Here's a question: which group commits the largest amount of mass shootings, by far, than any other group? How about child molestation?
You mean per capita or by raw total numbers? Because the answer changes depending.
That's like when people push numbers of which group has killed the most in terrorist attacks... counting from September 12, 2001 onward.
Maybe we could look up who commits the most murders in the USA? Rather than the purposefully narrowed-down sub-category of "mass shootings" that doesn't include gang shootings & drive-bys either (Nice try BTW). Even without normalising per capita it's bad but if we do it's even worse.
Just look at these articles "White woman call cops on black woman" ( http://archive.fo/T4qIo archive of Metro's article)
Plot twist: They're BOTH Hispanic. Didn't stop the news from race baiting.
The NY Post too, later corrected the article but the URL itself still shows how they pushed the "white woman" angle at first ( https://nypost.com/2018/08/02/... )
They have created Schrödinger's Hispanic: They're neither black or white until a narrative need to be observed.
"involved 2,000 randomly-selected people on unemployment benefits."
That's like dipping your toe in the swimming pool and calling that a study about "Survival rate of castaways in the Antarctic".
It was known to be only of a limited time so there was still a huge motivator to get off unemployment. This was simply extended unemployment benefits. It was only offered on people on unemployment so it didn't apply to employed people who may want to find a way to end up unemployed or just quit if the rules for UBI benefits allows.
There was nothing UNIVERSAL (key word here) about it. It was an absolutely worthless study in regards to UBI. Only a full scale implementation can be a representative sample of UBI.
That was a study about "What if we extend and raise unemployment benefits".
Slashdot Mirror
80% of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes –14 times the average. (Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26)
Vast majority of serial murderers are also created by single mothers abusing their kids.
https://www.independent.co.uk/...
Funny how that is rarely mentioned in those PSAs.
It shows they're not trying at all. They WANT inflated user numbers. It's good for the stocks, it's good for selling ads.
Here's a question: which group commits the largest amount of mass shootings, by far, than any other group? How about child molestation?
You mean per capita or by raw total numbers?
Because the answer changes depending.
That's like when people push numbers of which group has killed the most in terrorist attacks ... counting from September 12, 2001 onward.
Maybe we could look up who commits the most murders in the USA? Rather than the purposefully narrowed-down sub-category of "mass shootings" that doesn't include gang shootings & drive-bys either (Nice try BTW). Even without normalising per capita it's bad but if we do it's even worse.
Just look at these articles "White woman call cops on black woman" ( http://archive.fo/T4qIo archive of Metro's article)
Plot twist: They're BOTH Hispanic. Didn't stop the news from race baiting.
The NY Post too, later corrected the article but the URL itself still shows how they pushed the "white woman" angle at first ( https://nypost.com/2018/08/02/... )
They have created Schrödinger's Hispanic: They're neither black or white until a narrative need to be observed.
... just stop using mosquito repellent.
I can't wait for USB sticks to come in 12" thick lead-lined concrete cases with free shipping from Alibaba.
Let's see the delivery guy try throwing that package across the front yard.
Their racism made him steal that package.
And had it been a white or Asian dude they would have been happy, thanked him, and wished him best of luck in his future endeavours.
That means the program did not make those people lose their "foraging skills".
During one year, with a small sample population that knew very well that the program was going to end soon.
It wasn't Universal Basic Income.
"involved 2,000 randomly-selected people on unemployment benefits."
That's like dipping your toe in the swimming pool and calling that a study about "Survival rate of castaways in the Antarctic".
It was known to be only of a limited time so there was still a huge motivator to get off unemployment. This was simply extended unemployment benefits.
It was only offered on people on unemployment so it didn't apply to employed people who may want to find a way to end up unemployed or just quit if the rules for UBI benefits allows.
There was nothing UNIVERSAL (key word here) about it. It was an absolutely worthless study in regards to UBI. Only a full scale implementation can be a representative sample of UBI.
That was a study about "What if we extend and raise unemployment benefits".