 hours from the time he sees me. We go over everything. A lot of those more social healthcare countries have 10-15 minute face-to-face time with their doctors.

      I'm sure there is a happy medium to be found.

    69. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the poster indicated the insurance company eventually paid out.

      That they eventually did pay doesn't make the fact that they tried to avoid paying for as long as possible go away. They very well may have gotten away with paying anything if the other poster's mom gave up half way through.

      Again, this is a game they can play right now. It's still not in the interest of the insurance company to pay out.

      I don't and didn't disagree with that. I was disagreeing on whether delaying or refusing payment means they weren't honoring contracts. I think it's likely they wrote the contracts in such a way that allows them to delay. Even if they eventually had to pay, delaying has the benefit of letting them keep money in their accounts for longer, gaining interest, paying for other more pressing things first, etc.

    70. Re:Time for Solidarity? by khallow · · Score: 1

      I was disagreeing on whether delaying or refusing payment means they weren't honoring contracts.

      Ok, so you disagree, It's still a breech of contract to systematically use terms of the contract to delay or avoid honoring terms of the contract. Proving it in court is a different matter and I gather that is just as hard to do today as it has ever been.

    71. Re:Time for Solidarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found the exact opposite. Indians are incredibly arrogant and rude. Well, unless you're their superior, in which case they'll treat you like gold.

  3. Most Transparent Administration Ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just like Sandy Berger going into to the archives to clean up some incriminating evidence against Hillary, Obama wants to eliminate any information concerning the H1B visa abuses. Look at who his biggest contributors are and it becomes crystal clear why he is doing this. Doesn't want some "Big Data" expert going through the records and coming to the same conclusions as the referenced article does.

  4. But, but, teh STEM talents!!! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    These poor 3rd-worlders have unique talents that could never be found locally, don'tcha know!?!?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:But, but, teh STEM talents!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They do. The talent is accepting slave wages.

    2. Re:But, but, teh STEM talents!!! by TheMeuge · · Score: 1, Insightful

      These poor 3rd-worlders have unique talents that could never be found locally, don'tcha know!?!?

      You mean someone who spent 7 years getting a PhD being abused and working 6-7 day 80+ hour weeks, then working as a post-doc with no hope of ever being faculty, at 60+ hour weeks and being paid $40k or less until their retirement without any benefits?

      It's a talent all right.

    3. Re:But, but, teh STEM talents!!! by TacoBellGrande · · Score: 3, Informative

      What are you smoking?

      The companies listed Apple, Cisco, Verizon pay wages most of America could only dream of -- especially since they typically require only a 4 year degree. According to GlassDoor:

      Apple's entry-level Software Engineer title makes an average base pay of $119,268, plus $34kish in additional incentives.
      Cisco's "Software Engineer" title has an average salary of $117,326 with about $20k in additional incentives.
      Verizon's "Software Engineer" title has any average salary of $100,098. Only one person reported bonus, at $14k. I'm not sure if, like the above companies, bonuses & stock are all but a given.

      Since H1Bs are, by law, required to be paid the same salaries as their American citizen counterparts, if anything, the travesty is that we're giving the nation's best-paying jobs to people from overseas. But having hired numerous engineers, I can say that it'd be difficult to staff a large tech company of any size without relying on a foreign labor pool.

      There's certainly abuses of the H1B program, but they're mostly from the big Indian "work for hire" shops like L&T, Infosys, etc. They pay way below industry norms, and thus, paying domestic workers the same wage as your foreign workers isn't that big of a deal.

    4. Re:But, but, teh STEM talents!!! by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of H-1Bs are from India, followed by China at a fraction of the number. Should the U.S. be in the position of fixing India's problem with poor workers? If this was truly about getting highly talented workers that are not available in the U.S. these numbers wouldn't be so skewed toward a single country.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:But, but, teh STEM talents!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Glassdoor relies on self-reported salaries and wages.

    6. Re:But, but, teh STEM talents!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in high cost of living areas

    7. Re:But, but, teh STEM talents!!! by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      What are you smoking?

      Apple's entry-level Software Engineer title makes an average base pay of $119,268, plus $34kish in additional incentives.

      And you could cut that in half and it would still seem to be a vast sum to supporting a family on $30,000 a year as an auto mechanic. This defense of companies that have more money than God is bizarre, and a complete non-response to the issues of wage suppression the business talk of "free markets" going out the window the second they benefit the working class.

      The companies listed Apple, Cisco, Verizon pay wages most of America could only dream of

      And in the 30's, baseball players 'had jobs most America could only dream of'. Does nothing to change the fact that they were paid far less than they were worth due to anti-competitive practices from team owners.

      Since H1Bs are, by law, required to be paid the same salaries as their American citizen counterparts, if anything

      Increasing the size of the labor pool = reduced "prevailing wages". It matters not a whit that the Indian programmer is getting $40k a year, same as his American counterpart in the next cube, if the American's wage would be $48k a year without H1B labor.

    8. Re:But, but, teh STEM talents!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Glassdoor relies on self-reported salaries and wages."

      In other news, water is wet and sand tastes terrible.

    9. Re:But, but, teh STEM talents!!! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling I'm likely better off with my considerably lower salary in a Midwest state far from Silicon Valley.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. "In a possibly unrelated move..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks... I needed a good laugh. :-/

  6. Try them for slavery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Across the board to members of government if needed.

    But of course this won't happen because the economic incentives are just too perverse, so the question then becomes exactly what is the government protecting us from?

    1. Re:Try them for slavery by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Punishing billionaires and mulitinational corporations? You got a better chance of Pat Robertson officiating gay weddings.

      so the question then becomes exactly what is the government protecting us from?

      High-paying jobs?

    2. Re:Try them for slavery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But, but, this is the worst aspects of the robber barons transplanted to the 21 century, and much like the time of yore, I'm hard pressed to see how this is possible without the collusion of government. If we only had a stronger government to enforce the law, these abuses wouldn't happen.

      It's a pity that these conditions don't happen exclusively to women, or that there wasn't a little sexual intrigue to go along with it. Then you could have a worldwide condemnation of it, with useful idiot celebrities drawing attention to it as proof that women are oppressed. Hell, the only concern it seems here is that these slags are driving down wages.

      But as it is, if you are dropping from exhaustion doing permanent temp work in a warehouse or an Indian programmer, you are at best a statistic of how cruel the mechanization of business really are, never mind the man behind the curtain.

    3. Re:Try them for slavery by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      The foxes long ago took over the hen house. Big corporations and the rich pays headline grabbing fines (Big Round Number!!!), but these are usually easily paid from the company slush fund. No individuals go to prison for this crap anymore.

      Part of the trouble is the Holder doctrine, which tries not to punish shareholders for the bad acts of a few executives (who happen to be shielded from liability themselves as well) by not imposing fines or punishments that would materially harm a company. I will be glad when Eric Holder is gone from the political scene.

      My suspicion is that it is mostly too late. Our political and economic system has entered a death spiral and we will be another has-been empire similar to the British, Roman, Greek, etc. It will take many decades, but decline looks pretty inevitable now that political outrage is easily classified as a terrorist act, secret prisons are a defacto standard, and so much more.

  7. seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The best thing to do is replace the H-1B visas that are tied to a specific employer and make them a general limited time employment visa.
    If the employers say there's a specific need for more workers in a field then the govt can grant a few more of the new visas to those wishing to travel to the US.
    This would mean employers would be have to pay the going wage to the newcomers, albeit with the downward pressures on pay that would come from an increased worker pool.
    I could be crazy tho.

    NOTE: All of the above is the view of a simple rustic Northern Irishman with no desire to move to the US. Well, mebbe somewhere with snowboarding. Seriously, I live farther north than Vancouver for fuck sake, but all winter is just rain and wind. An no. I'm not going to Scotland. Our whiskey is better. If i wanted to drink bog water i'd just drink bog water.

    1. Re:seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about H1B wage =
          2x U.S. wage for the same job? Supply and demand should work for workers too.

    2. Re:seems to me by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      H1B tax.

      You should pay a tax on top of the H1B employees wages that makes the full package 20% more costly than employing a US worker.

    3. Re:seems to me by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You should pay a tax on top of the H1B employees wages that makes the full package 20% more costly than employing a US worker.

      But if the wage suppression resulting from H1B results in a 30% reduction in the prevailing wage, it's still worth it for them. It's like the banks that get fined a few hundred million for practices that made them billions in profits - they actually have an incentive to go on abusing the system.

    4. Re:seems to me by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      The best thing to do is replace the H-1B visas that are tied to a specific employer and make them a general limited time employment visa.

      That would mean that H-1B workers would have to be sustained with unemployment benefits and other benefits during the periods they'd transition from job to job. However, in the US there are many people that want to punish immigrants, and their judgements are too clouded to accept a sensible compromise even if it could lead to better wages and better protection for all workers.

      You combine this with the fact that all major corporations and corporate lobbyists would be dead set against such a law, and you have a non-starter.

  8. My Great Grandparents were Indentured Servants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Finally someone else is making this obvious analogy, but in one way H1-B is worse. Two of my great grandparents came to Canada as indentured servants. My great grandparents got married and fled their servitude into what was then the wilds of western Canada where as long as you could work or scratch some dirt for food and kill a little wild for extra you got along. Most of all no one was going to look for you and ship you back because there was no one to DO the work so a body was appreciated in a way, even one that wasn't a slave.

    That last word being the key point. They don't want employees, they want slaves. If the free market was driving this to attract the best they would be offering all H1-Bs a premium salary and premium working conditions above local talent which would drive up wages and then supply ... guessing that is not the case.

  9. Abuses on all sides by tompaulco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are abuses on all sides of this program. Just end it. The tech worker shortage is a lie. This is no longer about cherry picking the best and brightest scientific minds. It has become a system of replacing local workers with lower cost indentured servants.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Abuses on all sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are very powerful people with a vested interest in not ending this program, and especially not "fixing" these elements of it (which in their opinion are features, not bugs, of the program). So, it is going to take a lot more than a posting on slashdot to get this ended.

    2. Re:Abuses on all sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Short list of some lies we are supposed to believe.
      1. Easter Bunny
      2. Santa
      3. The check in the mail
      4. Don't worry we got your back
      5. Trust me, it's good car
      6. A Tech shortage

      There is no tech shortage, none, it's a lie.
      It will stop only when we refuse to re-elect those back-stabbing government people who accept piles of money from lobbyists.

       

    3. Re:Abuses on all sides by Bengie · · Score: 0

      With a sub 1% unemployment rate in my portion of the tech sector, it's hard to find employees to fill much needed spots. But with a multi-year learning curve to start being a net-profit for the company, we aim to hire people who have local roots and have a vested interest to stay with the company long-term. And because of our aim for long term employees, we mostly get treated well.

      We've been mostly a local company, but we're starting to get more remote workers from around the nation, but face-to-face is still preferred, you learn a lot of information on how to do your job via overhearing people discussing stuff or random chit-chat that strikes up as someone passes your cubical.

    4. Re:Abuses on all sides by pooh666 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, you are a chump and your costs are insane for that rnd overheard conversation. Focus makes deadlines. People who ask questions get A's. People who don't you fire.

    5. Re:Abuses on all sides by Bengie · · Score: 1

      By the time you ask questions, it's already too late. We handle a lot of integration of many data systems where the systems are in constant flux. We need to integrated with thousands of customers and need to be fully aware of all of the edge cases and interactions of all of these systems.

      In order to do our work you must
      Full understand from top to bottom how our system works
      Full understand from top to bottom how nearly every other department systems work
      Full understand from top to bottom how each customers system works
      Full understand from top to bottom how All of these systems interact
      Full understand understand the ramifications of your decisions
      Be able to explain all of this to other people in the company
      Be able to work with the customers to help them with their systems
      Be able to create a list of pro and cons for certain decisions

      I work in a very unique market of integrating with constantly moving targets. And the only standard is there is no standard. Ditto for rules. You just need to roll with the punches and be very nimble and think outside the box. One of the things that makes our department "special" is we are really good at identifying potential issues well before the design phase. Describe the problem you're facing, we'll ask questions, and we do a decent job telling you what to watch out for. Most of this is only ever learned via experience. This is not something to be taught in a book.

      Even companies like Microsoft and Google have come to us asking for advice on how to handle these situations. It sounds like they may be outsourcing to us for our expertise in consulting on these issues.

      We've been making in-roads with some very large data warehouse vendors for analytics, and they've been starting to come to us for help in these situations. We're making strong professional relationships. Turn-over of employees is expensive. We like to keep our people.

  10. Perplexing? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

    "There was no explanation for the change, and it is perplexing to researchers," reports Computerworld.

    What kind of stupid researchers are these? Regulatory capture, corporate welfare, and political corruption are plenty sufficient to explain the changes.

    Only a knave looking for social justice in every action by a bureaucrat should be surprised, but he should be working at a daycare facility, not as a university researcher.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Perplexing? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      It's a euphemism. The researchers have to pretend to give the administration the benefit of the doubt (i.e., by assuming they don't understand the reason rather than publicly stating that the reason is clearly to hide improprieties) or else they'll suddenly have to start filing FOIA requests for every damn piece of data they need (with the response redacted in its entirety, if the Administration even bothers to respond).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  11. the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Companies like Verizon, Cisco, HP, and Walmart contract employment because direct-hire is nearly impossible. These companies insist you work in armpits like Bentonville Arkansas or Decalb Georgia so your salary can be shuffled down the chain to 40 grand a year not under the implication that your services are worthless, but under the assertion that the "cost of living" is so inexpensive you shouldnt need a respectable wage. American workers caught on to this shifty crap pretty quickly and now in the race to pedal labor in general into the earth, contract companies are picking up the slack. Cognizent and Infosys are two companies that actively avoid american labour capable of contesting wage theft and frivolous litigation in court. They avoid it by specifying explicitly the requirement for an H1B in order to incense foreign workers to apply. If you receive a call as an american, its generally from a roaring indian callcenter with poor diction and once your salary comes up, the call ends.

    H1B is the new slave-ship, and because corporations control the general direction of american government, it isnt likely the H1B process will get any more reasonable.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by clintp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Slightly offtopic...

      These companies insist you work in armpits like Bentonville Arkansas or Decalb Georgia so your salary can be shuffled down the chain to 40 grand a year not under the implication that your services are worthless, but under the assertion that the "cost of living" is so inexpensive you shouldnt need a respectable wage.

      As a midwesterner, I'd like to tell you firmly to go fuck yourself ... but also I'm far too polite to do that.

      Instead maybe realize that wage costs are only part of having your business in the "armpits" -- and a pretty small one at that. Real estate, utilities, shipping, taxes, buildout costs, and a lot of other factors make flyover states a financially beneficial place to locate a business. With tech jobs there's no geographical need to pick a particular location other than space, power and bandwidth -- and those can be bought. Why not go cheap?

      --
      Get off my lawn.
    2. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Keeping their home offices in those locations is really part of the same game as the H1B exploit.

      If they can get someone to move there and work for 20% less than the say the US average market rate based on the cost of living theory they know you can't leave.

      You will by a house, which you will never be able to sell for enough to cover the majority cost of a similar property any place likely to offer similar employment roles. You won't having savings to make up the difference either because even if your wages went a long way there in terms of the price of local services and housing; they won't elsewhere.

      So you will be left there in Bentonville after a 5 years or so going gee, I really can't afford to be 40 years old, exhaust my savings on a down payment and still have only 30% equity in a new home; no matter how good the new job might be.

      I am pretty sure some of these companies plan this!

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    3. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... their home offices ....

      If the job can telecommute, it can outsource. One could always subcontract to whereverland ;-)

    4. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by t0rkm3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmmm... from my salary, which is about 15% off of what the average InfoSec guy with 20yrs of great experience can draw in the Bay area. I wonder at your supposition. In fact, I may spend the day wandering around my 75acres of well wooded land, or perhaps I'll ponder while I watch the soybean farmer that leases the other 75 acres is doing, or perhaps while I wander about my 4600 sqft home...

      I lived in SoCal for 10 yrs. My wife is from the West Coast. I make a good living, and live a good life. Every now and then I get a nice offer from some west coast or other company to move and take up the urban life style. We consider it, and then pass. You can't trade knowing the people in your farmer's market by name, having conversations with the local coffee shop about roasting methods over a cigar and whiskey, all while enjoying an evening in which the background noise lacks cars but more than makes up for it with owls, crickets, cicadas, whipoorwills, doves, and all manner of other creatures.

      When we want to go to the city... We drive and stay a week, or a weekend. We figure that the money we save on the home (my payments on a 30 yr note on the above property are just above 1100/mo insurance and tax included) and the time on the commute can be used on mini-vacations to the city.

      There are things that we miss (an excellent dance school) but not a lot. We have a tutor that teaches my children Mandarin, and piano. They swim at the Y a few times a week, play indoor soccer on weekends. My wife acts in the local theatre companies (one of which is one of the longest continuously running theatre companies in the country). I can still go to the local gaming store and hang out with comic book nerds...

      So... If you're pissed about the wage depression, you should probably look at a different profession, or another circumstance. From here, in Cali or any where else, I've never had a problem getting a good wage for the job that I do, nor have I had a problem getting offers for a damn good wage to live in the Bay, or Denver, or San Diego.

      All of the above aside... The H1-B program is designed for abuse. It was designed by politicians. It falls under the same type of shit that had all computer workers classified as management/professionals to prevent hourly pay and/or overtime. The above was to point out that if you look somewhere other than the Bay, you can still build new stuff, and have a much better life. The Bay area is a technological sweatshop. Leave. When you leave, take your skills and desire to build with you. Make some other place in the country a great place to innovate. Austin is great, and not a terrible city (esp compared to the West Coast), Houston isn't bad either, lots of great places to live. When you build your customer base, move to a smaller town and enjoy your life, you only get one shot.

    5. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I have noticed several high-end Drupal web-developer jobs at Thomson Reuters are no longer in New York and are offered now in Eagan Minnesota. Thank you for your insightful clarification, because you seem to have offered the only explanation why anyone would move there and take the corresponding pay cut required for employment.

    6. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That wasn't his point. Some companies will locate in dangerous drug-infested ghettos to cut costs. But when you get there you realize that you really need to move to the more expensive area anyway, AND suffer a long commute and low salary. "Low cost of living" doesn't always work like you think it should.

    7. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Which tech company is this that's based in DeKalb [County, I assume] Georgia?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re: the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Because those places are armpits and normal Americans used to the relatively luxury of our two beautiful coasts don't want to work in flyover locations

    9. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by hemp · · Score: 1

      I bet he is talking about Cox Communications.

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    10. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      "With tech jobs there's no geographical need to pick a particular location other than space, power and bandwidth -- and those can be bought. Why not go cheap?"

      Availability of employees is a HUGE cost/risk in locating is an armpit state, or even armpit region of one of the coastal states. Locating in the Bay Area lets you pull local programming talent mostly at will. Pay a high enough salary and you can get a wide range of software talent as needed. Locate yourself in North Dakota and recruiting at almost any price is a near impossibility despite the low cost of living. Employees won't want to up-end their family , and if you go bust there is likely almost no backup plan. So while there is no specific geographical reason, there are very strong economic reasons to put your new company where prices are already high.

      It is counter-intuitive for sure, but it is well understood thing, it is the same reason to locate a diamond shop in the existing diamond district rather than across town where you would think there is less competition.

      I work for a German company is the USA because they simply have exhausted the local talent pool for ASIC designers, and it is far easier to buy up talent in our area than to organically grow it at home. Lack of expansion was viewed as a bigger risk than the risks of managing a US group from thousands of miles away, cost was pretty far down on the list of issues.

    11. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a tutor that teaches my children Mandarin, and piano.

      you misspelled 'mandolin' LoL

    12. Re: the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the midwest is an "armpit" then the coasts (especially the eastern one) must be a shit-stained asshole. I've never seen such a terrible, unhappy, ugly, run-down place as New York City. The worst ghettos of any midwestern city (yes, even Detroit) are roughly as well maintained as a moderately "upscale" neighborhood in that urban scar on the landscape known as New York City.

      So fuck the coasts and their "luxury" and their "beauty" because it isn't either one of those things.

    13. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have taken a job in Louisville, KY had they paid anywhere close to what I can get in the bay area. But the software jobs advertised there pay $70k. I'm earning around $250k in the Bay Area and saving over $50k a year for retirement. If I could find a job that paid 85% of what I earn now in a cheaper part of the country, I would jump at the offer.

    14. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      They're in Fulton, not DeKalb (in the middle of the absolute most expensive part of Atlanta). The affordable parts of DeKalb are a 30 min - 1 hour commute (in each direction) away.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    15. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      If you're doing fine... Then keep on doing. One thing to consider into your calculations if you have the opportunity again. The last company I worked for paid a pension at 8% of salary per year into a cash balance account that vests at 2 yrs of service. In addition, they allowed up to 3% of your salary to be put aside into stock, payable on a multiple based on earnings for the quarter. On 100K (before I negotiated some bitchin' pay raises) I put an average of 15K per year into retirement on a simple 3K investment.

      That was aside from standard 401K matching and stock purchase plans and up to 15% annual bonus (which went straight to retirement and college funds)

      The benefits above or competition to those benefits are pretty standard in this part of the country.

      We don't get the buses, lunches, good coffee, or free soda. What we do get is worth a lot more in the long run.

    16. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming your investments match inflation (which I think is a realistic assumption instead of assuming 10%) and that you work 40 years and are retired for 20, a $15k/year savings rate will give a retirement income of $30k/year. Add social security and you end up with $48k. That sounds like a tough retirement to me.

      I'd love a pension, but I've seen too often that it plays out with the company raiding the pension fund and then going bankrupt. I don't trust them and I don't trust the assumptions of high earning rates that allow them to be underfunded.

      I've liven in Austin and loved it. I've also lived in Seattle (and didn't care much for it). The only reason I'm in the Bay is because the financial offer was good enough to move here. But I don't plan to be here for retirement and I'm kind of sad that I'm not putting down roots for the rest of my life.

      I'm probably saving more than I said. Those saving are after my retirement account.

    17. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      A very well written non-response to the issue of wage suppression. As if everyone is free to pull up stakes and move, and there will be a nice six figure job waiting for you at the end of said move. And, if you've spent time in the Bay area, maybe you've heard of how rents have more than trippled in the last few years?

      The H1-B program is designed for abuse. It was designed by politicians.

      H1-B was designed to expand the labor pool and thus lower costs for corporations, while the working stiff still has to compete with third world labor.

    18. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Have you considered what you're lacking is culture? What's the ratio between churches and museums? Not good, I'll bet!

      You live in flyover country. It's an intolerant place where people hate other people because they don't look like them. Let me guess - you're white. That's why you feel comfortable in this hostile environment. Why don't you ask your kid's Chinese teacher what she feels like, enduring constant sexual harassment and racism in your town?

      Oh, you won't be doing that, because it will shatter your ridiculous right-wing political views. Face it, your kind is going down. Another 20 years of immigration in Americaland and your kind will be in the minority, and you CAN'T FREAKING STAND the fact. Music to the world's ears.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    19. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Slightly offtopic...

      These companies insist you work in armpits like Bentonville Arkansas or Decalb Georgia so your salary can be shuffled down the chain to 40 grand a year not under the implication that your services are worthless, but under the assertion that the "cost of living" is so inexpensive you shouldnt need a respectable wage.

      As a midwesterner, I'd like to tell you firmly to go fuck yourself ... but also I'm far too polite to do that.

      Instead maybe realize that wage costs are only part of having your business in the "armpits" -- and a pretty small one at that. Real estate, utilities, shipping, taxes, buildout costs, and a lot of other factors make flyover states a financially beneficial place to locate a business. With tech jobs there's no geographical need to pick a particular location other than space, power and bandwidth -- and those can be bought. Why not go cheap?

      There are people who would want to live in such places, and there are people who would rather not. My company has 3 offices, head office/repair facility in rural Missouri, manufacturing facility in Houston, and a sattelite office in the country of Colombia. There was no way they could entice me to live in rural Missouri, but they were flexible enough to allow me to work in Houston. They got the person they wanted for the job, and I got a job.

      There are lots of companies, though, who are not flexible. Stipulating that employees must live in a place they don't want to artificially limits their pool of potential labor. It also fosters resentment among employees who don't want to live there but really need a job. Companies are shooting themselves in the foot in the name of saving a few bucks. My company has millions of dollars of equipment including welding, machining, rigging, tooling, trucks to move the equipment around, etc. Yet most of the value of the company walks out the door every night. Our differentiator is in the quality of our people, and we attract quality people because we give them a lot of rope and look out for their needs.

      With tech jobs there's no geographical need to pick a particular location other than space, power, bandwidth, and the happiness and loyalty of your workforce.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    20. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If you receive a call as an american, its generally from a roaring indian callcenter with poor diction and once your salary comes up, the call ends.

      Do you mean an interview call? Why would that come from a call center? Makes no sense.
      What does diction have anything do with intelligence? You yourself are a nice example of that. You likely have good diction, but are of low intelligence obviously.

    21. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by emohawk · · Score: 1

      You forgot investment return and compounding, 15/yr could easily grow to 4.2 million over 40 years.

    22. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow. Racism, prejudiced generalizations, and intolerance all rolled into one post. You sure seem to have a lot of hatred for a huge part of the country based on nothing but how you imagine those people to be.

      It must be wonderful to live around so many tolerant, open-minded, and kind people such as yourself.

    23. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      actually your wrong base your self in suburbia and you get run off the mill workers I know of one global 500 company where my boss said that to me and that company had we had multiple multi million pound projects go tits up because they had to many low skilled it people working out in the sticks.

    24. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      As a midwesterner, I'd like to tell you firmly to go fuck yourself ... but also I'm far too polite to do that.

      Well, At least the first part of the statement to be true - scratch a midwesterner and you'll usually find one angry passive-aggressive son of a bitch, as you demonstrate. And I speak from self-knowledge, having grown up in a town of 750 people in the midwest and being, on occasion, an angry, passive aggressive SoB myself.

      But yeah, having lived on the coast and in the midwest, it's an armpit - but just a different brand of armpit, to be fair - no one should feel a special superiority due to where they happen to be living at the time. But I still sincerely doubt that anyone aspires to living in Bentonville, unless they're a Walton and own the town (and even then I'd like to see stats as to how often they actually are there - it's more like a Bentonville-land that they try to keep from becoming a complete hell hole so they can show how much they "do for the community").

      On the plus side of living on the coasts, I actually did learn to tell people to go fuck themselves - you might try that someday. It might help you have less of that passive aggressiveness and help you channel your anger for productive use. Most of midwestern "culture" comes from having to live in too small towns where citizens' only entertainment is gossipping about/trashing the other citizens behind their backs while smiling to their faces. It's pretty clear that the whole passive-aggressive thing is a social balm to prevent mass homicide.

      --
      That is all.
    25. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I'd love a pension, but I've seen too often that it plays out with the company raiding the pension fund and then going bankrupt.

      The pension system is broken. Flat-out broken by design.
      Always always assume that the pension money will not be there when you retire, and you have enough saved up through other means to live comfortably. If you can't... you might want to consider another line of work. Preferably to a job or profession that doesn't feature pensions.

    26. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      As a Midwesterner, there are better and worse places to live. The Twin Cities area is a pretty good one (if you don't mind the cold). There are others. There's also areas I wouldn't want to work in, and would do my best to escape if I did. Personally, I like my life here, and recognize that other people may have other priorities (like staying warm outdoors in January).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    27. Re: the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tried to fight stupid with stupid, and you lost.

    28. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Ever been to a large Midwestern metropolitan area (large by Midwestern standards, anyway)? It won't have the Metropolitan Opera, but it will have museums and theaters and such.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    29. Re:the bottom dregs for the cloistered elite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Billy, give your dad his /. account back and go make your own once you've grown big enough to type the English language properly.

  12. Ive done this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    still worth it. Making 55k in New Jersey, sharing a place with 3 roommates, we have much better life than at home. Two of us found new sponsored green card jobs in last three years. I hope to be next. Our neighbors don't have work visas, they work to install toilets and things and also would rather be here than home.
    Office jobs are not hard and this small price to pay to live in USA.

    1. Re:Ive done this by CimmerianX · · Score: 2

      Congrats to you.... I really mean it. But beware, because large companies no longer have any loyalty to their employees. If you can be replaced with a new visa recipient at a lower wage, you will be.

    2. Re: Ive done this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations.

    3. Re:Ive done this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You making 55K is costing others - and your self a fair wage. I would expect that your "55K" job should be at least 75K and perhaps more.

    4. Re:Ive done this by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      I don't know where home is for you, but when considering the general state of most of the world it would seem that even though you clearly are better off now, and most likely you bring experience and funds back to your home country, an issue does remain.

      There exists a real sense of morality, an instinct for solidarity, and foremost a sense of equality among people who are naturally different from each other. Large parts of Western society are wealthy enough to dabble in such philanthropy, and that is probably a good thing. However, philanthropist of any economic background become conflicted when we observe that our unfair treatement is better than what you are accustomed to anyway. It highlights the inequality which is delieated by national borders.

      Perhaps the hope that remains is that even though you came for the money, some of the good parts of the culture rubbed off on you. Finding the good parts of Western culture is a tall order in the corporate world though.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    5. Re:Ive done this by CaptSlaq · · Score: 1

      I don't know where home is for you, but when considering the general state of most of the world it would seem that even though you clearly are better off now, and most likely you bring experience and funds back to your home country, an issue does remain.

      There exists a real sense of morality, an instinct for solidarity, and foremost a sense of equality among people who are naturally different from each other. Large parts of Western society are wealthy enough to dabble in such philanthropy, and that is probably a good thing. However, philanthropist of any economic background become conflicted when we observe that our unfair treatement is better than what you are accustomed to anyway. It highlights the inequality which is delieated by national borders.

      Perhaps the hope that remains is that even though you came for the money, some of the good parts of the culture rubbed off on you. Finding the good parts of Western culture is a tall order in the corporate world though.

      What, pray tell, do you consider the "good parts" of Western culture? Since it appears that is the shorter list than the "bad parts".

    6. Re:Ive done this by Bengie · · Score: 1

      It is beneficial to the country as a whole to gain valuable talent. The more smart people who work in the USA, the fewer there are to work else where. That makes us more competitive in the long run. The notion of encouraging people to work in your country is a good one, just don't go around hiring everyone, just those who add value.

      Money is only as valuable as the work that can be purchased with it. The more talented people who work in the USA, the more valuable the money is as a whole, assuming we have enough job positions to make use of them, which we seem to.

    7. Re:Ive done this by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not.

      Maybe that $75k/yr worker is overpaid instead.

    8. Re:Ive done this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're overpaid and you've not even mentioned what your profession is!

  13. Supply and Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is going to happen in all fields going forward, because we live in a global economy now. You aren't competing with just other Americans, you're competing with everyone, everywhere. If someone in the world can do your job and do it for less, they'll take your job. Save your pennies.

    1. Re:Supply and Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except teacher, cops, pharmacists, outsourcing companies, those with contacts in fed and state gov, permits, licenses.

      We need licensing to become a protected class.

  14. Obama needs to be impeached and imprisoned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    He's doing everything wrong (so have the last X presidents, so I'm not just picking on Obama).

    The H1-B visa program is a complete detriment to America's job market, and does NOTHING to improve American's lives. It doesn't even improve the corporate bottom feeders using them as they have to keep hiring more and more of these unskilled brainless zombies to do the work of one competent American, of which there are plenty.

    Obamacare under private corporate control is a fiasco raising profits to insurance companies to all time highs, while cheating more Americans out of hard earned money.

    Obama's "open government" is the most secret, most law breaking in decades if not the entire history of our nation, with all of the illegal and unconstitutional spying, data collection, money thievery, secret arrests, secret courts, secret police, secret laws, all of which are illegal and unconstitutional.

    I dare say he's committed multiple acts of treason against our nation during a time of war. Lookup the punishment for treason during a time of war...
    THe heads of the NSA, CIA and FBI are also guilty of the same acts of treason and should get the same punishment.

  15. Obama, Why wait ? by TTL0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "President Obama, by the way, is expected to use his executive authority to expand the H-1B program after the midterm elections."

    I don't get it. If it's a good thing, do it now. If it's a bad thing then why do it later or at all ?!?!?

    Filing this under hope and change

    --
    Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
    1. Re:Obama, Why wait ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing for the people potentially giving money.
      It's a bad thing for the people potentially giving votes.

      The people voting people have a shorter attention span, so you get the best outcome by appeasing the voters now and promising to appease he donators later.

    2. Re:Obama, Why wait ? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. If it's a good thing, do it now. If it's a bad thing then why do it later or at all ?!?!?

      Because he thinks it's a good thing, but he doesn't know how to convince the rest of us that it's a good thing. That's about it.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  16. happens anywhere... by MindPrison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...even in Denmark.

    Believe it or not, this isn't much different than some desperate Russian woman seeking a future "husband" in a country with democratic freedom of some sorts, what they don't know - is that everything isn't milk and honey where they come to, they're still going to be second class citizens of the country they "escape" to.

    Skilled workers dream of a permanent visa after slaving over minimum wages for 5 years in the U.S. And they pretty much have to accept the conditions, because they know...if they screw up after 3.9 years under slavery, all their efforts would have been wasted, and they have to return home. Don't like the job? No problem...there's 10+ million Asians just waiting to take your job mister so get in line or get lost is pretty much the response they'd get.

    You'd believe it would be better in other countries, say...like the richest countries in the world...Scandinavia, but no. I have met a bus-driver that is a surgeon, an hardware engineer from Iraq that has to work at a friends convenience store to avoid being sent home. Several people that collects bottles in our cities, are former health care workers, well educated people, librarians, scientists and many more professional occupations they "escaped" from at home where their beliefs and freedom where suppressed, hoping to find a better life over here.
    But all we do, is to complain about them taking our jobs (yeah, the jobs WE DON'T WANT TO DO...), and treat them like dirt.

    The whole system has to change. We must modernize this world for the 21 century, we can't keep wasting our resources like that.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:happens anywhere... by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      "yeah, the jobs WE DON'T WANT TO DO..."

      How does this relate to H1B's? There are plenty of people in the U.S. that WANT to work in the information technology field. The examples you gave don't make sense either....I'm pretty sure your friends convenience store and the bus company don't sponsor H1B's.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    2. Re:happens anywhere... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of people in the U.S. that WANT to work in the information technology field.

      At minimum wages?

      With a long expensive education behind you, being paid outrageously low wages doesn't cut it. But someone imported on a H1B visa is cheap, see this as an opportunity to work and live in the U.S, especially to get that permanent visa...which they can only apply for AFTER the 5 years with an H1B visa.

      As for my friend, he too was an sponsored import BEFORE he ended up working for the convenience store, he just chose not to accept the work conditions where he worked.

      I opted out too, I preferred poverty to being someones bitch.

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    3. Re:happens anywhere... by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand....if someone is here on an H1B sponsorship and leave employment for somewhere that doesn't sponsor, aren't they here illegally? Or in the examples you gave did these people already obtain a green card/citizenship?

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    4. Re:happens anywhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people don't need a green card because they live in Scandinavia, and can reside there legally as long as they're employed. The point was that even more socialist welfare countries exploit foreign workers the same way the US does.

  17. Exist to lower cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The H1-B Visa program exist to increase the supply of programmers so that the wages of programmers can be kept low and programmer can be mis-treated.

  18. my company lowered wages and all they get are h1bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The company I work for has lowered wages for high tech workers. They only hire in St. Louis which is a relatively low wage area and not a big high tech hub. They have cut wages so much that they are offering they can only get h1bs to take the work. The are not sponsoring for greencards. So anyone who takes the job is trapped. They hired one guy who is very good. He makes about 1/3 less than I do. In a free market economy someone really good should command what I can command. However, this is used to lower wages. I have to wonder how long I'll be here. I can't compete with lower wages, willingness to move at my own expense, and if you quit or get fired, you get deported, so imagine how many hours this person will work?

    I work for a fortune 100 company.

    Its actually racist in 2 directions. First it discriminates against me by excluding american citizens. Its also racist against indians by forcing them to work for lower wages.

  19. Open Source == Free Labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get a kick out of programmers who complain all day long about low wages but then go home and program all evening and weekends on software projects that they give away for free. How does that not de-value programming skills? Just because it is voluntary instead of forced doesn't change the economic equation.

    1. Re:Open Source == Free Labor by jma05 · · Score: 1

      You don't understand open source at all. There is nothing that says you cannot have a business model on top of open source. Most of the open source software I use is written by paid programmers.

      Also, not every creative activity needs to be an economic activity. Many of the cherished human accomplishments through history were not driven by economic motives. Only a subset of activities which can be predictably modeled with cost-benefit analyses lend themselves to be cast as economic activities. If you entirely stick to such things, you will have more in common with ants and bees than with being human.

      When I do work for an economic motive, I have expectations of fairness, transparency and justice. I do not surrender these expectations by merely engaging in non-economic activity.

    2. Re:Open Source == Free Labor by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      In addition, working on an open source project could be a resume-booster both in where you have worked (3 years at Firm X, 4 years at Company Y, and 5 years contributing to Popular Open Source Project Z) and what skills you have (using an up-to-date technology on the open source project while your day job still is stuck on OLDER_TECHNOLOGY).

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:Open Source == Free Labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do understand open source. I also understand that business models CAN work on top of open source (even though about 99% make zero money). What I am saying is that if you work at something that has economic value but you donate your time and skills for "creative reasons" rather than for monetary reasons then don't be surprised when the overall value of that work is diminished.

      If all the neighborhood kids decided to mow lawns for free (even if their parents gave them a treat for being so "service minded") then don't be surprised if your kid can't make any money mowing lawns as a summer job.

    4. Re:Open Source == Free Labor by jma05 · · Score: 1

      Unpaid, hobby work can produce Dillo. It cannot produce Firefox or WebKit. A Dillo does not diminish the value of the paid programmers at Mozilla.

      Open Source allows money making vendors to collaborate. For instance, the Apache project produces open source code from many profitable vendors. Each project may not be viable when executed by any single vendor. But together, it makes the work lighter and the individual vendors can focus and compete on their core strengths while sharing the common load. Note that everyone is making money in the process.

      > even though about 99% make zero money

      Where are you drawing these numbers from? Most of the quality open source code is from paid people working on the clock. Are there many small projects done off the clock? Sure. But a very large chunk of critical and widely adopted code is created and maintained by paid people, with occasional exceptions leading to bugs like Heartbleed.

      There are projects that are meant to be open source projects (especially common infrastructure bits that we can all agree on) and there are projects that make economic sense only as proprietary projects and there is stuff in between. Open source is adding value, not diminishing it. You are seeing software value as a closed system when it isn't. Many of the traditional ideas of material markets don't exactly translate to software markets. Given the vibrancy and growth of software markets, it is that the other [markets and human enterprises] should take lessons from software markets when valid, not that the software markets should learn from classical markets.

  20. Re:my company lowered wages and all they get are h by Maxwell · · Score: 2

    He makes about 1/3 less than I do. In a free market economy someone really good should command what I can command.

    No, in a free market economy you would both be making *his* wages. What you are advocating for is a protected economy - you want the government to put rules in place (or to maintain/enforce existing ones) to ensure artificially high wages for your particular skill set. You believe the status quo must be kept as is, even in a shifting global economy.

  21. Situation at my place of work by giftedtiger74 · · Score: 1

    This will sound racist or at the very least xenophobic but..

    Some days I don't even notice that I'm one of 5-10 american's in my shop of 120 in a large DC based non-profit.

    Other days I get tired of reading through only resumes for H1B visa holders. Many have bachelors degrees in non-technical fields, with a moderately recent technical field masters degree from their home country.

    85-90% of the development team of 100 are from out of country. 99% of the QA team. The only teams that are reasonably balanced demographically are the designer and system engineering/admin team (I'm the senior member of the latter).

    I've noticed the hours many of the developers and QA staff put in, it's obscene, and not something I would ever consider. I know without a doubt the reason they're willing to do so. It's a highly inefficient system, and results in a mono-culture and group-think in regards to creating solutions to software problems.

    As one of the primary decision maker for hiring within my team, I make a conscious effort to fairly employee american citizens, and visa holders.

  22. No one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...is surprised! This is a simple fact of life anymore. They are using the H1-B visa system to get around constitutional rights. If they can't force Americans to work for peanuts due to labor laws they will import slaves that have no constitutional rights! The real problem is that capitalism can't compete with slavery, and slavery is basically legal in the majority of the industrialized world with exception of the USA and a few others. Abraham Lincoln knew that capitalism couldn't compete with slavery, and that is the real reason why he opposed slavery so strongly. So, in order to prolong the decline of our economy companies have chose to abuse the H1-B visa system. This results in the H1-B workers getting treated poorly, but they are still treated better here than in other countries for example: At Foxconn factories, where iPhones are made, there is onsite housing, and workers used to be "encouraged to live on site" by Foxconn taking the Rent money for on site housing out of their paychecks whether they lived on site or not. That isn't the case anymore, but the fact that it used to happen speaks volumes about how much better the H1-B workers are treated here regardless of the shitty pay! The only way this will ever stop is if the H1-B visa system is re-worked, and manufacturing principles change. The reason why the economy used to be good here is even though stuff cost more when it was made in the USA our products were considered quality. It's when companies started cutting corners that people didn't want to pay a premium price for something made in the USA that was the same quality as something made in Taiwan, or China. This in turn caused production of products to be moved overseas where labor is cheaper, and thus quality could be increased. There is a lot more to it but that's basically it.

    1. Re:No one... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Technically, anyone on American soil has Constitutional rights. Some of that can be skirted if you're here illegally, but not entirely.

      There was already a recent case in one of the southern states here police were unconstitutionally pulling people over that looked Hispanic. They eventually found someone that was here illegally, tried to deport them, but the Federal court caught wind and said because that person was unconstitutionally racially profiled, the state was not allowed to deport them or use any evidence collected from the pull over to later deporting that person. This also meant they were driving illegally.

      The police knew where this illegal immigrant lived, but because they obtained the address via illegal means, they can no longer use that knowledge to deport that person. The federal judge was quite livid about the situation.

      The illegal immigrant was let off scott-free and allowed to stay, but was still here illegally. Freaking awesome.

  23. Solution: Drop H1B and make immigration easier by goruka · · Score: 1

    The shortage of skilled workers in IT is a real problem, this leads to wages being high for those with ample experience in the field.
    The fact that companies can't get a hold of them due to elevated cost of the hire, makes them resort to H1B. Foreign workers, in turn, will gladly work for a low payment in exchange of a better standard of living. This is wrong.
    Just allow skilled foreigners to immigrate normally, and don't give control over their stay to companies. This way everyone will play on an even field and the whole industry benefits.

    1. Re:Solution: Drop H1B and make immigration easier by lophophore · · Score: 1

      There is no shortage of skilled IT workers.

      There is a shortage of skilled IT workers who are willing to work for what they perceive are "below market wages."

      I can tell you as a person who has been hiring, you need to be willing to pay for quality. If you aren't willing to pay, the next best thing is H1B, where you get almost as much quality for significantly less cost.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    2. Re:Solution: Drop H1B and make immigration easier by goruka · · Score: 1

      Exactly, but it's not workers who determine what an acceptable market wage is but companies. Otherwise if there were only 5 capable guys in X field in the US, and 20 outside, you could also argue that there is no shortage either with the same argument because they really are worth as much.

      This is why I say, there IS a shortage, the problem is that some people does not want to stop being paid high wages.

  24. H1B visas often a Cheating and cost thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA can use some strong laws as in other countries , Hiring foreigners when citizens can be used in a Criminal offense in many countries , So should it be in USA.
    This practice of hiring them to get tax breaks/cheats and pay them Coolie wages MUST STOP. There should be many layers to get an H1B worker and federal authorities should interview the US citizen the company rejected.Then, if found qualified, They should unmercifully fine the company and jail the owners .

  25. Retaining records is not cost-less by davidwr · · Score: 1

    retaining electronic records like the LCA is next to costless

    There's more to retaining records than retaining records.

    There's the cost of remembering where they are, the cost of going through the human process of vetting access requests to make sure they are legit then extracting and possibly redacting data and giving it to the person requesting the data, and the big cost:

    The cost of embarrassment when someone finds something in the records that you *as a manager or institution) either know is there and prefer that it never be found or that they find something there that even you didn't know was there but which you definitely wish had never been found.

    The Boy Scouts of America learned that the hard way. I'm betting more than a few Scout Executives over the last few years secretly wish that, starting in the 1920s, the Scouts had simply turned over the information on allegedly-abusive Scout leaders to the local police (who, given the desires to not embarrass the Scouts at the time, would've probably handled most cases quietly) and put purged all "ineligible volunteer" files after 20 or 30 years, on the assumption that if, 20 or 30 years later, that person applied to be a volunteer and he had no criminal record then he was no more a danger than someone who had never volunteered with the Scouts before who also had no criminal record.

    Fortunately for everyone, the Scouts did retain records, purging them only when the person turned 75, which (back in the 1920s) was a reasonable age as very few 75-year-olds who hadn't been Scouters in recent years would apply to be Scouters.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Retaining records is not cost-less by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      There's more to retaining records than retaining records.

      There's the cost of remembering where they are, the cost of going through the human process of vetting access requests to make sure they are legit then extracting and possibly redacting data and giving it to the person requesting the data, and the big cost:

      The cost of embarrassment when someone finds something in the records that you *as a manager or institution) either know is there and prefer that it never be found or that they find something there that even you didn't know was there but which you definitely wish had never been found.

      All of those things are costs, but they're not legitimate costs. The correct solution is not to purge the records, but rather to purge the corruption and set up a simple FTP site (or maybe read-only database access, if applicable) so the public has instant access to the records without any bullshit "vetting" or redaction!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  26. Pretty much why I am turning down US job offers .. by janoc · · Score: 2

    I am from EU, however this situation around the H-1B visa is why I am not even remotely interested in most of the job offers from the US that I am getting.

    I have been in a similar situation in Europe before my country entered the EU and it is a lot of "fun" when you have to go every year to the immigration office, apply for a work permit renewal and pray that some clerk didn't get off the bed with the wrong foot and won't deny your application because of some bizarre reason - forcing you to lose the job and to leave the country, potentially incurring catastrophic financial losses (relocating abroad/overseas is one heck expensive, especially on a short notice!). On top of that, there is the inevitable "second class" treatment of the foreign employees, because the company knows that if the guy decides to leave, his or her permit is cancelled and they would have to leave the country on a short notice. The alternative is to have their new employer re-apply for the visa/permit again, but that must be done while the applicant lives outside of the country (yay, Switzerland ...), waiting another 6+ months for the paperwork to go through, with no guarantee of success ...

    Sorry, but this is not how you treat skilled workers that you are ostensibly so interested in.

    The US is doing itself a lot of disservice with this, because apart from the horrid H-1B regime, there is little else available for foreign workers (good luck trying to get the "green card" ...). I am sure there are many companies that use the visa responsibly and treat their foreign employees decently, but it is still a pretty big sword hanging over one's head.

    I am certainly not expecting any entitlement to have a job in the US as a foreigner, but right now if someone wanted to hire me, they would have to offer a very sweet deal for it to be worth the gamble with the visas for me.

  27. Re: my company lowered wages and all they get are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cisco, visa, Sandisk, brocade, most large law firms, basically any company large enough where you know the name, have a sea of brown people Thier IT building. You can boycot most of these companies. And some you just can't avoid. They ALL do it. This slave wage labor is the new America, Americans just haven't figured it out. I really don't know what to do. I still need to make a living.

  28. This just cannot be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the big tech companies have denied it. Must not be true. End of story.

    When will people wake up to the realization that multinational corporations hold no particular allegiance to the United States, their host countries, or to their employees? They will gladly transfer technology to repressive, hostile regimes like China to fatten their short term profits and executive compensation. H1B is solely a means to drive the cost of U.S. skilled labor to third world levels. Believing differently is willful ignorance.

  29. Quick - destroy the records! by DavidHumus · · Score: 2

    ...the U.S. changed its H-1B record retention policy last week, declaring that records used for labor certification, whether in paper or electronic, "are temporary records and subject to destruction" after five years under the new policy. "There was no explanation for the change, and it is perplexing to researchers," reports Computerworld.

    "Perplexing to researchers" would not be perplexing to criminal investigators.

  30. Re:my company lowered wages and all they get are h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes and no. It's currently partially a protected economy due to the greencard issue. If immigration was "as you please", this would quickly eliminate the trouble H1Bs face, and the trouble the employee in that company face. Why?

    The H1B is trapped due to his inability to work anywhere else without huge expense (moving back home). He rationalizes that taking an ever decreasing (or never increasing) wage is better than the cost of moving out of the country.

    If he were permitted to work as he pleases, this cheap company would be treated like all other low paying companies: It would be a stepping stool to access a better job. A few years of lower paying labour put in for access to a skillset and employment history that it comes with. He'd be searching soon for a job that pays more, thus depriving the fortune 100 company from their access to cheap *highly skilled* labour, exactly as it should be.

    Once he gains this new employment, your company's brain drain starts and they have the choice to plug the hole (pay you, the skilled employee, more) or stop being a fortune 100 company as they sink to the bottom of the list.

    Of course, what I'm saying is tantamount to the destruction of the USA as we know it, since, according to some, every single $0.50 a day wage earner from Elbonia will move here all at once. I personally don't believe that--the US offered much more open immigration policies 50+ years ago, and that's when people considered the US was at its best.

  31. HOw about J1 Visas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheap labour from India is brought on this visa and it circumvents the salary requirements for H1B1 visas(which also can be subverted). I know of cases where the engineer from India as living in company housing and pulling his $600/month Indian salary. J1 visas were meant for visiting researchers or professors. Money talks and ...

  32. Re:my company lowered wages and all they get are h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, in a truely free market they'd both probably earn the domestic guys wage.

    The bargaining position of the H1B guy is much weaker.

    Unless you advocate that in a free market citizenship is worth nothing and anyone, even people in their "own" country, should be deportable to some cheap shit hole if they lose their job.

  33. Re:my company lowered wages and all they get are h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He makes about 1/3 less than I do. In a free market economy someone really good should command what I can command.

    No, in a free market economy you would both be making *his* wages. What you are advocating for is a protected economy - you want the government to put rules in place (or to maintain/enforce existing ones) to ensure artificially high wages for your particular skill set. You believe the status quo must be kept as is, even in a shifting global economy.

    He only commands less due to the requirement for sponsorship. If he had a greencard he could command what I command. Never ceases to amaze me how people twist responses...

  34. Bring back Carter era tax brackets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The solution?

    Bring back the Carter Era tax brackets, and punish the executives and corporations who are profiteering by keeping wages low.

    Make them spend it to expand their businesses and pay employees or let them fork out 70% in taxes.

  35. Re:Pretty much why I am turning down US job offers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am a European citizen living in California after six years on an H1B visa and now several years of permanent residence.

    I don't doubt that these abuses occur at some companies, but there *are* companies who are interested in just hiring talent from wherever they can find it and paying above market rate to retain that talent. The US job market is a lot more cutthroat than in the main EU countries, with far fewer legal protections for workers and thus far more variability in working standards, but if you understand that going in and do your research you can do just fine.

    I had a pretty easy case of a medium-sized company that got acquired by a slightly larger medium-sized company when I was on year 2 of my H1B visa, leading to a pretty straightforward transfer of visa and the only inconvenience being my green card application got delayed for a year while they repeated the labor certifications.

    Other people I know in similar situations have run into other issues like their startup going out of business or laying them off. All of them who wanted to stay were able to find other jobs and transfer their visas. Others have actually left my company and transferred their visas to other companies with no problem whatsoever. I've never known anyone who was trapped or treated badly.

    It's not all doom and gloom out here. If you have valuable skills and you choose the right job market (San Francisco Bay Area is the obvious choice) then there is lots of money to be made and career development to be had, even if you're from Europe. I compete with my US citizen peers with my skills and passion, not with lower wages. In fact, half of the manager/tech-leader tier in my organization (of which I am a member, after being promoted twice during my tenure) are foreign nationals from Europe, either currently on H1B visas or formerly on H1B and subsequently granted permanent residence.

    Larger companies like Twitter even have employee incentives aimed specifically at immigrant workers. I'm not a Twitter employee so I don't know all the details, but some of my former co-workers (who transferred to Twitter while still on H1B visas) were immediately put on the green card track and tell me that the company offers in-office-hours training on things like understanding the US corporate culture, improving your English accent, and eventually helping you study for citizenship interviews/tests if that is the path you want to take. My company is smaller and not able to provide such perks, but they still put me on the green card track after only a year of tenure (green card application is expensive) and were supportive of my need to occasionally spend days waiting in government offices for various reasons.

  36. try 30p an hour by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    in the UK they imported master stonemasons to build a temple and where caught paying them around 30p an hour - I know the guy that was involved I putting a stop to this

  37. I Really Don't Know What I Don't Like More? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    The H1 B visa system, and any business that used it.
    Or, those same businesses that have abused any non american national using the H1B visa system.
    Or, the grinning showoff that thinks, "so what?"

  38. High-level management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way out is decentralization - instead of paying a big corporation for a license, we should be crowd-funding free software bounties. Keep a close eye on Mike Hearn's Lighthouse.

  39. Best Bet: Contribute to NumbersUSA by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

    I hate to advise that. It is far from an optimal solutions. But, NumbersUSA is about the only organization with any juice at all, that is opposing the visa worker scam.

    Again, I have a lot of problems with NumbersUSA. They are very strongly republican, although repubs are just as bad about immigration as dems. Also, they much more concerned with illegal immigration from Mexico, than they are with issues of visa workers.

    Still, as I said, they are probably the best organization out there.

  40. Sen. Hatch: high-skilled worker shortage a crises by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

    > Hatch, in a speech at the corporate offices of Overstock.com in Salt Lake City, called for raising the cap on H-1B visas. "Our high-skilled worker shortage has become a crisis," said Hatch, who heads the Senate Republican High-Tech Task Force.

    http://www.computerworld.com/article/2838619/sen-hatch-calls-high-skilled-worker-shortage-a-crisis.html

  41. Tie expansion to wage figures by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    If the demand for domestic tech workers really did outstrip the supply then the wages/salary for these positions would be increasing in response. The H1B program should be reorganized such that expansions in the number of issued visas can only happen when there is real evidence of a shortage through rising income.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  42. The depressing part by sdguero · · Score: 1

    The depressing part is there really isn't anything we can do about it. Voters by and large don't care. IT workers get paid more than Joe the Plumber, and the job is much easier than tearing out sewer pipes.

    1. Re:The depressing part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> IT workers get paid more than Joe the Plumber???????

      Ha! Think again, most experienced plumbers make well into 6 figures.

    2. Re:The depressing part by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      You are wrong, Joe Plumber typically makes two times or more what average IT worker does.

      And mostly those know-nothing foreign HB1 are useless, they are overpaid.

  43. Same reason Obomneycare was delayed. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Handjobs for corporations are unpopular when conglomerates are sitting on mountains of cash while real unemployment remains high. So, expanding the H1-Facscist program will be postponed until after the midterms, so Democrats running for office wont have to answer pesky questions about why we should be importing more workers when so many Americans are out of work.

  44. The 2nd is a legitimate cost by davidwr · · Score: 1

    While I agree that the cost of embarrassment is not a legitimate cost, the cost associated with having someone available to screen records and the cost of tracking where records are kept is just as legitimate as the cost of disk/tape/paper-file storage for keeping them in the first place.

    I for one don't want my bank keeping records about me and either saying "sorry, since we don't have anyone to screen access, nobody can access them" or the polar opposite, "sorry, since we don't have anyone to screen access, everyone can access them your privacy be ****'ed."

    It is only records which are 100% public that don't need screeners. Even many records on deposit at America's courthouses don't meet this requirement: In some states it used to be routine for military service people to deposit some military records with the courthouse for safe-keeping. These included Social Security Numbers. In the modern age of identity theft, court clerks now routinely redact Social Security Numbers when someone requests a copy of these records.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  45. but you can't be too sure by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    that the random person off the street will be an old white guy, so you'd be right back where you started.

    1. Re:but you can't be too sure by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      that the random person off the street will be an old white guy, so you'd be right back where you started.

      Well, I'd say the "old while guys" had a pretty good track record up till a couple presidents ago.

      So far, the young black guy....not so much.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  46. it's based on reality by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    The fact that your friend and corporate overlord was suddenly against universal healthcare should have been a good enough indication that any advances were despite him and not because of him.

    1. Re:it's based on reality by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      The fact that your friend and corporate overlord was suddenly against universal healthcare should have been a good enough indication that any advances were despite him and not because of him.

      Well, the majority of the US still isn't for this "universal health care" they way it has been forced down our throats.

      I know MY costs have gone up significantly, with less coverage. And so far, nothing on the horizon showing the healthcare costs will be coming down rather than steadily increasing.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  47. Re:my company lowered wages and all they get are h by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    You believe the status quo must be kept as is, even in a shifting global economy.

    Oh, so we're free to buy goods and housing at third world prices? All the CEO's that make more than $500k a year have been fired and replaced with MBA's from India? No and no you say? Then it sounds like the "global economy" is still really a "capitalist crock of shit".

  48. I am racist against stupid by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    I'm tempted to say that's a first world view. It's a lofty ideal, and might work if the playing field were more level, but when you're incorporating programmers from third world countries, who are looking forward to a subsistence wage in some craphole, it's hard to tell them to go on strike. These people are looking forward to 70 hour weeks (I've seen this, with H-1B workers locally) at lower-middle-class wages, as something that's *still* one hell of a lot better than they came from.

    I suspect that attempts to organize will be taken as first worlders trying to save their overly-cushy jobs.

    I would support organizing to keep out most Indian programmers, because many of the Indian programmer I have meet are poorly trained coders that produce sub-standard code. But then I don't really care about nationality or race, I just am annoyed by bad coders. Construction unions have differing categories of skill sets that enables you to work on certain types of jobs. Such a system would be good for IT to keep idiots from building database solutions on top of Excell spreadsheets.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  49. US immigration in a nutshell by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

    got family in the US to sponsor your green card? WELCOME! you have a right to everything including social security. you can flip burgers or work for nasa..we don't care. and you can get your citizenship in just a few years.

    got skills? advanced stem degrees from the US? indentured servitude visa for you...maybe! green card is a dream. you must be employed in this specific thing or else! YOU MUST COMPLY! YOU ARE A FOREIGNER! YOU WILL BE A FOREIGNER FOR A DECADE! GET USED TO IT OR GO BACK HOME!

    --
    --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
    1. Re:US immigration in a nutshell by citab · · Score: 1

      I agree ... this is not right. I am american so I don't have a problem obviously, however I work with many good programmers from India who are feeling very wronged by this situation. And I think rightly so.

      These are competent professionals, who have nice families and mouths to feed. It's a crime that they are treated like this. This type of arrangement was supposed to be abolished long ago. But here it is again in the 21st century.

      I say get rid of these rules and allow free market to determine who gets paid what and all are allowed to work where they are wanted most. If workers come to this country and they are not up to the level of others, they will be paid less or lose their jobs anyway, but it'll be free market reasons... not rules giving power over them to keep them in low wages to get their green card.

      I don't know if anyone has mentioned this ... but when they switch employers ... the clock resets on their wait for a green card. Disgraceful!

      HOME OF THE FREE MY ASS!!!

  50. Unionize so that we can: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Watch our new union bosses climb into bed with the Democrat party and give part of each of our paychecks to the party?

    2. Watch as the Democrats repay our unoin bosses by passing laws that make it so we cannot hold a job in our field without being in the union?

    3. Watch as the Democrats repay our union bosses by passing laws that make it so the government takes our union dues directly from our paychecks?

    ALL of the above happened with the school teachers in Wisconsin when they unionized, which is why the unions there are at WAR againsts the governor who undid these three things (every month he is in power is a month the labor bosses lose money and political power, meanwhile the teachers who no longer have their paychecks looted have boon voting with their feet: a HUGE portion have left the union)

    4. Watch as our new union bosses support the Democrat "open boarders" initiative in the name of diversity, giving lip service to protecting us and our jobs while actually supporting a massive increase in foreign labor which pushes-down wages (google: Richard Trumpka)

    Sorry, but NO. The call to unionize is the single most insane bit of blather that is always offered to the middle class by the left as all the other policies of the left drive wages down. No matter what they say in public to their members, all of America''s big labor bosses are "all-in" with Obama and his plans to make millions more people eligible to work in the US (which will inevitable drive wages down due to that most basic economic law: the laww of supply and demand).

    1. Re:Unionize so that we can: by knightghost · · Score: 1

      Cherry picking and exaggeration. There are problems with both extremes - so lets get back into the middle. Down with extremism! Which includes both political parties.

  51. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You label this "ironic" and I wonder why. Because of his skin color? It cannot be because of his ancestry; Obama is NOT descended from slaves as so many other black Americans are. His father was an African man who had no ancestors who were slaves in America. His (white) mother had ancestors who OWNED slaves. Other than pigmentation, Obama has very little in common with most black Americans, so unless you are referring to skin color I see no source of irony.

    In fact, opening the spigot to a flood of new low-paid workers is anything BUT ironic for Obama who is ideologically a "social justice" guy - it's the idea that any poor person on Earth should be able to freely enter the US for "his share" of the wealth, with no concern for the middle class Americans he hurts because they just do not know how good they've had it and how undeserved their good fortune was. The man is an Alinsky follower, and destroying the system from within by flooding it with poor "entitled" people in need of benefits has been the plan for decades (not foil-hat conspircay "plan" but rather an actual documented plan about which they themselves have written books)

    The REAL irony here is that hard-left people like Obama and Hillary believe they are doing this stuff for "social justice" and to usher-in some utopian socialist future, while establishment Republicans like the Bush clan do the EXACT same thing believing they are doing it in the service of free markets BUT both sets of political animals are actually doing it in the service of Wall St Bankers for the benefit of their investment returns on the big companies pushing down wages and benefits. The bankers have no intention of allowing this to lead to actual socialism OR actual free markets. Oh, and the Obamas, Clintons and Bushes will do their banker masters' bidding actually joining together in opposing any politician as "radical" and "dangerous" who stands against these policies.

  52. Ok then, by THAT logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody should be forced to join the military, since everybody benefits from national defense and everybody should be forced to joing the police and fire departments since we all benefit indirectly.

    Oh, I know, you will say "ok, then you do not need to JOIN, but you need to pay dues just as people pay taxes for the military, police, fire, etc"

    THIS argument (pay dues WITHOUT joining) SEEMS to make sense, except for the following: Unions in the US are heavily involved in politics, money is fungible, and there is no proof that a qualified and skilled employee could not negotiate the same pay and benefits on his own. In fact, there is every reason to believe that the union (which does indeed get higher pay and benefits for mediocre employees) actually indirectly supresses the wages of achievers; the excellent non-union employee who goes in to negotiate his own compensation package can find himself confronted by management who cannot compensate him better without running afoul of the union.

  53. I honestly don't understand this sentiment. by Brannon · · Score: 0

    I don't think Obama is perfect--but I'm completely befuddled at any notion that he's worse than Bush. Do you have any idea how bad things were under Bush? Think about it for a second:
    1. We went to war in Iraq under a false premise at the cost exceeding a trillion dollars and thousands of American lives, hundreds of thousands of troops deployed
    2. We suffered a nearly complete collapse of the economy. worst recession since the great depression ultimately resulting in unemployment >10%.
    3. Andrew Card & Karl Rove exposed an undercover CIA agent for political reasons--Bush pardoned Card and lets Rove slide
    4. Disastrous response to Hurricane Katrina
    5. 45 million+ Americans without health insurance with skyrocketing health care costs
    6. September 11th ...the list goes on and on...

    Now think about: what Obama has accomplished:
    1. A nearly completely recovered economy, Unemployment around 5%.
    2. Dramatic reduction in uninsured people and a significant slowing of health care cost increases
    3. Competent responses to disasters (BP oil spill, Hurricane Sandy, etc.)
    4. Withdrawal of nearly all military personnel in Iraq & Afghanistan, no new wars.

    1. Re:I honestly don't understand this sentiment. by knightghost · · Score: 1

      Real unemployment is 19% (6% short term, 6% long term, 0.5 * 15% underemployed). Use the U-6 if you want to be at least semi-realistic.
      Oh, and 23% wage reduction.

      Hurricane Sandy $60b was 99% waste. I was there. Almost all damage was self induced, starting with failure to trim trees from power lines (over 10k outages).

      Much better than Romney (Bush 2.0) but mediocre at best. Democrats are incompetent when it comes to economics. But Republicans are evil.

  54. seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the problem is more that there are middelmen who are acting as "talent scouts" who are abusing the immigrants by offering to bring them to the US where they'll get a "high paying job" in exchange for a cut.

    Then it turns out that the "cut" is unreasonable and there is an indefinite wait between when the worker arrives and when they get placed during which they're treated essentially as chattel.

  55. Re:Pretty much why I am turning down US job offers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This!

    I too am a European citizen living in California (not Bay Area though). My company is one of the good guys with regard to H1Bs: they pay for all relocation costs (easily $10,000-20,000), pay the same wages as for a U.S. citizen, and after a year on an H1B they offer to sponsor you for a green card. I've been here 8 years: 3 years on H1B and 5 years as a permanent resident.

    This is how the H1B program is supposed to work. I don't doubt there are many companies abusing the program, the horror stories are legion after all. But the problem as I see it is more about lack of enforcement than flaws in the program itself. That may be a distinction that doesn't help much, but it's important I think to understand that there are plenty of rules in the program about how employers must behave. Those rules are often just not followed, there's little to no enforcement, and penalties are rarely applied. That's the issue with the program right now, not the lack of rules altogether. A whole other separate but related discussion is the green card program and the crazy wait times for anyone not in the EB2 category and especially for anyone from India and China because of per-country numerical caps.

  56. ...which is exchanging for less security. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    So is the alternative, the defined-contribution model.

    You get less overall performance and casino-like odds on returns.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  57. Re:my company lowered wages and all they get are h by Maxwell · · Score: 1

    You believe the status quo must be kept as is, even in a shifting global economy.

    Oh, so we're free to buy goods and housing at third world prices? All the CEO's that make more than $500k a year have been fired and replaced with MBA's from India? No and no you say? Then it sounds like the "global economy" is still really a "capitalist crock of shit".

    Other than locally grown food, the price of durable goods is pretty consistent around the world. I've been there, I know. So your strawman "third world pricing" falls apart pretty fast. Do you have any example of this pricing disparity? If you find any, yes, you are free to purchase and import at will.

    And yes there are tons of MBA's from India over here. My MBA class (class of '07) was roughly 1/3 China, 1/3 India and 1/3 north america/europe. That mix is typical for most top end MBA programs. Some go back to India/China, some stay here.

    Perhaps your problem is you don't really understand what "global" means, or appreciate the benefits you get from it.

  58. film about tech worker abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This movie is hard to find - but look for it or ask for it . I saw it last week and it is very well done:

    http://distancebetweenus.com

    plb

  59. Silliness everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an mescalero apache. I suppose that makes me an American one but there never was an American mescalero apache before someone made up that they now own the land. Any how I believe that everyone has a right to come here. I believe everyone needs to be able to live anywhere they want. Sure its not completely free here but everyone did decide to barter or give out some rules and someone brought this government into existence (we did and your parents did).
    Anyhow it should be that way everywhere (free to go and come as they please). Noone truly owns the land. The world is here for everyone.

  60. Americans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple things:
    Americans really don't get it that their vaunted 'productivity' relative to the rest of the world is because corporations invest so much in technology, more so in America than in any other country.
    Americans love to get paid high wages, but they love to buy cheap imports. That makes them individually as hypocritical as the 'evil corporations' they sit around and bitch about at their coffee houses 5 nights a week.
    Americans have come to the conclusion that a f*&king cell phone is somehow a right, that a dishwasher is somehow a right, that a democracy is the best form of government, that our Constitutional protections apply to some p3ck3rh3@d who lied to get here and wants to run into a mall with a bomb strapped to his back.

    We were established as a REPUBLIC, not a democracy. Democracy is the seedbed of socialism and the worst of all forms of government. Other than a truly benevolent dictatorship run by a good man (good luck with that) only in a representative republic with a slice and dice of powers like we originally had does an individual have any protection of individual rights and private property. The 17th Amendment to the Constitution was the equivalent of a drug addicted child stabbing his parent through the heart in order to steal the silverware with which to pay for drugs.

    You do not have a right to healthcare.
    You do not have a right to a home.
    You do not have a right to an education.
    You do not have a right to a piece of other's paychecks.
    You cannot print money from air without consequences.

    You do not have a right to ANYTHING for which SOMEONE ELSE must work to pay.

    America could be energy and agriculturally independent in less than five years if its people would pull their heads out of their @$$3$ for ten minutes and think about it and that means quit buying s#!t from Chinamart and start buying from your own people. ...and if you get welfare, you need to have to perform some kind of work for it, too. (I just heard a bunch of Progressive heads explode.)

    Americans don't like the immigrants coming here? Good grief, all those men and women want to do is work; all Americans want to do is bitch. Quit making it profitable to bring immigrants here by your buying habits and they will quit coming. ...but you won't do it. As long as you have NASCAR, cable, and can sit around an argue about who is the most tolerant of aberrant behavior your will feel smug and self-satisfied until the 21st century version of the Gestapo kicks down your door and you die with a confused look on your faces at the hands of the very men and women you elected.

  61. I agree, this is a racket by sptsailing · · Score: 1

    I agree. It is all too clear that the H-1B program is simply a way to exploit foreign workers and eviscerate the middle class. In addition, the de-facto elimination of borders between Central America and the United States also depresses wages for even the unskilled workers. All of these things benefit only the elite. An additional revolution, as Jefferson implied, may be required after all.

  62. Lower caste by NewYork · · Score: 1

    If this is the plight of H1B in USA, can you imagine the living/working conditions of 800 million Lower caste people in India.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_politics_in_India

  63. I'm surprised by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Why H1B is NOT included in http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_collar_crimes

  64. Re:my company lowered wages and all they get are h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, so we're free to buy goods and housing at third world prices?

    No, mostly because people like you work hard to keep cheap good from being importated.

    All the CEO's that make more than $500k a year have been fired and replaced with MBA's from India?

    Why, yes, we're getting there:

    http://online.wsj.com/articles...

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/ro...

    http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/...

    http://www.hbs.edu/recruiting/...

    So, the percentage of foreign-born workers at the top is higher than for regular folks. But you'll find some way of working yourself up about that too.

  65. Re:my company lowered wages and all they get are h by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    No, mostly because people like you work hard to keep cheap good from being importated.

    On some planet where every product in Wal-Mart and every piece of electronics isn't already made in China?

    Why, yes, we're getting there

    Why, how many of those immigrants are being paid $200k a year to replace corporate executives pulling in 8 figures a year? What does Larry Ellison do for $100 - $200 million every 12 months that a team of Ph.d's from Bangladesh wouldn't do for a million, total?