you should see waydowntown
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waydowntown It is exactly that concept only in Calgary. They have a network of overhead pathways, connecting the downtown core. Or so I hear.
so technically the English translation of the bible never uses the word "species", it refers to 2 of every "kind" of animal. Creationists have this elaborate world constructed where they have divided the world animals into a few thousand kinds of animals. and use a hyper-evolution thing to explain the variety of species we have now. it is really very strange.
based on GP post he is worried about having a party the meets his views. Proportional systems cause more parties to form. These parties have different or slightly different views. So one might assume that having more parties would give a larger chance that one of them would meet his views.
oh and The "America electoral system" was designed over 200 years ago there have been great advances in communication since then. Maybe you might want to look at a system implemented by modern country this century.
The Allies forced Germany into an MMP system after WW2
New Zealand switched to MMP just recently.
Japan has a mixed system it was forced into after WW2
there are also some fun experiments in Democracy just north of your border
* citizensassembly.bc.ca
* citizensassembly.gov.on.ca
If they had been here the last few hundred millions years, there would probably be lots of obvious signs of industrial work visible in any telescope. er..ummm Saturn's Rings?
Jesus H. Vishnu! Do I have to do all the thinking?
Ok, sure so the same energy levels are reached in cosmic rays. But does that really imply the the same forms of matter are created in the collisions? Its an honest question I have never looked at the math that would be required. Aren't there other things involved like Angle of Impact, rate of collisions, type of original matter, length of the experiment.... Are these black holes predicted to form from cosmic rays? Have these black holes ever actually been detected? These are questions that should be asked, and I am sure they have been answered by some body. But me and the general population, have never been given adequate answers.
I am sure the particle physics community has. but I have not.
Stephen Hawking made about black holes disintegrating and vanishing. OK tangent time. I have a BS in Physics,and never took the optional 4th year general relativity course at my university. But, I do have some interest in this area, and I have some limited passing knowledge of this theory.
Now, that new fangled Particle accelerator is supposed to be able to create black holes. And Baby Black holes are supposed to "evaporate" with hawking radiation. But like, what if they don't? what if hawking is wrong? what if the earth slowly gets sucked into the black hole? It seems to me like a rather large risk to be taking. don't you think?
I love fuse it makes so many things so much easier. mainly I use "sshfs". but the biggest problem I have is the same problem I have with KDE-IOSlaves. is that you can't really chain them
It makes it easy to Open a Zip/Rar file as a folder, and it makes it easy to treat an FTP server as a folder. but what about a Zip File on an FTP server?
I just wish there was some easy way to allow the FTP/SSH file systems to recognize that a Zip File as folder.
or chain to Zip with Encryption. or Encryption with Subversion. all at the file system level. any way thats my rant, but the FUSE effort is brilliant in general.
you are not comprehending my full argument. I will not send the "things" in my apartment you desire. Because I do not believe that you have the same level of need for them as I do. If I was sure :
* you had a greater need for it then me
* would be able to put the "things" to better use
* you would not be better served by obtaining similar things from an alternate source. Then, I would send you my things. Think of life as a giant math equation "Total Happiness" = Sum ("Individual Happiness") I would like to maximize "Total Happiness", even if it means reducing my happiness, or other peoples. The terms in this giant equation not independent and have non linear relationships that are not always clear. It is usually not clear what the best course of action is. However I stand by my original assertion that it can in some cases be moral to take things that don't "belong" to you.
But as for medical coverage you are comparing the USA now with the USA of the past which is fine in its place but I think The comparison of USA now vs Rest of World Now is much better.
and as for infant mortality, you are comparing to the "developed world" not the "entire world".
an I totally agree with your last little bit there. but any ideas on how to fix it?
1. if by fast growing you refer to GDP growth then, yes. But you refer to "Rich" and "poor", and I would by no means say the china is richer today then it was 5 years ago. Its natural resources have been stripped away and not replaced, and there worth has not been replaced with equivalent amount of alternative resources of equal value.
but yes, it will it is still incentive based the incentive is justed heavily weighted to the low income. but at every income level there is still some incentive. as earning more will still get you more.
I never said who makes the judgment. The judgment is the hard part of the moral dilemma.
As for me sending you stuff.
I don't own a TV, as I Gave it away several years ago. I don't think you want my computer as it was new in 1999, and was picked up by me 3rd hand. as for electronics I have very little that I don't require to maintain basic life functions, microwave, toaster oven from the 1980's. As for trinkets I have many I do not need which clutter up my apartment I would love to get rid of, however I would feel guilty about throwing them out as I feel somebody may some day find some use for them. which is less likely if they are in landfill.
And guess what I am one of the 2% richest people on the planet.
he does not steal in the traditional sense. He basically lives of the waste of society. "dumpster diving", "Plate Diving", hitch hiking.
I respect his moral choice, and I would say that in my opinion even shoplifting is not immoral. in spite of what you have been taught in school. I is not wrong to take something from somebody, when that person has no need for it.
if is a requirement of some systems. "Pure capitalism" would be an example of one. I do not advocate for pure capitalism, I am just sure that capitalism does require rich and poor
perhaps. and perhaps they are only better of for a short period of time, temporary relief while the "manufacturing company" pumps money into the economy they pup a much greater amount of natural resources out of the country. and pollute the land making it less productive for future generations.
Slashdot Mirror
metrics? you mean the editors didn't sit around a table saying, "Hey remember my old NES, that was cool"..."It needs to go in."
you should see waydowntown
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waydowntown
It is exactly that concept only in Calgary.
They have a network of overhead pathways, connecting the downtown core.
Or so I hear.
so technically the English translation of the bible never uses the word "species", it refers to 2 of every "kind" of animal.
Creationists have this elaborate world constructed where they have divided the world animals into a few thousand kinds of animals. and use a hyper-evolution thing to explain the variety of species we have now.
it is really very strange.
what does proportionality "Not" help with?
based on GP post he is worried about having a party the meets his views. Proportional systems cause more parties to form. These parties have different or slightly different views. So one might assume that having more parties would give a larger chance that one of them would meet his views.
oh and
The "America electoral system" was designed over 200 years ago there have been great advances in communication since then. Maybe you might want to look at a system implemented by modern country this century.
The Allies forced Germany into an MMP system after WW2
New Zealand switched to MMP just recently.
Japan has a mixed system it was forced into after WW2
there are also some fun experiments in Democracy just north of your border
* citizensassembly.bc.ca
* citizensassembly.gov.on.ca
in Canada We do it this way
* http://edibleballot.tao.ca/
I am very close to taking salt and pepper into the voting booth with me.
These people might be to your liking.
* http://edibleballot.tao.ca/
Jesus H. Vishnu! Do I have to do all the thinking?
Ok, sure so the same energy levels are reached in cosmic rays.
But does that really imply the the same forms of matter are created in the collisions?
Its an honest question I have never looked at the math that would be required.
Aren't there other things involved like Angle of Impact, rate of collisions, type of original matter, length of the experiment....
Are these black holes predicted to form from cosmic rays?
Have these black holes ever actually been detected?
These are questions that should be asked, and I am sure they have been answered by some body.
But me and the general population, have never been given adequate answers.
I am sure the particle physics community has. but I have not.
best way to deal with windows vista EVER!
Now, that new fangled Particle accelerator is supposed to be able to create black holes.
And Baby Black holes are supposed to "evaporate" with hawking radiation.
But like, what if they don't? what if hawking is wrong?
what if the earth slowly gets sucked into the black hole?
It seems to me like a rather large risk to be taking.
don't you think?
you are obviously not from the east coast.
So if I post on a forum website.
I am still the "author" of that post, I may not be the webmaster/copyright holder, but I am most likely the author.
I don't ever remember even once giving consent to have google ads put on pages with my posts.
there are several solutions to this problem.
Create a Fat32 partition and save your documents there.
or save your documents in Linux and use Explore2fs
http://www.chrysocome.net/explore2fs
I think there are better options available now, but these are the only ones I have ever used. back when I still cared about booting windows.
I love fuse it makes so many things so much easier.
mainly I use "sshfs". but the biggest problem I have is the same problem I have with KDE-IOSlaves.
is that you can't really chain them
It makes it easy to Open a Zip/Rar file as a folder, and it makes it easy to treat an FTP server as a folder. but what about a Zip File on an FTP server?
I just wish there was some easy way to allow the FTP/SSH file systems to recognize that a Zip File as folder.
or chain to Zip with Encryption.
or Encryption with Subversion.
all at the file system level.
any way thats my rant, but the FUSE effort is brilliant in general.
you are not comprehending my full argument.
I will not send the "things" in my apartment you desire.
Because I do not believe that you have the same level of need for them as I do.
If I was sure :
* you had a greater need for it then me
* would be able to put the "things" to better use
* you would not be better served by obtaining similar things from an alternate source.
Then, I would send you my things.
Think of life as a giant math equation
"Total Happiness" = Sum ("Individual Happiness")
I would like to maximize "Total Happiness", even if it means reducing my happiness, or other peoples. The terms in this giant equation not independent and have non linear relationships that are not always clear. It is usually not clear what the best course of action is. However I stand by my original assertion that it can in some cases be moral to take things that don't "belong" to you.
I accept your first point about the politicians.
But as for medical coverage you are comparing the USA now with the USA of the past which is fine in its place but I think The comparison of USA now vs Rest of World Now is much better.
and as for infant mortality, you are comparing to the "developed world" not the "entire world".
an I totally agree with your last little bit there. but any ideas on how to fix it?
yes, and thanks.
could you provide a link to the article also?
thanks.
1. if by fast growing you refer to GDP growth then, yes. But you refer to "Rich" and "poor", and I would by no means say the china is richer today then it was 5 years ago. Its natural resources have been stripped away and not replaced, and there worth has not been replaced with equivalent amount of alternative resources of equal value.
2. I agree they are stagnating
I'm not sure if your sarcastic.
but yes, it will it is still incentive based the incentive is justed heavily weighted to the low income.
but at every income level there is still some incentive. as earning more will still get you more.
I never said who makes the judgment. The judgment is the hard part of the moral dilemma.
As for me sending you stuff.
I don't own a TV, as I Gave it away several years ago.
I don't think you want my computer as it was new in 1999, and was picked up by me 3rd hand.
as for electronics I have very little that I don't require to maintain basic life functions, microwave, toaster oven from the 1980's.
As for trinkets I have many I do not need which clutter up my apartment I would love to get rid of, however I would feel guilty about throwing them out as I feel somebody may some day find some use for them.
which is less likely if they are in landfill.
And guess what I am one of the 2% richest people on the planet.
he does not steal in the traditional sense.
He basically lives of the waste of society.
"dumpster diving", "Plate Diving", hitch hiking.
I respect his moral choice, and I would say that in my opinion even shoplifting is not immoral.
in spite of what you have been taught in school. I is not wrong to take something from somebody, when that person has no need for it.
"More people own their own homes"
really, and do they do this on $2 a day income?
if is a requirement of some systems. "Pure capitalism" would be an example of one.
I do not advocate for pure capitalism, I am just sure that capitalism does require rich and poor
perhaps.
and perhaps they are only better of for a short period of time, temporary relief while the "manufacturing company" pumps money into the economy they pup a much greater amount of natural resources out of the country. and pollute the land making it less productive for future generations.
perhaps.