SMTP is a weak protocol at best because it is a "push based" protocol. Replacement is most likely the best solution, but other people may speakout against replacement because it is not compatible with every prior SMTP related RFC. The ideas have been thrown around at best.
Organization of resources and people to change the system will be the first big step. Coming to an agreement on the feature set will be problematic because of the aforementioned compatibility issue and trying to anticipate future abuses and/or obstacles.
Does anyone know of a forum discussing replacement of SMTP?
Slashdot Mirror
You have to give the windows client time to reboot.
Lake Wobegone is where everything is above average.
I hope they did not spill any Tang.
Microsoft has announced the release of WindowsUpdate Version 5.0
Video + Audio >= 2GB
SMTP is a weak protocol at best because it is a "push based" protocol. Replacement is most likely the best solution, but other people may speakout against replacement because it is not compatible with every prior SMTP related RFC. The ideas have been thrown around at best.
Organization of resources and people to change the system will be the first big step. Coming to an agreement on the feature set will be problematic because of the aforementioned compatibility issue and trying to anticipate future abuses and/or obstacles.
Does anyone know of a forum discussing replacement of SMTP?
tony