For me, the biggest issue of the study was that it was (as I read it) significant at the.05 level - there is a 95% chance that the study is "true." While statistically significant, I would put more value to the study if hit at the.01 level - a 99% chance that the study is "true."
Slashdot Mirror
For me, the biggest issue of the study was that it was (as I read it) significant at the .05 level - there is a 95% chance that the study is "true." While statistically significant, I would put more value to the study if hit at the .01 level - a 99% chance that the study is "true."