We need a ship with nuclear engines that can make the trip in a quarter the time it currently takes.
The only problem here are the Naturalists keeping Nuclear here on the ground. Their conflict was its too *unsafe* for lifting off. Imagine a Columbia blowup with 5 nuclear engines. Think about the fallout and radiation. Now if we had that Moon base, funk it, no atmosphere and we can trash it all we want.
Maybe you missed the news, but we DO have some viable competition from the Chinese. They are already planning another space flight this year and I've heard about a planned Moon mission. Who do you want controlling space and the Moon, us or the Chinese?
Finally a worthy cause I support and I am glad my tax dollars will fund it. We should have never stopped going to the Moon. The scientific research alone is worth it. Once we're finally here, some scientist will come up with a way to transform the enormous reserves of Helium3 into a rocket fuel. Launching from the Moon is a whole heck of lot easier as a starting point for a manned Mars mission.
The ex-Tres. Sec. has claimed that GWB already intended to prosecute such a war when he entered office - if true, he either was planning with forethought (possible) or he thought the military was good enough to do it.
Clinton did the same report in 1997, but do we hear about that? Uh no. The only difference between the two was Clinton wanted data on air strikes whereas Bush wanted data on using ground forces. And its common for all presidents to get data or ask for data like this. They are DOING THEIR JOB!
1, I don't think my logic is flawed. If you wait until your ready, your never ready, so you keep waiting. The supplies and weapons will get to them eventually. If we had waited longer we would have lost more lives.
2, I really don't care what Franken has to say. But the lower and middle class got more of a tax break than they usually do. I too pay 30% in income taxes, but I feel my money is better spent on what the Republicans want.
I don't like charity and feel none of my taxes should be in hand outs, social programs or whatever.
No, I am guessing your stupid. Since you described every other "format" and forgot "screener". Like the article said a screener is a tape or DVD which is sent to an Academy member.
I want an apology from the MPAA. All this time they have been blaming downloaders and moviegoes for "leaking" these screeners. Now we discover its one of their own. I wonder how many of the other screeners were "released" by other Academy members.
And all of those "expenditures" were to get American back to a certain level. The Clintons really fubared our military with funding cuts, base closings and pay decreases for our soldiers.
And the so called "the rich got the tax cuts" scheme. If you didn't pay into the system, you didn't get anything back. Too bad. Suck it up. As I said before, the top 5% pay nearly 85% of the federal income tax. Why shouldn't they get some of THEIR money back? You'll see it different when you start paying taxes and as your income rises, taxes get larger and larger.
Hopefully you will leave Burger King, get a better job and discover there is more to this country.
Or even better, Norway or was its Sweden, anyway some "nordiac" country, workers pay 70% tax on their wages. And to think America has one of the lowest tax systems in the World and they still whine.
Another gimmick. Those people got the tax breaks because they PAY Federal Income Tax. The top 5% pay 85% of the federal income tax. I am NOT in favor of giving money to people who didn't pay into the system. This is NOT a socialist America.
By the time you get to 75 grand a year, you'll be paying half that in taxes every year, roughly 43% of your total income.
So why be rich when Democrats all want to increase your taxes to pay for social programs? Funk dat! Let the weasels starve, its called "Law of the Land" and "only the strongest survive."
If the Dems do get into office, I will refuse any pay increases. What's the bother of making more when they'll just take more?
I would be very interesting if we found something like that because it would be another branch of evolution. You could say we are all from the same "star stuff". We just happened to branch off to carbon based lifeforms. I'd be interested to find out how they went that way.
We all forgot the Linux based commercials IBM has been running for many months now. Note the basketball commercials with Linux on the jersey or a Penguin as a mascot.
Actually, I am quite please with my dual 1Ghz G4. No problems at all. It runs very quiet, and the Super Drive still works. Video card is so-so, but that's because I got the Radeon instead of the NVIDIA so its a driver issue under Linux.
But I can run all my Linux apps at the same time I got OS X in a window and I barely use both processors. If it weren't for the fact they are so expensive, I'd consider buying one for home use.
This just confirms one thing I have found gullable with people. Make anything "flashy" and say buzz words like "original", "fastest computer on the planet", and now "Apple did it first" and people go goo-goo over it. Typical Mac user.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe we need to again start thinking about drilling in ANWR.
The only problem here are the Naturalists keeping Nuclear here on the ground. Their conflict was its too *unsafe* for lifting off. Imagine a Columbia blowup with 5 nuclear engines. Think about the fallout and radiation. Now if we had that Moon base, funk it, no atmosphere and we can trash it all we want.
Maybe you missed the news, but we DO have some viable competition from the Chinese. They are already planning another space flight this year and I've heard about a planned Moon mission. Who do you want controlling space and the Moon, us or the Chinese?
Finally a worthy cause I support and I am glad my tax dollars will fund it. We should have never stopped going to the Moon. The scientific research alone is worth it. Once we're finally here, some scientist will come up with a way to transform the enormous reserves of Helium3 into a rocket fuel. Launching from the Moon is a whole heck of lot easier as a starting point for a manned Mars mission.
This might work, but the fry clerk is gonna have a hard time wiping all the grease of his hands just to check out.
Clinton did the same report in 1997, but do we hear about that? Uh no. The only difference between the two was Clinton wanted data on air strikes whereas Bush wanted data on using ground forces. And its common for all presidents to get data or ask for data like this. They are DOING THEIR JOB!
2, I really don't care what Franken has to say. But the lower and middle class got more of a tax break than they usually do. I too pay 30% in income taxes, but I feel my money is better spent on what the Republicans want.
I don't like charity and feel none of my taxes should be in hand outs, social programs or whatever.
50ish women.... nekkid... brrrrrrrr.... nasty..
Well this was the first time they were actually looking for them.
No, I am guessing your stupid. Since you described every other "format" and forgot "screener". Like the article said a screener is a tape or DVD which is sent to an Academy member.
I want an apology from the MPAA. All this time they have been blaming downloaders and moviegoes for "leaking" these screeners. Now we discover its one of their own. I wonder how many of the other screeners were "released" by other Academy members.
And the so called "the rich got the tax cuts" scheme. If you didn't pay into the system, you didn't get anything back. Too bad. Suck it up. As I said before, the top 5% pay nearly 85% of the federal income tax. Why shouldn't they get some of THEIR money back? You'll see it different when you start paying taxes and as your income rises, taxes get larger and larger.
Hopefully you will leave Burger King, get a better job and discover there is more to this country.
Or even better, Norway or was its Sweden, anyway some "nordiac" country, workers pay 70% tax on their wages. And to think America has one of the lowest tax systems in the World and they still whine.
Another gimmick. Those people got the tax breaks because they PAY Federal Income Tax. The top 5% pay 85% of the federal income tax. I am NOT in favor of giving money to people who didn't pay into the system. This is NOT a socialist America.
So why be rich when Democrats all want to increase your taxes to pay for social programs? Funk dat! Let the weasels starve, its called "Law of the Land" and "only the strongest survive."
If the Dems do get into office, I will refuse any pay increases. What's the bother of making more when they'll just take more?
I would be very interesting if we found something like that because it would be another branch of evolution. You could say we are all from the same "star stuff". We just happened to branch off to carbon based lifeforms. I'd be interested to find out how they went that way.
My prediction (without being a scientist and without funding):
Between now and Dec '04, SCO will release another press release
And my favorite Linux Commercial. "What's his name?.... Linux"
But I can run all my Linux apps at the same time I got OS X in a window and I barely use both processors. If it weren't for the fact they are so expensive, I'd consider buying one for home use.
Oh, so that's how you spell asinine.
This just confirms one thing I have found gullable with people. Make anything "flashy" and say buzz words like "original", "fastest computer on the planet", and now "Apple did it first" and people go goo-goo over it. Typical Mac user.
I did it because, belive it or not, its WAY faster in Linux than OS X. And I can run OS X where it should be run, in a window with Mac On Linux.
I did the next best thing I could do when I got my Mac. fdisk that dang OS X and installed Yellow Dog.
Again, any beginner *nix user has no trouble setting these up. I consider these zero configuration. But anyway, what's your gripe?
I normally don't respond to ACs but you are truely a Mac moron.