In the article SCO makes the claim that they "own" Unix. However, this is just the old AT&T codebase. Isn't this like claiming you "own" DOS 1.2? And therefore you want everyone who buys a copy of Windows XP to give you a big cut?
He also makes a big deal about intellectual property and fails to make the differentiation that it's someone elses property he's trying to make a buck off. No one in there right mind would just buy Sys 5 anymore.
Slashdot Mirror
In the article SCO makes the claim that they "own" Unix. However, this is just the old AT&T codebase. Isn't this like claiming you "own" DOS 1.2? And therefore you want everyone who buys a copy of Windows XP to give you a big cut? He also makes a big deal about intellectual property and fails to make the differentiation that it's someone elses property he's trying to make a buck off. No one in there right mind would just buy Sys 5 anymore.