Slashdot Mirror


Xbox Runs X, KDE, Gnome, StarOffice and Tuxracer

freax writes "Today in the the xbox-linux mailinglist: I'm typing this into KMail using a USB keybaord (and a USB mouse) in front of the TV connected to the Xbox. ... and even StarOffice works quite fine. TuxRacer also runs (look at the new screenhots on the website), but only with one frame per second. Check out screenshots here."

499 comments

  1. Tux racer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, just like my PC's linux box.

    1. Re:tux racer by PyrotekNX · · Score: 1

      Tux Racer will run at that speed unless accelerated drivers are installed in x which i doubt they have gotten to yet.

      Maybe the linux nvidia drivers will run on that. If they do then the speed will be more like 60fps.

    2. Re:Tux racer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you can mod me to your hearts content, but it won't change the truth: Tuxracer sucks.

  2. Can you run Wine? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the question now is whether you can run the X-Box emulator on the result.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Can you run Wine? by tuoppi · · Score: 0

      Why emulate? It is a P3 afterall - why not run games natively?

    2. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      How the fuck is this modded to +5 Funny?

      Some mods are complete jackholes.

    3. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa. The scary part is, now I really want an XBOX!!! Must have coolest linux console!

    4. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no xbox emulator.

    5. Re:Can you run Wine? by Indras · · Score: 4, Funny

      So the question now is whether you can run the X-Box emulator on the result.

      And if you can, will it be faster than the original, because of the OS upgrade? ::grins::

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    6. Re:Can you run Wine? by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1, Informative

      The processor doesn't need to be emulated, but the API's can. Think wine.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    7. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The processor doesn't need to be emulated, but the API's can. Think wine.

      Wine Is Not an Emulator.

    8. Re:Can you run Wine? by Istealmymusic · · Score: 0

      I didn't capitalize wine, so you are not allowed to expand it as an acronym. Besides, we all know it implements not emulates the Win32 API, but unless you're a Slashdot troll, what difference does it make?

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    9. Re:Can you run Wine? by HeUnique · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And here's the REALLY scary part! if you buy an XBox today, most chances that even if you manage to install some mod chip - the xbox-linux won't run on it. MS changed chips and code based on the analysis of the MIT hacker...

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    10. Re:Can you run Wine? by Istealmymusic · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Not at the moment. However, CXBX is a work-in-progress. Some relevant portions from the page:
      How hard is it to create an emulator for the XBox? Unlike the other major new next generation consoles I think the XBox will probably be the easiest to emulate. The architecture and operating system of the XBox so much resemble a Windows PC that it may be possible to simply convert XBox games to Windows. That is, replacing the system calls of XBox applications (the games) with substitutes when emulating it. This may seem hard and impossible to do (converting executables to work on other, but similar operating systems for similar architectures), but in fact it has already been done before: Project Odin allows Windows applications such as Quake 3 or Starcraft for example, to be run on IBM's OS/2 Warp.
      CXBX replaces system calls in XBox boxes (a Microsoft term for application) with Win32 API system calls, allowing for direct execution of the box. However, some system calls still need to be replaced by hand. But of course, who needs to emulate an XBOX when you can emulate on an XBOX? (Thanks to Emulator Zone for this useful information I'm sure all readers will be interested in.)
      • MAME-X What do you mean, 70+ games for the XBox? Try over 3000! This is a port of MAME for the XBox which allows you to play tons of arcade classics on the XBox.
      • GNUboy Yes! The all time favorite handheld is here! This is the Xbox port of the Gameboy emulator.
      • Handy The Atari Lynx emulator has been ported to the box... If I could only fit it in my pocket...
      • Stella The known atari 2600 emulator has come to the xbox!
      • Daedalus The N64 emulator is progressing well on the Xbox too!
      • Snes9X That's right... SNES on the xbox!!! snes9x..only 12-x years late!
      • GBA-X GBA on the Xbox...
      • X-Nes NES on the xbox.
      • SMSPlus Master System/Game Gear emulator.
      • FCEU-NES NES emulator. known for accurate emulation of offensive language

      Hope this helps. Enjoy emulating on your box!

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    11. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only on slashdot can the truth be considered "flamebait"

      so sad people. try to grow up sometime.

    12. Re:Can you run Wine? by checkyoulater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How the fuck is this modded to +5 Funny?

      Because it is funny? Geez, don't be so sensitive...

      Maybe you should refrain from posting until you understand irony.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    13. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how close is Bush to shutting down Bin Laden after a year?

    14. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And how close is Bush to shutting down Bin Laden after a year?

      He's probably dead right now. Do you know for sure otherwise?

      This doesn't change the point that the Sudanese offered Bin Laden to Clinton three times and he turned them down each time!

      They begged for him to take Bin Laden, and Clinton did nothing, because it wasn't popular. That's Clinton's legacy. Nothing will change the fact that Bill Clinton is solely responsible for the worst terroist attack in American history.

      Go ahead, try to spin it. The truth remains.

    15. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how many attacks have there been since 9/11?

      there you go.

    16. Re:Can you run Wine? by ActiveSX · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How the fuck is this modded to +1 Insightful?

      Some mods are complete jackholes.

    17. Re:Can you run Wine? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      How the fuck is this modded to +5 Funny?

      Yeah, it should have been +5 Insightful.

      Hey just what else are you going to do on a box that has a low end pentium and outputs only to a TV?

      It is a cool hack but at the end of the day you can get the same effect much more easily by adding a $60 TV out card to a PC. I just put together a PC upgrade with a new motherboard, processor, video card and memory for $350. So OK thats a tad more expensive than the $200 of an Xbox but the result is a heck of a lot more useful.

      And don't get me started on the 'cheap supercomputer' idea, no you can put as many Xboxen together as you like, you are not going to break any price performance barriers because the price/performance of your basic block is simply not cutting edge, even with Microsoft making a loss on every unit. Also whatever you gained in hardware savings would be rapidly lost through the cost of powering a farm of the damn things. If you want cutting edge price/performance get boxes that don't waste money on a disk, have a larger processor, more RAM and come with multiple LAN ports.

      So logically once you have the X-box running linux the next thing to do is run Wine and then the Xbox emulator. The Multics or Lisp machine emulators would also be pretty cool. Alternatively if someone could get a ZXSpectrum emulator up and running on it.

      As it stands this hack is pretty much like the fact my Zaurus runs Linux, kewl but completely irrelevant to why I have the device.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    18. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the guys who actually committed the attack have no responsibility?

    19. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grr. Must help project break new chip. Must make a mod chip that MS can't counter-hack...

    20. Re:Can you run Wine? by warmcat · · Score: 2

      In fact there have been no reports of the new version of the xbox out in the wild yet. I think MS have warehouses full of the old ones to get rid of.

      I purchased a second one for routing/ printerserver duties last Friday, and it was manufactured in May 2002. So I think we're still pretty safe for a few weeks.

    21. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey just what else are you going to do on a box that has a low end pentium and outputs only to a TV?

      You're going to use it as a cheap, portable, disposable computer in countries and locations where shipping a full size tower may not be the easiest thing to do E.g. Aid Agencies in Afghanistan, medical agencies in Africa and Aisa, general teaching use...

      Not to mention the posability of constructing relativly low cost booth terminals.

    22. Re:Can you run Wine? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      Xbox is now £159 in the UK. This means I am getting something which can be used as a Linux box very inexpensively.

      Instead of having to pay a lot of money for a SOHO network server (broadband router/smtp/file server/firewall/etc) I can now pay £159 and let Microsoft subsidise the rest.

      Don't get me wrong, I wouldnt want an Xbox as my main workstation - the specs aren't powerful enough - but running Linux on an Xbox does have its uses.

      Tim

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    23. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just like all the creationist "truths" are trolls

    24. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >He's probably dead right now. Do you know for
      >sure otherwise?

      No. So what? The US wanted him dead - its a bit lame to say `oh, he`s probably dead`. With the American's record, its actually more likely that hes perfectly safe in Pakistan, just like the Nazi's were after the second world war.

      Oh, and the reason people don't want to back America in the possible war against Iraq is that they know theres more chance of being killed (by Americans) if we`re on their side than if we backed Iraq!!

    25. Re:Can you run Wine? by wheany · · Score: 2

      Or you could just go and buy the official Playstation 2 Linux kit. And you don't have to possibly ruin your console by installing a modchip...

      And the best part is (because we all know Microsoft is eeeeevil), you are not giving Microsoft (or in slash-speak: "Micro$oft") any money.

    26. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck is this moderated to Score:0, Offtopic?

    27. Re:Can you run Wine? by Hrshgn · · Score: 1

      If you buy an XBOX, install Linux and never buy any XBOX games you are actually getting money from MS.

    28. Re:Can you run Wine? by wheany · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What? Do you honestly think when you go and buy an Xbox, the clerk behind the counter pushes a magic button, and an Xbox factory churns out just one Xbox that is delivered to you post haste?

      No.

      Microsoft has made (and paid for) hudreds of thousands of Xboxes beforehand, and have them sitting in a warehouse somewhere, waiting to be delivered to customers. They might actually be in a backroom of your local game-boutique, but anyway, Microsoft has already lost money making the consoles. What you are doing is giving them back some of that money. Think about it...

    29. Re:Can you run Wine? by sh00z · · Score: 1

      IANAA (I am not an accountant), but won't they be able to write off those unsold warehoused boxes on their Federal taxes at the end of the year? Better to buy one to make *sure* they lose money...

    30. Re:Can you run Wine? by wheany · · Score: 1

      So why do corporations lose money at all? They can always write off any losses on their taxes, right?

    31. Re:Can you run Wine? by kableh · · Score: 2

      Nothing will change the fact that Bill Clinton is solely responsible for the worst terroist attack in American history.

      Yea, I'm sure Reagan arming and training Al Qaeda has nothing to do with that. Or America's ass-backwards foreign policy for the past 30 years.

      Conservative assholes like you blasting Clinton for his past transgressions make me sick. Get over it. Try questioning the Federalist asshole you have respresenting your party now instead.

  3. Wahoo! by Jacer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have an X-box, and NO games, just the DVD kit. (I entered the taco bell challenge 600 times!!) Now I can do something other than play DVD's on it!

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    1. Re:Wahoo! by cioxx · · Score: 3, Funny

      I entered the taco bell challenge 600 times!!

      I hope your ass exploded from all those burritos.

    2. Re:Wahoo! by Jacer · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      i just took a hand-ful of tickets each time i went there, which was every day because my friend (who doesn't have a car and works there) always needed me to pick him up

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    3. Re:Wahoo! by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I entered the taco bell challenge 600 times!!
      Your name wouldn't happen to be Lazlo Hollyfeld?
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    4. Re:Wahoo! by Wizy · · Score: 1

      Real genius is the best movie of all time.

    5. Re:Wahoo! by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      Yes it is. :-)

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    6. Re:Wahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kazaa search initiated...

      dammit, not Jimmy Neutron!

      Anybody got Real Genius? Put it on Kazaa, por favor!

    7. Re:Wahoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got my penis stretcher on ebay. Wanna try it?

  4. What about games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will linux on the xbox have good game support? ;-)

  5. Prize ? by kila_m · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this mean someone will win get the $200,000 ?

    1. Re:Prize ? by *xpenguin* · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Probably only $100,000, because the second step of the project hasn't been completed (make it legal and have it run without a mod chip). It sure looks impossible to me.

    2. Re:Prize ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. The modchip is still required. This is part of it though.

    3. Re:Prize ? by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that only way to do it is to find bug in Xbox BIOS (or whatever - but this will be surely fixed by MS) or brute-force decrypt CDs signing key so we'll be able to sign Linux CD as regular Xbox application.

    4. Re:Prize ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh, did somebody say distributed processing? Come on then, talk about massive civil disobedience. Fucking come on then!

    5. Re:Prize ? by reverius · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but brute-force decryption doesn't sound legal (think DMCA). I think they keyword for the prize money was "legal" way of doing it.

    6. Re:Prize ? by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but fuck DMCA! Here in Europe is it completely legal (at least now). World - USA != 0

    7. Re:Prize ? by Nameles · · Score: 1

      It makes me wonder if MS can legally enact DMCA on the XBOX, since it's an American item? Ignore the fact that it's made in Mexico and other such places. I doubt they can legally, but they will find a way to do it because America = world.

    8. Re:Prize ? by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but fuck DMCA! Here in Europe is it completely legal (at least now).

      I hate to tell you this, but the EU is considering a DMCA type law of its own. The DMCA was brought about because of a WTO treaty that more or less required it. EU signed this treaty, too.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    9. Re:Prize ? by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      There's nothing in DMCA that prohibits cracking a key that is used for signing.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    10. Re:Prize ? by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 1

      There are moments when I love Czech republic not being in EU ;o)

    11. Re:Prize ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That contradicts your previous statement, you fucking dumbass. You said "Here in Europe", yet here you claim to be in the Czech republic? Make up your mind, moron.

      Thanks,
      -The English Troll

    12. Re:Prize ? by mrmag00 · · Score: 1

      And that means what to a large team of lawyers?

    13. Re:Prize ? by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Surely the second method would violate the DMCA, and not qualify for the other half of the money (illegal)?

      The legality of the first might depend on what the bug was, I guess... Still I'm sure the legality or lack thereof won't frighten people, there's a roaring trade in PSX modchips despite their grey status.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    14. Re:Prize ? by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 1

      I don't see how it would violate DMCA IF you don't do it in USA (and maybe EU). If you take "final product", it is completely legal even when proces used for creating isn't legal in USA. It's like buying goods from state with lower legal working age.

    15. Re:Prize ? by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      It means DMCA is about as useful to them as a city ordinance against having a dog bark loudly all night. They can bully outside the system, but if it ever comes before a judge, they lose. Even Kaplan's wackiness and corruption has limits, I suspect.

      I'm just a hopeless idealist, aren't I? ;-)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    16. Re:Prize ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      To have a brute forced key would allow for signed applications to run on the platform. This would increase interoperability. There is an exception clause in the DMCA that allows for this.

      Please read the Act.

      Chapter 12
      Section 1201

      (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a)(1)(A), a person who has lawfully obtained the right to use a copy of a computer program may circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a particular portion of that program for the sole purpose of identifying and analyzing those elements of the program that are necessary to achieve interoperability of an independently created computer program with other programs, and that have not previously been readily available to the person engaging in the circumvention, to the extent any such acts of identification and analysis do not constitute infringement under this title.

      (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b), a person may develop and employ technological means to circumvent a technological measure, or to circumvent protection afforded by a technological measure, in order to enable the identification and analysis under paragraph (1), or for the purpose of enabling interoperability of an independently created computer program with other programs, if such means are necessary to achieve such interoperability, to the extent that doing so does not constitute infringement under this title.

    17. Re:Prize ? by kubrick · · Score: 2
      True -- I guess I assumed the prize donator specified US laws, but I'm not sure about that. The prize money is in US$.

      Still, give them ten years and the only places you will be able to do this will be China, North Korea et. al.

      Actually, part two specifies unsigned code must run without hardware mods; thus brute-forcing a key is not an option.

      From the site:

      Project B: Run unsigned code on an Xbox without any hardware modification

      Development of a CD-ROM (image) that makes an unmodified Xbox run any unsigned code from the CD, and can make the Xbox start bootloader code as described in Task 4 (with the Xbox kernel intact) or as in Task 1 (with the Xbox kernel not being used any more).


      & "All solutions have to be legal." They don't give jurisdiction, so I assume that applies globally, including the US.
      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    18. Re:Prize ? by kistel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but it will be an EU guideline, not a law. This will be implemented by laws independently in each member country. And, this will not happen too fast.

      IMHO the main problem is that the EU tries to follow the US in many ways, even if those are Not Good(tm).

      Who was it who said "We'd better follow the American's dreams instead of the American dream..."?

    19. Re:Prize ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 10 years, the only place you'll be able to buy a PC is China, North Korea et. al. The rest of us will be using XBox2 and PS3s with "copy-protection", aka. "Trusted computing architecture"

    20. Re:Prize ? by kill-1 · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but it will be an EU guideline, not a law. This will be implemented by laws independently in each member country. And, this will not happen too fast.

      Well, here in Germany we probably have our version of the DMCA by the end of the year. That's fast enough.
    21. Re:Prize ? by kubrick · · Score: 2


      I'm guessing the word 'trusted' here doesn't apply to the customer?
      </tongue_in_cheek>

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    22. Re:Prize ? by egreB · · Score: 1

      Good thing Norway's not a member of EU, then. But the way norwegian policies are at the time, it's not too unlikely they'll pass the law in Norway. I sure hope not.

  6. Finally by davidstrauss · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can spend $200 on a poor-quality, non-upgradable (and non-waranteed) Pentium III instead of building my own for about the same amount.

    1. Re:Finally by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pentium III ? More likely Celery^Hon according to this screenshot...

    2. Re:Finally by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

      According to http://www.chipworks.com/news/11Xbox.htm, it does use an Intel Pentium III. Ignoring certain information returned by a processor can falsely indicate its speed and model. Early releases of Windows 98 said PIIIs were PIIs.

    3. Re:Finally by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 1

      According to this page and this one, it uses the Celeron. Well, mabye they used the PIIIs at first, then switched to Celerons later to keep the price very low. That's a possibility. Or mabye they used a P3 with the cache reduced (isn't that a Celeron anyway ?)...

    4. Re:Finally by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I can spend $200 on a poor-quality, non-upgradable (and non-waranteed) Pentium III instead of building my own for about the same amount"

      I'm sure Linux users everywhere are ready to buy a PC from Microsoft so they can run Linux on it. Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Finally by norton_I · · Score: 2

      What I have heard is that they used a custom PIII/Celeron with a 100 MHz FSB, 128K cache, and a different cache associativity (higher) than either the PIII or the PIII Celeron.

      I don't remember the exact deal with the cache, but the configuration is not identical to any desktop or mobile PIII Intel sold.

    6. Re:Finally by peterprior · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm.. thinking about it.. seeing as Microsoft is making a loss on every box sold, and hoping to make money on the games instead, if we ALL by an xbox but no games, Microsoft should go bust :D

    7. Re:Finally by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

      I believe Celerons produced during the PIII era used a PII core.

    8. Re:Finally by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Smart move. Not only will you cause damage to the game market (which, btw, lends a huge hand to making the PC market successful), but you also give MS reason to buy a few senators and get shit like the SSSCA passed.

      If you don't believe what I'm saying will happen, then here's an alternative point of view: You can't possibly buy enough XBOXes to make MS go broke. 10 million would have to be sold in order for MS to lose 1.5 billion.

      There's no way 10 million people would buy XBOXes and go "Yeah! Im screwing ms!!" and not think about doing something practical with them, like playing games.

      Face it, you're not going to succeed at doing anything but make MS invest more in DRM. Good choice.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Finally by HansRH · · Score: 1

      That is my understanding as well. Despite the fact that it has 128K L2 Cache like its Celeron sibling, the cache is 8-way set associative like the PIII.

      Sources: Anandtech (specifically discussing Xbox and other consoles), and Firingsquad discussion of PIII and Celeron differences.

      Hans

    10. Re:Finally by peterprior · · Score: 1

      I'm very sorry... what was I thinking?

    11. Re:Finally by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      I apologize for not seeing the humor. You're not the only one that suggested buying systems to screw MS. The other dude sounded pretty serious about it.

      Sorry bud. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:Finally by peterprior · · Score: 1

      np... :)

    13. Re:Finally by Stormie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pentium III ? More likely Celery^Hon according to this screenshot...

      Actually the Xbox CPU is neither a P-III nor a Celeron, but something inbetween. It has only 128KB of L2 cache (like a Celeron, a real P-III has 256KB), but that cache is 8-way set associative (like a real P-III, a Celeron only has 4-way set associative cache).

    14. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Early releases of Windows 98 said PIIIs were PIIs.

      Yeah, because Win98 didn't KNOW about P3's. Kernel 2.4.18 knows that P3's exist, and the fact that it calls it a celeron is significant.

    15. Re:Finally by Aceticon · · Score: 2

      That's in the US.

      Here in Europe you get the previledge of spending $450 on an X-Box

    16. Re:Finally by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I hate to question the logic of engineers, but it does seem pointless to me to keep the cache size the same, but make it 8-way set associative.

      1-way Set associative means that basically you can't store two numbers with the same lower bits. This isn't that big a deal, since memory is usually used fairly contiguosly (sp?), so the lower bits change a lot.

      However, you do sometimes want to cache two address with the same lower bits, so to do this they came up with the idea of 2-way set associative, where you divide the memory in half, and make half of it a place to put the second-address with the same lower bits.
      I'm not very good with explanations.

      But basically, say 4-way set associative was good enough not kick out cached values too early, then changing that to 8-way would halve the effective cache, without helping anything.
      They are banking on 4-way overflowed too often.
      Which I'm very surprised at, as games do tend to run in very small memory and code loops.

      I'm going to shut up now..

    17. Re:Finally by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      $450?

      The price of Xbox in the UK is now £159 (around US$ 250. Which part of Europe still has them at this price?

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    18. Re:Finally by AYeomans · · Score: 1

      Or you can spend $200 on an upgradable warranteed 800 MHz PC with LindowsOS.

      If only they were available in UK. Still, the X-Box is now $201+tax, not too bad an exchange rate.

      --
      Andrew Yeomans
    19. Re:Finally by Hanul · · Score: 1

      Price dropped to 249 (from 299) in Germay last week. 479 was just in the first few weeks. Sales were so low MS had to cut the price nearly in half now.

    20. Re:Finally by Stormie · · Score: 2

      I hate to question the logic of engineers, but it does seem pointless to me to keep the cache size the same, but make it 8-way set associative.

      Well, I guess the important thing is that having the 128KB cache instead of 256KB saves money (obviously vital for a games console), whereas going with the 4-way cache instead of 8-way wouldn't save much if anything.

      However, you do sometimes want to cache two address with the same lower bits, so to do this they came up with the idea of 2-way set associative, where you divide the memory in half, and make half of it a place to put the second-address with the same lower bits.

      2-way set associative means that each piece of memory can be cached in two different places (and when it needs to be cached, some algorithm e.g. Least Recently Used will be used to decide which of those places it should be cached). This is unquestionably a good thing, it means you can avoid ping-ponging if two subroutines being called alternately both happen to map to the same cacheline. It certainly doesn't mean that you can only cache half as much stuff or anything bad like that.

      8-way set associative is quite high.. probably high enough that as long as your code fits in cache, you won't get any evictions due to different chunks of code fighting over the same cachelines..

      There can be a performance drawback to increasing n in an n-way set associative cache, as the increased complexity of the cache lookup logic means that it can be slower to retrieve a cacheline. I have no idea if there is a difference in practice between the P-III and Celeron L2 caches, though.

    21. Re:Finally by Aceticon · · Score: 2

      Netherlands

      It was just a cursory look - maybe i could find a cheaper price if i looked harder

    22. Re:Finally by sheean.nl · · Score: 1

      Eur 270

      --

      If at first you don't succeed, then sky diving definitely isn't for you.
    23. Re:Finally by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      The idea is that you can cache two bits of memory with the same lower bits. We both agree with that (I think - your wording is slightly wrong at the start).

      But if you do this, then it means you split the cache into 2, and only use the second half if the first half location is used up. _If_ you don't ever have 2 hits with the same lsb, then you won't use the second half.

      HMM. Thinking about it, we are both right - you more than me. Because you have split it into 2, you are halving your range (you reduce the number of bits that you include in you lsb by one) and so what would originally go in the second half, now tries to go in the first half, then overflows to the second half. Ah..

      So yes, there is no drawback. (other than what you mentioned)

  7. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now I can finally play TuxRacer at one FPS instead of all those crappy professionally made Xbox games!

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halo is crappy?... ::stares in disbelief::

    2. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fell for such an obvious troll? ::Experiences extreme boggling of the mind::

    3. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      1) Controls suck. FPS games NEED a keyboard and mouse combination.

      2) Levels are tedious and repetative.

      3) Graphics are sub-par compared to modern PC titles.

  8. more screenshots? by kemster · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have some screenshots of the Xbox playing games with Wine running on X and Linux? Because if I can play PC games with Wine, X, and Linux on it (and a modchip of course), then I'll definitely get one.

    1. Re:more screenshots? by lmfr · · Score: 1

      As you can see by the frame rate of tux racer, no accelerated driver exists for Linux, and it probably wont ever, for no specs exist, no open source driver exists with 3d acceleration, and I really doubt NVidia will have one available for that card. (Until someone hacks the driver?)

    2. Re:more screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hadn't considered that. Someone reverse engineering the driver might make a port back to Lunix. Neato!

    3. Re:more screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nVidia drivers are an opensource wrapper to a closed-source binary kernel module. It's not at all portable.

    4. Re:more screenshots? by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

      just how different is the Xbox hardware? i always thought it was a pc with a hand held controller and a TV out.

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    5. Re:more screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're really paranoid, one might suspect that the nVidia drivers are closed source precisely to keep accelerated 3D off a linux xbox

    6. Re:more screenshots? by wheany · · Score: 1

      You were wrong.

    7. Re:more screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xbox-linux.sf.net has more info, but the xbox is pretty much a geforce3 ti and a celeron 733... all the components for a PC exists on it's sytem board, and most are utilized with xbox linux

  9. Mirror before it gets slashdotted by barureddy · · Score: 1

    I don't run any servers so I can't provide the bandwidth.

    1. Re:Mirror before it gets slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its on source forge, dont worry, it should just sssllllloooowwwww dddoowwwnnn... :)

    2. Re:Mirror before it gets slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gimme! Gimme! Gimme!

      Now! Now! Now!

  10. Almost like by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    a PC!

    [No wait! Zot!] NO CARRIER

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Almost like by tshak · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Just like the PS2! Dumbass.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    2. Re:Almost like by Matey-O · · Score: 2

      OR a dreamcast, toaster, hottub.

      YOUR point?

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  11. Mod chip is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is fantastic, but the problem is the modchip, if Linux could be started without mod-chip. X-Box Linux will be a killer app!!!

    1. Re:Mod chip is the problem by wheany · · Score: 1

      You are sadly mistaken. The closest thing to a killer app on the Xbox was Halo.

      Who in their right mind would think that Linux would sell more Xboxes than any game released on the Xbox.

  12. Wow...impressive by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 0

    Does the xbox have a video card with DRI support? That'd make the frame rate more reasonable...

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  13. finally a reason to buy a box by Lewis+Mettler,+Esq. · · Score: 1

    Just kidding.

    --
    NexuSys - Linux support by the best
  14. 1 frame per second? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with or without DRI enabled?

    1. Re:1 frame per second? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It shouldn't matter! The XBox has the graphics power of a GeForce 3, and should eat Tux Racer for breakfast.

      It looks like this guys have a LOT of optimization work ahead of them.

  15. More importantly, how about Apache... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Samba, FTP, POP, NNTP, Squid, NFS, Grid engine.

    Y'know, all those services that an ISP or similar might find handy in a *big* server farm.

    Hey, how's about a Beowulf of those. :)

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by David+McBride · · Score: 1

      Much better than that.. you can have a Linux server farm sponsored by Microsoft. They subsidize production and sell those things at a loss, remember.

    2. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? This thing is the antithesis of server class hardware. It's a consumer toy, designed as cheaply as possible, with tons of things attempting to prevent you from doing computer-like things with it.

      If even one of these things makes it into a commercial server environment, I will be very surprised.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      Well, if they can run stuff like X11 and StarOffice (!) on it, I'm pretty sure everything on your list is supported (assuming there is no problem with the NIC)

    4. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Replace "commercial server environment" with "mp3 server for the kitchen"

      Actually I would get one if it can play DivX movies with it without modchip (Linux or no Linux)

    5. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by littleRedFriend · · Score: 1

      If you want MS to sell a lot of these babies, without making profit on the games, get Internet Explorer and Outlook running on it. I would buy a dozen for the office.

      --
      IANAL, but imagine a beowulf cluster of in Soviet Russia all your belong are base to us welcoming the new SCO overlords.
    6. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Not any more. The XBox has been in production long enough that they cost less to make than they sell for. And Microsoft wrote off the development costs against taxes a year ago.

      They make a profit on the boxes, now.

      --
      -- Alastair
    7. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad idea. The power consumption and heat would kill your server farm. A typical 1U rackmount box takes 1/10th the power and generates 1/10th the heat as an XBox. Over the long haul (12 months) what you save in upfront cost you lose in electrical and cooling bills - nevermind the cost to lease more floor space for the larger XBox boxes.

    8. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by revoemag · · Score: 1

      Nope. Its pretty much commonly known that MS is still losing money on each console. Unlike PS2 and GC, the X-box has 2 extra pieces of hardware. The HD and the LAN adapter. And they have not sold enough hardware yet.

    9. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by faaaz · · Score: 1

      Why would you need Internet Explorer or Outlook? You can use Mozilla and Sylpheed instead, at least that's what we use at the office.

      --
      we come in peace / shoot to kill
  16. Doom 3 by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is awesome! Why is this awesome? Because now people who have an Xbox will be able to play Doom3 at the *same time* that it comes out for the PC.

    All this without the Anal Leakage (TM) that is the Xbox gamepad.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Doom 3 by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

      Why is this awesome? Because now people who have an Xbox will be able to play Doom3 at the *same time* that it comes out for the PC.

      Well, maybe you and a couple other people in the world.

  17. keybaord by *xpenguin* · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm typing this into KMail using a USB keybaord

    Looks like it's a buggy USB keybaord.

    1. Re:keybaord by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1

      I'm leaning towards the fact that due to Microsoft Ethernet vulnerabilties, a varius (probably kaoshide) infected the WM_LBUTTONDOWN message queue. That seems more likely on an MS system.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    2. Re:keybaord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like it's a buggy USB keybaord.

      No, it's called a typo. You know... like the typing mistakes you make when you're jerking off with one hand and typing with the other. Because anal retentive nerds like yourself can't get a date.

      "Hi I'm Scott."

      "Hey Scott. I'm Sarah and this is Jennifer. Me and her are going to see a movie."

      [Scott shifts to Mr. Brainiac mode] "Hahah. You should have said *Her and I* are going..."

      [Sarah and Jennifer walk away and Scott hears one of them say "What a fucking dork."]

    3. Re:keybaord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Actually, she should have said "*She and I* are going..."
      </brainiac mode>

    4. Re:keybaord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's called a joke

  18. The Linux Che by zapf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Check out this picture.

    "this is the beginning of microsoft's end."

    Because everyone knows that Tux Racer is going to be the catalyst for change.

    Oh, and GLTron.

  19. Why this is a good thing by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There's a reason why I think this is a Good Thing, and it goes beyond some stupid "Microsoft sucks, make them spend money!"

    This is the true beginning of a low cost, easy to use system. If the boot up totally doesn't destroy the system, for $200 you can get yourself a machine that:

    • Plays games (hopefully, the Xbox will have better exclusive games than just Halo and Shenmue II).
    • Plays DVD movies.
    • Plugs into a TV (which every American has), monitor (which most people can get for cheap).
    • Runs Linux for network admin types (imagine a few of these suckers in your business - $200 for a Staroffice/web browsing/java running machine).
    • With one hardware base to deal with, it should be easy to develop driers for - a major thing for developers. In some way, the Xbox Linux system could help for quick development (much the way that Quake III first came out for the Mac systems, since hardware wise there was a set "known" value for hardwae).


    This won't be perfection or anything as silly as that, but I'm curious to see where it goes. Great work to the team.
    1. Re:Why this is a good thing by InnovativeCX · · Score: 1

      ...Not unlike my laptop ;)

    2. Re:Why this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't seen an Xbox. Believe me, there ain't no way someone's confusing that frankenstein with a laptop ;)

    3. Re:Why this is a good thing by neo8750 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Runs Linux for network admin types (imagine a few of these suckers in your business - $200 for a Staroffice/web browsing/java running machine).

      this plan works till your boss walks in and see you playing halo.

    4. Re:Why this is a good thing by el_benito · · Score: 1
      "With one hardware base to deal with, it should be easy to develop driers for"
      Whew! Dude, thank Gawd! I, for one, am so freakin sick and tired of dealing with wet PS2s!
      --
      http://liquidben.com - Aspiring to an 'under construction' gif
    5. Re:Why this is a good thing by inerte · · Score: 1

      But I believe MS loses money on Xbox sales. If people start to pay 200 for it and use it with other purposes, MS might raise the price.

    6. Re:Why this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was your laptop $200?

    7. Re:Why this is a good thing by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 2

      And just give the market to Sony? Sony, who at least has a Linux kit (granted, they make it just about as proprietary as possible, but it's the thought that counts, I guess) would laugh their asses off if Microsoft raised the price of the Xbox to make up for heavy linux based sales.

    8. Re:Why this is a good thing by dirkdidit · · Score: 0

      Whew! Dude, thank Gawd! I, for one, am so freakin sick and tired of dealing with wet PS2s!

      somebody mod this up!! that's the best laugh i've had today

    9. Re:Why this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is a Karma Whore. Nice Bullet list. Insightful my ass.

    10. Re:Why this is a good thing by X0ff · · Score: 1

      This is NOT the beginning of a low cost, easy to use system. This system is low cost only because Microsoft is losing money on each box sold. Once a serious trend develops they will accelerate the develpmont of the HomeStation and get rid of it.

    11. Re:Why this is a good thing by mad_cow · · Score: 1

      Plays games (hopefully, the Xbox will have better exclusive games than just Halo and Shenmue II).

      The xbox has, of late, had pretty weak titles. Just around the corner, though, there are a number of interesting candidates: that Star Wars RPG by Bioware, Panzer Dragoon, and Psychonauts all have a bit of my attention. The guys at Penny Arcade just had a little discussion about the Xbox and it's lineup of games.

      Plugs into a TV (which every American has), monitor (which most people can get for cheap).

      Plugging a computer into a TV doesn't really intrigue me. It's got crappy resolution and is generally not set up properly for you to do any real work with. I have one a Shuttle Spacewalker hooked up to the TV in the living room, and it's only really good for playing divx's on a screen larger than the monitor.

      Runs Linux for network admin types (imagine a few of these suckers in your business - $200 for a Staroffice/web browsing/java running machine).

      I think that, for the most part, getting Linux running on the xbox is just a novelty. It's right up there with running Linux on PS2 or Linux on the Dreamcast. Cute, but really pretty useless. The other thing that concerns me is the quality of the hardware itself. Microsoft's taking a hit on each and every unit that they sell, so it makes sense that they'd try to reduce their loss by putting lower-end components into the case. I think that it's probably quite good to play games on, but I question its reliability for anything more intensive. Especially in a business. Then again, the price is about right to try it out, and if it doesn't work, it's not much of a loss.
    12. Re:Why this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lead a sheltered life.

    13. Re:Why this is a good thing by zaffir · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shenmue II was released on the Dreamcast in Europe. You can either import it and use a boot disk (freely available at a number of sites, www.dcemulation.com being one of them), or download a pre-cracked version (although 4 CDs will prolly take you a long time on a p2p network).

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    14. Re:Why this is a good thing by elite+lamer · · Score: 1

      Just a bit of trivia - Shenmue II is not an Xbox exclusive. It's available for Dreamcast (PAL only).

      You can add a DVD-ROM drive to any PC for as little as $30. Doesn't a modchip for Xbox cost around the same, if not more?

      You can plug your PC into a TV or a monitor, too.

      If you've already paid for that monitor or TV, you can get a PC that runs Linux for $200.

      So basically, what you're saying is that for $200 you can get a computer that runs Linux, plays DVDs, and plugs into a TV or monitor...or you could pay the same amount get an Xbox, which is non-upgradable, and doesn't have all the standard ports that a PC has?

      --
      Oops!
    15. Re:Why this is a good thing by Pfhor · · Score: 2

      Well, what really gets me is that you can have a high quality AV system that has almost all the hackability of a PC, but without having to deal with various noise (both signal and auditory) issues that a cheap box you built yourself would have.

      I mean, have it be an mp3 / movie playback system for your nice highend AV setup. You got dolby 5.1, you could use divx's with AC3 support, the works. And it has lan.

    16. Re:Why this is a good thing by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Runs Linux for network admin types (imagine a few of these suckers in your business - $200 for a Staroffice/web browsing/java running machine).

      Call the sales rep from IBM and say "no". If he asks why, explain to him that $2000/seat for fully supported workstations is too much. We decided to use the guy with blue hair, a bolt through his nose, and a minivan full of cracked $200 game consoles.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    17. Re:Why this is a good thing by Boxcarwilli · · Score: 1

      Great, now they will have a monopoly on the hardware...........which is even worse their their current monopoly.

    18. Re:Why this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halo, at least, won't be exclusive for much longer.

      In the latest issue of Edge magazine there is a table of averages of released software *per platform*. In total, 28 platforms were averaged. X-Box ended up in the last place with an average of 5.something.

      Is this meaningful? Well, yes and no. It means there is a lot of mediocre software out right now, but the X-Box is a fairly new machine and all the new machines (Playstation 2, Game cube, etc.) end up pretty low in the table. Then again, those other machines have new, unknown architectures, whereas the X-Box (being just a PC) is already well-known to developers.

      Funnily, Nuon ends up in the first place. Then again, it just had one (pretty good) game ;-)

    19. Re:Why this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are using digital outputs, like digital coaxial or optical audio and Svideo, there are no various noise issues regardless of whether you use an Xbox or a cheap box you built your self.

      And the cheap box would be upgradeable.

    20. Re:Why this is a good thing by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      And I must say that it is well worth importing. Shenmue 2 EU was one of the best games that I have ever played. It was truely an epic.

    21. Re:Why this is a good thing by pmz · · Score: 2

      There's a reason why I think this is a Good Thing, and it goes beyond some stupid "Microsoft sucks, make them spend money!"

      I stopped thinking the X-Box was a good thing once I saw "Microsoft". It doesn't matter what functions or specifications the X-Box has, because Microsoft is one company I will never invite back into my home.

      Recommending the X-Box also means recommending: proprietary file formats, perverted standards, overwhelmingly aggressive business tactics, and Palladium. All good, right?

    22. Re:Why this is a good thing by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      --childish sig--

      Could you also warn us with --childish post-- so we can skip your posts, please?

    23. Re:Why this is a good thing by pmz · · Score: 1

      Could you also warn us with --childish post-- so we can skip your posts, please?

      No.

  20. driver bug by kirkb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm typing this into KMail using a USB keybaord

    Looks like the xbox USB keybaord driver still has a few bugs in it... :)

    --
    Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
    1. Re:driver bug by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

      I beat you by two minutes.

    2. Re:driver bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A WINNNAR IS YUO!

    3. Re:driver bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit, I knew adding all those stupid HTML tags to my post was foolish! Better luck next time, I guess.

      -kirkb

  21. Advantages? by extagboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there any real advantage to doing this (graphics maybe??) on an X-box as opposed to a real pc or is just something to do when youre bored?

    1. Re:Advantages? by rosewood · · Score: 2

      $200 is pretty fucking cheap for something like this ?

    2. Re:Advantages? by caferace · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I know I'll get modded down for this. Enjoy.

      The advantage to doing this is to fsck with Microsoft. The rest is just gravy. I do love the .png from sourceforge though. That is too cool.

    3. Re:Advantages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are all aware that Linux is the best operating system available. Exercises like this not only contribute to the ever growing Linux knowledge base, but also garner useful publicity. Linux keeps growing and the public calmors for more Linux projects and information. In the event that Microsoft raises a public stink, all the better for Linux. CNet, InfoWorld, et al will have a field day, and Linux will show up on more radars than ever. That's the way the world works.

    4. Re:Advantages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are all aware that Linux is the best operating system available

      After MacOS of course. :P

  22. Soldering required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    or just a DVD boot into Linux?

    can you read/write from the hard drive?

    1. Re:Soldering required? by gmplague · · Score: 1

      From the readme:
      Linux can also mount non-locked HDDs on the box IDE port. By
      default we do not mount any HDD. Although we have the code
      and keys to unlock the drive in software we decided not to
      issue it yet due to the trouble bugs would cause. It is
      believed that a UDMA drive of reasonably recent vintage is
      required for correct operation with the nVidia chipset
      currently.


      So in answer to your question - "sorta" but that should be a definite "yes" shortly.

      --
      __________________________________________
      Take comfort in your ignorance.
      Grandmaster Plague
    2. Re:Soldering required? by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      But you still need the modchip ?!

    3. Re:Soldering required? by warmcat · · Score: 2

      Yes, you need some kind of modchip / BIOS replacement in order to get any unsigned executable to run on the box, including Linux.

  23. Is there any point to this? by pubjames · · Score: 2


    I've never understood what all the fuss is about with Linux on the X-Box. Apart from being a fun hack, is there any point to this?

    1. Re:Is there any point to this? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      You can run lots of Linux software on it. Cheap webserver, fileserver. Run a few arcade game or computer emulators on it. Makes a cheap broadband web browsing box, sit in the living room with a TFT screen and the XBox and chill out...etc....

    2. Re:Is there any point to this? by J_DarkElf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure there is a point.

      An X-Box is basically a custom built PC, so if you run Linux on it, you get a cheap, quite powerful, near intell-compatible computer, with a powerful graphics card.

      That's why MS made the X-Box OS so limited, they don't want people to use it as a cheap PC -- it is being sold far under cost price, so they'll have to earn money on it by selling games.

      If you run Linux on it, and play free games instead, you are costing Redmond quite a lot of cash ;)

    3. Re:Is there any point to this? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the same point as fussing about running linux on a playstation, or on a dreamcast, or on my cellphone, or on a nintendo, or, or, or, or.

      why does there have to be more of a point than just people playing around and showing others who might be interested?

    4. Re:Is there any point to this? by lmfr · · Score: 1

      is there any point to this

      Yes, "it's a fun hack" :)

      Besides, they're breaking microsoft's security system. Err... one that gives more trouble than usual.

      Some will say "beowulf cluster", stack of xbox, xbox in the office, etc., but those forget that there are cheaper, faster, and better supported standard pcs around...

    5. Re:Is there any point to this? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      Besides, they're breaking microsoft's security system.

      which security system is that? firewall, encryption, authentication? help me out here?

    6. Re:Is there any point to this? by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've never understood what all the fuss is about with Linux on the X-Box. Apart from being a fun hack, is there any point to this?

      Yes, there's a point to it. These geeks are demonstrating the stupidity in crippling a computer with DRM, and they're deriding Microsofts attempts to make a so-called "secure platform". Microsoft has said that they want the future for PCs to include these crippling technologies. What they are doing is proving to MSFT customers and shareholders that the company is full of shit, and DRM can't be done (never mind whether or not it should be done).

      I don't know if that's their motivation or not, but that's the effect. Their motivation might just come from solving a difficult problem and learning something in the process - you should try it!

    7. Re:Is there any point to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There aren't enough of you fucking hippy fags to put a dent in Microsoft's XBOX operations. Get back in your parent's basement.

    8. Re:Is there any point to this? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      An X-Box is like a custom built PC?

      What's so custom about it?

    9. Re:Is there any point to this? by lmfr · · Score: 2, Informative
      The part of the system that stops you from running unsigned code, change the OS, use the hardware as you want...

      Different that other security measures, this one is intended on stopping the user, owner of the machine, to do with it as it pleases him.

      Anyway, google, and the paper.

    10. Re:Is there any point to this? by msaavedra · · Score: 1

      The XBox has hardware-based security to prevent running unauthorized code. Read here for an in-depth description of how the security was cracked.

      --
      "Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it."
      --Henry David Thoreau
    11. Re:Is there any point to this? by ferrocene · · Score: 1

      Why do people ask this EVERY SINGLE TIME someone gets linux to run on some hardware. Can't people just assume that this question is going to be asked? I predicted at least 2 people would "complain" about the "point of it" before I clicked on the link, and so far I'm on par.

      What's the point on getting linux to run on anything? Productivity? Games? Graphics? Pursuit of knowledge? I mean, that's why we have open source, right? So people can learn from others on all types of hardware and software. Free flow of information. My own theory is the point is in the journey, not the destination. But that's just me.

      --
      Most folk'll never lose a toe, and then again some folk'll...
    12. Re:Is there any point to this? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "why does there have to be more of a point than just people playing around and showing others who might be interested? "

      Because the content providers are already in a nasty tizzy over circumvention of protection devices? Hackers/Crackers already have a bad rep that's helping get shit like the DMCA passed. More of this kind of stuff without an obvious helpful reason is just going to make them spend more money on politicians.

      You really want MS to back the CTPBPTPBA?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:Is there any point to this? by jsdkl · · Score: 1

      A great wise person once said, "If you have to ask why, you don't understand."

      'Nuff said.

      Ryan

    14. Re:Is there any point to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "More of this kind of stuff without an obvious helpful reason is just going to make them spend more money on politicians. "

      Hello????

      The whole point is that *there is no obvious "helpful" reason*. No-one can bitch that it's being used to pirate anyone's intellectual property; it's merely one of the most routine activities in computer science, porting an operating system to a new hardware platform.

      This sort of action is ammunication *against* the DMCA etc and worth supporting for that reason even if you don't see point to it other than a fun technical exercise.

    15. Re:Is there any point to this? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "This sort of action is ammunication *against* the DMCA etc and worth supporting for that reason even if you don't see point to it other than a fun technical exercise. "

      It won't happen though, will it? Some dumbshit's going to port MAME over to the XBOX and show people how you can turn it into an arcade box. Trust me, the content peeps will find a way to twist it. "They're just using it to pirate ROMS!!!" and some dumb crap like that.

      Before you argue with me: Just because the hypothetical argument isn't rational doesn't mean they wouldn't try it. This is the same industry that said that Apple was promoting piracy.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    16. Re:Is there any point to this? by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

      for $200 I thought they where 733 celerons , 10 gig hd and 128 Meg of ram .... thats pretty cheap ... where can I get better?

    17. Re:Is there any point to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No fucking shit. If I ask "Why does the sun rise in the East and set in the West?" of course I don't fucking understand, otherwise I wouldn't be asking.

      -1 Anti-Insightful, everyone is stupider for having heard it. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.

    18. Re:Is there any point to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFWS

      The project Web site shows (a) the project is based in Germany where mod chips are legal (b) they emphasise that it is *not* for piracy and have a legal agreement to be signed by all members of the project to that effect (c) they quote chapter and verse from the DMCA to show where and how the project is allowed.

      Methinks they're on good legal ground.

      Mightn't make much difference in the US of course (and if I were one of the members of the team I'd be wary about gong there!), but it sounds great for those of us in the rest of the world.

    19. Re:Is there any point to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there isn't any point to this, then there wasn't any point in MS releasing the Xbox, either. Either the hardware is useful to someone, or it's not. You make the call.

    20. Re:Is there any point to this? by mobets · · Score: 1

      hmmm, they had Intel Alter a chip for them, nVidia alter a chip for them, figured out a fast and efficient way to have the video card and processor share the ram. It is very custom.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    21. Re:Is there any point to this? by npietraniec · · Score: 2

      No...

      If you have to ask, then you'll never understand.

      Saying that you're asking because you don't understand is a pretty blatently obvious statement.

    22. Re:Is there any point to this? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      Thats a custom computer for MS... when I think of custom PC though, I think of customized for the end user.

    23. Re:Is there any point to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude

      if I can't pay more for it, and it doesn't come in a color I can "pick"

      it's pointless.

    24. Re:Is there any point to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft loses over $100 per XBox so, if you're only using Linux you're getting a cheap PC/DVD player and costing MS money

  24. toaster-linux by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 1

    But wait, I can run Linux on my toaster, Look I opened a telnet session to my blender, ftp'd to my refigerator and I can finger my microwave - I am working on getting TUX Racer to run at 0.5 FPS - I'll post screen shots as soon as I do.

    1. Re:toaster-linux by dirkdidit · · Score: 2, Funny

      and I can finger my microwave

      That is undoubtedly the most disturbing thing I've ever heard in my life.

    2. Re:toaster-linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows only NetBSD will run on toasters :P
      How about something useful so i can run ntpdate on my damn vcr??

    3. Re:toaster-linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was probably the first time in the history of the English language that the phrase "and I can finger my microwave" was ever put into print.

  25. One Possible Use by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

    Not to slightly contradict my previous statement about building your own PC for the same price, but I do see one use: a networked audio appliance. The combination of the ethernet and digital sound output would integrate well into a home-theater setup. Good remote control and on-screen displays would round out the setup nicely. It would be much cheaper than Sonic Blue's solution.

    1. Re:One Possible Use by boopus · · Score: 2

      Well, with Sonic Blue's solution, you're paying for the software, the pre-hacked linux kernel, and the support. You pay through the nose for it, but you get a lot. You can plug it in and think of it as a music appliance, not a computer playing mp3's. Ask anyone who coughed up $1200 for an empeg (the central is designed by the same group) if they think it was worth the price...

      That being said, an xBox hacked to be a home audio server would be a nice toy and a great way for a geek to get extra value out of it when they already want it for games.

  26. Hold on a second.... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How do we know the screenshots aren't created with a PC connected to the TV? :)

    1. Re:Hold on a second.... by davidstrauss · · Score: 2, Funny

      How do we know you're not just a Microsoft employee posing as a /. user?

    2. Re:Hold on a second.... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      You don't but I assure you I'm not (and never will be). It was just a thought, development seems to of moved on quite rapidly from a small distro that didn't do a lot to one that is almost complete.

    3. Re:Hold on a second.... by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      development seems to of moved on quite rapidly from a small distro that didn't do a lot to one that is almost complete.

      The porting was quick because it's... not really porting. Internally, the Xbox is just a normal wintel PC, celeron CPU, NVidia graphics, ATA hard drive, etc. Once the kernel boots, and drivers exist for the graphics chipset, it's pretty trivial to throw everything else on.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    4. Re:Hold on a second.... by gmplague · · Score: 1

      Actually you do know it's not connected to the TV... If you watch the video, you see him pull out the monitor, and hook up the keyboard and video, and see the x-box logo, see him put the disc in. So it's pretty clear that it's the X-box.

      --
      __________________________________________
      Take comfort in your ignorance.
      Grandmaster Plague
    5. Re:Hold on a second.... by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1

      How do you know that wasn't a just to throw you off, and the monitor was really fed a signal wirelessly? Like those Amiga terminals.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    6. Re:Hold on a second.... by theCoder · · Score: 1

      Timmeh, in post 4185950 , pointed to this video file that shows the setup and booting of Linux on the X-box. It would be better if it showed them taking the x-box out of a sealed package first (i.e., no modifications), but this is still pretty good (and I don't know if it's possible without mods anyway).

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    7. Re:Hold on a second.... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      pointed to this video file

      Lovely. A video clip showing Linux installation that's a Windows avi so we can't (easily) watch it on a Linux box.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    8. Re:Hold on a second.... by damiam · · Score: 2

      Have you ever heard of mplayer? xine? xanim? avifile? xmms? Most or all of these come with any recent distrobution.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    9. Re:Hold on a second.... by kistel · · Score: 1

      Uhm. You know, once I saw a show of David Copperfield. He was floating around a scene, and a lot of cameras recorded it from every direction as he flew by.

      So it's pretty clear he _was_ flying.

    10. Re:Hold on a second.... by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      "posing as a /. user"

      hmmmm

    11. Re:Hold on a second.... by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      It's probably a DivX file. Besides, mplayer and Xine can play almost anything nowadays. If your Linux box has good video accelleration, it can be done with no load on your CPU. Plays back just as nicely (sometimes better) as Windows with most codecs.

  27. Go loss leader! by jmd! · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Go loss leader! I didn't really need another PC, but if me buying an xbox to use as a PC costs Microsoft money, then I guess I can find some use for it.

    1. Re:Go loss leader! by ryants · · Score: 2
      but if me buying an xbox to use as a PC costs Microsoft money
      Uhm... not buying the XBox would probably hurt them more, don't you think?

      I'll bet you're one of those kinds of people that sees "Save $100 off product Foo!" and will rush out and buy Foo, even though you don't need one, just to "save" the hundred bucks.

      --

      Ryan T. Sammartino
      "Ancora imparo"

    2. Re:Go loss leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. If it costs Microsoft $100 whenever they sell an Xbox, they are actually losing that money. All things being equal, it hurts them more if you buy it (but if you didn't need it, it costs you, too).

    3. Re:Go loss leader! by GreenPhreak · · Score: 2

      No, actually buying the system and not buying games costs Microsoft more money than if you were to not buy the Xbox at all.

      You see, Microsoft is selling the Xbox at about 150 dollars below the cost of manufacturing it. They make up that money by selling games at a profit price, but if you buy the Xbox and then don't buy their games, they have lost money. Thus, people buying Xboxes and then using them as Desktop systems with Linux ends up costing Microsoft in the long run.
      QED

      --
      I drink to prepare for a fight; tonight I'm very prepared. -Soda Popinksi
    4. Re:Go loss leader! by ryants · · Score: 1
      If it costs Microsoft $100 whenever they sell an Xbox, they are actually losing that money.
      And not buying it costs them:
      • the cost of manufacturing a unit.
      • the cost of storing unsold units.
      • market share/sales numbers that the MarketRoids can use (most important).
      That which is seen, and that which is unseen, as the old economics saw goes.
      --

      Ryan T. Sammartino
      "Ancora imparo"

    5. Re:Go loss leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I pay 200 so Microsoft loses 150? how is that going to work?

    6. Re:Go loss leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hello retard.
      I can only assume you've never read a slashdot xbox article before.
      I'm TIRED of seeing the same morons saying the same clueless things.

    7. Re:Go loss leader! by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      So I pay 200 so Microsoft loses 150? how is that going to work?

      Look at it this way. Let's say I own a candy making shop where I make cotton candy on sticks. Let's say that my cost to make cotton candy is $1.50 per unit including the cost of sugar, electricity to run the pot, colouring and the stick.

      I open my shop and sell you cotton candy on sticks for $1.00 each. I'm losing 50 cents on each sale, right? I paid $1.50 wholesale for something that I'm selling to you for $1.00 retail.

      How long is my store going to stay in business before I'm so far behind on my rent payments that the bailiffs lock my door? This is where business volume can work against you. If I am selling 10 items per day I will go broke more slowly than if I am selling 100 items per day. "Hey, my store was a huge success! People were rushing in steadily and purchasing the product!" But I went broke.

      See?

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    8. Re:Go loss leader! by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Heh. That's interesting math:

      Manufacturing cost = $350 (not sure if that's true, but we'll run with it just for giggles)

      MSRP = $200

      When an XBOX is sold, MS makes MSRP - a very small commission for the store it's sold at. (Stores make nearly no money on Game consoles.)

      So MS is out $150.

      When the item is out, MS is out $350.

      So, as near as I can tell, $350 > $150, therefore MS loses more money when an XBOX isn't sold.

      Now, your argument is that people should buy XBOXs and not buy games for them. (In other words, people should pay for nothing) You're assuming that when you sell that XBOX, nothing will be there to replace it. WRONG. MS will not only make another XBOX in it's place to sell, but it'll be cheaper. Manufacturing cost is based on the total money spent to make these units divided by how many are sold. It takes a lot of money to get the factory started and so one. Once that's done, it just keeps churning out consoles. As time goes buy, the price goes down. (Not including that CPUS, RAM, etc get cheaper over time...) Eventually, MS will sell these at a profit. (assuming Sony/Nintendo don't undercut them to death.)

      Now let's get back to the pscychology of buying a unit and not buying games with it: You're screwing yourself out of $200 that way. MS's systems sold # goes up, giving people more reason to buy one. They're going to buy it and play games for it. Meanwhile, you either have an expensive doorstop, or a shitty Linux machine. Woop-de-doo. 10 million XBOXes would have to be sold for MS to lose 1.5 bill. They have 40. Can you honestly tell me common sense wouldn't prevail with 10 million+ people involved?

      If you don't like MS, don't buy their products. 'Sticking it to them' is not likely to do anything but good for them.

      Frankly, I'm sick of all these "I hate MS" posts. If you get so zealous about attacking MS, not only will you never be taken seriously, but you'll also give them the ability to say "were just misunderstood." Pick your battles. Fight MS for making you buy Windows, don't fight MS for making a good game machine.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Go loss leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fight MS for making you buy Windows, don't fight MS for making a good game machine.

      What did they start making gamecubes or something? WHERE IS MY MICROSOFT POKEMON 2003?!!!!!

    10. Re:Go loss leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thouse are typical costs of doing business. Now what happens if they detect a surge of xbox sales now and figured they need to make more of them for the x-mas rush? The question is how to maximize the post christmas inventory while getting them to lose as possable before then.

    11. Re:Go loss leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your analagy is slightly wrong.
      You (as the sweet store owner) sell sticks, at $2 each, they cost you $3. But the stick on it's own is worthless (like a XBox with no games) so you also sell sweets to put on your stick (at $0.4, and they cost $0.2, making you $0.2). As you can see it will take 5 sales of sweets per-person to make a profit. But then if you have spend $2 on a sweet-stick, you will not just let it go to waist, and even if you only buy one sweet (go on try to not buy Halo), on advage more than five sweets per person are sold.
      Then you have the fact that the store owner can say "XXX sales of my sticks! My Sweets Sell More!" and so more people buy your sticks...

    12. Re:Go loss leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The catch is, for every Xbox sold it encourages them to make more.

      Although I won't get into this debate, since it is pointless.

      There is NOBODY here who bought the xbox without buying atleast 1 game.

    13. Re:Go loss leader! by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >So I pay 200 so Microsoft loses 150? how is that going to work?
      >
      >
      Xbox supporters aren't exactly the brightest bulbs around.....

    14. Re:Go loss leader! by caferace · · Score: 1
      Frankly, I'm sick of all these "I hate MS" posts. If you get so zealous about attacking MS, not only will you never be taken seriously, but you'll also give them the ability to say "were just misunderstood." Pick your battles. Fight MS for making you buy Windows, don't fight MS for making a good game machine.

      Whatever. I hate Microsoft with good reason. They totally screwed over a company I used to work for.

      Here is a wrench in your "math".

      Buy a Xbox with the sole intention of putting Linux or whatever on it.
      Microsoft uses that sale (amongst the aggregate total) to estimate the projected revenue from future game sales.
      Games sales disappoint Wall Street analysts, since the boxes weren't used for the purpose intended.
      Microsoft's stock price declines, the dominant market share is weakened, and they have to behave like a good corporate citizen.

      I kinda dig that scenario. Not like Xbox is going to precipitate this, but....

    15. Re:Go loss leader! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Microsoft's stock price declines, the dominant market share is weakened, and they have to behave like a good corporate citizen"

      Stock price and market share are not the same thing. Market share is how many people have XBOXes and how many people have GameCubes. Stock price is a measure of investor confidence. Since MS is so big, XBOX could be a flop and hardly rock their boat, stock-wise.

      "kinda dig that scenario. Not like Xbox is going to precipitate this, but.... "

      The only harm you'd do is to the game companies trying to sell games. Not cool. Not cool at all.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    16. Re:Go loss leader! by tealover · · Score: 1

      Whatever. I hate Microsoft with good reason. They totally screwed over a company I used to work for.

      If your mentality is indicative of the prevailing level of intelligence at your former company, I don't think Microsoft had to work very hard to screw them over.

      But you sit in your mom's basement and put the finishing pieces on your Takedown of Microsoft. I'm sure Patton got started in a similar fashion.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    17. Re:Go loss leader! by nathanh · · Score: 2
      So, as near as I can tell, $350 > $150, therefore MS loses more money when an XBOX isn't sold.

      This assumes that all the X-Box units have already been made and are stored in a warehouse somewhere.

      The more likely scenario is that Microsoft built a few 1000 extra units and builds more as stock is sold. So let's assume 1000 units are sitting unsold in a warehouse. That is $350,000 in stock. Nobody buying another X-Box therefore costs Microsoft $350,000. But if 3000 people buy an X-Box and Microsoft achieves a best case scenario of having no stock left then Microsoft loses $450,000.

      The 1000 units in stock number is a fictional guess, but the thought process illustrates that your logic is flawed.

    18. Re:Go loss leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were making 1000 at a time, then 3000 people would buy one AND MS would make another 1000 on top, so they should lose even more. Yay.

      Off-topic mini-rant: Why can't you write "thousand" where necessary to aid literacy?
      "MS built a few 1000" reads like "MS build a few one thousand". I had to stop and try to figure out whether you were supplying 1000 as an example, or trying to say "a few thousand".

    19. Re:Go loss leader! by caferace · · Score: 1
      But you sit in your mom's basement and put the finishing pieces on your Takedown of Microsoft. I'm sure Patton got started in a similar fashion.

      Oooh. Did you take Debate 101 in Junior College? I'm stung to the core.

      Mom doesn't have a basement at her new house, I'm nearly 40 and the best I own is a PS1. I find bugs in other peoples software. It's my job and I seem to be pretty good at it. Your point?

    20. Re:Go loss leader! by nathanh · · Score: 2
      Off-topic mini-rant: Why can't you write "thousand" where necessary to aid literacy? "MS built a few 1000" reads like "MS build a few one thousand".

      It seems I've been told this a 1000 times...

    21. Re:Go loss leader! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Oooh. Did you take Debate 101 in Junior College? I'm stung to the core.

      Mom doesn't have a basement at her new house, I'm nearly 40 and the best I own is a PS1. I find bugs in other peoples software. It's my job and I seem to be pretty good at it. Your point?


      If you're as good at debugging software as you are at debugging your arguments, you may want to look for another career.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    22. Re:Go loss leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, buying an Xbox does not cost MS money. The Xbox has already been manufactured. MS have already spent the money. Buying an Xbox makes MS money. Go figure.

      Better still buy a Dreamcast for $40 and build Linux for it.

    23. Re:Go loss leader! by caferace · · Score: 1
      Good lord. I wish I could mod myself down.

      Since you're apparently too much of a wuss to post with a email address, and your website consists of the brilliant text: "Under reconstruction" I guess my only retort available is here in public.

      Blow me, schoolb0y. You have no skills.

    24. Re:Go loss leader! by ianweeks · · Score: 1

      It takes a lot of money to get the factory started and so one. Once that's done, it just keeps churning out consoles. As time goes buy, the price goes down. (Not including that CPUS, RAM, etc get cheaper over time...) Eventually, MS will sell these at a profit. (assuming Sony/Nintendo don't undercut them to death.)

      Xbox CPUs are getting more expensive. They use Celeron 700s, which are already very old. Intel has to keep producing these CPUs especially for the Xbox. So Intel hardly has any economies of scale (small number of CPUs) and high opportunity costs (instead of Celeron 700s they could be making Pentium4s). Nvidia has the same problem.

    25. Re:Go loss leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand how it would really matter if you didn't buy one or not. They aren't going to make a billion if they aren't sellling. They are going to keep making them even if you don't buy games.

      Some might argue that it is a good way for MS to say to developers "We have sold X amount of X-Box units. Please develop for us.". It also would mean that they would have a lower ratio of systems to games if you ignored the games.

      Either way, I doubt that it really matters.

    26. Re:Go loss leader! by dennism · · Score: 2

      Now let's get back to the pscychology of buying a unit and not buying games with it: You're screwing yourself out of $200 that way.

      What? I don't get it -- I can think of a number of reasons to buy the X-Box without games -- and none of them involve "screwing over MS":

      DVD Playback

      DiVX Playback

      Emulators

      Homebrew Games

      I think that I can get $200 worth of use out of the X-Box without even buying one game. If the functionality provided by the X-Box meets your needs and is worth the $200, then go for it. The games you buy at Toys R Us and Wal-Mart aren't the only things that make it useful.

      --
      dennis
    27. Re:Go loss leader! by wheany · · Score: 1

      What huge surge?

      Who in here honestly thinks that people buying an Xbox just to run Linux on it would make any noticeable bump in the sales?

      Yeah, hahaha, I know, MS hasn't sold many Xboxes anyway, so a few slashbots buying one just to stick it to MS would double their sales. Hahaha! But seriously though, does anyone think they can really influence MS's sales figures?

    28. Re:Go loss leader! by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Analogy is flawed.

      A more accurate version is this:

      You've made thousands of sticks at a cost of $1.50, and they're sitting in your warehouse. If no one buys them, you've lost $1.50 per stick. But if people buy them, you're only losing $0.50 per stick.

      It's called unsold inventory.

    29. Re:Go loss leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow!... A submission containing the sentence "Frankly, I'm sick of all these "I hate MS" posts" at +5, insightful.

      You're right ofcourse, but: enjoy it while it lasts... you know you will end up at -1, troll, don't you?

    30. Re:Go loss leader! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Since you're apparently too much of a wuss to post with a email address, and your website consists of the brilliant text: "Under reconstruction" I guess my only retort available is here in public.

      Blow me, schoolb0y. You have no skills.


      Heh. Pathetic.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  28. Re:yay! by Inthewire · · Score: 1

    What did they loose? A broadside?

    There are significant between loose and lose
    I know, I should just let it go, but I'm curious: What is so difficult about spelling "lose" properly?
    The correct spelling even saves you one keystroke per occurrence.

    Ah, well, back to work.

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
  29. This is great! by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    Everytime someone buys one of these and put linux on it, it COSTS MS money...
    Lets drive them out of the console market an hurt them so much they dont come back.

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    1. Re:This is great! by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 0

      Lets drive them out of the console market an hurt them so much they dont come back.

      Urmm, why...?

      I mean, as far as console industry economics go, the more choices a consumer has, the lower the hardware prices and the wider selection of games. For less than $200 a console, there's no reason not to own them all, and be able to benefit from every game published.

    2. Re:This is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Lets drive them out of the console market an hurt them so much they dont come back."

      So basically you're a sad twat? Grow the fuck up, fanboy. More games companies equals more choice equals competitive pricing - which ultimately benefits the consumer, i.e. YOU.

    3. Re:This is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, it costs them even more money if you don't buy the xbox at all and let it sit on the shelves at the store.

      (tough concept to grasp, I know)

    4. Re:This is great! by NanoGator · · Score: 2
      Everytime someone buys one of these and put linux on it, it COSTS MS money...
      Lets drive them out of the console market an hurt them so much they dont come back.


      All you Anti-MS zealots have your fun picking on MS, but don't destroy the game market in the process.
      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:This is great! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      How the hell are folks going to destroy the game market by messing with MS?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    6. Re:This is great! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "How the hell are folks going to destroy the game market by messing with MS? "

      Buying a bunch of systems and not buying games? Can you honestly tell me that screwing game companies is the right away to approach an attack on MS?

      Think about it. That's why there was so much hooplah over the release of the PS2. It was $200 in the hole on a per unit basis as well. Sony needed 4 games per unit sold, and at best they got 1. The PS2's launch titles sucked so ppl watched DVD's on it instead.

      If that kind of shit continues, the game market will have the same breakdown it did in the Atari days. It doesn't take much for a game company to say "well just make another Quake killer, we can't risk doing something original."

      Call me nutso if you like, but if you hurt small game companies in this little spat, then you're no better than MS.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:This is great! by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 0
      >How the hell are folks going to destroy the game market by messing with MS?

      Because the introduction of the Xbox has ennervated the games industry, like it or not. Console prices have dropped, competition for exclusive game development and distribution is fierce, and the envelope for game quality is getting pushed monthly, on all sides. The industry itself is one of Wall Street's major stars this past year, but the big winner has been Joe Consumer.

      Didn't have to be MS, could have been anybody big and scary enough to slap the complacent Sony and Nintendo upside their noggins. The fact that it _is_ Ultimate Digital Boogeyman MS has only charged the festivities with more happy insanity. Won't get into the jingoistic US vs. Japan stuff, 'cause that's not my mindset, but you can see how that component could create a buzz in some circles as well...

      If "The Mighty MS" fails at this (and I really don't think they will, linux-installing slashdotters notwithstanding), what company will rise up to take it place? None (in their right mind) soon, thereby shrinking the industry, driving the prices up, and narrowing the selection of games. Great for Sony shareholders, not so for the game-playing public.

      If MS were wildly successful in this venture, it might even encourage other companies to get into the act, and create even more competition.

      ...and that's a good thing, or so SlashDot has told me...

    8. Re:This is great! by momobaxter · · Score: 0

      I don't play games...the game market can go to hell for all I care. This is a cheap box, one that I can use for any number of things including linux development. I can throw it in the corner and have a mp3 server... I don't buy things for games. There's no reason to.

      --
      "Full sources for linux currently runs to about 200kB compressed" --Linus Torvalds 31-Jan-1992
    9. Re:This is great! by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >All you Anti-MS zealots have your fun picking on MS, but don't destroy
      >the game market in the process.
      >
      >
      How would this destroy the *CONSOLE* game market? Sony and Nintendo is all that really matters. Pretty much nobody in the Console market cares about the crap released for the Xbox other than the lame PC gamer reviewers who mostly review/play FPS shooters. I got a real laugh after reading a PC gamer review of what I assume was the japanese version of Armored Core 3 for the PS2. He was whining because AC3 pretty much still uses the same controls as the older PS1/PS2 AC games which means AC3 doesn't use the Analog joysticks for movement of the head and walking around. His whine basically was "It makes playing the game too hard." What a total wuss.

    10. Re:This is great! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "the game market can go to hell for all I care. "

      Bad call. The success of the PC is largely in part due to the success of the game market.

      "This is a cheap box, one that I can use for any number of things including linux development. I can throw it in the corner and have a mp3 server... "

      If that's what you want to use it for, have fun. If you want to use it to 'screw MS', then you're not doing anybody any good.

      "I don't buy things for games. There's no reason to. "

      I'd correct that by saying "There's no reason for YOU to [buy things for games]." Which is a fair statement that I'd have no problem with.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:This is great! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "How would this destroy the *CONSOLE* game market?

      How does it help the market? "We'll push MS out so that only Sony and Nintendo will compete"? Yeah, thanks. Brilliant.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:This is great! by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >Because the introduction of the Xbox has ennervated the games
      >industry, like it or not.
      >
      >
      Yeah, because the Xbox turned out to be such a total flop in the Console Gaming Market. What you had was Microsoft telling PC game developers that they could port their PC Games (FPS shooters and other crap) and they would fly off the store shelves like hotcakes. Guess what? Didn't happen, and a lot of the morons who bet on the Xbox are now scared stiff.

    13. Re:This is great! by revoemag · · Score: 1

      actually MS begged the publishers not to make ports and for the most part they didn't.

    14. Re:This is great! by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >How does it help the market? "We'll push MS out so that only Sony and
      >Nintendo will compete"? Yeah, thanks. Brilliant.
      >
      >
      How does it *HURT* the market? Microsoft doesn't have anything to offer either the Sony or the Nintendo market.

    15. Re:This is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retail, Qty 1, hardware prices...

      $35 733 Celery
      $11 64MB Memory
      $17 Mobo
      $50 8MB vid
      $10 DVD drive
      $25 Junk plastic case
      ---------------
      Cost to build: $148

      Cost to buy Xbox at WalMart: $199.94

      Yea, tell me how they're losing money again? And, let me know what your theory on how Qty 10K+ pricing doesn't make that $148 guess outragously high.

    16. Re:This is great! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      okay, fine:

      a.) XBOX, being PC based, is easy to develop for. Therefore you can get started cheaper than with Nintendo or Sony.

      b.) More choices = more competition. That's always good.

      c.) Sony's arrogant as all get out. Trust me when I say: You'd rather have MS in the ring than Sony. Sony doesn't give a rat's ass about developers.

      d.) MS added a new twist to the console arena with the built in hard drive and ethernet port. What did Sony add to the PS2? Nothing of interest. The PS2 is a harder-to-program-for minor update to the PS1. They don't care to do anything but milk money where they can.

      e.) I don't think you're going to pay any attention to what I'm saying so I'm gonna stop here.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    17. Re:This is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, Microsoft has $40 billion in the bank. I don't think they're too worried about armchair Slashdot activists at the moment.

    18. Re:This is great! by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 1
      Because the introduction of the Xbox has ennervated the games industry, like it or not.

      Good try, but that's actually an antonym of the world you were *thinking* of, which is probably 'energised' (-ized for the Americans in the house).

      Enervated means "To deprive of nerve, force, strength, or courage; to render feeble or impotent; to make effeminate; to impair the moral powers of."

    19. Re:This is great! by momobaxter · · Score: 0

      The Pc is already here, it's not like it has to fight for anything. I own a mac too, it does well without the games. It got here because of games...if the games disappear, then oh well, the pc is still here.

      --
      "Full sources for linux currently runs to about 200kB compressed" --Linus Torvalds 31-Jan-1992
  30. Good good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that an Amiga monitor?

    1. Re:Good good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    2. Re:Good good by hpavc · · Score: 2, Informative

      cool thing about those monitors always was the dual RCA inputs ... and the toogle .. very nice design.

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    3. Re:Good good by woodja · · Score: 1

      It's the original Commodore 1084 monitor manufactured around 1987. My parents still have it and it works like a charm. See http://amiga.emugaming.com/monitors.html for a photo of one.

  31. Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2

    if we went and did that, now would it. Where's the fun in that?

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean M$ you hippie?

    2. Re:Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      "Childish" isn't the right word, but it's the first one that comes to mind.

    3. Re:Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the two most evil things in life are MS and MS, Multiple sclerosis and Microsoft. My mom and sister both have Multiple Sclerosis and Microsoft is of course microsoft.

      So to me calling Microsoft M$ is pointless

    4. Re:Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. What genius came up with this idea? Buy Microsoft products to hurt Microsoft! YEAH. RIGHT ON! Us Linux dude sure know how to stick it to the man. Never mind the fact that you are helping microsoft increase their market share (oops) and Microsoft can point to how many consoles they have sold and say, look, all of these people are just waiting for a great game from your company..

    5. Re:Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope your mom and sister both die soon. They would have lived a full life had you not been a communist.

    6. Re:Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to buy 1000 copies of Office XP. That'll teach those bastards at M$, err MickeySoft, err MacroShaft!

    7. Re:Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So to me calling Microsoft M$ is pointless

      Except that you can never confuse M$ with MS (multi-scler), can you? Sorry to bring a point to your pointless view.

    8. Re:Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and when very few of those games are sold, because everyone bought consoles to stick it to MS, noone will ever sign exclusive software deals with MS again.

      I don't give a crap if MS think their console is successful, it's the game developers (...developers, developers, developers, developers...) who count.

    9. Re:Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by Art+Deco · · Score: 1

      Early reports were that M$ lost money on every X-Box it sold. The old razor and blade game; sell the razor at a loss and mark up the blades a bunch and make your money there. If it is true that M$ looses money on every box it sells than buying them up to run Linux would hurt them. While it may be true that M$ lost money initially I don't believe that they would let this situation go on for long.

  32. Re:yay! by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are significant between loose [dictionary.com]

    significant what? significance is maybe what you had intended to type? perhaps, you wanted to type "There are significant differences..". perhaps it was just a human mistake. regardless, what you intended to type, and what appeared on the slashdot posting were two entirely diferent things causing significant disruption in the overall karma of the slashdot world.

    ah, well, back to browsing.

  33. better call your lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    xbox linux is ILLEGAL software. The developers have broken microsofts encryption to run their own ILLEGAL unlicenced software. This is a violation of the DMCA, and you could be SUED.

    1. Re:better call your lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xbox linux is ILLEGAL software. The developers have broken microsofts encryption to run their own ILLEGAL unlicenced software. This is a violation of the DMCA, and you could be SUED.

      If everybody thought the same way, you wouldn't have the keyboard to spew that virtual diarrhea all over my screen.

    2. Re:better call your lawyers by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 3, Informative

      xbox linux is ILLEGAL software. The developers have broken microsofts encryption to run their own ILLEGAL unlicenced software. This is a violation of the DMCA, and you could be SUED.

      Who gives a flying fuck anyway? BTW, Microsoft seems to be passive about 'hack the box' issues so far(from the net hack for Halo to Linux)...maybe they want xbox to get some more attention in the news?

      If Microsoft wanted to, they would have sent the Bill Gates Swat Team and stormed their ass down already.

    3. Re:better call your lawyers by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 1

      Microsoft should hire the guy's for actually trying to do something useful with an X-Box, I mean for God's sake how many freaking gaming consoles does the world need !!!

    4. Re:better call your lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, go ahead and hack that Xbox. Then you'll see a bunch of Arabs at Best Buy buying Xboxes like there's no tomorrow because they'll have building blocks for a new handy-dandy x86 nuke simulation farm.

      Anti-patriotic GNU hippie bastards... =)

    5. Re:better call your lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as far as I know DMCA is an american law...

    6. Re:better call your lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ILLEGAL unlicenced software

      Linux for XBOX unlicensed? More like GNU General Public License.

    7. Re:better call your lawyers by PyrotekNX · · Score: 1

      It's illegal to run unlicensed software made with MS' SDK. However Xbox linux does not use the SDK and is perfectly legal software.

  34. Screenshots! by Motor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hehe... I've been to enough computer shows to know that a box (be it Mac/PC/X-Box) sat next to a TV/monitor showing an interesting demo is just not something you can believe!

    --
    We all know that crap is king
    Give us dirty laundry!
    1. Re:Screenshots! by Timmeh · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's exactly what I thought too, I mean, other than that I don't think they'd do that kind of thing on the official page or anything. But, check out this video: http://xbox-linux.sourceforge.net/pic/xbox-linux2. avi, it's 1:34 minutes long, encoding in DivX 5/mp3 and it shows him setting it up and booting up. Putting the cords in and everything. Fairly Convincing.

    2. Re:Screenshots! by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      And screenshots are??

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    3. Re:Screenshots! by Cranky_92109 · · Score: 1

      The fact that the TV is actually an old Amiga monitor makes me a lil suspicious. Though that doesn't really mean anything since back in my college days, an Amiga 1084 on top of a VCR for a tuner was all the TV I had. :)

    4. Re:Screenshots! by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      it's 1:34 minutes long, encoding in DivX 5/mp3 and it shows him setting it up and booting up. Putting the cords in and everything. Fairly Convincing.

      Considering the amount of people that have been fooled by first person demos, I certain wouldn't believe anything that doesn't involve downloading the source code and setting up myself.

      But then again, I'm no offering $200K.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    5. Re:Screenshots! by rhysweatherley · · Score: 2

      So, get a chipped X-box, download the distribution, and try it yourself. Or wait for a zillion other /.'s to do it and report their experiences. With open source, checking for a fake is trivial.

    6. Re:Screenshots! by crivens · · Score: 1

      Me too. Even if he showed us a video of him doing it, it would be too easy for him to hide the cable running from his PC to the TV.

      It's a con I say!

    7. Re:Screenshots! by fzammett · · Score: 1

      BEST... SIG... EVER!

      --
      If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
    8. Re:Screenshots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the Pixelon debacle!

    9. Re:Screenshots! by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      it's 1:34 minutes long, encoding in DivX 5/mp3 and it shows him...

      So why is it that this, and just about all the other (ahem) DivX content has the same soundtrack? Must be an encoder thing...

    10. Re:Screenshots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who ever believed in lossless video compression over a phone line has got to be a moron.

    11. Re:Screenshots! by ces · · Score: 1

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  35. And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by unsinged+int · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Check this out.

    Some choice quotes:

    Where was the idea to xbox-linux born?
    To run unsiged code on the Xbox, wouldn't it be enough to write a boot loader, make someone with the SDK sign it and spread it on the internet?
    Is your project illegal? Doesn't forbid the DMCA all this?

    1. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by g4dget · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wonder whether your German is any better than their English.

    2. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by fo0bar · · Score: 1

      I thought that site's grammar was exceptionally good considering the project is run by germans (IE, english is not their first language).

    3. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by nulleffect · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it was translated from French with one of those nasty web translators.

    4. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by unsinged+int · · Score: 2

      Okay crucify me...I didn't know they were Germans. I would have cut them more slack and not posted that had I known.

    5. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by guzzloid · · Score: 1

      http://www.satirewire.com/news/0010/international. shtml

    6. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by warmcat · · Score: 2

      American, Austrian, German, English, and other places too.

    7. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      Shows what you know. DMCA is now a verb, as in "Didja hear Apple DMCAed some poor sap for getting iDVD to run on non-Apple drives?"

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
    8. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by vandy1 · · Score: 1

      Well, mine is, but hey, that's why I've been studying German 5 years...

      - Ich hasse diese Englische Dummkopfen!! ;-)

    9. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by SilverSun · · Score: 1

      FYI
      Ich hasse diese englischen Dummkoepfe!!

      --

      KdenLive/PIAVE - non-linear video editing

    10. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by kju · · Score: 1

      You are studying german for 5 years and you cannot write 'Ich hasse diese englischen Dummkoepfe!!' correctly? Ich glaube nicht, daß Du wirklich gut Deutsch kannst.

    11. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      No, if you're going to post on Slashdot, that needs to be:
      I wonder weather youre Germans any better then there English.
      There, that's fit to be printed in the Boston Globe! I mean, "Their, thats fit to printed in the Boston Globe!"

      >;)

      (Apparently, the editting in the Boston Globe has been going downhill, allowing things like "His wife and him were..." - it's all been downhill since the Boston Globe was bought by the New York Times. >;))

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    12. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by vandy1 · · Score: 1

      Tja, ich erinnere mich nicht immer an die pluralen von Korpeteilen... Wir duerfen beim HSC (das ist so wie das Abitur) naemlich ein Woertebuch benutzen. Michael

  36. Incredible. by cioxx · · Score: 1

    Finally I can start a web hosting business!

    Thanks linux guy.

  37. Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you need capitalization ?

  38. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is important to remember to capitalize certain words in your sentences, unless you aren't in America, in which case it is important to remember to capitalise certain words in your sentences.

  39. Monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What type of monitor is he using? Can you directly plug in any PC monitor into the back of an x-box or do you need an adapter? Will all usb keyboards/mice work?

    1. Re:Monitor by Istealmymusic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes and yes. Lik-Sang sells box VGA converters for a mere fifty bones. i> With the Xbox VGA Box, you can connect your Xbox console to a VGA monitor for a much brighter display. The adapter supports Auto switching between TV game or PC connection and automatic PAL/NTSC detection. It is compatible with PAL and NTSC consoles, 50/60hz.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  40. Way to go... by Badanov · · Score: 1

    Nice work so far. You all should be proud.

    --
    Dawn of the Dead
  41. Your camera is faulty by cca93014 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude, you need to take your camera back to whereever you bought it. There's some really fucking annoying penguin stuck to the lens that's being included in every shot.

    I can't believe you haven't noticed it.

    1. Re:Your camera is faulty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats the problem with a camera running Linux.

  42. tux racer by mgebbers · · Score: 4, Funny
    TuxRacer also runs (look at the new screenhots on the website), but only with one frame per second.


    so it's the same as a normal pc with a geforce then


    **boom boom**

    :D

  43. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the love of pete! important to whom? does it make a difference to the reader of the /. post? does the point get across any less?

  44. Not just for audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a video appliance too, you can have it decode mpeg2 and divx files, store them on your file server, and watch your divx movies from any tv in the house (provided you have RJ-45 jacks nearby). now that is the cool part.

    ChopSuey

  45. Wow, if he gets the $200,000 by thelinuxking · · Score: 2

    Then he would have enough money to buy a beowulf cluster consisting of 1001 of them (Including the own he currently owns ;-) )

    This expensive cluster would probably run a modified version of Tux Racer at a decent number of FPS.

    1. Re:Wow, if he gets the $200,000 by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 1

      "This expensive cluster would probably run a modified version of Tux Racer at a decent number of FPS."

      I doubt it... it would however contribute to Global warming.

    2. Re:Wow, if he gets the $200,000 by tunah · · Score: 2

      He can do this without the $200,000. With microsoft's security record, you don't need to own them, just to 0wN them ;)

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    3. Re:Wow, if he gets the $200,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe a new TV?

    4. Re:Wow, if he gets the $200,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The contest for that is if you can make the Xbox boot without haveing to physically alter the hardware. In this case, you still need to have a modchip in the Xbox for it to work. Modchip in the Xbox is a physical hardware change to the Xbox and therefore does NOT win the money. Still really cool, funny and ironic.

  46. xbox.com hosted on XboX by BeyondALL · · Score: 1

    Is http://www.xbox.com/ hosted on a XboX running Linux with Wine + IIS ???
    I'd love to see that ;-)

    --
    "If you keep an open mind people will throw a lot of garbage in it."
    1. Re:xbox.com hosted on XboX by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2


      I can't verify it's NOT on an X-Box, but, here's a bit of info that would help in the persuit of the truth.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  47. bit thin on details by g4dget · · Score: 2
    I couldn't find a lot of details on the web site. I suspect this involves changing the BIOS, right? Or can this be run simply by sticking a CD/DVD into the machine and powering it up?

    How far are we from a Linux distribution for the Xbox that can be booted from CD? I think that would be great for a web server farm (or a home web server).

    1. Re:bit thin on details by littleRedFriend · · Score: 1

      You could click the hyperlinks on their site.

      Task 1: Replacement BIOS

      Due tue the work of serveral people, we can boot Linux through a replacement ROM. The kernel and the initial RAM disk reside in the ROM. The Xbox hardware is initialized, but video output does not work yet.

      --
      IANAL, but imagine a beowulf cluster of in Soviet Russia all your belong are base to us welcoming the new SCO overlords.
    2. Re:bit thin on details by g4dget · · Score: 2

      Well, the video hardware clearly is working (though perhaps unaccelerated), since something is being displayed, so that paragraph is out of date. The question is: what point are they at now?

    3. Re:bit thin on details by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      'minor modifications' in my mind quite easily converts to 'get a modchip'. unfortunately xbox modchips aren't yet dirt cheap enough to justify buying the 250$(here) machine. for ~330-350$ you can get a bit of pc hardware too.. and as far as it comes at just pure gaming platform my already outdated pc has kicked it's arse all the time it has been on market.

      i'm wanting one as heart of mame cabinet though.. ;)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:bit thin on details by Troed · · Score: 1

      You can get modchips for $20 if you're good at soldering yourself. If you want one of the better ones, professionally installed, you're looking at ~$80

  48. Suitable as a PVR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How good of a Linux PVR would this make?

    1. Re:Suitable as a PVR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you can't fit a pci-card into it you need an external box for video input. Are the external usb boxes any good? If so, it should do quite well.

  49. RE: DRM Can't be done by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 5, Interesting
    While the 1st-gen DRM schemes can be broken, what happens when better integration prevents you from being able to "chip" a machine? What happens if the cost of the chip (and installation) keep going up?

    I think this is more of a lesson to MSFT about what precautions you need to make for a DRM box to really work!

  50. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who's pete?

  51. What about heat? Power? Space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The power consumption and heat would kill your server farm. A typical 1U rackmount box takes 1/10th the power and generates 1/10th the heat as an XBox. Over the long haul (12 months) what you save in upfront cost you lose in electrical and cooling bills - nevermind the cost to lease more floor space for the larger XBox boxes.

    1. Re:What about heat? Power? Space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm....your analysis is insightful. I was thinking about the web hosting business too.

  52. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love him like a brother

  53. It's all evoultion. by jabbadeznuts · · Score: 1

    God creates man... Man creates computer... Gates creates microsoft.... microsoft creates most sucessfull OS on the market... DOJ distroies microsoft... Linux inherits the earth.

    It's even true on a Microsoft piece of hardware. How 'bout them apples Gates?

    1. Re:It's all evoultion. by selan · · Score: 2

      And it could even work without the DOJ step. Linux inherits the earth because Linux is just better :).

    2. Re:It's all evoultion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed the step where the world is destroyed and all sane users of Microsoft Windows(R) were obliderated, leaving only Linux users (600-lb men who sit in IRC all day and play games like "Move the red dot to the right", and "Bill Gates is a fag, LOL!").

    3. Re:It's all evoultion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is working without the DOJ step! DOJ didn't do anything serious to MS, let alone "destroy" them.

  54. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell are you talking about? That sentence doesn't even make sense, it contradicts itself.

  55. A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on Xbox by neverkevin · · Score: 2, Informative

    To all those people who think buying an Xbox and running Linux is good because it causes Microsoft to loose money, your better off not buying an Xbox. Microsoft has already taken a loss on those nice shiny new Xboxes that you see in the stores. By buying them you are helping Microsoft recoup $200. If you don't buy the Xbox then Microsoft is out an additional $200.

    And if you want to keep Microsoft out of the console market your better off buying a Playstation 2 and some games. Building up Sony's market share is more likely to keep Microsoft from making an Xbox2 then Linux Xbox. Of course , Sony's business practices aren't much better then Microsoft, but that is going way off topic.

  56. xmame by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What we really need to get running on this is xmame. Nearly 3500 arcade games on your living room television set!

    Now there's $200 worth of entertainment!

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    1. Re:xmame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mame has already been ported to the xbox, it runs a lot of the games.
      Unfortunatly the 64Mb Memory is a limitation that causes a lot of newer games to fail to run.

    2. Re:xmame by tunah · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    3. Re:xmame by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Not done.

      xbox-mame uses a pirated copy of the xbox dev kit, copyrighted by Microsoft. That's why MS could and did shut 'em down.

      This, though, should allow us to get "real" xmame going in it with no need for MS's dev kit. Then MS will be unable to shut that down and all they could do is fume silently while the rest of us are going "WOCCA WOCCA WOCCA WOCCA GULP!" (Hey, Bill did say that Linux was PacMan so heck - if you've got it flaunt it! *tee hee*)

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    4. Re:xmame by Rubbersoul · · Score: 2

      All the time on /. we see people that do not read the article, and yes some of us get mad, and some just laugh. This guy though has gone to a new low and not even read the article that he posted. Had he read the article that he linked to he would have seen that is clearly says it is no longer hosted because it was not legal ... o well so goes Slashdot :)

      (Sorry had to do it)

      --
      man .sig
      No manual entry for .sig.
    5. Re:xmame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I've been running mame on my xbob for two weeks... ;-)

  57. Suck it down .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft Biznatches!!! Ahahahahahha oh the fucking humiliation. That stupid Monkey prancing around the stage is gonna be eating his shit. 'I love this company' my fuckin arse. hehehehe.

  58. In the olden days.. by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... we used to buy game machines to play games, not turn them into half-assed computers.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:In the olden days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now, thanks to this project, the XBox can be used to play Tux Racer and many other games that it couldn't play a month ago. A half-assed game machine has been turned into a three-quarter-assed game machine.

    2. Re:In the olden days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now, thanks to this project, the XBox can be used to play Tux Racer and many other games that it couldn't play a month ago. A half-assed game machine has been turned into a three-quarter-assed game machine.

      No, being able to play Tux Racer is like being able to play Fusion Frenzy. In other words: Are you on fucking crack? You think that being able to play Tux Racer on an XBox is a plus????.

      Put down the hashish and move away slowly -- it has rotted your brain.

    3. Re:In the olden days.. by beruche · · Score: 1

      ...Well, there's the Intellivision computer addon (the ECS) on my bookcase at the moment. I love it to pieces, but if I even called it half-assed, I'd be overestimating it. Then there was the Aquarius, the Coleco Adam... But they're fun at least!

    4. Re:In the olden days.. by gozar · · Score: 1
      ... we used to buy game machines to play games, not turn them into half-assed computers.

      No, in the olden days we turned computers into very capable game machines! I know I played more games on my Atari 800XL vs. my Atari 2600.

      --
      What, me worry?
    5. Re:In the olden days.. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Hey!! I had an 800XL too!

      I miss that little computer. :( *Sniff*

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  59. It's a small step... by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 1

    ...for Linux but big crash for Pd ;o) (I think MS is testing some basic components here - running signed code only, special BIOS etc. etc.)

    1. Re:It's a small step... by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      I agree. The XBox is a perfect testbed for that project whose name shall not be spoken.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  60. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He spelled capitalize the American way the first time, and the British way the second time.

  61. Can you make it run Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that might be a more interesting feat.

  62. Re:Fuck September 11th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, GO back TO GBS

    P.S. Xbox is Huge

  63. Yawn... by Jerf · · Score: 2

    You know, people have been saying this since at least the Intellivision. Try #1 Try #2 (And something for the 2600 is niggling at my brain... there might have been something for that, too.)

    After 20+ years of this line... I'll believe it when I see it. Not one second sooner. And with Microsoft fighting this tooth and nail... frankly, the Dreamcast had a much better shot here (what with most or all of them able to run custom CD-ROMs with no modifications to the unit), and it didn't happen either.

  64. Re:yay! by perlyking · · Score: 2

    That's just rediculous!

    --
    no sig.
  65. CD32 runs Amiga OS! by incunabulum · · Score: 1

    whoop-dee-freakin'-doo!

    --
    Why does this sig rock so hard?
  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. It was $0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was free. And I only had to stab one stupid honky for it.

  68. Re:Fuck September 11th by phatman808 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh look, it's Target's fashion designer!

    --


    --
    Hwa!
  69. Re:yay! by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

    I believe the post was written in Shakespearian English, which had no fixed spelling. Often lose and loose were used as a sort of double-meaning. See page xxxv of the introduction to The Everyman Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice." Do you see how irritating off-topic references are?

  70. Hello moron by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    You're an idiot. Pure and simple.

    If you DO buy an X-Box even without buying any games you are still giving MS $200.

    If you do NOT buy an X-Box, MS gets NOTHING from you. That costs them more than simply buying the X-Box and then not buying any games.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  71. C= Lives! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    Check out screenshots here.

    The monitor looks a lot like a Commodore 1902A. I think they're just faking us out with some Commodore-64 graphics!

  72. James Bond is convincing too. by sapped · · Score: 1

    Oi, just because it is a video doesn't mean that it can be believed. You can rent a James Bond movie at Blockbuster where it actually looks as if he can singehandedly save the world - without getting his tie out of place!

    With a little bit of video editing experience I could put together a video showing you where I just put together some code and voila - there is a new OS on the screen of my PC!

    However, all the cynicism aside - I doubt these guys would do that as it would be a fair bit of effort and they would be nailed fairly soon.

    --

    Employing incompetence: $35/h
    Fixing the resulting mistakes: $1000's
    Employing me: Priceless

  73. At last! A way to fairly compare PS2 and XBOX by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    The means is upon us at last to fairly compare the power of the two systems - the ultimate benchmark, Tux Racer!! Can the PS2 Linux system beat 1 FPS?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  74. Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by kajoob · · Score: 5, Funny

    at this rate, we'll only have to buy up a shade over 26 million of these puppies to eat up Microsoft's $4 billion cash reserve. The Empire is about to fall!

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    1. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by msevior · · Score: 1

      Interesting! That 26 million is about the difference between the number PS2's and Xbox's sold. However has 40 billion in reserve so they're prepared to lose 10% of that to get in the game with Sony.

    2. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by Quixote · · Score: 2
      Microsoft's $4 billion cash reserve.

      Sorry, MSFT's cash reserves were $5,116,000,000 as of 03/31/02. But, keeping cash reserves around is like keeping money in your mattress; they have invested most of it. If you count that too, their cash on hand is actually close to $40 Billion. So, you'll have to buy 260 million XBoxes, or, about 1 for every living human in the USA.

    3. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by gotr00t · · Score: 1

      Well, don't forget that Sony is a major conglomerate corperation with its hands in the pockets of the gaming industry, the consumer electronics industry, the music industry, the movie making industry, the solid state storage industry, need I go on? They are sure to have huge cash reserves to keep their PS line up and on the go against Xbox while all M$ makes is cruddy software and overpriced computer perhiperals.

    4. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      Not funny.

      The money is lost no matter what, by buying 26 million machines MS would have extra 5200 millions extra of cash...(assuming 1Xbox=200US$).

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    5. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by randomErr · · Score: 2

      Aren't you assuming someone who buys an XBox doesn't buy any licenced games or controllers?

      I'm sure someone will buy a game or two like Toe Jam and Earl.

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    6. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by alexpage · · Score: 1

      26 million Xboxen running Linux? Wow, imagine a Beowulf cluster of those!

  75. Obviously not a REAL geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *MY* Xbox runs tux racer at 2 frames per second, because I was l33t and overclocked it.

    Hah, all you suckers running Microsoft dictated specs! I laugh at you!

  76. I apologize in advance for the following post by sheepab · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Can you imagine a beowulf clust...er...nevermind.

  77. You're an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you DON'T buy an X-Box it costs them $200, doesn't it? $200 > $150 moron.

  78. I want one by psicE · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People have said this in other forms, but no one's summed it up so far.

    When it comes down to it, why do most people use Windows? Not because it's simple or Linux is complex - most computer users couldn't install or manage Windows configurations, so the added complexity of Linux wouldn't make much of a difference if the defaults (a la Mandrake) were any good. Not because it's more familiar (Start Panel, anyone?), or because it runs their productivity apps (most people can be set up with OpenOffice and not notice a difference).

    People use Windows because it's got the games. As commentators have said time and time again, the computer industry is driven by gamers. No one buys a Pentium 4 2GHz computer with a GeForce 4 Ti because they want to run Office, eh? Geeks resort to dual-booting, Linux for most tasks and Windows for games, while most users simply use what works best - Windows for everything.

    Now, with Xbox, there's an opportunity. Games, by their very nature, defy multitasking. When you're playing a game, you're not doing anything else, period, and you expect real-time performance from your computer. No file/print serving in the background, no preemptive multitasking meaning that your game is only running half as fast as it could. The computer should be doing nothing else but running a game. When you put a game into a console, it loads up that game, isn't running anything else in the background, and thus can (theoretically) give you better performance than any desktop with a full-blown OS can.

    So, suppose you had an Xbox with Linux installed. A user decides they want to type a document, or surf the web; they boot up Linux, and can open Moz or OO. Then, they decide they want to use a game. They shut down Linux, put the game CD/DVD in the Xbox, and load it up.

    Essentially, users have the benefits of a dual-boot situation without the downsides. Games are fully integrated, having every piece of software you need to run them built-in to the disc; the fact that it uses DirectX behind the scenes is irrelevant. And when you're not gaming, you load up Linux, which requires almost no configuration because it's for a standard PC configuration; the Xbox, in fact, may soon be the most ubiquitous PC configuration (plurality) anywhere.

    Users are happy because they get a $200 computer that they can use equally well with a TV, HDTV, or computer monitor; and due to its compact nature, could easily be transported from room to room if need be. Microsoft is happy because people are buying Xboxes, which means they buy games; so MS still ends up making a profit, because most people who buy the Xbox are going to get at least one game (which puts MS almost at break-even).

    1. Re:I want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assert:
      When you're playing a game, you're not doing anything else, period, and you expect real-time performance from your computer. No file/print serving in the background, no preemptive multitasking meaning that your game is only running half as fast as it could. The computer should be doing nothing else but running a game.

      I retort:
      BULL!

      Granted, I'm a "light" gamer. I play Q3 (alliance) - I don't need more than that. While playing, I'm listening to some classical music and listening to todays headlines being read to me by my box. If I hear something interesting - pause - grab the story, start it reading - unpause - frag!

      I keep everything running. I have USBOverdrive (kick ass for games - universal pad/mouse/stick driver with hella options), sshd, natd, etc. going. Besides all the "normal" background stuff I have a browser open (reading), iTunes(music) and you can't forget 'bout the Finder and Dock either - aside from anything else I happen to have open (often; Mail, Address Book, Project Builder, TextEdit, Preview..pick 2).

      Machine: Flat Panel iMac (15" - sadly 17" came out a bit after I got my box), 800Mhz/256MB ram/GeForce2MX/ DVD/CD burner..and...OSX 10.2!

      FPS? 50+. I (normal people) don't need more than that.
      That multitasking is a life saver. Quartz Extreme kicks ass. The development environment is the best *ever* and *free* to boot....

    2. Re:I want one by psicE · · Score: 2

      I have to compliment you - this is one of the rare AC posts that is actually good enough for me to reply to. Wow.

      You're absolutely right - you're a light gamer. The average person wouldn't dare pause their game to read a story; and chances are, they'd have a standalone sound system, with a high-quality receiver and speaker set. Even you, when you're playing a game, aren't really doing anything else; the fact that you have a large number of applications open in the background doesn't distract from the point that, while you're playing, your computer might as well be in hibernation, except for your music (covered) and your headlines.

      As for frame rates; remember, you've got an LCD. (I've got 5. :D) LCDs have the wonderful attribute that they don't need to be constantly refreshed to keep their image. Therefore, refresh rates have nothing to do with flicker, and everything to do with blur. If you're playing a visually-intensive FPS, and you're getting 50 FPS on an LCD, there will be a barely-noticeable blur on the screen at all times, and that's it. 75 FPS is ideal, because the human eye is capable of seeing the equivalent of little more than 72 FPS, but it's much less of an issue for LCD-type displays than for others.

      Essentially, you're in a unique situation. The average gamer and PC user is nothing like you. They barely multitask at all, let alone when they're gaming. They don't develop, of course. They just want to type their docs, read their email, play their games, and be done. For geeks like you and I, we have real computers, high-end PCs and Macs. For most users, though, an Xbox will be more than adequate.

    3. Re:I want one by TheClarkey · · Score: 1

      Very very insightful. Your thoughts do bring back to my mind the Amstrad Megadrive. This was a bit of a flop, mainly because well most prefered the snes to the megadrive.

      The applications for linux on a console are also pretty well documented for developing countries. I'm sure someone (most likely either MS, Sony or Nintendo) will see this very good way to drive up sales. "Much more than a console". The smart money must be on Sony or Nintendo packing Linux into future systems or MS chucking on some version of windows.

      One problem with relying on TV sets is that you can be restricted to crappy resolution rates if you have a crap tv.

    4. Re:I want one by wsapplegate · · Score: 1

      You just forget one (very little) problem: The XBox has to be chipped to run Linux or anything else than Microsoft-blessed code. That means only knowledgeable people (read geeks ) will do that. The only others who cash out to chip their box are (1) people who want to play imported games (not a lot of people, and probably not interested in using their console as a computer) and (2) warez d00dz, who probably would boot it up just to be l33t but then put it in a drawer...

      Oh, and BTW, you need a storage space for your documents. The XBox HDD uses FATX. Does this filesystem possess all the features you would need in an Unix OS (permissions, for example)? And how do you install new software on your machine (like that personal accounting package you just saw on SourceForge and that's not included in your distro)? Sorry to say that, but for now, the XBox isn't a menace to the PC hegemony, just yet another costly geek gadget...

      [ Disclaimer: This post written in b0rkenEnglish. We axxept no reklamations on the bade gramar. Thank you. ]

      --
      Xenu brings order!
    5. Re:I want one by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2
      The XBox has to be chipped to run Linux or anything else than Microsoft-blessed code.

      Right now - yes. Are you sure it'll be the same way in a week from now?

      Oh, and BTW, you need a storage space for your documents. The XBox HDD uses FATX. Does this filesystem possess all the features you would need in an Unix OS (permissions, for example)? And how do you install new software on your machine (like that personal accounting package you just saw on SourceForge and that's not included in your distro)?

      What's to prevent them from making a fs-interface?
      And who cares about permissions? It's a single-user environment, not a fully fledged PC.

      Besides you said it your self - only geeks will use this, and only geeks looks for stuff at Sourceforge. The rest of the populace settles for what comes with their PC.
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    6. Re:I want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue isn't that Linux can't run the games as well though. It is that the developers aren't concentrating on it since the market is so small (though it is there). I play games on my Linux box, and the OpenGL performance is better than it was in Windows. Heck... I just bought Space Tripper from http://www.pompom.org.uk/ . RTCW is a good diversion too.

      Frankly, in its current state, you could do quite a bit more with it for gaming than with Windows. Having a completely open, well documented OS makes it really easy to get the most out of code. The closed, multi-channel audio (Dolby) stuff is a problem in Linux right now, though. Even though you can get rear speaker support in games, it doesn't seem that most commercial developers are taking advantage of this in their Linux ports.

      But honestly, there are many people with high end video cards in Linux. nVidia, Matrox, ATi, and PowerVR have drivers on the platform (ATi's support is kinda iffy though). It is a very capable gaming platform. It just doesn't have support from most developers... Yet. As the Linux desktop market grows, more games will show up. I'm ready to buy the games. Though there aren't as many Linux users as there are Windows users, I believe that many Linux gamers are willing to pay for those ports. That is more than I can say for a lot of Windows users that I know, who pirate almost *all* of their software.

    7. Re:I want one by psicE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft's a big software company. Nevertheless, do you know where most of their profits come from? 40% are from Office, its biggest seller.

      Microsoft is fast realizing that a non-subscription-based Windows cannot be expected to be a moneymaker for long; people are just too prone to pirate. The idea very well may occur to them to port Office to Linux, because they know full well that they'd gain more profits from additional sales of Office than they'd lose from sales of Windows. And once MS is offering products from Linux, why wouldn't they at least make it possible (if not any easier) to install Linux on the Xbox?

      Knowing MS, they'd be much more likely to install a version of CE on the hard drive, which would allow people to run Microsoft-certified apps. But I can't think of a good reason why Microsoft wouldn't allow people to run Linux on the box, if it meant that MS would have more system sales, and thus more game sales (and more licensing fees from game developers).

      As for the other minor problems you mention: [a] The doctrine of first sale says that Microsoft can stop no person from buying a $200 Xbox, putting in a $40 mod-chip, installing Linux, and selling it for $300 plus shipping. MS may not like it, but users would; they could get a full-featured computer that ran all Xbox games for only $300, which is as much as some people paid for the Xbox as it is. [b] The filesystem doesn't need any special features. The Xbox by its nature isn't going to be used as a server, so in effect it's single-user; and there are no other filesystem features you need to download software off SourceForge (arguably we need a more standardized package format, but that has nothing to do with filesystems).

  79. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, so it's all the fault of the liberals...

    No, I said Bill Clinton specifically.

    Funny how none of those commie European countries got attacked! (Let alone those soft Canadians, suspect Aussies like me and traitorous New Zealanders). By the standards of the rest of the world even Clinton was well and truly to the Right.

    Probably because the Muslims already found a better way to conqueror you Europeans types. It's called outbreeding. While you're busy not having children and not working, the Muslims are busy immigrating in record numbers to take up the slack. In 500 years at current rates, Europe will be all Muslim. Something to think about.

    There's one reason for September 11 and one only: US foreign policy in the Middle East. It's not about democracy, it's not about wealth. No other developed country has been attacked or looks likely to be.

    There is no excuse for the slaughter of innocent civilans. Amazing that you can think differently.

    Americans like you, with your head stuck several meters (sorry, feet; that's right, you can't even organise yourselves to use a standard weights and measures system) are the reason your nation has become so totally loathed worldwide. Simplistic spoilt brat, retard, militarist, military service dodger and ex-coke user Bush is a wet dream come true for people like you.

    The Imperial system is actually standardized. There are set conversions from metric to imperial. Besides, it's only civilians here that use the imperial system; government, companies, and academia converted ages ago.

    Also, let's see. American National Guard is part of our military. Clinton ran to Canada and later England, at least Bush did his tour. As to the rest, whatever. Prove it.

    We're loathed because we're successful. Same with the Isrealis. What have you Austrailians done recently? Mick Dundee movies? Fosters?

    Problem is that no matter how many troops Bush sends into the Middle East there'll be more September 11s to come as long as the US (a) continues to support corrupt puppet governments in the area (b) outrageously favours Israel (c) conducts foreign policy in the area with all the subtlety of a rhino that's just had its balls cut off.

    So we're just supposed to let the Isrealis get slaughtered, like you pussy European types do. Fuck you. They have the right not to get blown up while eating lunch too you know.

    What puppet state are we supporting in the region? The only one that even comes close is Saudi Arabia, and I'd dare say that they're next on the list.

    3,000 people die as a result of box cutters. Response - ballistic missle defence. If it weren't so tragic I'd be laughing myself sick...

    You're lack of insight makes me cry. The missile defense has nothing to do with fighting terrorists per se, but is a method of protecting North America (including those sissy Canadians :-) from the occasional rogue missile from unfriendly nation states. Bush laid out this plan far in advance of 9/11.

  80. MOD UP PARENT +5 HI-LARIOUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    OMFG!!! It's funny 'cause Window$ suxs!!! HA HA HA!!!

  81. Re: There's no reason to... by lowe0 · · Score: 1

    Tell that to everyone who plays games.

    Mine plays a fantastic game of Halo. My friends love to come in, grab some couch and a controller, and blow off some steam. It's called entertainment, and socialization, and fun. You know, fun? What you see everyone else having?

  82. (OT) No contradiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That contradicts your previous statement, you fucking dumbass. You said "Here in Europe", yet here you claim to be in the Czech republic?

    No contradiction. Czechy is on the continent of Europe but is not part of the European Union.

    1. Re:(OT) No contradiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHB English T
      HTHHANDKTHXBYE

  83. Re:A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on X by The+Real+Chrisjc · · Score: 1

    Such a shame the psx2 is pants in comparison to the xbox eh?

  84. Job At Micro$oft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Around the time the X-Box came out, didn't some bozo at MS say that if someone were to get LINUX to run on it, there would be a job waiting for them?

    1. Re:Job At Micro$oft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Around the time the X-Box came out, didn't some bozo at MS say that if someone were to get LINUX to run on it, there would be a job waiting for them?

      You mean for the M$ bozo? Like, at McDonald's, flipping burgers? :-)

    2. Re:Job At Micro$oft? by egreB · · Score: 1

      I remember something like that as well. But anyone who can get Linux to run on XBox most certainly does not want to work at Microsoft..

    3. Re:Job At Micro$oft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah... but isn't that why they are so confident in saying that?

  85. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by just+another+cynic · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    We're loathed because we're successful. Same with the Isrealis. What have you Austrailians done recently? Mick Dundee movies? Fosters?

    No, you're loathed for being egotistical and trying to run the rest of the planet in hypocritical fasion.

    What has .au done recently? East Timor. Where the fuck was the rest of the world then?

    The Imperial system is actually standardized. There are set conversions from metric to imperial. Besides, it's only civilians here that use the imperial system; government, companies, and academia converted ages ago.

    Try visiting a decent country sometime where everyone uses the same measurement....

    So we're just supposed to let the Isrealis get slaughtered, like you pussy European types do. Fuck you. They have the right not to get blown up while eating lunch too you know.

    Well considering that you idiots put them there in the first place and completely destroyed the balance of power in that area....

  86. Re:Better $200 PC than Xbox by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1

    Walmart sells $200 PCs now. These would make a better PC than an Xbox.

    --

    Religion is the main cause of atheism.

  87. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you're loathed for being egotistical and trying to run the rest of the planet in hypocritical fasion.

    Sigh. Whatever. Trying to run the world... yet not expanding our borders in how long now? 50 years? Try again.

    And if hypocritical means having the guts to stand up for what you believe in, and doing what's right, then fine. We're hypocrites. Better that than a bunch of pussies.

    What has .au done recently? East Timor. Where the fuck was the rest of the world then?

    Busy doing other things, since it's irrelavant.

    Try visiting a decent country sometime where everyone uses the same measurement....

    And see what exactly? What was your point here? Did you even have one?

    Well considering that you idiots put them there in the first place and completely destroyed the balance of power in that area....

    First off, it was a UNITED NATIONS resolution. Yes, there was American pressure, but we didn't act alone there.

    Second, what "balance" of power? You imply that the region was somehow stable, and that setting aside the Israeli state somehow tipped the scale....

    The middle east never was, and never will be stable. The existance of Israel doesn't matter, they will still kill each other.

  88. Re:At last! A way to fairly compare PS2 and XBOX by damiam · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, because the PS2-linux system supports accelerated 3D graphics. The XBox might too, in a while.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  89. Re:Better $200 PC than Xbox by Glytch · · Score: 2

    The question, of course, being which evil empire you'd rather support less.

  90. Screw the game companies by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

    > The only harm you'd do is to the game companies
    > trying to sell games. Not cool. Not cool at all.

    No, screw em hard and screw em now. Any company that gets in bed with M$ gets screwed into the ground eventually. Best they get burned now while they still have other markets. They can take a hit to their stock price, what they can't take is allowing M$ to run Nintendo & Sony out and then be forced to assume the position, leaving M$ the only game company.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Screw the game companies by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Yeah, good idea, get them burned before they've had a chance to make money. Nice Starbucksian business strategy there.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Screw the game companies by yatest5 · · Score: 1

      sig: If it's theft to listen to music before buying it, then it's theft to refuse returns on albums that suck.

      No it's not. Dickwad.

      a) It isn't theft to listen to music before buying it. It's breaking copyright law to make unauthorised copies of said music.

      b) Your second point is just dumb.

      Change your shitty sig, fucktard.

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    3. Re:Screw the game companies by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      ") It isn't theft to listen to music before buying it. It's breaking copyright law to make unauthorised copies of said music."

      Sorry, but the RIAA already gets an economy where customer satisfaction is not guaranteed. They created a situation where people'd want to try shit out.

      And why is my second point just dumb? Is that all you have to say? Saying somebody's point is dumb without having a reason to back that up is just dumb. Heh.

      And no, I'm not going to change my sig, why dontcha grow up instead? I make a pretty good point actually. Too bad you're assuming things that aren't true. I guess it's hard to see when your point of view is obustructed by your anus.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Screw the game companies by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Shut up dick-for-brains. You don't even know what he's taliking about, so you don't know what you're talking about.

    5. Re:Screw the game companies by yatest5 · · Score: 1

      that was pretty weak, you big puff.

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    6. Re:Screw the game companies by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "that was pretty weak, you big puff."

      So, in other words, I was right and you have no means to defend yourself. Weenie.

    7. Re:Screw the game companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAAH! He got his butt kicked!! What a n00b!

  91. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by barake · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sorry, but as it is my understanding, we (America) stood by while the people we now call Israelies did what the Palestinians are doing now, so many years ago. The Israelies did worse, when they were the ones without a real country. If you want to find out about all this, TLC or Discovery ran a very well informed special on the subject.

  92. Let's not tarnish their hard work . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    First, only fixed costs decrease as volume increases. Since the xbox is basically a lower end pc (which is a mature and highly competitive market), I am willing to bet my Economic's degree that the majority of their costs are variable in nature (very easy MES point, not ideal for monopolies, low fixed costs).

    Second, the unbought xbox verse hacked xbox losses to MS projection is correct in a per box analysis. However, total losses will be much higher from the hacked xbox due to the asymetric nature of information in these circumstances.

    Third, these guys are "cool" (check out their music videos). At every point of the development of Linux, there was always someone there to complain that it just didn't make sense to port to this platform or write a clone of that application. After a decade of stubborness, the community has something to brag about, and humanity has a tool that does not discriminate based on the distribution of wealth.

    In conclusion, there is no corporate front sacred from the scrutiny and manipulation from those possessing the ability to do so. Corporations are the creations of man and, therefore, must be constantly judged by man. If a corporation were to fall from grace in the eyes of individuals savvy enough and many enough, its fate would be sealed. In the end, I do not see hate as being their motivation, but their belief that what is good, will continue to survive. Their job is simply to hasten our journey to that conclusion.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  93. Re: DRM Can't be done by Beansack · · Score: 1

    Which gives me an idea. As long as Microsoft wants to continue to compete in the low end they mush make DRM truly optional. Their software is now the most expensive part of a computer. The hardware has been getting cheaper and cheaper and ther software is getting more expensive. Otherwise the cost of closed hardware will drive the demand for alternitives and drive MS into Apple territory. Afterall, if MS is able to fritz chip all pcs, what will be the difference between PCs and Apples. Not a whole lot.

  94. Hard drive not big enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need at least 30 gigs for 6 hours.
    With an 8 gig XBox drive you can tape just 1.5 hours.

  95. Re:A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on X by Accipiter · · Score: 2

    Loose != Lose

    Look it up!

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  96. Re:A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on X by Slowping · · Score: 1

    My question (which I'm sure others have also raised), is why it is a good thing if Microsoft doesn't make an Xbox2?

    I'm not attacking neverkevin.... I'm just curious as to what people are thinking. Making Microsoft lose money on the XBox will only cause them to shut down the XBox unit. It's not really going to hurt their Windows or Office units.

    Isn't competition a good thing? Even though I have no wish to see Microsoft dominate the set-top-box market, their huge budget and presence forces all others to continue with innovation.

    I enjoy seeing boxes hacked, like the Dreamcast. I also like seeing Linux being used in creative locations. But I wouldn't go as far as to say we should somehow drive a potential competitor out of a market.

    --
    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    *beware the cute-bunny virus
  97. Re:A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Isn't competition a good thing?

    Yes.

    > Even though I have no wish to see Microsoft dominate the set-top-box market, their huge budget and presence forces all others to continue with innovation.

    But that is Microsoft's MO. Their huge budget and presence WILL be used to force all others out of the market.

    Bad actors are bad actors. They need to be replaced by good actors, not appologized for. People have to realize that it is OK to "kill" a Microsoft for it's abysmal behavior. A fully capable replacement WILL pop up, and it WILL have learned better.

  98. Re: DRM Can't be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You worry too much, it won't happen. I'm not gonna buy a DRM enabled motherboard/cpu until I've found a hack for it on the net.

  99. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Probably because the Muslims already found a better way to conqueror you Europeans types. It's called outbreeding.

    Holy crap. Did your Klan Khief tell you that?

    Also, let's see. American National Guard is part of our military.

    And don't those damn, dirty Kent State hippies know it?! Wonder how many Bush offed?

    What have you Austrailians done recently? Mick Dundee movies? Fosters?

    Hey, at least my country didn't make those Police Academy movies.

    Sigh. Whatever. Trying to run the world... yet not expanding our borders in how long now? 50 years? Try again.

    Try not being so naive. It turns out that military and/or economic pressure can be a pretty effective tool for making sure you get your way in any country no matter where the geographical borders lie.

    Go ahead, call me a communist. It'll make you feel better. Better yet... call me a communist, slap a trade emargo on me, invade me, install and heavily arm a government that's more friendly to multinational investment, remove minimum wages (an unholy restriction on free trade) then replace the sustenance crops with cash crops for export (who needs to eat anyway?). Go on, it'll feel sooooooo good.

  100. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >That's just rediculous!

    Some might even say it was ridiculous.

  101. Composite monitor by insanegadgets.com · · Score: 1

    They use this type of monitor because it has a composite connection. This is the easiest way of connecting the Xbox to a monitor.

    1. Re:Composite monitor by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      They use this type of monitor because it has a composite connection.

      It also has a separated-video connection.

  102. Hey look! by Pacorro · · Score: 1


    My Xbox is now an X box, because it runs X.

  103. You already can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xbox Media Player lets you watch streaming videos (divx,avi,mpg etc) and listen to mp3s store on your PC. Have been playing with it all week.

    AND ITS FREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  104. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    finally, someone with a sense of balance. Too bad most people filter out the truth.

  105. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad but true. Sept11 has to be because of the US's extreme favoritism to Israel and the dictators of the middle-east(saudis, pakistan,taliban-pre 9/11). Don't hold your breath for CNN to run a special on it, just ask any Muslim, in any part of the globe.

  106. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yay to the american bashing!

  107. Sorry, no 200K. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    It says something like 'runs with slight modifications'. *MEEEEP!*
    Wrong answer.

    200K still waiting for anyone who dares to go for it.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  108. What makes XBox hacking cool and uncool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While hacking the XBox to put Linux on it may hurt Microsoft, it isn't cheap enough or available to enough of the market that the Microsoft XBox targets to cause Microsoft concern.

    However, it is still cool. Microsoft is a company that makes products. You may love the products, or you may hate the products. You may love the way that Microsoft practices business (i.e. you go to business school), or you may hate it (i.e. you sell competing software, and MS just stripped you of your market share with some product integration).

    Anyway, the XBox is a cool product, and for a small fee, you can buy a hardware hack that voids your warranty (not like you care at this point) and lets you do more with the hardware. If that is running XBox Linux, then by all means, run XBox Linux. If that means running DivX and MP3 from your XBox, then that's cool. If you want to throw up a game of Quake 2 or something on your TV, all power to you.

    However, as much as I think that XBox hacking is cool, please buy the software that you use on it. Pirating software sucks. Yeah, yeah, we all pirate software is no excuse to be stealing someone else's property, and if piracy becomes the number one reason to get a mod chip, then Microsoft will start suing mod chip manufacturers over DMCA laws and winning (all the mod chips do is defeat the encryption mechanism), and then you ruin it for everyone.

    I personally love the ability to run my Farscape DivXs off the XBox rather than having to use my old PC with the TV Outs. It's far more convenient to just put in the DivX CDs into the tray than it is to go into the back room and setup the divx program and run around so I don't miss the first few seconds... All I need now is the ability to record the TV and encode it to DivX without my old PC... I guess I can wait for the Windows Media Center edition and buy another expensive hardware toy.

    Ah well, that's what happens when you come out of college to find cash burning a hole in your pocket.

  109. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The coolest part of this post is where he says East Timor is irrelevant.

    God, that is so fucking funny.

    It is only relevant when Americans die, not when Americans are responsible for thousands of non-Americans dying.

    That is so funny.

    Especially since you can run linux on an X-box, or whatever the topic is.

  110. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are significant between loose [dictionary.com] and lose [dictionary.com]

    Good job.

    They're's a big differance betwixt "There are significant between" and "There are significant differences between"
    Thanks for pointing that out. You are making the world a better place.

    Ah,well,backtowork.

  111. Extremely Important by nathanh · · Score: 2

    I see a lot of people justifying the worth of this port. Some people say it's "sticking it to Microsoft". Others say it creates well needed negative publicity for DRM. But I'm not seeing a lot of people talking about the obvious benefit: MORE VALUE FOR THE CONSUMER!

    Imagine a CD from AOL with Mozilla on it. The only instructions required are "Insert this disc into your X-Box". The CD connects to AOL automatically. You enter a unique code (perhaps printed on the CD sleeve) and the login process is completed. In under a minute you're sending and receiving email and browsing the web. Text entry could be via an on-screen "virtual keyboard" or a USB keyboard with an appropriate dongle.

    Don't like the ISP idea? How about a Logitech USB keyboard bundled with a complete office suite on an X-Box disc. Automatic bootstrap straight into OpenOffice. Files are saved to the conveniently included hard disk. Logitech can bundle appropriate dongles to connect their USB keyboard and a USB printer to the Microsoft-USB ports. Home users who can't afford (or don't want) a PC can still reap the benefits of a word processor at home.

    This is a huge opportunity for companies to to reach a wider audience. Linux is irrelevant. What is relevant is APPLICATIONS and a closed well-defined system that can run them. If you only think of an X-Box as a games console then you're not going to be convinced. If you think of it as a cheap computer with a hard disk and broadband connection that millions of people have in their homes, then you'll understand that Linux/X-Box really is important.

  112. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by dagga2oxx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    >No, I said Bill Clinton specifically.

    If you take a quick look at some economic statistics, you will see that your beloved country was gaining funds at a high rate during the mandate of this man, and now you are being robbed again. Isn't it wonderful to see all those billions of your hard earned national funds (you paid for it) being baked into exquisite deadly machinery and blown to pieces with a bunch of peasants on the other side of the world.

    >Probably because the Muslims already found a
    >better way to conqueror you Europeans types.
    >In 500 years at current rates, Europe will be
    >all Muslim. Something to think about.

    I see, your particular interrests in the conflict seem to be getting rid of people who don't think like you. That's a subject of admiration, let's all give the righteous and true americans a jolly applause.

    >There is no excuse for the slaughter of innocent
    >civilans.

    The problem with this sentence is the bush-crypto. Decrypted version: "There is no excuse for the slaughter of american civilians, any other is fine, our media will filter it out for some sweet green paper."

    >We're loathed because we're successful. Same with
    >the Isrealis.

    Actually, I feel sorry for you guys, having to maintain that superficial and bogus national character all your lives. Not to forget, Americans are the English, Dutch, Portuguese and Spanish people that the European colonisation fleets left there few hundred years ago. Your country has no history but the indians, and their blood is also on your hands. The lack of heritage is probably why you seem so oblivious to the extreme inhumane nature of your country's moves internationally. I hope you wake up with a smile on your face every morning, satisfied in knowing that your dollars are being employed exactly for what you chose in the election, spilling blood and oppressing.

    >What puppet state are we supporting in the
    >region? The only one that even comes close is
    >Saudi Arabia, and I'd dare say that they're
    >next on the list.

    Oh dear, I believe we've met Mr.Indoctrinated himself.
    Your country wanted the russians out of Afghanistan, so you raised a terrorist army.
    This terrorist army had friends which were oppressed by other hypocrite moves made by your country, for instance the palestinians and the iraqi.
    Some of them decided to give your country some of it's own medicine, by means of a cowardly act (which your country has made countless).
    This cowardly act killed but a few thousands of your country's people, and yet, to you it seems as if it's the first time someone got killed.
    Man, your media holds you by the spinal cord. You are helping them every day.
    Your media is owned by the very rich. The very rich protect the interrests of the very rich.
    Every time I hear an American speak on the subject, he sounds almost psychotic in again and again trying to assure to himself that patriotism is the answer. Is patriotism the solution? What is patriotism going to do to a conflict? It doesn't take a genious to answer this, but to get an honest answer, maybe it takes a non-patriot.

    >The missile defense has nothing to do with
    >fighting terrorists per se, but is a method of
    >protecting North America from the occasional
    >rogue missile from unfriendly nation states.

    And again, don't you ever wonder why these states have become unfriendly? Do you really think they hate your country for no reason?
    If the U.S. government would for once be unselfish, let a few oil, locational and religion-related strongholds go, declare neutrality and conformance with the U.N. policy, and withdraw to a normal international discussion, they could resolve this whole conflict within months. Better yet, as your government swear by the grace of god, in god we trust and so on, you could even call it a great act of christian compassion. Turn the other cheek aside, remember?

    Anyway, the decadence of the american people's spirit is the main problem in my opinion.
    Listen to Eminem, that guy puts it in clear text sometimes.

    --
    icq: 4333444 aim: dagga2oxx
  113. I might be wrong.... by akincisor · · Score: 1

    ... but I think that people buy game consoles to have fun. If some people are having a lot of fun by fiddling around with the Xbox doing anything, loading Linux on it inclusive, I think that thats good. I'm not so sure this is hurting M$ very much, it seems to me that this is bringing it additional publicity, not to mention the number of linux-geeks who will be buying Xboxes to try it out! just a thought

  114. What a logic... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You finance MS but that means you cost them cash.

    Lets see, situation 1, you buy a Xbox,

    MS invests around 350 in each Xbox: -350
    You buy an Xbox: +200

    Total for MS: -150 (plus the potential to recoup money via games, because you will buy games once the box is gathering dust there).

    Situation 2, you don't buy a Xbox,
    MS invests around 350US$ in each Xbox: -350

    Total for MS: -350. Full stop, you will not buy games even if you were tempted to.

    Now tell me, what costs MS more?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  115. Stop helpping Bill by ghinckley68 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to deal with MS software and servers all day long and they suck. However while i do not like what MS intentions with xbox are(ie dominate yet a another market) i do think the xbox is a fantastic little box. If you are running linux on it just to say you can do it great. But dont think that it is hurting them, your are doing for more to help MS then Bill could ever hope to buy. Free publicity! The best way to fight MS is to deny them existance. How many of these are going to get converted world wide a few hundred maby a 1000 tops. Bill spends that kinda of money on breakfest. Stop kidding your self people you are helpping him not hurtung him.

    --
    Linux modi 2.6.26-2-parisc
  116. Xbox has advantage over PS2 running linux by joeler · · Score: 1

    Xbox definitely has the advantage over the PS2 for running linux, as Xbox is nothing more than a stripped down pc. It is good for those people that tied up a lot of money in the Xbox, now they have more use for it. Although linux runs on the PS2, it's not going to be the primary reason people buy a PS2 because many linux programs require more porting to work on the non-intel PS2 system- more people will continue to buy the PS2 because that is where the most/best games are. Linux is great, I use it exclusively but when it comes to games, nothing beats the PS2.

    --
    >>>please remove "nospam" from email address
  117. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see, your particular interrests in the conflict seem to be getting rid of people who don't think like you. That's a subject of admiration, let's all give the righteous and true americans a jolly applause.

    No. I think his particular interest in the conflict is getting rid of the people that want to kill innocent American civilians.....you smug fuck.

    Actually, I feel sorry for you guys, having to maintain that superficial and bogus national character all your lives. Not to forget, Americans are the English, Dutch, Portuguese and Spanish people that the European colonisation fleets left there few hundred years ago.

    And after being left here a few hundred years ago, we turned around and bitch-slapped the British and declared that we would be on our own...then we had to jump in and cover your weak asses during WWII because you were about to be overrun. It's our world now, punk.

    Your country has no history but the indians, and their blood is also on your hands. The lack of heritage is probably why you seem so oblivious to the extreme inhumane nature of your country's moves internationally.

    WTF?!?!? America's displacement of the native savages for the purpose of developing history's greatest superpower is somehow worse than the British history of conquering foreign territories and forcing them to serve a fucking king?? Your crappy feudal system is somehow a history to be proud of? Don't even get me started on what you fuckers have done to the Irish.....and we've all seen Braveheart. And in the end, America is your daddy.

    Your media is owned by the very rich. The very rich protect the interrests of the very rich.

    What's your point? Oh....I see. Lemme get this straight. Since a large global media organization operating in the world's largest superpower is (obviously) owned by the rich, then those wealthy owners are micromanaging the producers and instructing them on the content to be broadcast by said media company. Go rent JFK and jack off in your mother's basement you retard. Intrinsic hate and mistrust of the wealthy may rile the masses in your crappy socialist region of the world, but over here people usually get rich because they work hard not because they were born into some arbitrarily higher class of society.

    Do you really think they hate your country for no reason?

    No, I think they hate my country for invalid reasons.....because they're a bunch of ignorant rock-chunking sand niggers that used to have global influence in the middle ages when their made up religion was cool and now they're just middle eastern trash who can't deal with the fact that they've been reduced to an insignificant culture with little or nothing to contribute to the world except suicide bombers expecting a heavenly piece of ass.

    If the U.S. government would for once be unselfish, let a few oil, locational and religion-related strongholds go, declare neutrality and conformance with the U.N. policy, and withdraw to a normal international discussion, they could resolve this whole conflict within months.

    Fuck the U.N. We don't need their permission or anybody else's to run this world the way we see fit. If you think you can do better, create your own superpower.

  118. Question: why, except for the kewl factor? by jopet · · Score: 1

    Maybe I am missing something, but why would I want to use a Xbox running linux? True, the hardware is very cheap, but: on the one hand there are no good linux games I would want to play on the linux-Xbox. On the other hand the hardware isn't fit to be used as a cheap replacement for e.g. a router or a workstation for development or office applications. I dont see the point.

  119. Re:yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some might say you didn't get the joke.

  120. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoooa, huh, huh,

    he said "sand niggers"

  121. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by darien · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If you think you can do better, create your own superpower.

    We're on the case.

  122. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck the U.N. We don't need their permission or anybody else's to run this world the way we see fit. If you think you can do better, create your own superpower.



    Interesting, maybe this is what this Bin Laden character
    had in mind.

  123. Re:A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Competition is a great thing. It is what encourages capitalist companies to improve their products. Without competition the only motivation left is for them to improve their profit. Since Microsoft have clearly shown that they are not interested in beating their competition with a better product instead resorting to underhand monopolistic practices, lawsuits and atempting to buzzword their way into the next generation (.NET), I have no interest in seeing competition from them anymore. The sooner they get the fuck out of the market the better.

  124. I use this one by Lispy · · Score: 1

    as my bedroom tv. And of course whenever i wanna play some c=64er games...

  125. Almost by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    > When you're playing a game, you're not doing anything else, period, and you expect real-time performance from your computer.

    For most games & gamers, yes, I would agree - the game IS the computer.

    However I can provide a few examples where that's not 100% correct.

    When I was playing UO, I always had UO Assist, ICQ, and UO Map running. Other guilds (usually PK ones) ran IRC in the background. Why? Because the game didn't provide the proper tools to automate a lot of tedious activity / communication.

    In D2X, I usually alt-tab out to RuneWizard (to check rune words), to diabloii.net (to check stats on items), to ChippyDips skill calc, and/or to my spreadsheet template of my character's stats/skills.

    Another example: Playing a (single player) rpg/shooter, and I'm stuck for the past 30 mins. I tried everything I can think of, but it hasn't helped. Alt-Tab out to google or gamefaqs and hit the walkthru to get a hint. I know it would of been a huge PITA to quit the game, load the browser, check the info, then restart the game.

    Granted, I'm a power-gamer, but I can't be the only one, who finds it extremely frustrated when I can't alt-tab out of a game on my computer.

    Now for a console, there is no need to switch to another app in the middle of game, since you can't anyways. However, that doesn't mean you don't want access to other info when you are playing the game! What I do instead is use my main computer to load up the FAQs :-) since it is adjacent to my consoles.
    i.e. I want to try out some of the interesting cheat codes in GTA3. Pause the game, look at the computer beside me, then go back to the game.

    My $0.03

    Cheers

  126. Re:A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on X by Ost99 · · Score: 1
    Of course , Sony's business practices aren't much better then Microsoft, but that is going way off topic.
    Not much better? They are actually much worse. While Microsoft is off killing competitors, Sony is out forcing DRM on Microsoft and buying politicans in order to make it law.

    What is worse? A monopoly on closed source OS, or the extinction of the pc? If Sony and Disney get it the way they want, the PC dies and a DRM Microsoft machine replaces it. Microsoft would be more than happy to just sell Office and WinXX with a subscription model giving them say $150 a year for 95% of all desktop PCs. They would NEVER have pusshed for DRM if they didn't think it would be mandated by law. Now they are just making sure they still sell 95% of all OS's (the fact that they now will sell 100% doesn't hurt, but that cannot be why MS is doing this).

    Still off topic, but Sony ain't better at all.

    - Ost
    --
    ---- Sig. gone.
  127. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want to say one thing, all of you euro-peons out there, just remember that when one of these ass-backwards middle eastern countries get the bomb, its going to be a hell of a lot more easier for them to point it at Europe than at the US. Are you comfortable with iraq having an a-bomb if you live in eastern-Europe? They are not going to have the missles to deliver it to the US, but they will be able to shoot it over to Europe within a few years.

    Ah yes...neutrality, that worked great for France in WWII.

    I hope that we find a replacement for oil soon, then the middle-east can wither itself back into the middle ages, and leave us the fuck alone. or lets go pull our troops back, and the Koreas' can start fighting again, innocent people in Bosnia can be slaughtered again, and hell can breakout in all the other places where our troops are. lets just build a big fucking wall around the US, and the rest of the world can fend for themselves. and when the next hitler comes rolling through europe, good luck this time!

    - a proud american

  128. STFU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH THE MICROSOFT-LOSES-MONEY-THING! IT IS NOT FUNNY ANYMORE!

    I fucking type in caps if I want to, you lame filter. I fucking type in caps if I want to, you lame filter.

  129. A few points to ponder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To clear up a few things for people.

    The xbox can be connected to a VGA monitor with an adapter.

    The Modchip bios replacements are now so easy that even an idiot can install them. Basically its place the module over the lpc bus , heat up some points with a soldering iron. Then attach one wire. Takes all of 10 minutes.

    You can replace the xbox hard drive with another drive. I use a 40GB drive in mine.

    Xbox linux has the ability to read and write FatX just fine.

    Once chipped it has full network capability. You can assign it an ip, ftp to it, telnet, etc.

    It allows copying of your purchased games to the xbox hard drive for playing. Enabling you to put 20 games on the drive and never have to load up the original. No more disc swapping between games . Go to your friends house and just take the box, no dvd's need be carried.

    Linux on xbox is progressing nicely. Give us all time to figure out the format of the xbox hardware.

    Emulators are around such as Xmame, Xsnes, etc which contain all the roms on one disc with the emulator, so its boot and play.

    There are also media players which allows playing of divx, vcd, avi, mpg, mp3, dvd. Either from the drive or the xbox hard drive, and yes even over the network.

    Xbox infared interface has been cracked so remote control function is now useable and reprogrammable to whatever you want to use it for.

    People are starting to work on an open source xbox sdk for home brew game design. I personally would love to write my own xbox titles that run under linux or the xbox itself.

    I really can't see anyone not wanting one with all of these features and more to come.

  130. Re:A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank goodness someone else finally noticed. The misuse of the word "loose" on Slashdot and elsewhere on the internet really bugs the holy hell out of me. I would have sworn that I was the last english-speaking person on the planet that knew the difference and that the next edition of the OED would cave in and rewrite the definition.

    Maybe I just need to spend less time reading Slashdot.

  131. Cheap Linux box that costs MS money by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    It may seem strange to buy a "PC" from Microsoft to run Linux, but let's look at it a little closer.

    Microsoft LOSES money with each XBox sold. They hope to recoup that money by selling licenses to the game manufacturers. So, if say a few million XBoxes were to be sold without any game purchases it'll go straight to MS's bottom line. (So maybe it's not as ironic as it might seem.)

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:Cheap Linux box that costs MS money by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Sheesh, someone always posts this on an X-box article (this is what, the 4th time in this particular one?)...

      MS already made the X-boxes. They've already lost the money. You buy an X-box, you're reducing their UNSOLD INVENTORY - you're giving them money back.

      MS will not go bankrupt because you buy their unsold boxes. Please get that into your head.

    2. Re:Cheap Linux box that costs MS money by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Yay!! Common sense prevailed!!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  132. Re: DRM Can't be done by pmz · · Score: 1

    ...what happens when better integration prevents you from being able to "chip" a machine?

    Anyone out there know how much it would cost to put the important parts of a PC onto one chip using modern manufacturing techniques? This would mean anything significant to DRM (cpu, audio, and graphics) would need to be in one package soldered to the circuit board. I suppose it would have to include encrypted IDE and memory busses, too. If this can be done within the price ranges typcial for a PC, it will be done, and we really need to worry about it.

  133. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't run my "ass", ignorant piece of shit...

  134. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by dagga2oxx · · Score: 0

    Wow, what aggression, I guess I was right because it seems that hurt.

    --
    icq: 4333444 aim: dagga2oxx
  135. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by dagga2oxx · · Score: 0

    >- a proud american

    Cool, a proud anonymous american.

    I see no reason for Iraq to do anything against any European state. I am not comfortable with anyone having a bomb, especially not the nasty mass destruction bombs. The problems can only increase with bombs. I don't believe that Iraq will launch any missile unless they are attacked. I can see Mr. Bush attack them well this fall though, as the congress election is coming up and about everything but the crushing of limbs and expensive equipment is diving over there.

    Face it, your country gained it's position with oil and wants to prevent the discovery of a replacement at any cost.

    Europe was not united when world war 2 occured. Germany was the strongest military power in Europe at that time. European countries have a tradition of not budgeting so much weapons, in favour of things that their people gain from, but the european union has more people and greater monetary reserves than the U.S.

    --
    icq: 4333444 aim: dagga2oxx
  136. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
    Europe was not united when world war 2 occured. Germany was the strongest military power in Europe at that time. European countries have a tradition of not budgeting so much weapons, in favour of things that their people gain from, but the european union has more people and greater monetary reserves than the U.S.

    You euros have been loging for the days of good old Rome for over 1500 years. Many have tried to strip away your nation identities through war, now the mega rich are trying to do it through trade but the result will be the same. Your like a buck of emotionally stunted adults longing for to be kids again, get over it and grow up.

    If you all want to surrender yourselves to an authority so you can compete with us, good luck to ya'. Youll learn the hard way... again..

    --
  137. Re:Stupid dittohead bitch by octalc0de · · Score: 1

    Why is this modded down? This is a great post. Although it could be Offtopic, it at least warrants a (Score: 1 Offtopic).

  138. Re:Stupid dittohead bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf "dittohead"?!? At least learn some better insults.

    G.H.W. Bush left Saddam in power, and also left 6,000 troops in Saudi Arabia (which is one of the main reasons Osama declared war on the US, according to him), and it's ALL CLINTON'S FAULT!!

    Clinton could've taken out Bin Ladin but he didn't because he's one of you pussy, non-violence, draft dodging, downsize the military, demagogues. So as a result of inaction, Clinton fucked up far worse than Bush Sr. who, by taking the (albeit questionable) action of kicking Iraq's ass and leaving troops in Saudi to watch Saddam, supposedly provoked a regional tyrant who would've used any possible excuse to attack America anyway. The reason Bush Sr. didn't take out Saddam is because all of you whiny liberal pussies were complaining about that war the entire time....killing Saddam would've inflamed the situation even further. Now, Bush wants to attack again and all of the democrats have jumped on the bandwagon and are fully behind him.

    If the Democrats and Clinton/Gore are so terrible, why did more people vote for Gore than for Bush? If everything was as plain and obvious as you say, why did over 51 million Americans not feel that GWB was the best choice?

    What revisionist history book are you reading from? Bush got more votes than Gore. Once again, your demagogues got you all excited with lawsuits at the time, but well after the election issue was settled and when they had all the time in the world for excessive recounts, the liberals in Miami tucked their tails between their legs and admitted that Bush had more votes. You're one of those idiots that was confused by the ballot aren't you?

    Things aren't black and white, bucko. Most politicians are corrupt one way or another, your boy George (pun intended) is no different. If the things that happened during Enron and the other scandals happened under Clinton, you and all your dittohead buddies would be screaming bloody fucking murder. But since it was your boy, it's your turn to say, "There's no evidence, and if the courts don't find anything Bush is innocent, and we shouldn't have a Senate investigation, that will just waste tax payer money divide the country." Sound familiar?

    No, it doesn't sound familiar. Should it? Did Bush get a blowjob from Enron and then later lie about it? Did he continue to lie his sleazy draft-dodging ass off about it untill millions of dollars were spent on an investigation that finally forced him to fess up because he was cornered and had his cum stain on Enron's dress?

    Look, I'm not arguing that Bush is Mother Theresa and Clinton is Satan....I'm just saying that you liberal droids need to open your eyes and develop a sense of shame. Your guy was an embarassment. His inaction (not taking out Bin Ladin) and his action (Lewinsky) have proven that he's an all around fuckup and all you can do is talk shit about others or point to better economic times during his tenure...and then there's all the shit he pulled as he left office(lootng the whitehouse, pardoning whoever) So what if Bush snorted powder? I also am the first one to say 'so what?' about Clinton smoking weed. Those are minor pecadillos inflated by a bullshit war on drugs mentality. The fact is that despite.....fuck it, I'm rambling now.

  139. BUT ITS MICROSOFT by ftg888 · · Score: 1

    I will not have anything that microsoft makes/produces/blesses in my house. Its just
    wrong.

    Now the funny thing is NVIDIA is being investigated becuase it wrote down 7 million
    worth of useless graphics xbox chips just because
    MS changed their security roms.

    Wouldn't it be funny if MS DUMPED their BOX.

    XBOX going cheap......can you say SEGA....

    K.

  140. Re:Open source on XBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know where you're from, but here, men jumping on men sounds pretty fucking gay.

  141. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except the US is in the right and Bin Laden is a "rock-chunking sand nigger"

    God that phrase is so cool.

  142. Re:Open source on XBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well he is gay, which is why it makes perfect sense to him. Haven't you seen his self-portrait that he loves to link to?

  143. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by dagga2oxx · · Score: 0

    You euros have been loging for the days of good old Rome for over 1500 years. Many have tried to strip away your nation identities through war, now the mega rich are trying to do it through trade but the result will be the same. Your like a buck of emotionally stunted adults longing for to be kids again, get over it and grow up.

    If you all want to surrender yourselves to an authority so you can compete with us, good luck to ya'. Youll learn the hard way... again..


    You draw some weird conclusions, I give you that. Are you suggesting that nations age the way humans do, in the end reaching some geriatric stage? That is bizarre to say the least. It seems you also believe that the union is an authority completely separate from the countries it is made up of, from space or what?

    Europe has become very stable, and I am very very sure that there will be no wars within its borders again.
    --
    icq: 4333444 aim: dagga2oxx
  144. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

    are you as sure as the men who called WWI the war to end all wars??

    --
  145. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by dagga2oxx · · Score: 0
    are you as sure as the men who called WWI the war to end all wars??
    No single european country is currently even remotely hostile to another in any way, it just doesn't make any sense that there would be any war. It contradicts the whole fact of the working union.
    --
    icq: 4333444 aim: dagga2oxx
  146. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

    Wars usually break out when you least expect. I am not hoping for a war, but all it takes is one nutjob with a gun..

    --
  147. Re:Gee, you're a liar, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't try to tell me you don't know what a 'dittohead' is, since I'm sure you spend plenty of time listening to Rush.

    Apparently you spend plenty of time listening to Rush. I knew that 'dittohead' was some played out Rush thing from a while back....so I was suggesting you up the level of wit a little. But if you like Rush that much, then okay. But, you know, not everybody listens to popular political shows....some of us actually think independently and reason independently of others, forming our own conclusions. Apparently you're still a follower. Yeah, I've listened to Rush....when I was in high school.

    Don't get me wrong. Keep listening to Rush...you might grow from the experience.

    Please tell me where in my post I advocated non-violence or downsizing the military? Gee, you're not being presumptuous, are you? I'm pro-gun ownership, pro-strong military (we should be paying our military personnel much better than we are), pro-tax reduction. I'm also pro-marijuana decriminalization, pro-gay rights (including marriage) and pro-choice. Hmm, seems I'm really all about promoting FREEDOM AND LIBERTY, aren't I? Pretty tough to stick me in a box and slap a label on it.

    Ooooooooh. You're so different and unique!....can I touch you? I can see how you would be boisterous of the fact that you can't be easily labelled, many inexperienced thinkers come to similar conclusions. If you're hung up on labels, though, you're not that unique. Your positions put you in the left Libertarian category.

    As far as my reference to 'non-violence, draft dodging, and downsizing the military' is concerned, I was actually referring more to Clinton than to you personally. The usage of 'you' was more general, but I was willing to throw you into the mix since you saw fit to come to Clinton's defense. But if that's too subtle for you then I'm sorry for confusing you.

    Oh, and your use of the word 'demagogue' pretty much ices the fact that you're a dittohead, especially since you use it incorrectly, like Rush usually does. I suggest you look it up, webster.com is your friend.

    Once again -- betweent the two of us, you seem to be the great Rush fan. Keep taking your lead from popular speakers. As for the use of the word 'demagogue' to refer to Clinton, consider that Slick Wille was able to win over all of the fucking liberals in the country after the embarrasing shit he pulled. And black people seem to thing he's actually black. Bullshitting the common man is a definite characteristic of demagoguery. The word 'sophist' would've been more accurate (especially after his infamous debating of the meaning of the word 'is'), but I thought that might be too obscure of a word for someone who throws around the word 'dittohead'. Apparently I was right, since you couldn't catch the sense in which I used 'demagogue'.

    Uhh, you wanna come forth with your 'source'? Here's mine:

    http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/results/


    That was a waste of research on your part. I was referring to the fact that Bush won Florida; Bush got the most votes in the disputed parts of Florida. But if you want to revel in the fact that Gore won the popular vote, then I should instruct you that in the US we use something called the 'electoral college' which, for reasons that may be too sophisticated for someone like you to comprehend in this brief reference, is actually the best democratic model for electing the president. But if you want to jump on the Hillary bandwagon and go on about eliminating the electoral college, go right ahead.

    d00d

    Cute.

  148. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, I'm a muslim and I was born in pakistan, who has lived in the US for 19 years. if you ask me, 9/11 was the result of an anti-progress fucktard as backwards as any abortion clinic bomber.

    but that doesn't fit your relativist worldview, does it. please don't paint all muslims as sub-moronic, religiously brainwashed idiots.

  149. you missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recommending the X-box means recommending the hardware standard known as the Xbox console. All of the other issues are defeated by using Linux.

    The only way to pervert that standard is by surrepetitiously replacing the hardware. Assuming that cheaper hardware is inferior hardware, they cannot do this without sacrificing compatibility to the existing Xbox standards. If they replace some hardware with superior performing hardware, then it can only be considered an upgrade once Linux supports it.

    While the Xbox may be proprietary, it doesn't seem to be proprietary as Sony's offering, so they probably can't get away with a Freedom binding "Linux kit". Note that Sony is probably more "evil" than microsoft to date, from their computer practices (read "proprietary" vaio) to their media practices (MPAA, RIAA, etc).

    So even if the X-Box should be avoided because of Microsoft, then the current best competition Sony should be avoided all the more for more global reasons.

    -castlan, moderating.