I am sorry, but that is a reasoned response on slashdot, and should be moderated Troll to teach you a lesson. (The sad thing is that it might actually happen.)
How is asking is you are still beating your girlfriend a slight? You can imply a lot with a loaded question. And if you look at mdsolar's posts and submissions, you see a decided slant. I like to consider sources I find on the Internet.
- Jail a person because they ran over someone else while drunk
If you can run over someone in the US while driving drunk in France, it may be a comparison. However, this is the US going to France and kidnapping the drunk driver for running over someone IN FRANCE. And is still a very bad analogy.
Selective enforcement is compatible with mercy, and by extension, justice. Law isn't the end goal.
Selective enforcement can be compatible with mercy. It can also be a way to punish opponents. If someone is always breaking some law (Just not normally enforced) you can just go and arrest anyone you want. (Example: Glenn Beck for this administration and Jon Stewart for the next one)
There is precedent the other way. The "Sexual Tourism" laws in the US punish US Citizens for things they do abroad that may be legal there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003 And the Internet gambling laws, and so on... Everyone likes to project power when they can. Does not make it right, but don't get too smug. (And before the trolls start, no I do not think child abuse is the same as insulting a king)
Because this legislation will not hurt Google. It makes no difference to them, and they other fights to win. It just makes a difference to us... You know... We The People.
Slashdot Mirror
Considering the new e-coli http://www.naturalnews.com/032622_ecoli_bioengineering.html#ixzz1OTqLw4WU I think we need to put the bananas nest to a melt down! :)
I am sorry, but that is a reasoned response on slashdot, and should be moderated Troll to teach you a lesson. (The sad thing is that it might actually happen.)
How is asking is you are still beating your girlfriend a slight? You can imply a lot with a loaded question. And if you look at mdsolar's posts and submissions, you see a decided slant. I like to consider sources I find on the Internet.
At least one person can read and comprehend two posts at once. :)
OK. Send me a few grand for all the old system at the office. I need Windows licenses, and a lot of memory.
Where were you last month? http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/05/17/1622255/An-IP-Address-For-Every-Light-Bulb
The adds will still work fine, I am sure.
Yep. I told that to the people at my company too... You hiring? (Note: That was a joke. But with some truth on the side.)
- Jail a person because they ran over someone else while drunk
If you can run over someone in the US while driving drunk in France, it may be a comparison. However, this is the US going to France and kidnapping the drunk driver for running over someone IN FRANCE. And is still a very bad analogy.
however, where is the petition to have this shut down? posting it up on /. would be a great idea....
How about http://klobuchar.senate.gov/emailamy.cfm http://cornyn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=ContactForm and http://coons.senate.gov/contact/ to start. I am in Texas, so I called Cornyn. Slashdot em!
Selective enforcement is compatible with mercy, and by extension, justice. Law isn't the end goal.
Selective enforcement can be compatible with mercy. It can also be a way to punish opponents. If someone is always breaking some law (Just not normally enforced) you can just go and arrest anyone you want. (Example: Glenn Beck for this administration and Jon Stewart for the next one)
There is precedent the other way. The "Sexual Tourism" laws in the US punish US Citizens for things they do abroad that may be legal there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003 And the Internet gambling laws, and so on... Everyone likes to project power when they can. Does not make it right, but don't get too smug. (And before the trolls start, no I do not think child abuse is the same as insulting a king)
No, do not relax. Get him support. Ask your Senator why you have more support in Oregon than at home?
Because this legislation will not hurt Google. It makes no difference to them, and they other fights to win. It just makes a difference to us... You know... We The People.
Go to ATM... Spit out money... "Yep, the dollar ain't what it used to be..."
Quagmire best not go to London... Gigitty.
Or, perhaps a discount source for radioactive materials? http://www.thedump.com/
Have you not read bofh?
Unless both sides are STUNed. And Skype will also not work p2p if both sides are NATed without some type of proxy.
So the last mile is the tightest, and contended. And we now know the data caps are a joke. So, still a problem.
The Humble Inde Bundle proves you wrong. Three time in a row...
I was going to say the same thing. What features am I missing? The big page of adds?
Like Ted Bundy? Perhaps you want a few more parameters...
Skype needs a server in the middle too... Unless you mean it can direct p2p after the session is initiated. Kinda like the sip canreinvite=yes option.
Linux Zealots: Smarter than Mac Zealots, but still zealots.
Priceless!