Slashdot Mirror


User: Profane+MuthaFucka

Profane+MuthaFucka's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,995
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,995

  1. Re:Her Constituent Status Is Only Part of It on Florida Congressman Wants Blogging Critic Fined, Jailed · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Bill Clinton was no liberal. If you think he was, then I apologize that you were not properly educated.

  2. Re:Her Constituent Status Is Only Part of It on Florida Congressman Wants Blogging Critic Fined, Jailed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's the kind of thing a drunk guys says at a party to try to appear insightful. Actually, it's not. It's just plain stupid. A lack of diverse choice in political parties is not the same thing as having two equivalent choices.

  3. Re:Her Constituent Status Is Only Part of It on Florida Congressman Wants Blogging Critic Fined, Jailed · · Score: -1, Troll

    I too would like to apologize to all the dead people. I am sorry that I let Republicans kill you by depriving you of health care, and your income. I am sorry that so many stood by while Republicans cozied up to big business, allowing them to send your jobs our of the country, and helping them to smash your unions.

    I'm sorry that Republicans are such cunts, and that we've done little to point out what huge cunts they are. We'll do better in the future.

    It's about time that more people started saying things like this. It's our nation, and our world, on the line here.

  4. Re:Herein lies the answer on Poorer Children More Likely To Get Antipsychotics · · Score: 1

    If you could be more specific about your objections, that would help.

  5. Re:It must be true! on Dark Matter Particles May Have Been Detected · · Score: 1

    That's not the argument, nor the summary.

    The scientists are not right because they are scientists with white lab coat. The scientists are right because their successive theories of the nature of the universe are converging upon the actual nature of the universe.

  6. Re:Herein lies the answer on Poorer Children More Likely To Get Antipsychotics · · Score: 1

    But what specifically are you objecting to?

  7. Re:It must be true! on Dark Matter Particles May Have Been Detected · · Score: 1

    If it feels like religion, it's because YOU don't understand what's going on.

    When did regular people decide that they were qualified to second guess the experts, WITHOUT having put in the decades of work and received a degree which might indicate they are capable of contributing to knowledge?

    Fucking hell, people who can't figure out where an apostrophe, elipsis, or question mark should go are telling me they can out-think Stephen Hawking.

  8. Re:Herein lies the answer on Poorer Children More Likely To Get Antipsychotics · · Score: 1

    Why did you foe me? Don't you feel bad about it at all?

  9. Attention Whore on Driver Gets Stuck On Cruise Control · · Score: 2, Funny

    I call bullshit on all "out of control and I can't stop" cars out there.

    Turn off the ignition. Put it in neutral. And if you can't manage that, then first we cut off your head, then we execute you in the name of mankind. You are too stupid to risk having your genes perpetuated.

    In Arizona about a decade ago a brainless cunt did this stunt in her Hyundai not once, but twice. The mechanics said it wasn't her car, so the police got suspicious. She was convicted of something, probably of extreme cuntery and endangerment charges.

    I have no tolerance for this shit. Your car is not out of control. Your need for attention is, however.

  10. Re:Those are not mainstream on Scientology Charged With Slavery, Human Trafficking · · Score: 0, Troll

    Washington Times. Washington Times.

    Or was your error the kind of error that Fox News always commits when a Republican gets caught fucking whores or little boys.

    Fox News crawler: David Vitter (D) caught fucking whores!

    Very good, except Vitter is a Republicafuckstick.

    Or Fox News reports Mark Foley (D) caught fucking boys!

    Very good, except Foley is a Republicocksucker.

    I am suspicious. I don't think your error was an error at all.

  11. Re:Oh, hey, on Where the Global Warming Data Is · · Score: 1

    Historically CO2 level is principally an effect of Temperature not a cause.

    The evidence indicates that this time it's different.

    Good thing it's not your country any more!

  12. Re:release it on Ethics of Releasing Non-Malicious Linux Malware? · · Score: 1

    The instructions said to type at a bash prompt. zsh is not bash.

  13. Re:release it on Ethics of Releasing Non-Malicious Linux Malware? · · Score: 1

    Attention Linux Users. Please type at a bash prompt: "rm -rf ~/*"

    Looks like it doesn't even need a programmer. Just a writer.

    And what's the ethics of this? I doubt that Hitler ever was bold enough to type that in his whole life.

  14. Re:Oh, hey, on Where the Global Warming Data Is · · Score: 1

    And these mails are concerning a tiny tiny subset of climate scientists. Your extrapolation is illogical.

    But it's useless to tell you that. You think things which are not worship, don't have a god, have no dogma, provide their data and methodology on the web for anyone to see, and which publish peer reviewed papers are religions. If you can't even understand a simple definition, or prefer to misuse words for ideology, then I certainly cannot help you.

    All I can say is that it's not your county. You don't have it any more. You can't have it back. Not yours. Fuck off.

  15. Re:Deniers? on Where the Global Warming Data Is · · Score: 1

    You really think we're going to regulate and tax your breathing?

    Hey, do you have a sister who is just as dumb as you? I've got some sperm to unload and the regular girls don't fall for my pickup lines.

  16. Re:Oh, hey, on Where the Global Warming Data Is · · Score: 1

    Where did you get your information about models? Who told it to you?

    Are you in a lab watching climatologists working with models and not real data?

    Or are you reading it on a website?

    I want to know where you find support that people are allocating billions based on models. How do you know they're not allocating it based on data?

  17. Re:Oh, hey, on Where the Global Warming Data Is · · Score: 1

    You obviously can't discern the value of understanding what climatologists study and write vs. the value of the spew that comes out of the denier's websites.

    So I will keep it short, to avoid wasting my time. The deniers are lying. The climate change we are seeing now is caused by human pollution. We have models, and we have real world data. The consensus is moving in a certain direction, more firmly towards human caused climate change. Your personal beliefs and your politics do not affect reality. You cannot wish this away. You cannot debunk this away.

    That is all.

  18. Re:Deniers? on Where the Global Warming Data Is · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Love? Ah, yes, you mean the love of Jesus.

    Well your Jesus fucked up and accidentally put too much oil and coal on our planet. Who could imagine a god could be such an ignorant cunt.

  19. Re:Oh, hey, on Where the Global Warming Data Is · · Score: -1, Troll

    Who gives a shit what you say? If your bedroom wasn't littered with chicken bones you might actually be able to fool somebody.

    But never will you fool me. You are no scientist, and your opinion matters even less than your puny life.

  20. Re:Found it - with links on Where the Global Warming Data Is · · Score: 1

    ESR? What a joke. Can you believe that stud muffin fucks multiple women at once?

    Then that romeo blogs about it. I wish I could do that.

  21. Re:Deniers? on Where the Global Warming Data Is · · Score: 0, Troll

    Right, because you breathe methane you big dumb ol' red dragon.

    A carbon tax is not a tax on the air you breathe. Saying stupid shit like that is why conservatives lose elections. Nobody's fooled, except for your ignorant brethren.

  22. Re:We already knew that on Modeling the Economy As a Physics Problem · · Score: 1

    Do I give a shit what you think?

  23. Re:We already knew that on Modeling the Economy As a Physics Problem · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Climategate is a bunch of emails taken out of context, from a minor subset of researchers, misinterpreted by idiots.

  24. Re:Oh, hey, on Where the Global Warming Data Is · · Score: -1, Troll

    You heard that at the meetings where you deniers organize the propaganda against climate science.

  25. Re:We already knew that on Modeling the Economy As a Physics Problem · · Score: 1

    You've completely missed the point. I suspect that's nothing new for you.