anytime an application needing plant fiber comes along, there's always a group that starts extolling the virtues of hemp for the purpose, because they want industrial hemp to be in common use to hide their short high-THC subspecies of the stuff. Never mind there is ALWAYS other plants with higher yield per acre for any purpose and for any climate, especially in the USA. Just give it up, you silly potheads.
but those plants are much smaller than industrial hemp. If your concern is to make clothing and other fiber products, you don't have much use for MJ as a feed stock
you are silly. systems biology modeling of cells will require exascale computing, so will simulations in chemistry of miilions or more atoms for hundredth of a second or more. Lattice simulations for physics are demanding them too.
25% is just for U.S.A. trees (got that stat from U.S. Forest Service, agency of Dept. of Ag), I've heard rumors there are also trees elsewhere in the world
nonsense, human population will peak in 2075 and decline thereafter. Increasing the food supply to the levels of luxury makes the breeding rate go below 2.1 per couple and population growth goes negative. There is thus no problem in the longer term
I'd have added the phrase, "and the other half will find greater habitable range".....or even "less those that will adapt by various means including activating long-dormant parts of their genome, evolution, changing behaviour, etc.
the UN is a bunch of elitist oligarchs who want to subvert the sovereignty of nations to cram their world view down various countries throat. The United States should give two hours notice to vacate then demolish the HQ building.
The state does not provide for my medical bills; I have to pay high insurance rates to a private company and also that part of the bill which insurance does not cover. So the state certainly has no right to stick their nose in my business.
Actually no, a proper foundation in science and engineering as part of a well-rounded education will keep technology from seeming like magic. For example, merely knowing how to program will not give a person insight into how wireless communication works, or how undersea fibre repeaters operate, or how GPS can provide a position.
I think every one should learn public speaking, to help effectively communicate ideas.
I think everyone should learn to cook well for more than one person, there is nothing like "breaking bread" with others to build relationships from the most fundamental of human needs.
I think everyone should learn to play a musical instrument or make visual art or poetry, for that stimulates the parts of the brain that mere technical subjects do not.
I think everyone should study philosophy, for that is how humans have tried to make a conceptual framework to treat others and to live (religion being a subset of philosophy)
any of these things is far more important than making instructions for a binary computational device to process.
the nanny-state mentality that is gripping government first world countries will soon forbid the growing of beef-life tissue because of its increasing the risk of arterial clogging, etc.
the second is a quality consideration, I will accept nothing less than the flavor and texture of the very finest beef cuts in vat cultured tissue. else I will continue to support the inhumane raising and slaughtering of cattle. Also, I reserve the right to throw tissue cultures on the grill over charcoal, concerns of carcinogens be damned.
Slashdot Mirror
the toaster thing would be hilarious if a slashdot member with four digit or less ID number really tried it and died.
you forget we're talking of the reasonings of a third party, not about what would actually work or be logical
there are verses saying to be sober though
if you want a boring life you could obey them
biology is divided on the "subspecies" vs. varieties issue, see wikipedia for Cannabis
you could hide them in properly designed tanks in a building that was also used for industrial hemp research.
anytime an application needing plant fiber comes along, there's always a group that starts extolling the virtues of hemp for the purpose, because they want industrial hemp to be in common use to hide their short high-THC subspecies of the stuff. Never mind there is ALWAYS other plants with higher yield per acre for any purpose and for any climate, especially in the USA. Just give it up, you silly potheads.
but those plants are much smaller than industrial hemp. If your concern is to make clothing and other fiber products, you don't have much use for MJ as a feed stock
you are misinformed, the position of the solstice sun has indeed changed and temples get out of alignment
For example:
http://www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk/egyptkarnak.htm
you are silly. systems biology modeling of cells will require exascale computing, so will simulations in chemistry of miilions or more atoms for hundredth of a second or more. Lattice simulations for physics are demanding them too.
25% is just for U.S.A. trees (got that stat from U.S. Forest Service, agency of Dept. of Ag), I've heard rumors there are also trees elsewhere in the world
nonsense, human population will peak in 2075 and decline thereafter. Increasing the food supply to the levels of luxury makes the breeding rate go below 2.1 per couple and population growth goes negative. There is thus no problem in the longer term
you are a bad teacher, quit immediately.
The truth is that the forests of the United States alone soak up more than 25% of human produced carbon each year.
"almost"
I'd have added the phrase, "and the other half will find greater habitable range".....or even "less those that will adapt by various means including activating long-dormant parts of their genome, evolution, changing behaviour, etc.
animals that are basically insects from the sea are permitted in some sects of Islam (such as lobsters)
the UN is a bunch of elitist oligarchs who want to subvert the sovereignty of nations to cram their world view down various countries throat. The United States should give two hours notice to vacate then demolish the HQ building.
But the objects are bolted on in Java, it is a procedural partially 00 language.
As for your "Add 1 to X", I'd retort myCamelCaseMethodSoTypicalOfAJavaDweeb()
A public speaking class will indeed teach you to value your audience's time, and take the effort to make a speech worthy of it.
The state does not provide for my medical bills; I have to pay high insurance rates to a private company and also that part of the bill which insurance does not cover. So the state certainly has no right to stick their nose in my business.
Actually no, a proper foundation in science and engineering as part of a well-rounded education will keep technology from seeming like magic. For example, merely knowing how to program will not give a person insight into how wireless communication works, or how undersea fibre repeaters operate, or how GPS can provide a position.
"ahhhhh, 3D printers, is there anything they can't do"
"certainly Homer, they can't make doughnuts"
!!!!
".....stupid 3D printers......."
pffft. of far higher priority to most humans:
I think every one should learn public speaking, to help effectively communicate ideas.
I think everyone should learn to cook well for more than one person, there is nothing like "breaking bread" with others to build relationships from the most fundamental of human needs.
I think everyone should learn to play a musical instrument or make visual art or poetry, for that stimulates the parts of the brain that mere technical subjects do not.
I think everyone should study philosophy, for that is how humans have tried to make a conceptual framework to treat others and to live (religion being a subset of philosophy)
any of these things is far more important than making instructions for a binary computational device to process.
and java is the COBOL of the 90s that still lingers like a really rancid fart in a church long after the congregation left.
if it tastes as good as dead animal muscles and has equivalent or better nutritional value, I'm all for it
the nanny-state mentality that is gripping government first world countries will soon forbid the growing of beef-life tissue because of its increasing the risk of arterial clogging, etc.
the second is a quality consideration, I will accept nothing less than the flavor and texture of the very finest beef cuts in vat cultured tissue. else I will continue to support the inhumane raising and slaughtering of cattle. Also, I reserve the right to throw tissue cultures on the grill over charcoal, concerns of carcinogens be damned.