Most of ground deaths were caused by unreasonable high pressure from the top political communist leaders. Not from technical reasons.
I know that as I I spoke to some russian kosmonauts back in University where they gave us some introductionary lessons about the space research. After official lessons we usually had some non-official questions-and-answers meetings... Memories...
Anyway, that pressure from top-communists has been declined even in late years of Soviet Union. Today Russian leaders don't make that pressure either. So, the management style in Russian Space programs is very different. It's still very disciplined (not like in over-burocratic NASA) and based on old school russian scientific culture (lack of such culture is the major problem in USA IMHO). And of course it's very technology-oriented (that's like in NASA).
I believe in todays Russian Space programs. Even if US administration will make everything to shut it down in order to protect own NASA, Russians still can make some space business with EU and Australia. And perhaps Latin America too. The only problem to be expected is if USA administration would try to shut such relationships down, looking at it as a terrorrsm or something.
that their [PHP] language is anything more than a quick hack to get your work done.
That reminds me Perl: you can cook a quick hack very quickly, but no chances you can read it after few weeks. In other words: your job can be done with PHP quickly, but it cannot be maintained after that.
Explain yourself, and better with examples, please. Or admit that you've just done some trolling.
DTML documentation never said to write Python scripts instead, as DTML is a markup based on Python. On this esense, DTML is no different than PHP, just using Python (very common language even outside DTML!) as underlying scripting instead of something that you never find outside PHP.
The only advise to use something instead of DTML is to use ZPT, which is namespace-aware naturally-further generation of DTML.
In both cases, with DTML and ZPT it is advised that in case of complicated scripts you can write scripts in separate files and call them from DTML/ZPT tags. But that is called structuring you program code, which is a good thing.
So, stop trolling and talk with facts in your hands.
Just for a case if there are people here who don't know about Zope but who are tired from primitivenesses of PHP and who would be interesting in migrating to Zope from PHP:
There is much better alternative to PHP. It's called Zope. In fact, Zope has two similar (but very superior) markup languages: DTML and ZPT, both using Python for underlying scripting.
Just go to the site and check brief functional description - you will be surprise how far their technology has been developed for the last year.
Personally, I was developing on PHP before (like SquirelWebMail plugins, database applications), but I don't see any reason to write PHP anymore. All my current and upcoming web-projects are only Zope-based.
Do you mean Georgia as a state in USA or you mean Georgia as one of Caucasian republics? If you mean the latter - they have just direct presidential election and they did not use any electornic kiosks for that. Paper, all the way paper - that the only way to have it properly documented to avoid any conflicts.
Even with paper last parlament elections in Georgia fired so much conflicts that it led the republic to one more revolution, the president has resigned and they had to re-elect the president.
If you don't want to have the same chaos and anarchy in USA - don't use electronic election kiosks unless all parties have approved and control all the data flow in the real time. Any offline will lead to conflicts.
Since when management feels more comfortable in situations where sysadmin feels it less? Oh, and did I tell you that sysadmins do not feel comfortable when Sun attempts to do any job for them screwing something up instead?
I remember the time we've been running on Linux (also with no support) Oracle binaries we've got (legally!) for SCO Unix. By doing that we've improved both performance and stability. We've been ready to trade the official Oracle support for speed and reliability.
Now the question is: by running Linux binaries of Oracle on BSD, what would I trade my vendor (Oracle) support to? Speed? I doubt so. Stability? Been there done that - Linux binaries on BSD even today are less stable (actually they are too crashy to accept it) then SCO binaries on Linux 8 years ago.
Asking for the reason, why Linux is more stable than BSD? The answer is simple: QA, Quality Assurance, with Linux installation base counting millions versus BSD's one counting what? thosands at most? No need to mention the amount of Linux developers capable to fix bugs versus BSD developers.
I am telling it for new flamewar. Actually the flamewar Linux vs BSD is over. Today people choose between Windows and Linux. And for many of peopl it's not a question "if", it's more like "when".
Any other open-source OS just doesn't have chances.
Dispite the fact that I am programming 18 years for living, I never was in love with computers. I prefer to use women for love. I use computer for doing the job.
That's why bootable Mac OS never survived on my Macs for long. It always ended up with bootable Linux/PPC, keeping Mac OS for MOL although.
Honestly, I've tried hard to understand why I would prefer Mac OS, but I always gave up. Each time I use Mac OS the "cannot" list grows faster than than "can" list. Besides, it's so inconvinient to have one OS for Macs and another for PCs.
No need to mention that the quality of open source support in OS X is worse than on MS-Windows: Xfree, OpenOffice, Mozilla - they are almost unusable, comparing to them on MS-Windows boxen.
So, I use Linux/PPC on my both Macs and both PCs. So does my family. So my co-workers.
With so many PCs around people are thinking about dual-bootable Windows/Linux configurations, as dual-bootable Windows/OSX doesn't exist. So people, who think realistically, would prefer Linux even on Mac boxen - it's less hassle to learn something new.
Well, I've noticed that most of people who loves OSX, they blindly ignore the existence of other computers around and the fact that the rest of computers are PCs. I think Macs are good, but the reality is different. If you ignore the reality - you are a blind zealot.
Oh, that's easy: have your friend in Russia to give you stunnel address and enjoy how FBI is weak attempting to figure out anything about IP address in Russia. Or China. Well, actually in many countries.
I said it before and I'll say it again: the globalization MUST be improved. If they want investigations across the borders - they have to remove the borders. That include the freedom to trade across the borders, the freedom to hire across the borders, the freedom to ELECT across the borders, the freedom to immigrate across the borders.
You don't wanna give that freedom to people? Enjoy your useless attempts to sue DVD hackers in Norvey and find IP addresses in Russia.
Remember: there is no such thing as "half of globalization". It either exists givig equal opportunities and freedoms to everyone, or it doesn't exist at all.
Something magical is upcoming. I've tried to find anything about Evolution Dataserver version 2.0 mentioned in interview, and all I found so far were references to cvs. Looks like apart few developers accessing thisnew wombat no one else knows what it is, how it is designed and how it works.
They all should stop filing suits againsta each other. Instead they should file the suit against USPTO, blaming it for the unfixable stupidity, for using the broken law system. USPTO bad business practices is a danger to strategic interests of USA in general.
By the way, Scons, as Python, is cross-platform. But Aegis is not: AFAIK it's only for systems with Unix-like file permissions and all other ports are too unstable. So, here is my quastion:
Have you ever consider Subversion instead of Aegis for change management in Scons? If so, does it has same level of support for testing? If so, can you recommend a combination of Subversion+Scons for the process automation in mid-size teams?
No problem. Once such music-synthesizing software programs will grow smarter, they will create their own unions.
So, what laws says about conflicts between unions?
Well, knowing unions I can say they will unite soon, and the battle will be over. The music producer will have to hire either alive musicians from the union, or the software from the same union.
I just don't think that the Mac is going to disappear because of linux.
Not at all, at my home both Macs are running Gentoo/PPC:)
The Apple zealots are worse than Linux'es own!
What are talking about? I am a Mac zealot and a Linux zealot at the same time. I am running Linux on Macs!
Seriusly, I think (or should I also say "I predict"!) that it will take about three years for Apple to realize that OS X was a bad design idea (dying BSD, dead micro-kernel etc). Then they will port their GUI to Linux/PPC keeping the same pricing (I guess), now just only for GUI.
If it exists in the Universe as a whole, it can exist also in pieces. There could be many reasons why another big diamond would be broken into millions of smaller (but still huge) pieces.
We know (we think we know) that there is a lot of dark matter between star ssystems and between galaxies. No need to go that far - there is a belt of cold rocks outside of Pluto. Who knows, maybe some of those rocks are broken pieces of one of such diamond star.
Now, it's a matter of time that they will discover of proof of such diamond rocks there and begin hunting for them. Can it stimulate investors to space industry?
How about using a chat messaging? Do you want to help her to finish her studies or do you want to disturb and distract her from her studies?
Chatting through short messaging is way better to help her rather than voice talking or gaming.
At least it will help her to learn how to type faster and how to talk less.
How does 2.6 compare to Free or Open BSD & how do they compare to windows 2003 server doing the same job?
Doing what job? You didn't specify it.
I use both Linux and various Windows on a daily basis. I can tell then one or another is faster in different tasks. Linux can share files way faster. But J2EE runs on Windows much faster. Running multiple small tasks is better scheduled in Linux. But openning some multimedia files in players is better on Windows.
I don't work with Free or Open BSD on a daily basis. But developers who write the code of PostgreSQL told in mail-lists that their database server runs faster on FreeBSD than on Linux. Well, perhaps because they prefer to spend more time to optimize their code for BSD as they religiously against Linux.
My point is: don't try to compare oranges againsta apples unless you really specify the comparisson.
Why? Because Java is just another bloat, another lock-in.
J2EE is over-bloated in order to be useful, but that kills it perform fast on small hardware (if to run at all). J2ME can run on really small hardware, but it lacks most of features people need for standalone applications. No need to mention Java GUI - its unfamouse SWING, which is just a joke.
Talking about cross-platform: Java cannot run on all platforms as Linux does. Well, unless you begin to count JDK-1.0.8 which just another useless kludge.
Should I remind you that Sun is doing everything to lock you in to its Java technologies? Still not convienced? Then where is the source code of JVM and JDK? Again, don't show me any 1.0.8 - nobody will use it now anyway.
My point is to support Twisted Python: it works on Linux (and thus on way more platforms than java). You can use a native code for any critical parts and scripts for flexibility. And it won't require GHz and GB from your hardware. It's as compact as J2ME and as functional as J2EE. Java cann never deliver such compactness and functionality at te same time (only one or another mutually exclusively). And it's open source, so no one keeps in mind to lock you in.
I have it for email coming to me. It's called Spamassassin. If you are not in the white list and your content has not been used to learn the ham - forget it, your email will never rich me.
Hydrogen, getting it from ethanol in the proposed reactor;
Electricity, getting it from cell by oxyding the hydrogen;
Moving parts, getting it by using electicity in the motor;
Excuse me? Doesn't it look long and ineffective?
Here is what I propose:
Sugar, growing under the special vegi-skin on human bodies under the Sun after small genetic modifications;
Miving skeletons, after burning the sugar in muscles;
You see? Much shorter, simpler and easier. Of course, human bodies are efficient for all kinds of jobs. So modify genetically other animals, or design new ones. Byt keep the principle as simple as possible:
Tired? - Go and take a sun-bath to get some sugar in your blood.
Too much sugar? - Go and do some job for the society.
And no more conflicts between white people and black people - we are all gonna be green by then:)
I know that as I I spoke to some russian kosmonauts back in University where they gave us some introductionary lessons about the space research. After official lessons we usually had some non-official questions-and-answers meetings... Memories...
Anyway, that pressure from top-communists has been declined even in late years of Soviet Union. Today Russian leaders don't make that pressure either. So, the management style in Russian Space programs is very different. It's still very disciplined (not like in over-burocratic NASA) and based on old school russian scientific culture (lack of such culture is the major problem in USA IMHO). And of course it's very technology-oriented (that's like in NASA).
I believe in todays Russian Space programs. Even if US administration will make everything to shut it down in order to protect own NASA, Russians still can make some space business with EU and Australia. And perhaps Latin America too. The only problem to be expected is if USA administration would try to shut such relationships down, looking at it as a terrorrsm or something.
That reminds me Perl: you can cook a quick hack very quickly, but no chances you can read it after few weeks. In other words: your job can be done with PHP quickly, but it cannot be maintained after that.
DTML documentation never said to write Python scripts instead, as DTML is a markup based on Python. On this esense, DTML is no different than PHP, just using Python (very common language even outside DTML!) as underlying scripting instead of something that you never find outside PHP.
The only advise to use something instead of DTML is to use ZPT, which is namespace-aware naturally-further generation of DTML.
In both cases, with DTML and ZPT it is advised that in case of complicated scripts you can write scripts in separate files and call them from DTML/ZPT tags. But that is called structuring you program code, which is a good thing.
So, stop trolling and talk with facts in your hands.
what is "(sic)"?
There is much better alternative to PHP. It's called Zope. In fact, Zope has two similar (but very superior) markup languages: DTML and ZPT, both using Python for underlying scripting.
Just go to the site and check brief functional description - you will be surprise how far their technology has been developed for the last year.
Personally, I was developing on PHP before (like SquirelWebMail plugins, database applications), but I don't see any reason to write PHP anymore. All my current and upcoming web-projects are only Zope-based.
I cannot believe the parent is not modded up as informative yet AND no one else noticed such a huge typo.
Even with paper last parlament elections in Georgia fired so much conflicts that it led the republic to one more revolution, the president has resigned and they had to re-elect the president.
If you don't want to have the same chaos and anarchy in USA - don't use electronic election kiosks unless all parties have approved and control all the data flow in the real time. Any offline will lead to conflicts.
Since when management feels more comfortable in situations where sysadmin feels it less? Oh, and did I tell you that sysadmins do not feel comfortable when Sun attempts to do any job for them screwing something up instead?
Now the question is: by running Linux binaries of Oracle on BSD, what would I trade my vendor (Oracle) support to? Speed? I doubt so. Stability? Been there done that - Linux binaries on BSD even today are less stable (actually they are too crashy to accept it) then SCO binaries on Linux 8 years ago.
Asking for the reason, why Linux is more stable than BSD? The answer is simple: QA, Quality Assurance, with Linux installation base counting millions versus BSD's one counting what? thosands at most? No need to mention the amount of Linux developers capable to fix bugs versus BSD developers.
I am telling it for new flamewar. Actually the flamewar Linux vs BSD is over. Today people choose between Windows and Linux. And for many of peopl it's not a question "if", it's more like "when".
Any other open-source OS just doesn't have chances.
Dispite the fact that I am programming 18 years for living, I never was in love with computers. I prefer to use women for love. I use computer for doing the job.
That's why bootable Mac OS never survived on my Macs for long. It always ended up with bootable Linux/PPC, keeping Mac OS for MOL although.
Honestly, I've tried hard to understand why I would prefer Mac OS, but I always gave up. Each time I use Mac OS the "cannot" list grows faster than than "can" list. Besides, it's so inconvinient to have one OS for Macs and another for PCs.
No need to mention that the quality of open source support in OS X is worse than on MS-Windows: Xfree, OpenOffice, Mozilla - they are almost unusable, comparing to them on MS-Windows boxen.
So, I use Linux/PPC on my both Macs and both PCs. So does my family. So my co-workers.
With so many PCs around people are thinking about dual-bootable Windows/Linux configurations, as dual-bootable Windows/OSX doesn't exist. So people, who think realistically, would prefer Linux even on Mac boxen - it's less hassle to learn something new.
Well, I've noticed that most of people who loves OSX, they blindly ignore the existence of other computers around and the fact that the rest of computers are PCs. I think Macs are good, but the reality is different. If you ignore the reality - you are a blind zealot.
I said it before and I'll say it again: the globalization MUST be improved. If they want investigations across the borders - they have to remove the borders. That include the freedom to trade across the borders, the freedom to hire across the borders, the freedom to ELECT across the borders, the freedom to immigrate across the borders.
You don't wanna give that freedom to people? Enjoy your useless attempts to sue DVD hackers in Norvey and find IP addresses in Russia.
Remember: there is no such thing as "half of globalization". It either exists givig equal opportunities and freedoms to everyone, or it doesn't exist at all.
Something magical is upcoming. I've tried to find anything about Evolution Dataserver version 2.0 mentioned in interview, and all I found so far were references to cvs. Looks like apart few developers accessing thisnew wombat no one else knows what it is, how it is designed and how it works.
They all should stop filing suits againsta each other. Instead they should file the suit against USPTO, blaming it for the unfixable stupidity, for using the broken law system. USPTO bad business practices is a danger to strategic interests of USA in general.
Perl code - cannot read after writing;
Slashdot - cannot write after reading;
Haiku - cannot read and write.
On a second thought:
Perl code - cannot read after writing; Slashdot - cannot write after reading; Haiku - cannot read and write.
Have you ever consider Subversion instead of Aegis for change management in Scons? If so, does it has same level of support for testing? If so, can you recommend a combination of Subversion+Scons for the process automation in mid-size teams?
So, what laws says about conflicts between unions?
Well, knowing unions I can say they will unite soon, and the battle will be over. The music producer will have to hire either alive musicians from the union, or the software from the same union.
Everyone's happy. Problem's solved.
Not at all, at my home both Macs are running Gentoo/PPC :)
The Apple zealots are worse than Linux'es own!
What are talking about? I am a Mac zealot and a Linux zealot at the same time. I am running Linux on Macs!
Seriusly, I think (or should I also say "I predict"!) that it will take about three years for Apple to realize that OS X was a bad design idea (dying BSD, dead micro-kernel etc). Then they will port their GUI to Linux/PPC keeping the same pricing (I guess), now just only for GUI.
We know (we think we know) that there is a lot of dark matter between star ssystems and between galaxies. No need to go that far - there is a belt of cold rocks outside of Pluto. Who knows, maybe some of those rocks are broken pieces of one of such diamond star.
Now, it's a matter of time that they will discover of proof of such diamond rocks there and begin hunting for them. Can it stimulate investors to space industry?
At least it will help her to learn how to type faster and how to talk less.
Doing what job? You didn't specify it.
I use both Linux and various Windows on a daily basis. I can tell then one or another is faster in different tasks. Linux can share files way faster. But J2EE runs on Windows much faster. Running multiple small tasks is better scheduled in Linux. But openning some multimedia files in players is better on Windows.
I don't work with Free or Open BSD on a daily basis. But developers who write the code of PostgreSQL told in mail-lists that their database server runs faster on FreeBSD than on Linux. Well, perhaps because they prefer to spend more time to optimize their code for BSD as they religiously against Linux.
My point is: don't try to compare oranges againsta apples unless you really specify the comparisson.
J2EE is over-bloated in order to be useful, but that kills it perform fast on small hardware (if to run at all). J2ME can run on really small hardware, but it lacks most of features people need for standalone applications. No need to mention Java GUI - its unfamouse SWING, which is just a joke.
Talking about cross-platform: Java cannot run on all platforms as Linux does. Well, unless you begin to count JDK-1.0.8 which just another useless kludge.
Should I remind you that Sun is doing everything to lock you in to its Java technologies? Still not convienced? Then where is the source code of JVM and JDK? Again, don't show me any 1.0.8 - nobody will use it now anyway.
My point is to support Twisted Python: it works on Linux (and thus on way more platforms than java). You can use a native code for any critical parts and scripts for flexibility. And it won't require GHz and GB from your hardware. It's as compact as J2ME and as functional as J2EE. Java cann never deliver such compactness and functionality at te same time (only one or another mutually exclusively). And it's open source, so no one keeps in mind to lock you in.
Yes, you can, but I charge too much. It will be cheaper for you to order a genetically modified green elephant from the moving company.
I have it for email coming to me. It's called Spamassassin. If you are not in the white list and your content has not been used to learn the ham - forget it, your email will never rich me.
- Vegitables, growing them under the Sun;
- Ethanol, getting it from sugar or potato;
- Hydrogen, getting it from ethanol in the proposed reactor;
- Electricity, getting it from cell by oxyding the hydrogen;
- Moving parts, getting it by using electicity in the motor;
Excuse me? Doesn't it look long and ineffective?Here is what I propose:
- Sugar, growing under the special vegi-skin on human bodies under the Sun after small genetic modifications;
- Miving skeletons, after burning the sugar in muscles;
You see? Much shorter, simpler and easier. Of course, human bodies are efficient for all kinds of jobs. So modify genetically other animals, or design new ones. Byt keep the principle as simple as possible:- Tired? - Go and take a sun-bath to get some sugar in your blood.
- Too much sugar? - Go and do some job for the society.
And no more conflicts between white people and black people - we are all gonna be green by then