Slashdot Mirror


User: MushMouth

MushMouth's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
761
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 761

  1. Re:OK for me, but not for you. on At Last And At Length: Lars Speaks · · Score: 2

    Remember there is a tariff paid to the recording industry for every blank tape and recorder sold. See earlier articles about tacking this same tarif on blank CDR's, and the uproar at the suggestion.

  2. Re:This is disgusting. on Open Source Leaders Speak About Napster · · Score: 1

    Linus himself chooses to license Linux under the GPL. He expects people to honor his choice. He also expects people to honor Metallica's choice to release their work under the terms which they choose. I would expect Linux to sue someone who violates the GPL with Linux (Corel's beta program). As for Stallman, he has fundimental flaws in his argument. Most musicians do NOT make enough money touring to put food on their tables. It would be nice, but it is not the case. He really pisses me off, always threatening people who look at the GPL in the wrong way, but so quickly dismising anyone else's rights to determine the terms of their work. Also he is suddenly an expert in an industry he has absolutely no experience in. Shame on him.

  3. Re:Something isn't right here on Shut Down Metallica, Not Napster · · Score: 1

    Bands that are really getting hurt, don't have the money to spend on Lawyers. I don't think that Metallica plans on breaking even here, or even profiting. They claim that they are doing it because they are fighting for the others rights to be able to do what they did. Read the article on www.sfgate.com.

  4. Re:Filenames on Metallica Wants To Ban 335,435 Napster Users · · Score: 1

    Actually you would make them all very happy since end users looking for Metallica, and Dr Dre wouldn't be able to find them either. Effectively filtering them, which is what they asked Napster to do in the first place.

  5. That successfully filters Metallica on Metallica Wants To Ban 335,435 Napster Users · · Score: 1

    Hey moron, I guess you missed a side effect of that, it would make it very difficult for end users to find Metallica songs using Napster, just what Metallica wants and asked Napster to do before filing the lawsuit, filter out Metallica from the servers.

  6. Re:Oh no! They broke the law and now they're CAUGH on Metallica Wants To Ban 335,435 Napster Users · · Score: 3
    You don't know what you are talking about....

    This is from Steve Albini, the recording engineer (don't ever call him a producer) for The Pixies, The Wedding Present, and Bush, who paid his bills for years. Steve has a sliding pay scale, he will record good poor bands for no more than joe schmoe studio (in his own state of the art studio) and charge major labels bank to record crap like Bush.

    He isn't a fan of the record industry, but he shows insight as to how much things really cost. Also the artists aren't makeing any money.

    Some of Your Friends are Already This Fucked
    by Steve Albini
    from The Baffler issue #5

    Whenever I talk to a band who are about to sign with a major label, I always
    end up thinking of them in a particular context. I imagine a trench, about
    four feet wide and five feet deep, maybe sixty yards long, filled with
    runny, decaying shit. I imagine these people, some of them good friends,
    some of them barely acquaintances, at one end of this trench. I also imagine
    a faceless industry lackey at the other end, holding a fountain pen and a
    contract waiting to be signed.

    Nobody can see what's printed on the contract. It's too far away, and
    besides, the shit stench is making everybody's eyes water. The lackey shouts
    to everybody that the first one to swim the trench gets to sign the
    contract. Everybody dives in the trench and they struggle furiously to get
    to the other end. Two people arrive simultaneously and begin wrestling
    furiously, clawing each other and dunking each other under the shit.
    Eventually, one of them capitulates, and there's only one contestant left.
    He reaches for the pen, but the Lackey says, "Actually, I think you need
    a little more development. Swim it again, please. Backstroke."

    And he does, of course.


    A&R Scouts

    Every major label involved in the hunt for new bands now has on staff a
    high-profile point man, an "A&R" rep who can present a comfortable face to
    any prospective band. The initials stand for "Artist and Repertoire,"
    because historically, the A&R staff would select artists to record music
    that they had also selected, out of an available pool of each. This is
    still the case, though not openly.

    These guys are universally young [about the same age as the bands being
    wooed], and nowadays they always have some obvious underground rock
    credibility flag they can wave. Lyle Preslar, former guitarist for Minor
    Threat, is one of them. Terry Tolkin, former NY independent booking agent
    and assistant manager at Touch and Go is one of them. Al Smith, former
    soundman at CBGB is one of them. Mike Gitter, former editor of XXX fanzine
    and contributor to Rip, Kerrang and other lowbrow rags is one of them. Many
    of the annoying turds who used to staff college radio stations are in their
    ranks as well.

    There are several reasons A&R scouts are always young. The explanation
    usually copped-to is that the scout will be "hip" to the current musical
    "scene." A more important reason is that the bands will intuitively trust
    someone they think is a peer, and who speaks fondly of the same formative
    rock and roll experiences.

    The A&R person is the first person to make contact with the band, and as
    such is the first person to promise them the moon. Who better to promise
    them the moon than an idealistic young Turk who expects to be calling the
    shots in a few years, and who has had no previous experience with a big
    record company. Hell, he's as naive as the band he's duping. When he tells
    them no one will interfere in their creative process, he probably even
    believes it.

    When he sits down with the band for the first time, over a plate of angel
    hair pasta, he can tell them with all sincerity that when they sign with
    company X, they're really signing with him and he's on their side. Remember
    that great, gig I saw you at in '85? Didn't we have a blast.

    By now all rock bands are wise enough to be suspicious of music industry
    scum. There is a pervasive caricature in popular culture of a portly, middle
    aged ex-hipster talking a mile-a-minute, using outdated jargon and calling
    everybody "baby." After meeting "their" A&R guy, the band will say to
    themselves and everyone else, "He's not like a record company guy at all!
    He's like one of us." And they will be right. That's one of the reasons he
    was hired.

    These A&R guys are not allowed to write contracts. What they do is present
    the band with a letter of intent, or "deal memo," which loosely states some
    terms, and affirms that the band will sign with the label once a contract
    has been agreed on.

    The spookiest thing about this harmless sounding little "memo," is that it
    is, for all legal purposes, a binding document. That is, once the band sign
    it, they are under obligation to conclude a deal with the label. If the
    label presents them with a contract that the band don't want to sign, all
    the label has to do is wait. There are a hundred other bands willing to
    sign the exact same contract, so the label is in a position of strength.

    These letters never have any term of expiration, so the band remain bound
    by the deal memo until a contract is signed, no matter how long that takes.
    The band cannot sign to another label or even put out its own material
    unless they are released from their agreement, which never happens. Make
    no mistake about it: once a band has signed a letter of intent, they will
    either eventually sign a contract that suits the label or they will be
    destroyed.

    One of my favorite bands was held hostage for the better part of two years
    by a slick young "He's not like a label guy at all,' A&R rep, on the basis
    of such a deal memo. He had failed to come through on any of his promises
    (something he did with similar effect to another well-known band), and so
    the band wanted out. Another label expressed interest, but when the A&R
    man was asked to release the band, he said he would need money or points,
    or possibly both, before he would consider it.

    The new label was afraid the price would be too dear, and they said no
    thanks. On the cusp of making their signature album, an excellent band,
    humiliated, broke up from the stress and the many months of inactivity.


    There's This Band

    There's this band. They're pretty ordinary, but they're also pretty good,
    so they've attracted some attention. They're signed to a moderate-sized
    "independent" label owned by a distribution company, and they have another
    two albums owed to the label.

    They're a little ambitious. They'd like to get signed by a major label so
    they can have some security-you know, get some good equipment, tour in a
    proper tour bus-nothing fancy, just a little reward for all the hard work.

    To that end, they got a manager. He knows some of the label guys, and he
    can shop their next project to all the right people. He takes his cut,
    sure, but it's only 15%, and if he can get them signed then it's money well
    spent. Anyway, it doesn't cost them any thing if it doesn't work. 15% of
    nothing isn't much!

    One day an A&R scout calls them, says he's "been following them for a while
    now," and when their manager mentioned them to him, it just "clicked."
    Would they like to meet with him about the possibility of working out a
    deal with his label? Wow. Big Break time.

    They meet the guy, and y'know what-he's not what they expected from a label
    guy. He's young and dresses pretty much like the band does. He knows all
    their favorite bands. He's like one of them. He tells them he wants to go
    to bat for them, to try to get them everything they want. He says anything
    is possible with the right attitude. They conclude the evening by taking
    home a copy of a deal memo they wrote out and signed on the spot.

    The A&R guy was full of great ideas, even talked about using a name
    producer. Butch Vig is out of the question-he wants 100 g's and three
    points, but they can get Don Fleming for $30,000 plus three points. Even
    that's a little steep, so maybe they'll go with that guy who used to be in
    David Letterman's band. He only wants three points. Or they can have just
    anybody record it [like Warton Tiers, maybe-cost you 5 or 10 grand] and
    have Andy Wallace remix it for 4 grand a track plus 2 points. It was a lot
    to think about.

    Well, they like this guy and they trust him. Besides, they already signed
    the deal memo. He must have been serious about wanting them to sign. They
    break the news to their current label, and the label manager says he wants
    them to succeed, so they have his blessing. He will need to be compensated,
    of course, for the remaining albums left on their contract, but he'll work
    it out with the label himself. Sub Pop made millions from selling off
    Nirvana, and Twin Tone hasn't done bad either: 50 grand for the Babes and
    60 grand for the Poster Children-without having to sell a single additional
    record. It'll be something modest. The new label doesn't mind, so long as
    it's recoupable out of royalties.

    Well, they get the final contract, and it's not quite what they expected.
    They figure it's better to be safe than sorry and they turn it over to a
    lawyer-one who says he's experienced in entertainment law-and he hammers
    out a few bugs. They're still not sure about it, but the lawyer says he's
    seen a lot of contracts, and theirs is pretty good. They'll be getting a
    great royalty: 13% [less a 10% packaging deduction]. Wasn't it Buffalo Tom
    that were only getting 12% less 10? Whatever.

    The old label only wants 50 grand, and no points. Hell, Sub Pop got 3 points
    when they let Nirvana go. They're signed for four years, with options on
    each year, for a total of over a million dollars! That's a lot of money in
    any man's English. The first year's advance alone is $250,000. Just think
    about it, a quarter-million, just for being in a rock band!

    Their manager thinks it's a great deal, especially the large advance.
    Besides, he knows a publishing company that will take the band on if they
    get signed, and even give them an advance of 20 grand, so they'll be making
    that money too. The manager says publishing is pretty mysterious, and nobody
    really knows where all the money comes from, but the lawyer can look that
    contract over too. Hell, it's free money.

    Their booking agent is excited about the band signing to a major. He says
    they can maybe average $1,000 or $2,000 a night from now on. That's enough
    to justify a five week tour, and with tour support, they can use a proper
    crew, buy some good equipment and even get a tour bus! Buses are pretty
    expensive, but if you figure in the price of a hotel room for everybody in
    the band and crew, they're actually about the same cost. Some bands (like
    Therapy? and Sloan and Stereolab) use buses on their tours even when they're
    getting paid only a couple hundred bucks a night, and this tour should earn
    at least a grand or two every night. It'll be worth it. The band will be
    more comfortable and will play better.

    The agent says a band on a major label can get a merchandising company to
    pay them an advance on T-shirt sales! Ridiculous! There's a gold mine here!
    The lawyer should look over the merchandising contract, just to be safe.

    They get drunk at the signing party. Polaroids are taken and everybody
    looks thrilled. The label picked them up in a limo.

    They decided to go with the producer who used to be in Letterman's band.
    He had these technicians come in and tune the drums for them and tweak
    their amps and guitars. He had a guy bring in a slew of expensive old
    vintage microphones. Boy, were they "warm." He even had a guy come in and
    check the phase of all the equipment in the control room! Boy, was he
    professional. He used a bunch of equipment on them and by the end of it,
    they all agreed that it sounded very "punchy," yet "warm."

    All that hard work paid off. With the help of a video, the album went like
    hotcakes! They sold a quarter million copies!

    Here is the math that will explain just how fucked they are:

    These figures are representative of amounts that appear in record contracts
    daily. There's no need to skew the figures to make the scenario look bad,
    since real-life examples more than abound. Income is underlined, expenses
    are not.

    Advance: $250,000
    Manager's cut: $37,500
    Legal fees: $10,000

    Recording Budget: $150,000
    Producer's advance: $50,000
    Studio fee: $52,500
    Drum, Amp, Mic and Phase "Doctors": $3,000
    Recording tape: $8,000
    Equipment rental: $5,000
    Cartage and Transportation: $5,000
    Lodgings while in studio: $10,000
    Catering: $3,000
    Mastering: $10,000
    Tape copies, reference CDs, shipping tapes, misc. expenses: $2,000

    Video budget: $30,000
    Cameras: $8,000
    Crew: $5,000
    Processing and transfers: $3,000
    Offline: $2,000
    Online editing: $3,000
    Catering: $1,000
    Stage and construction: $3,000
    Copies, couriers, transportation: $2,000
    Director's fee: $3,000

    Album Artwork: $5,000
    Promotional photo shoot and duplication: $2,000

    Band fund: $15,000
    New fancy professional drum kit: $5,000
    New fancy professional guitars (2): $3,000
    New fancy professional guitar amp rigs (2): $4,000
    New fancy potato-shaped bass guitar: $1,000
    New fancy rack of lights bass amp: $1,000
    Rehearsal space rental: $500

    Big blowout party for their friends: $500

    Tour expense (5 weeks): $50,875
    Bus: $25,000
    Crew (3): $7,500
    Food and per diems: $7,875
    Fuel: $3,000
    Consumable supplies: $3,500
    Wardrobe: $1,000
    Promotion: $3,000

    Tour gross income: $50,000
    Agent s cut: $7,500
    Manager's cut: $7,500

    Merchandising advance: $20,000
    Manager's cut: $3,000
    Lawyer's fee: $1,000

    Publishing advance: $20,000
    Manager's cut: $3,000
    Lawyer's fee: $1,000

    Record sales: 250,000 @ $12 = $3,000,000 gross retail revenue Royalty (13%
    of 90% of retail): $351,000
    Less advance: $250,000
    Producer's points: (3% less $50,000 advance) $40,000
    Promotional budget: $25,000
    Recoupable buyout from previous label: $50,000
    Net royalty: (-$14,000)

    Record company income:
    Record wholesale price $6.50 x 250,000 = $1,625,000 gross income
    Artist Royalties: $351,000
    Deficit from royalties: $14,000
    Manufacturing, packaging and distribution @ $2.20 per record: $550,000
    Gross profit: $710,000

    The Balance Sheet: This is how much each player got paid at the end of the
    game.

    Record company: $710,000
    Producer: $90,000
    Manager: $51,000
    Studio: $52,500
    Previous label: $50,000
    Agent: $7,500
    Lawyer: $12,000
    Band member net income each: $4,031.25


    The band is now 1/4 of the way through its contract, has made the music
    industry more than 3 million dollars richer, but is in the hole $14,000 on
    royalties. The band members have each earned about 1/3 as much as they
    would working at a 7-11, but they got to ride in a tour bus for a month.

    The next album will be about the same, except that the record company will
    insist they spend more time and money on it. Since the previous one never
    "recouped," the band will have no leverage, and will oblige.

    The next tour will be about the same, except the merchandising advance will
    have already been paid, and the band, strangely enough, won't have earned
    any royalties from their t-shirts yet. Maybe the T-shirt guys have figured
    out how to count money like record company guys.

    Some of your friends are probably already this fucked.

    (c) 1999 [indiecentre]

  7. Re:Just make the RIGHT argument on Metallica Wants To Ban 335,435 Napster Users · · Score: 1
    Maybe you should look at who is causing this problem, NAPSTER. If they did the right thing... publish IP addresses, filter copywrited material, generally play the game that the record companies want or at least some of the game, then you wouldn't have any problem. The truth is that Napster could care less about you, because Napster wouldn't have many users if they didn't turn a blind eye on copywrite abuses. Metallica spent their own money to find who exactly was distributing their music, and sent the list to Napster, good for them. Did they send YOUR name in? They are showing Napster how to play. Metallica has no problem with you distributing your work how ever you want to, all they want is their work to be distributed under their rules. The asked Napster before any lawsuit appeared to filter their catalog, Napster refused, so Metallica responded the only way they could to mantain their rights. You want someone to blame, look at Napster.

    BTW what is the net worth of the guy who founded Napster? Talk about being filthy rich, he has more than 99% of all the Major label artists who are complaining.

  8. Re:Pffffft on Will This Genie Ever Go Back In The Bottle? · · Score: 1

    They don't have to, all they have to do is win a suit against a a single ISP (or other provider University, etc), then the ISP's will filter out the master DB's quickly and quitely.

  9. Re:napster is screwed on MP3.com Loses In Court · · Score: 1

    It's really easy to shut off Napster, filter out it's db servers subnet from their routers. You can run it all you want, but you won't ever find where any of the files live. I assume that the administrators of these institutions have actually done it, since they have been bitching about the bandwidth explosion already.

  10. Re:My Defense of Napster on Metallica's "Justice" And Napster · · Score: 1
    This is funny when someone violates the GPL, nobody is hurt or "loses" anything, yet the violator is boycotted, called a thief, e-mail bombed......

    Stop with the double standard here, Metallica makes music, and give you terms to use it and listen to it, you don't like those terms don't listen to their music.

    What is going to end up happening is that routers on all the ISP's (who will be sued, and rightly so) are going to shut off napster, and any sort of clone.

    Napster could do the right thing, but they are choosing not to play the game by the rules that the artist's who make the music set.

  11. Re:Metallica Chat... on Metallica's "Justice" And Napster · · Score: 1

    That is why they are sueing the Universities, I'm sure it will move on to the ISP's, which also have the power of killing napster in their routers.

  12. High Tech Heretic on Interview: Steve Wozniak Unbound · · Score: 1

    More Specifically it is Titled "High Tech Heretic: why computers don't belong in the classroom and other reflections of a computer contrarian"

  13. Re:References to Salon.com on The Corporate Lame Name Game · · Score: 1
    Because you get....
    • the news 1-3 days earlier by reading the other sites.
    • a wider representation of the views
    • news unincumbered with /.'s potentially un-informed editorializing
    • generally better fact checking, and certainly better editorial corrections.

    that is just the beginning
  14. Re:Hmmm...Apple's famous commercial on Apple Ending Engineering Credits in Products · · Score: 1

    Yeah you start your own company and name it after yourself, if is that big a deal. If not, like most things aren't that big a deal in software develoment it has generally all been done before, you get paid by your employer. If I were the employer, and someone demanded credits for things they do on my time and my equiptment, I would show them where the door is so they can start their own company.

  15. Union rules on Apple Ending Engineering Credits in Products · · Score: 1

    If the engineers unionized and made credits part of their contract like all of the movie industry they could have their credits. Do you think only the people in the credits work on the movie? No its the people who have getting credit part of their contract are on the credits, many more people work on the film than are credited.
    BTW don't weep over the engineers loosing their credits, as an engineer in the SFBay area, I can safely say that it is an employee's market, don't like it, it only takes a second to find a new job. Credits are simply gravy, I doubt that any of the engineers base their employment on credits.

  16. Re:Odd thing about What's Related on Transmeta Details Continue to Unravel · · Score: 1
    Use the real Alexa service for the following links

    • Intel
    • Sun Microsystems
    • Rise Technology- Microprocessor, Processor, Chips, Cpu, Mp6
    • RedHat Linux
    • Microsoft Corporation
    • AMD
    • Zork
    • GNU Project
    • Cyrix
    • Electronic Freedom Foundation
  17. Re:The Onion on Blue-Green Algae Announces IPO · · Score: 1

    Interesting, I read it Monday.
    You guys should really get out more, maybe read more informed and diverse views than those that are being peddled here.

    "News in the Slashdot Age" has a tendency to be either A.) repackaged, or B.) uninformed. If you read the primary sources more you will come to understand this.
    On the plus side the server seems to be down a lot less, which is good since this site was a terrible example of an "Open Source Site", with extended downtimes almost daily.

  18. Yesterday's news today on Blue-Green Algae Announces IPO · · Score: 1

    Thank you Slashdot, always keeping us so up to date.

    Seriously, can you guys try to keep the postings actually NEW?

  19. Re:Not this nonsense again on RISC vs. CISC in the post-RISC era · · Score: 1

    AltiVect is a SIMD unit connected to the PPC it is more like a separate processor
    for more information about AltiVec read http://www.mackido.com/Hardware/A ltiVecVsKNI.html

  20. MacKido rebuts...... on RISC vs. CISC in the post-RISC era · · Score: 1
  21. Slashdot is worse than Drudge on Apple & The G4 Order Truth · · Score: 2

    Are you kidding? The USB2 story stated "Faster than firewire" Something that was obviously wrong to anyone who knew anything about Firewire. This was NEVER corrected in the story. At least Drudge corrects his stories, slashdot rarely does unless it is a Linux story.

  22. Re:And 3.2 Gbps is even sweeter on USB2 Specs Are In · · Score: 1

    "because they are not *true* Firewire drives. They are aftermarket modifications to IDE or SCSI hard drives."

    "This last shows a profound mis-understanding of the difference between IDE and SCSI drives"

    You misread the statement. current IEE1394 drives are complete IDE or SCSI drives with an IDE<->IEEE1394 or a SCSI<->IEEE1394 adapters. Yes the platters on all drives are the same, but the electronics are different. Soon there will be no need for the adapters, IEEE1394 will interface directly to the drive Mechanism.

  23. Please update top level story on USB2 Specs Are In · · Score: 1

    Since IEEE 1394 is alread spec'd to 1.2 Gb you should make that clear in the top level story. The story as it reads is misleading to the point of compromised journalist integrity.

  24. Re:First DVD slot-loader? on New iMac Rolled Out · · Score: 1

    I've had one for over a year in my home-built PC...

    You market that machine? Didn't think so! Any other System manufacturer put a slot loading DVD into there systems?

  25. Crashed your server? on Streaming Server for Linux · · Score: 1

    What OS were you running?