Slashdot Mirror


Possible Graphene Alternative Made From Hemp Waste

MTorrice writes "A low-cost chemical process can turn hemp fiber into carbon nanomaterials. Researchers used the materials to make devices called supercapacitors that provide quick bursts of electrical energy. Supercapacitors made with the hemp nanosheets put out more power than commercial devices can." According to one of the authors, "Hemp bast is a nanocomposite made up of layers of lignin, hemicellulose, and crystalline cellulose ... If you process it the right way, it separates into nanosheets similar to graphene." Perhaps the process could be applied to related plants (hops?) too.

212 comments

  1. Pot solves everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If only pot were legal, and free, we could all just sit around getting high all the time and the world would be a better place. Government will provide what we need by taking it from evil rich people.

    Yay, free pot!

    1. Re:Pot solves everything by KGIII · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Pot. Is there anything it can't do? /might be a little high right now actually

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Pot solves everything by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Plot twist: Marijuana summons Cthulhu to destroy the world. The "assholes" knew this whole time, they genuinely were acting in our best interests. Had they told us the reason why they wanted it illegal, we'd laugh them off. They were hoping we could get to the point where we could fight back, sometime in 2050, but no, the dirty hippies won and we were no match for the ancient ones.

    3. Re:Pot solves everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or, alternatively (and quite possibly much more likely), the a**holes are in league with Cthulhu, and are keeping cannabis illegal so we don't find out the truth - that they ARE the bloodsucking minions of evil.

    4. Re:Pot solves everything by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pot. Is there anything it can't do? /might be a little high right now actually

      It can't call the kettle black.

    5. Re:Pot solves everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wooooooooooshhhh

    6. Re:Pot solves everything by Molochi · · Score: 2, Funny

      You laugh, but marijuana in larger doses is said to induce "paranoia" and "hallucinations". However, these are just the codewords the government use to hide the fact that your pineal gland is being stimulated and re-activated. Anyone that has seen the documentary From Beyond, can imagine what will happen if this drug reached a critical mass of use and lowered The Veil that that separates THEM from us.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    7. Re:Pot solves everything by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tech epicenter moves from Santa Clara to Humboldt county.

      "Dude! Where's the check for our startup money. The guy from ImpossibleVentures was here, and I KNOW I put the cheque SOMEWHERE!"

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    8. Re:Pot solves everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude, can you score me some of that paranoia and hallucination bud? I'm outa those Amsterdam "space cakes".

                Seriously loads of religions around the time of modern mans emergence of conscience utilized massive amounts of cannabis. Even the Bible has been shown entymologically to give a recipe for psychoactive "anointing oil" . The widely accepted wrong translation of "calmus" yields what amounts to cannabis. If calmus were used for this oil, it would have produced a deadly, but briefly Ecstasy-like trip. If you accept cannabis as the ingredient, then the bible and the amount of hash eating,"incense filled tents" and anointing begin to make sense to what is marketed by organized religion as mystery.

    9. Re:Pot solves everything by KGIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      LOL True. It can't do that.

      Anyhow... I'm THAT guy. The guy that smokes and doesn't actually think that legalizing it will solve all the world's problems. I'm in favor of legalization and think that it would help solve *some* problems however. It is legal for me to smoke and grow now but I still think it should be legalized and subject to reasonable taxation.

      In case you're curious, I got my card because I have issues sleeping. I still have plenty of trouble sleeping but now I get to smoke weed legally. It hasn't helped though it does ease the paranoia to imbibe legally.

      I figure it would help lower budgets and stop us from incarcerating people for that particular victimless crime.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:Pot solves everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't get you sober

    11. Re:Pot solves everything by hlavac · · Score: 1

      Man, have you seen what coffee does in large doses? Or freaking water?

    12. Re:Pot solves everything by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Legalizing marijuana and hemp would actually solve a lot of problems though. As you say we could stop locking all these people up for a mostly harmless activity. But it would also open up hemp as an industrial resource. As I'm sure you know hemp is useful for all kinds of stuff from textiles to paper to seed oil and meal. It grows fast and has little need for pesticides. But we can't grow it domestically because of our stupid prohibition.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    13. Re:Pot solves everything by isorox · · Score: 1

      LOL True. It can't do that.

      Anyhow... I'm THAT guy. The guy that smokes and doesn't actually think that legalizing it will solve all the world's problems. I'm in favor of legalization and think that it would help solve *some* problems however. It is legal for me to smoke and grow now but I still think it should be legalized and subject to reasonable taxation.

      In case you're curious, I got my card because I have issues sleeping. I still have plenty of trouble sleeping but now I get to smoke weed legally. It hasn't helped though it does ease the paranoia to imbibe legally.

      I figure it would help lower budgets and stop us from incarcerating people for that particular victimless crime.

      I'm the guy that's never smoked, never will, and I find the very idea disgusting. However I'm all for it to be legalised (at home, in public -- like on the street or in parks, it should be banned along with tobacco)

      I have problems sleeping too. It's called an 11 month old who's teething.

  2. Marijuana? by mi · · Score: 1

    I wonder, if marijuana plants can be used for same... A close enough relative to hemp for the latter to be banned in some places...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Marijuana? by WillgasM · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're the same species, so yeah, probably close enough.

    2. Re:Marijuana? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      but those plants are much smaller than industrial hemp. If your concern is to make clothing and other fiber products, you don't have much use for MJ as a feed stock

    3. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So close is the same damn thing!

    4. Re:Marijuana? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Only when they grow it indoors.

      It is the exact same plant, cannabis sativa.

    5. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same plant, it's just a matter of THC content in any particular strain.

      Another reason America can fuck right off.

    6. Re:Marijuana? by pspahn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed, it's the same plant in the same way that a Yorkshire Terrier is the same animal as a Golden Retriever. Only through selective breeding did they reduce the THC concentrations low enough that the plants couldn't be practically used for psychoactive contents.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    7. Re:Marijuana? by WillgasM · · Score: 4, Funny

      And when you make them into hot dogs, they all taste relatively the same.

    8. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banned in some places, like the entire US of A, except with a difficult to get permit. What a ridiculous country!

    9. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      They're the same plant. Hemp (both industrial and medicinal strains) were banned because:
      a) there was hysteria over growing opium addiction, and the confusion about hashish (which was, at the time, a foreign and relatively unknown substance) lead some people to believe it was a form of opium
      b) it threatened the massive paper and fibre industries
      c) the 'top' media entrepreneurs at the time had investments in (b) and used their media empires to stoke the fear surrounding (a) to see hemp banned in the US alongside opium; then other countries followed because of the pressure put upon them by the US government

      A classic story of capital triumphing over Good Things.

    10. Re:Marijuana? by TrentTheThief · · Score: 3, Informative

      And since all this process requires are the stalks, then for all intents and purposes, yes. It is the same plant.

      The buds, which have recreational and medicinal uses aren't being used. The key word there is lignin. They're using the long, fiberous material not the buds.

    11. Re:Marijuana? by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

      And just like those two Canis Lupus Familiaris any two Cannabis Sativa plants will breed and are thus one species.

      Actually hemp production focused far more on producing good fiber than reducing THC content. At least until very recently. The THC reduction was just a side effect no one cared about, not until we started having modern drug laws anyway.

    12. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And indica, and ruderalis.

    13. Re:Marijuana? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Those are not generally used for hemp. The last one is way too short.

      The common cannabis used for both medical/recreational use and hemp was what I was speaking about.

    14. Re:Marijuana? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

      And when you make them into hot dogs, they all taste relatively the same.

      Yeah, people get the munchies when they are stoned.

      Don't look at your dog that way when you get high.

      Dogs can sense when someone is thinking about eating them.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    15. Re:Marijuana? by pspahn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Entire? Not quite. It's been discussed here plenty for you to already know that there are states that have enacted legalization.

      Colorado even just recently approved the regulatory structure for stores selling pot products.

      You may certainly continue to believe what you want to believe, it's just fictional.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    16. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant. We're talking about industrial hemp here, not pot. Yes, they are the same species, but they are not the same thing and do not serve the same purpose as a crop. Industrial hemp is still mostly illegal across the board, and yes, this is ridiculous.

    17. Re:Marijuana? by pspahn · · Score: 2

      Also, here is a good article from a local magazine discussing the hemp industry here in Colorado. Westword

      Amendment 64 also doesn't require a federal permit to grow industrial hemp (as other states have done), so as it stands right now, go right ahead and grow it knowing that yours may be the landmark case that allows others to cultivate in the future.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    18. Re:Marijuana? by pspahn · · Score: 2

      Amendment 64 also doesn't require Colorado farmers to seek federal approval before growing hemp. But that doesn't mean the feds couldn't crack down if they wanted to.

      This is no different than those growing for medical and recreational purposes. Yes, the DEA can crack down if they want to, but it's not going to do any good in the long run.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    19. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a farmer in Colorado that has started raising industrial hemp. I don't know how many others will follow suit considering there is a potential market for hemp based products but not materialized demand. As industrial hemp production grows so will its uses and demand, but right now I don't expect production to boom.

    20. Re:Marijuana? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but if you get such a store, you'll lose your KFC.

      It's an unfair trade.

    21. Re:Marijuana? by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 3

      On the contrary, the real reason marijuana is illegal is due to the huge benefits of hemp and relative cheapness/ease of growth. Corporate lobbying strikes again (or struck, back in the 1930's). Do some research if you're completely lost on what I'm referring to here (I'm sure the majority are).

    22. Re:Marijuana? by sosume · · Score: 1

      More as in golden retriever vs labrador retriever .. cannabis sativa and cannabis indica.

    23. Re:Marijuana? by pspahn · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure there is plenty of demand considering anyone producing hemp products domestically (shirts, shoes, twine, etc) has to import their hemp from Canada, UK, etc.

      Which makes me wonder, if hemp is a class 1 controlled substance and is therefore illegal to grow, how is it that some hippy in the hills is able to import it from other countries?

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    24. Re:Marijuana? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Sympathies. Hopefully the Indica will be arriving in your neighborhood soon.

      Granting the best in the world is pure Sativa (Thai Haze). It's also outdoor only (18 month growing season).

      I'm looking forward to pot being fully legal, so we can get the good stuff (Thai, Panama Red etc) and stop having to smoke indoor compromise weed.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    25. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, it's the same plant in the same way that a Yorkshire Terrier is the same animal as a Golden Retriever. Only through selective breeding did they reduce the THC concentrations low enough that the plants couldn't be practically used for psychoactive contents.

      Even the low concentrations can be used. You just need to extract it, so you need a lot more of it.
      This is at the gist of why some countries are unwilling to let people grow hemp. As ridiculous it is.

    26. Re:Marijuana? by bmxeroh · · Score: 1

      And you have to give your self cancer and ride your tumor around...Which is only slightly worse but still.

      --
      Central Ohio Home Theater Installation - The Theater People
    27. Re:Marijuana? by wagnerrp · · Score: 2

      By recently, you mean hundreds of years ago. Shipping companies didn't want sailors cutting up and smoking their good hemp ropes.

    28. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now you can smoke in Colorado until the feds spot ya... The united states of America are ridiculous countries... shame Europe is turning into the same thing.

    29. Re: Marijuana? by Redmancometh · · Score: 0

      Ill take ruderalis hybrids ty. Russian bud combine w afghan ftw

    30. Re:Marijuana? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Ropes are made from the stalks of the plant. Even the most potent plant would have totally worthless stalks.

      Only the flowers are really useful for that, leaves could be a really poor substitute I guess.

    31. Re: Marijuana? by murphtall · · Score: 2

      Yup. Google "The Emperor Wests No Clothes"

    32. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but the hemp laden plant is one of the easiest things to grow; one can simply scatter seeds in a field and wait, while the THC laden plant takes very careful monitoring and nutritive attention or else you end up with hemp laden plants.

    33. Re:Marijuana? by Molochi · · Score: 2

      So which do you smoke to get high, the Yorkie? I assume there's a lower TCH concentration in the Golden Retriever.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    34. Re: Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Google "The Emperor Wests No Clothes"

      "Wears", too.

    35. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but if you get such a store, you'll lose your KFC.

      They can have my chicken when they pry it from my greasy dead fingers.

    36. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way... it will be atleast 100 years before we become that bad... :)

    37. Re:Marijuana? by ganjadude · · Score: 4, Informative

      You kind of glossed over the big issue (B). The issue was Dupont.(concerning hemp not marihuana) Dupont had just created the synthetic fibre. Dupont did not want competition. The same can be said for hurst and his wood pulp making venture. The fact that you can make as much paper on 1 acre of land with hemp yearly as it would take 30 acres of land a cycle of 20 years to produce the same amount of paper.

      This is the big reason it was banned. Now they also used the "black will rape white women" and "lazy mexicans smoke pot" as an excuse in the media (re: reefer madness for a good laugh. It is a funny movie minus the fact that they actually believed it to be true when made)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    38. Re: Marijuana? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      adam west?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    39. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yorkshire Terrier: Canis lupus familiaris
      Golden Retriever: Canis lupus familiaris
      Bulldog: Canis lupus familiaris
      Rottweiler: Canis lupus familiaris
      Poodle: Canis lupus familiaris
      Great Dane: Canis lupus familiaris

      More like Grey Wolf (Canis lupis) vs Coyote (Canis latrans)

    40. Re:Marijuana? by Hatta · · Score: 2

      It's still illegal federally. Possession of any amount is a federal misdemeanor punishable by up to 1 year in PMITA prison. Now the feds don't have the resources to widely enforce that, but they can pick and choose. It's technically still illegal across the entire country, just not regularly enforced.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    41. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to guess you also believe there's a secret room at the oil company where they keep the magical "make cars run on water" machine.

    42. Re:Marijuana? by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      No, just corporations doing what they're obliged to do. For better or worse.

    43. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only through selective breeding did they reduce the THC concentrations low enough that the plants couldn't be practically used for psychoactive contents.

      /golf clap excellent troll... even got it marked "+5 Interesting"

    44. Re: Marijuana? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Ruderalis brings nothing to the party but early harvest, that have to repeatedly back cross that with the original good bud, selecting early budding but quality children. Useful to meet mid summer demand and to avoid cops. Other then that Ruderalis is useless.

      Afghani puts you to sleep, fine if that's what your into. Thai gets you 'high'. All the best strains have good parts 'Thai highland haze' in their mix. It's impossible to grow to maturity indoors. It grows on the equator. Ignores light cycles. Buds forever but never gets ripe. In nature 18 month life cycle. Buds the size of small children. It's kids are great, but all are compromises to get it to crop indoors/away from the equator.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    45. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't look at your dog that way when you get high.

      Some dogs are just asking for it.

      Dogs can sense when someone is thinking about eating them.

      Nope. Dogs are not psychic, they're just well adapted to humans. If a dog reacts to intention, then a person provided subtle cues (aka. trying to push Fido into the oven). Not to mention most dogs wouldn't expect being eaten in the first place, but could recognize another deceased dog and react to that (and some dogs would react by trying to eat the other's remains, not cowering with innate knowledge of their own demise). If dogs could sense it psychically, they'd flee the parts of the world where people eat them.

    46. Re:Marijuana? by slick7 · · Score: 1

      I wonder, if marijuana plants can be used for same... A close enough relative to hemp for the latter to be banned in some places...

      Hemp has a longer history than this country, in fact, its documents written on hemp. Only when Hearst was suckered into buying acres of trees, did he start his campaign to switch from hemp fiber to wood pulp fiber. Let's not get started with Anslinger and his marriage into the DuPont family where hemp medicinals were pushed out for oil based chemical medicines. Watch TV ads for all the "legal" drug pushing pharmaceutical companies with all the caveats like blindness, your asshole falling out and, oh yeah, a slight case of death. Don't worry, the FDA is taking all the bribes... er.. I mean donations it can to bring you the safest drugs your health care system can bleed you dry of.

      HEMP FOR VICTORY!

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    47. Re:Marijuana? by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Ha, the irony is in the fact that there are so many federal prisons here in Colorado.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    48. Re:Marijuana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.examiner.com/images/blog/wysiwyg/image/kfcmedicalmarijuanastore.jpg

    49. Re: Marijuana? by Redmancometh · · Score: 0

      Strains with a bit of ruderalis in them have a very distinct taste. A taste I happen to like quite a bit! I know by all rights it should just taste the same as indica, but it does not. This is why I do not smoke through water (despite it being so much easier on the lungs)...I like that "freshly hewn greens" flavor. That's a rather poor way to describe it, but as a smoker knowing as much as you do, I'm sure you know what I mean. You are obviously a fount of knowledge...a bong of knowledge even.

      I use the herb as a way to relax after a long day, as my job is rather stressful. So I go home, get my household crap done, make dinner, etc, and smoke a bowl. So the afghan is perfect for me because it "slows things down" internally. This usually leads to an incredibly relaxed state, and eventually restful sleep.

      If I was the type to smoke and go to work I would smoke sativa most likely. The body high from heavy-indo is a bit much to do anything but sit at a computer.

      PS: You seem to know a lot. Why is it that know matter what GOOD strain whether sativa or indo dominant doesn't do what schwag does. When I smoked schwag/reggie I would giggle and giggle, and get into all kinds of shenanigans. I have recently re-experienced this phenomenon.
      When I buy good indica I just feel extremely relaxed. A very nice heavy body high. With sativa I get a head high with minor visual changes. I feel more focused, sharper, and oddly enough much more serious.

      Why does schwag (in general) have wildly different effects? Or is this just me and a few of my friends who have this experience.

    50. Re: Marijuana? by Redmancometh · · Score: 0

      I've never heard of this "Thai highland haze," but I'm only a casual connoisseur. Tese sounds like the buds they would grow in heaven. These sounds like the buds from cheech and chong nice dreams that were supposed to be "ridiculous."

  3. Great! by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    My ashtray is full of carbon nanomaterials stemming from hemp products.

    Am I rich now?

    1. Re:Great! by WillgasM · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've already patented the process you're alluding to.

    2. Re:Great! by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Depends on how much of the raw material for your carbonized hemp nanomaterials you can produce and distribute. Folks who manage to efficiently ramp production of such materials up to industrial scales with proper distribution networks do indeed get quite rich --- but just having a lab prototype rarely makes researchers much money.

    3. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *blows smoke over your head*

    4. Re:Great! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, your tech is all vaporware.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:Great! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Ashes white-colored because the carbon has combined with oxygen and flown away. You have no carbon materials of any kind there.

    6. Re:Great! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Took me a second to see you already beat me to the punchline and even executed it much better. All carbon is burned up.

    7. Re:Great! by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      "Took me a second to see you already beat me to the punchline and even executed it much better. All carbon is burned up."

      Yes, it happily combined with oxygen and they're lying together in my ashtray.

    8. Re:Great! by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Carbon dioxide that is warmer than ambient air will float away. Unless you happen to keep your thermostat below -80 degrees Celsius.

    9. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's too fast, man! Nobody using this process can patent anything very fast. It is not .. mmmlam ds d

  4. Nah. by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 0

    The researchers was just so high they think they did it. They didn't realize they failed miserably.

  5. wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    legalize it!!
    Hemp growing is illegal in the US despite the numerous benefits it can provide

    maybe its time to stop letting big business create laws that exist only to benefit their profit margins

    1. Re:wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      United States

      Colorado [79], Vermont, and North Dakota have passed laws enabling hemp licensure. Both states are waiting for permission to grow hemp from the DEA. Currently,[when?] North Dakota representatives are pursuing legal measures to force DEA approval.[80] Oregon has licensed industrial hemp as of August 2009.[81] Hemp is not legal to grow in the U.S. under Federal law because of its relation to marijuana, and any imported hemp products must meet a zero tolerance level. It is considered a controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act (P.L. 91-513; 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). Some states have made the cultivation of industrial hemp legal, but these states — North Dakota, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Oregon, California, Montana, West Virginia and Vermont — have not yet begun to grow it because of resistance from the federal Drug Enforcement Administration.[82]

    2. Re:wait for it... by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      More likely, these supercapacitors will be outlawed in the US because they "contain drugs".

    3. Re:wait for it... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Colorado [79], Vermont, and North Dakota have passed laws enabling hemp licensure. Both states are waiting...

      So three states equals 2? Is that some kind of bong math?

    4. Re:wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think that growing hemp could really provide more jobs than the ones that are created by outlawing it and anything similar to it? Unless you want to add more than a million people to the list of the unemployed (by releasing convicts and firing cops and prison guards), then you need to think a little more carefully. Right now these undesirables are keeping your wages high. Let them out and the competition might put YOU into the poorhouse.

    5. Re:wait for it... by zlives · · Score: 2

      nope they will require a prescriptioin and be sold by big pharma for pile o profits

    6. Re:wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i'll take my tax dollars spent on this BS back thank you. the for profit incarceration business model is a crime against humanity. i will be glad when its shut down.

      its this high taxation for BS wars, BS military build up on equipment even the military doesn't want, thats putting ME in the poor house.

    7. Re:wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wikipedia math
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemp

      the excerpt was copied from their artice

    8. Re:wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bong grammar, dude.

    9. Re:wait for it... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      The totally hilarious segue to your post is that Marinol, delta-9-THC, one the primary active ingredients in Marijuana, is a DEA Class III drug. Like Vicodan. Subject to modest regulation, but totally legal.

      So the natural stuff is Class I - Heroin type dangerous. The concentrated, pure stuff is Class III - not so bad.

      Gotta love those smart people at the DEA.

      (Yes, I know, real marijuana is more than just THC and Marinol doesn't do as well as the real thing in getting you high. I've prescribed it so patients have an excuse to have marijuana on their urine drug screen but most prefer the wild type. It's also ridiculously expensive.)

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:wait for it... by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      its not even concentrated, marinol is totally synthetic. (patented) and therefore someone can make money on it. Pot grown in my.. i mean someones yard or basement cant bring money in.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    11. Re:wait for it... by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      I would argue the "undesirables" are the ones who are keeping pot illegal, not the ones doing time for smoking a plant.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  6. interesting stuff, but misleading by geoskd · · Score: 5, Informative

    They did in fact create a system that puts out more instantaneous energy per unit weight, but that is not the improvement that super capacitors need. They have improved gravimetric power density. The two measures that need improvement to make super capacitors more useful are gravimetric energy density (how much energy can it store in a given weight), and volumetric energy density. How much energy can it store in a given volume. Without significant improvements in those two areas, super capacitors cannot make significant inroads against batteries.

    It should also be noted that super capacitors already have better power density than chemical batteries by a wide margin, and are more than sufficient to replace I.C. engines and gasoline in that respect.

    --
    I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    1. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      It should also be noted that super capacitors already have better power density than chemical batteries by a wide margin, and are more than sufficient to replace I.C. engines and gasoline in that respect.

      On the other hand they don't provide yet another excuse to incorporate hemp into yet another product or process. I consider hemp to be a sort of "wonder" material, as in, "I wonder what they'll try to put hemp in next just because they can.*" Oh, look! Another item with hemp in it! Surely US hemp policy must be changed now! No doubt it is a useful material, but it is easy to get the impression that hemp advocates are trying just a little too hard. It's also funny how the hemp advocacy often seems to run in parallel with certain other policy advocacy.

      * Hemp trousers. Hemp ice cream, hemp sandwich cookies, hemp milk. Hemp capacitors. Really now.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      They did in fact create a system that puts out more instantaneous energy per unit weight, but that is not the improvement that super capacitors need. They have improved gravimetric power density. The two measures that need improvement to make super capacitors more useful are gravimetric energy density (how much energy can it store in a given weight), and volumetric energy density. How much energy can it store in a given volume. Without significant improvements in those two areas, super capacitors cannot make significant inroads against batteries.

      It should also be noted that super capacitors already have better power density than chemical batteries by a wide margin, and are more than sufficient to replace I.C. engines and gasoline in that respect.

      Yes but do they have the correct price to manufacture to beat internal combustion; and is it scalable; how much will it cost to shove out a 100 million super capacitor powered cars; do we currently have the supply of materials needed to supply the automotive industry; How much will the patent licensing cost? The patents of internal combustion have expired decades ago. Then you have the cost of building a power distribution infrastructure, charging stations, power transportation (improvement to the power grid) massively increase the power generation capacity of country (with internal combustion each vehicle is a self contained generator now the power for all of those vehicles will have to be made somewhere so now you will either have to build more dams, nuclear, or fossil fuel, as renewable does not have the energy output needed without taking up massive amounts of land. (Not everywhere has the enough consistent wind for wind-power or sun for needed energy level of the millions of cars in use so we would have to fill all of the areas that do and people are already complaining about windmills "ruining their view" and organizing NIMBY groups same as they did with nuclear.)) Then you have to convince all of the vehicle manufacturers to use they same power port - think cellphones where we have dozens of chargers because no one wants to use the same one for two devices. gasoline has a relatively low cost per joule easily established infrastructure very few patent and ip concerns and dozens of other reasons it sadly won't go anywhere anytime soon.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    3. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Soy milk, soy meat, soy ice cream.

      Corn on the cob, Maize, high fructose corn syrup, biodiesel.

      Rocks, gravel, sand, glass.

      It's amazing how many things on this planet can have numerous uses. But you keep harping on this one, just like hemp backers talk about their ideas.

    4. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Say, that's really great. Now could you show me the list of Hollywood stars out promoting that we put soy in everything? Corn in everything? Where is the parallel to the whole hemp advocacy culture in broader society for anything else? Feel free to get back to me on that.

      By the way, I wasn't aware that one post constituted "harping." Maybe that post just seemed like it lasted a really long time to you . . . for some reason?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by Phil+Salkie · · Score: 1

      If I read the abstract correctly, they're claiming that an assembled supercapacitor bank using this technology will store 12 watts per kilogram. One of the most energy-dense lithium-ion battery modules currently available is the Moxie+ from Enerdel: http://www.enerdel.com/me350-049-moxie-battery-module/ which stores 100 watts per kilogram. This means that the supercapacitor folks are within an order of magnitude of reaching the same gravimetric energy density as lithium-ion, (now they're roughly on par with lead-acid.) Next they have to do testing to determine lifetime, self-discharge rates, and temperature degradation, and to check safety issues. (What happens when you've got a few kilowatt-hours stored in a supercapacitor module and it gets punctured by a chunk of metal during a collision - lots of lighning and a really hot fire? Commercial lithium-ion modules like the Moxie+ go through puncture testing to show that there's no rapid discharge from being punctured with a nail shot from a nail-gun, or being crushed under rollers, overcharged, discharged, reverse-charged, overheated, or frozen. On the plus side, I suspect that if a supercapacitor catches fire, you can put out the fire with water or CO2, unlike many lithium-ion cells which will happily burn under water once you get them going.) I'll be very interested to see if this winds up going anywhere, it sure sounds like it has... potential.

    6. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by Splab · · Score: 3, Informative

      The thing about hemp is it is bloody robust, you don't need GMO plants, you don't need nasty chemicals to make them grow - Earth, water and some sun and you are good to go.

      Making stuff out of hemp is a very eco friendly thing to do. (And you don't need to use the smoke-able hemp)

    7. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      well they are ruining our engines by wanting to put more and more corn in our gas engines

      many hollywood stars like to push their vegan or vegie beliefs on americans. hell some of them even want to ban cow milk and make everyone drink breast milk!. I mean plain and simple there is nothing wrong with pushing something you believe in. now you can decide if you want to think that any and all hemp proponents are also stoners (I am, wont hide it) but the truth is that hemp is a hugely valuable resource and we are retarded for not using it. I mean we have a totally renewable resource, yet the powers that be want nothing to do with it. I am honestly surprised that the envorionmentalist movement is not attacking the government over hemp.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    8. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The "soy in everything" craze was a 90's thing. "Corn in everything" is a Monsanto thing, and it's already done, so no advocacy needed. Don't know who started the "silicon in everything" craze, but once we figured out how to dope it, there was a resurgence (it's not just stone and glass any more!).

    9. Re:interesting stuff, but misleading by CodeHxr · · Score: 1

      I am honestly surprised that the environmentalist movement is not attacking the government over hemp.

      You and me both.

      I would presume, though, that the fact that a natural plant like this can't be patented, copyrighted, or otherwise maneuvered into having a government-granted monopoly, corporations are fighting tooth and nail to keep it down as long as they can.

  7. always amusing by iggymanz · · Score: 0

    anytime an application needing plant fiber comes along, there's always a group that starts extolling the virtues of hemp for the purpose, because they want industrial hemp to be in common use to hide their short high-THC subspecies of the stuff. Never mind there is ALWAYS other plants with higher yield per acre for any purpose and for any climate, especially in the USA. Just give it up, you silly potheads.

    1. Re:always amusing by WillgasM · · Score: 1

      We should also standardize around a single food crop. Why are we wasting so much time/money/space with variety. The government should mandate that we all have to eat that protein goop from the Matrix movies.

    2. Re:always amusing by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      1. It is not a subspecies. It is the same plant, just different strains. Just like different kinds of tomatoes.

      2. You cannot hide high THC plants in a hemp field. The hemp plants will fertilize and thus ruin the high THC plants. This is why male plants are culled early in illicit grow operations. Growing hemp outdoors on an industrial scale would probably make most illicit outdoor growth impossible for just that reason.

    3. Re:always amusing by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You're right. The correct thing to do is openly advocate for legal recreational Cannabis. There are absolutely no sensible arguments against it, which is why the government won't even discuss the issue.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:always amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone wants proof:

      If you favorite plant was so good, then why doesn't industry use it?

      If it were that good, they'd just lobby for it's use.

      I once asked a Georgia Pacific engineer why they aren't using hemp for their products.

      I got an ear .... no book full.

      I wish some GP'er would write book or something and put these "Hemp is our saviour" myths to rest.

      No, really, if it were cheaper and less resource consuming they'd do it- it's actually MORE water consuming. I'm assuming expense doesn't matter because it costs more too.

      Convincing multiplicities that a water sucking paper plant is in their best interests is a very time consuming and expensive project. If they could say "Here we're suing hemp and everything is A-O-K!" they would. Really. There is no conspiracy with industry. It's just ignorant politicians listening to ignorant people - with Bibles. - that's redundant, I know.

    5. Re:always amusing by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you could hide them in properly designed tanks in a building that was also used for industrial hemp research.

    6. Re:always amusing by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Funny, I have read most of the Bible and I never came across any commandment saying "thou shall not toke it up at 4:20"

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    7. Re:always amusing by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      biology is divided on the "subspecies" vs. varieties issue, see wikipedia for Cannabis

    8. Re:always amusing by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Done. Well, two crops --- corn and soy, to cover sugar, fat, and protein. And we don't even have to wait for government mandates --- private industry has taken the lead in pushing the entire food supply towards a processed corn/soy goop monoculture.

    9. Re:always amusing by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You could hide them in a closet too. Your idea is no better than that. There will not be very many places growing hemp indoors for research, nor would it be practical for much illicit production to be done there.

      You could make meth in a college chemistry lab, does not mean it is very common nor going to supply many users.

      Your coworkers/students would soon notice what you are doing.

    10. Re:always amusing by WillgasM · · Score: 2

      If Linux is truly superior, then why isn't everyone using it? Surely Microsoft would jump all over that bandwagon.

    11. Re:always amusing by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      there are verses saying to be sober though

      if you want a boring life you could obey them

    12. Re:always amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is why the government won't even discuss the issue.

      I think you are somewhat mistaken:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_US_state

    13. Re:always amusing by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you forget we're talking of the reasonings of a third party, not about what would actually work or be logical

    14. Re:always amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pollination doesn't "ruin" a high-THC plant, merely cause it to generate seeds along with flowers. You get less useful pharmaceutical material but it isn't ruined by any means.

    15. Re:always amusing by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Yes, a third party who wants to commit a crime and get away with it.

      Illicit drug production is big business. These folks are not interested in growing 1 plant in the middle of a lab. If they wanted to do that they would just tinfoil a closet.

    16. Re:always amusing by Animats · · Score: 2

      anytime an application needing plant fiber comes along, there's always a group that starts extolling the virtues of hemp for the purpose,

      If you just need biomass for something, there's lots of agricultural waste around. Find a use for straw, or corn husks and cobs, or bagasse (the leftover part of sugar cane). There are other long bast fibers available commercially - jute (used to make burlap), flax (used to make linen), and kenaf (sometimes used to make paper). For even longer fibers, there are plants from the banana family, such as abaca (once called "manila hemp", but it's unrelated) and sisal, which make good rope.

      There's a lot of cellulose out there, waiting for someone to come up with a process for making ethanol from cellulose cheaply. There are processes that work, but they still cost too much.

    17. Re:always amusing by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      It ruins it from a sales perspective.

      Other than high schoolers no one is buying this product with seeds in it. At least they did not when I was in college.

    18. Re:always amusing by femtobyte · · Score: 2

      There are also verses about partying down with plenty of booze --- after all, a certain Nazarene carpenter's son's first biblical miracle was making sure a wedding party wouldn't run out of wine *after the guests were already pretty soused*. The overall message one might take away from the scriptures is "there are times to be sober, and times to not."

    19. Re:always amusing by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure that the potheads would rather go through all sorts of rigamarole to get legal hemp when they can just live in Colorado or Washington and have as much actual pot as they'd like without worrying about it. They're well on their way to making pot legal throughout the country. There's also absolutely no evidence that potheads have any serious difficulty in acquiring pot. That makes the "well, it's industrial hemp really" argument completely pointless.

      And hemp does appear to be useful for a lot of things, including cordage, beer, plastics, building material, and clothing. The market has spoken, and made hemp cultivation a profitable business in places that allow it to exist.

      And for the record, I've never toked the reefer myself.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    20. Re:always amusing by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Illicit drug production is big business.

      I provide care for those who are terminally ill, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    21. Re:always amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT people around the world use Linux to power their servers. The result is superior up time and fewer crashed. MS Windows code works well, it's just never improved upon like Linux is and is more error and bug prone.

    22. Re:always amusing by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are often seeds when you buy from a dispensary here in Colorado. I'm not sure if this is because the plant actually produced those seeds, or if it is because they are simply including them as a free gift with purchase.

      Don't matter much to me, they will still grow when watered.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    23. Re:always amusing by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I have not had any interest in it since college, but you basically could not sell that on the campus I went too. People just would not purchase anything with seeds. It was used at some parties to roll 1/8 blunts, but other than for pranks like that it was considered too low grade to consider useful.

    24. Re:always amusing by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Then I assume your production is legal in your state, but sadly not in your country.

      I hope that this becomes legal medically as well as recreationally.

      Right now most of the production/trafficking is big business for various groups. At least those in your care can be certain you are not spraying only FSM knows what for mites. If you are doing that, stop.

    25. Re:always amusing by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I'm not positive if they do now but they did, at one time, run their mail servers on *NIX. I'm actually willing to hazard a guess that they're using it all over the place over there. However they're not selling it for consumers because they don't see it as best suited for their customers. We can quantify what is best scientifically for things that hemp might be useful for. OSes are subjective mostly with huge weighty lists of pros and cons. I think the term is false equivalency.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    26. Re:always amusing by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the Manila hemp lead to the myth that one could get high smoking banana peels?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    27. Re:always amusing by pspahn · · Score: 1

      it's actually MORE water consuming.

      More than what, a Yucca plant? Than what is needed to product polyester?

      Greeley, Colorado, an agricultural locale that would likely be a good place to grow hemp, receives a little over 14 inches of rain per year, while the water requirements for hemp are shown to be right in that range (12-14 inches/year). It's really not all that different from corn.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    28. Re:always amusing by kimvette · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agreed.

      As a Christian I am constantly appalled by idiots who cherry-pick verses out of context to support their prejudices. I don't think having a good time at a party (or at the wedding you referred to) is equivalent to being a drunkard. People who take verses to support their own biases, ignoring the context and what is actually being said make all Christians look bad.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    29. Re:always amusing by pspahn · · Score: 2

      Well, that's just incorrect these days. Yes, a lot of the pot from the 90's and 00's was considered "not good" if it had seeds. Nowadays, most pot is pretty damn good. If there are a few seeds because the plant hermaphrodized, then not a big deal.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    30. Re:always amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An absurd "crime." We need to drop the politics and bigotry and legalize marijuana. It's an embarrassment that we continue Nixon's drug war to this day.

    31. Re:always amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Colorado State University says that corn requires 22 inches/year for a high yield crop with a range of 20-25 inches/year. You can get a low yield crop of corn on 15-16 inches/year.
      http://www.extension.org/pages/14080/corn-water-requirements

      Oregon State says that hemp requires 20-28 inches/year for optimum yield.
      http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/html/sb/sb681/

      For comparison, Switchgrass can grow everywhere and needs 15-30 inches/year.
      http://www.uky.edu/Ag/Forage/switchgrass2.pdf (PDF)

      The GP stated that there is a better crop for every climate zone. That may or may not be true, I'm not going to look through every zone and every crop, but I will say that hemp is not the end-all-be-all crop it's made out to be. To me, switchgrass looks better for general industrial use (the plan is to grow it on shit land like near highways since it doesn't require much upkeep). In the southeast kudzu since it grows so easily and offers a lot of biomass. But whenever industrial crops are brought up it seems hemp is the only answer. We have lots of different crop possibilities that fit the different climate zones and needs. Hemp is just one of the possibilities and isn't necessarily the best for all purposes. It's just made to sound that way.

    32. Re:always amusing by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      need I remind you the federal government of the united states is one of the biggest dope dealing organizations on planet earth?

      "illicit".....very funny

    33. Re:always amusing by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Notice how in the two cases where Cannabis is legal, it was legalized by referendum and not an act of the legislature. IOW, it was legalized by the people, not by the government. So my statement stands.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    34. Re:always amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's happy days when a male sneaks in at my friends and I get some product at 1/2 price just so he can get rid of it. Gladly spend a few extra seconds popping those suckers out if it means I save some cash.

    35. Re:always amusing by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Colorado is a few years behind California.

      You can't sell weed with seeds for any price. Perfection gets you $2K/lb. Average good indoor/outdoor $1K/lb.

      $100/oz street price.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    36. Re:always amusing by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No need to remind. That does not change its legal status though.

    37. Re:always amusing by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      victimless crimes help keep the prison system large and growing, it's big business. Big business keeps lawmakers in their pockets and contributes to campaigns. They discuss the "War on Drugs" all the time

    38. Re:always amusing by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      If you favorite plant was so good, then why doesn't industry use it?

      ... There is no conspiracy with industry. It's just ignorant politicians listening to ignorant people

      I do so love it when people answer their own questions.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    39. Re:always amusing by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      As a former Catholic and current Humanist minister, I applaud and thank you for not being one of those hypocritical d-bags.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    40. Re:always amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be a big deal for the grower though, if a plant turns hermaphrodite and starts fertilizing, it can ruin an entire batch and force one to resterilize the room.

    41. Re:always amusing by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      tin foil is surprisingly very bad for reflecting the correct light waves.... or so im told.....

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    42. Re:always amusing by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      depends on where you live. here in NY we are spoiled, but I hear from my friends in other states that there is nothing but mexican dirt that comes around.

      in general you are spot on, the only people i know who smoke weed with seeds are old hippies and high schoolers just starting off. I am no fan of high schoolers smoking pot as they dont understand everything going on, high schoolers should not be using drugs. but those are the 2 groups in NY who deal with seeds.

      the same batch of the same strain with seeds will sell for under 100 an OZ while the same exact plant with no seeds could sell for 400 an OZ.

      and for the record, pollination does in fact take away from the plant, The plant will have less THC and CBD if it is pollinated while is it is sensimilla (seedless) it can focus on producing more CDB and THC

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    43. Re:always amusing by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      100 an oz of good weed in cali? shit if it were not for its politics and taxes it would be an awesome place for a stoner. in NY we talk about 3500LB being a good price (5 is not unheard of) and 300 a good OZ price (400 avg for top end)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    44. Re:always amusing by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I'll buy it. Weed snobbery is stupid. Pick out the seeds and smoke the rest. It gets you high and costs less per gram of smokable material.

      The problem with outdoor mexican weed isn't the seeds. It's the handling. Pick it off the plant and dry it and cure it properly, and it's just as good as sensi. Smash it into a brick and store it in bales of hay, and it's pretty disgusting.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    45. Re:always amusing by kimvette · · Score: 1

      > However they're not selling it for consumers because they don't see it as best suited for their customers.

      They're reinventing it, poorly.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    46. Re:always amusing by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      some states allow it. according to the highest law of the land it is not even within the duties of the federal government to decide what things the people can ingest. it is a misconception to think the federal government is superior and ruler over the states, only within certain very limited realms is that true.

    47. Re:always amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Done. Well, two crops --- corn and soy, to cover sugar, fat, and protein. And we don't even have to wait for government mandates --- private industry has taken the lead in pushing the entire food supply towards a processed corn/soy goop monoculture.

      Hey now, that's unfair. We also grow peanuts.

      But that's it.

    48. Re:always amusing by KGIII · · Score: 1

      To be fair, that is all they've ever been doing. The feature set keeps increasing though. I'm not sure if you've noticed but we're moving back to the mainframe and dumb terminal days. I'd say they're doing alright. It's a commodity now.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    49. Re:always amusing by pspahn · · Score: 1

      As someone who grew up in the Bay Area smoking pot, and who now lives in Colorado, I have to say that you really don't understand what the industry has done here... it's quite remarkable.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    50. Re:always amusing by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You can go argue that in front of the Supremes, but for now the executive, judicial and legislative branches disagree with you.

    51. Re:always amusing by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      My kid brother lives in CO. You're still way behind and have a stupidly restrictive set of laws. In CA the feds have shut down most of the 'clubs', after all they were all registered and licensed so where very easy to close. Good thing the California law doesn't require us to register etc.

      Indoor is fading as the economics of outdoor takes over in CA. 5 years ago everybody and their brother were setting up indoor grows. I was shutting mine down as their just wasn't enough money left in it.

      Now you can buy used lights etc for about 20 cents on the dollar.

      BTW seeds from hermaphroditic plants are generally immature as the plant didn't start growing balls until late in the growing cycle.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    52. Re:always amusing by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Like NY politics is any better. At least our weather is good.

      I know a 'farmer' that ships his whole crop to you folks. He won't sell in CA.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    53. Re:always amusing by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse medical with Amendment 64. "Stupidly restrictive" laws? Hardly.

      Go ahead and read it yourself. I am perfectly happy with:

      POSSESSING, GROWING, PROCESSING, OR TRANSPORTING NO MORE 26 THANSIXMARIJUANAPLANTS, WITHTHREEOR FEWER BEINGMATURE,FLOWERING 27 PLANTS, AND POSSESSION OF THE MARIJUANA PRODUCED BY THE PLANTS ON THE 28 PREMISES WHERETHEPLANTS WEREGROWN,PROVIDEDTHATTHEGROWINGTAKES 29 PLACEINANENCLOSED,LOCKEDSPACE, IS NOT CONDUCTEDOPENLYOR PUBLICLY, 30 AND IS NOT MADE AVAILABLE FOR SALE.

      Sounds good to me!

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  8. Charges good, man. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    "Supercapacitors made with the hemp nanosheetsput out more power
    than commercial devices can."

    Wow! How high does the charge get?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Charges good, man. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      Depends on how long the material is pulled and the girth of the feedstock.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Charges good, man. by al.caughey · · Score: 1

      Wow! How high does the charge get?

      The charge can run into the ten's of dollars for hot dogs, doritos and whatever else you want for your monstrous case of munchies

  9. undoing mod by hoboroadie · · Score: 2

    N/T
    Fuck touchscreen, fuck autospell.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    1. Re:undoing mod by Picass0 · · Score: 1

      If you had included "The King" you would've fully channeled The Hound.

  10. And a use for kudzu, too! by jfengel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The wiki link to "bast" refers to a dozen species that produce basts, including flax, wisteria, mulberry, and kudzu.

    Is there a reason to go for hemp in particular, aside from the usual hemp-will-solve-everything? Flax is also produced in industrial quantities. TFA doesn't mention why they chose hemp bast.

    Look, I'm all for legalized weed and hate the propaganda that makes it out as a devil drug, but I'm not any bigger fan of exaggerations about the wonders of hemp. At least on this web site, it would be nice to look at actual data, rather than who can out-propagandize everybody else.

    1. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA doesn't mention why they chose hemp bast.

      I can think of one reason why they chose it...

    2. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you're so balanced.

    3. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hemp has been bred to make ideal fiber in minimal footprint. Just because something is used as propaganda, it does not magically become false.

    4. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Just because something is used as propaganda, it does not magically become false.

      Well that's just, like, your opinon, man.

      True, though. But this is still just about stoners looking for another avenue. A familiar refrain from the crowd that thinks they'd be better off with a tires, a spouse, underwear, and air craft carriers all made out of hemp.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      "Ideal" is an overstatement --- it's a good fiber for some applications, but not magically universally optimal. Consider the pattern of hemp use versus alternate fibers in plenty of (historical and present) societies where marijuana prohibition is/was not a determining factor: while hemp was prized for certain applications (such as nautical ropes and cables, due to good strength and weather/wear resistance), those societies *also* produced a wide variety of alternate fibers (cotton, linen, silk, wool, etc.) for other uses. If hemp was "ideal," then every other fiber source would have been driven out of wide-scale production long ago.

    6. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So the argument is "hemp solves everything" just like he said? Your reason says that it's useful not that it's the best which was the question. What makes hemp better than kudzu (also known as ko-hemp)? He didn't say that hemp wasn't any good only that there are other plants that could be used for industrial purposes as well so why are those automatically out and hemp is in?

      I would think kudzu for industrial applications would be best. Let's face it, that stuff is the closest thing we have to a living super being. After the imminent nuclear winter there will only be two things living: 1. cockroaches, 2. kudzu. We'll have nuclear kudzu eating cockroaches or maybe nuclear cockroach eating kudzu. And to be fair, kudzu is currently used to make things, but when hemp is discussed it's treat as though it's the only plant in the world that will work. We've got all these other plants that we can use, but no, hemp or all is lost.

    7. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by PPH · · Score: 1

      So can I. Well, I knew the reason once. But I forgot.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope this applies to flax as well. Each year in Western Canada, millions of tonnes flax straw is already burned for disposal. Might as well use it for something!

    9. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Yes there are other plants, but they're boring and do not serve as a backdoor totally-innocent-don't-look-at-me-like-that way to get marijuana legal. Every time there's a known stoner advocating for hemp it sets back the movement.

    10. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The wiki link to "bast" refers to a dozen species that produce basts, including flax, wisteria, mulberry, and kudzu. Is there a reason to go for hemp in particular, aside from the usual hemp-will-solve-everything? Flax is also produced in industrial quantities. TFA doesn't mention why they chose hemp bast.

      "hemp-will-solve-everything" and "let's get a foot in the door for legalization" probably account for a large part of the choice... but you can also look at the other plants for more reasons. For example, yes, flax is produced in industrial quantities, but the output is already spoken for. Any additional use for flax must compete with those existing uses. Wisteria is a climbing vine, so production will require the use of some kind of support and thus increased labor costs both in the maintenance of the supports and at harvest time. (Kudzu has the same issue.) Mulberry is a tree, so you likely have a long lead time to harvest, and since bast is found in the bark the ratio of useful material to waste is likely to be low. (Meaning uses will have to be found for that waste to make the process more economical.) Hemp on the other hand is freestanding, and the leaves and seeds (even of the non psychoactive varieties) have commercial value.
       
      In addition we don't know is the proportion of bast available in each plant, or how easy it is to extract and process.
       
      So, there's a lot of factors to consider, not all of which are obvious from just looking at list in a Wikipedia article.
       
      (And it *is* Wikipedia - "a" wiki, one of thousands, not "the" wiki.)

    11. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was afraid of that. Fortunately, the "medical marijuana" back door appears to be much more effective than the "really, you need it for industrial applications for which no other plants are as magical" back door. At least within some states, that one is slowly wedging the door into recreational use.

      That doesn't solve the federal problem, which still presents problems even in legal states, and which will have to be solved before the actual (as opposed to delusional/wishful) advantages of hemp over other products can be realized. That one, I'm afraid, make take a few decades, even after public opinion shifts.

    12. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kudzu is a horrible invasive species, who pretty much chokes off all native greenery, trees included. Spreads easily and drops roots anywhere it can. Not ideal.

      Mulberry is a tree that is again extremely invasive. Cut a tree down and it'll throw out 10 shoots to replace it. Not ideal.

      Wisteria is one of the craziest self replicators there is. Miss a single piece of it and it'll lay roots and retake the landscape given the chance.

      Can't say I know much about flaxs invasive properties.

      At least hemp doesn't doesn't have the typical invasive property of self replicating / cloning your two vines & tree do.

    13. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
      LA Times: Here's why medical pot isn't going away

      http://articles.latimes.com/2013/mar/08/local/la-me-holland-pot-councilman-20130308

      Bill Rosendahl lifts his walker over the threshold and carries it into the grow room before anyone in his entourage — press secretary, pot shop owner, pot consultant and bud tender — can rush over to help.

      Even after 13 hits of radiation and seven rounds of combination chemo, Rosendahl moves steadily, straight as a poplar, past 2-foot-high cannabis plants labeled Hindu Skunk and Humboldt O.G. And, he says, Herbalcure, the Westside pot dispensary we're touring, is responsible for his vigor.

      This is what decades of battles over marijuana use have come to in L.A.: A city councilman taking a journalist around to show where he scores his dope.

      Fuck you, asshole. My mother died of cancer, and it was literally torture. This was before medical pot was available, so the only pain meds she could get left her incapacitated. It was either suffer agony without the meds, or take them and not be able to function. Either way, she was reduced to a pathetic state of uselessness before she was gone. If I knew back then about how pot can ease cancer pain I would have risked jail to get some to make her final days less horrible.

      You are a soulless worm without a shred of human compassion. You are pig ignorant and proud of the fact. Your arrogance matches you stupidity.

      You mock those who suffer. Given how many good people die in needless pain, it is obscene that a moral degenerate like you so easily denigrates their tribulations. I wish you and your family nothing but ill.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    14. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      And YOU are ranting based on words that didn't address prescribed drugs. Which makes you drama queen with no reading comprehension, and someone having a shrill hissy fit over which I imagine your late mother would be embarassed, since observations about the hemp-obsessed subculture have absolutely nothing to do with the nature of her demise. I do like your fantastically ironic bitching about arrogance, though. Fine work.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    15. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wiki link to "bast" refers to a dozen species...

      And it *is* Wikipedia - "a" wiki, one of thousands, not "the" wiki.

      Definition of wiki: A website that allows visitors to make changes, contributions, or corrections. [merriam-webster]

      It is proper usage of the word when referring to Wikipedia as a wiki. If jfengel had capitalized the first letter of wiki, that would imply it being used incorrectly as a title. His usage was okay, because he is describing the content of the link.

    16. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, yes, flax is produced in industrial quantities, but the output is already spoken for. Any additional use for flax must compete with those existing uses.

      Thats why stoners should be careful what they wish for. If hemp becomes major industrial raw material for all those useful purposes, then it will get in short supply for recreational purposes. Besides, growers will select sorts for maximum fiber output and lowest THC content (for safe and high productivity workplace).

      Wisteria is a climbing vine, so production will require the use of some kind of support and thus increased labor costs both in the maintenance of the supports and at harvest time. (Kudzu has the same issue.) Mulberry is a tree, so you likely have a long lead time to harvest, and since bast is found in the bark the ratio of useful material to waste is likely to be low. (Meaning uses will have to be found for that waste to make the process more economical.)

      How about Miscanthus, or some fast growing sorts of bamboo?

    17. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. For clothing, especially near to skin, cotton is preferable over linen, which is preferable over hemp.

    18. Re:And a use for kudzu, too! by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Yes there are other plants, but they're boring and do not serve as a backdoor totally-innocent-don't-look-at-me-like-that way to get marijuana legal.

      Or Canada has an industrial hemp industry and this work is being done by "researchers at the University of Alberta [Canada]"

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  11. From Hops too!? by Chiminea · · Score: 1

    OMG not the hops too! Think of the children!

  12. Knock Knock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worse case Ontario, we just get drunk as fuck, and sell some super catastrophers at the mall for 12 bucks a gram. This isn't rocket appliance here, boys.

  13. Ugh, potheads by Zadaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For all I know this is valid scientific research. But I can't even be bothered to find out because potheads have stigmatized hemp. "Dude, do you know hemp is 85% more efficient biomass than bacon?" "You know that hemp fibers can be turned into inferior yet expensive paper, right?" "Hemp-o-lene, it's either hemp biofuel or something you jump on." Which all are quite obviously thin excuses to grow more "medicinal"* hemp.

    And hemp is a pretty great material, but every time I see an article that talks about a new industrial use I can't help thinking it comes from the same people who giggle when they hear "420" and snerk when they mention how they're into 'hydroponics'.

    Seriously folks, if you want me to take you (hemp or pot smokers) seriously you need to clean up your game. Don't smoke a bowl on April 20th, instead bring to my attention how we really don't know the medical properties of cannabis because of government overregulation (or whatever, anything that has real promise to someone who has no interest in smoking pot.)

    *Medicine is sold at drug stores, not in shadowy places with a bouncer at the door and punny names like "Grass Roots Clinic" or "Foggy Daze Dispensary".

    1. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At present, this comment is directly above Oscar Wilde's quote "He hadn't a single redeeming vice."

      I've seldom seen a more appropriate juxtaposition

    2. Re:Ugh, potheads by WillgasM · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hemp's illegal because weed's illegal. But why's weed illegal; because someone long ago wanted to make hemp illegal. They had controlling share of an opposing market and wanted to eliminate the competition. Here we are decades later wishing to make hemp legal again, but we can't because apparently people still believe jazz musicians are trying to corrupt our white women. Forget the hempen trojan horse; I don't want pot legalized on a technicality. By default, pot should be legal unless someone can give me a valid reason to ban it. The reason it's illegal today is the same root reason it was banned in the first place: there's a powerful industry that makes money from pot being illegal. The paper/textile industries agenda has been replaced (and dwarfed) by our private prison system. "because we'll lose money" is not a good reason to impose regulation. I shouldn't have to defend pot because I've yet to see a valid attack.

    3. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what you're saying is, all other people's actions need to be justified to you, or they're stupid and undeserving of the allowance to do the action? I understood that 'freedom' generally meant that others must justify the restriction of action..

      In other words, the potheads don't need to justify being a pothead to you, 'you' (larger society) need to continuously justify the dis-allowance of being a pothead.

    4. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have brought it to your attention. Countless times. Over many millennia. What is left other than to use it in a joking manner? We aren't stupid, you're stubborn.
      Wake the fuck up already. You're asking young children to don the weight of the adult. Stop that idiotic notion. They'll grow up when ready to do so.
      Sativa is irrefutably useful to everyone that uses it, unless you're in combat, or piloting something big, etc.
      Smile, for there are people with hearts light enough to joke about themselves and their foggy daze.

    5. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude you should prolly relax... smoke a bowl or somethin.

    6. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an ass hat. Also, "snerk" is not a word.

    7. Re:Ugh, potheads by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      What's your opinion on people who simply would like to just get high sometimes?

      I can't drink(medical reasons), I'd be happy to have legal chemical funtime regardless of that fact, sometimes. Pay taxes on it and so forth. I just don't want to die over it, but overall lacking the option isn't liberating, it's limiting - especially if you know how fun it is to get drunk off your ass and the almanac includes three national drinking holidays. If smoking purely for fun was legal, it would make the society more fair - for me. For everyone.

      It would also make growing for industrial use a lot simpler, but that's a side issue. Combining data about health effects resulting from it would be a lot simpler and people could make the choices themselves about what to get their kicks on.

      But I guess the main gist of it is that I despise people who just want to get high but push the medical aspects, hemp soap and so forth - while they should just be working towards the right to get high since that is really the limiting factor for why the whole issue is sensitive - as an alternative to the right to get drunk. It doesn't matter if you're the President of the United States or the Pope - if you drink then you get drunk, it's extremely equalizing in social status as past time. I just want the same thing.

      True, I _could_ drink booze, technically, but that would end up with me dead after extremely expensive hospital care from the state(we have national healthcare where I live). Still, it would be legal for me to do it, wouldn't even count as a suicide for insurance and it might take a year or perhaps ten years, but would statistically involve multiple trips to the hospital as organs start to fail. So I applaud Colorado and Washington. I don't need people to take medicinal use seriously - or the fact that you can get fibers from hemp seriously and frankly the taste in foodproducts is nothing to write home about. I just would benefit from the right to get high, purely for the sake of getting high.

      Nobody really seems to have a good reason to give for why getting high in principle is such a crime.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Funny, from all the reams and reams of hemp paper I've seen, it has always been substantially higher quality than tree paper and less expensive. That is fairly common. Perhaps the hemp paper you've seen was made by amateurs?

      Also, you only do yourself a disservice by ad hominem attacking an arbitrary group of people over their own personal choice. Because of your childish attitude, I am convinced there is no way you can be taken seriously. Please let us know when your brain has matured past the 1950's and we might take you seriously then.

    9. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stoner and conspiracy theorist? You've got something there!

    10. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hemp is legal over here in the Netherlands (weed isn't, you just get away with it because prisons are full and police is lazy). There's a real demand for it - e.g. BMW uses hemp fiber for soundproofing - yet it turns out that hemp isn't profitable. It's not a particularly good fiber, and there is a large supply of old recycled clothes to compete with. They're going to shift production to Romania. Low wages are important to low-value products, but that too is bound to be temporary. Their wages already tripled in the last decade.

    11. Re:Ugh, potheads by Hatta · · Score: 1

      because someone long ago wanted to make hemp illegal. They had controlling share of an opposing market and wanted to eliminate the competition

      The "someone" here is William Randolf Hearst, who was heavily invested in both newspapers and forestry.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Ugh, potheads by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I've testified before my state Senate on the benefits of industrial hemp to me as a farmer (biomass, cash crop, soil recovery). I don't use any intoxicating drugs myself, and at our Senate hearing there was only one pothead (the rest being scientists and farmers).

      A similar effort in Kentucky passed its Senate unanimously. I'm not sure what you're reading, but it's probably not legislative records, which is what really counts.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    13. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shit, you sound just like my college roomate. it was annoying then, too.

    14. Re:Ugh, potheads by shoemilk · · Score: 1

      Dear Alanis,
      This is irony. Zadaz is replying to a story about scientific research done with hemp, which he won't read because of his prejudices. He then sums up with if people want him to changes his prejudices, they should produce some scientific research done with hemp.

    15. Re:Ugh, potheads by addie · · Score: 1

      A lot of what you say is completely valid. However this: "Medicine is sold at drug stores" is a huge assumption. If you define medicine as something that's accepted by government authorities as a substance with medicinal value, then fine. But if you define medicine as a substance that objectively helps to cure or treat the symptoms of a medical condition, then I don't agree. In that case, medicine also grows in the forest, and is defined differently depending on jurisdiction, culture, and a host of other factors.

      I say this not as a burnout hippie, but rather as someone who was raised by a physician and has faith in western medicine (and a fair amount of scorn for homeopathy and the like). However one other thing my father taught me was to have an open mind, and not to speak in absolutes.

    16. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    17. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      potheads have stigmatized hemp

      Um.

      What?

      Do you want to take a minute and reconsider this position?

    18. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prohibition is so cool

    19. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we can take away the following from your post:
      - "potheads" have stigmatized hemp, rather than hysterical propaganda
      - enjoying recreational drugs is awful behaviour
      - it's bad because it's illegal
      - it's illegal because it's illegal

    20. Re:Ugh, potheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't smoke a bowl on April 20th, instead bring to my attention how we really don't know the medical properties of cannabis because of government overregulation (or whatever, anything that has real promise to someone who has no interest in smoking pot.)"

      Okay, we'll start with this

      "*Medicine is sold at drug stores, not in shadowy places with a bouncer at the door and punny names like "Grass Roots Clinic" or "Foggy Daze Dispensary"."

      Do you have a doctor's degree/license? If not shut the fuck up. In fact, there are dispensaries staffed with nothing but doctors. It's medicine. You can still get fucking cocaine proscribed. I don't hear you going 'fucking cokeheads' asshole.

      And it's idiots like you with your 'fucking potheads' attitude that cause me to have to suffer with a busted skeleton, damaged endocanabinoid system (Do you know what it's like to not know that you're starving and tired? IT SUCKS. FUCK YOU AND YOUR STIGMA) and severe neural damage on a daily basis.

      Bet you're a fucking Republican, too, with the already outright unwillingness to learn, instead opening your mouth and deriding that which you clearly have no fucking right or education to discus.

    21. Re:Ugh, potheads by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      You're kind of a judgmental asshole.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  14. Leave the hops alone! by genericmk · · Score: 1

    They're in short enough supply as it is and beer is far more important than nanosheets!

  15. The 1% wants to keep you down, man! by tekrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So since William Randolph Hearst demonized Hemp and forever tied to to Pot, it's been illegal to grow in the USA. You do realize that in most of the free world, you can walk into a grocery store and still buy products made from Coca leaf?

    And yet in the "land of the free" almost everything is banned. Except guns. And you need those in case the government "takes away your rights". I hope you see the tremendous irony there.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  16. No. by PPH · · Score: 1

    I need my guns in case some stoners try to steal my hemp crop.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  17. Coconuts for cryocoolers by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a story from ITER (giant tokamak being built in the south of France), where they used low-tech coconut shells to solve a really high-tech problem. Sometimes Nature provides us with solutions that work better than anything man-made.

    They need to build cryocoolers to remove helium and contaminants from the reactor, and the best material they've tested so far, came from burnt shells of coconuts imported from Indonesia. So the EU has been busy stockpiling enough coconuts to last the lifetime of ITER...

    http://www.iter.org/newsline/116/1681

  18. This has nothing to do with legalization. by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    You could very easily engineer the THC out of the plant. I really wish one of the biotech companies would just do that... so that the next time we get one of these besides the point arguments we can just use that instead.

    Understand, I want the drug legal. Its silly that pot is illegal. I see it the same as booze or tobacco. And I even think they're too heavily regulated. The taxes of Tobacco are too high and the regulations on Alchohol are too stiff. All of it needs to be relaxed to respect consent.

    As to pot, I merely find it annoying that people keep telling me how amazing hemp fiber is when really it can't be that amazing. It can't be the only plant with those properties. And its beyond obvious why people keep bringing the damn plant up... its offensive. Every time I hear that it is an insult because the people making the argument are lying by omission.

    Again... I have no problem with pot being legal. Legalize it. But talking about hemp oil, or hemp fiber, or nano whatever with hemp isn't going to legalize the drug. Its not relevant and it actually offends the few of us with working brains.

    Just be honest about it. You don't need to trick people. And even if you did, this trick isn't going to work. If you insist on tricking us... come up with a better trick.

    I'll finally say that I do not doubt that the scientists found these properties in hemp. I would suggest that there are likely many plants that can yield the same result. And even if there weren't which is extremely unlikely... the path of least resistance would be to simply engineer the THC out of the plant.

    At this point, I'd just like the biotech companies to do that only because I find these dumb arguments by the legalization lobby to be tedious.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  19. Soooo... by Cyrjax · · Score: 1

    If I overclock my CPU will it let off a nice aroma?

  20. Meet The New Boss by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

    So, corporations controlling politicians and the media to further their own interests?

    Same shit, different century :-(

    --
    It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  21. Re:Marijuana? Horseshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selective breeding ..... how about not enough research into the following statement?

    ``Only through selective breeding did they reduce the THC concentrations low enough that the plants couldn't be practically used for psychoactive contents.``

    You don`t seem to understand that low THC Hemp existed in nature 1000`s of years ago and was in use for purposes other than getting stoned.
    Low THC Hemp is an easy to care for crop that provides high protien seeds, and the bast can be made into a variety of very tough materials relatively easily as well.

      If anything cultivation of high THC hemp was brought about by selective breeding.

    I don`t mind the ``Pot is bad for you` mindset -- I just can`t stand the stupidity of not researching something for at least a few minutes.

  22. Too late... graphene is cheap as balls now by BillX · · Score: 1

    Hi, anyone want to talk about something OTHER than the 'hemp' thing?

    The science itself is pretty cool, if maybe a bit late. Like previous work with graphene, it works by puffing up ("exfoliating") laminar carbon stock so that it has an insane surface area - like activated carbon, but much moreso. This surface area is what allows for such high capacity in electric double layer ("super") capacitors.

    "But graphene is still quite expensive to make", says the article. There's the rub - while this research is pitched as a way to avoid the expense of graphene, it was recently discovered you can make graphene in your kitchen.

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  23. Magic smoke by QQBoss · · Score: 1

    Almost two hundred comments, and not one person has commented (that I saw) about how this might encourage engineers and users to start letting out the magic smoke on purpose.

    Or maybe more like this magic smoke is REALLY magic.

    Putting the magic in magic smoke.

    etc...

    * yes, I am quite aware that you are more likely to get cancer from putting your nose close to that super-cap when it blows than getting high, but the comment potential is still 'high'. *rimshot*

  24. That's Illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hemp and marijuana are illegal in this country and as such they cannot be used in medical products, lest the company lose all goverment funding for doing so. Once again someone needs to wake up and smell the hemp, this plant could save this country 25 billion per year on finding and eradicating operations, 10-20 billion in prosecuting and housing, and god only knows the tax revenues (california gets 1.2 billion in sales tax) annually. Wake up and do something to create jobs and revenue for a failing economy.