So far I find my Zaurus to be really useful. When out and about I use it as an mp3
player, play games on it, and my new hobby -- searching for wireless networks.
At home I SSH into it and use it as if it was just another headless linux box. It will be even better once the
Debian port is
complete and there is easy access to all of the Debian Arm packages.
There are not that many Tru64 boxes laying around. Good thing that this place lets you sign up for shell accounts where you can test drive your programs.
While I agree with you on the NetBSD point, calling the slashdot editors "linux-infatuated rejects", only shows
that you might be a bsd-infatuated reject.
X11 on Mac OS X is a not an issue. You can find X11 for Mac OS X here. Any halfway competent
*NIX user can find and install it without any problems. Or you could install fink and just apt-get install it.
That's exactly what Debian does _NOT_ need. The reason Debian just works and is so stable is that the maintainers take their time and put alot of effort into properly integrating each package into the Debian system. If you want decentralized software that hasn't been tested with the rest of your distro, you might as well just compile from source.
I'm having trouble finding a working version for Linux or Mac OS X. Can anybody point me in the right direction? ArmyOpsRecon.exe doesn't seem to work for me.
Why not just go with Mac OS 11. Apple has repeatedly stated that that the X is to be pronounced as 10, and not X.
I prefer sequential naming schemes anyway. Do we really need something like Mac OS XP?
Slashdot Mirror
So far I find my Zaurus to be really useful. When out and about I use it as an mp3 player, play games on it, and my new hobby -- searching for wireless networks. At home I SSH into it and use it as if it was just another headless linux box. It will be even better once the Debian port is complete and there is easy access to all of the Debian Arm packages.
There are not that many Tru64 boxes laying around. Good thing that this place lets you sign up for shell accounts where you can test drive your programs.
While I agree with you on the NetBSD point, calling the slashdot editors "linux-infatuated rejects", only shows that you might be a bsd-infatuated reject.
X11 on Mac OS X is a not an issue. You can find X11 for Mac OS X here. Any halfway competent *NIX user can find and install it without any problems. Or you could install fink and just apt-get install it.
I was in the shower when this was announced. This is one of those moments you will tell your kids about in the future. Go Debian!
That's exactly what Debian does _NOT_ need. The reason Debian just works and is so stable is that the maintainers take their time and put alot of effort into properly integrating each package into the Debian system. If you want decentralized software that hasn't been tested with the rest of your distro, you might as well just compile from source.
When are we going to see some IMAX pron.
For some interesting reading related to this article, take a look at the text files that come with the exploit that was used to crack this honeypot.
Not sure what this story has to do with Apache. Maybe somebody should preview things before they post.
I'm having trouble finding a working version for Linux or Mac OS X. Can anybody point me in the right direction? ArmyOpsRecon.exe doesn't seem to work for me.
Why not just go with Mac OS 11. Apple has repeatedly stated that that the X is to be pronounced as 10, and not X. I prefer sequential naming schemes anyway. Do we really need something like Mac OS XP?