Because I'm rich, and things like recessions don't affect me the same way they affect you little people.
P.S. Vote NO on Obama's spendy plans. Rich people like me need to stay rich if you working class types ever want to see a paycheck again. My best interest is YOUR best interest!
"One of Microsoftâ(TM)s goals is to provide options for Midori applications to co-exist with and interoperate with existing Windows applications, as well as to provide a migration path."
OMFG it will run your old shit, AND your new shit!
"According to the documentation, Midori will be built with an asynchronous-only architecture that is built for task concurrency and parallel use of local and distributed resources, with a distributed component-based and data-driven application model, and dynamic management of power and other resources."
OMFG, it can run more than one program at once!
"In order to efficiently distribute applications across nodes, Midori will introduce a higher-level application model that abstracts the details of physical machines and processors. The model will be consistent for both the distributed and local concurrency layers, and it is internally known as Asynchronous Promise Architecture."
In other words, your OS is so fat when it runs applications around the house, it runs applications AROUND THE HOUSE! And what's with the Asynchronous Promise Architecture. Is this a little like I'll gladly give you an OS on Tuesday if you'll give me a little money today?
I don't think I agree. This processor could bring more lifelike movies to my house, for less money. I'm guessing that with this chip popping and rattling, I could get rid of the guy I hired to cough loudy and fumble with crinkly bags of chips in my "true movie experience" home theater room.
This is not a true Scotsman fallacy. I am not making any claims about who is a scientist based on irrelevant items. In fact, that you would even consider what I wrote to be anything like a true Scottsman fallacy is an indicator of your tiny intelligence.
I am claiming that these scientists are true scientists because they have actual, relevant, and world recognize expertise in climatology. It's the equivalent of saying that a man is a true Scottsman because he was BORN IN SCOTLAND. The fallacy would be saying that a man is not a true Scottsman because he doesn't play bagpipes; obviously one can be a true Scottsman without playing bagpipes, but not if they aren't even a Scot.
What's crap is any kind of relevant comparison to Earth's climate. The data are not crap. We know just what Mars has done in the past 10 years, roughly. We know even more roughly what Mars has done in the past 30 years, and even more roughly still what Mars has done in the last century.
That's crap, considering we know what the Earth's climate was, roughly, about a billion years ago, and we know what the climate was, pretty well, a hundred million years ago.
So, that's what I mean by crap. I don't mean that it's bad Mars data, I just mean that it's irrelevant crap for Earth's climate, and a comparison is a sign of stupidity.
Global warming is considered to be a fact. There's no consensus needed because it's what our instruments are measuring through several unconnected lines of research.
Climatologists are hashing out what's causing it, and the consensus over time is that it's caused by humans. Consensus, and the trend of consensus here are very important. If we eventually expected things to turn out differently, we'd expect consensus to decline as more data comes in. Instead, as more data is gathered, the evidence becomes stronger, not weaker.
The whole "Mars is warming" thing is crap. You are looking at a tiny amount of data, from a couple of spacecraft that aren't even really designed to measure that.
The data we have on the Earth presents a pretty good picture of warming, and the scientific consensus is that it's human caused. The trend in scientific consensus is also increasingly towards it being human caused.
Human stem cells weren't even discovered until 1998, and in response President Clinton's administration recommended to allow funding for some embryo experimentation. It wasn't until 2001 that the ethics process concluded and the ruling was issued. That was the ruling that GW Bush acted on, way back in 2001.
And then GW Bush sat there. Science advanced, and he did nothing to advance policy along with the science.
Don't make apologies for Bush. He cannot be defended.
FDA protections? How about the restrictions on stem cell research. Add the people who could have benefitted, but died because of the technology delay, to the list of GW Bush's victims.
I say fukk'em. Companies don't do anything out of the good of their hearts. They do things because they make money. Sun would endure a million people shouting "cunt" at them every day if they thought they could make money. And they'd ignore a million people sending candies and flowers every day if they would lose money.
So if Intel is going to get out of OSS because people are irritated and express it, then Intel will die from their own stupidity.
I'm pretty sure the Poles never wanted to be persecuted. It was just a historical accident of occupying the nice flat land between large imperial powers. Whoops!
And since the predictions you made were COMPLETELY backwards - you've got a 4 Insightful and the one you said was going to be +5 is down at 0 Flamebait - what does that say about your theory?
It says hypothesis disproved. Why do you want to be persecuted so badly?
First, the airplane is a MiG-21, which would definitely not be in the RAF. Maybe that should be a photo of a Eurofighter or a Tornado. And second, the UFO is rounded with a high dome, indicating a Rigellian spacecraft. Everybody knows that those assholes can't be bothered to explore a water-oxygen world that they can't even live on. The photo should have included the cigar shaped Antaran spacecraft.
Just a couple days ago I had a pissing match with a right wing idiot who thought that my *sig* was good justification for a troll mod. Nevermind that the content was not political, and was informative.
So yes, O'Reilly might have gotten some troll mods too. Big fucking deal.
You know, I was just thinking about you while I was jerking off. I was on my back, but then I flipped my legs up over my head and rolled onto the back of my neck. Then I shot my load all over my face and pretended it was you.
Happy fucking new year, you fucking moron who was WRONG, but is too stupid to realize that he was WRONG, and I'm the guy who is stuck reminding you that you were WRONG. Lucky me.
I'm skipping Seagate for a while. My last 6 drives were all Barracudas, but recent news makes me nervous. I just ordered a 1 TB Western Digital, primarily based on the fact that my last WD drive was pretty good. It was a 200 megabyte drive I bought in 1992.
It still seems weird that Western Digital uses fish EGGS in their drives while Seagate writes data onto the fish itself. Hard drives are truly a mystery.
Slashdot Mirror
She's not a good Democrat. Step 1 for Democrats was to get more elected Democrats. Now that is accomplished, step 2 is to get better Democrats.
Feinstein and many others will probably be facing primary challengers for the next election. We can certainly find better Democrats than these people.
The beginning of your video on your page reminds me of a Chinese version of that Cold Play hit. You know the one, "Crocks" I think it's called.
Because I'm rich, and things like recessions don't affect me the same way they affect you little people.
P.S. Vote NO on Obama's spendy plans. Rich people like me need to stay rich if you working class types ever want to see a paycheck again. My best interest is YOUR best interest!
WTF will this OS be able to do?
From one of the links in the Google search:
"One of Microsoftâ(TM)s goals is to provide options for Midori applications to co-exist with and interoperate with existing Windows applications, as well as to provide a migration path."
OMFG it will run your old shit, AND your new shit!
"According to the documentation, Midori will be built with an asynchronous-only architecture that is built for task concurrency and parallel use of local and distributed resources, with a distributed component-based and data-driven application model, and dynamic management of power and other resources."
OMFG, it can run more than one program at once!
"In order to efficiently distribute applications across nodes, Midori will introduce a higher-level application model that abstracts the details of physical machines and processors. The model will be consistent for both the distributed and local concurrency layers, and it is internally known as Asynchronous Promise Architecture."
In other words, your OS is so fat when it runs applications around the house, it runs applications AROUND THE HOUSE! And what's with the Asynchronous Promise Architecture. Is this a little like I'll gladly give you an OS on Tuesday if you'll give me a little money today?
Fail. That wasn't an insult, try again. You CANNOT insult me. You are simply not up to the task, baby man.
You also missed the logic. Are you trying to make fun of me? Are you trying to run me down? You can't do it. I doubt you are adequate.
I don't think I agree. This processor could bring more lifelike movies to my house, for less money. I'm guessing that with this chip popping and rattling, I could get rid of the guy I hired to cough loudy and fumble with crinkly bags of chips in my "true movie experience" home theater room.
This is not a true Scotsman fallacy. I am not making any claims about who is a scientist based on irrelevant items. In fact, that you would even consider what I wrote to be anything like a true Scottsman fallacy is an indicator of your tiny intelligence.
I am claiming that these scientists are true scientists because they have actual, relevant, and world recognize expertise in climatology. It's the equivalent of saying that a man is a true Scottsman because he was BORN IN SCOTLAND. The fallacy would be saying that a man is not a true Scottsman because he doesn't play bagpipes; obviously one can be a true Scottsman without playing bagpipes, but not if they aren't even a Scot.
What's crap is any kind of relevant comparison to Earth's climate. The data are not crap. We know just what Mars has done in the past 10 years, roughly. We know even more roughly what Mars has done in the past 30 years, and even more roughly still what Mars has done in the last century.
That's crap, considering we know what the Earth's climate was, roughly, about a billion years ago, and we know what the climate was, pretty well, a hundred million years ago.
So, that's what I mean by crap. I don't mean that it's bad Mars data, I just mean that it's irrelevant crap for Earth's climate, and a comparison is a sign of stupidity.
Global warming is considered to be a fact. There's no consensus needed because it's what our instruments are measuring through several unconnected lines of research.
Climatologists are hashing out what's causing it, and the consensus over time is that it's caused by humans. Consensus, and the trend of consensus here are very important. If we eventually expected things to turn out differently, we'd expect consensus to decline as more data comes in. Instead, as more data is gathered, the evidence becomes stronger, not weaker.
Right, because people with funny names are NEVER right. Nice logic!
The whole "Mars is warming" thing is crap. You are looking at a tiny amount of data, from a couple of spacecraft that aren't even really designed to measure that.
The data we have on the Earth presents a pretty good picture of warming, and the scientific consensus is that it's human caused. The trend in scientific consensus is also increasingly towards it being human caused.
Human stem cells weren't even discovered until 1998, and in response President Clinton's administration recommended to allow funding for some embryo experimentation. It wasn't until 2001 that the ethics process concluded and the ruling was issued. That was the ruling that GW Bush acted on, way back in 2001.
And then GW Bush sat there. Science advanced, and he did nothing to advance policy along with the science.
Don't make apologies for Bush. He cannot be defended.
FDA protections? How about the restrictions on stem cell research. Add the people who could have benefitted, but died because of the technology delay, to the list of GW Bush's victims.
Man has a weapon,
and man also has gun.
One is for killing,
and one is for fun.
Woman has obviously seen man discharge his gun.
Look at the stretch marks on the tummay!
I say fukk'em. Companies don't do anything out of the good of their hearts. They do things because they make money. Sun would endure a million people shouting "cunt" at them every day if they thought they could make money. And they'd ignore a million people sending candies and flowers every day if they would lose money.
So if Intel is going to get out of OSS because people are irritated and express it, then Intel will die from their own stupidity.
I'm pretty sure the Poles never wanted to be persecuted. It was just a historical accident of occupying the nice flat land between large imperial powers. Whoops!
And since the predictions you made were COMPLETELY backwards - you've got a 4 Insightful and the one you said was going to be +5 is down at 0 Flamebait - what does that say about your theory?
It says hypothesis disproved. Why do you want to be persecuted so badly?
First, the airplane is a MiG-21, which would definitely not be in the RAF. Maybe that should be a photo of a Eurofighter or a Tornado. And second, the UFO is rounded with a high dome, indicating a Rigellian spacecraft. Everybody knows that those assholes can't be bothered to explore a water-oxygen world that they can't even live on. The photo should have included the cigar shaped Antaran spacecraft.
Just a couple days ago I had a pissing match with a right wing idiot who thought that my *sig* was good justification for a troll mod. Nevermind that the content was not political, and was informative.
So yes, O'Reilly might have gotten some troll mods too. Big fucking deal.
You know, I was just thinking about you while I was jerking off. I was on my back, but then I flipped my legs up over my head and rolled onto the back of my neck. Then I shot my load all over my face and pretended it was you.
Happy fucking new year, you fucking moron who was WRONG, but is too stupid to realize that he was WRONG, and I'm the guy who is stuck reminding you that you were WRONG. Lucky me.
I'm skipping Seagate for a while. My last 6 drives were all Barracudas, but recent news makes me nervous. I just ordered a 1 TB Western Digital, primarily based on the fact that my last WD drive was pretty good. It was a 200 megabyte drive I bought in 1992.
It still seems weird that Western Digital uses fish EGGS in their drives while Seagate writes data onto the fish itself. Hard drives are truly a mystery.
Really? Not even running it for 30 seconds on, and 2 hours off? Might take a while to get home, but it'd be air cooled.