Well, first of all, they weren't even running the wireless. They bought all of their equipment from a third party, and were using the third parties software, and servers. So, how could you possibly make such a claim? Their train services were in no way connected to the wireless, they simply paid someone else to do it, and got a share of the profits, it's as simple as that. Claiming that their switchboards and such are vulnerable based upon the mere fact that a third party service was is completely absurd.
Are you kidding? There is NO WAY of telling if someone is blocking popups or not. Diff the IP request logs? If what you mean is see if they ever grabbed the images or page (via access_log or similar) then what is to stop someone from using one of those shitty win32 popup blockers that dont even really block them. They simply LOAD the popup, and then close the window, you can even see it happen in front of you. But what if someone was to simply "hide" these windows when they came up? And then it closed them in the background. It is a simple enough solution to put your little sham in its place. Stupidass post ville.
I would like to just add that I am 15 myself and you seem like a little nerd with no friends. I mean, you ran the lights for your plays c'mon bro, get a life. I would also like to add that script kiddies, and I believe this includes your self infact HAVE NO SKILL. That is why you are called script kiddies you know howto do nothing but run `sh hax0r.sh`. You break into systems by using exploits which have been around for in most cases years. You have no skills to apply or assets to help a company. Go learn how your system works, and the true workings of tcp/ip (or another protocal for that matter). I can bet a good amount of money that you have no idea what your system is doing 99% of the time. Script kiddies will always be script kiddies, no more, no less. No knowledge, no understanding, no clue.
I am only in the 10th grade and I know I wouldnt take this class even if it was offered to me. I knox enough to test out of the certification (well maybe not fn rh). But, I know I would not take it, its just a waste of my time. I'll get paid about 4 times as much straight outa college majoring in eecs (electrical engineering and computer science). If you really wanna learn computers dont go for some pos 'commercial' linux system. Go out and learn how to make your own system. Maybe you can have a certification course some day:P
your an fscking moron. I bet you dont have the slightest clue of any *nix or security for that matter. Or you would know, a redhat box (as bad as they can be) can be just as secure as an openbsd system. I use openbsd, freebsd, debian, etc. I know linux has an incredibly future in the server market. Sadly I know openbsd will not. It will always be for the hardcore users and no one else. Or perhaps the knowledgable administrator will use it for edge network devices.
I am not here to ofend any BSD user as I am one myself, my main workstation is infact running OpenBSD. But I must say that most "highend" servers are going to be dual processor systems and only freebsd supports this and well... linux does a MUCH better job at distributing threads to seperate CPU's, this is supposed to be fixed in FreeBSD 5.0 so I guess we will see
Slashdot Mirror
Well, first of all, they weren't even running the wireless. They bought all of their equipment from a third party, and were using the third parties software, and servers. So, how could you possibly make such a claim? Their train services were in no way connected to the wireless, they simply paid someone else to do it, and got a share of the profits, it's as simple as that. Claiming that their switchboards and such are vulnerable based upon the mere fact that a third party service was is completely absurd.
Are you kidding? There is NO WAY of telling if someone is blocking popups or not. Diff the IP request logs? If what you mean is see if they ever grabbed the images or page (via access_log or similar) then what is to stop someone from using one of those shitty win32 popup blockers that dont even really block them. They simply LOAD the popup, and then close the window, you can even see it happen in front of you. But what if someone was to simply "hide" these windows when they came up? And then it closed them in the background. It is a simple enough solution to put your little sham in its place. Stupidass post ville.
I would like to just add that I am 15 myself and you seem like a little nerd with no friends. I mean, you ran the lights for your plays c'mon bro, get a life. I would also like to add that script kiddies, and I believe this includes your self infact HAVE NO SKILL. That is why you are called script kiddies you know howto do nothing but run `sh hax0r.sh`. You break into systems by using exploits which have been around for in most cases years. You have no skills to apply or assets to help a company. Go learn how your system works, and the true workings of tcp/ip (or another protocal for that matter). I can bet a good amount of money that you have no idea what your system is doing 99% of the time. Script kiddies will always be script kiddies, no more, no less. No knowledge, no understanding, no clue.
I am only in the 10th grade and I know I wouldnt take this class even if it was offered to me. I knox enough to test out of the certification (well maybe not fn rh). But, I know I would not take it, its just a waste of my time. I'll get paid about 4 times as much straight outa college majoring in eecs (electrical engineering and computer science). If you really wanna learn computers dont go for some pos 'commercial' linux system. Go out and learn how to make your own system. Maybe you can have a certification course some day :P
your an fscking moron. I bet you dont have the slightest clue of any *nix or security for that matter. Or you would know, a redhat box (as bad as they can be) can be just as secure as an openbsd system. I use openbsd, freebsd, debian, etc. I know linux has an incredibly future in the server market. Sadly I know openbsd will not. It will always be for the hardcore users and no one else. Or perhaps the knowledgable administrator will use it for edge network devices.
I am not here to ofend any BSD user as I am one myself, my main workstation is infact running OpenBSD. But I must say that most "highend" servers are going to be dual processor systems and only freebsd supports this and well... linux does a MUCH better job at distributing threads to seperate CPU's, this is supposed to be fixed in FreeBSD 5.0 so I guess we will see