I think RedHat is causing unnecessary contention. I don't understand why a company that is trying so hard to seem valid, would put such a statement out. For someone in their position, such a risk is great. My perspective of them has dropped many notches. As for most of the other comments here, they are just plain US bashing. We are happy here in the US and we are free and have access to more information than we know what to do with. We have access to our represenatives and we can vote. I thought this was to have good Science and Technical discussion, but instead, it has been for the most part, just flamming the US and their supportors.
We did do that. First, we have to keep the Mars surface pristine so that we can study the current Mars life. Then after Centries of researching "Life on Mars" we will go back in time and plant the cyanobacteria on the Marsian surface.:-) The headstart then turns out to be totally bogus, because we find we hampered a new technology to terraform Mars and in the end cannot terraform Mars at all. Yes, we did try to send someone back to stop the planting of cyanobacteria on Mars, but a time conflict prevented that.
Well first, the hydrocarbons will be throughly mixed into the upper atmosphere with a double dose injection. Then the sonic compressions will blast the foul mixture miles wide in trillions of cubic meters of air per centimeter. This will contribue both to global warming and ozone depletion. Though, by the time scientists figure this out, scramjets will be the only mode of transportation.
Slashdot Mirror
I think RedHat is causing unnecessary contention. I don't understand why a company that is trying so hard to seem valid, would put such a statement out. For someone in their position, such a risk is great. My perspective of them has dropped many notches. As for most of the other comments here, they are just plain US bashing. We are happy here in the US and we are free and have access to more information than we know what to do with. We have access to our represenatives and we can vote. I thought this was to have good Science and Technical discussion, but instead, it has been for the most part, just flamming the US and their supportors.
Anyone have an extra pair of snow shoes I can borrow? Remember, I asked first. :-)
Hey, doesn't that guy belong in the Dawin Awards?
We did do that. First, we have to keep the Mars surface pristine so that we can study the current Mars life. Then after Centries of researching "Life on Mars" we will go back in time and plant the cyanobacteria on the Marsian surface. :-) The headstart then turns out to be totally bogus, because we find we hampered a new technology to terraform Mars and in the end cannot terraform Mars at all. Yes, we did try to send someone back to stop the planting of cyanobacteria on Mars, but a time conflict prevented that.
Well first, the hydrocarbons will be throughly mixed into the upper atmosphere with a double dose injection. Then the sonic compressions will blast the foul mixture miles wide in trillions of cubic meters of air per centimeter. This will contribue both to global warming and ozone depletion. Though, by the time scientists figure this out, scramjets will be the only mode of transportation.