R or D doesn't matter if they agree to allow this type of bullshit they are assholes.
Seriously how much are we spending on the witch hunt for terrorists?
Can they show results of thwarted attacks to merit such spending? If not the assholes should be removed from office.
On a side note I'd be interested to find out if there are any ties between these people and those that have the contracts to provide hardware for this project.
The Constitution does give the people the right to remove power from the gov, of course history tells when those that have that power will not give it up freely.
I'd like to know how they charge that many lipo's wirelessly in 2 minutes. My fucking 2s lipos, nowhere near what this thing would require, take 20 minutes for a 1000 mAh pack.
What we've learned from our history is the stronger power typically enslaves the weaker, why would you think non-terrestrial intelligence wouldn't enslave us?
535 members in Congress, replaced with chimps, I should expect with that many chimps we'd get Shakespeare or the very least laws and solutions to social problems that make sense and are sustainable.
I would agree with this however, "when you can sit down in the wild and have a conversation in sign language" they shouldn't be a lab animal.
We are talking a trained animal, does your dog still wish to run wild with other dogs? Does your cat wish to hunt in the wild? We aren't talking about something natural, while chimps do have the intelligence to learn sign language we aren't talking about something that is passed down from mother to offspring, it's something taught in a lab.
I do see your point and it is valid. I also agree to some extent.
How often CO2 is blamed on burning of fossil fuels, I often get gobsmacked by how many people forget plants breathe CO2 and release O2 yet no one ever correlates the increase to deforestation of rain forests. Possibly 1 is not enough to merit the change on it's own, but the two combined could account for the increase of CO2, not enough plants and trees in the rain forests to scrub the atmos of CO2 fast enough.
I recall in the 70's and 80's it was ozone, at some point we shifted and now it's CO2.
Your comment was rational and well thought out but missed the obvious so borders on foolish.
Would have been much easier and less obvious for the pilot to drive 30lbs of C4 into position in a vehicle or a backpack or bag vs the stealthy manner of flying it in with something as unwieldy and less than threatening gyro-copter.
To my knowledge gyros also don't have transponders and I'm not sure if they show up on radar.
I do this as well, I also have been known after turning the head to crane around looking into the side mirror to get the full view from the mirror. My main concern are those idiots who see the empty space I'm about to transition to and they swoop in with no signal.
No need to even project an image on the window, just have a red led light up on the side of the vehicle where there's an object detected in the blind spot.
A decent attorney might argue that the client having disabled the camera and run over the child accidentally is no different from a driver doing the same but in a car not equipped with camera which would not have landed the client in trouble.
Not sure if you'd win but it is a valid point, why prosecute one and not the other.
I could agree with you about setting us up to put us in debt but I'd also like to point out there is no one twisting your arm to purchase a new vehicle you can find decent used older vehicles that will cost 1/4th what a new car will.
I fully agree with you about the manual though, I love driving manual. I think it forces the driver to be more aware while driving and less chance of distraction. It's hard to change radio stations or fiddle with GPS when you have to shift gears.
Slashdot Mirror
^ gets it has nothing to do with party affiliation and it's all about $$$$.
I think the my party is better than your party is claptrap.
It's nothing more than divide and conquer.
This
Regardless of party affiliation I see no Congress Critters that aren't in the pockets of some corp or lobby group.
Our political system currently knows nothing about serving anyone but the elite.
You say republican like there's another political group that doesn't want complete subservience to the vested elite.
You act like there's a party that doesn't want that. Please do keep in mind this type of shit knows no party lines.
R or D doesn't matter if they agree to allow this type of bullshit they are assholes.
Seriously how much are we spending on the witch hunt for terrorists?
Can they show results of thwarted attacks to merit such spending? If not the assholes should be removed from office.
On a side note I'd be interested to find out if there are any ties between these people and those that have the contracts to provide hardware for this project.
The Constitution does give the people the right to remove power from the gov, of course history tells when those that have that power will not give it up freely.
I'd like to know how they charge that many lipo's wirelessly in 2 minutes. My fucking 2s lipos, nowhere near what this thing would require, take 20 minutes for a 1000 mAh pack.
What we've learned from our history is the stronger power typically enslaves the weaker, why would you think non-terrestrial intelligence wouldn't enslave us?
535 members in Congress, replaced with chimps, I should expect with that many chimps we'd get Shakespeare or the very least laws and solutions to social problems that make sense and are sustainable.
I would agree with this however, "when you can sit down in the wild and have a conversation in sign language" they shouldn't be a lab animal.
We are talking a trained animal, does your dog still wish to run wild with other dogs? Does your cat wish to hunt in the wild? We aren't talking about something natural, while chimps do have the intelligence to learn sign language we aren't talking about something that is passed down from mother to offspring, it's something taught in a lab.
I do see your point and it is valid. I also agree to some extent.
This is the US legal system what does, wisdom, logic and reasoning have to do with it?
Chimps were doctors and scientists, gorillas were the ones that carried guns.
Since they are now recognized will these freeloading bastards now pay taxes as well?
If you had his money it'd probably be worth it to stick it to the neighbors and do low income housing.
I'm sure there will be massive tax breaks for him.
Keep in mind when the first 3 came out the gov't wasn't paying everyone welfare. This was back when America was free long before it became 'Murika!
I see it more power companies see their ultimate demise and are using "tech" as a means to slow their death.
I think it'll be disease long before it's war or starvation.
How often CO2 is blamed on burning of fossil fuels, I often get gobsmacked by how many people forget plants breathe CO2 and release O2 yet no one ever correlates the increase to deforestation of rain forests. Possibly 1 is not enough to merit the change on it's own, but the two combined could account for the increase of CO2, not enough plants and trees in the rain forests to scrub the atmos of CO2 fast enough.
I recall in the 70's and 80's it was ozone, at some point we shifted and now it's CO2.
Your comment was rational and well thought out but missed the obvious so borders on foolish.
Would have been much easier and less obvious for the pilot to drive 30lbs of C4 into position in a vehicle or a backpack or bag vs the stealthy manner of flying it in with something as unwieldy and less than threatening gyro-copter.
To my knowledge gyros also don't have transponders and I'm not sure if they show up on radar.
I do this as well, I also have been known after turning the head to crane around looking into the side mirror to get the full view from the mirror. My main concern are those idiots who see the empty space I'm about to transition to and they swoop in with no signal.
No need to even project an image on the window, just have a red led light up on the side of the vehicle where there's an object detected in the blind spot.
A decent attorney might argue that the client having disabled the camera and run over the child accidentally is no different from a driver doing the same but in a car not equipped with camera which would not have landed the client in trouble.
Not sure if you'd win but it is a valid point, why prosecute one and not the other.
I could agree with you about setting us up to put us in debt but I'd also like to point out there is no one twisting your arm to purchase a new vehicle you can find decent used older vehicles that will cost 1/4th what a new car will.
I fully agree with you about the manual though, I love driving manual. I think it forces the driver to be more aware while driving and less chance of distraction. It's hard to change radio stations or fiddle with GPS when you have to shift gears.
My insurance company should offer me a discount for driving a manual then as I could suggest it's an "anti-theft" feature.