Just becuase people break the law is not a justification for having no laws at all. Having a law against it will discourage the process and make it more difficult for labs to get funding to carry out the procedure.
Society needs to take a stand against actions that we feel are wrong
How often when you debug code do you actually change the objective of a function enough that you actually have to change the comment? Usually then you are writing a new function and have to write new comments anyway
Caleb
I agree. I can't see Red Hat being just out for a cash grab. It looks like they just want to be recognized for their creativity. This could be a way that open source creators could protect their products
Caleb
Slashdot Mirror
Just becuase people break the law is not a justification for having no laws at all. Having a law against it will discourage the process and make it more difficult for labs to get funding to carry out the procedure.
Society needs to take a stand against actions that we feel are wrong
How often when you debug code do you actually change the objective of a function enough that you actually have to change the comment? Usually then you are writing a new function and have to write new comments anyway Caleb
I agree. I can't see Red Hat being just out for a cash grab. It looks like they just want to be recognized for their creativity. This could be a way that open source creators could protect their products Caleb