Slashdot Mirror


User: myowntrueself

myowntrueself's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,028
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,028

  1. Re:gconf = regedit on Godwin's Law Invoked in Linus/Gnome Spat · · Score: 1

    So, I don't see Gnome as an improvement over Windows in terms of usability.

    Gnome is just Vista for Linux.

  2. Re:Luminosity on New Accelerator Technique Doubles Particle Energy · · Score: 1

    You can't just accelerate a few particles to high energies and say you are done. You're looking for rare processes

    Unless you are just looking to punch great smoking holes in tanks or something?

  3. Re:E=1/2 m v^2 on New Accelerator Technique Doubles Particle Energy · · Score: 1

    I didn't know 60 mph was close to c. Maybe for large values of 60?

    Or relativistic hours? I mean 'miles per hour' for a person travelling at relativistic speeds would be different from 'miles per hour' for a non-relativistic observer wouldn't it, since time dilation would mess with the hours? Or something like that?

  4. Re:OS X is already virtualised. on The Prospects For Virtualizing OS X · · Score: 1

    Why do you have to cut it in half?

    So I can glue it to the case more easily.

    Duh!

  5. Man I *hate* censorship on Web Censorship Proposed For Norway · · Score: 1

    In fact I might even set up a website devoted to encouraging hatred of censorship.

    Guess I better not go to Norway...

  6. Re:Apple should go for it on The Prospects For Virtualizing OS X · · Score: 1

    I've used VMWare and Xen and Xen definitely works far better for my purposes.

    Performance is hardly an issue and Xen is far easier to manage, its *open* and it works.

  7. Re:Why would anyone want to do this? on The Prospects For Virtualizing OS X · · Score: 1, Informative

    The only benefits of OS X are software, the hardware is the same as any other Intel PC these days, just has a different shiny wrapper on it.

    A shiny wrapper that says "Designed in California"!!!

  8. Re:Apple should go for it on The Prospects For Virtualizing OS X · · Score: 1

    Anybody who has used much virtualization knows it's not as good as running the OS on hardware.

    Dude!

    You must have been running VMWare! Try Xen.

    The less physical hardware I have in my machine room, the better. Every time we kick a server out of the room I celebrate.

  9. Re:Great Example Of Why Apple Changed Their Name on The Prospects For Virtualizing OS X · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I respectfully disagree. A lot of people care about the entire 'experience' of Apple products, from the quality packaging, to the clean, amazing hardware, to the OS.

    I am 100% with you there, I mean how many PCs do you open up and it says "Designed in California"?? And you can just imagine the bikini-clad chicks and smell the sunblock and hear the surf calling to you.

  10. Re:OS X is already virtualised. on The Prospects For Virtualizing OS X · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Mac OS X EULA says you can only run the software on Apple hardware.

    I don't get it.

    If I run Firefox on an XP virtual machine running on Apple hardware, then that instance of Firefox *IS* running on Apple hardware; it uses Apple memory and CPU in order to do its thing.

    If I run OSX in a virtual machine running on Apple hardware then OSX *IS* running on Apple hardware, surely this is the end of the story?

    Unless Apple *specifically* exclude virtualisation, I think its a red herring.

  11. Re:OS X is already virtualised. on The Prospects For Virtualizing OS X · · Score: 4, Funny

    How about if I cut *an* apple in half and stick *that* on my PC?

  12. Did we learn nothing from Cow and Chicken? on EU Bans Sock-Puppet Blogs · · Score: 1

    Did not a big fat pantsless red guy named Allen not teach us that sock puppets hold the key to world peace?

    Shame on the EU.

  13. Re:Beagle allready does this! on Spotlight Improvements In Leopard · · Score: 1

    I've just installed and trialed beagle.

    Its a nice start.

    Someone let me know when theres a web-based interface.

  14. Re:The difference on Two Ways Not To Handle Free Speech · · Score: 1

    No, Christianity DOES take itself seriously.

    Well ok.

    But noone else does...

  15. Re:The difference on Two Ways Not To Handle Free Speech · · Score: 1

    Are you beginning to see the picture? Certainly Christianity has a checkered past, but it embraced the Enlightenment and Reformation. It has moved past its sins. But Islam remains rooted in a violent medieval mindset.

    Or, alternatively, you could say that Christianity no longer takes itself seriously and that Islam takes itself way too seriously...

  16. Re:It wasn't religion, it was Islam; on Two Ways Not To Handle Free Speech · · Score: 1

    The IRA

    The Irish conflict was not one of religion. The IRA did not kill based on religion. It was (maybe still is) about political independence and secession from the UK.

    The fact that it happened to be Catholics vs Protestants was merely an accident of history, not due to religious doctrine.

    Thats why the 'Protestant' paramilitarys were referred to as "Loyalists"; because they were "Loyal" (under a very wierd definition of the term) to the crown (of the UK). Whereas the 'Catholic' paramilitarys wanted independence and (re)unification with Eire.

    It was not a religious conflict.

  17. Re:Mormons are Christians on Two Ways Not To Handle Free Speech · · Score: 1

    So Mormons are Christian pretty much in the same way that Muslims are Christian.

    And as much as Christianity is a sect of Judaism.

    Honestly, I've known Christians who claim just that... ie that they are Jews.

  18. Re:Missed the Boat on Missing the Boat on Java's Greatest Missed Opportunity? · · Score: 1

    Ok maybe '94 or so, it was a long time ago. You are right; this was a Linux box I was running it on.

    But I had a PC with, at the time, a huge amount of memory, running Linux and I thought StarOffice would be a great tool. It crippled my computer whenever I ran it.

    Emacs + Latex was way more useable.

  19. Re:Was there "time" before 15-20 Billion years ago on New Universes Will be Born from Ours · · Score: 1

    Why does there have to be an end? Why cant it be turtles all the way down?

    Turtles all the way up too...

  20. Re:Please... on New Universes Will be Born from Ours · · Score: 1

    So in the meantime I am currently undecided, a fact for which my Christian friends tell me I am undoubtedly going to hell for.

    Ok well how about this line of reasoning...

    God must be perfect and omnipotent.

    A God which is limited in some way, ie there are things that this God cannot do is less then perfect, is not omnipotent.

    A God which is bound by logical necessity is limited; there are things which such a God cannot do.

    But a God which is not bound by logical necessity is not limited; it can do anything, even things which are contradictory such as creating a rock so heavy that he cannot lift it and *still* be able to lift it.

    However, a God which is not bound by logical necessity cannot exist (nature abhors a contradiction as much as it abhors a vacuum).

    Therefore the *most* perfect God is the God which does not exist. Since this God is not bound by logican necessity, this does not matter to it as it embraces all contradictions.

    Hence, a God which does not exist is more perfect than a God which does exist and therefore God does not exist.

    QED.

  21. Re:Please... on New Universes Will be Born from Ours · · Score: 1

    Who needs those complicated science models. Three words, no models necessary: "God"

    Its the ultimate Occams Razor.

    And you thought christians wern't logicians...

  22. Re:Missed the Boat on Missing the Boat on Java's Greatest Missed Opportunity? · · Score: 1

    Or maybe it had something to do with the fact that OpenOffice was based on StarOffice? You know, the Office Suite that was developed back in 1986?

    The crazy thing was that -- as advanced as StarOffice was for 1986 -- it consumed memory at a prodigious rate. 128M just after the application started, before you started doing anything.

    In 1986 128M was a HUGE amount of memory by any desktop standards.

    And why do you suppose it consumed so much RAM?

    Couldn't be anything to do with java, could it?

  23. Re:Booooo! on Cartoon Network CEO Resigns Over Aqua Teen Scare · · Score: 1

    Cartoon Network stand up to the stupid city of Boston!

    Since obviously Boston must be right at the top of every terrorists hit-list it is the duty of every citizen of Boston and every visitor to Boston to report to the authorities every single cardboard box, plastic bag, discarded supermarket trolly that they see left unattended anywhere in the city.

    Everyone in Boston, DO THIS one simple thing and the terrorists will soon have lost!

  24. Re:Help, not screen on Breakdown Forces New Look At Mars Mission Sexuality · · Score: 2, Funny

    The court system isn't fun for anyone....the victim, the criminal, their families.

    Oh I don't know.

    Judge Judys court is downright hilarious!

  25. Re:Your sources are unreliable on Breakdown Forces New Look At Mars Mission Sexuality · · Score: 1

    Try Rudyard Kipling for a taste of how the old Navy fared :)

    You'll find more info at:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raid_on_the_Medway

    The Dutch in the Medway.

    If wars were won by feasting,
        Or victory by song,
    Or safety found in sleeping sound,
        How England would be strong!
    But honour and dominion
        Are not maintained so.
    They're only got by sword and shot,
        And this the Dutchmen know!

    The moneys that should feed us
        You spend on your delight,
    How can you then have sailor-men
        To aid you in your fight?
    Our fish and cheese are rotten,
        Which makes the scurvy grow--
    We cannot serve you if we starve,
        And this the Dutchmen now!

    Our ships in every harbour
        Be neither whole nor sound,
    And, when we seek to mend a leak,
        No oakum can be found;
    Or, if it is, the caulkers,
        And carpenters also,
    For lack of pay have gone away,
        And this the Dutchmen know!

    Mere powder, guns, and bullets,
        We scarce can get at all;
    Their price was spent in merriment
        And revel at Whitehall,
    While we in tattered doublets
        From ship to ship must row,
    Beseeching friends for odds and ends--
          And this the Dutchmen know!

    No King will heed our warnings,
        No Court will pay our claims--
    Our King and Court for their disport
        Do sell the very Thames!
    For, now De Ruyter's topsails
        Off naked Chatham show,
    We dare not meet him with our fleet--
        And this the Dutchmen know!