So what? They can certainly be charged and they can plead guilty because their PD is shit, and now they're on the list. Just because they shouldn't doesn't mean they aren't.
Who is this WE... I'm not part of WE. I don't want my kids NEAR a public school. Why should I be part of WE just to pay for YOUR benefit and see no benefit myself.
You benefit from an educated populace. If you want a piece of that for educating your kid, it's a reasonable thing, though.
Your side of the equation wants to strip me of a lot of things... not just cash. Why should I contribute willingly to the robbery and fleecing of me
It's called taxation.
YOUR kids have accidents with cars and drugs and alcohol, YOUR kids abuse tobacco
And your kids are perfect, right?
Seriously, teaching kids is important, but school isn't the place to learn those important things
It's not like you have a better plan. You're just bitter.
Its better paid work and runs far better chances of turning out good kids. There are plenty of parents without the time but with PLENTY of cash who would love that sort of service being offered where you live... why not do it?
As for me, I'm a developer - make more money and have less job insecurity doing my current job. I would argue that people with lots of cash and no time haven't that good a chance turning out good kids - it's spending time with your kids and demanding achievement that makes the kids good.
Socializing can be done at the mall, without forcing it to be done through age segregated classes.
Forced socialization with random people is nasty but helpful. To me that's half the point of HS these days.
If you think that full time teaching is great, you should put together a curriculum for the home student, and sell it.
Why does this have to be home schooling? Teaching kids is important - we should pay the teachers enough that they don't need a second job. Oh, and let them keep discipline - when a kid goes to the office, he should dread it.
On top of the 40-60 hours they work already? Don't you think education is worth enough to pay a decent wage for the hours worked? Or did you mean that they could quit teaching if they don't like the pay?
Sure, restricting you from selling something that is in the scope of the job while employed some place is fine, but a lot of the IP contracts demand all of the creative stuff you come up with, sometimes with the option to list exceptions.
It isn't reasonable that an employee should be able to get a job for a few months, then quit and have the employer pay them for years because of the non-compete agreement.
So make it cancellable by the employer or restrict it to some reasonable time limit. How much can the new guy learn in 3 months?
I used to listen to music on headphones all of the time to keep from being distracted, and was told that it was giving everyone the impression that I didn't want to talk to them.
Of course you don't want to talk to people when you're concentrating. why do they think it's okay to walk up to you and interrupt you when you're concentrating on someting?
Slashdot Mirror
Those who cannot behave themselves in terms of not raping, etc need to be utterly broken or killed
And if the lynch mob gets the wrong guy, that's just collateral damage.
while flashers are far above.
If you've got it, flaunt it?
why should they be? You'll just get vigilantes killing them too.
It seems, in the long run even given anonymity the rapist/child molester are 50/50 to do it one more time and get arrested for it.
Is that for sex offenses or any offenses, and how does it break down between rapists and kiddy diddlers?
No, actually, they CAN'T be charged unless they're actually committing a crime.
Your faith in the system is amusing.
So what? They can certainly be charged and they can plead guilty because their PD is shit, and now they're on the list. Just because they shouldn't doesn't mean they aren't.
Who is this WE... I'm not part of WE. I don't want my kids NEAR a public school. Why should I be part of WE just to pay for YOUR benefit and see no benefit myself.
You benefit from an educated populace. If you want a piece of that for educating your kid, it's a reasonable thing, though.
Your side of the equation wants to strip me of a lot of things... not just cash. Why should I contribute willingly to the robbery and fleecing of me
It's called taxation.
YOUR kids have accidents with cars and drugs and alcohol, YOUR kids abuse tobacco
And your kids are perfect, right?
Seriously, teaching kids is important, but school isn't the place to learn those important things
It's not like you have a better plan. You're just bitter.
Its better paid work and runs far better chances of turning out good kids. There are plenty of parents without the time but with PLENTY of cash who would love that sort of service being offered where you live... why not do it?
As for me, I'm a developer - make more money and have less job insecurity doing my current job. I would argue that people with lots of cash and no time haven't that good a chance turning out good kids - it's spending time with your kids and demanding achievement that makes the kids good.
Socializing can be done at the mall, without forcing it to be done through age segregated classes.
Forced socialization with random people is nasty but helpful. To me that's half the point of HS these days.
If you think that full time teaching is great, you should put together a curriculum for the home student, and sell it.
Why does this have to be home schooling? Teaching kids is important - we should pay the teachers enough that they don't need a second job. Oh, and let them keep discipline - when a kid goes to the office, he should dread it.
Ads are copyrighted, and the arrangement with ads and all is probably copyrighted. Replacing inline ads is likely to be actionable. Naturally, IANAL.
Yeah, part time high school teacher sounds like something to aspire to. Pay attention, we aren't talking about college.
They could work another job.
On top of the 40-60 hours they work already? Don't you think education is worth enough to pay a decent wage for the hours worked? Or did you mean that they could quit teaching if they don't like the pay?
Now, if I worked for Microsoft (as if) and left to work for Apple (yay!), an NCA would probably be enforceable.
Sure, maybe if they pay you gardening leave. Just make ure you aren't going from the Zune team to the iPod team.
Sure, restricting you from selling something that is in the scope of the job while employed some place is fine, but a lot of the IP contracts demand all of the creative stuff you come up with, sometimes with the option to list exceptions.
It isn't reasonable that an employee should be able to get a job for a few months, then quit and have the employer pay them for years because of the non-compete agreement.
So make it cancellable by the employer or restrict it to some reasonable time limit. How much can the new guy learn in 3 months?
why are you obligated to help your boss be a better boss? It's usually a good ida, but it isn't mandatory.
"Why don't you let some air out of the tyres?"
Perhaps that will reduce the load capacity too much on the tires, since your truck probably needs to lose 2-3 inches.
Sounds like an HR violation waiting to happen.
So where is this?
Wikipedia is down, so I can't link it
Perhaps it's all the work of '!!' the nefarious editor...
Not really, I was talking about Florida.
Less money spent on condoms.
I used to listen to music on headphones all of the time to keep from being distracted, and was told that it was giving everyone the impression that I didn't want to talk to them.
Of course you don't want to talk to people when you're concentrating. why do they think it's okay to walk up to you and interrupt you when you're concentrating on someting?
How do you know that Gitmo only (or even mostly) contains soldiers?
Here we're much more civilized - we don't beat on voters (much), we just remove the ones we don't like.
They're POWs, or perhaps hostages - I can't really call some poor bastard from Afghanistan that got on the wrong side of some warlord a soldier.