If you understood the dynamics of the english language as it is used on the internet, you'd realize that my comment was an addendum or caveat to your post.
They call that company the US Military, and require them to do all manner of menial mindnumbing tasks in exchange for a chance at a pension and a security clearance. Look into it.
Well, if we'd start teaching failure at a young age, then people would stop believing they are entitled to a piece of paper that means nothing, and would accept that having a piece of paper or spending 16 years in a classroom doesn't entitle them to anything.
I've got some CF bulbs that have moved at least twice with me that date back to 2001, and I've had some nasty power, so I'm not sure why the GP is losing bulbs.
I agree, that it is unfortunate that naked force is sometimes the only or best solution to disagreements between individuals or nation states, Remember that the same government that correctly aceded to the resonable requests of Ghandi, incorrectly acknowledged(albiet temporarily) the right of Hitler to protect his borders.
I do not agree that OWG is the solution, but I do respect your ability to reason from the facts and come to an accurate assesment of the current state of affairs between powerful nations.
I wish that it were possible to more frequently resolve disagreements at the bargaining table than on the battlefield, but I believe that we will come to a solution to "over-population" that does not involve death but instead expansion "to the stars".
And the texts of the 4 conventions can be much more easily accessed here Further, the phrase international humanitarian law is purely nonsense because international law only extends so far as nation states sign treaties between themselves.
And for future reference, Terrorists being civilian non-combatants with citizenship and residence in a non-signatory nation would fall under the 4th convention, not the first. Thanks for playing.
Democracy is based on the assumption that a million men are wiser than one man. How's that again? I missed something.
Autocracy is based on the assumption that one man is wiser than a million men. Let's play that over again, too. Who decides?
On the exact other direction, in MANY jurisdictions in the US, someone is "legally" attacking you as long as they are inside your residence, fleeing or not, unless they are restrained or detained, they can legally be acted against.
Well, there are almost no legally owned private weapons in Washington DC, and Baltimore, and those two cities have the highest gun crime rates in the country. Nearby in Arlington VA, There is a very low rate of gun crime and a very high rate of legally owned private weapons.
Slashdot Mirror
The investigation for secret is the same as for confidential.. its just a matter of pushing a button to "upgrade"
If you understood the dynamics of the english language as it is used on the internet, you'd realize that my comment was an addendum or caveat to your post.
They call that company the US Military, and require them to do all manner of menial mindnumbing tasks in exchange for a chance at a pension and a security clearance. Look into it.
Well, if we'd start teaching failure at a young age, then people would stop believing they are entitled to a piece of paper that means nothing, and would accept that having a piece of paper or spending 16 years in a classroom doesn't entitle them to anything.
If you were intelligent, competent, and motivated, you'd be a manager at that McDonalds for ~$50k a year.
And might be harder than you would expect to get a missile lock on wood and cloth.
Learning how to learn is the most important tool you can give a child, many adults lack this skill, and it shows.
Says the monkey with who joined 300k later than I did.
Its funnier if you let the readers mind fill in the blank.
You misspelled she, and you are mistaken, she's trying to come back.
Harder than drilling through permafrost in temperatures so cold that steel becomes brittle?
I've got some CF bulbs that have moved at least twice with me that date back to 2001, and I've had some nasty power, so I'm not sure why the GP is losing bulbs.
IF your power is that dirty, its likely a fire hazard as well, or at the very least, worth the investment in getting a household conditioner.
Burning or "using" oil is different than leaking. One of them leaves a poodle under your car.
I agree, that it is unfortunate that naked force is sometimes the only or best solution to disagreements between individuals or nation states, Remember that the same government that correctly aceded to the resonable requests of Ghandi, incorrectly acknowledged(albiet temporarily) the right of Hitler to protect his borders.
I do not agree that OWG is the solution, but I do respect your ability to reason from the facts and come to an accurate assesment of the current state of affairs between powerful nations.
I wish that it were possible to more frequently resolve disagreements at the bargaining table than on the battlefield, but I believe that we will come to a solution to "over-population" that does not involve death but instead expansion "to the stars".
Well, then perhaps you should purchase a new file sharing client I've never been forced to upload with this one.
So instead we get Vanverwhocares political views shoehorned into the movie. YEAH, that worked out well.
Halle berry has the right skin tone, although I'm not sure she's up for the action. Angelina Jolie would be good if not for being too recognizable.
And the texts of the 4 conventions can be much more easily accessed here
Further, the phrase international humanitarian law is purely nonsense because international law only extends so far as nation states sign treaties between themselves.
And for future reference, Terrorists being civilian non-combatants with citizenship and residence in a non-signatory nation would fall under the 4th convention, not the first. Thanks for playing.
the truly relevant passage can be found here, Just for future reference
Democracy is based on the assumption that a million men are wiser than one man. How's that again? I missed something. Autocracy is based on the assumption that one man is wiser than a million men. Let's play that over again, too. Who decides?
Robert Anson Heinlein
On the exact other direction, in MANY jurisdictions in the US, someone is "legally" attacking you as long as they are inside your residence, fleeing or not, unless they are restrained or detained, they can legally be acted against.
Well, there are almost no legally owned private weapons in Washington DC, and Baltimore, and those two cities have the highest gun crime rates in the country. Nearby in Arlington VA, There is a very low rate of gun crime and a very high rate of legally owned private weapons.
Why is this a bad thing, and why is State's duty anything other than preventing an armed foreign invasion?