Apple really succeeds with their laptops. That is not the problem. Desktop performance is where the porting to x86 would be (arguably) usefull.
Apple would still make the hardware, it just would have a different processor. They are not about to allow clones again. The machine still would need an Apple ROM to boot. And Apple will never release a two button mouse, as for the uninitiated, they are too confusing.
of course it is unbreakable.
Can't you see that you have to have the ciphertext BEFORE you can encrypt the plaintext. If the ciphertext means nothing, then you canst decrypt it.
Are you running jaguar? If you are, that could make a big difference, as your GPU would be doing most of the havy lifting. Also, the UI server isnt the only thing that uses processes. Programs have to use CPU time to figure out what to display to the window manager.
or that AOL cds are on your doorstep, or your neighbor's.
Apple really succeeds with their laptops. That is not the problem. Desktop performance is where the porting to x86 would be (arguably) usefull. Apple would still make the hardware, it just would have a different processor. They are not about to allow clones again. The machine still would need an Apple ROM to boot. And Apple will never release a two button mouse, as for the uninitiated, they are too confusing.
you must realize there is no ciphertext. it is you who is encrypted.
of course it is unbreakable. Can't you see that you have to have the ciphertext BEFORE you can encrypt the plaintext. If the ciphertext means nothing, then you canst decrypt it.
Yeah, it happened to me, playing it from my friends dvdrom drive.
Are you running jaguar? If you are, that could make a big difference, as your GPU would be doing most of the havy lifting. Also, the UI server isnt the only thing that uses processes. Programs have to use CPU time to figure out what to display to the window manager.
you ask: "what is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?", and then "What do you mean? An african or european swallow?"