I've heard the same argument: "I don't need a phone with all that crap." For people who only want voice communication, that's great, but some people miss the point: many of us don't buy "phones" to yak at each other, but rather for mobile computing which happens to let us make phone calls as well. I was ready to ditch my last cell in favor of a Galaxy tablet with a bluetooth headset, but they ended up being crippled in that respect (and massively expensive), so I went with the Galaxy S instead.
My Android device isn't a "phone" any more than an automobile is a giant mobile cigarette lighter. Yes, you can light a cigarette with it (and also listen to radio and keep warm in cold weather, etc.), but the primary function of the machine is for transportation. The primary function of a "smartphone" is as a portable Internet-connected computer.
To be fair: it is kind of pathetic that I can't wait 20 minutes to check my email, etc. while I'm walking or riding the bus, but there you go.:-/
"that 1% of people who know the distinction are the ones that matter to his career"
Possibly maybe, but I've worked for (/been hired by) people who had little or no technical knowledge. The CS degree ought to be enough to get your foot in the door for an interview (I could be wrong, it's been years since I had to go through that...).
Personally I wouldn't want to work for anyone who would toss my resume just because I had experience in tech support (which I did as a college job, BTW).
Wow, some of us have passionate opinions about this distinction...:-/ As far as 99% of the human race is concerned, there is no difference between CS and IT, we're all just "computer guys".
BTW I got my Master's in CS, and I've been working "in IT" for over 10 years (as a database developer). I'm also a part-time instructor (of database development) in a community college; while the CS background definitely helped get my foot in the door there, I think the practical experience pulled just as much weight.
My advice: take whatever decent job you can find, even if it's a lowly "IT" job. Consider it part of your overall career experience; diversity (such as it is) is an asset.
What's to keep us from storing energy in a different form? Say, use excess solar-generated electricity to run a motor which lifts a heavy weight (converting it to potential energy, which can later be used to spin a turbine and generate more electricity)? This is the same process that a grandfather clock uses (and yes, I know that Neil Gaiman described it in Anathem); there's some mechanical overhead, but it's more sustainable than chemical batteries...
For that matter, why not use excess solar electricity to separate hydrogen from water molecules, creating fuel?
I'm forced to disagree with you. Any technical fix will eventually be overridden by some bent-tech who wants a promotion (or his own internet business). It's like the drug trade; make it more difficult to import the stuff, and you just allow the clever dealers to charge more $$$, because they're the only ones who can get the stuff...
I think the only way to significantly reduce spam (we'll probably never eliminate it) is to make it unprofitable. Spammers don't care if they're hated by 95% of the population, they don't mind being ostracized or occasionally persecuted; they can laugh it off sitting in their $1 million mansions, sipping Cristal.
If anybody figues a way to do this, I'll nominate them for canonization. Bottom line, though: even if e-mail spam and popup ads disappeared tomorrow, the sharks would still be there, looking for a new medium. If they discover a method to broadcast ads into our tooth-fillings or onto the inside of our eyelids, you can bet they'll do it...
Re:I'm sure everyone is going to do this.
on
Haiku vs Spam
·
· Score: 1
Spammers forge message,
Violate copyright law.
Pay me royalties!
Slashdot Mirror
I've heard the same argument: "I don't need a phone with all that crap." For people who only want voice communication, that's great, but some people miss the point: many of us don't buy "phones" to yak at each other, but rather for mobile computing which happens to let us make phone calls as well. I was ready to ditch my last cell in favor of a Galaxy tablet with a bluetooth headset, but they ended up being crippled in that respect (and massively expensive), so I went with the Galaxy S instead.
:-/
My Android device isn't a "phone" any more than an automobile is a giant mobile cigarette lighter. Yes, you can light a cigarette with it (and also listen to radio and keep warm in cold weather, etc.), but the primary function of the machine is for transportation. The primary function of a "smartphone" is as a portable Internet-connected computer.
To be fair: it is kind of pathetic that I can't wait 20 minutes to check my email, etc. while I'm walking or riding the bus, but there you go.
You passed the test!
"that 1% of people who know the distinction are the ones that matter to his career"
Possibly maybe, but I've worked for (/been hired by) people who had little or no technical knowledge. The CS degree ought to be enough to get your foot in the door for an interview (I could be wrong, it's been years since I had to go through that...).
Personally I wouldn't want to work for anyone who would toss my resume just because I had experience in tech support (which I did as a college job, BTW).
Wow, some of us have passionate opinions about this distinction... :-/ As far as 99% of the human race is concerned, there is no difference between CS and IT, we're all just "computer guys".
BTW I got my Master's in CS, and I've been working "in IT" for over 10 years (as a database developer). I'm also a part-time instructor (of database development) in a community college; while the CS background definitely helped get my foot in the door there, I think the practical experience pulled just as much weight.
My advice: take whatever decent job you can find, even if it's a lowly "IT" job. Consider it part of your overall career experience; diversity (such as it is) is an asset.
zyrkyr at yahoo would also be grateful for an invite (thx!)
Right. You aren't required to give them a user account on your machine, but they're not required to open a firewall port for you either...
A guy here in Oregon had the same idea, but without the architectural finesse: http://www.airplanehome.com/
What's to keep us from storing energy in a different form? Say, use excess solar-generated electricity to run a motor which lifts a heavy weight (converting it to potential energy, which can later be used to spin a turbine and generate more electricity)? This is the same process that a grandfather clock uses (and yes, I know that Neil Gaiman described it in Anathem); there's some mechanical overhead, but it's more sustainable than chemical batteries... For that matter, why not use excess solar electricity to separate hydrogen from water molecules, creating fuel?
Oh shut up.
I'm forced to disagree with you. Any technical fix will eventually be overridden by some bent-tech who wants a promotion (or his own internet business). It's like the drug trade; make it more difficult to import the stuff, and you just allow the clever dealers to charge more $$$, because they're the only ones who can get the stuff...
I think the only way to significantly reduce spam (we'll probably never eliminate it) is to make it unprofitable. Spammers don't care if they're hated by 95% of the population, they don't mind being ostracized or occasionally persecuted; they can laugh it off sitting in their $1 million mansions, sipping Cristal.
If anybody figues a way to do this, I'll nominate them for canonization. Bottom line, though: even if e-mail spam and popup ads disappeared tomorrow, the sharks would still be there, looking for a new medium. If they discover a method to broadcast ads into our tooth-fillings or onto the inside of our eyelids, you can bet they'll do it...
Spammers forge message,
Violate copyright law.
Pay me royalties!