How do you, and those who made that “law” think that page gets onto your screen?
By storing an copying it! In your network chip’s cache. In your CPU’s cache. In your RAM. On your hard disk (browser cache!). In your graphics RAM. On your screen. In your brain. And in ever place that you talk to, about it.
Information that can not be copied, can not be proven to exist (to anyone outside of those already holding it). Simple as that. Why do people such a hard time, getting this? It is because they think that meatspace and bitspace have 100% equal rules?
Well, if I were an archivist in Britain, I’d just run a proxy in the US. And then only “archive that US proxy”.;)) There definitely is a way to make it legal.
On the other hand, of course the concept of copyright is completely absurd, and must be taken out of law. People don’t need compensation for their already released works. They have to ask for compensation when releasing them the first time. Or not. But not bitch later.
How roughly? IE definitely has nothing even remotely resembling an ad blocker. And: Can you block a specific HTML element in a page in Chrome? I doubt so.
Also, what is the point of blocking tracking pixels / web beacons, when you are using the browser of the biggest of all centralized data krakens: Google. If the Google toolbar tracks, so does Chrome.
No. Real men don’t hide behind encryption like sissies. And real man don’t use telnet, but just pipe the network stream right onto the screen, while writing packets with only the num pad (with the non-numeric keys on it configured as A-F).
Seconded. If you run something on it that tells a lot of people about your system, you will get ssh dictionary attacks, port scans, etc, 24/7. Even if it’s a small dyndns system.
Of course. Because the new technology also is getting better. And usually at a much quicker rate than the existing one, because that one is already at the end of its limits.
There often even is new technology that is still worse than the old one, because of its experimental state. But worth pursuing anyway, because of the huge potential.
I thought that was the point of a big corporation. You know, with all the white kitty stroking, iron gloves, capes with stand-up collars, minions, goatees, underground bases, etc;)
And so they keeping telling themself that if they keep playing long enough, they will win back enough to at least break even.
And that is the error in logic. Since all those games have one simple rule: The more you play, the worse are your chances for break even. The example is roulette: There is not only black and red. There also is zero. And double zero. The more you play, the more often you will get on those. The more you will lose. So as a conclusion, there is only one thing to do: Choose the amount you want to risk, bet it all in one turn, and then walk away and never ever play again. Because after that, the only winning move, is not to play. And it only gets worse.
I hope the analogy also includes this. ^^
Btw: DoubleZero would be a clever name for a cracker group.:)
A dongle, unless it’s a FPGA or custom chip actually executing game logic, does not help anything. Steinberg Cubase, an expensive program, had its entire UI encrypted, and only decrypted right before execution, by a USB dongle. Which made it slow and unresponsive. (That’s why they couldn’t encrypt the core.) Someone simply went, and managed to pipe the whole encrypted code trough the dongle. Done.
As a result, the pre-decrypted program run significantly smoother. Some people even cracked their bought version because of that. (And/or because they needed the USB port.)
Slashdot Mirror
focuses on cloud."
Dealer: Shit, that’s the best stuff you ever smoked, Bill, isn’t it? ;)
Admit it: You waited YEARS, to make that joke!
Admit it! ;)
Who needs Hamburger Earmuffs, if you can lie in a cozy... let’s just say: In Soviet Russia, hamburger eats YOU!
Oops. Sorry, I missed the typos even in the preview. ;)
.
.
.
Ok, I’ll go to bed!
God... people are DUMB...
How do you, and those who made that “law” think that page gets onto your screen?
By storing an copying it! In your network chip’s cache. In your CPU’s cache. In your RAM. On your hard disk (browser cache!). In your graphics RAM. On your screen. In your brain. And in ever place that you talk to, about it.
Information that can not be copied, can not be proven to exist (to anyone outside of those already holding it). Simple as that.
Why do people such a hard time, getting this? It is because they think that meatspace and bitspace have 100% equal rules?
Well, if I were an archivist in Britain, I’d just run a proxy in the US. And then only “archive that US proxy”. ;))
There definitely is a way to make it legal.
On the other hand, of course the concept of copyright is completely absurd, and must be taken out of law. People don’t need compensation for their already released works. They have to ask for compensation when releasing them the first time. Or not. But not bitch later.
How roughly? IE definitely has nothing even remotely resembling an ad blocker. And: Can you block a specific HTML element in a page in Chrome? I doubt so.
Also, what is the point of blocking tracking pixels / web beacons, when you are using the browser of the biggest of all centralized data krakens: Google.
If the Google toolbar tracks, so does Chrome.
No. Real men don’t hide behind encryption like sissies.
And real man don’t use telnet, but just pipe the network stream right onto the screen, while writing packets with only the num pad (with the non-numeric keys on it configured as A-F).
If we want encryption, we do it in our heads. ^^
Will they be writing angry letters to Google too? You know... those that index all their content, so it can be found in the first place?
Let them kill themselves with their delusional business model. The space and jobs will quickly be filled with something else.
Seconded. If you run something on it that tells a lot of people about your system, you will get ssh dictionary attacks, port scans, etc, 24/7. Even if it’s a small dyndns system.
...he would re-release that same statement, with:
s/cyber.?war/terrorism/i
Then we would start to get somewhere... and maybe fix more important problems.
You suggest that their work is naturally recyclable? ;)
Into what? Weapon grade nuclear material? Ebola-derived bio-weapons?
You mean similar to how your comment came freshly packed with Misunderstanding 1.0? ;)
Poseidon? Cthulhu need so lay off his Poseidon Masala! ^^
Captain Grebnedlog? Is that you?
optoelectronics
If they don’t have to be converted to electricity first, then where are the electronics in this?
A better name is “photonics”. :)
Of course. Because the new technology also is getting better. And usually at a much quicker rate than the existing one, because that one is already at the end of its limits.
There often even is new technology that is still worse than the old one, because of its experimental state. But worth pursuing anyway, because of the huge potential.
The same is true for optical circuits.
Those who can’t teach, administrate. ;)
Those who can’t administrate, manage.
And those who can’t manage, own the company.
BOTH.
The graduate knows the dirty practice. And the prof knows the theory and has the power.
And that is the best game advertisement I have seen in a long time, right there!
Honesty deserves honesty. Respect deserves respect.
(But one thing you need... in the big buy button in your games list’s detail page. ^^)
Total control of the universe!!!(?) ;)
I thought that was the point of a big corporation. ;)
You know, with all the white kitty stroking, iron gloves, capes with stand-up collars, minions, goatees, underground bases, etc
Except that the second one is never going to happen, and that in the first case, they will die in the long run.
So in other words, they are boned either way. ^^
And what do they have to do with the crackers?
But hey, I bet many crackers actually would prefer to crack it faster, so more cancer patients die... if then 4chan attitude is any indication.
And so they keeping telling themself that if they keep playing long enough, they will win back enough to at least break even.
And that is the error in logic. Since all those games have one simple rule: The more you play, the worse are your chances for break even. The example is roulette: There is not only black and red. There also is zero. And double zero.
The more you play, the more often you will get on those. The more you will lose.
So as a conclusion, there is only one thing to do: Choose the amount you want to risk, bet it all in one turn, and then walk away and never ever play again. Because after that, the only winning move, is not to play. And it only gets worse.
I hope the analogy also includes this. ^^
Btw: DoubleZero would be a clever name for a cracker group. :)
A dongle, unless it’s a FPGA or custom chip actually executing game logic, does not help anything.
Steinberg Cubase, an expensive program, had its entire UI encrypted, and only decrypted right before execution, by a USB dongle.
Which made it slow and unresponsive. (That’s why they couldn’t encrypt the core.)
Someone simply went, and managed to pipe the whole encrypted code trough the dongle.
Done.
As a result, the pre-decrypted program run significantly smoother. Some people even cracked their bought version because of that. (And/or because they needed the USB port.)