are you as sure as the men who called WWI the war to end all wars??
No single european country is currently even remotely hostile to another in any way, it just doesn't make any sense that there would be any war. It contradicts the whole fact of the working union.
You euros have been loging for the days of good old Rome for over 1500 years. Many have tried to strip away your nation identities through war, now the mega rich are trying to do it through trade but the result will be the same. Your like a buck of emotionally stunted adults longing for to be kids again, get over it and grow up.
If you all want to surrender yourselves to an authority so you can compete with us, good luck to ya'. Youll learn the hard way... again..
You draw some weird conclusions, I give you that. Are you suggesting that nations age the way humans do, in the end reaching some geriatric stage? That is bizarre to say the least. It seems you also believe that the union is an authority completely separate from the countries it is made up of, from space or what?
Europe has become very stable, and I am very very sure that there will be no wars within its borders again.
I see no reason for Iraq to do anything against any European state. I am not comfortable with anyone having a bomb, especially not the nasty mass destruction bombs. The problems can only increase with bombs. I don't believe that Iraq will launch any missile unless they are attacked. I can see Mr. Bush attack them well this fall though, as the congress election is coming up and about everything but the crushing of limbs and expensive equipment is diving over there.
Face it, your country gained it's position with oil and wants to prevent the discovery of a replacement at any cost.
Europe was not united when world war 2 occured. Germany was the strongest military power in Europe at that time. European countries have a tradition of not budgeting so much weapons, in favour of things that their people gain from, but the european union has more people and greater monetary reserves than the U.S.
If you take a quick look at some economic statistics, you will see that your beloved country was gaining funds at a high rate during the mandate of this man, and now you are being robbed again. Isn't it wonderful to see all those billions of your hard earned national funds (you paid for it) being baked into exquisite deadly machinery and blown to pieces with a bunch of peasants on the other side of the world.
>Probably because the Muslims already found a >better way to conqueror you Europeans types. >In 500 years at current rates, Europe will be >all Muslim. Something to think about.
I see, your particular interrests in the conflict seem to be getting rid of people who don't think like you. That's a subject of admiration, let's all give the righteous and true americans a jolly applause.
>There is no excuse for the slaughter of innocent >civilans.
The problem with this sentence is the bush-crypto. Decrypted version: "There is no excuse for the slaughter of american civilians, any other is fine, our media will filter it out for some sweet green paper."
>We're loathed because we're successful. Same with >the Isrealis.
Actually, I feel sorry for you guys, having to maintain that superficial and bogus national character all your lives. Not to forget, Americans are the English, Dutch, Portuguese and Spanish people that the European colonisation fleets left there few hundred years ago. Your country has no history but the indians, and their blood is also on your hands. The lack of heritage is probably why you seem so oblivious to the extreme inhumane nature of your country's moves internationally. I hope you wake up with a smile on your face every morning, satisfied in knowing that your dollars are being employed exactly for what you chose in the election, spilling blood and oppressing.
>What puppet state are we supporting in the >region? The only one that even comes close is >Saudi Arabia, and I'd dare say that they're >next on the list.
Oh dear, I believe we've met Mr.Indoctrinated himself. Your country wanted the russians out of Afghanistan, so you raised a terrorist army. This terrorist army had friends which were oppressed by other hypocrite moves made by your country, for instance the palestinians and the iraqi. Some of them decided to give your country some of it's own medicine, by means of a cowardly act (which your country has made countless). This cowardly act killed but a few thousands of your country's people, and yet, to you it seems as if it's the first time someone got killed. Man, your media holds you by the spinal cord. You are helping them every day. Your media is owned by the very rich. The very rich protect the interrests of the very rich. Every time I hear an American speak on the subject, he sounds almost psychotic in again and again trying to assure to himself that patriotism is the answer. Is patriotism the solution? What is patriotism going to do to a conflict? It doesn't take a genious to answer this, but to get an honest answer, maybe it takes a non-patriot.
>The missile defense has nothing to do with >fighting terrorists per se, but is a method of >protecting North America from the occasional >rogue missile from unfriendly nation states.
And again, don't you ever wonder why these states have become unfriendly? Do you really think they hate your country for no reason? If the U.S. government would for once be unselfish, let a few oil, locational and religion-related strongholds go, declare neutrality and conformance with the U.N. policy, and withdraw to a normal international discussion, they could resolve this whole conflict within months. Better yet, as your government swear by the grace of god, in god we trust and so on, you could even call it a great act of christian compassion. Turn the other cheek aside, remember?
Anyway, the decadence of the american people's spirit is the main problem in my opinion. Listen to Eminem, that guy puts it in clear text sometimes.
Slashdot Mirror
You draw some weird conclusions, I give you that. Are you suggesting that nations age the way humans do, in the end reaching some geriatric stage? That is bizarre to say the least. It seems you also believe that the union is an authority completely separate from the countries it is made up of, from space or what?
Europe has become very stable, and I am very very sure that there will be no wars within its borders again.
>- a proud american
Cool, a proud anonymous american.
I see no reason for Iraq to do anything against any European state. I am not comfortable with anyone having a bomb, especially not the nasty mass destruction bombs. The problems can only increase with bombs. I don't believe that Iraq will launch any missile unless they are attacked. I can see Mr. Bush attack them well this fall though, as the congress election is coming up and about everything but the crushing of limbs and expensive equipment is diving over there.
Face it, your country gained it's position with oil and wants to prevent the discovery of a replacement at any cost.
Europe was not united when world war 2 occured. Germany was the strongest military power in Europe at that time. European countries have a tradition of not budgeting so much weapons, in favour of things that their people gain from, but the european union has more people and greater monetary reserves than the U.S.
Wow, what aggression, I guess I was right because it seems that hurt.
>No, I said Bill Clinton specifically.
If you take a quick look at some economic statistics, you will see that your beloved country was gaining funds at a high rate during the mandate of this man, and now you are being robbed again. Isn't it wonderful to see all those billions of your hard earned national funds (you paid for it) being baked into exquisite deadly machinery and blown to pieces with a bunch of peasants on the other side of the world.
>Probably because the Muslims already found a
>better way to conqueror you Europeans types.
>In 500 years at current rates, Europe will be
>all Muslim. Something to think about.
I see, your particular interrests in the conflict seem to be getting rid of people who don't think like you. That's a subject of admiration, let's all give the righteous and true americans a jolly applause.
>There is no excuse for the slaughter of innocent
>civilans.
The problem with this sentence is the bush-crypto. Decrypted version: "There is no excuse for the slaughter of american civilians, any other is fine, our media will filter it out for some sweet green paper."
>We're loathed because we're successful. Same with
>the Isrealis.
Actually, I feel sorry for you guys, having to maintain that superficial and bogus national character all your lives. Not to forget, Americans are the English, Dutch, Portuguese and Spanish people that the European colonisation fleets left there few hundred years ago. Your country has no history but the indians, and their blood is also on your hands. The lack of heritage is probably why you seem so oblivious to the extreme inhumane nature of your country's moves internationally. I hope you wake up with a smile on your face every morning, satisfied in knowing that your dollars are being employed exactly for what you chose in the election, spilling blood and oppressing.
>What puppet state are we supporting in the
>region? The only one that even comes close is
>Saudi Arabia, and I'd dare say that they're
>next on the list.
Oh dear, I believe we've met Mr.Indoctrinated himself.
Your country wanted the russians out of Afghanistan, so you raised a terrorist army.
This terrorist army had friends which were oppressed by other hypocrite moves made by your country, for instance the palestinians and the iraqi.
Some of them decided to give your country some of it's own medicine, by means of a cowardly act (which your country has made countless).
This cowardly act killed but a few thousands of your country's people, and yet, to you it seems as if it's the first time someone got killed.
Man, your media holds you by the spinal cord. You are helping them every day.
Your media is owned by the very rich. The very rich protect the interrests of the very rich.
Every time I hear an American speak on the subject, he sounds almost psychotic in again and again trying to assure to himself that patriotism is the answer. Is patriotism the solution? What is patriotism going to do to a conflict? It doesn't take a genious to answer this, but to get an honest answer, maybe it takes a non-patriot.
>The missile defense has nothing to do with
>fighting terrorists per se, but is a method of
>protecting North America from the occasional
>rogue missile from unfriendly nation states.
And again, don't you ever wonder why these states have become unfriendly? Do you really think they hate your country for no reason?
If the U.S. government would for once be unselfish, let a few oil, locational and religion-related strongholds go, declare neutrality and conformance with the U.N. policy, and withdraw to a normal international discussion, they could resolve this whole conflict within months. Better yet, as your government swear by the grace of god, in god we trust and so on, you could even call it a great act of christian compassion. Turn the other cheek aside, remember?
Anyway, the decadence of the american people's spirit is the main problem in my opinion.
Listen to Eminem, that guy puts it in clear text sometimes.