It's perfectly obvious. Windows based systems _still_ don't have the ability to be administered over a simple communications path such as an analogue phone line and a VT100 terminal. This means that if something goes wrong, the sysadmin concerned has to get up and go to the machine itself, which after hours could prove a costly exercise (in both overtime and downtime costs).
There have been so many times I've managed to get a Un*x based system running again in minutes after a problem merely by using a mobile communicator with a VT100 emulator in it. I couldn't do that if it was running on Windows.
...and with the new DRM capabilities, it'll be able to do so much less.
So you believe that corporate rights overrule individual rights?
It's perfectly obvious. Windows based systems _still_ don't have the ability to be administered over a simple communications path such as an analogue phone line and a VT100 terminal. This means that if something goes wrong, the sysadmin concerned has to get up and go to the machine itself, which after hours could prove a costly exercise (in both overtime and downtime costs).
There have been so many times I've managed to get a Un*x based system running again in minutes after a problem merely by using a mobile communicator with a VT100 emulator in it. I couldn't do that if it was running on Windows.