Feminists tend not to make a fuss about homeless men because homeless men don't do a lot of oppressing. But more seriously, the issues you are talking about are entirely down to a patriarchical society and expecting men to behave and exist in a certain way in order to be culturally accepted. Get rid of that and maybe men might be better off as well.
Once you start adjusting for exposure, women tend to be far worse off. They are not gang members or drug dealers and clearup rates are higher because it's usually their boyfriends/husbands that kill them.
OMG the poor menz who are better paid and 82% of CS graduates might not be quite as privilieged as they are now if this initiative succeeds. Seriously, tiny violin time people. Stop making excuses for your nasty, unpleasant industry. Just stop.
Pre 1970(ish) D28s were built with Brazilian rosewood back and sides which makes a hell of a difference. Modern reclaimed BRW is not of the same standard.
That said, personally I'll take a Collings over a 20s/30s Martin, but that's just me.
I would like to sell you this contract to buy my share in three days. Price: that of one unit of stock.
Also, most of the solutions here forget that you can sell stock anywhere, including under the shade of a buttonwood tree. Make the exchanges illiquid and people will just fuck off elsewhere.
I would be curious to know the proportion of nominally airgapped machines that in fact have storage devices, etc, inserted and removed regularly. The cynic in me says, quite high.
Yah, and I hope you told your insurer that you're dicking around with your car's electronics, because if not good luck getting coverage when you do kill someone.
Actually, constructing an argument at common law that the unwritten contract includes the photographer only doing what the subject might reasonably expect at the time it was taken would not be difficult or beyond the wit of the courts. As far as I know no-one's gone down this route yet.
Insurance never covers your whole costs - its an extremely important principle that insurance should never make the insured event as desirable as it not happening. Besides, crashes are not good for your passenger numbers.
Hi, care to present the calculations you did to establish statistical power? No? The please stop talking about statistics as if you understand the subject as opposed to parroting pop-stats bullshit.
The engineering would be impossibly gargantuan. A variant which is commonly suggested is the opposite, lubricating the plates to try and get a series of small earthquakes rather than one large one. This would be ideal *if* you could guarantee that you wouldn't simply trigger the big one.
The issue with the UK banks is aging IT infrastructure, an aging/retiring skills base and the enormous expense of transitioning to something future-proof.
Slashdot Mirror
Language changes.
Feminists tend not to make a fuss about homeless men because homeless men don't do a lot of oppressing. But more seriously, the issues you are talking about are entirely down to a patriarchical society and expecting men to behave and exist in a certain way in order to be culturally accepted. Get rid of that and maybe men might be better off as well.
Once you start adjusting for exposure, women tend to be far worse off. They are not gang members or drug dealers and clearup rates are higher because it's usually their boyfriends/husbands that kill them.
How is not receiving something you weren't receiving before "suffering"?
OMG the poor menz who are better paid and 82% of CS graduates might not be quite as privilieged as they are now if this initiative succeeds. Seriously, tiny violin time people. Stop making excuses for your nasty, unpleasant industry. Just stop.
That said, personally I'll take a Collings over a 20s/30s Martin, but that's just me.
You mean like we've been doing pretty much since the invention of measuring equipment?
If someone claims to be Napoleon, rational debate will not make him any less certain that he is a short and somewhat acquisitive European emperor.
Mods, this isn't trolling, it's a sensible question, one that I'd love to know the answer to.
If it comes from Bennett, RUN LIKE HELL.
Also, most of the solutions here forget that you can sell stock anywhere, including under the shade of a buttonwood tree. Make the exchanges illiquid and people will just fuck off elsewhere.
No, I don't think that is a reasonable expectation. Reasonable expectation is that of a dispassionate, rational person.
I would be curious to know the proportion of nominally airgapped machines that in fact have storage devices, etc, inserted and removed regularly. The cynic in me says, quite high.
Yah, and I hope you told your insurer that you're dicking around with your car's electronics, because if not good luck getting coverage when you do kill someone.
Actually, constructing an argument at common law that the unwritten contract includes the photographer only doing what the subject might reasonably expect at the time it was taken would not be difficult or beyond the wit of the courts. As far as I know no-one's gone down this route yet.
Insurance never covers your whole costs - its an extremely important principle that insurance should never make the insured event as desirable as it not happening. Besides, crashes are not good for your passenger numbers.
One question for ya. Are the people paying for SAR the same people who'd be paying for the trackers? Oh. Thought not.
One London council. There are about thirty of them covering different areas of Greater London.
Hi, care to present the calculations you did to establish statistical power? No? The please stop talking about statistics as if you understand the subject as opposed to parroting pop-stats bullshit.
They kept it quiet to try and find the rock before a collector did.
What do you think of Slashdot Beta?
Mass population screening is generally of limited value. Regular screening of at-risk groups is beneficial.
The engineering would be impossibly gargantuan. A variant which is commonly suggested is the opposite, lubricating the plates to try and get a series of small earthquakes rather than one large one. This would be ideal *if* you could guarantee that you wouldn't simply trigger the big one.
The issue with the UK banks is aging IT infrastructure, an aging/retiring skills base and the enormous expense of transitioning to something future-proof.
Oh lordy. So far off the map you're not even wrong.