Slashdot Mirror


User: Mr+F+J+Musical-Troll

Mr+F+J+Musical-Troll's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
72
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 72

  1. Wasted on NYT on the Very Large Array · · Score: -1

    It looks like we wasted our attempts at First Post on an article that isn't even going on the front page. Like, who gives a shit about telescopes anyway.

  2. Re:Zoopy doopy doo! on New Technique Makes Most Gene Patents Irrelevant · · Score: -1
    I can assure you, that no matter how many times you claim it to be true, I did not 'fuck up' the earlier posting. Your 'bold' and 'italics' make no difference to this very simple fact.

    Sorry to disappoint you, but the only fucking up I will be doing today involves my fantastic and beautiful fiancee, and myself.

  3. ♩ First musical post! ♬ on NYT on the Very Large Array · · Score: -1
    Another one.

    This time, with a present for k0osh. Hope this helps you take your mind off all those naked guys, or whatever.

  4. Re:Jon Katz's ex b/f on New Technique Makes Most Gene Patents Irrelevant · · Score: -1
    Listen, boy, follow these easy steps and you'll feel a lot better:
    1. Visit your local newsagents.
    2. Buy a good quality heterosexual pornographic magazine.
    3. Read it (just look at the pictures) and allow your imagination to wander.
    4. Have the most thoughroughly proper wank you have ever experienced.
    5. Lie back and smile.
    Maybe then you will be cured of this ridiculous obsession with homoerotic literature.
  5. Re:Jon Katz's ex b/f on New Technique Makes Most Gene Patents Irrelevant · · Score: -1

    You ever poked a girl where she likes it?

  6. Re:Zoopy doopy doo! on New Technique Makes Most Gene Patents Irrelevant · · Score: -1

    Nice try, son, but I think you'll find that my post was squeaky clean. Seems that all that homosexual ASCII art you play with is turning you blind!

  7. Re:Jon Katz's ex b/f on New Technique Makes Most Gene Patents Irrelevant · · Score: -1

    And you call that a troll? I can do without homoerotical blowjob adverts while I skim the surfaces of (Score:-1), you illiterate cunt.

  8. Re:Hello. Will you drink my URINE? on New Technique Makes Most Gene Patents Irrelevant · · Score: -1

    At last! It is refreshing to 'see' a mostly heterosexual 'crapflood' on this web blog that appears to have been infected with 'trolls' of the 'queer variety'.

  9. Re:Zoopy doopy doo! on New Technique Makes Most Gene Patents Irrelevant · · Score: -1

    Listen, dude, just lay off the whole penis obsession thing, okay? I don't usually mind homoerotic fantasising, so long as it's in the privacy of your own bathroom with the door tightly locked, but this is a pubic forum. Have some respect.

  10. Re:Jon Katz's ex b/f on New Technique Makes Most Gene Patents Irrelevant · · Score: -1

    Why in damnation did you post that spattering of bum-nob advertising? I strongly recommend you find yourself a nice girl instead.

  11. ♫ Second musical post! ♪ on New Technique Makes Most Gene Patents Irrelevant · · Score: -1

    But probably only the third actual post in this article.

  12. ♫ First musical post! ♪ on New Technique Makes Most Gene Patents Irrelevant · · Score: -1

    Hey, I can see colours.

  13. First Musical Post? #9534; on Java Thrown Back in Windows, For Now · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hey hey chaps.

  14. Re:Telepathic Network the way to go on Yet Another "Last Mile" Option · · Score: -1

    Please cut out your tongue. Thanks.

  15. ♫ Eleventh post? on Why (Most) Software is so Bad · · Score: -1

    Do I have the honour of attaining 11th post?

  16. Re:MD5, etc. on Collapsing P2P Networks · · Score: 0, Informative
    • Finally a little question for the P2P junks out there: many people claim they get to learn new kinds of music by P2P sharing. I won't say it isn't true, but how? You still need a handle to search new stuff? You just type in random keywords, or what? Just curious, because I'd like to broaden my musical horizonts a bit.
    Some suggestions:
    • Read music magazines to get an idea of bands you might like.
    • Do a search for a band/song you like, and then, for the users that give results, search those users' music collections and download stuff you don't know.
    • Random words in the search terms.
    • Search by style. E.g. "Jazz" might bring up "The Best Of 20th Century Jazz" or "Acid Jazz Hits" albums, or something along those lines.
    • Internet radio stations. They often have a larger range of music than normal radio, and often split by style. Example: Radio Free Virgin.
    • Hang out on #mp3 channels on IRC and wait for the requests and sends to appear on the channel. Pick and choose any that sound interesting.
    • Seach lyrics sites by random words, and download those songs (useful when you want to fit a song to a specific purpose, say on a film or presentation.)
    I have had a lot of success with these methods.
  17. Re:If not the government? on Internet Routes Around South African Gov't · · Score: -1

    Don't be stupid!

  18. Re:♫ First musical post! ♪ on BPDG Not Much Of A Threat? · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Well, bugger me. An accidently anonymous post.

  19. ♫ Fourth musical post! ♪ on Organizing Data Across a Heterogeneous Net? · · Score: -1, Troll
    Forget all that shaving nonsense. Grow a long beard and play the bass guitar.

    It's a nice day out today, baby .. mmm-hmm yeh ..

  20. ♫ Third musical post! ♪ on Organizing Data Across a Heterogeneous Net? · · Score: -1, Troll

    I like reading Slashdot,
    it is music to my ears.
    But the facts are, m'lady,
    it is frequented by queers.

    Ohh yeah!
    Ohh yeah baby!

    -- Slashdot by Fleetwood Mac

  21. ♫ Second musical post! ♪ on Organizing Data Across a Heterogeneous Net? · · Score: -1, Troll
    Second musical post!

    • Featured song:
    • Blur - Coffee + TV
  22. ♫ First musical post! ♪ on Organizing Data Across a Heterogeneous Net? · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    First musical post!