Slashdot Mirror


Groklaw Will Be Archived At Library of Congress

inode_buddha writes "Groklaw has just received an invitation to be archived in the Library of Congress. In true FOSS style, PJ has decided to ask all the contributors and commenters if they wish to be included, since commenters own the copyrights on their comments. So far, the answer seems to be 'yes,' even for Anonymous Cowards. It's a great honor for Groklaw, but one wonders how many AC's there are, and whether Congress or future researchers would think that they are all one person."

81 comments

  1. Congrats by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I give my congratulations to PJ. She has done a remarkable service and has proven the Internet's power for citizen advocacy, education and activism. Her success can be measured by just how much her enemies tried to, and in some cases still try to discredit her.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The United States Library of Congress has selected your Web site for inclusion in its historic collections of Internet materials related to Legal Blawgs.

      Best typo ever.

    2. Re:Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The United States Library of Congress has selected your Web site for inclusion in its historic collections of Internet materials related to Legal Blawgs.

      Best typo ever.

      You might want to reconsider your assertion about the alleged typo. It seems the spelling has been used previously. http://www.blawg.com

    3. Re:Congrats by msclrhd · · Score: 4, Informative

      It comes from the pronunciation of "blogs" in some accents:
          * /blA.gz/ -- the 'o' is pronounced the same as in "b(o)ther", where "f(a)ther" and "b(o)ther" are pronounced differently (e.g. British Accents) [to pronounce this, pronounce it as the "ah" in "f(a)ther", but round the lips like in "b(oo)k" and keep it a short sound]
          * /blA:gz/ -- the 'o' is pronounced the same as "f(a)ther", where "f(a)ther" and "b(o)ther" are pronounced the same (e.g. some American Accents)
          * /blOgz/ -- the 'o' is pronounced the same as "m(ore)" (e.g. some American Accents)

      The /blOgz/ pronunciation gets transliterated as "blawgs". Therefore, it is a transliteration of that accent and not a typo. It was probably chosen for this and (as people on Groklaw have noted) that it contains the word "law" in it.

      c.f. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonological_history_of_English_low_back_vowels

      NOTE: I am using Kirshenbaum (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirshenbaum) as /. does not accept Unicode IPA characters.

    4. Re:Congrats by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      It's in the original. The Library of Congress, like all government institutions, is 20 years behind the times.

      I prefer Library Of Congress Will Be Archived At Groklaw.

    5. Re:Congrats by RMS+Eats+Toejam · · Score: 0

      Where else but Slashdot is shameless ass-kissing considered insightful? Her enemies, a word that helps you feel like you are part of some epic battle of good vs evil, don't discredit her because she spends her free time regurgitating legal documents. Rather it's because she's a well known Linux zealot. While you are well entitled to worship who you please, it's pretty twisted to turn dislike for those such as yourself into proof of victory. Just know that it doesn't go unnoticed.

      --
      Turning to a Linux advocate for thoughts on Microsoft is like asking Hitler how he felt about the Jews.
    6. Re:Congrats by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And how much SCO stock did you buy? Bitterness becomes you, just like that boot print in your ass.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:Congrats by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Hey!! Is that you, Rob Enderle?? We need PJ to start a GROKGOD and then maybe we can get rid of another but bigger con....

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    8. Re:Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was a little too mildly interesting for its being wildly off-topic. (Apparently, mods disagreed.)

    9. Re:Congrats by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      I too offer my congratulations to PJ and the hard working Groklaw community. When I started reading her blog in the Spring of 2003 there was a lot of confusion as to the future of Linux and even the GPL. How a company that owed it's existence to Linux and the GPL (I'm referring to Caldera which became The SCO Group) could turn on the whole community as it did was a dark time in business.

      Of course nearly every claim was proven false (with the possible exception of errno.h and some drivers submitted by SGI, IIRC) due to the unrelenting research by PJ and so many others in the Groklaw community. She and they proved that an open community can be more powerful than elite lawyers and companies funded by deep pockets.

      This work truly belongs in the LOC and should be studied and emulated.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    10. Re:Congrats by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      I think it is spelled blag and pronounced /blag/

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  2. Give generated IDs to anonymous cowards by unity100 · · Score: 1

    ie through a script :

    Anonymous Coward 138513

    Anonymous Coward 138514

    Anonymous Coward 138514
    ................

    Anonymous Coward whatever

    1. Re:Give generated IDs to anonymous cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or just prevent people contributing anonymously unless they give unconditional licence to reuse the prose, and affirm that they both own the content or have been granted permission to use it, or have fair use to it, under current copyright law.

      [This comment (c) 2010, Anonymous Coward #1123581321]

    2. Re:Give generated IDs to anonymous cowards by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Or just prevent people contributing anonymously unless they give unconditional licence to reuse the prose, and affirm that they both own the content or have been granted permission to use it, or have fair use to it, under current copyright law.

      Or just apply creative commons, with an attribution state.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    3. Re:Give generated IDs to anonymous cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And what about all the people she "anonymised" when she deleted their accounts, but not their comments?

      (most notably John Gabriel, but others as well.)

    4. Re:Give generated IDs to anonymous cowards by SmoothTom · · Score: 1

      An additional problem with a good number of the earlier "Anonymous" posts is that they were originally owned by and identified to their copyright owners with the use of the Groklaw User IDs. In 2004, PJ went through a purge of a number of folks she disagreed with, deleted their users accounts, and all of their comments were instantly anonymized with no chance of recovery.

      PJ's essentially removing the copyright identification from those thousands of posts caused a bit of upset from those who felt that by removing the only copyright information from the posts by replacing the name in the headers with "Anonymous" overstepped ethical bounds.

      My standing with those who felt she had overstepped by doing that is the reason my original "Tomas" ID ( http://www.groklaw.net/users.php?mode=profile&uid=2502 )was banned from Groklaw. I've done very little posting under my replacement ID.

      --Tomas

  3. What shallI do? by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Funny

    I contributed several comments to Groklaw but those comments I lifted from a number of Slashdotters. How do I handle that? I just want to do the right thing.

    1. Re:What shallI do? by Dynedain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Explain that in your response to Groklaw and let them figure it out.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:What shallI do? by RichardJenkins · · Score: 4, Funny

      The right thing is obviously to sue the true rights holders in a protracted and monumentally expensive legal battle dragging your name through the mud and ultimately making a complete ass of yourself, after artificially inflating your stock price for a little while.

    3. Re:What shallI do? by RockDoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

      The right thing is obviously to sue the true rights holders in a protracted and monumentally expensive legal battle dragging your name through the mud and ultimately making a complete ass of yourself, after artificially inflating your stock price for a little while.

      There is a man in Utah (I think) who is interested in your plan and wishes to invest his unemployment benefits in suing you for infringement of his patents. Call Darl@mcdonalds.ut.us

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    4. Re:What shallI do? by bain_online · · Score: 1

      And start second version of Groklaw to cover related news and allow AC comments and ... well this can go on for ever!!!!

      --
      BAIN http://www.devslashzero.com
    5. Re:What shallI do? by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      If they use my intellectual property I will sue them for one billion dollars. No, five.

  4. I AM ANONYMOUS COWARD! by VojakSvejk · · Score: 1

    I am anonymous coward!

    Aw, hell

    And by the way, omniscient slashdot filter, I WAS YELLING

    1. Re:I AM ANONYMOUS COWARD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm anonymous coward!

    2. Re:I AM ANONYMOUS COWARD! by bcmm · · Score: 1

      No, I am!

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    3. Re:I AM ANONYMOUS COWARD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm anonymous coward, and so is my wife!

    4. Re:I AM ANONYMOUS COWARD! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I AM SPARTACUS^wAnonymous Coward!

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    5. Re:I AM ANONYMOUS COWARD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Article summary:

      It's a great honor for Groklaw, but one wonders how many AC's there are, and whether Congress or future researchers would think that they are all one person."

      He's not?! Thank God for that!

      I was damn sure I hadn't made all those inane comments and trolls, but I figured I'd been very, *very* drunk at the time.

  5. Frist Comment ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great ... now we can all be Cowardly counted as +1

  6. One LoC + x by Reason58 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is going to throw off my entire measurement system. What's the size of a Groklaw so I can add that in?

    1. Re:One LoC + x by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Funny

      About 2 and a half Slashdots.

    2. Re:One LoC + x by tbogart · · Score: 1

      About 2 and a half Slashdots.

      Are we speaking quantity or quality here?

    3. Re:One LoC + x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we speaking quantity or quality here?

      The proverbial dick size.

  7. People are often dumb, but... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a great honor for Groklaw, but one wonders how many AC's there are, and whether Congress or future researchers would think that they are all one person.

    I rather doubt many future researchers would think that "Anonymous Coward" is one person, though I can't speak for members of Congress. I can certainly imagine Ted Stevens talking about the tremendously prolific output of A. Coward flowing through a series of tubes....

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:People are often dumb, but... by Meshach · · Score: 1

      I agree it is fairly self-explanatory that "Anonymous Coward" is not one person. Anyone conducting research with the Groklaw archives that assumes it is a single entity deserves whatever convoluted results they obtain.

      --
      "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
      Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:People are often dumb, but... by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, it is the Library of CONGRESS.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:People are often dumb, but... by bughunter · · Score: 1

      An AC is not just a person, it's "something the size of a baby hippo, the color of a week-old boiled potato, that lives by itself, in the dark, in a double-wide on the outskirts of Tacoma. It's covered with eyes and it sweats constantly. The sweat runs into those eyes and makes them sting. It has no mouth... abraded genitals, and can only express its mute extremes of murderous rage and infantile desire by banging out trolls and flamebait on its wireless keyboard."

      (With apologies to William Gibson and Cory Doctorow)

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    4. Re:People are often dumb, but... by ljw1004 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's amazing just how many books this "Ibid" chap has written.

      And "et al" seems a really common surname among authors of scientific papers.

    5. Re:People are often dumb, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An AC is not just a person, it's "something the size of a baby hippo, the color of a week-old boiled potato, that lives by itself, in the dark, in a double-wide on the outskirts of Tacoma. It's covered with eyes and it sweats constantly. The sweat runs into those eyes and makes them sting. It has no mouth... abraded genitals, and can only express its mute extremes of murderous rage and infantile desire by banging out trolls and flamebait on its wireless keyboard."

      Actually, I am, by profession, a mirror.

  8. Mr. Anonymous Coward by 49152 · · Score: 1

    "It's a great honor for Groklaw, but one wonders how many AC's there are, and whether Congress or future researchers would think that they are all one person."

    That would be one seriously disturbed person ;-) The future psychologists will have a field day analyzing this guy!

    1. Re:Mr. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I resent that!

      Oh, wait, I guess I don't.

  9. I hereby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... give permission for all my comments to be archived without limitations.

    Yours truly,

    Anonymous Coward

    Now slashdot won't have to worry about that in the unlikely case anybody ever finds its contents useful enough to preserve them for future generations.

    1. Re:I hereby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree with myself here. I think I'm just being a complete ass in doing this. Putting things out there for all the world to see...

      Who does that?

      Pfft!

      Please don't listen to my other personalities. They're all crazy.

  10. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, I've got a split personality!

    Also, I vote for yes.

    1. Re:Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I vote no. Slashdot shall now never enter the LoC!

  11. And the Smithsonian is planning an exhibit of ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... the mummified head of Daryl McBride on a pike.

    You toss in a quarter, and the head screams "I'll swallow your code! I'll swallow your code!," whilst you get to whack at it with a chainsaw and plink it with the shotgun out of the Smithsonian Housewares exhibit, and taunt it with Bruce Campbell grimaces.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  12. Slashdot? by adenied · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Perhaps Slashdot should be included. But as a counter example.

    I keed I keed. You guys are all great! Except for the ones who aren't.

    Actually I got suckered into reading user comments on CNN.com the other day. Makes Slashdot look like powerful scholars who by all rights should be in charge of the playground. Not mopping up the melting snow with their ratty jackets.

    Damnit. I really do love you guys!

    1. Re:Slashdot? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I can't figure out if you're at it with the Rum or the Whiskey.

    2. Re:Slashdot? by gangien · · Score: 1

      Actually I got suckered into reading user comments on CNN.com the other day.

      I had this happen too. I feel your pain my /. brother.

    3. Re:Slashdot? by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      Every once in a while I do that so I can again appreciate /. It really does help.

    4. Re:Slashdot? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Slashdot should be included. But as a counter example.

      But then if a slashdot post refers to a Library of Congress as a unit for measuring data, that actual post will change the definition of a LoC so the LoC could never be meaningful on slashdot anymore.

    5. Re:Slashdot? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      "You changed the outcome of the race by observing it!"

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  13. Anonymous Coward Comment Ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you can assume that Anonymous Cowards implicitly disclaim any ownership of their post by disassociating themselves from their identity. Then again, so far as I know, copyright ownership can't be lost implicitly. By the way, this comment is hereby placed in the public domain.

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward Comment Ownership by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By the way, this comment is hereby placed in the public domain.

      And Google will be charge $1.99 for each access to it.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Anonymous Coward Comment Ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can assume that Anonymous Cowards implicitly disclaim any ownership of their post by disassociating themselves from their identity. Then again, so far as I know, copyright ownership can't be lost implicitly.

      This comment is Copyright (C) Demonic Slashdot Posters, Inc. 2010, All rights reserved. You may not reproduce or transmit any part of this work in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without prior written consent of the copyright owner and the publisher.

  14. Size of Groklaw archive by Curate · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anyone know just how big the Groklaw archive is, anyway? Please answer in units of Libraries of Congresses, or LOCs. And how big will it be, in LOCs, after it gets added? And how big is the actual Library of Congress, in LOCs, both before and after the addition? I'd prefer it in metric LOCs (being Canadian), but I can convert from imperial LOCs if necessary. Thanks.

    1. Re:Size of Groklaw archive by Pop69 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Isn't it obvious that the Library of Congress is always equal to one LOC ?

      Your mistake is thinking that one LOC is a constant

    2. Re:Size of Groklaw archive by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, this sounds like a job for DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS!

      *runs and hides*

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
  15. Famous ACs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was only recently discovered that the Federalist Papers were actually written by the Founding Fathers. Until now, those might have been the nation's most famous ACs.

    1. Re:Famous ACs by JoshuaZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's not quite true. Even shortly after the Federalist Papers came out the set of authors was narrowed down quite a bit by intelligent speculation. Hamilton, John Jay and Madison were all named as possible authors (and in fact they were the three authors). After Hamilton died, documents in his possession showed that he was definitely an author and indicated that Madison was also an author. Moreover, there's a fair bit of evidence that when the essays were initially published, many people involved with the publishing and proof-reading knew who the authors were. What is more accurate is that it wasn't until much more modern work by historian Douglass Adair that we had a very good idea which were authored by which of the three. However, even that was well-established by 1970. So the comparison to AC is interesting but not so accurate.

    2. Re:Famous ACs by JoshuaZ · · Score: 2

      Sorry, and one other important detail: After Hamilton's death, Madison publicly acknowledged that he and Hamilton were primary authors. He also confirmed the then also deceased Jay's authorship and gave a complete list of who wrote which (although Hamilton's personal list had some contradictions with Madison's list).

  16. Censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    PJ is notorious for censoring comments that she doesn't like. For instance, any reference to AllParadox will get your comment removed.

    It is PJ's blog and she can do what she likes but it isn't nearly as transparent as she would have us believe. It would be nice if they could restore the censored comments and archive those too.

  17. One giant I Told You So by NZheretic · · Score: 1

    SCO Group copyright claims:
    9th June 2003 What evidence of origin,ownership,copyright + GPL
    And soon SCO Group Vs IBM:
    12th June 2003 The Trillian Project : Proof of SCO's actions

    "Now there is one element of OpenServer that is not coming over, we don't the IP, we just own all the right to distribution, ongoing development for the open server, and that has to tax and other considerations"

    Random Love, CEO Caldera, keynote address,LINUXWORLD 2000 conference, August

  18. Here's teh solution... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ... But who's willing to go for a name change?

    Groklaw has my ok.

  19. No New Groklaw Accounts = Anonymous Cowards by DodgeRules · · Score: 2, Informative

    Reguarding the Anonymous Cowards comment, PJ had disabled new accounts so it is currently impossible for anyone to create one. All new users have no choice BUT to be anonymous. Some also prefer NOT to be anonymous, but their accounts were disabled/deleted because they posted a serious comment that was against popular opinion and labeled a troll. That isn't to say there aren't a lot of trolls there, because there are.

    1. Re:No New Groklaw Accounts = Anonymous Cowards by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Hunh? New account creation is not disabled.

  20. Agreed by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    Kudos to PJ. I think it is quite well deserved.

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  21. As an anonymous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It is my firm belief that all anonymous posts are public domain.

    It is precisely like someone shouting in a square -- and that's why I always choose to go anonymous.

    I want what I say to be judged on its own merits -- praised or rejected, whatever.

    That /. in practice relegated ACs to oblivion looks like totally idiotic to me (though I recognize jerks usually post anonymously)... we need a better system.

    Karma is only desired by those who must collect it with daily zeal; the truly enlightened, by the proper definition of the word, don't want karma.

    (I apologize for the hubris shown).

  22. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many Libraries of Congress fit in there.

  23. But I thought.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but one wonders how many AC's there are, and whether Congress or future researchers would think that they are all one person."

    I thought I was a collective, you know... like the Borg

  24. Anonymous Coward AGAIN??? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    If future researchers decided that "Anonymous Coward" was one person, how could they help but wonder at the popularity of "Apple/Microsoft/Linux Fanboi", whom AC constantly orders to "suck this".

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  25. I get around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is only one Anonymous Coward and I am very busy.

  26. HooRah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started following GrokLaw as a newbie to network admin as it started, kinda mortified as to the idea that the whole Open Source creative system was open to not a technical attack, but a legal attack that kinda obscured the origins of the code being created. Our main server was set up by a kid who had had a project in college to create a web/file/print/dns/etc. server using this new OS called Linux. Which he did for us, and I inherited- worked great. I redid it several times, now run OpenSuse for grins. The learning curve was helped along thru the local LUG.

    I was new to the open source prospects, and putting into place many great products that I found, windows based as well as Linux. This attack seemed to set the whole movement back a bit, but in the meantime I kept watch on GrokLaw for liability purposes.

    PJ does deserve a spot in the National Archives. Brilliant reporting and analysis, curing that problem of tech getting attacked via legal obscurity. It was a real job.

    We tend to forget that technology gets better thru the enthusiast's working in the garages, and sometimes companies will fight for their base as last resort.

    Anonymous Coward

  27. Really? Whining about moderation? by symbolset · · Score: 0, Troll

    Do you really think they're browsing about the Internet up at the Library of Congress looking to archive the unmoderated drivel that is a slashdot, digg, 4chan or fark thread? Really?

    <sigh> some days I wonder how some of you ACs managed to get your screensaver turned off so you can post this crap.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  28. Under which license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should be interesting.

  29. Re:Really? Whining about moderation? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    Well you got modded down as you presumably intended but your post is still going to be archived. I like the fact that short of extreme measures from the CoS and dodgy database design posts on /. stay there forever.

    I didn't like the ability of editors to delete posts from Technocrat yet I posted there. I don't like it on boing boing either.

    A moderation system is a better way to suppress posts.

  30. Be careful PJ... by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    ...the library of Congress has been known to f*ck people.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  31. Re:Really? Whining about moderation? by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Of course. I love that posts are persistent here on slashdot. It's an elegant solution to a lot of problems. I just don't think it's the only answer.

    I like that things are done differently in other places too. Not everybody has to do everything the same way. Part of going to Groklaw is that you accept that PJ's moderation system is arbitrary and capricious. It has made for a good quality website, if not so full of hidden surprises of slashdot's "wild west" method, at least with less unpleasantness.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.