Re:I code C# for a living
on
Java 1.5 vs C#
·
· Score: 1
i code java for a living (and prefer it). but java does have some catching up to do). just comparing the langages: the generics are almost useless, no operator overloading, and how would you do custom attributes in java? like: http://www.mantrotech.com/technology/csharp/articl e_customattribute.asp
most programmers (and engineers) actually want to make something work (we *like* it). naict, most everyone else wants to build an empire or has some other agenda. so rhis result is not surprising.
xp was invented to combat this tendency at the development hierarchy level. maybe someone needs to invent xa?
throw this article entitles "Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm" at http://www.benkler.org/CoasesPenguin.PDF to the econ or legal types.
thanks
yes, you can buy the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L..., but be sure to get cables with both serial and parallel connectors and take a look at http://www.minuszerodegrees.ne... thanks
Worked at Hughes Aircraft in Fullerton. Sent punched cards off to an http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I... in Culver City and got the printout back the next day. Not exact;y doing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T... back then.
depending on where your time is going, consider splitting the file up into pieces and run each piece in a different thread.
i believe that the consensus is that the 23 *design* patterns in the gof (plus or minus a few) are orthogonal and complete.
there's a couple more flavours, see: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/395763/is-a-software-engineer-a-computer-science-major/396348#396348
you said design. look at cohesion and coupling from the structured programming era. also uncle bob's o-o design principles: http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/articles/Principles_and_Patterns.pdf. in architecture, the dependency inversion principle and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_Principle in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inversion_of_control frameworks like spring. you should expect to see o-o design patterns
adventure, then empire on a dec pdp-10
in polite company, i sometimes render the f as frog.
thanks
http://ifcx.org/wiki/AntAnywhere.html - not quite what you are doing, but might be relevant.
thanks
thanks
most programmers (and engineers) actually want to make something work (we *like* it). naict, most everyone else wants to build an empire or has some other agenda. so rhis result is not surprising.
xp was invented to combat this tendency at the development hierarchy level. maybe someone needs to invent xa?
read this excellent article at http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=506218.506 237 or http://tayek.com/~ray/xptools/p27-wang.html
interesting topic. this variation on mvc might be useful: http://www.atug.com/andypatterns/mgm.htm also perhaps: http://www.appdevadvisor.co.uk/Downloads/ADA5_9pdf s/Hunt5_9.pdf, http://www.jaydeetechnology.co.uk/planetjava/tutor ials/swing/The-Visitor-Framework.PDF, http://st-www.cs.uiuc.edu/users/droberts/evolve.ht ml,
http://www.rolemodelsoft.com/patterns/javaextend.h tm
hth
hth
throw this article entitles "Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm" at http://www.benkler.org/CoasesPenguin.PDF to the econ or legal types. thanks