RadLight has nothing to gain by this publicity or these posts. Only one company has anything to gain, Ad-Aware.
Is it conceivable that Ad-Aware could be behind this?
The response from RadLight is so bad that it is unbelievable, but, who would go to the effort of writing a post of such length if it weren't RadLight?
Hmm, I wonder if..possibly...nah...noway...but then again, that post is so bad it is inconceivable that someone from RadLight would have actually been stupid enough to make it.
I use Ad-Aware and it appears to be effective, but I also have no doubt that a company might try some really clever grass roots self promotion stunt like say "a super sleazy spyware program that deletes the Clark Kent like product they offer that is on the side of all that is good and right and protects the common man".
Which marketing tactic do you think Mr. "enemy at the" Gates would use?
Slashdot Mirror
RadLight has nothing to gain by this publicity or these posts. Only one company has anything to gain, Ad-Aware. Is it conceivable that Ad-Aware could be behind this? The response from RadLight is so bad that it is unbelievable, but, who would go to the effort of writing a post of such length if it weren't RadLight? Hmm, I wonder if..possibly...nah...noway...but then again, that post is so bad it is inconceivable that someone from RadLight would have actually been stupid enough to make it. I use Ad-Aware and it appears to be effective, but I also have no doubt that a company might try some really clever grass roots self promotion stunt like say "a super sleazy spyware program that deletes the Clark Kent like product they offer that is on the side of all that is good and right and protects the common man". Which marketing tactic do you think Mr. "enemy at the" Gates would use?