I might be quite wrong here. I thought there was a mention in the latest trunk of Firefox about some fix to do with slashdot and that damn gap there. I am not sure if this relates to this bug or not. But for the moment crtl + -- Crtl - works well enough.
Being a product of the TV generation. Don't they say that when one of your senses diminishes another one improves. Since we all know stearing at a computer screen for long periods of time makes you blind stands to reason then that your hearing must improve.
This sounds so indicitive of experiments Nikola Tesla was working on. Why is science in it's nature so slow to release what was probably known a long time ago. I guess we as pple are not ready for the knowledge?. Bah crap. Ohh well look up Nikola Tesla some time might make for interesting reading if you into the world of electricity and science.
What I would like to know is . WHY is it assumed that standards compliance is not possible to maintain if some form of compatibility logic is introduced into the browser. Surely your base should be close to 100% standard compliant and the rest should be the whistles. Ie. why force designers to be compliant and just fix the damn browser to acomodate for their lazyness. Beggers can't be choosers as they say. And lets face it no matter how good mozilla apparently gets until it has more of a foot hold it is a pointless debate. The redesign time for most sites is quite involving and long and its plain nuts to ask everyone to redesign their site. I have nothing against standards I just don't see that the browser needs to break its standard compliance to include extra non compliant features. I use both Mozilla and ie. but I do find myself forced into IE alot becasue Mozilla just cant do the job on some pages. So by this arguemnt I would what wait for them to fix the sites or get the job done with IE?. What path do you think is more cost effective in my time?. Well just my 2 cents worth.
Slashdot Mirror
I might be quite wrong here. I thought there was a mention in the latest trunk of Firefox about some fix to do with slashdot and that damn gap there. I am not sure if this relates to this bug or not. But for the moment crtl + -- Crtl - works well enough.
Being a product of the TV generation. Don't they say that when one of your senses diminishes another one improves. Since we all know stearing at a computer screen for long periods of time makes you blind stands to reason then that your hearing must improve.
And I am sticking to that analogy.
This sounds so indicitive of experiments Nikola Tesla was working on. Why is science in it's nature so slow to release what was probably known a long time ago. I guess we as pple are not ready for the knowledge?. Bah crap. Ohh well look up Nikola Tesla some time might make for interesting reading if you into the world of electricity and science.
What I would like to know is . WHY is it assumed that standards compliance is not possible to maintain if some form of compatibility logic is introduced into the browser. Surely your base should be close to 100% standard compliant and the rest should be the whistles. Ie. why force designers to be compliant and just fix the damn browser to acomodate for their lazyness. Beggers can't be choosers as they say. And lets face it no matter how good mozilla apparently gets until it has more of a foot hold it is a pointless debate. The redesign time for most sites is quite involving and long and its plain nuts to ask everyone to redesign their site. I have nothing against standards I just don't see that the browser needs to break its standard compliance to include extra non compliant features. I use both Mozilla and ie. but I do find myself forced into IE alot becasue Mozilla just cant do the job on some pages. So by this arguemnt I would what wait for them to fix the sites or get the job done with IE?. What path do you think is more cost effective in my time?. Well just my 2 cents worth.