Conveyancing in the UK can be done by anyone who does it correctly, if they have an interest in the property. Indeed, it's difficult to see how you could disallow this.
A stock is just a piece of property and can be sold in any venue. If (say) NYSE moved to one-second ticks, or one minute or one hour ticks, traders would simply meet elsewhere (under a buttonwood tree, perhaps) and trade there. Willing seller, willing buyer.
Ooh, that is a good one. Though I still think mine is dumber. Not that I'm a lawyer either; I just know enough to recognise when someone thinks they are...
No, the gender wage gap myth is a myth. Yes, large chunks of the gap can be explained, but not all of it. And the explanations themselves involve structural inequality; turtles all the way down.
As for your competition argument, lol. For many industries the compensation bill is not the largest part of the expense base and cultural friction is sufficient to overcome the competitive advantage of employing women & minorities.
One of these days I'm going to write a plugin that hides all posts online that contain the phrase "social justice warrior". You know nothing about feminism and you are behaving like a spoilt child.
The value of a degree is that it shows to an employer that you could get into a high value institution. That means the institution has no incentive either to expand provision or reduce fees (or indeed control costs at all). So unlikely to drop any time soon.
No. An idiot with a pointy stick, I can deal with. Unless he's particularly versed in the ancient art of stick-poking, I can probably put up a reasonable fight.
And he can't walk into a crowded bar and incinerate everyone with his pointed stick, either. I'm not concerned about pointed sticks. Assholes with flamethrowes: nope nope nope.
I really don't see what all the fuss is about. Delete the project and tell all involved to stop being dicks. Why does this need to generate so much bullshit?
"It is possible to debate this"/= "This is not settled science". Yes, I dare say you will be able to blether for as long as I can. But here's the thing. Science converges on the truth. Yes, it might be wrong. But by definition you cannot know better than the scientific consensus, especially not on something as well scrutinised as AGW. So, in short, you can shove your "scepticism" up your ass, because I don't care and your opinion is of no relevance.
Does climate change happen naturally? Yes? Is the current experience of climate change natural? No. This stuff isn't up for debate; it's as established science as evolution and planetary motion. Unlike evolution, though, there are a lot of people with a financial interest in the status quo and therefore strive (often honestly) to show that AGW is not true.
Slashdot Mirror
Conveyancing in the UK can be done by anyone who does it correctly, if they have an interest in the property. Indeed, it's difficult to see how you could disallow this.
More women have been killed by domestic violence since 9/11 than there were people killed on 9/11. Not just more. A *lot* more.
A stock is just a piece of property and can be sold in any venue. If (say) NYSE moved to one-second ticks, or one minute or one hour ticks, traders would simply meet elsewhere (under a buttonwood tree, perhaps) and trade there. Willing seller, willing buyer.
Ooh, that is a good one. Though I still think mine is dumber. Not that I'm a lawyer either; I just know enough to recognise when someone thinks they are...
Maybe we're just becoming better people.
A post more devoid of legal knowledge I have yet to see on Slashdot, and that's saying something.
Bullshit. It's big, but it's not difficult.
In some studies, in some cultures, most of which have been extensively criticised.
When I did my stats degree, we used the expression "confidence interval".
By the way, isn't the fact women have babies something of a net benefit to men?
Yup. Individuals can be dicks, sure. "Feminism"? No. Don't be stupid.
No, just people who are behaving like spoilt children - like you.
Why on earth do you need "top talent" to run a simple webserver and sell ad space? All they host is text, for heaven's sake.
As for your competition argument, lol. For many industries the compensation bill is not the largest part of the expense base and cultural friction is sufficient to overcome the competitive advantage of employing women & minorities.
One of these days I'm going to write a plugin that hides all posts online that contain the phrase "social justice warrior". You know nothing about feminism and you are behaving like a spoilt child.
Well, that's a fairly obvious consequence of banning the use of gender as a rating factor. Works the other way round in life insurance.
Wow. Enjoy being clueless, son. Clue: those things exist for a reason.
Depends what the cost of that lift is.
Yeah, this could never happen in an advanced country.
The value of a degree is that it shows to an employer that you could get into a high value institution. That means the institution has no incentive either to expand provision or reduce fees (or indeed control costs at all). So unlikely to drop any time soon.
And he can't walk into a crowded bar and incinerate everyone with his pointed stick, either. I'm not concerned about pointed sticks. Assholes with flamethrowes: nope nope nope.
Let me guess. Straight white male?
Thanks for telling gay people what to think. I'm sure they had no idea how they felt about this issue until you stepped up to the plate.
No. No, it really is the flamethrower that frightens me. If the asshole didn't have a flamethrower, I wouldn't be frightened.
It also doesn't work on the "continue to argue with an idiot when the conversation has moved on" principle.
I really don't see what all the fuss is about. Delete the project and tell all involved to stop being dicks. Why does this need to generate so much bullshit?
"It is possible to debate this" /= "This is not settled science". Yes, I dare say you will be able to blether for as long as I can. But here's the thing. Science converges on the truth. Yes, it might be wrong. But by definition you cannot know better than the scientific consensus, especially not on something as well scrutinised as AGW. So, in short, you can shove your "scepticism" up your ass, because I don't care and your opinion is of no relevance.
Does climate change happen naturally? Yes? Is the current experience of climate change natural? No. This stuff isn't up for debate; it's as established science as evolution and planetary motion. Unlike evolution, though, there are a lot of people with a financial interest in the status quo and therefore strive (often honestly) to show that AGW is not true.