The claim that creative people can't lack imagination when it comes to how to fund utilizing their skills seems to indicate a lack of understanding of how creativity works. Creative people are creative in small zones of creativity. There is a wide field in which to be creative and people are creative in relatively small patches of it.
Big things are not the only things that creative skills can be used on and there are other ways to raise funds than the way it is done now. One way is to crowdfund things up front.
I suppose this is completely arbitrary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
If they can't eventually find a way to practice their skills under the way I want things, it is due to their own lack of imagination and not a fault of my system itself.
How is that not the case? And so what if I am imposing my choice on everyone else. That's what reality is, people's choices being imposed on everyone else.
Well then, there is no solution, so who cares. Harm gets done no matter how you slice it. I didn't make this about authoritarianism, so I can care less about whether it happens to be authoritarianism. No matter what you do, someone gets harmed.
This is not about specific people. This is about what rules I believe all people will be better off under. Rules deciding and not people is what makes something not authoritarian.
Nothing is 100% reliable and if you want to find out something reliably the right way to go about it is to find better facts, not just merely claim because you happen to sometimes get them wrong any given fact is wrong.
I'm objecting to the means by which they are given that choice. If that choice is unabailable without that means, then so what? There will be other choices. There is nothing that says that one set of choices are better than another.
It is not wrong for people not to be rewarded for their work. It is only wrong when two parties have agreed in advance what an exchange of work for reward will be and the party agreeing to the reward doesn't pay up.
Because blockbusters can be made, it puts pressure on the market for lesser works. When people prefer to spend all of their money on higher priced entertainment, they don't have it to spend on lesser works.
The majority of people you have met save a little, get promoted a little higher, find slightly better jobs, got married which improved their lives a little, had kids which improved their lives a little, lived in apartments and bought houses because shelter is an absolute necessity, purchased cars because transportation is also essential and slightly better cars.
Slashdot Mirror
The claim that creative people can't lack imagination when it comes to how to fund utilizing their skills seems to indicate a lack of understanding of how creativity works. Creative people are creative in small zones of creativity. There is a wide field in which to be creative and people are creative in relatively small patches of it.
Big things are not the only things that creative skills can be used on and there are other ways to raise funds than the way it is done now. One way is to crowdfund things up front.
I suppose this is completely arbitrary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Well, now we are on Windows version 10. At this rate we'll be eventually at Windows version . 000...0001
If they can't eventually find a way to practice their skills under the way I want things, it is due to their own lack of imagination and not a fault of my system itself.
How is that not the case? And so what if I am imposing my choice on everyone else. That's what reality is, people's choices being imposed on everyone else.
What is "permanent" harm. I know that if you cut a limb off it doesn't really grow back, but what does permanent mean in this case?
Why should I apologize for merely changing who gets harmed?
And nothing you have said makes this not a matter of principle.
Well then, there is no solution, so who cares. Harm gets done no matter how you slice it. I didn't make this about authoritarianism, so I can care less about whether it happens to be authoritarianism. No matter what you do, someone gets harmed.
This is not about specific people. This is about what rules I believe all people will be better off under. Rules deciding and not people is what makes something not authoritarian.
Nothing is 100% reliable and if you want to find out something reliably the right way to go about it is to find better facts, not just merely claim because you happen to sometimes get them wrong any given fact is wrong.
It reads "I invented e-mail, and all I got was this stupid T-Shirt!"
No, we just need IDE's and complilers for current ones that enforce certain constraints.
Yeah, It's called comparing what is to what could be.
I'm objecting to the means by which they are given that choice. If that choice is unabailable without that means, then so what? There will be other choices. There is nothing that says that one set of choices are better than another.
There's no such thing as a proper president. Oh wait, I didn't read the whole thing. My bad.
As far as I understand, pretty much anyone who wants a Library of Congress number can get one.
That's neither here nor there.
It is not wrong for people not to be rewarded for their work. It is only wrong when two parties have agreed in advance what an exchange of work for reward will be and the party agreeing to the reward doesn't pay up.
No, you are confusing terms dictated by one party, with descriptions of how markets work.
Because blockbusters can be made, it puts pressure on the market for lesser works. When people prefer to spend all of their money on higher priced entertainment, they don't have it to spend on lesser works.
To mimic Kevin Flynn from Tron, distortion is simply a harsh term for market forces you disapprove of.
The majority of people you have met save a little, get promoted a little higher, find slightly better jobs, got married which improved their lives a little, had kids which improved their lives a little, lived in apartments and bought houses because shelter is an absolute necessity, purchased cars because transportation is also essential and slightly better cars.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... I prefer teaching Kopimism instead.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Sometimes it's a matter of faith.