Re:I beg to differ with AccordianGuy's assessment
on
Dive Into Python
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Are you sure I classify your book among the "bookends"? I never made reference to any specific books.
Hey, if you got a book deal and got to write about one of your favourite programming languages, you've gone farther along the publishing trail than I have. More power to you! I'm merely saying what kind of books I like.
Clay Shirky has just posted his essay, The Possibility of Spectrum as a Public Good. It starts with mentioning that the FCC is considering opening up additional spectrum for unlicensed uses -- "the same kind of regulatory change that gave rise to Wifi" -- and points out that "The 2.4Ghz spectrum is not treated as property, with the FCC in the ungainly role of a 'No Trespassing" enforcer; instead, it is being treated as a public good, with regulations in place to require devices to be good neighbors, but with no caps or other restrictions on deployment or use."
Slashdot Mirror
...this means that Count Dooku shall be denied an escape vehicle!
Are you sure I classify your book among the "bookends"? I never made reference to any specific books.
Hey, if you got a book deal and got to write about one of your favourite programming languages, you've gone farther along the publishing trail than I have. More power to you! I'm merely saying what kind of books I like.
Clay Shirky has just posted his essay, The Possibility of Spectrum as a Public Good . It starts with mentioning that the FCC is considering opening up additional spectrum for unlicensed uses -- "the same kind of regulatory change that gave rise to Wifi" -- and points out that "The 2.4Ghz spectrum is not treated as property, with the FCC in the ungainly role of a 'No Trespassing" enforcer; instead, it is being treated as a public good, with regulations in place to require devices to be good neighbors, but with no caps or other restrictions on deployment or use."
Good reading all 'round.
Two chicks at the same time, man.