Surely the people who DB should be sueing are those that host the content, rather than those which point at it? - But then we all know how it is with caching these days? The content could probably be pulled yet the mirros/ caches would be lting around for a while.
As for it being quick, well DB suffered a lot of bad press from a 'couple' (definately one really bad accident that I remember) of accidents and they are the target for green activists on a yearly basis so... I expect from a corporate view they have to be seen to be protecting their customers. A court case is probably far cheaper than upgrading the carriages on the railway.
Surely the people who DB should be sueing are those that host the content, rather than those which point at it? - But then we all know how it is with caching these days? The content could probably be pulled yet the mirros/ caches would be lting around for a while.
... I expect from a corporate view they have to be seen to be protecting their customers. A court case is probably far cheaper than upgrading the carriages on the railway.
As for it being quick, well DB suffered a lot of bad press from a 'couple' (definately one really bad accident that I remember) of accidents and they are the target for green activists on a yearly basis so
Mutations that can learn? This is all very sinister....