Dreamweaver and other WYIWYG editors for web pages sucked ass though.
These days we have simple web frameworks that allow you to set up web pages simply unless you have different standards
Then give them clear rules, not the rubbish they have, require a court to send them a list that they must disable. It is not correct to have them have to deal with the vagueness and decide what to do in all situaitons.
That does not mean she wants to do it.. You are comparing someone who will cut funding if there is no timeline to someone who just wants to cut funding....
Actually he is using half facts. The budgets went up during the bush era due to the dems having congress, and the reverse during the clinton administration. The president does not have much control over the budget itself, his entire argument makes it out to be the case that they do.
I love how you chose part of a paragraph, and even part of the sentence so it loses all context:
And last month, the Government Accountability Office found that, thanks to the lack of a credible schedule for the project as a whole, even those estimates are not reliable. Given the situation, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D–CA), the chair of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, warned at a 9 April subcommittee hearing that the U.S. program could be in jeopardy. "This may be an opportunity to experience the power of the purse," she said.
The bold gives the statement needed context and shows that she does not necessarily want to shut it down, and it does not even show that she is on board at this momement. And even still you will note that I mentioned her in my statement.
Take a look at the article, the only person it actually mentions specifically as trying to do this is a republican. I am not saying no dems are on board (feindstein said it could be an opportunity for the dems to close some purse strings itself), but your broad statement there fails miserably.
s the subcommittee followed through on that threat, even a senator from a state directly involved in the U.S. ITER project spoke in favor of ending it. U.S. ITER has its headquarters at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee. Nevertheless, at a 17 June hearing on the budget bill covering DOE, Senator Lamar Alexander (R–TN), the ranking member on the Energy and Water Subcommittee, said that ITER hasn’t shown the progress it should. "We’ve withdrawn funding for the program," he said, and "that saves taxpayers $75 million this year, and at least $3.9 billion, and potentially $6.5 billion, over the life of the project.”
Please point out the hate speech. Nothing there I stated was hate speech, it was fact, but keep up with that red herring, while letting the person who actually did use name calling free..
It is Russia's spy agency's job to spy on us, that does not make it ok for them to do, as I am sure you would not be happy about it spying on you if you found out it actually did.
If citizens united went the other way you still would not have lost your rights,,,,You still have the right and do anything you want, just not use corporate assets for it.
It does not define it in any way other than what is in the dictionary. What it chooses is the scope of what costs it wants to see if it pays back. In addition plenty of people try to objectively measure. I dont know how many times a skeptic against a tech will talk about how the costs to to produce a given item is more than the benefits that it saves, batteries are one such item....
Slashdot Mirror
Dreamweaver and other WYIWYG editors for web pages sucked ass though. These days we have simple web frameworks that allow you to set up web pages simply unless you have different standards
FTFY
Governments dont just think about what YOU will do, they have to think about what the entire populace will do.
Then give them clear rules, not the rubbish they have, require a court to send them a list that they must disable. It is not correct to have them have to deal with the vagueness and decide what to do in all situaitons.
Except they ruled for a Businessman, who by nature has a public standing, so it is very contradictory.
Umm, they are not the stewards of the information, they just point to it. It is not their jobs to police the internet for you.
That does not mean she wants to do it.. You are comparing someone who will cut funding if there is no timeline to someone who just wants to cut funding....
Actually he is using half facts. The budgets went up during the bush era due to the dems having congress, and the reverse during the clinton administration. The president does not have much control over the budget itself, his entire argument makes it out to be the case that they do.
And last month, the Government Accountability Office found that, thanks to the lack of a credible schedule for the project as a whole, even those estimates are not reliable. Given the situation, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D–CA), the chair of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, warned at a 9 April subcommittee hearing that the U.S. program could be in jeopardy. "This may be an opportunity to experience the power of the purse," she said.
The bold gives the statement needed context and shows that she does not necessarily want to shut it down, and it does not even show that she is on board at this momement. And even still you will note that I mentioned her in my statement.
AND? 4billion is a ridiculously small amount for it.
s the subcommittee followed through on that threat, even a senator from a state directly involved in the U.S. ITER project spoke in favor of ending it. U.S. ITER has its headquarters at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee. Nevertheless, at a 17 June hearing on the budget bill covering DOE, Senator Lamar Alexander (R–TN), the ranking member on the Energy and Water Subcommittee, said that ITER hasn’t shown the progress it should. "We’ve withdrawn funding for the program," he said, and "that saves taxpayers $75 million this year, and at least $3.9 billion, and potentially $6.5 billion, over the life of the project.”
Please point out the hate speech. Nothing there I stated was hate speech, it was fact, but keep up with that red herring, while letting the person who actually did use name calling free..
Because if I counter one side I have to be a partisan bigot with political hate speech, I cannot be able to recognize the flaws of both sides right?
You act like conservatives would uphold employees rights over employers contracts...Being in the south east I can tell you that is not true typically
Tell us that the next time you wanna file a class action suit against any service provider you use...
Make angled sides on the signal to that you can only see it from like a +/- 5 degree angle, or less, and use sounds for the blind.
Did you read? It is not the FTC, it is the state regulators.
Citation that the president used the IRS please... Have they found some actual link other then accusations?
Conservatives are less likely to use it then liberals. The whole IP monopoly concept is something the conservative love.
It is Russia's spy agency's job to spy on us, that does not make it ok for them to do, as I am sure you would not be happy about it spying on you if you found out it actually did.
Well in this case they were still only worshiping profit, as identified by the fact that they invested in these contraceptives.
If citizens united went the other way you still would not have lost your rights,,,,You still have the right and do anything you want, just not use corporate assets for it.
If that was the case blood transfusions and vaccinations would not have been specifically excepted out. This was based 100 faith based.
Just because a corporation you own does not have rights does not mean that you dont either....
Non-renewable energy conversion..... You guys are really bad at this arnt you.
It does not define it in any way other than what is in the dictionary. What it chooses is the scope of what costs it wants to see if it pays back. In addition plenty of people try to objectively measure. I dont know how many times a skeptic against a tech will talk about how the costs to to produce a given item is more than the benefits that it saves, batteries are one such item....