yeah, but how is is for the person themselves? what a weird view: don't run away junior or we'll have to amputate... what the heck are you talking about? Any rational thinking person would know that having all your limbs is a good thing. Not that life isn't worth living, or can't be great without them, but it is definately not a plus. Why would you try to make it that?
population does not need to be held in check- are we still believing Malthus?
Re:Influences, agendas shouldn't matter with facts
on
Rare Earth
·
· Score: 1
I agree that the scientific debate doesn't yield anything- it has been going on long enough to know that their is no "proof" that can be given that everyone will accept. However, your post basically said nothing. Evolutionary theory is not a middle ground for atheists and deists. The fact that it can be twisted to accept such different theories shows a good deal of its fallability: it is what people want it to be. It doesn't matter if evolution can allow for a god- what would the meaning of such a god be? Belief does not create. The real question is why someone who believed in a true and living God would want to tie him up inside evolution when it is such an hoax- their belief is altered by what people might think if they didn't believe the the popular theory that so many think is proven. Have questions about why I would question evolution? Try http://www.drdino.com/
Re:Influences, agendas shouldn't matter with facts
on
Rare Earth
·
· Score: 1
how is a creationist more agendized than an evolutionist? it is obvious that both parties have much to lose: one can't accept God, the other must. pointless reply.
Slashdot Mirror
yeah, but how is is for the person themselves? what a weird view: don't run away junior or we'll have to amputate... what the heck are you talking about? Any rational thinking person would know that having all your limbs is a good thing. Not that life isn't worth living, or can't be great without them, but it is definately not a plus. Why would you try to make it that?
population does not need to be held in check- are we still believing Malthus?
I agree that the scientific debate doesn't yield anything- it has been going on long enough to know that their is no "proof" that can be given that everyone will accept. However, your post basically said nothing. Evolutionary theory is not a middle ground for atheists and deists. The fact that it can be twisted to accept such different theories shows a good deal of its fallability: it is what people want it to be. It doesn't matter if evolution can allow for a god- what would the meaning of such a god be? Belief does not create. The real question is why someone who believed in a true and living God would want to tie him up inside evolution when it is such an hoax- their belief is altered by what people might think if they didn't believe the the popular theory that so many think is proven. Have questions about why I would question evolution? Try http://www.drdino.com/
how is a creationist more agendized than an evolutionist? it is obvious that both parties have much to lose: one can't accept God, the other must. pointless reply.