Slashdot Mirror


User: techwrench

techwrench's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
84
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 84

  1. What anonymity? on Anonymous Library Cards An Option? · · Score: 1

    With the Patriot Act still in place, allowing the government to check library listings, it would not take much for 'Big Brother' to just install surveillance equipment outside the libraries to circumvent the whole issue.

  2. Disposal Tax on Whose Burden is it to Recycle Computers? · · Score: 1

    First it was CRT's, and now I got notice for LCD and plasma screens... soon it will be boards and Chips. Does anyone want to pay an extra $10 for a NIC??

  3. Wow on Zalman Showcase Massive P4 Heatsink · · Score: 1

    I must say that I am blown way by the size of that fan...

  4. Re:Only 60%? on 60% Of U.S. Believe Life Exists On Other Planets · · Score: 1

    While I believe that quote is basically correct, I think that perhaps the zealous believers are the bane of learning.

  5. Re:Why is Yahoo! at fault? on Oregon Woman Sues Yahoo for $3 Million · · Score: 1

    If an image is taken of you, the phototgrapher is the holder of the copyright, not the subject of the image.

  6. Information vs Office12? on Information Overload Overblown, Says Gates · · Score: 1

    What does Office 12 release have to do with prioritizing the massive influx of data that we recieve everyday?

  7. This is nothing new from Microsoft. on Microsoft Developing Windows for Low-End Machines · · Score: 1

    This was spoken about 4 or 5 years ago, about the time that XP came out; Server based apps delivering content to barebones PC's. This marketing scheme was the basis of the .NET product line.

  8. Re:What % was retaliation? on Before You Fire the Company Geek · · Score: 1

    And What? Have the government (who are well on thier way to making the US a police state) control the corporate police state?

  9. Re:clearly on Microsoft Uncertain About WinFS for XP · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the reason that Microsoft is still supporting thier older OS's is due to the fact that the public still uses them, not because the newest upgrades are better. The mentality that MS has to force people to upgrade is not driven by newer and better software, but by the profits deriven from the upgrade costs that are incurred. I run Linux at home, and the only reason I upgrade is to get better drivers for my supported hardware.