yeah... but people went to see Avatar based on buzz, even though the movie thoroughly, totally, absolutely, entirely, wholly, fully, quite, altogether, one hundred percent, downright, outright, in all respects, unconditionally, perfectly, really, to the hilt, to the core, utterly, positively, indisputably, indubitably, beer, unquestionably, beyond any doubt, beyond any question, incontrovertibly, incontestable, irrefutable, unassailably; certainly, surely, definitely, positively, conclusively, plainly, obviously, unmistakably, self-evidently, patently, emphatically, categorically, unequivocally sucked.
>> The method will differ, that's all. Goodbye torrents, hello ????? >> (sidenote: Remember rule #1. I purposely have a glaring oversight in the list above. Can you spot it? LOL)
(not that it was actually destroyed), but why destroy the dataset? Just post to slashdot, wait for someone to send you a link to chilling effects or eff, then follow up with chilling effects or eff, then release the dataset.
>> "This article takes the interesting perspective that leaving bugs in software is good — little ones, at least. This quote is particularly insightful: 'How do you know whether a bug is big or little? Think about who's going to hit it, and how mad they'll be when they do. If a user who goes through three levels of menus, opens an advanced configuration window, checks three checkboxes, and hits the 'A' key gets a weird error message for his trouble, that's a little bug. It's buried deep, and when the user hits it, he says 'huh,' clicks a button, and then goes on his merry way. If your program crashes on launch for a common setup, though, that's a big bug. Lots of people will hit it, and they will all be pissed.... The cost of fixing all the bugs in your program and then being sure you fixed them all is way too high compared to the cost of having a few users hit some bugs they won't care about."
Don't worry about other people talking about not deleting your account because the last saved version will persist. First, your data isn't important. Second, all data is also copied to your friends' wall and photos anyway. Third, they will keep all versions of data to eternity unless you try flooding data into the system to make them delete you -- which will only result in them sending the lawyers.
In all, please edit this phrase "going to delete my Facebook account" to past tense and then post a screenshot.
IRL, if you do something wrong and someone catches you red handed, you are right there. They can detain you, they can identify you, they can retaliate. If if you broke in their house, they can shoot you dead. Also, at that time, they are in the same jurisdiction as you.
>> The real question is, does it matter? Ok, so census data is kept secure. What about every other form you've filled out that asks the same questions, or similar questions. Or just plain ol Google datamining?
>> What difference does it make if this data over here is locked up tight when this same data over here is plastered all over the interwebs?
Because a database becomes exponentially more useful when it is linked to other things.
For example, on a recent blog post an American talks about buying products online and how much they paid - they didn't mention anything about paying the state use tax for that purchase. That's public info. Having the same info in that person's state revenue department database is a LOT worse.
Adblock itself have debunked that downloading ads is good for sites (http://adblockplus.org/blog/)
My statement was a little steadfast. Chrome Adblock is nowhere near Firefox, and people have not left in droves for Chrome. Once Adblock is improved, and we get noscript, I see no reason why a well-informed person would choose Firefox.
Slashdot Mirror
Please dont describe obscure brands like Firefox without providing an introduction.
For those of you that haven't heard, please see more at http://en.wikipedia.com/wiki/Firefox
Links, photos, uploads, web.archive.org, please
(Score:6, I would like to read more)
I think it is spelled blag and pronounced /blag/
There's nothing implicitly wrong with local regulation of utilities. There is potential for abuse when the pols can spend OPM.
yeah... but people went to see Avatar based on buzz, even though the movie thoroughly, totally, absolutely, entirely, wholly, fully, quite, altogether, one hundred percent, downright, outright, in all respects, unconditionally, perfectly, really, to the hilt, to the core, utterly, positively, indisputably, indubitably, beer, unquestionably, beyond any doubt, beyond any question, incontrovertibly, incontestable, irrefutable, unassailably; certainly, surely, definitely, positively, conclusively, plainly, obviously, unmistakably, self-evidently, patently, emphatically, categorically, unequivocally sucked.
Is it resident in plaintext in these offsite locations?
>> The method will differ, that's all. Goodbye torrents, hello ?????
>> (sidenote: Remember rule #1. I purposely have a glaring oversight in the list above. Can you spot it? LOL)
Yeah, but I thought it's spelled ??????
here's a bayesian network that solves problems based on predicates related to objects:
http://phor.net/19/
please note -- expect page load times of 20+ sec
(not that it was actually destroyed), but why destroy the dataset? Just post to slashdot, wait for someone to send you a link to chilling effects or eff, then follow up with chilling effects or eff, then release the dataset.
I guess its better than factory factory factories:
http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?joel.3.219431
>> "This article takes the interesting perspective that leaving bugs in software is good — little ones, at least. This quote is particularly insightful: 'How do you know whether a bug is big or little? Think about who's going to hit it, and how mad they'll be when they do. If a user who goes through three levels of menus, opens an advanced configuration window, checks three checkboxes, and hits the 'A' key gets a weird error message for his trouble, that's a little bug. It's buried deep, and when the user hits it, he says 'huh,' clicks a button, and then goes on his merry way. If your program crashes on launch for a common setup, though, that's a big bug. Lots of people will hit it, and they will all be pissed. ... The cost of fixing all the bugs in your program and then being sure you fixed them all is way too high compared to the cost of having a few users hit some bugs they won't care about."
So... in other words, meh
Another issue is that revenue forecasts tend to be optimistic.
Maybe offtopic, but how does DNCSEC affect DNS level censorship?
A single false, signed certificate from anywhere provides undeniable cause to revoke a CA from all browsers.
Tell that to the lawyers in the blizzard case.
Don't worry about other people talking about not deleting your account because the last saved version will persist. First, your data isn't important. Second, all data is also copied to your friends' wall and photos anyway. Third, they will keep all versions of data to eternity unless you try flooding data into the system to make them delete you -- which will only result in them sending the lawyers.
In all, please edit this phrase "going to delete my Facebook account" to past tense and then post a screenshot.
There is a difference.
IRL, if you do something wrong and someone catches you red handed, you are right there. They can detain you, they can identify you, they can retaliate. If if you broke in their house, they can shoot you dead. Also, at that time, they are in the same jurisdiction as you.
The internet is different. PROTIP: Always keep a list of countries that don’t extradite to the US. You never know when it will come in handy.
>> The real question is, does it matter? Ok, so census data is kept secure. What about every other form you've filled out that asks the same questions, or similar questions. Or just plain ol Google datamining?
>> What difference does it make if this data over here is locked up tight when this same data over here is plastered all over the interwebs?
Because a database becomes exponentially more useful when it is linked to other things.
For example, on a recent blog post an American talks about buying products online and how much they paid - they didn't mention anything about paying the state use tax for that purchase. That's public info. Having the same info in that person's state revenue department database is a LOT worse.
This is a good thing, if done properly.
It's also part of why people generally smile when they use their phones and frown when they use their computers.
Adblock itself have debunked that downloading ads is good for sites (http://adblockplus.org/blog/)
My statement was a little steadfast. Chrome Adblock is nowhere near Firefox, and people have not left in droves for Chrome. Once Adblock is improved, and we get noscript, I see no reason why a well-informed person would choose Firefox.
The civil disobedience/public interest whistleblower point, destroys your first two arguments.
Please be more specific with your third so that I can take it in as a whole.
Is this it http://www.uk-space.com/ ??
Please watch this video for a demonstration of the *40 times more performance* available with SSD:
http://www.youtube.com/results?uploaded=m&search_query=ssd+hdd&search_type=videos&suggested_categories=28&uni=3
>> Would any people as a whole choose to convert to a communistic system. I'm thinking no.
Headlines: Obama's Health Care Reform Bill Passed