Umm no. Have you ever seen the power of the math package on LaTeX? I can create horrendously complicated expressions? HTML? You probably mean Math ML - this depends on browser support, and, (you guessed it), rendering depends on the browser.
That's the point I was making. If you want ugly maths, then HTML is the way to go (I've never seen a pretty MathML output) -- it does it far better than LaTeX could.
Slashdot Mirror
If anyone wants a rough idea of the reliability of that site, they only need to compare its page on the BBC to the one on Fox: http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=4&x_outlet=15. Can't say I was surprised
Umm no. Have you ever seen the power of the math package on LaTeX? I can create horrendously complicated expressions? HTML? You probably mean Math ML - this depends on browser support, and, (you guessed it), rendering depends on the browser.
That's the point I was making. If you want ugly maths, then HTML is the way to go (I've never seen a pretty MathML output) -- it does it far better than LaTeX could.
If it's based on HTML it can do horrendously-ugly-maths much better than LaTeX.
Brainfuck
The darkest parts making up something like 90% of the surface area...