← Back to Users
ofranja's activity in the archive.
Object oriented programming, the "crystal healing therapy" of computer science.
Also, a lot of programmers might be willing to relocate if needed, but would never relocate to the US. Which is exactly my case, BTW.
1) NTFS, fast? Have you ever heard about ReiserFS? BTW, with ReiserFS v4, journaling is "obsolete technology". 2) Windows does not support process hierarchy present in POSIX systems. 3) You may change the window manager on win32: Litestep is what you want.
Imagina ele tendo que lidar com um sistema de cobranca de caixa feito em GNU/Linux, ainda por cima.. ;-)
First line at http://www.iht.com/articles/115291.html: "SAO PAOLO With a told-you-so [...]" 1) It's not 'PAOLO', it's 'PAULO'. 2) It's not 'SAO', it's 'S~AO' (the ~ goes on top of the A, but this editbox isn't allowing me to post that). 3) Unicode is good, slashdot. Embrace it. That's it.
LOL. IMHO, if a Brazilian had scored this, it would have - at lest - score 3 (+ Funny!).
Object oriented programming, the "crystal healing therapy" of computer science.
Also, a lot of programmers might be willing to relocate if needed, but would never relocate to the US. Which is exactly my case, BTW.
1) NTFS, fast? Have you ever heard about ReiserFS? BTW, with ReiserFS v4, journaling is "obsolete technology".
2) Windows does not support process hierarchy present in POSIX systems.
3) You may change the window manager on win32: Litestep is what you want.
Imagina ele tendo que lidar com um sistema de cobranca de caixa feito em GNU/Linux, ainda por cima.. ;-)
First line at http://www.iht.com/articles/115291.html:
"SAO PAOLO With a told-you-so [...]"
1) It's not 'PAOLO', it's 'PAULO'.
2) It's not 'SAO', it's 'S~AO' (the ~ goes on top of the A, but this editbox isn't allowing me to post that).
3) Unicode is good, slashdot. Embrace it.
That's it.
LOL. IMHO, if a Brazilian had scored this, it would have - at lest - score 3 (+ Funny!).