Funny seeing it's leaking already, in a nice controlled arc at 2 mph. Floor was so clean too. I thought the remote controls on air conditioners were weird too, but so useful for high or odd spots. This RC park / un-park may be standard in 10 years.
I tried to find this out, but is turns out you can do nothing- it is a lame law imposing no method of seporating data, no oversite, no budget for enforcement, and worst, the corps are to monitor and enforce it on themselves... Below is an email thread.
Thanks for your patience.
We have an answer to your question in our
Fact Sheet 24d on our web, www.privacyrights.org,
our FAQ on this topic. It's not a cut-and-dried
answer. If you still have questions after reading
our discussion of this, please get back to me.
Beth
>Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 11:27:10 -0700
>From: Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>Subject: Fwd: RE: Re: What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>X-Sender: prc@mail.privacyrights.org
>To: prc@privacyrights.org
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
>
>
>>Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 10:22:35 -0700
>>From: Beth Givens
>>Subject: Fwd: RE: Re: What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>>X-Sender: bgivens@mail.privacyrights.org
>>To: prc@privacyrights.org
>>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
>>
>>
>>>From: "kaze"
>>>To: "Beth Givens"
>>>Subject: RE: Re: What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>>>Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 01:55:06 -0400
>>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
>>>Importance: Normal
>>>
>>>Beth,
>>>
>>>Thanks for the response, hopefully you can reply to this too, (again no
>>>rush.)
>>>
>>>It was a Chase credit card. Actually I do not want to take any action
>>>against them, as they rectified the mistake right away, also they actually
>>>have O.K. customer service, unlike 85% of the other corporations I deal
>>>with.
>>>
>>>Basically the incident prompted me to ask, what to do if a corp violates
>>>your opt out choices?
>>>
>>>Is it a violation of a federal law? Does the law detail actions for the
>>>victims? What would the law be referred to as?
>>>
>>>FYI they gave three opt out choices, as did all my other banks etc., sharing
>>>with other corps, intra-departmental sharing, and marketing.
>>>
>>>Z
>>>
>>>
>>>==> -----Original Message-----
>>>==> From: Beth Givens [mailto:bgivens@privacyrights.org]
>>>==> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:03 AM
>>>==> To: kaze@voicenet.com
>>>==> Subject: Fwd: Re: What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>>>==>
>>>==>
>>>==> Sorry for the delay in responding.
>>>==>
>>>==> Which credit card company did you opt out of?
>>>==> Did the company give you the ability to opt out
>>>==> of its own marketing, or only that of third parties?
>>>==> Thanks for any additional info you can provide.
>>>==>
>>>==> Beth givens
>>>==>
>>>==> >Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:44:41 -0700
>>>==> >From: Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>>>==> >Subject: Re: What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>>>==> >X-Sender: prc@mail.privacyrights.org
>>>==> >To: kaze
>>>==> >Cc: bgivens@privacyrights.org
>>>==> >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
>>>==> >
>>>==> >At 01:18 PM 08/17/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>>>==> >>What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>>>==> >>
>>>==> >>I opted out of everything with a credit card co on 6-11-01,
>>>==> and they gave me
>>>==> >>a marketing call 8-16-01. I called 8-17-01 and the CSR showed
>>>==> me opted out
>>>==> >>on 6-11-01 but was otherwise ignorant to everything.
>>>==> >>
>>>==> >>The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even
>>>==> >>touched. They must be felt with the heart.
>>>==> >>-- Helen Keller
>>>==> >
>>>==> >.
>>>==> >.
>>>==> >.
>>>==> >Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>>>==> >3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B
>>>==> >San Diego, CA 92103
>>>==> >
>>>==> >Voice: (619) 298-3396
>>>==> >Fax (619) 298-5681
>>>==> >E-mail: prc@privacyrights.org
>>>==> >Web: www.privacyrights.org
>>>==>
>>>==> .
>>>==> .
>>>==> Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>>>==> 3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B
>>>==> San Diego, CA 92103
>>>==> Phone: (619) 298-3396
>>>==> Fax: (619) 298-5681
>>>==> Email: prc@privacyrights.org
>>>==> Web: www.privacyrights.org
>>>==>
>>>==>
>>
>>.
>>Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>>3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B
>>San Diego, CA 92103
>>Voice: 619-298-3396
>>Fax: 619-298-5681
>>
>>
>
>.
>.
>.
>Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B
>San Diego, CA 92103
>
>Voice: (619) 298-3396
>Fax (619) 298-5681
>E-mail: prc@privacyrights.org
>Web: www.privacyrights.org
.
.
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B
San Diego, CA 92103
Phone: (619) 298-3396
Fax: (619) 298-5681
Email: prc@privacyrights.org
Web: www.privacyrights.org
Why didn't the in-law scientist ask any more questions at the July 4th thing?
How come hypnotism worked on the human host part of him, but the KPAKean wasn't aware of it?
Why was he so keen to talk about everything (except lightwave travel) and many other KPACeans are on earth, but we assume that none of the other aliens reveal themselves?
I saw one, I was sitting on a stoop at 307 N 3rd in Philadelphia waiting for someone just looking around at buildings and the sky and to the NW this big fireball zoomed by; looked to be about a mile away - no sound. I hoped it was a meteor, but thought it might be a small plane or a burning fuel dump from a larger plane. It got pretty low so some of them may have hit. Real quick, just like a shooting star where if your looking the wrong place or blink you'd miss it.
If you categorize the future of the computer and digital industries as being at least partially carried by the momentum and power of Linux and the Open Source movement; and realize that/. is a major portal there, one can see HUGE potential. To me./ is an aggregate of original realtime developing content, flowing in a kind of open way. "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." says it all! This particular URL branding of the/. community,/. site creators, et. al. is invaluable as it is and will shape and help dictate future status-quos and cultural norms. (We could all of course move to another URL - that might make it even more valuable as advertisers and marketers and users might feel it was back to the 'true inner circle' and loosing some trolls and wannabes, 'new' or whatever.) My point is that it is worth the most now and in the future staying and growing just as it is.
Any suggestions on training paths for MCSE's to take to get to be sub-guru level *nix profesionals. Is there anyway to tell in OpenSourcer's code has been used by Microsoft? If W2K does turn out to be a failure, do you see SP7 etc for NT4 coming out?
Slashdot Mirror
Is Livestrong's anti-cancer mission any less worthy now that Lance Armstrong is de-famed?
Sounds like an Onion story... I didn't RTFA though.
Funny seeing it's leaking already, in a nice controlled arc at 2 mph. Floor was so clean too. I thought the remote controls on air conditioners were weird too, but so useful for high or odd spots. This RC park / un-park may be standard in 10 years.
Actually that tiger did attack a zoo keeper about a year ago...
I tried to find this out, but is turns out you can do nothing- it is a lame law imposing no method of seporating data, no oversite, no budget for enforcement, and worst, the corps are to monitor and enforce it on themselves... Below is an email thread.
Thanks for your patience.
We have an answer to your question in our
Fact Sheet 24d on our web, www.privacyrights.org,
our FAQ on this topic. It's not a cut-and-dried
answer. If you still have questions after reading
our discussion of this, please get back to me.
Beth
>Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 11:27:10 -0700
>From: Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>Subject: Fwd: RE: Re: What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>X-Sender: prc@mail.privacyrights.org
>To: prc@privacyrights.org
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
>
>
>>Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 10:22:35 -0700
>>From: Beth Givens
>>Subject: Fwd: RE: Re: What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>>X-Sender: bgivens@mail.privacyrights.org
>>To: prc@privacyrights.org
>>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
>>
>>
>>>From: "kaze"
>>>To: "Beth Givens"
>>>Subject: RE: Re: What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>>>Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 01:55:06 -0400
>>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
>>>Importance: Normal
>>>
>>>Beth,
>>>
>>>Thanks for the response, hopefully you can reply to this too, (again no
>>>rush.)
>>>
>>>It was a Chase credit card. Actually I do not want to take any action
>>>against them, as they rectified the mistake right away, also they actually
>>>have O.K. customer service, unlike 85% of the other corporations I deal
>>>with.
>>>
>>>Basically the incident prompted me to ask, what to do if a corp violates
>>>your opt out choices?
>>>
>>>Is it a violation of a federal law? Does the law detail actions for the
>>>victims? What would the law be referred to as?
>>>
>>>FYI they gave three opt out choices, as did all my other banks etc., sharing
>>>with other corps, intra-departmental sharing, and marketing.
>>>
>>>Z
>>>
>>>
>>>==> -----Original Message-----
>>>==> From: Beth Givens [mailto:bgivens@privacyrights.org]
>>>==> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:03 AM
>>>==> To: kaze@voicenet.com
>>>==> Subject: Fwd: Re: What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>>>==>
>>>==>
>>>==> Sorry for the delay in responding.
>>>==>
>>>==> Which credit card company did you opt out of?
>>>==> Did the company give you the ability to opt out
>>>==> of its own marketing, or only that of third parties?
>>>==> Thanks for any additional info you can provide.
>>>==>
>>>==> Beth givens
>>>==>
>>>==> >Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:44:41 -0700
>>>==> >From: Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>>>==> >Subject: Re: What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>>>==> >X-Sender: prc@mail.privacyrights.org
>>>==> >To: kaze
>>>==> >Cc: bgivens@privacyrights.org
>>>==> >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
>>>==> >
>>>==> >At 01:18 PM 08/17/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>>>==> >>What to do if a corp violates your opt out choices?
>>>==> >>
>>>==> >>I opted out of everything with a credit card co on 6-11-01,
>>>==> and they gave me
>>>==> >>a marketing call 8-16-01. I called 8-17-01 and the CSR showed
>>>==> me opted out
>>>==> >>on 6-11-01 but was otherwise ignorant to everything.
>>>==> >>
>>>==> >>The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even
>>>==> >>touched. They must be felt with the heart.
>>>==> >>-- Helen Keller
>>>==> >
>>>==> >.
>>>==> >.
>>>==> >.
>>>==> >Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>>>==> >3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B
>>>==> >San Diego, CA 92103
>>>==> >
>>>==> >Voice: (619) 298-3396
>>>==> >Fax (619) 298-5681
>>>==> >E-mail: prc@privacyrights.org
>>>==> >Web: www.privacyrights.org
>>>==>
>>>==> .
>>>==> .
>>>==> Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>>>==> 3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B
>>>==> San Diego, CA 92103
>>>==> Phone: (619) 298-3396
>>>==> Fax: (619) 298-5681
>>>==> Email: prc@privacyrights.org
>>>==> Web: www.privacyrights.org
>>>==>
>>>==>
>>
>>.
>>Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>>3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B
>>San Diego, CA 92103
>>Voice: 619-298-3396
>>Fax: 619-298-5681
>>
>>
>
>.
>.
>.
>Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
>3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B
>San Diego, CA 92103
>
>Voice: (619) 298-3396
>Fax (619) 298-5681
>E-mail: prc@privacyrights.org
>Web: www.privacyrights.org
.
.
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B
San Diego, CA 92103
Phone: (619) 298-3396
Fax: (619) 298-5681
Email: prc@privacyrights.org
Web: www.privacyrights.org
Why didn't the government or SETI get involved?
Why didn't the in-law scientist ask any more questions at the July 4th thing?
How come hypnotism worked on the human host part of him, but the KPAKean wasn't aware of it?
Why was he so keen to talk about everything (except lightwave travel) and many other KPACeans are on earth, but we assume that none of the other aliens reveal themselves?
I saw one, I was sitting on a stoop at 307 N 3rd in Philadelphia waiting for someone just looking around at buildings and the sky and to the NW this big fireball zoomed by; looked to be about a mile away - no sound. I hoped it was a meteor, but thought it might be a small plane or a burning fuel dump from a larger plane. It got pretty low so some of them may have hit. Real quick, just like a shooting star where if your looking the wrong place or blink you'd miss it.
Actually there is yet another TLD in the works for that, .inc, which is 'possed to be _only_ for those who are Incorporated with that name.
If you categorize the future of the computer and digital industries as being at least partially carried by the momentum and power of Linux and the Open Source movement; and realize that /. is a major portal there, one can see HUGE potential. To me ./ is an aggregate of original realtime developing content, flowing in a kind of open way. "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." says it all! This particular URL branding of the /. community, /. site creators, et. al. is invaluable as it is and will shape and help dictate future status-quos and cultural norms. (We could all of course move to another URL - that might make it even more valuable as advertisers and marketers and users might feel it was back to the 'true inner circle' and loosing some trolls and wannabes, 'new' or whatever.) My point is that it is worth the most now and in the future staying and growing just as it is.
Any suggestions on training paths for MCSE's to take to get to be sub-guru level *nix profesionals. Is there anyway to tell in OpenSourcer's code has been used by Microsoft? If W2K does turn out to be a failure, do you see SP7 etc for NT4 coming out?