Slashdot Mirror


One Year After September 11

One year ago today, at 9:12 eastern, we posted World Trade Towers and Pentagon Attacked amidst the events of that day. Since Slashdot is really just a discussion site, I felt the most appropriate way to handle this anniversary is to simply do just that. I hadn't read those stories since the day it happened, and I really am at a loss for words. But I'm sure many of you won't be. And thanks to OSDN for turning banner ads off for the day.

1,374 comments

  1. OSDN by oliverthered · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Umm... have you read the comments about OSDN turning off banner adds, there's very little thanks to be had, the first posts neer the bottom of the page make for the best read.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:OSDN by claude_juan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      some people were bitching about how osdn is using this "sacrifice" as a way to become a commercial hero. quite frankly, i think it is a nice gesture. what do people expect? them to save the world?

    2. Re:OSDN by GLX · · Score: 1

      and as an AP story put it, you're damned if you do, damned if you don't...

      If you advertise on 9/11, you're seen as insensitive and you don't care to acknowledge what happened one year ago.

      If you don't advertise, you're seen as pandering or sensationalist, and that someway somehow you should be recognized for your good deed of actually not advertising on the day of a national tragedy.

      Either way, we'd all find a way to bring up something negative. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    3. Re:OSDN by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      At least the OSDN banner link is really tasteful.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    4. Re:OSDN by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2

      exactly. neither in the ad, nor on the linked to page, does it say, "OSDN rocks, we are doing this for blah blah blah". a simple, tasteful campaign, and I'm for one glad they did it.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    5. Re:OSDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      halting commerce is not exactly a "good deed". the entire aim of the terrorism against this country was to halt commerce and bring down the economy (and therefore limit the amount of power the US government has). by not advertising on sept. 11, this sends the message that they won, even only if for a day.

      stopping progress to observe sept. 11 is ridiculous, almost as ridiculous as turning the entire WTC site into a memorial ground.

    6. Re:OSDN by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      Kudos to OSDN for that.

      Here in Dublin the cafe I went to for lunch had a minutes silence (they normally have music playing, kids screaming, etc.). It touched me, as it touched me back then.

      God bless y'all.

    7. Re:OSDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... and I thought the "discussions" on slashdot were uninformed, frothing, and pointless :) I now know better.

    8. Re:OSDN by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

      I personally see this as a very good gesture. It's good to see someone not milking cash out of this day like others.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
  2. Banners? by SealBeater · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    OSDN turned off the banners? I haven't seen a banner ad since I installed junkbuster.

    SealBeater

    --
    -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    1. Re:Banners? by SealBeater · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Right, my comment is off-topic when I reply directly to a statement made in the story.
      And thanks to OSDN for turning banner ads off for the day.
      Mods on crack.

      SealBeater

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    2. Re:Banners? by BilldaCat · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      It's offtopic because we don't give a flying fuck about you acting all cool because you use junkbuster. Fuck off.

      --
      BilldaCat
    3. Re:Banners? by Star+Stealing+Girl · · Score: 1

      Well, the banners may be off, but I'm still receieving spam mail in my inbox. . .can't these guys ever take a day off?

      --
      All my money went to Nigeria and all I got was this lousy sig. . .
    4. Re:Banners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like the mods didn't give a flying fuck about your comments either. Nooch.

    5. Re:Banners? by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2

      yes, but at least he didn't whine about it.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    6. Re:Banners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If spammers stop spamming, the terrorists will have already won.

      DENVER FOGHAT.

    7. Re:Banners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you think any1 is interested?

    8. Re:Banners? by Disevidence · · Score: 1

      You are so fucking cool.

      Now fuck off.

      --
      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  3. Freedom after 9/11 by cantherius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As America Remembers 9/11/2001, we must remember that we live in a country based on freedom. Those freedoms are being threatened right now because of America's reaction to 9/11, and we have to be careful about that.

    So please, as you mourn, see your friends and family, or watch TV all day (which I hope you don't do), try to remember what it is that we're fighting for in the first place, ok?

    Without those freedoms in tact.. there's nothing left to fight for.

    I love you guys, tho, and I'm glad it wasn't any of you who were lost a year ago :-)

    1. Re:Freedom after 9/11 by RiotXIX · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't been so sure...so many people bright tech. people died that some must have been slashdotters.

      --
      "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
    2. Re:Freedom after 9/11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The palestinians are hardly being oppressed by Isreal. They should be thankful that Israel, in all their non-muslim compassion, still allows the palestinians to exist at all.
      Of all the stateless ethnic/cultural groups in the world (tibetians, kurds, etc) the Palestinians are the most irresponsible, murderous, illogical and bloody, and the least deserving of a state or recognition. It is simply incredible that they've used terrorism to such an effect that otherwise reasonable people spout off like the Palestinians are victims.

    3. Re:Freedom after 9/11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 3 arabs in the Knesset. That's 3 more than in ALL OF THE OTHER ARAB COUNTRIES COMBINED.
      The Palestinians left their lands for money and promise of assistance by the arabs in the region (Jordan, Lebanon, et al.) Instead, they aren't welcome in these lands and cry about the land they either voluntarily waked away from or fought and lost.
      You don't hear me bitching about land in Ireland, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands or any other place of my ancestors becase WE LEFT THERE.
      Get over it.
      The Pali's cheered when innocents died. They still do. I feel no sadness for them and, in fact, would support wholesale eradication of their miserable asses.

      As for our form of government, it's a representative Republic. If you don't understand it, don't criticize it.
      Look at all of the weapons and energy companies that have gone out of business the last year. Boy, they really have the government in their pockets.
      Fucking Ignorant Third-World Loving Troll.

    4. Re:Freedom after 9/11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yes, but the tanks are compassion, whereas the stones are pure TERRAR.

    5. Re:Freedom after 9/11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the funniest comment i have ever read. Thank you.

    6. Re:Freedom after 9/11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The palestians lost their land when gaza and west bank was invaded, in the same way as Iraq invaded kuwait.

    7. Re:Freedom after 9/11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you give me any numbers on these failed businesses, and the reason why they failed ? I'll give you a reason : corruption ...

  4. flags at half mast... by jptxs · · Score: 2, Redundant

    They just lowered the two flags outside my office window to half mast. The US flag and the NJ state flag. I didn't expect that. I just keep trying very hard not to cry, and that's making it harder. Technology seems very trivial this morning.

    --
    we speak the way we breathe --Fugazi
    1. Re:flags at half mast... by markbthomas · · Score: 1

      I think flags almost everywhere are at half mast today.

      I work at IBM laboratories in the United Kingdom, and the blue IBM flag on the main building is at half mast today.

      I think most of the state flags in London will be at half-mast (except the Queen's flag at the palace, which is only at half mast when the monarch dies).

    2. Re:flags at half mast... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      except the Queen's flag at the palace, which is only at half mast when the monarch dies

      IIRC it was flown at half-mast on Sept 11 of last year...

    3. Re:flags at half mast... by funkman · · Score: 2

      It is supposed to be at half-mast today. Press release from Education Dept

    4. Re:flags at half mast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something important to remember: flags are truly never lowered to half mast. They are raised to half mast.

      The half-mast flag is symbolic of having the flag *higher* than it should be, not lower. It's a symbol of glory, not a cry for pity, or a show of weakness.

  5. TV coverage feels wrong by teslatug · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone else feel that it is wrong for the media to cover this story so in depth, and ultimately make money on those that died and their families. I have decided not to watch any coverage. I remember very well what happened. Is any station doing coverage without any comercials? Or at least, is there one that is donating the amount they're making above what they usually do?

    1. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      none of the major networks are running commercials. cnn, nbc, abc, cbs, msnbc, espn, etc.

    2. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by GiorgioG · · Score: 1

      Yes, I believe foxnews is going commercial free all day. Or it's CNN - it's definitely one of those two if not both.

    3. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      WNBC (New York) is showing the ceremonies without any commercials.

    4. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get your hopes up. Some folks think "Business as Usual" shows that the terrorist didn't "win" (Oh, and btw, they can keep making money). Others want a "Sign of Respect". Can't have it both ways. Besides, you can even buy freaking souviners on site... tacky as hell, but, well, that's how some people are.

    5. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> Is any station doing coverage without any comercials?

      NPR

    6. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by squaretorus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's the one-up-manship of the various channels that gets to me. I remember flicking to the BBC coverage just after the second plane hit and seeing the first of the 'backdrops' with the smoking towers and the 'Sept 11 2001: Attack on America' line and thinking "there we go - branding the story already - who will be first to use the towers as the number 11 I wonder??"

      I think it is the speedy turnaround of these 'visuals' that is disconcerting. I'd much rather just have the video feed, and a guy in a studio saying 'holey shit' than a million glossy flaping flags with the towers in the background.

      It really did feel a little too much like a Chris Morris stunt, a live edition of Brasseye.

      I think /. did a great job in just getting the news out there. None of the hype, the gloss, the panic to fly presenters to stand in front of the ruins. Just simple stories to keep everyone up to date.

    7. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get your hopes up. Some folks think "Business as Usual" shows that the terrorist didn't "win" (Oh, and they can also keep making money). Others want a "Sign of Respect". Can't have it both ways. Besides, you can even buy freaking souviners on site... tacky as hell, but, well, that's how some people are - anything for a buck.

    8. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by mooneyguy · · Score: 1

      I've been watching CNN coverage since 8:40 this morning. (Hey, it's part of my job, okay?) Not a single commercial. And ads have been pulled from cnn.com as well. In place of the ads are pictures of candles. America is mourning and remembering. The media is covering it. Why is that bad?

      --
      Mooney Guy N4074H
    9. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by wjyoung · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about public television and radio stations (PBS, NPR). They're ad-free every day. I feel their coverage is generally of higher calibre because their funds come from donations of people like me, not advertisers. (ok once in a while you have to listen to a "funded in part by Company X", but not too often.)

    10. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by zoombat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fox is going commercial free for 24 hours.

    11. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by misfit13b · · Score: 1
      I dunno about TV since I'm at work, but WEEI - a sports talk radio station here in Boston - is going commercial free and changing their format from sports talk to talk radio for the day.

      aside: I'm sitting here in my office, and it's dead quiet. An announcement was made about an hour ago over the PA for a moment of silence, and I haven't heard or spoken a word since. Chilling.

      Anyway, I know what you mean about the TV coverage, FOX cable news (one example) has been one of the worst (IMHO). I recently removed all cable news from my TV tuner but for CNN which I thought seemed to be the least (for lack of a better term) sleazy about their coverage.

      Anyone here agree/disagree? What stations coverage, if any, do you see as the most levelheaded?

      Peace to you all, m13b

    12. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by retards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, so don't ever watch any specials about Hiroshima or the Bombing of Dresden either (which both had a LOT more casualties, almost all civilian). Oh, but these were Americans that were killed, so this is different...

    13. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by southpolesammy · · Score: 2

      Who's watching TV here? I dunno about you, but I'm reading posts on Slashdot right now.

      At least the S:N ratio is probably higher here than on the tube....maybe....

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    14. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Coplan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm not watching TV either...but that's not why.

      I feel the need to do my normal routine today. Yes, it's the day we observe 9-11, but it should also be the day that we start to get back to normal lives. We're well on our way...but the economy is still affected, and the world is still mourning.

      I'm not watching TV because I don't feel the need to relive such events. I don't want to see those images again. I would rather see stories about the future. I would rather see a story about what's going to be built in its place. And I would like to see a story about what the businesses are doing, where they moved to, and how they're making out. But I can't expect that from the coverage. For the five minutes I watched...I saw images of the towers falling again, I saw a story of the sorrow a woman felt. I don't want to see that stuff...I've seen it, and while I can't forget it, I don't want to relive it.

      I'm sure that many people agree.

    15. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by siphoncolder · · Score: 1

      You're right - it DOES feel wrong, and even a bit shady. Think about what's been going on in the last 48 hours in America: right on time for the anniversary, the media reports how the "terror level" the gov't uses has been upped a notch. Then all the repeat coverage and hatred of bin Laden being inflamed, and what do you get? A nation (nay, continent) full of unease & unrest, people feeling nervous and fearful. It's really getting a lot of people worked up all over again, and casting a bad shadow on what's supposed to be a day of remembrance.

      I live in Toronto, Ontario (Canada), and what does one of our newspapers emblazon on the cover? In big bold letters, with a picture of a dark day over the CN Tower: "TARGET: TORONTO", and some text explaining how people feel that Toronto is the next target for terrorists. Just more fuel for the fear fire.

      September 11 2001 was a great tragedy. Too bad it took that to make people realize that it's a big world and shit can happen, without there being anything you can do.

      (Or have people even realized that at all?)

      --
      i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
    16. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by JeffryG138 · · Score: 1

      I don't watch T.V. - but last night I was at the gym alone in an empty line of treadmills and in front of me was a line of five televisions, all tuned to different channels. Each of them were showing scenes from 9/11/01. Or, seemingly round-robin, commercials. I think the thing that strikes me so much is the "branding" of the tragedy. Every station has it's own style of logo-art (including ABC witht the 11 as towers...) and graphics and music. What demented little art school twits design this stuff? How do you get convinced that this is a viable way to make a living? Seems like it all started with the CNN kettle-drum, James Earl Jones "WAR IN THE GULF". The news seems to be about cheesey images and slogans... "a nation mourns... a nation remembers" Does anybody else seem to see a line blurring between news and entertainment? Maybe because news is so mixed with advertising in the form of CASINO ON THE WEB, and X-10 moving flash horseshit now that people don't notice...

    17. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Yes,

      There is nothing new to be covered here. Why not go on and be done with it? It is depressing to watch.

    18. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PBS ad free? You obviously haven't watch PBS since Sesame Street. They definitely have ad spots between shows. They just happen to come from "donor" companies instead of ad clients.

    19. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm...let's see
      Dresden - Oh that's right the Germans were at war with the US and committing genocide against an entire race of people. Fuck 'em.

      Hiroshima and Nagasaki - Wait, they were busy trying to enslave all of Asia and had already attacked us on Dec 7th, 1941 at a little old place called Pearl Harbor.

      These two instances were direct results of war. We were at war when they occurred, millions had already died before them. Fuck 'em.

      When you are sitting at home wacking it to pr0n and I come in and blow your fucking brains out it is different than if we are on opposing sides in a war. And in war everyone dies, civilians, military, children, little bunnies, you name it.

      So fucking get used to it because war is hell.

    20. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I've been able to tell, Fox does not carry any News programming.

    21. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Stween · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think in fairness the BBC did a very good job on september the 11th. So they have a consistent image, a certain on-screen look and layout they like to keep going most of the time, and there's nothing wrong with that. Its far from in-your-face, things are kept clear.

      They have the technology there to quickly come up with those screens and backdrops, its not like on a major event like that they'd forget everything and just repeat the few pieces of footage they had ad-finitum (although they did plenty of that too, because they didn't have much to go on to start with). So they put a banner up saying something like 'twin towers attack'. What else were they meant to do?

      Its a rarity that the BBC can be accused of hyping anything. If you want to be cynical about it, they don't hype much because they won't see the same financial gain from doing so as a commercial television operator.

    22. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Stween · · Score: 1

      I feel the need to do my normal routine today. Yes, it's the day we observe 9-11, but it should also be the day that we start to get back to normal lives. We're well on our way...but the economy is still affected, and the world is still mourning.

      I'd just like to point out that the markets were already tumbling before 9/11 (to use the US form of writing dates). I'm not saying the attacks didn't spur further downward trends in the stockmarkets, it simply added to the effects.

      The markets are till unstable at this moment in time, but that's more to do with major scandals like Enron at this point in time than the terrorist attacks on the states a year ago.

    23. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by SilverSun · · Score: 1

      Dresden - Oh that's right the Germans were at war with the US and committing genocide against an entire race of people. Fuck 'em.


      Read the original post again. The people killed in Dresden were civilians, refugees. And, as a matter of fact, the war was already over at that time. Some people say (and I heard this from a US citizen) US didn't want valuable german technologie to fall into russian hands (FYI Dresden is in the former GDR), and was time was short and the red army already there, they just blew it away.

      Cheers from Dresden,
      Peter

      BTW: Anyway, Germany can be _very_ happy that US freed Germany from the Nazi regime. I don't want to imagine what ould have happened if they just tried to impose some embargo, or send 'inspectors'.

      --

      KdenLive/PIAVE - non-linear video editing

    24. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by uncleFester · · Score: 2

      Perhaps the best place to watch anything might be C-Span. Practically no pundits, no spin, no drool-at-the-mouth commentators talking over every single fscking thing and making themselves part of the event.

      Having said that.. I'm only watching the Pentagon ceremony. I refuse to support or endorse any of the other tasteless 'tributes' from every media outlet today. For me, this should be a day to reflect, show some reverence and strengthen our resolve. IMHO, none of the coverage will do any of this.

      I am proud and thankful of the freedoms this country affords me but sickened and ashamed of the so-called 'mainstream press' (on both sides.. I am bipartisan on my distain :) and what they do with those freedoms.

      --
      -'fester
    25. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could it be because just as the US goes to war with Germany, Japan convieniently declares war on the US? What if the allies really needed the US to win (which people will debate all day long here, so i'll leave it at what if) and they had to put all their attention on defending the US.. Where would Europe be? The fact is that all of Europe was at stake, and probaby the world. MUCH was at stake.

      Japan declared war on the US at very dangerous time, and the answer was a bomb. They were told to surrender, which they did not, and a second bomb was dropped.

      Don't get me wrong, I think it's horrendous, but I don't blame the US for Japan attacking them, nor do I blame the US for Japan not surrendering to prevent the second bomb.

    26. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by CrazyJoel · · Score: 1

      "who will be first to use the towers as the number 11 I wonder?"

      Well, channel 11 in New York, WPIX, used the WTC as the number 11 for years.

      PIX! PIX! PIX!

      --

      Such is the infinite Grace of Popeye.
    27. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by mojotek · · Score: 1

      "FOX cable news (one example) has been one of the worst (IMHO). I recently removed all cable news from my TV tuner but for CNN...

      I can't stand Fox News, in my opinion they embody all that is wrong with the media today. Every story has a political slant... each "reporter" is just a shock-jock of the talking head circuit. They think by making every story (whether news worthy or not) sensationalistic, that they are fulfilling their jobs as media outlets for the public. And sensationalizing wasn't thrown out the door for the events of Sept. 11th either.

      As I remember, they were the first to show stock footage of Palestinians chanting in the streets and burning American flags. I say 'stock' to mean it occured in the early nineties. Most people (including myself) took this as live footage... which just added fuel to the fire.

      I could go on and on about Fox, but the real problem lies elsewhere... the target demographic for Shepard Smith, Neil Cavuto, John Gibson, etc. is the same audience that watches soaps and Fox's "When Animals Attack Over and Over and Over Again".

    28. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by perlyking · · Score: 2

      11th september 2001 - the day a nation forgot how to format dates.
      /me observes a minutes silence.

      --
      no sig.
    29. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by ergo98 · · Score: 1
      I live in Toronto, Ontario (Canada), and what does one of our newspapers emblazon on the cover? In big bold letters, with a picture of a dark day over the CN Tower: "TARGET: TORONTO", and some text explaining how people feel that Toronto is the next target for terrorists.

      I saw that paper (one of the trash rags that I don't actually read) and was astounded, especially when you read the subtext that states "If a terrorist attacks Canada, most of a poll respondents believe that they would hit Toronto": Well that's just a stunning bit of the astoundingly obvious there. I can help them out if they have branches around the world:

      • TARGET BRITAIN: London!
      • TARGET FRANCE: Paris!


      Mind you, I see nothing whatsoever wrong with news stations continuing to do what they do (with commercials and all). I mean, if you take commercials off the air, haven't you let the terrorist win? I'm actually playing on a common bunch of BS there, but really I don't see what the problem with networks doing what they do, if they're providing the information that people seek (for instance: One newscaster mentioned that people complained that they kept showing scary images on 2001-09-11-> Turn off the friggin' TV!).

      September 11 2001 was a great tragedy. Too bad it took that to make people realize that it's a big world and shit can happen, without there being anything you can do.

      I've seen a lot of comments, especially from people around the world, saying things along the lines of "yeah, well people die all the time: Get over it!". The WTC attack, and I single it out from the Pentagon for a reason, was unlike any attack that the West had ever seen: It hit everyday Joe, where he works (and where he lives), in peacetime. Because of this, the effect to all of us was dramatic (it put the serious bejebus' into hundreds of millions of people, as is generally the desire of terrorists). I would say, with pretty good sincerity, that this would not be even remotely as big of a deal if a US military installation were blown up with 3000 soldiers lost (PLEASE NOTE BEFORE YOU RANT OFF AT ME: I am not saying that that would not be a big deal-> It would be a huge deal, and would likely have also led to a country getting their asses kicked, but nothing like the effects of 9/11), because we could all separate ourselves from it and depersonalize it.
    30. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2

      As far as I've been able to tell, Fox does not carry any News programming.

      If this whole business weren't so damned depressing, your post would have me laughing.

      My wife and I both took the morning off from work to be at home together, and watch Dan Rather on CBS, because that's what we did last year.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    31. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm not watching TV because I ....

      I'm not watching TV becuase it is crap.

    32. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by flagstone · · Score: 1
      At least the S:N ratio is probably higher here than on the tube....maybe....
      Not really...you just don't have a (-1) filter on your TV.
      --
      These people have looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    33. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      I remember the coverage from September 11. I didn't get to see much on TV, because I was at work. They let everyone who wanted to go home out that day. I worked in a quiet business park, and I just walked around it for hours - not knowing what to do.

      Many people said things, but the best words I heard were from Jon Stewart of the Daily Show, from the first episode they aired after the attack.

      Read Jon's Speech

      Good evening and welcome to "The Daily Show." We are back. This is our first show since the tragedy in New York City. There is no other way really to start this show than to ask you at home the question that we've asked the audience here tonight and that we've asked everybody that we know here in New York since September 11th, and that is, "Are you okay?" We pray that you are and that your family is. I'm sorry to do this to you. It's another entertainment show beginning with an overwrought speech of a shaken host. TV is nothing, if not redundant. So, I apologize for that. It's something that unfortunately, we do for ourselves so that we can drain whatever abscess is in our hearts and move onto the business of making you laugh, which we really haven't been able to do very effectively lately. Everyone's checked in already, I know we're late. I'm sure we're getting in right under the wire before the cast of "Survivor" offers their insight into what to do in these situations.

      They said to get back to work. There were no jobs available for a man in the fetal position under his desk crying, which I would have gladly taken. So I came back here. Tonight's show is obviously not a regular show. We looked through the vaults, we found some clips that we thought might make you smile, which is really what's necessary, I think, right about now. A lot of folks have asked me, "What are you going to do when you get back? What are you going to say?" I mean, what a terrible thing to have to do. I don't see it as a burden at all. I see it as a privilege. I see it as a privilege and everyone here does see it that way. The show in general, we feel like is a privilege. Just even the idea that we can sit in the back of the country and make wise cracks, which is really what we do. We sit in the back and we throw spitballs, but never forgetting the fact that is a luxury in this country that allows us to do that. This is a country that allows for open satire, and I know that sounds basic and it sounds as though it goes without saying - but that's really what this whole situation is about. It's the difference between closed and open. It's the difference between free and burden and we don't take that for granted here by any stretch of the imagination and our show has changed. I don't doubt that. What it's become, I don't know. "Subliminable" is not a punch line anymore. One day it will become that again, and Lord willing, it will become that again because that means we have ridden out the storm.

      But the main reason that I wanted to speak tonight is not to tell you what the show is going to be. Not to tell you about all the incredibly brave people that are here in New York and in Washington and around the country. But we've had an unenduring pain here - an unendurable pain. I wanted to tell you why I grieve, but why I don't despair...I'm sorry. Luckily we can edit this. One of my first memories is of Martin Luther King being shot. I was five and if you wonder if this feeling will pass...When I was five, he was shot. Here's what I remember about it. I was in a school in Trenton. They shut the lights off and we got to sit under our desks and we thought that was really cool and they gave us cottage cheese, which was a cold lunch because there was rioting, but we didn't know that. We just thought that "My god. We get to sit under our desks and eat cottage cheese." That's what I remember about it. That was a tremendous test of this country's fabric and this country's had many tests before that and after that.

      The reason I don't despair is because this attack happened. It's not a dream. But the aftermath of it, the recovery is a dream realized. And that is Martin Luther King's dream. Whatever barriers we've put up are gone even if it's momentary. We're judging people by not the color of their skin but the content of their character. You know, all this talk about "These guys are criminal masterminds. They've gotten together and their extraordinary guile...and their wit and their skill." It's a lie. Any fool can blow something up. Any fool can destroy. But to see these guys, these firefighters, these policemen and people from all over the country, literally, with buckets rebuilding. That's extraordinary. That's why we've already won. It's light. It's democracy. We've already won. They can't shut that down. They live in chaos and chaos...it can't sustain itself. It never could. It's too easy and it's too unsatisfying.

      The view from my apartment was the World Trade Center and now it's gone. They attacked it. This symbol of American ingenuity and strength and labor and imagination and commerce and it is gone. But you know what the view is now? The Statue of Liberty. The view from the south of Manhattan is now the Statue of Liberty. You can't beat that.

      So we're going to take a break and I'm going to stop slobbering on myself and on the desk. We're going to get back to this. It's gonna be fun and funny and it's going to be the same as it was and I thank you. We'll be right back.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    34. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by n-baxley · · Score: 2

      NPR has commercial free coverage, but then that's not out of the ordinary for them.

    35. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Wateshay · · Score: 1

      Well, this is a little off-topic, but I don't think you've quite got your facts straight there. Japan attacked the US first, while we were still a neutral party (at least as far as actual military involvement goes--we were providing arms to Britain). We didn't go to war with Germany until they declared war on us, a few days after we declared war on Japan in responce to the Pearl Harbor attacks.

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    36. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 2

      No, I disagree. The media's job is to report the news. In the USA, the biggest news today is obviously the 9/11 anniversary.

      And -- by the way -- people can watch what they want to see. Advertising rates are determined by viewership totals. It's a fairly effective form of democracy. The news channels must display the news that we care about; otherwise, they will be unable to make ends meet.

    37. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      I liked the words of Ryan Bliss, creator of Digital Blasphemy.

      Quite a few people have written asking if I was going to post a wallpaper commerating September 11, 2001. The answer is yes, and no. Those of you who have been visiting my gallery for a while might remember that September 11 is my birthday (I won't blame you if you've forgotten), and that I've always posted a new wallpaper on my birthday.

      I'm going to try to have something new this year as well (I'll be 31), but I'm pretty sure it won't be related to last year's terrorist attacks. Those who desire such commemorative materials will not have far to look, I'm sure. Personally, I think it is time we move forward and I would rather work to that end.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    38. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Dannon · · Score: 2

      Anyone else feel that it is wrong for the media to cover this story so in depth, and ultimately make money on those that died and their families.

      No, I don't. For three reasons.

      One. I believe very strongly in the freedom of the press. A recent survey on Americans' desire in freedom showed that many people now feel that the Bill of Rights protects us -too much- from government... and that Freedom of the Press is one of the least popular rights we have. Remember this: Where there is no freedom of press, you generally find a totalitarian government.

      Two. There are viewers that want coverage. There are viewers that want to see the speeches, view the replays, and relive the memory of that moment when they first heard the news. I'll likely avoid most of the coverage, but I did listen to my usual thirty-minutes-of-radio during my morning commute. I would find it fulfilling, I think, if I could re-listen to the radio broadcast as I heard it that morning, but I'm sure I'm not going to get the chance. You have the right to avoid it if you wish. You also have the right to express your opinion against it. I would entreat you against any measures to deny other viewers of what they wish to view.

      Finally, I believe that honest profit is not a crime. Yes, I believe wholeheartedly in honest capitalism. If, by their broadcasts, they are depriving any of the victims or their families of life, liberty, or property, then they are doing wrong. Otherwise, they are doing a service to their viewers, and possibly even to said victims and families, by being preserving and spreading those memories. Any profit they make is nothing more than a measure of the value of that service.

      There may be some broadcasters who wish to do without profits today. There may be others who, as you say, will donate at least a portion of their proceeds to charity. That is their right. It is their money. I'll give a nod of respect to those executives willing to make such a choice, but I won't scold those who don't.

      --
      Good judgment comes from experience.
      Experience comes from bad judgment.
    39. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Prionux · · Score: 1

      Oh come on... people would be complaining whether they did cover Sep. 11th or if they treated it as a normal day. Frankly, I'm glad that they are doing what they are doing. Today is not a normal day for any of us in the United States, nor will this date be "just another day" for hopefully the rest of my life. As far as the argument that "They're just making money off this" is concerned... that is what these guys do for a living. If you don't like it, you don't have to watch it...

    40. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Dannon · · Score: 2

      Many kudos to Jon for that speech.

      I still remember the first Saturday Night Live after the attack. Rudy Giuliani appeared, along with some of the FDNY heroes.

      Giuliani spoke of how important it was to get on with life, with the daily routine, in spite of the pain. How people had to return to their jobs, and live on.

      Lorne Michaels: Does that mean we can be funny tonight?
      Rudy Giuliani: Why start now?

      --
      Good judgment comes from experience.
      Experience comes from bad judgment.
    41. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Ringlord · · Score: 1

      You can't really compare those bombings in a war with a terrorist act in peacetime. While all are tragedies the terrorist act is in a way more shocking because people are so unprepared for a sudden attack of this kind. In a war people (sort of) expects tragedies to happen.

      However, you are probably right when implying that the TV coverage would be less if people of another nationality were killed. I would bet that if this had happened in Kuala Lumpur a year ago, the commentaries on TV would be more like 'One year ago 3.500 people were killed in Kuala Lumpur. Now, over to George with the lastest results from Premier League'!

      Take care.

  6. mandela on iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/2251067.stm

    1. Re:mandela on iraq by GiorgioG · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      One of the world's most respected statesmen, Nelson Mandela, has condemned United States intervention in the Middle East as "a threat to world peace".

      World Peace is a myth. There has always been war somewhere in the world. If it wasn't for the USA's help, the world would be a much worse place. I'm tired of seeing many people hate the USA for whatever reason(s) they have and yet I look at their clothes and see Levis, Nike, etc. I look at their music and I see them trying to imitate the american style. It disgusts me to say that I have met people (of middle eastern descent) in France who were proud of 9/11 (so I was told after meeting them). Hypocracy is rampant in our world. People only believe what they are spoonfed by the media or their religious leaders. I wish people would learn to analyze the information they are fed.

    2. Re:mandela on iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I wish the US would learn to analyze the information they are fed.

    3. Re:mandela on iraq by GiorgioG · · Score: 1

      And for the record, the reason that most countries in Europe don't ever really support any military action in the Middle East is because they have heap of middle eastern immigrants & descendants and they don't want to stir up trouble in their own countries. i.e. France. Having lived there, (also being a citizen of US & France), I can tell you that many of the younger generations of middle easterners (algeriens) like to cause a rukus. I hate stereotypes, but this one applies. Even in the small city where my relatives live in, I hear about random car burnings, garbages being lit on fire, etc, muggings, general harassment. People won't go out after 8pm. I thought things were bad in the US with respect to the "inner" cities, but this is awful. So in a sense, I know why they never support the US. In another sense, their politicians are pussies. People in this world have become complacent. "Don't touch my stuff, and you can do as you please." More and more we're seeing the repercusions of this mindset. I'm not saying that this doesn't exist in the US, hell, when was the last 60s-style political march in the USA? And no, the (0.5*)million man march doesn't count.

    4. Re:mandela on iraq by tekninja · · Score: 1

      Nice.

      I dont think 'Nike' and 'Levi' should sybolize a nations worth. America is most surely in a serious decline. Economially. Socially. Look at our familys. Look at our buisnesses. Look at our schools. Compare them to a nation such as Japan, and then tell me who is to be emulated.

    5. Re:mandela on iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at our familys. Look at our buisnesses.

      Look at our spelling.

      Compare them to a nation such as Japan, and then tell me who is to be emulated.

      Japan has been in the toilet for over 10 years. Where have you been?

    6. Re:mandela on iraq by GiorgioG · · Score: 1

      "I dont think 'Nike' and 'Levi' should sybolize a nations worth."

      It doesn't. I'm saying people in the world pick & choose what parts of America are 'cool'.

      "America is most surely in a serious decline. Economially. Socially. Look at our familys. Look at our buisnesses. Look at our schools.""

      And just look at our spelling =)

      Really though, the world as a whole has been in an economic downswing. Personally I wouldn't want to be packed on an island like in a can of sardines.

      "Compare them to a nation such as Japan, and then tell me who is to be emulated."

      Why emulate anyone? Do your thing, we'll be fine Thanks.

    7. Re:mandela on iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Japan has been in the toilet for over 10 years. Where have you been?

      I've been shitting in the bushes and wiping my ass with japanese green tea leaves.

  7. Never Forget by NETHED · · Score: 1

    The scoundreles that inflicted so much pain cannot hurt us any more, but we must find it in our hearts to forgive them.

    We will never forget 9/11/01, but holding a grudge against a people is counter productive if we are really trying for World Peace.

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Never Forget by tilleyrw · · Score: 0
      A grudge may be counter productive but let's carpet-bomb Afghanistan with napalm. Then we can roast weenies as the sandmonkies burn.

      Peace through aggression.

      --
      This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
    2. Re:Never Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sure you'd be such the bleeding heart if your family and friends were among the dead...you'd be howling for blood just like the rest of em....

    3. Re:Never Forget by drxenos · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      are there pink, fluffy clouds in your world, too?

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    4. Re:Never Forget by ppluta · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You better be interested in finding forgiveness for yourself in the hearts of citzens of Serbia, Somalia, Vietnam, Iraq, and any other place you carry your napalm to.

    5. Re:Never Forget by sjlutz · · Score: 1
      You Say Forgive?
      Here's a little something for you:

      In a recent interview, General Norman
      Schwartzkopf was asked if he didn't think
      there was room for forgiveness toward the
      people who have harbored and abetted the
      terrorists who perpetrated the 9/11 attacks
      on America.
      His answer was classic Schwartzkopf. He
      said, "I believe that forgiving them is God's
      function. Our job is simply to arrange the
      meeting."


      Ok, it's an urban legand now, but pretty much still relates my feelings a year later.
    6. Re:Never Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you forgotten...

      THEY WANT TO KILL US!!!

      You can wish for World Peace all you want. The attacks of 9/11/01 prove that only way these individuals (terrorists) will achieve peace with us is when we are all dead.

      They don't want to talk / negotiate. They want to kill. Wake up before it's too late.

    7. Re:Never Forget by Gruturo · · Score: 2

      The scoundreles that inflicted so much pain cannot hurt us any more, but we must find it in our hearts to forgive them. We will never forget 9/11/01, but holding a grudge against a people is counter productive if we are really trying for World Peace

      Sure. World Peace. After the last one of them is erased.

      --

      Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule.
    8. Re:Never Forget by AppyPappy · · Score: 2
      The scoundreles that inflicted so much pain cannot hurt us any more

      At least until the next time.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    9. Re:Never Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny (ironic funny) given that a large number of relatives of the 9/11 victims are asking forgiveness. Most of the hawks who demand blood are people like you who didn't even know any of the victims.

    10. Re:Never Forget by ccarr.com · · Score: 1

      Forgiveness is unwise until the wrongdoer is either repentant or rendered incapable of further wrongdoing (read: killed). They tried to kill me, and they are still trying to kill me.

      If they saw the light and apologized and undertook not to do it again, then we can have a meaningful discussion of forgiveness. But frankly, that possibility is a bit too hypothetical for me.

      Perhaps the poster meant that we should forgive Muslims or Arabs. On that score, there is nothing to forgive. My own hatred is restricted to the specific men who planned and executed these attacks. The poster who mentioned American napalm would do well to maintain such a distinction. There is a wide gulf in moral culpability between terrorists and private citizens whose government acts reprehensively. The 9/11 attacks targeted private citizens.

      --
      I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve. BB
    11. Re:Never Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amusing how you think i dont have any friends or family that died...continue to close your eyes tight and not let the truth in..keep seeing your happy little tress and clouds so you wont see your own killer come up to you & your rights being ripped away

    12. Re:Never Forget by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 1
      Dude
      That's a bumper sticker waiting to happen.
      My personal favorite thought regarding 9/11 comes from John McCain.

      "We're coming to get you. God my forgive you....we WILL NOT."

      --

    13. Re:Never Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Forgiving bin laden is God's responsibility.


      Arranging the meeting is our responsibility.


      The United States Marines

  8. Interesting thoughts on the anniversary by cyb3r0ptx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some thoughts on this day of "rememberance" ca be found here and here. Another interesting thing is that all the major networks have decided to not show advertisements out of "respect". The truth is that they can't sell the time so they put a nice spin on it.

    1. Re:Interesting thoughts on the anniversary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think very little time is spent on thinking of the reasoning behind advertising or the lack of it and current world events such as 9-11 or as we call it downunder 11-9. I'm happy some people are looking further into things then the end of their own nose.

    2. Re:Interesting thoughts on the anniversary by G-funk · · Score: 2

      And of course nobody thinks to cover the fact that America's response to this act is to simply escalate its attacks on the enemies of israel^H^H^H^H^H^H freedom, and escelating the problem... Every time a Bin Laden is martyred, a hundred will rise to take his place. If he dies of old age, perhaps your children will too.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:Interesting thoughts on the anniversary by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase the X-Files movie: Kill Bin Laden and you risk turning one man's quest into a crusade. (Originally said about Fox Mulder)

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
  9. US Response by mary_will_grow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a question I hear around the office all day long. How does the american public at large, or in this case, the slashdot community, feel about the response America has had to the attack on september 11th?
    I personally feel we are continuing to provoke such things through our economic agenda, and that what bush's policy has been shortsighted and really retro-active. Others feel that the world climate is changing for the worst, and we simply need to start protecting ourselves more. What do you think?

    --
    Why stick up for big business?
    1. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To much "protection" and it becomes oppression... Then Americans will start bombing their own stuff.

    2. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, from here in Europe, the image of the US is worse now than it was before 9/11. Also, I have yet to see any TV reports about the US understanding why it happened, on the contrary, I saw a woman in a documentary saying "will we ever know why"...huh ?? It seems like there is no real debate over there, just flag waving and "towel head bashing"...correct me if I'm wrong ! Maybe instead of the World joining the US, the US should start thinking about joining the rest of the World.

    3. Re:US Response by Badanov · · Score: 0, Troll

      The best way to protect the USA is to provide economic oppotunities and to keep routes of trade open. Can't do either of those things under the threat of terrorism. That the US is increasing its problems with the world by respinding to terrorism with military force is just another subtle way of blaming the victim.

      --
      Dawn of the Dead
    4. Re:US Response by mary_will_grow · · Score: 0

      I think the middle east has been the victim of imperialism for many years, and although their actions are certainly not justified, they seem to me to be a natural human (note: _not_ HUMANE) response to the economic oppression they have been living under for decades.

      --
      Why stick up for big business?
    5. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. /me == another_non_american

    6. Re:US Response by SweenyTod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      After the initial attack, I was quite afraid that the US would start carpet bombing everybody they didn't like. Their attack on Afganistan shows just how determined you guys are, to extract a measure of vengance, which honestly, I don't blame at all.

      One year on, I'm a bit less afraid, but not by a lot. I fear the US will drag the world into a big fucking war in the middle east we'll live to regret. The alternative I suppose is to not attack, and probably let some of these countries that sponser terrorism develop big arse weapons, which we'll regret too.

      I dunno - a tough call, but I can't believe going to war is the only answer. The trouble is I don't know what the right answer is.

      --
      Alas gallinaceas de urbe bovis volo
    7. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, just a citizen of the world trying to make sense of what he sees & hears. religeon is belief without doubt, science is only doubt.

    8. Re:US Response by CrazyDuke · · Score: 2

      I was surprised that so many people in the US besides me where shocked that this could happen at all. I lived in the US controlled part Berlin during the cold war and acts of "terrorism" where all to common. Public buildings and trains blowing up... oh wait, they never told you that did they? I'm furious that what happend on 9/11 is being used as an excuse to make citizens spread their butt cracks a little wider.

      I consider Tyrany a bigger threat than terrorism.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    9. Re:US Response by GiorgioG · · Score: 1

      Any which way you slice it, the Middle East will end up in a big fucking war. Why? Lets say Iraq (since it's the most visible target these days) gets Nukes. What are they going to do with them? Survey says: Hit Israel. They respond with Nukes, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, et al respond with conventional weapons, Israel responds with an ass kicking by the aid of the US. Anyone ever consider why most of the other nations in the middle east oppose an Iraq regime change? Pure & Simple: Lets say we give Iraqies a taste of democracy (the right to vote, etc). Well, word will spread to Saudi Arabia ("Yeah, why don't we have this here?") The "Royal" families that rule many of these countries would be in deep shit.

      I was re-reading one of the 9/11/01 posts on /. a few minutes ago that simply states: "BOMB THOSE BASTARDS BACK TO THE STONEAGE!" The problem is, they are still IN the stoneage culturally & politically. If the regimes/media in those nations can create hatred among the people of the US/democracy, then it stands to reason they won't have to worry about that in their country.

    10. Re:US Response by lamz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I fear the US will drag the world into a big fucking war in the middle east we'll live to regret.

      There is no past precedence for your fear. The U.S. has dragged no one into a large scale war. Europe and Japan have dragged the U.S. into war, the U.S.S.R. initiated a long term arms buildup, but the U.S. has done nothing but defend itself and come to the aid of friends and enemies alike.

      --

      Mike van Lammeren
      It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

    11. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah. i agree. i just meant that I am a non american person agreeing with the post. religion without science is blind, science without religion is meaningless.

    12. Re:US Response by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 1

      Today I am not thinking about the attacks. I am thinking about those who suffered at the hands of the attackers.

      Today I am not thinking about the US response to the attacks. I am thinking about those who died innocently.

      Today it is not about what I think, it is about what happened.

      Today I remember.

      Ask me your question tomorrow.

    13. Re:US Response by slavetrade55 · · Score: 1

      I don't think Iraq is likely to nuke Israel. Iraq, strange as it may sound, is probably one of the more rational countries in the mideast for the simple reason that it is a military dictatorship instead of a theocracy or a kingdom. Saddam Hussein surely realizes that an attack on the USA or Israel will *immediately* result in his own destruction. I think any overt action by iraq is highly unlikely. However, the bigger problem I see is that the weapons developed in Iraq will not stay there forever. Hussein may not take any direct action, but it is not unthinkable that he will sell weapons to the other enemies of Israel and the US and before long we end up with crazy weapons in the hands of the princes and theocrats.

      So, should the USA takedown Hussein? I think that action sooner rather than later is the best course of action, so I'd say yes. Until there is some indication that mideast crazies no longer pose a threat to the USA, then america has a right and a responsibility to look out for its own interests and those of its citizens. So bombs away.

      --RMT

    14. Re:US Response by InOverMyFeet · · Score: 0
      What are you smoking? The US is the World. Everything that happens in the World is in some way steered by the US. If you don't like it, you better hope that "Europe" discovers life on another planet soon. "Well, from here in Europe..." Go ahead...jump on the outsider (A/C) band-wagon. But don't forget - If you, where ever you are in Europe, enjoy any kind of freedom it is because sometime in history the US helped make it possible.

      SIT BACK DOWN UNTIL A US REPRESENTATIVE TELLS YOU ITS OKAY TO SPEAK AGAIN

      --

      -- Probability does not dismiss possibility --

    15. Re:US Response by Troed · · Score: 1
      You _really_ need to get out more, read some non-American newsmedia etc.


      Your post is the most naive I've ever seen.


      USA is the only nation ever to have been convicted of terrorism in an international court of law

    16. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're talking about the United States of America, not the United States of Mexico. I can understand the confusion.

    17. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We understand why it happened. Fundamentalist Islam is a perverse cancer that spread over the middle east. They find non-muslims an abominations, successful non-muslims are the worst of all.
      The existance of the U.S. shows that their backwards culture isn't right, isn't good and isn't blessed by Allah. Therefore we must die.

      But you think its really because Saddam, the Taliban, etc. care deeply for human rights and are offended at our posture wrt the Kyoto accord. You are a tool.

    18. Re:US Response by artoo · · Score: 1

      Kuro5hin has a link to this article at New Times LA. It's unfortunate that I read this and think this is more true than I would have hoped.

    19. Re:US Response by Stween · · Score: 1

      Just today I saw an interview with a police officer at ground zero on the BBC, who was asked how she thought America had grown, and what it had learnt since Sept. 11th.

      She replied by saying the US still has to grow up. The US has to grow up in terms of its foreign policy, in order to change people's perceptions of itself. The US has to stop trying to wage war with anything that poses the slightest of threats.

      I was surprised to hear a police officer stating something the rest of the world already knows.

      I've said before to do nothing is often the wrong course of action. However, for as long as the US is willing to flex it's military muscle in nations of significantly less wealth, as long as the US continues to unfluence so many people outwith it's borders, as long as the US tries to police the world as we know it, there will be a significant continuing terrorist threat on it.

    20. Re:US Response by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 1

      "I think any overt action by iraq is highly unlikely."

      Do you suffer from short-term memory problems?

    21. Re:US Response by kavau · · Score: 1
      Others feel that the world climate is changing for the worst, and we simply need to start protecting ourselves more. What do you think?

      The single most important question is: how should we cope with the situation in the long run? And the statement above, in my view, reflects the core problem we are facing. Certainly the world climate is changing, and likely not for the better. But is "we simply need to start protecting ourselves more" really the best answer? The fact is, America is the only remaining super power, and everything that America does, will affect the world climate. Preemptive military strikes, assassinations of foreign dictators, increased hegemony, and all the proposed actions in this direction may indeed improve our security in the short run. But since we are (or want to be) the self-declared police of the world, should we not feel more responsible of what is going on in the world beyond our borders? Every military strike, every uncovered CIA operation will create more mistrust and aggression among other nations, and as a result will drive more people into the arms of terrorist organizations. Every military strike or diplomatic blunder today might give rise to another terror attack in ten or twenty years for now. I think we have the responsibility towards future generations to try to find a permanent solution to the problems we are facing in our time. And this permanent solution must mean more openness and not more alienation.

    22. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Economic oppression? That is funny. We give them billions a year for oil, something they just happen to have been born on top of. Any other country or culture would actually have to work or invent something in order to make money. They are handed all this money, take all this technology they would never be able to invent for themselves, and grow their population to levels that could never be supported without the wests money, food and technological welfare.

      If you are going to bother claiming that Islam has done any good for the world, try to cite an example from the last 1000 years.

    23. Re:US Response by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      Hussein is a bit erratic. For instance, I don't see any particular rational benefit from his attempt to assassinate the elder George Bush, when the latter (as a private citizen and former president) visited Kuwait. That smells simply like trying to fulfill a grudge.

      Also, during the Desert Storm, he did in fact launch Scud missiles into Israel, for no apparent reason other than to try to stir up trouble and cause a broader Arab-Israeli conflict.

      As to his possible behavior during a hypothetical US invasion, if one occurs he has little to lose by stirring up trouble, since it's unlikely that the US would compromise by offering anything better than arrest and trial. I suppose that he might hope for exile, but I doubt it.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    24. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... Because Hussein has become more rational after the Gulf War which was started from his other rational action -- the annexation of Kuwait.

      Yep, he's not out for his own destruction.

    25. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      International courts of law are a fucking joke, and if you would "open your eyes" you'd realize that. Guess who heads the UN's commission on human rights -- Libya's own Moammar Gaddafi.

    26. Re:US Response by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 1

      If the US had stepped aside, Europeans like yourself would most likely be under a dictatorship right now. Either that, or the USSR would rule the world with nuclear power to back it up.

      The trick is to find the right place to draw the line. It shouldn't be about nation-building or indoctrination. It should be about protecting freedom and democracy.

      I guarantee you that the next time some terrorist blows something up, be it with a nuke or a hand grenade, the world will turn to the US and say "You knew about this, you - arguably the most powerful nation in the world - and you did nothing to stop it?!"

    27. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its no more a joke that US "justice" if you happen to be black or poor.

      the us just wants to do as it pleases with the world, and not get caught.

    28. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah,yeah,yeah,

      sorry, the US today is definitly NOT the US of fifty years ago.
      dont even START to thing so...

    29. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would short-term memory loss of any kind have an effect?

      Iraq's invasion of Kuwait was over a decade ago and would naturally fall into long-term memory.

    30. Re:US Response by SirWhoopass · · Score: 2

      The Scuds at Israel wasn't really an erratic move. If the Israelis got involved, then the Arab coalition backing the war would have fallen apart (note that all those North American and European troops were stationed on Arab soil). Bush had to go to a lot of work to keep Isreal from responding to those Scuds (like the Patriot batteries we stationed in Israel).

    31. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, continuing to be successful is going to inspire envy and hatred.

      I don't give a shit. Sorry. Nor do I give a shit about what our back-stabbing "allies" in Europe think. Other than the U.K., they've proven that their sworn word is worth jack shit. They take us to task for not adhering to a treaty that wasn't even RATIFIED by us (Kyoto), while wiping their asses on the NATO treaty that protected them for nearly fifty years.

    32. Re:US Response by schnoz · · Score: 1

      I attended a lecture by Robert Fisk yesterday. Robert Fisk is a british journalist who writes for the Independent newspaper. He's one of the few journalists that actually tried to answer the why 9-11 as well as the where and what. I advise everyone to read his articles because they have so much depth and insight which is something we rarely get in the media here.

      As horrified we are all by what happenned a year ago, we should not forget that things happen for a reason. We should mourn all the lives that were tragically lost last year, but we should try to understand why and try to avoid it in the future. And this is exactly what George Bush is not doing!! Has anybody noticed how, just very recently, Bin Laden has faded out to be replaced by Saddam?! Does anybody mention Bin Laden anymore? Was Saddam mentionned in any way last year after the attacks?! The whole point is, Bush is following his own agenda and driving the world into more dangerous territories, instead of trying to learn from what happenned. Unfortunately, I fear the worst :(

    33. Re:US Response by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 1

      All depends on how old you are. Also depends of which atrocity you're remembering.

    34. Re:US Response by budalite · · Score: 1

      (Please insert a 30-min rant on stupid people saying stupid things here!!!!) I do not believe there is ever any reason to attack civilians. I believe anyone who does is a coward. I do not think the people in the Middle East (nor you, apparently) understands how most Americans view people (like you) who act in a cowardly way or condone such acts.
      Cowards are beneath contempt and deserve no consideration in any way. If we had the power, we would excise them from our Society as we would a disease. We will never forget. We will never forgive.

      (BTW: Many Americans view both the Israeli military and the Palestinian rioters as cowards, also. )

    35. Re:US Response by lamz · · Score: 2

      I get out all the time, and rarely read American newsmedia, though from what I've seen of it, the American media agrees with you, not me.

      You _really_ need to start thinking for yourself and realize that most U.S. bashing is misguided.

      Your post is the most naive I've ever seen.

      I always appreciate superlatives directed at my posts, but I must ask if there is anything more to your argument than personal attacks?

      USA is the only nation ever to have been convicted of terrorism in an international court of law

      Care to elaborate?

      --

      Mike van Lammeren
      It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

    36. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, from here in Europe, the image of the US is worse now than it was before 9/11.

      Sooner or later you guys are going to realize that we don't give a flying fuck about our image in Europe. You don't matter. We're not listening to you any more.

      Deal with it.

      As for us "joining the rest of the world", if that means paying attention to the UN, which puts Libya and Syria on the "human rights commission", you can go pound sand up your ass.

    37. Re:US Response by Stween · · Score: 1

      I don't think the next time a significant terrorist attack comes along people will be questioning the US about it. That will be left to the nation to whom the attack happened. Once again, I note the US trying to take control of everything. One (admittedly major) terrorist attack, and suddenly you feel all terrorist attacks are somehow inferior to what happened one year ago, and therefore all should look up to you.

      However, there will be serious questions asked of the Bush administration if another serious terrorist attack takes place against the US.

    38. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that certainly explains why U.S. blacks are moving to Libya en masse. It also explains why the U.S. has to put up fences to keep people in.

      What's that? U.S. blacks AREN'T moving to Libya, or anywhere else on the African continent? The U.S. has to put up fences to keep people OUT, not in?

      You don't have a friggin' clue.

    39. Re:US Response by toddhisattva · · Score: 1
      I personally feel we are continuing to provoke such things through our economic agenda, and that what bush's policy has been shortsighted and really retro-active.



      If someone disagrees with US Government policy, they can do what China does: buy it. They don't have to murder. Don't give the animals an excuse.

    40. Re:US Response by mbrod · · Score: 1

      Quite simply -

      "If all your neighbors hate you and you keep pushing them around, eventually they will all get together to push you around... and we have a lot of neighbors"

    41. Re:US Response by SirWhoopass · · Score: 2
      I was surprised to hear a police officer stating something the rest of the world already knows.

      What did you think? A nation of 300 million people, and we're all idiots? There are a lot of people that know all about the US policy towards Israel, that the CIA originally funded Taliban, etc. Not every US citizen thinks the USA Today is a good source of news. Not every European gets drunk and riots at soccer matches, but I see that in the news a lot.

      You state that the US has to stop trying to "wage a war with anything that poses the slightest of threats". What slight threat have we waged war against? If you're referring to Iraq, note that nothing has happened. Polls indicate that most US citizens are not yet in favor of an invasion. President Bush is certainly ready, but the US Congress has doubts. This is why our government is structured the way it is.

    42. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you smoking, the US is a country founded on slavery and oppression. Look at what you did to the Indians and the blacks!

      Free democracies exist all over the world independent of America.

    43. Re:US Response by randomErr · · Score: 2

      Here why we think the world should join us:

      Qusay Kills 15 'Nazi-Style'
      http://www.middleeastwire.com/iraq/stories/2001120 8_meno.shtml
      Kuwait Times (Kuwait City)

      Posted Saturday December 8, 2001 - 02:26:14 PM EST

      London - An opposition group confirmed yesterday that fifteen prisoners were executed on August 10, 2001 by placing them inside a specially designed gas chamber, Nazi-style, and then releasing a poisonous gas through vents, inside the presidential diwan.

      The Centre for Human Rights in the Iraqi Communist Party said in a statement sent to Kuna the horrific crime was committed under direct supervision of Qusay, the younger son of the Iraqi ruler Saddam Hussein.

      The victims were packed inside the room, before releasing the gas. They were dead within 27 seconds. Their bodies were left there for one hour until the gas was extracted through a special vent, it added.

      This barbaric crime was filmed on video and the film was shown to Qusay Saddam Hussein.

      The Iraqi regime is continuing its notorious "prison clean-up" campaign which has so far claimed more than 3,000 prisoners and detainees, the opposition group concluded.

      On another front, 10 leading members of Congress have urged President George W. Bush to make Iraq the next target in the US war on terrorism, saying it has reinvigorated its weapons programmes in the three years since UN inspectors left.

      "As we work to clean up Afghanistan, it is imperative that we plan to eliminate the threat from Iraq," said the letter, dated yesterday.

      "This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programmes." Among those signing the letter were Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott, House International Relations Committee Chairman Henry Hyde, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Jesse Helms, former presidential candidate Sen. John McCain and former Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Joseph Lieberman.

      The letter is the latest in a string of calls for a renewed offensive against Iraq and President Saddam Hussein once the Afghanistan campaign ends.

      The US launched its war on Afghanistan after its ruling Taleban refused to give up Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda network, blamed for the Sept. 11 attack on the United States that killed nearly 4,000 people.

      Sen. Helms acknowledged in a speech on Wednesday that the United States does not know if Saddam was directly involved with the Sept. 11 attacks. Still, he said, "there is a mountain of evidence linking him to international terrorism generally and to bin Laden's terrorist network specifically." In their letter, the lawmakers said international sanctions levied against Iraq are riddled with loopholes and illegal oil sales could not be contained by the administration.

      "Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programmes continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status," the letter said, adding: "We believe we must directly confront Saddam, sooner rather than later.

      "The threat from Iraq is real, and it cannot be permanently contained," the letter said.

      UN inspectors, who had been working since the 1991 Gulf War to ensure Baghdad did not develop weapons of mass destruction, left Iraq in December 1998.

      The lawmakers also urged support for the Iraqi National Congress (INC), saying the United States had learned from Afghanistan the importance of working effectively with local opposition on the ground.

      A leader of the INC, Ahmed Chalabi, met on Thursday with the Republican policy conference on Capitol Hill.

      Bush recently demanded that Saddam allow weapons inspections to resume and said he would "find out" the consequences if he refused.

      But Secretary of State Colin Powell told Nato ally Turkey on Wednesday that the United States had no immediate plans to extend its war on terrorism to Iraq. -- Agencies

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    44. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slavery existed long before the United States and the Romans killed far more indigenous people than the US ever did. One should also note that Americans didn't form America, it was the British, French, etc.

    45. Re:US Response by Ed+Bugg · · Score: 1

      Does anybody mention Bin Laden anymore? Was Saddam mentionned in any way last year after the attacks?!

      Actually I remember watching the news the last couple of nights and reading reports in newspapers about the latest Bin Laden Video that was supposily video taped sometime after last years attack where he mentions the names of 4 of the hijackers.
      I also remember vividly last year hearing reports from this news orgization or that news channel on weither or not reports of Saddam contributing money and supplies to Bin Laden's group. And how Bush's speech about going after countries that help and harbor terrorists seemed to be aimed directly at Iraq

      So yes Bin Laden does get mentioned even now a year afterwards and how Saddam was talked about even back then.

      --
      -- Ed Bugg --You have freedom of choice, but not of consequences.--
    46. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Half the UN is made up OF TERRORISTS! Premier sponsors of terror, such as Syria and Sudan, are on the UN "Security Council"!

      You can read the equivalent of The Wahhabi Times or the Bin Laden Independent for accurate, unbiased news if you want. I WILL NOT pretend to acquire truth from those who oppose everything I believe in.

    47. Re:US Response by Troed · · Score: 2, Informative
      You _do_ know that the CIA has performed terrorist actions against other supreme nations I hope? The US was convicted for one of those, in Nicaragua. The information is publically available.


      I feel as sorry for an Afghan peasant as I do for stockbrokers in the USA. bin Laden considered him at war with the US - the US consider themselves in war with the whole of Afghanistan. You're both completely mad.

    48. Re:US Response by mccalli · · Score: 2
      They take us to task for not adhering to a treaty that wasn't even RATIFIED by us (Kyoto), while wiping their asses on the NATO treaty that protected them for nearly fifty years.

      I'm from the UK. I have to say that a very common response when the NATO treaty was invoked was - "so when do the US troops arrive to wipe out the IRA then?". I'm sure the Spanish were thinking about ETA too.

      Treaty-breaking goes both ways.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    49. Re:US Response by intnsred · · Score: 1
      Do you remember the story just before (or was it during) the Gulf War, the one about cruel Iraqi soldiers going into Kuwaiti hospitals and stealing the babies' incubators? The story was full of details about how the Iraqi troops put the babies on the cold concrete floors and was "verified"[sic] by Kuwaiti doctors and officials.

      Of course, we later learned that the entire story was bullshit -- it was simple propaganda.

      While I'm not saying that the referenced story is false, I would take any stories like this with a huge grain of salt.

    50. Re:US Response by randomErr · · Score: 2

      Okay, how about some 'old' news from before 9/11/2001:

      http://whyfiles.org/059bio_war/basics.html
      http ://www.nci.org/3img/l62298.gif
      http://www.nci.org /l/l111998.htm
      http://www.salisburypost.com/edito rials/editorial1 21798.htm
      http://www.nci.org/a/AP10898.HTM
      http: //www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol5no4/kortepeter.h tm
      http://www.newsmaxstore.com/nms/showdetl.cfm?& DID= 6&ObjectGroup_ID=1&Product_ID=876&CatI D=1
      http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002 /9/11 /83858.shtml
      http://www.nci.org/sadb.htm
      http:// www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iraq/

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    51. Re:US Response by iabervon · · Score: 2

      Time to channel Desmond Tutu again...

      People only engage in terrorism if they feel they have no alternative. They don't do it for fun, or even because they think it's morally right. They may do it because they feel a group (perhaps a religious or political group) they belong to has no alternative; they may act as part of that group even though they could personally do something else.

      In order to stop terrorism, we must make every potential terrorist feel secure. We must make them all feel that they will not be conquered and ruled by people with no real concern for their needs. We must make them all feel that they will be able to avoid starvation, and that their families and their countrymen will be able to live decent lives. We must make them feel that they can do better by the people they care about by productive work than by blowing other people up. We must make them no longer feel the need for retribution.

      We must eliminate all terrorists in order to have security. Terrorism is just too easy for even a few people, regardless of anything we may do to make it harder. Killing all of the terrorists is too much; many more people who wouldn't have been terrorists would then take up the cause. We must, therefore, reform the terrorists. And in order to do that, we must give each and every one of them, and their governments, religious groups, and so forth, a way to exist without desperation.

    52. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until you have undeniable proof that Iraq has WoMD, take the proof to the UN, spend a fortune on propaganda to let everyone know this isn't a 'anti-muslim' thing. Then attack.

      Right now there's no real proof that Iraq has these weapons, from what I've heard they have less chemical/biological weapons than they had in the last Gulf War. It looks like Bush is doing this for either the oil/resources/arm trade, to exact revenge on yet another nation, or god knows else why. The US needs to be upfront and show the entire world that Iraq is a serious threat.

    53. Re:US Response by platypus · · Score: 2

      The Scuds at Israel wasn't really an erratic move.

      Indeed, and if we look at it closer, the Scuds at Israel were the clearest sign that Sadam Hussein does act rational - well sort of -, at least it shows that he has not to great suicidal tendencies.

      This is because if the Irakis had equiped these scuds with chemical/biological payload, which they had the technology for, a Israli counterstrike would have been unavoidable, and like you said, the coalition would have fallen apart.
      But at the same time, he had started a process which he would not have survived.

      Doing what he did was the "best" thing in this situation.

    54. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blaming it on "success" and envy is distinctly self congratulatory and non-productive. But it does justify continuing to behave like a petulant a**hole instead of a world citizen on a national scale. If you want to condense it down to "winners" and "losers" you will sooner or later end up being both - and only much later realize that your childish categorization was meaningless because everyone on this planet is in the same boat. (sorry if that offends your infantile nationalistic isolationism)

      "Other than the U.K., they've proven that their sworn word is worth jack shit."

      Gosh - then what is the US's word worth?

      The lies keep piling up on all sides.
      (Nicaragua, Panama, Guatemala, the Kurds in the north of Iraq and the insurgents in the south. These and more have been lied to by the US)

      Failure to see these lies on all sides is part of the whole problem.

      We don't have a monopoly on "truth" (or Mom or apple pie either) despite what our politicians would like us to believe.

      It just isn't that simple. (Neither is Kyoto - but I'm sure we'll all find that out when we're all gasping for breath or dying of cancer in a few decades.)

      sigh.

      Remember the dead. (all of them)

      Figure out the Why.

      Try to make sure that the "Why" does not keep happening.
      Good luck to us all.

    55. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes to war, there is no right answer.

      Gr@ve_Rose

    56. Re:US Response by lordmage · · Score: 1

      The US is not at war with Afghanistan. The US is at war with Al Queda, and those that support them (The Taliban). Afghanies enjoy more freedom and peace in Afghanistan now than they have in a long time.

      Lets not forget, the US should have put a lot more pressure on Taliban before... the suffering of the women was almost too much to bear.

      The Taliban also destroyed International Treasures in the Bhuddan Statues. Lest we forget, they thumbed thier noses at everyone.. included other muslim countries time and again.

      They are poor, but now they have more money being pumped into the country than they have had since Russia occupied it. They have thier own government back as well.

      As for the Nicauagran Rebels and such, Hey, The US aint perfect. Heck, we did deal with Iran on that "Iran Contra" affair, where we sold weapons to Iran for money that we gave to the Contras.. bad policy? Yep.

      Then again, I would say helping out in mogidishu (spelling) and kuwait and other countries was bad too.. ??

      --
      I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
    57. Re:US Response by Troed · · Score: 1
      Hey, The US aint perfect.


      Thanks. That's more than I expected to hear from anyone here.

    58. Re:US Response by Stween · · Score: 1

      No, you misread what I meant. I was getting at the fact I found it strange that they seemed to pick someone off the street. They'd normally end up having someone who has qualifications that allow letters after his/her name, or qualifications to allow Dr. before the name. And to clarify, I didn't state the part about waging war, she did.

      Btw, generally in Europe the game goes by its proper name of football :)

    59. Re:US Response by lordmage · · Score: 1

      Truth is truth.

      Even if I dont like it :)

      Right now, I am wondering if we have our own little dictator in office. Running around talking about attacking Iraq. Presenting information to other countries, but NOT TO US.. the Citizens of the country he wants to take to war.

      One of the basic freedom tenets is free flow of information, Bush believes, apparently, in secrecy. Where is a town meeting where he presents his evidence? Until he does that, He is making more mistakes.

      --
      I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
    60. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is my unfounded hope that the intense pressure created by this uncertainty will force Iraq into a political solution (e.g. far more open access for weapons inspectors in their need to prove that they have no such weapons) that might not otherwise have come about (they threw the inspectors out not so very long ago...)

      I just pray that that might avert war.

    61. Re:US Response by lugonn · · Score: 1
      That "town meeting" you refer to will be tommorrow(9/12/02), at the U.N. Only the town is made up of delagations from other nations. However, all Americans are free to watch the telecast and figure out "what Bush is up to".

      I'm not trying to defend Bush. I think he is a sneaky fuck. He thinks he can treat America like Yale students, being the elite 'Bonesman' that he is. But hopefully, at the address, he'll drop the "good vs. evil" retoric and give the US citizens, and the rest of the world, HARD evidence for an attack on Iraq.

      Ever since '91, I've wanted to make a wine goblet out of Saddam's skull.

    62. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. That's more than I expected to hear from anyone here.

      Don't get pissy because people love their country. You call them naive, fine. Let them be naive. Is it so wrong?

      People are not perfect and people make up a government. I'm assuming you are from another country from your tone.. How perfect is your government and history as a nation? Care to find a "perfect" government with "perfect" policies?

      I don't mind people questioning our policies (I question them myself), but the angst that we receive is sometimes a bit much.

    63. Re:US Response by Nailer · · Score: 2

      the U.S. has done nothing but defend itself and come to the aid of friends and enemies alike.

      Chile. 1973. Now shut up.

    64. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to see some people realize that they don't have all the answers.

    65. Re:US Response by xmedar · · Score: 2

      so when do the US troops arrive to wipe out the IRA then

      A freind sent a question to the CIA as they have many web pages on "The War on Terrorism" when they would stop the funding of the IRA by Americans, he is still waiting for a reply 9 months later I guess the CIA need that long to look-up the word "hypocracy" in the dictionary.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    66. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crapulence.
      Ask the citizens of any underprivileged nation
      how they feel about the bombing for a more justifiable reaction.
      This usacentric nonsense has really overflowed
      like a constipated toilet.

      If we had taken an interest in what our govt was doing before and after the attacks we MIGHT not have had to deal with the tragedy in the first place.

    67. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spare me your ass-talking bandit.
      Were you even around for most of the cold war and the glory days of nato?
      It sho dudn't sound like it sailor.

      Meanwhile kyoto(which isn't primarily military)is parsed away by (?conservative?) militants like yourself dragging out old featherbrooms and wiping the mantle clean of all the tawdry accumulation of misdeeds that plague our wonderful country.

      You need a cluebat friend.

    68. Re:US Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You like to believe this HS.
      When we firebombed and napalmed and atomized innocent civilans in the name of peace I wish you had been around to give us a piece of your
      Stephen Hawking's-like insight into the situation, you clueless prick.

    69. Re:US Response by bfandreas · · Score: 0
      What astounded me was the reasonable way how the Afghanistan campaign was carried out. Diplomacy first, military action later. AND EVERYBODY AGREED ON IT. I clearly remember 090112001. I first read about it on www.spiegel.de. Then this site nearly went down. Then I turned to ./. Then somebody got a TV and the whole company I worked at was sitting around it. My thougths then were(in that order)
      • disbelief; can't happen; tasteless joke
      • numbness
      • rage
      • got sick;puked all over the loo(still turn green when I see the pictures of the people jumping out of the windows)
      • fear from the US retaliation; George Women Bush isn't exactly the sanest person on the planet
      Thank god the last one of my fears did turn out to be insubstantial. But the latest effort to cover the failure to bring any of the al Qaida heads to justice really raises my fears again. Folks, remeber, it still is sorta dubious how W became prez.

      On a side note, I'm German. And I lost two persons I knew in WTC. One had to jump. They reconstructed this from where they found body tissue of him.

      911 wasn't an attack on the US. It was an attack against all the western world. Don't like government policy of another nation? Well, killing CIVILIANS who have little to do with it won't make your point. Same thing applies to those suicide bombers in Palestine/Israel. We get your point. You are partially right, but KILLING KIDS won't accomplish anything. Samuel Public and Ali Forgothisname all wan't the same thing. As anybody else. Live in peace and be allowed to live his dream. Dammit! It always hits the wrong persons.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
  10. FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like big cars, big guns, big motorcycles, and big tits. I believe the money I make belongs to me and my family, not some mid-level governmental functionary with a bad comb-over who wants to give it away to crack addicts squeezing out babies.

    I don't care about appearing compassionate. I think playing with guns doesn't make you a killer. I believe it's called the Boy Scouts for a reason. I think I'm better than the homeless. I don't think being a minority makes you noble or victimized. I don't care if you call me a racist, a homophobe or a misogynist. I am not tolerant of others just because they are different.

    I know that no matter how big Jennifer Lopez's ass gets, I'll still want to see it. I don't celebrate Kwanzaa. I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac, you do it in English. I don't use the excuse "it's for the children" as a shield for unpopular opinions or actions.

    I want to know when MTV became such crap. I think getting a hummer is sex, and every man is entitled to at least one extremely sloppy one per month.

    I know what the definition of lying is. I think Oprah's eyes are way too far apart. I didn't take the initiative in inventing the Internet.

    I want them to bring back safe and sane fireworks.

    I believe no one ever died because of something Ozzy Osborne, Ice-T or Marilyn Manson sang. I think that being a student doesn't give you any more enlightenment than working at Blockbuster.

    I don't want to eat or drink anything with the words light, lite or fat-free on the package. I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God or gods, and they can do it in their schools. I think the Clippers should play in the WNBA.

    My heroes are John Wayne, Ronald Reagan, Norman Schwartzkopf, Colin Powell and whoever canceled Dr. Quinn Medicine Woman. I think creative violence and useless nudity and sex makes Iraqis deader and movies more interesting.

    I don't hate the rich. I don't pity the poor. I know wrestling is fake, but I still think The Rock could kick my butt. I think global warming is junk science. I've never owned or was a slave, I didn't wander forty years in the desert after getting chased out of Egypt, I haven't burned any witches or been persecuted by the Turks and neither have you, so shut-the-fuck-up already.

    Rocky and Bullwinkle still makes me laugh. I think you can respect and admire women while mentally undressing them. I believe a self-righteous liberal with a cause is more dangerous than a Play Station.

    I want to know which church is it exactly where the Rev. Jesse Jackson preaches. I think explosions are cool. I don't care where Ellen DeGeneres puts her tongue. I think the cops have every right to shoot your sorry ass if you're running from them. I thought Spinal Tap was great, but Rob Reiner can still kiss my ass.

    I worry about dying before I get even.

    I like the convenience of buying oranges while I'm waiting at a stoplight, and I'm pretty sure the Latina midget selling them to me is glad she no longer lives in a refrigerator packing carton outside Ensenada.

    I figured out Bruce Willis was dead midway through The Sixth Sense but enjoyed it anyway. I think turkey bacon sucks. I want somebody to explain to me exactly why it's wrong to point out that when I watch a freeway chase, I know the losers the police eventually pull out of the car are gonna be gang-banging homies or hispanics.

    I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes a parent. I think tattoos and piercings are fine if you want them, but please don't pretend they are a political statement and not a fad. I like hard women, hard liquor and a hard bowel movement first thing in the morning.

    I believe you don't have to speak with a lisp to pick out a couch for your living room.

    I'll admit that the only movies that ever made me cry was Sands of Iwo Jima and Ole Yeller. I didn't realize Dr. Seuss was a genius until I had a kid. I will not conform or compromise just to keep from hurting somebody's feelings. Making love is fine, but sometimes I just wanna get laid.

    I'm neither angry nor disenfranchised, no matter how desperately the mainstream media would like the world to believe otherwise.

    YES, I'm a BAD American.... >:-)

    1. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Gruturo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Man, You are a poet!

      --

      Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule.
    2. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you, man!!

      Michael Savage for President!
      America needs a leader with balls!!

    3. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by analog_line · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I believe you're also, truly, a coward for posting this anonymously.

      Grow up, and take some responsibility for your opinions, if you're so all-fired proud of them.

    4. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God or gods, and they can do it in their schools.

      They can do it in their schools. That's not the issue. The issue is when teachers and school officials preach to the students. That is what's not allowed. You could have made this clear, but hey... why tell the truth when you can demagogue for cheap political points instead? That's a ploy straight out of the playbook of the liberals, my friend.

      For somebody who claims to be a libertarian, you don't seem to have figured out that government-sponsored religion is bad, bad news. See countries like Iran if you want to see where that eventually leads.

    5. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice copy and paste job, jerk-off.

      And the first person who says George Carlin wrote this gets shot.

    6. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by the_ph0x` · · Score: 1

      Your name isn't by chance, Dennis Leery is it?

      I couldnt stop thinkging of "I'm An Asshole" whilst reading that whole post... =) /salute

      But damnit you ruined your whole statement by posting anon...

      If it helps Im in almost total agreement with his post - I do think that people need less 'YOU MUST DO IT THIS WAY OR DIE' and more 'OK.. sounds good to me, lets try it your way' attitudes than anything else though.

      People need to take responsability for their own actions, forgive but not forget, and most of all offer out instead of asking for.

      --

      ---
      ps -aux | grep mind
    7. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As of this writing (mid-2001), versions of this paean to political incorrectness have been floating around for at least a year, variously attributed to George Carlin, Ted Nugent, Denis Leary and others. Its actual author is unknown. Carlin recently disavowed it on his Website. A variant ran in Nugent's Adventure Outdoors Magazine in early 2001, but the politically outspoken rock star did not take credit for it and other versions had already been posted on the Internet well before that.

      http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blbadamerica n.htm /a

    8. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ladies and gentleman... the next president of the United States... Hopefully. Who do we vote for? I printed this manifesto out and hung that sucker up in my cube. You are my god.

    9. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry that your mother named you analog_line.

      Oh, that's right--it's not your real name. Glad to see that you are effectively anonymous too.

      Go eat a bowl of dicks.

    10. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The human race, while a good attempt, is a flawed species.

    11. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by PW2 · · Score: 1

      I'm printing and framing this post!!

    12. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      George Carlin

    13. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are my hero..plain and simple.

    14. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by msheppard · · Score: 2

      The part about :" and neither have you, so shut-the-fuck-up already" assumes the reader is putting up some front or something. The rest doesn't, maybe you should leave that part out.... maybe change to "And neither have half the people who benifit from the money donated to these causes...," but I'm pretty sure you can put it better than that.

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
    15. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by the-empty-string · · Score: 1

      > YES, I'm a BAD American.... >:-)

      Yeah, and a plagiator.

    16. Re:FUCK COMMIE LIBERALS - I AM AMERICAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why cant we have a moment of silence in schools? How could anyone possibly be upset at a moment of silence?

  11. .... [all's quiet] by hummer357 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    i guess that a moment of silence is best...

    for the wtc victims

    for the pentagon victims

    for the future iraq victims

    for everyone that has ever died through the hands of injustice, opression, agression and that old capitalist tool: imperialism.

    1. Re:.... [all's quiet] by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Um also those people who were killed in Afghanistan, not because they voted for or supported the regime, but because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

      Lets us also mourn the freedoms lost to the average law abiding citizen around the world.

    2. Re:.... [all's quiet] by jeorgen · · Score: 1

      i guess that a moment of silence is best...

      for the wtc victims

      for the pentagon victims

      for the future victims in all countries of oppression

      for everyone that has ever died through the hands of injustice, oppression, aggression and that old tool of suffering: lack of capitalism.

    3. Re:.... [all's quiet] by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I am also having a silence, hey, even on TCP/IP level I lived sort of discrimination. No more details needed.

      Wrong people died at 9/11 , people would understand.

    4. Re:.... [all's quiet] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and for the 1000 afghans piled into steel containers and left to die of heat.

    5. Re:.... [all's quiet] by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      This is insightful??? Saddam Hussein is the cause of any victims in Iraq, and communism continues to claim victims in this world. Capitalism will remain a shining beacon of prosperity and any hope for world peace!

      Someone modded this up as insightful- sad. Its clearly flamebait!

    6. Re:.... [all's quiet] by dada21 · · Score: 2

      Imperialism isn't a capitalist tool, its an authoritative tool. True free-market capitalists get HURT with authoritative regimes such as ours. No capitalist wants regulations, tariffs, or subsidies. Only the authoritative business leaders desire those.

      Don't confuse media's definition of capitalism with the true definition of capitalism...

    7. Re:.... [all's quiet] by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      for everyone that has ever died through the hands of injustice, opression, agression and that old capitalist tool: imperialism.

      Ironically, if American was actually as imperialistic as its critics say, it wouldn't have these problems, because it could have flattened all opposition over the past decade.

      Really, terrorists and bullshit middle-east (and african) governments exist only because the Western world tolerates their existence. The bullshit governments are responsible for tens or hundreds of millions of deaths and the continued daily suffering of a large portion of the world's population. Terrorism is a symptom of this poverty. Perhaps America should become imperialistic. And bludgeon its victims with freedom and rights and prosperity.

    8. Re:.... [all's quiet] by lythander · · Score: 2

      I have little patience for those who say that those who live under a regime so oppressive and brutal to their own people are "innocent" when they are killed in an attack on that regime. They are either supporting the regime, or they are aiding and abetting by not opposing the regime.

      This is why there is so much immigration to the US and other western democracies. The west has created a free and open society (yes, we may bitch about the DMCA and RIAA, and rightly so, but we're quite free) which rather than serve as a model has come to serve as a haven for those who will not stay home and liberate their own homelands. We allow people in at such a rate that they feel no pressing need to fix what's wrong where they started out in the first place. Many of our forebears paid a heavy toll to bring us freedom (and I don't single out the US, but most of western culture), they should be staying at home earning their own.

    9. Re:.... [all's quiet] by hummer357 · · Score: 1

      capitalism?

      the kind that lets corporations drill for oil in a nature preserve
      the kind that starts wars because of economic interests?
      the kind that lets people starve in Africa, because there's money to be made with so-called blood diamonds?
      the kind that lets corporations behave as a monopoly, and lets them take away citizen's liberties?
      the kind that dubya & friends have been promoting for some time now?

      I don't think that we need that kind of capitalism.

      Give us *real* democracy!

    10. Re:.... [all's quiet] by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      How many civilian people did Saddam kill and how many were dead at desert storm?

      Dare to count?

    11. Re:.... [all's quiet] by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      Someone like you has been so warped by leftist propaganda that its a waste of time to try to reason with you and your feeble mind.

    12. Re:.... [all's quiet] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... for the Palistinian firemen, shot by american weapons in the hands of israeli soldiers.

      Firemen are our heroes, right?

    13. Re:.... [all's quiet] by BoredStupid · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about this. Afganistan has been crapped on by the rest of the world for like 20 someodd years now. While any death is unfortunate and sad, the fact of the matter is, if we do the right thing in Afganistan, and build a stable self-determined nation-state, there will have been less deaths in the long run than there would have been had we not intervened. Lets remember neither the Northern Alliance or the Taleban had too many problems with killing civilians, take for example the massecres that followed the (first) fall of Mazar-e-Sharif in '98 (I think). That country, and its people had been dying a slow death since '79, and it was partially our (the US's) fault. While certainly this was not our reason for going into Afganistan, it is a byproduct with value that I think it will be difficult to argue against. And most certainly the Afgan public has many more freedoms and rights than they did under the Taleban. Who knows whats next for the Afgans, running water and phone service perhaps?

    14. Re:.... [all's quiet] by BoredStupid · · Score: 1

      if only I could spell the word Afghanistan.

    15. Re:.... [all's quiet] by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
      Afganistan has been crapped on by the rest of the world for like 20 someodd years now.

      Last 20? Try the last few thousand.

      Start with Alexander the Great circa 300 BC and move forward. Scythians, White Huns, Turks, Arabs and Persians all took the place over at one time or another. And that was just in the first thousand years or so. Add to that a guy named Mahmud of Ghazni and Genghis Kahn. Then there were some petty warlords. Then the Brits. Then the Russians (not once, not twice, but at least three major times).

      This area is the crossroads of Asia. It's pretty much been shit on throughout human history.

      Now, what they really need is a few decades of peace to get their feet under them, build a stable tradition of government and society with the help of (but not the control of) other, more powerful nations. I don't think this is going to happen -- Bush might have had Karzi over for the State of the Union, but it looks like we're already about done with our "rebuilding" effort and are getting ready to go bomb another Arab state.

      Afghanistan could be the US's great ally in the region. We could provide modern construction equipment to rebuild their infrastructure and help from development advisors. We could give full-ride scholarships to five thousand prospective Afghani teachers each year. We could help them without trying to dictate a culture or a market or a way of life.

      If we could pay attention and help them out the way, say, we helped Isreal in the last 60 years, there's a pretty good chance we'd seem like less of an evil bully and more a helpful neighbor. The dirty secret, of course, is that's how you stop terrorists -- you take away their appeal to the common people so they look more like Ted Kazinskis than George Washingtons to those they're trying to persuade.

      Instead, it looks like we're already searching for another anthill to kick over. Bombing the fuck out of vastly inferior militaries might be fun in the short run, but it's counterproductive over a longer term.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    16. Re:.... [all's quiet] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You STUPID MORON!!!!!! Afghanistan's people didn't have any freedom before, and the number of people killed was NOTHING compared to other deaths wars around the world. So stop your bitching your liberal SCUM!!!! Probably Muslim Scum too.

    17. Re:.... [all's quiet] by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1

      So you believe that corporate rights overrule individual rights?

      --
      -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    18. Re:.... [all's quiet] by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      I believe that I am employed by a corporation, many people are employed by corporations, and corporations help to make the United States a wealthy and prosperous nation.

      I would rather work for a corporation than eat dirt in some desert in Kerblakistan.

      I also think that many people around here have a bizarre and irrational hatred of corporations.

      Corporations are what have given us a civilized life.
      How did you get from point a to point b today?

    19. Re:.... [all's quiet] by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1

      More bullshit black and white arguments.

      I'm not saying that free market business shouldn't exist. I'm saying that it shouldn't run unchecked, and that corporations shouldn't be able to run roughshod over individuals as they do now.

      • Why should the corporate world get a better system of representation in court, merely because they can pay for better lawyers than the average citizen can?
      • Why should my rights to use a free, open computing platform be diminished because a few media companies wish to protect their merchandise (by paying off corrupt politicians)?
      • Why can any given service provider change the terms of their contract at any time they see fit, yet an individual can't do something similar with their own homeloan?
      • Why do only two political parties get enough funding to ever be able to pay for the level of advertising needed to get themselves elected?

      People like you have been telling us for years to be afraid of the "communists", but driving us into the arms of corporations who are just as autocratic and corrupt.

      I abhor communism, but I also abhor corporatism. My life is my own and I'm damned if I'm giving up rights to someone else simply because they are richer than me.

      And how did I get from point a to point b today? I caught a government owned and operated tram.

      --
      -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    20. Re:.... [all's quiet] by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was gov't owned, but not gov't invented or built...

    21. Re:.... [all's quiet] by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1

      You think the corporate world has a monopoly on research and development? How about all those government funded universities out there in Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand?

      Just because the current political line of thinking involves downsizing governmental activities, it doesn't mean that public institutions can't do it, or that we've even got the optimal system.

      For what it's worth, the Soviets achieved just as much as the US under their system, without any help from the corporate world. Of course, the inherent corruption, autocratic nature of their government and lack of freedom meant that it would become the basket case that it did, but don't ever think that the corporate world has given you everything you want.

      The biggest problem at the moment is that while everything has been moved into the hands of the corporations, there's not actually much competition left to keep them honest. The level of ownership is very incestuous and there's far too many politicians willing to sell out voters on behalf of their rich mates.

      And one day we're gonna wake up and find that everything we want to do is illegal, because it infringes their rights to do business. And since citizens can't vote for who runs the corporations ... well, hey, this is sounding like the Soviet system all over again, ain't it?

      --
      -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    22. Re:.... [all's quiet] by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2

      Forget the spelling, your point is well made!!!!

    23. Re:.... [all's quiet] by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2
      You do not have to actively support an oppressive regime but if you do not coorperate at all, you will have certain problems. The first is that you lose your livelihood, the last is that you lose your live and that of all those around you.

      It is possible to do the right thing in an oppressive situation, take for example, Oskar Schindler, but it isn't easy to be a saint. If you want to leave, who is going to accept you. There are already documented accounts where political dissidents were sent back from the UK to Africa to torture.

      The US brand of freedom is a wonderful thing, but perhaps it would be nice if some persons din't exploit it.

  12. Tragic Event by LordYUK · · Score: 1

    The world trade center attack was a disgusting and cowardly act made by individuals who should all rot in whatever hell they believe in.

    Also, anyone profiting from this event should also rot in hell. I cant be the only one who is tired of seeing merchandise related to this event that. Not that I want to forget, just enough is enough.

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
    1. Re:Tragic Event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Disgusting yes. I just have a hard time agreeing with people who say over and over again that the hijackers themselves were cowards.

      Flame away.

    2. Re:Tragic Event by AppyPappy · · Score: 2

      Don't think that someone didn't think of creating a World Trade Center plush toy. The people pretending to be WTC victims were bad enough.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    3. Re:Tragic Event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are still calling this cowardly? I mean, disgusting and tragic, yes, but not cowardly.

      Any man who gets into a plane, and then flies it into the side of a huge building... I'm sorry to say, has a huge set of rocks on him. They might be horrible people, but certainly not cowards.

      I'd better not keep talking like this, or I might lose my opinion-based late night talk show!

    4. Re:Tragic Event by nege · · Score: 1

      does it even matter WHAT they are called, cowards or otherwise? Call them gone, because thats what they are. What WE need to do is work with what we are given. Not waste time justifying the actions of these people, or standing up for them.

  13. Rememberance by BShive · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Remembering 9/11 and what happened is important, and will continue to be important. However, the media in general seems to be back to it's same old self. Tons of 'tribute' and 'what happened' shows that won't do any justice to the events. Pick your own way to respect those past.

  14. no words to describe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe some prayer.

    beware the REAL .commIEs.

  15. Got me thinking... by headchimp · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What about all the other tragic events from the past that was forgotten.

    Feel free to mark your calendar for the other months besides September.

    January 28, (1986) The Challenger Accident

    February 13, (2001) San Salvador, El Salvador 6.1 Earthquake

    March 24, (1989) Exxon Valdez
    March 28, (1979) 3 Mile Island

    April 18, (1906) The San Francisco Earthquake
    April 19, (1995) The Oklahoma City Bombing
    April 14, (1912) The Titanic

    May 6th (1937) The Hindenburg Disaster

    June 6th, (1944) D-Day

    July 25, (1956) The Andrea Doria sinking.

    August 6, (1945) Hiroshima Bombed
    August 16 - 28 (1992) Hurricane Andrew

    October 8, 9, and 10, (1871) The Great Chicago Fire
    October 17, (1989) Loma Prieta earthquake
    October 23-29, (1929) Stock Market Crash

    November 17-18, (1978) Jonestown
    November 22, (1963) Kennedy Assaination

    December (1984) Union Carbide Bhopal Disaster
    December 7, (1941) Pearl Harbour
    December 21, (1988) Pan Am Flight 103 Lockerbie bombing

    1. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Um, having lived through TMI (Three Mile Island) I can assure you it was nowhere near the other tragic events listed.

      Besides, it's nice not needing to turn the lights on at night. I just hold my hand out in front me and voila! My own permanent flashlight.

    2. Re:Got me thinking... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't worry, eventually there will be another even more evil event that will bump 9/11 down the list. People suck; count on it.

    3. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see all those world-wide tragedies being recognised on the day that the world was bombed.

    4. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and so many more it would take years to write them down...

    5. Re:Got me thinking... by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Oddly, I agree with you there. It's inevitable that someone will try to outdo 9|11, perhaps to finish what was started (the rumored failed attempt to hit the white house?). Scary thought. What a fucking world we live in, eh

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    6. Re:Got me thinking... by ezfur · · Score: 1

      You really can't count .. August 6, (1945) Hiroshima Bombed We initated that ourselves

    7. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      world ? I thought it was ...

    8. Re:Got me thinking... by Des+Herriott · · Score: 5, Informative

      And:

      September 11 (1973) US-backed coup overturns democratically elected government in Chile, leading to thousands of deaths, tortures and "disappearances"

    9. Re:Got me thinking... by HomeGroove · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, I wonder where we'll be 90 years from now with Sept. 11. I look at your list and see Titanic. I took a kid to Chuck-E-Cheeses and there was a Titanic ticket game complete with a partially submerged ship in the center of it all. Often you'll see a submerged Titanic sticking up in the middle of some county fair. A giant slide. So kids can have fun on the ship that carried so many people to their deaths. Now I don't think anything like this will happen with 9/11. But you better believe we'll see a blockbuster movie. Count how many events above have been turned into multi-million dollar pictures.

      --

      ----
      Spam subject of the moment: Offshore account secrets -nashville disrupt

    10. Re:Got me thinking... by FTL · · Score: 2, Informative
      > March 28, (1979) 3 Mile Island

      Huh? Why does that belong there? Not a single person died. Nobody was injured. Granted, it was a PR disaster.

      I'd add the Nedelin Catastrophe to your list. October 24 1960. Over a hundred Soviet rocket scientists burned alive. Destroying the USSR's ability to compete in the Moon race. Imagine what space would be like today if the space race continued beyond the Moon...

      --
      Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    11. Re:Got me thinking... by larien · · Score: 2

      Yes, and now you (well, OK, Dubya) want to smack down Iraq because they might be able to develop a nuke. I find it ironic that the nation which probably has the biggest nuclear arsenal and has so far been the only nation to use them wishes to stop the president of a foreign nation from developing similar weapons.

    12. Re:Got me thinking... by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      August 9, 1945 - Nagasaki Bombing (iirc, it was the bigger of the two)

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    13. Re:Got me thinking... by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

      A database of distasters (natural and man-made) is available at:

      http://www.cred.be/emdat/intro.html

      (Click "continue" at the bottom to go on to the download pages.)

      Sept 11th doesn't appear to be amongst those listed for the US.

    14. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm. Lots of well publicised US events there.

      On a world scale of tragedy, most don't rate - I mean, seriously, Kennedy gets shot? 1 man compared to the nearly 3000 killed at the Twin Towers this day last year? 6 died on Challenger, but over 100 died in Nedelin with a Russian space program mishap.

      People die all the time - bad shit happens everywhere, all the time. It sucks, but that's the world we live in. You didn't even mention the floods that have killed hundreds in Europe this SUMMER! Millions are starving in Africa (largely due to Mugabe's senility). Trains have crashed in India. More suicide bombers are blown up around the world. It just goes on and on.

      I agree that we need to be more aware of what happens in the world, but lets keep things in perspective.

    15. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      September 11, (1976) US backed military coup in Chile

    16. Re:Got me thinking... by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      actually, that isn't irony.

      That's wisdom.

    17. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you really think the world did not change after Kennedy was killed off?

      If he lived, how do you think the world might be different today?
      Would Vietnam have lasted longer? Would Nixon would have been elected and resigned?

    18. Re:Got me thinking... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      What about the 60,000 people that are mangled to death in car wrecks each year?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    19. Re:Got me thinking... by sielwolf · · Score: 2

      Important days but they seem to be of a different ilk than 9-11:

      January 28, (1986) The Challenger Accident: Mechanical failure, 16 dead in a risk-taking venture resulting from poor engineering. Sure. A tragedy, but strapping onto a rocket is a little different then jumping into your car.

      February 13, (2001) San Salvador, El Salvador 6.1 Earthquake : Tragic but a natural disaster. No one of free will decided that their lives were expendable.

      March 24, (1989) Exxon Valdez : Natural disaster. No human dead. Damage to environment but in a global scale is insignificant. At most demonstrates disdain of corporations for environmental concerns.
      March 28, (1979) 3 Mile Island : Evidence shows that most disease attributed to 3 Mile Island is now shown to be unrelated. Superheated yet not-radioactive vapor shot into the air does not a disaster make. I'd put Chernobyl on here though.

      April 18, (1906) The San Francisco Earthquake : Tragic but Natural disaster.
      April 19, (1995) The Oklahoma City Bombing : Probably should be remembered but also very "in-house". Americans versus Americans. Has very little implication on a global scale.
      April 14, (1912) The Titanic : Tragic, but engineering and operator error and unintentional. Better remembered for disdain for steerage passangers held by the liner.

      May 6th (1937) The Hindenburg Disaster : 35 dead due engineering error (Hydrogen v. Helium). The Hindenburg had cared hundreds of passangers thousands of miles before this happened. More died in Flight 232.

      June 6th, (1944) D-Day : Military action. Important in the bigger scheme of things but not a disaster.

      July 25, (1956) The Andrea Doria sinking. : Operator error. The Stockholm runs into the Andrea Doria. Worst passenger ship disaster in history yet over 1600 survived.

      August 6, (1945) Hiroshima Bombed : Military action. Can be seen as the beginning of the Atomic Age but really can't be seen as a disaster (everyone else was working on nuclear arms). More died in the firebombings of Tokyo.
      August 16 - 28 (1992) Hurricane Andrew : Natural Disaster

      October 8, 9, and 10, (1871) The Great Chicago Fire : Bovine/Natural Disaster
      October 17, (1989) Loma Prieta earthquake: Natural Disaster
      October 23-29, (1929) Stock Market Crash : Economic Disaster not the result of an overt attempt to destroy the world economy. If you want to blame it for deaths, you should also blame it for WW2 (ending economic aid to Germany leading to an upswing in nationalist sentiment).

      November 17-18, (1978) Jonestown: Cultists kill selves (after killing US government officials). Many were "forced" but it isn't as barbaric as the Manson Family-Tate murders.
      November 22, (1963) Kennedy Assaination : One man dead (well two, if you count LHO). Throw McKinley and Lincoln in here.

      December (1984) Union Carbide Bhopal Disaster : Now this is tragic. 2500 dead, 200,000 injured. But then it was also unintentional (Do you think this helps Dow in anyway? They cut costs and took people's lives).
      December 7, (1941) Pearl Harbour : Military action. Unprovoked but military action nontheless (it is more "infamous" than tragic).
      December 21, (1988) Pan Am Flight 103 Lockerbie bombing: 259 dead.

      I guess 9-11 is more tragic since it is a global issue and very 21st century. Civilians killing other civilians without recourse through the infrastructure humanity has been building up for the last... 3000 years? Such an attack would have been impossible outside of the last hundred years. The individual (or a small cadre) now ignores the system and decides the fate of thousands of others. Say what you want of GWB, at least there is a system there to keep him honest (and, if US Citizens cared, pull him back). Now instead of governments controlling our lives, we are now in the hands of people exactly like us (average, middle-class non-government, non-military) who see expression for their ideals in our deaths. And in our deadly age, there is very little to stop them.

      --
      What is music when you despise all sound?
    20. Re:Got me thinking... by Arcturax · · Score: 4, Informative

      Thank you for pointing that out, I just learned about this the other day in fact.

      Here is a link:http://www.americas.org/News/Features/200110_ After_the_Attacks/200110Chile.htm

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    21. Re:Got me thinking... by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 1
      August 6, (1945) Hiroshima Bombed

      Not only did we initiate this incident, as someone else previously stated, but more Japanese citizens died because of the incendiary bombing of Toyko than the nuke over Hiroshima.

      Of course this doesn't take into consideration the other factors (Japan brought us into the war, we were at war, Japan was beaten but would not surrender, Japan was forewarned of impending doom, and the bombs arguably prevented a mainland invasion estimated at causing 250,000 to 1 million U.S. casualties, not to mention the deaths of all those Japanese kids and women fighting with bambo sticks).

      Japan only surrendered because their Emperor (Hirohito) stepped out of his traditional spiritual and political boundaries and forced the stubborn military members of the council to accept it. Even then there was a failed coo attempt to stop his pre-recorded surrender broadcast from airing to the Japanese people.

      Uh ok, so I'm getting a little off topic but the point is that "Little Boy" arguably saved more lives than it killed and certainly wasn't any more tragic than some of the other events of War in the Pacific (Tokyo).

      --
      -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
    22. Re:Got me thinking... by stanmann · · Score: 2, Informative

      April 26,(1986) Chernobyl
      April 20,(1978)Korean Airlines flight 007 shot down by Soviets in Russian airspace

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    23. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "March 24, (1989) Exxon Valdez : Natural disaster. No human dead. Damage to environment but in a global scale is insignificant. At most demonstrates disdain of corporations for environmental concerns." A Natural Disaster? How can a drunk boat captain slamming an oil tanker into the ground Natural?

    24. Re:Got me thinking... by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      Do you really think the world did not change after Kennedy was killed off?

      Yes I do think the world changed, which is why I do not call it a tragedy, the goddamn corrupt excuse for a human being.

      If he lived, how do you think the world might be different today?

      Better gambling facilities probably, cheaper drugs?

      Would Vietnam have lasted longer?

      Could'nt have lasted much longer, given the beating the US was getting.

      Would Nixon would have been elected and resigned?

      Yes

    25. Re:Got me thinking... by sporty · · Score: 2

      Some of them should be remembered, true. But you have to remember, 9/11 was just last year. A lot more of us are still feeling the effects of it. On top of it, it was an act of war that killed 3000ish, that affected the stock market and our entire economy in one of the largest cities of the world. Plus, the Pentagon was hit, with the intent to take out a good chunk of our leaders.

      I'm not saying that any other disaster isn't worth remembering. You are right, we should have it on our calendars at least as a reminder of all the wrong that has occured, due to falt and due to fate.

      It's just not as easy to forget what happened, when you don't know where your loved one was or will never see them again, just 350-something days ago. I'm mostly over it, but to some degree, it still saddens me to think that the skyline that was NY, with two very awesome towers, whre I used to lay down on the promenade between the buildings and just look up at the endless towers with someone I loved once. It's not a place I wanted to give up but was forced to. Then there's the lives that were lost and a constant blanket of fear of what will happen next.

      Sorry if I sound preachy, or a little sentimental, but today, for me, and many others... many many others is a very important day of rememberance. Maybe next year or two years from now when time has healed wounds more, it won't seem so hypocrytical.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    26. Re:Got me thinking... by dlkinney · · Score: 2, Informative

      April 4th, 1968: Martin Luther King, Jr. assassination.

    27. Re:Got me thinking... by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      What about the India train disaster, 100 people died and it happened yesterday and hardly even got a mention becuase of the 9/11

    28. Re:Got me thinking... by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2

      actually i heard flight 93's target was capitol hill. it would make more sense to attack the legislature of a democracy (republic, whatever), then the executive if you're a terrorist.

      a nation waging war on the usa might want to target the president to disrupt command and control, but a terrorist would have different goals i'd think. i have a hard time attributing rational thought to a group of people that see mass murder as a viable course of action, but bin laden et al seem to have some method to their madness. and my guess would be that their aim was disruption. attacking the wtc was to affect the economy. attacking the pentagon goaded the hawks that much more. attacking capitol hill would disrupt democracy. the overall goal of bin laden was both to hurt the usa but also to push it to over-react.

      another comment made earlier stated that people have underestimated the usa in the past and they gave a list. flight 93 wasn't on that list but it should have been. i expect that the next time someone tries to hijack a plane anywhere near us airspace they'll find a new reaction from the passengers and crew.

      --
      US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    29. Re:Got me thinking... by pubjames · · Score: 2


      I can't be the only one who feels a bit uncomfortable with all the press that September 11th is receiving.

      There have been other, bigger disasters elsewhere in the world, as you point out, which received less attention in the press.

      Bhopal is a good example. 6000 dead immediately, an estimated 20,000 thereafter, with many of hundreds of thousands more injured. And the company responsible paid out a paltry amount to those affected, and even then four years after the incident and because of a lawsuit. Yet it is virtually forgotten about by most people these days.

    30. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sure as hell counts if you are Japanese.

    31. Re:Got me thinking... by sckeener · · Score: 1, Troll

      What about all the other tragic events from the past that was forgotten.
      Feel free to mark your calendar for the other months besides September.


      I'd like a holiday for all of those, please!

      I'll even work those holidays...of course I need time and a half pay.....

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    32. Re:Got me thinking... by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 2

      Hear hear, sielwolf. Well spoken.

      I definitely see a tremendous moral difference between 9/11 and, well, most anything on that list.

      Sept. 11th was simply the largest mass-murder of all time. People can try to deflect blame back to the USA, but the fact remains: those people deliberately chose to pilot the planes into the WTC and the Pentagon. They decided to do it, of their own free will. The USA didn't FORCE them to do it.

      It's like saying a criminal killed an old lady because of his difficult childhood. Certainly, it was a factor... but the blame lies with the criminal, who made the final decision to cut the old woman's throat.

    33. Re:Got me thinking... by Patman · · Score: 2

      December (1984) Union Carbide Bhopal Disaster : Now this is tragic.
      2500 dead, 200,000 injured. But then it was also unintentional (Do you
      think this helps Dow in anyway? They cut costs and took people's
      lives).


      Before you go making a lot of statements like this, you might want to read a good book on the subject. I've read several, and it's not quite this cut-and-dry.

      First of all, Dow Chemical had nothing to do with it. Dow now simply owns the Union Carbide assets and intellectual property.

      Second, UCC had little to do with it - at least, the UCC of America. The Bhopal disaster was a function of Union Carbide India Limited, of which UCC was merely a holding company. A small point, perhaps, but it's critical to remember that *UCC* did not cut costs, UCIL did.

      Third, UCC took a whole lot of responsibility for the accident. The CEO of UCC flew to Bhopal immediately after the attacks, where he was held under house arrest for several days before being released and ordered out of the country.

      In addition, the Indian government forced the case settlement, and they are the ones who refuse to re-open the case and/or open criminal charges against the company or it's officers.

      Are they innocent? No. Mistakes were made. But mistakes were also owned up to. UCC went from the number-two chemical company to the gutter quickly. It doesn't make up for the dead, but they sure didn't get off scot-free.

    34. Re:Got me thinking... by Yaruar · · Score: 2

      And the Iranian airliner shot down in dubious circumstances during the gulf conflict by a maverick US warship commander.

      --
      Working for the (other) man
    35. Re:Got me thinking... by Jonathan_S · · Score: 2, Informative

      If your going to list Three Mile Island you should also have the really bad nuclear accident

      April 26 (1986) Chernobyl Power Plant exposion.

    36. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I imagine people would believe we didn't land on the Moon OR Mars, and then in 2002 NASA would approve a commercial mission to prove both the moon and mars landings (U.S. landed on the Moon, and the USSR landed on the red planet of course!).

    37. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will be ignored.

    38. Re:Got me thinking... by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2
      He wasn't a maverick--the ship's crew misidentified the plane. It took off from an unfriendly military airfield, so was tagged as a foe. Its transponder responded as a civilian, so Petty Officer Anderson checked the listing of civilian flights. He missed the entry for the plane, and confirmed the flag.

      Later, he re-pinged, but without resetting the range. He got back a reply which identified a military plane (sitting on the ground of the airfield).

      The captain, who was involved in a sea battle at the time, decided to shoot down any unfriendly aircraft which made it to the 20 mile point. His ship sent out four messages warning the aircraft to stay away. Remember, a year earlier the Stark had been hit by an Iranian missile and many men were killed.

      He ended up waiting until it was 11 miles out and then, relying on the information he received from his crew (that it was descending, as an attacker would), ordered that it be shot down.

      It was in the middle of wartime, there was a battle going on, and he was informed that his ship was under attack. He attacked quite responsibly--hardly as a maverick.

    39. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only good Indian is a Dead Indian!

    40. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, then maybe they should have flown.

      Statistically speaking, flying is safe than driving.

    41. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that before or after Allende hugged Fidel Castro and professed his allegiance to Communism, as the Chilean economy spiralled in to oblivion?

      Get your facts straight, kthnx.

    42. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im travelling in Bolivia and Peru right now, and have seen small demonstrations and general negative feelings about the perceived US hypocrisy over Sept 11th.... nothing too major, and people here do have empathy for the suffering in the US last year...

    43. Re:Got me thinking... by Ringlord · · Score: 1

      Actually, with all the tragedies people has been listing it seems I should sit down and cry a bit every day in the calendar.

      Life do goes on, and so should we. The dead are dead, but let me be glad to be alive.

    44. Re:Got me thinking... by refactored · · Score: 2
      http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/Africa/DRC .asp
      "Described by some as Africa's first World War, the conflict in the DRC (formerly known as Zaire) has involved seven nations. There have been a number of complex reasons, including conflicts over basic resources such as water, access and control over rich minerals and other resources as well as various political agendas. This has been fueled and supported by various national and international corporations and other regimes which have an interest in the outcome of the conflict. There have been 2.5 million deaths since the outbreak of the fighting in August 1998"
    45. Re:Got me thinking... by balazsa · · Score: 1

      Largest mass murder of all time :)

      You didn't read any historical book about the last 3000 years did you.

      --
      Is it right? Not?
    46. Re:Got me thinking... by Micah · · Score: 2

      yep. Roughly the same thing happened in Guatemala in 1954. Its new democratically elected government was implementing a quite reasonable agrarian reform package that probably would have significantly raised the standard of living in Guatemala.

      Instead, the USA saw it as an extension of Communism, a threat, and the CIA replaced the new government with a military dictatorship that caused DECADES of untold suffering and countless deaths and disappearances.

      Now, I'm an American, love America for the most part, and even have conservative political leanings. (Most people that bring this stuff up are staunch liberals.) But you just can't ignore this stuff. When we cause suffering around the world of this magnitude, how can we expect other nations to not hate us?

    47. Re:Got me thinking... by btellier · · Score: 2

      We did that because we were AT WAR with a government who were going to send millions of civilians to fight us on the beaches with spears. Christ, how hard is it to understand that if Iraq gets a nuke they're going to USE IT TO WIPE OUT ISRAEL OR THE US? We weren't blowing up people because we felt like it, we blew them up because they attacked us. He will use it to kill as many civilians as possible for ideological reasons.

    48. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one at all got hurnt at 3 mile island. It was a non-event.

    49. Re:Got me thinking... by Fjord · · Score: 2

      It's like saying a criminal killed an old lady because of his difficult childhood. Certainly, it was a factor... but the blame lies with the criminal, who made the final decision to cut the old woman's throat.

      It'a actually more like saying a criminal killed an old lady because she gunned down his brother to get some gas money. Certainly it was a factor, but the criminal should have gone to the police that the old lady has paid off.

      --
      -no broken link
    50. Re:Got me thinking... by boog3r · · Score: 1

      you can thank the school of the americas for that one. all the bad shit my government does kinda makes it real two-faced when championing this war on terrorism. remove the beam in your eye before removing the splinter from your neighbor's...

      --
      signatures are for fools with hands
    51. Re:Got me thinking... by Yaruar · · Score: 2

      Unfortuantely the messages sent in warning were on military frequencies which civilian aircraft don't as a rule monitor. And the warship itself was off course which led to the misidentification.

      His previous record showed him to be a hero, yes, but one who didn;t always think before he fired.

      --
      Working for the (other) man
    52. Re:Got me thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should include the this, although not a specific date

      April - June 1994 Rwandan Genocide. 800,000 Rwandans killed (mostly Tutsis by Hutus)

    53. Re:Got me thinking... by Des+Herriott · · Score: 1
      I have my facts straight. Do you?

      The biggest reason for the collapse of the Chilean economy was US-sponsored blockades, embargos and denial of international aid. Nixon himself ordered the CIA to "make the Chilean economy scream".

      And even if Chile's problems were if its own making (which they were not), did that give the US the right to topple a democratically elected government and install a vicious military dictator responsible for the torture and death of thousands (including some US citizens)?

      Some enlightening reading

  16. When I heard the news by SweenyTod · · Score: 1

    I was at the top of a 9 story building in Birmingham, UK. I was installing some software for a company, and slowely I became aware of everybody starting to talk. Wandering past a desk, I saw people looking at their web browsers and talking about the WTC. Heck, I didn't even know what the WTC was, except it was in America. I had no idea it was those two damn big buildings.

    On the train back home, listening to the radio, I heard what had actually happened. The first reaction was shock, followed by "Oh My God".

    Then came fear. Not of what could happen to me, but of what the Americans would do when they found out who did it. Back then, I was living in a hostel with around 120 other people, and it was a fear shared by the dozen or so people I talked to about what had happened.

    I'm still a bit afraid of what the Americans might do, but not as much.

    My thoughts go out to you all in the States. Hang in there, and remember that a lot of us in other countries are thinking of you.

    --
    Alas gallinaceas de urbe bovis volo
    1. Re:When I heard the news by MoonFog · · Score: 1

      I remember being at work at a supermarked ( live in Norway ).. a guy came over and said a plane had crashed into one tower of the WTC.. I thought it was just a crazy accident. We turned on the radio, and as we did the news came about the second airplane hitting. We turned on the tv and let it run the rest of the day ( even though we didn't have the license to do so ). School next day was horrible .. everybody talking about what had happened. Even though it was thousands of miles away it felt like it happened in my country as well.

    2. Re:When I heard the news by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I was in my cube at work in Kansas City, MO. I don't remember just what I was doing, but I overheard people talking in the distance about a plane crash involving the WTC. I assumed it was an accident and continued working. Then I overheard that it WASN'T an accident! I stopped working, and started asking my co-workers what was going on. When they told me, I didn't quite believe it, and checked the internet for more info, right about the time everything slowed to a crawl. A couple hours after that, they let us off work, and I listened to the radio on my way home. The whole thing seemed like a nightmare! I don't think it really sunk in until the next day what had happened.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:When I heard the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you do something about the Muslim scum who are celebrating the attack on the WTC in London today. The scum are celebrating the death of 3,000 Americans. Mulsims can't be trusted!

  17. I will not forget the one or many by vcbumg2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I will not forget Edward Earhart, 26, transferred to the National Ice Center last December after serving a three-year stint at Pearl Harbor. He, too, died during the Pentagon attack. Following in the Navy footsteps of his father and grandfather, Ed made meteorology a career -- his family talks about how Ed always relished tracking weather. Early this month, on his last visit home, Ed captured the curiosity of preschoolers by talking about clouds and weather in his cousin's classroom. Just as his friend Matthew Flocco, Ed earned high respect for his unflinching willingness to get a job done right. He talked often about his close family, their farm in Kentucky, and the Detroit Lions. He loved computers and was about to learn golf. In his memory, Ed's family has created a fund to help build a veterans' memorial.

    --

    projects @ http://spectechnologies.net

  18. Sad day by Dynamoo · · Score: 1
    It's a sad day today, but also a day to take stock and look to the future.. and hope that this does not happen again.

    Several sites are running 9/11 front pages, notable Yahoo and Amazon.com. Some sites aren't, such as Google, some are more subtle such as Alltheweb.

    Personally, I like the /. black banner. I suggest you click on it.

    Also check out the Todd M Beamer Foundation. Make sure you have your credit card handy.

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:Sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google has a little ribbon thing on it.

  19. not for the faint of heart by AsnFkr · · Score: 1

    but a very well written intelegent point of view on 9/11 written in October by the lead sing of the shock rock band GWAR. here

    1. Re:not for the faint of heart by Leeto2 · · Score: 1

      Wow. He got it right!
      I think one of the reasons Americans are so fond of bombing the shit out of someone is you can see immediate results. We are an "Instant gratification" culture. Rebuilding a nation takes a lot more time, energy, and money.
      Congress didn't want to give aid to Japan, but were persuaded when Mac Arthur was reputed to say, "Send me food, or send me bullets." (or something to that effect.)
      Even "W" has realized that this (or any) war simply can not be won by weapons alone. I would much rather face off against Afghani businessmen than religious fanatics.
      Eliminate poverty throughout the world, and you remove the foundation the terrorists stand on. We as a nation have so much, it amazes me that we give to little to those who desparately need it.

      --



      "That's no moon"... Obi-Wan Kenobi
    2. Re:not for the faint of heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would read it but I'm busy now focking an animal!

  20. A Thanks... by Alpha42 · · Score: 1

    A definate thanks goes out to the entire Slashdot crew for the quick update one year ago today... I happened to be doing my normal morning slashdot run when I found out about the mess.

    And an even LARGER thank you to the users here at slashdot who happened to be in the comments thread that fateful day. Especially the guy who offered up the quicktime CNN Audio feed for the day. (And who's bandwidth bill for that month I would not want!) ;) Without you I would have been in the dark all morning, since all the mainstream news sites were useless.

  21. One more in a long list of victims by steve.m · · Score: 2

    Welcome to the rest of the world. The UK and lots of other countries have been suffering at the hands of terrorism for years. The fact that the USA joined this sad list last year doesn't really change much.

    Yes it hurts, but it hurts the victims friends and families more than it effects the man-on-the-street. Let them grieve in peace.

    1. Re:One more in a long list of victims by laserjet · · Score: 2

      I think it changes quite a bit. The U.S. has taken the responsibility as the world's only super power to *DO* something about the problem. Other countries will follow, but it took a leader to get things started.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:One more in a long list of victims by larien · · Score: 2, Troll

      Yup, the UK has suffered terrorism for decades. Notably, terrorism from the IRA, funded at least in part by the US. Since Dubya has declared that those who fund terrorists are guilty, when is he going after the catholics in the USA?

    3. Re:One more in a long list of victims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the rest of the world. The UK and lots of other countries have been suffering at the hands of terrorism for years. The fact that the USA joined this sad list last year doesn't really change much.

      Not to be too much of a dick, but when was the last terrorist attack that was done on such a huge scale, in the UK?

      Do you even have a skyscraper filled with thousands of people?

    4. Re:One more in a long list of victims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be political suicide as we all hate slimy Brits, Ultster unionists in particular, and we have all been just fine with the prosecution of a legitimate war by the IRA.

    5. Re:One more in a long list of victims by sielwolf · · Score: 2

      [snip]...when is he going after the catholics in the USA?
      Actually the United States has gone after numerous IRA funding organizations and gun smugglers for many years. But since it seems to be a pretty constant operation you aren't going to get big splashy headlines on it every week (the same with Mafia or Columbian cartel stings).

      So what do you want? To lock up everyone with a 'Mc' or 'O' prefixed to their name?

      --
      What is music when you despise all sound?
    6. Re:One more in a long list of victims by wazzzup · · Score: 2

      If I recall correctly, the UK (particularly London) is one of the more popular places for middle eastern folk/islamic fundamentalists to live so, by using your logic, the UK funded, at least in part, the 9/11 attacks.

      Sometimes I get so sick of hearing how terrible and oppressive the US is to the rest of the world.

    7. Re: One more in a long list of victims by crivens · · Score: 1

      He won't. Why? Because they're not a threat to the US. Bush will only go after those organisations or countries that pose a threat to the US.

    8. Re:One more in a long list of victims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The arrogance of the average american is absolutely astounding. You honestly think that the USA is the only country that has tried to "do" something about terrorism? Here's some news for you, Jeb, the USA's "war on terror" will fail, or more succinctly it will succeed just as much as the "war on drugs" or the "war on flab". The USA leads the world like Microsoft leads the OS development community.

    9. Re:One more in a long list of victims by r00tarded · · Score: 2

      aye, that would be a wee bit o' mistake ya know.

    10. Re:One more in a long list of victims by xmedar · · Score: 2

      Al Q and Bin Laden are more legitimate than the IRA, if you recall from history AlQ/UBL are fighting for Palestine, a land taken from its people without their agreement, the IRA are fighting a war that was settled with the partition of Ireland agreed by both parties to the conflict, if you think it is more legitimate for someone to go back on an agreement than it is for people to fight for what was stolen from them then you must be a complete psychopath.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
  22. Two articles... by stubear · · Score: 2

    ...I found express what I feel quite nicely. The first article was found through Kuro5hin. The second article is from The Onion. The scary thing about The Onion article is how close to the truth they came this time while still maintaining the parody. I guess the only thing that dies on 9/11 is irony. Go figure.

  23. you forgot by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    For the Talaban who became 'terrorists' hmm nice that, I guess that the Irish government are also terrorist.................. and all the governments arround the world who refuse to hand over 'allegid' criminals to a hostile country without proof

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:you forgot by laserjet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You forget that the only sure "proof" of Saddam building/having weapons of mass destruction is USING those weapons. With Iraq's track record, they are not trustworthy.

      I would rather get rid of him now than wait 5 years when a missile is in the air and we all say, "damn, I guess he really did have a nuke."

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:you forgot by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I'd rather get rid of
      Bush, Monsanto, the RIAA, the WIPO, the MPAA
      get the jist?

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:you forgot by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I was just talking at the problem presented by the parent poster.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    4. Re:you forgot by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      hmmm I'm confused,
      Has Iraq used or supported the use of those weapons any more then the USA (hmmm didn't the USA make a whole in Japan?)

      I'm sory but I trust a country with a strong religious following and thousands of years of history more than the USA.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    5. Re:you forgot by laserjet · · Score: 2

      No, Iraq hasn't. But have you forgotten what Saddam is capable of? Do you remember what he did to spur our response a few years ago? He hasn't let weapons inspectors in, and is hiding things. Iraq in the near future will be the supermarket for terrorism.

      And I don't like Saudi Arabia either.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    6. Re:you forgot by JeffryG138 · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm just not buying this. During the Gulf War, Iraq had chemical weapons. Did they use them? No -- we would have flattened Baghdad so quick he would have never known what hit him. Does anybody really think Saddham Hussein is suicidal? Vengeful, even? He is a dictator that has it pretty good - if he gets so-called "weapons of mass destruction" he will only use them to increase that status, not diminish it. Right now, Israel is the big super power of "Weapons of Mass Destruction" in the area. But they are our friends, and not Arab, so ...

    7. Re:you forgot by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they would have to figure means to deliver that nuke too.(probably possible for short range). the chem. weapons that iraq has been known to use(in the war vs. iran) worry me much more.. and there is a way to make the whole world know you got nukes, pakistan and india did it just a while ago.. tho it really wouldn't surprise me to see some russian bomb missing..

      anyways, basing attacks on "iraq has been discovered to trying to obtain aluminum pipes" sounds just weak. just say "we need to kick someones ass, quick". "new kind of war" indeed, though, you should remember from the fallout starting intro: "war.. war never changes.".

      our history teacher used to say of the american politics: "making inner politics with outer politics", doesn't seem to have changed since 60's.. or should i say 50's and the commie hunts.

      i am not trying to be rude to 9.11 moaners.
      but i don't want to be rude to gazillion other people who died of wars, disease, death sentences, hunger & etc. during the last year.

      and some totally unrelated humour: "what's an elevator in moscow? tchechen presses button and 9 floors come down.". haven't seen variation of that joke yet in 9/11 form..

      and the media has really really capitalised on the social-pr0n available from 9.11, i don't think they gave the documentaries for free to other tv stations..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:you forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I guess I'm just not buying this. During the Gulf War, Iraq had chemical weapons. Did they use them? No --"

      Actually yes, out of 400,000 US soldiers in Iraq 130,000 of them came down with this thing called gulfwar syndrom. I am not sure what kinda chemical it was but I doubt 30% just happen to get the flue that week.

    9. Re:you forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're such a child. Yes, cracking down on Napster is far worse than wanton mass murder. You're right.

      Now go home and listen to the CDs mommy and daddy bought you.

    10. Re:you forgot by laserjet · · Score: 2

      During the Gulf War, Iraq had chemical weapons. Did they use them? No...

      Uhh, yes they did...

      Read this document. The US had its own crummy reasons for saying Iraq didn't use those weapons. Both acts are horrible.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    11. Re:you forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the RIAA, the WIPO, the MPAA

      Yes, because not being able to use Napster, register the disney.com domain, or watch DVDs on your Linux box is EVERY BIT AS BAD as being shot in the head and tossed into an unmarked grave, getting attacked with poison gas, or, if you are a woman, having your clitoris cut off.

      The people you mentioned are shitheads, no doubt about it, but that's not the point. Maybe someday you'll grow out of the stage of adolescent bimodal judgment (where things are either "cool" or they "suck, ala Beavis and Butthead) and realize that some things suck a lot more than others.

      As much of a prick as he may be, Jack Valenti hasn't killed anyone. As much as you dislike Bush, Nader and Gore are still alive and still free.

      Look up what happens to people who oppose Saddam.

    12. Re:you forgot by Saib0t · · Score: 2
      I would rather get rid of him [saddam] now than wait 5 years when a missile is in the air and we all say, "damn, I guess he really did have a nuke."

      [sarcasm]
      I totally support that point of view:
      Let's kill all the people who we think could kill someone in the future, then we'll be safe.
      [/sarcasm]

      --

      One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
  24. The Real Effect of September 11 by michael · · Score: 5, Informative

    As the Associated Press summarizes them:

    Overview of Changes to Legal Rights
    By The Associated Press

    September 5, 2002, 11:44 AM EDT

    Some of the fundamental changes to Americans' legal rights by the Bush administration and the USA Patriot Act following the terror attacks:

    * FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: Government may monitor religious and political institutions without suspecting criminal activity to assist terror investigation.

    * FREEDOM OF INFORMATION: Government has closed once-public immigration hearings, has secretly detained hundreds of people without charges, and has encouraged bureaucrats to resist public records requests.

    * FREEDOM OF SPEECH: Government may prosecute librarians or keepers of any other records if they tell anyone that the government subpoenaed information related to a terror investigation.

    * RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION: Government may monitor federal prison jailhouse conversations between attorneys and clients, and deny lawyers to Americans accused of crimes.

    * FREEDOM FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES: Government may search and seize Americans' papers and effects without probable cause to assist terror investigation.

    * RIGHT TO A SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL: Government may jail Americans indefinitely without a trial.

    * RIGHT TO LIBERTY: Americans may be jailed without being charged or being able to confront witnesses against them.

    Copyright © 2002, The Associated Press

    Yay for liberty and freedom! We are Americans! Look how free we are!

    1. Re:The Real Effect of September 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


      Terrorists can only take my life. Only my government can take my freedom

    2. Re:The Real Effect of September 11 by elefantstn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah Michael, better barricade the door, the thought police are certainly on their way.

      Dude, even the most ignorant 13-year-old on Slashdot knows you're an idiot. Think about it.

      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    3. Re:The Real Effect of September 11 by donutello · · Score: 3, Insightful

      * FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: Government may monitor religious and political institutions without suspecting criminal activity to assist terror investigation.

      Seems like you don't understand the meaning of the words "Freedom of Association". You are still allowed to associate with whoever you want. There's nothing wrong with the government monitoring you while you're doing so - your freedom is not threatened.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    4. Re:The Real Effect of September 11 by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 2

      * FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: Government may monitor religious and political institutions without suspecting criminal activity to assist terror investigation.

      Seems like you don't understand the meaning of the words "Freedom of Association". You are still allowed to associate with whoever you want. There's nothing wrong with the government monitoring you while you're doing so - your freedom is not threatened.

      You're absolutely right that the FBI being able to "spy" on any organization without suspected criminal activity does not abridge the right to assembly. But it does threaten our freedom. This is the same organization that monitored what anti-war and civil-rights organizations were doing during the '60s. These organizations did not commit any crimes, but the FBI did use the information they gathered to blackmail individuals and disrupt their non-violent, non-criminal goals.

      Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    5. Re:The Real Effect of September 11 by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      There's nothing wrong with the government monitoring you while you're doing so - your freedom is not threatened.
      (Bold emphasis is mine.) You wrote the wrong word there -- what you probably meant was that there's nothing unconstitutional about the government monitoring you for no good reason. There IS something very wrong with the government monitoring you for no good reason. My rights may not be violated, but my freedom is very well threatened by the government monitoring me without a good reason.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    6. Re:The Real Effect of September 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it.

      No one ever learns....

  25. remembering the day by alancave · · Score: 1

    I think it is safe to say that this date is now a significant one... my only hope is that, as we remember the events of 9/11, that Americans especially do not trivialize this day in years to come. It could happen. 20 years from now, people could be having cook-outs and parades.

    That's what we Americans sometimes do - we forget what makes a day significant in the first place. Most people think of memorial day as a day off from work to go shopping...

    May we never forget, and may our children never know the experience again in their lifetime.

    --
    "If you and I always agreed, then one of us would be unnecessary."
  26. Looking back; looking foward. by Wingchild · · Score: 5, Interesting

    September 11th, 2001:

    I was consulting at a company in Rockville, a few miles outside the district. I heard the first plane had hit while I was listening to WGMS, DC's classical station; figured it for a Cessna or something. After I hit my desk I knew something was wrong when I couldn't hit a major news site for confirmation of the story.

    We switched the news on; we had a big TV with DirecTV on it in the company kitchen. I had stepped away to try and get word to friends about what had happened, using instant messenging apps, when the second plane hit.

    The people in our kitchen reached the instantaneous conclusion that this was not accidental. We watched as the towers burned, saw them fall, heard about the Pentagon being hit. My company employed 65 people there; were they okay?

    Workers left to take their children home. I left around 1pm, with F16s and helicopters covering the sky of the DC metro area.

    I called my family. They were trying to reach me but couldn't get through due to circuits being jammed. They were terrified that I was there; too many rumors, too little verification that day for us all.

    September 11th, 2002:

    Last November, my company deployed me to the Pentagon. It started out as one of those "for a week" things, but I wound up involved in a COOP project - Continuity of Operations - directly related to making sure a second 9/11 cannot cripple our nation's defense infrastructure. I'm sitting at my desk, thinking of how much the last year has affected my life (too much work, constant stress, a divorce..) and knowing that the majority of the things that have happened to me of late can be directly traced back to 9/11; were it not for that attack, I would not be where I am now.

    I do not know if things are for the better. All I know is that I have been called on to use my meager technical skills to help my country when it was sorely needed. I'm doing my part to make sure we make it through.

    Would that we all could do the same.

    1. Re:Looking back; looking foward. by bucephalis · · Score: 1

      "I do not know if things are for the better. All I know is that I have been called on to use my meager technical skills to help my country when it was sorely needed. I'm doing my part to make sure we make it through."

      Thanks.

  27. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Since the first 3000 died, many more have died in other places such as Afghanistan. Some no doubt deserved it, but many others were innocent civillians caught in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    However I'm glad you raised the point about the freedoms that have been lost. The US has become a little more like the non-free countries it is fighting with the government exploiting the opportunity to help hide its own inadequacies.

  28. A need to vent... by echucker · · Score: 2

    Naturally, the whole world needed a chance to vent about 9/11/01 in the days afterward. I find it interesting that 9/11/02 threads have also popped on my own board. I guess people need to vent about the remebrance, forced compliance to remembrance, or just a need to get away from all of the remembrance.

  29. My thoughts by rczyzewski · · Score: 0

    As an IS person, this has affected my job because we need to prepare a Disaster Recovery plan for SEC compliance. Also, more money and time has been put to basic security.
    Personally, it makes me sad when I see readers not care about the day or realize its significance. The events of 9/11 were one of the most significant of this country's history. I just hope it doesn't turn into another Labor Day-like weekend excuse for tourism to push school back even later, Hallmark selling crap, and people getting drunk without remembering why the country is mourning.
    My prayers go out to those NOT affected by 9/11, may they find peace in their souls and find the spirit of humanitarianism that many others have found.

  30. Where were you when the world changed? by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was in Manhattan, at the northern end of Central Park. I'd turned on the TV in my hotel room to catch a weather forecast, since I was due to visit a customer at 90 William Street - three blocks from the WTC - at 11, and wanted to know whether I'd need an umbrella.


    After seeing that it would be a nice, pretty day, I left the TV on. I was watching when they broke into the Today Show to report a fire at the WTC. I stayed glued to the TV as they showed the second airplane crashing into the other tower, and the fires raging, and people jumping out of windows, and the towers collapsing, and the resulting images are forever graven into my mind.


    Early on, I dialed up with my laptop. I wasn't one of the folks besieging Slashdot, but I did stay on IRC for hours, talking about what I saw. That turned out to be my only reliable communications channel. My cellphone was completely useless. I got more than a few phone calls from anxious relatives that I couldn't return because the lines were jammed. I finally asked a friend to call my parents in Houston and let them know I was fine and several miles away.


    This past July 4 weekend, a friend and I visited Mount Rushmore. At the end of the day, we went to one of the Western dinner theater places out there. Most of the way through the show, they sang a song, "Where Were You When the World Changed?", about that day. I wound up having to leave in tears, as it brought back memories of that day, and how I couldn't get in touch with anyone except over the net. I don't know who wrote it (I asked, but have since forgotten the name - it was some country star), but he did a great job of capturing the feeling for the rest of us.

    --
    Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    1. Re:Where were you when the world changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The song was "Where were you when the world stopped turning?" written and sung by Alan Jackson.

    2. Re:Where were you when the world changed? by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      You're correct. Thanks.

      The lyrics, and a snippet of audio, can be found at Alan Jackson's web site.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
  31. I'm tired by Apreche · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    of being reminded of 9/11. Yes it was horrible. Yes lets hope it never happens again. But let's not remind every single person of it every single day. I don't think a day has gone by in the last year where someone or something hasn't mentioned 9/11. Even those days where I almsot got by somebody would say something like "in this post 9/11 world..."
    I just want everyone to give it up already. You don't see me talking about the holocaust every day. Because everythign is so different in "this post holocaust world"

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:I'm tired by Kortec · · Score: 1

      I must say that i agree with you. I think the time has come to move on. Not to forget but to not only think of that when ever we hear a plane or a thunder-clap. Don't label me as insensitve, I mearly feel taht we cannot heal untill we move on. Moreover i think that its time to put a stop to this anti-terrorism witchhunt. Granted there are terrorists out and about in the world and they should be tracked down, but in today's world any faction can gain governmental support by claiming to fight terrorism. Let's not do salem (circa 1603) all over again, ok folks?

      --
      "My heart is in the work." - Andrew Carnegie
  32. Thanks, Slashdot by uk_greg · · Score: 1

    Like many of us, I was at work when the attacks occurred, and once I found out what was going on, went to the major news web sites for more information (remember, the inital reports were simply that a plane had struck one of the World Trade Center Towers). Of course, by that time, the major news sites were inaccessible due to the amount of traffic.

    Until I was able to get to a TV to get more details, Slashdot was my main source of information on the events of the day, and IIRC, it did a pretty good job of keeping up to date on what had happened.

    So thanks, everyone - the editors and the readers that posted with information that day. Good work was done here a year ago today.

    And turning off the banner ads today is a class move, especially in light of so many other companies' crass attempts at merchandising 9/11.

    1. Re:Thanks, Slashdot by riggwelter · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more, I'm also in the UK, and on ethis day last year, it was like the world stood still. The only source of information we had has Slashdot, until we found the right point in the office to get a semi-crackly version of Five Live on the radio.
      The coverage here was measured and responsible, compare and contrast with the sensationalist-tabloid nature of some of the mainstream press coverage at the time.
      I don't know if it's because it was mostly the usual /. crowd, or if it's because you've got some seriously serious hardware, but you withstood the pressure of all them clicks when CNN et al just collapsed.
      At the end of my working day, thanks to Slashdot and the BBC, I was pretty well up to speed with what was going on, and was able to fill in a friend we had round for dinner that evening with accurate information. We're Christians, but we normally would just eat and chat when we have a guest. That night we prayed and prayed and prayed for you guys in the States, and for peace. We ill do the same tonight with our cell group.

      --
      Listening for the sound of the coming rain...
  33. One thing hasn't changed... by southpolesammy · · Score: 2

    The net is sufficiently clobbered again today.

    You'd like to believe that since the 9/11 events of last year that the major news carriers would have learned that during a huge event like this that people are going to try to find out news and information as frequently as possible, and that having the infrastructure to handle the traffic would be worth their while. But it seems that this hasn't happened quite yet.

    Of course, the amount of people coming online every year increases probably faster than the infrastructure can keep up, but it seems some things never change...

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    1. Re:One thing hasn't changed... by rufo · · Score: 1

      I just checked CNN, MSNBC, Yahoo! News, ABC News and Fox News' websites, and all of them came up in a snap. There's something wrong with your connection.

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    2. Re:One thing hasn't changed... by southpolesammy · · Score: 2

      Looks like it has gotten better since around 8-9am EDT this morning. It also could be my connection, as you say...wouldn't surprise me any....

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  34. They're not making money today by wiredog · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Since they're not running any commercials.

    For that matter, they didn't run commercials for two or three days after the attacks.

    1. Re:They're not making money today by Coplan · · Score: 5, Interesting
      They won't make money now....but they will later on.

      It's an image ploy. It's kinda like offering "Shindler's List" without commercials a couple of years ago. Everyone thinks they're a nice network...so they're more likely to watch in the future. It sounds silly, but it is a common ploy in the media.

      Our newspaper published today without any ads. A friend at the paper told me that its a nice thought, to the public...but to advertise for the next month, it's going to be much more expensive to "cover the costs of today's paper". In actuality...the paper makes out in the long run. I wouldn't put it past the TV networks to do something similar.

    2. Re:They're not making money today by aengblom · · Score: 2

      If the newspaper could make more money by charging more for the ads... it would have already done so. Think about it.

      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    3. Re:They're not making money today by Coplan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      They would need an excuse. That's why they predict they'll only be able to do it for a month or so.

      On a normal day, in a normal year...if a newspaper said "we want X amount of money for a full page ad", a business would question the price. In fact, they probably still would. But this time the paper replies "Oh, we had to increase costs slightly for a while to cover the cost of the ad-free newspaper we published on 9/11/02". What's a company going to say to that? I'm sure some companies won't buy that. But many would probably simply eat the cost so long as there is a reason.

    4. Re:They're not making money today by RedX · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      It's an image ploy. It's kinda like offering "Shindler's List" without commercials a couple of years ago. Everyone thinks they're a nice network...so they're more likely to watch in the future.

      Which network was that again? ;-)

    5. Re:They're not making money today by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      It's kinda like offering "Shindler's List" without commercials a couple of years ago.

      Actually Schindler's List did have commercials...one specifically. The show was sponsored by Ford.

      The one commercial was simply the Blue Oval on a back background for the 3-6 intermission in the middle. No sound, just an understated presence.

      Classy, tasteful, and extremely appropriate. I couldn't tell you for certain who advertised in various things, but I will always remember that Ford sponsored the showing of Schindler's List.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    6. Re:They're not making money today by aengblom · · Score: 2
      That's "witch trial" logic. If she floats, she's a witch. If she sinks, she is with god now.

      Which choice should the media make?
      • Look in depth at this tragedy and mark it the only way it knows how... telling the stories of the day. Also write off ads for the day.
      • Fill up the page/screen with ads and make little original content


        • By your logic, the later is correct. I fail to see how this is better for anyone
      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    7. Re:They're not making money today by sporty · · Score: 2

      Is it possible to stop thinking about what evils there are today? I know it doesn't seem like the biggest deal they shut off their ads. Live and let live, eh?

      It's their little tribute. Let them have it and if you don't like it, that's ok. I kinda like it. Right now, today is all about me and just getting things straight in my head. I'll still think of slashdot as only an outlet and not a place to have many intelligent conversations, but let those of us who choose to acknowledge what they've done as something nice.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    8. Re:They're not making money today by Zoop · · Score: 2

      It's an image ploy.

      So, if they run commecials, they're greedy bastards who take advantage of it. If they don't run commercials, they are greedy bastards who take advantage of it.

      There's no pleasing you unless they just close up shop and go away. I'm curious...do you give away all money above and beyond what you need to stay alive and go to work? I mean, you don't need a TV, a VCR, a DVD, or a computer. Why not give them up and give the extra money to the poor? Have the courage of your convictions instead of expecting everyone else to do it for you.

    9. Re:They're not making money today by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but who's going to want to advertise today?

      "This program was brought to you by Subway... Eat Fresh[tm], and God Bless America!" directly followed by a replay of the planes hitting? I don't think so.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    10. Re:They're not making money today by Coplan · · Score: 2
      How about my actions last year...

      I took my entire salary for the month of September and donated it to a number of orginzations that previously existed for tragedy relief, or orginizations that were created for releif from 9-11 -- in all, about $8,000 (USD). My logic was that I had the money to pay my bills, and I didn't need anything else...so why not give to the families that truly suffered.

      There is another newspaper near me that has special ads for the day. To place an ad in the newspaper was free for today...with one exception. To place an ad, you had to donate a certain amount of money to a charity orginization, and your ad had to explain somewhere where the money went. What happened is that a lot of businesses took up their ad space to basically show tribute to those who died, and in very tiny text at the bottom, they stated who they were. This was satisfactory to me.

      Fear not...I'm not one who criticizes with a hypocritical nature.

    11. Re:They're not making money today by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1
      Well, is it to say if they are not making money they are losing money?

      If fact, there is actual costs for a special 9/11 insert, special broadcast, etc... So, someone must be paid to direct, produce, research, interview, typeset, film, etc...

      Is it you feel everyone should work on a special issue for free? Work a couple months on the subject without eating anything else than what his citizen fellows are willing to throw in his hat at the street corner?

      Come on! We are interested in this commemoration and are willing to spend some money to have someone working on a special issue for your local newspaper or favorite magazine. You would like to have the opinion of this personnality or this politician or just the guy beside you. That's the main reason you are reading /. right now!

      So, why shouldn't anybody make money in order to provide the service you are asking for?

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    12. Re:They're not making money today by Thorkytel+Ant-Head · · Score: 1

      Hm. Sounds like an image ploy to me.

    13. Re:They're not making money today by bfandreas · · Score: 0

      And if you buy special 911 memorabila, some amount may be a donation, the rest (minus distribution & manufacturing) is profit. Funny thing is, donations aren't needed anymore. After 911 they had a serious problem of distributing all the cash that flowed in at an astounding rate.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
  35. i dont know sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this lump in my throat will be here every September 11. Funny that all the time I've had to adjust and cope with this seems to melt off when I think about the significance of the day or even see a flag. It sucks, I have no other way to describe it. Plain sucks. Even know I have those semi-tears, little bastards that just cling to the edge of your eye while you swear that you can conduct yourself in a manner befitting your age. Well fuck. That anger is still inside too. To everyone then, and God bless....

  36. Beware by mirko · · Score: 0, Troll

    One year after, many doubts have surfaced and the legitimity of the US president isn't actually certain.

    You accused Oussama bin Laden of such a tragedy but where are your evidences ?
    No, I don't mean these tapes that appear on CNN on a regular basis.

    You also want to invade Iraq, which is your problem because there's nothing less certain that this will help you.

    I don't want to speak about "conspiracy theories", here because I actually feel sorry for the victims of 911.

    I'd just want you to think about it twice before starting a World War. This is not a fair war because you'll be bombing innocent people while other angry people will suddenly begin attacking you as a reaction.

    This is also something that will ruin your economy.

    So, if this story is about friendship, then, take it as from a friend : stop this war, stop Bush.

    A guy that asks his lawyers whether he may bypass your congress in order to "open the Gate of Hell" is not a trustworthy leader.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:Beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You accused Oussama bin Laden of such a tragedy but where are your evidences ?
      No, I don't mean these tapes that appear on CNN on a regular basis.


      Hrm, so tape of him applauding the attacks and TALKING ABOUT HOW HE PLANNED THEM is not evidence...

      You also want to invade Iraq, which is your problem because there's nothing less certain that this will help you.

      What? That sentence doesn't make sense. But yes, Saddam needs out. He's a thorn in the world's side, lying to the UN, lying to the world. He needs to be removed once and for all. Everyone knows it, but only the US has the nerve to actually do something to make the world better. But then again, that's how it always is, isn't it?

      I'd just want you to think about it twice before starting a World War.

      World War? Does any intelligent person actually think this would start a world war? And if it did, you know who's shoulders it would be on, the people who attack the Towers. They started the war.

      This is not a fair war because you'll be bombing innocent people while other angry people will suddenly begin attacking you as a reaction.

      "Fair War"? That's a completely naive point of view. War is WAR. People die. Innocent and non-innocent alike. You have to look at what the results will be. Innocent soldiers from the US will likely die attacking Iraq, but it's a cost that must be paid.

      This is also something that will ruin your economy.

      Sacrifices must be made. And most would make this one willingly.

      Plus anyone who looks at history would know that war stimulates the economy.

      So, if this story is about friendship, then, take it as from a friend : stop this war, stop Bush.

      The war is necessary, and long overdue. Bush was the right president at the right time. He may be wrong on other issues, but he is completely on the mark here. Thank goodness we don't have a president without backbone right now.

      A guy that asks his lawyers whether he may bypass your congress in order to "open the Gate of Hell" is not a trustworthy leader.

      "Open the Gate of Hell"? Who the hell are you, one of Saddam's PR people? Please, this will be nothing. Saddam is a little whining idiot. He'll be wiped out and nothing will come of it. The day after he's dead no one will notice the difference. I'll still be playing Warcraft 3, and my friends here at work will still be playing in their baseball league. No change at all.

    2. Re:Beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is also something that will ruin your economy.

      Historically, wars are very good for an economy. And jsut think, the US economy has nearly stalled. Go GW!

    3. Re:Beware by mirko · · Score: 1

      Your full of hatred, there's no use to argue.
      I'll just quote your last sentence :

      "Open the Gate of Hell"? Who the hell are you, one of Saddam's PR people?

      No, I was quoting the actual word from some arab representative, published in the european press some days ago, of course, you might not read the press, you have CNN and the Disney Channel.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    4. Re:Beware by mirko · · Score: 1

      read this.
      don't mind the name but what they wrote.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    5. Re:Beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your full of hatred, there's no use to argue.

      Because I don't believe the way you do? Because I don't by the bull**** coming out of Saddam's mouth?

      I noticed you still had no response to the proof of evidence. Osama admited ON TAPE that he was behind the attacks. What more do people need?

      I suppose if you support him you would dismiss it though...

    6. Re:Beware by mirko · · Score: 1

      I noticed you still had no response to the proof of evidence. Osama admited ON TAPE that he was behind the attacks. What more do people need?

      Is it really him, on this tape ?

      Reminds me of some famous Nessie photo which were taken far from the Loch Ness.

      I suppose if you support him you would dismiss it though...

      why should I support him ?
      Are you implying that if I am against your ennemies, then I am with them ?

      if this is the case, then I guess you are really working to close to computers as anything is not binary.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    7. Re:Beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wanted to sent you a mighty

      FUCK YOU!

      May you, and your children, in whatever terrible nation you live in, rot in hell

    8. Re:Beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >
      And his folks giving interviews to Al-Jazeera describing their involvement? Are they urban legends? His praising of the attacks on MANY tapes? Coincidence?

      No...it must be a jewish conspiracy. Come on...say it..that's really what you believe...

      >
      Not implying, saying. You ARE the enemy.

    9. Re:Beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if he lives in america ?
      and why was he modded as a troll ?

  37. Credit where it is due (apart from the days heros) by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It was clear that /. was a exceptional source of information that day. Every news site got hammered with hits and even the top ones crumbled under the presure.

    Despite this site slowing to a crawl itself, thanks for posting the news early and allowing those not near a television to follow the tragic events.

    ---
    interested in inventions?

  38. Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by Yakman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, it's a year later and still we don't know where Osama bin Laden is, it seems we've forgotten about Afghanistan and now Bush is getting ready to pre-emptively attack Iraq. From what I've read about Saddam Hussein he doesn't just sit around in one place either, so what happens when they can't find him?

    What is it with all these stories coming out now about how Iraq could have nuclear weapons in like 30-40 seconds? Seriously though, a few months ago they were saying "2-3 years", now it's down to "6 months" or less. Are they making excuses to attack Iraq? Can't it be argued that the US is also a country with weapons of mass destruction and a warmongering leader?

    It is a shame that civilians died in the terrorist attacks, but what about the civilians the US has killed in Afghanistan, like that wedding - they excuse it by saying some collateral damage is to be expeced. Why do they say that the 'terrorist' attacks were "cowardly"? It'd take a fairly brave and strong willed person to willingly fly themselves into a building. If they were cowardly they'd just talk about how they were going to attack America but do nothing about it.

    What is it with removing all images of the WTC from movies etc in the last year?! It happened, we all know it happened. Removing the WTC from media I would think is an insult to the victims, it's as if they're saying that the buildings never existed.

    Enough typing for me, flame away :) And remember, opinions are like arseholes - we all are one. Err, have one ;)

    1. Re:Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by AppyPappy · · Score: 2
      Why do they say that the 'terrorist' attacks were "cowardly"? It'd take a fairly brave and strong willed person to willingly fly themselves into a building. If they were cowardly they'd just talk about how they were going to attack America but do nothing about it.

      They were cowards because they knowingly attacked civilians. Unlike the Afghan wedding, the WTC attack was not an accident. It was specifically targeted in order to kill as many civilians as possible. The US does not specifically target civilians. If we did, the Iraqis would not have been standing outside watching cruise missiles go down the street.


      There is a difference. If the terrorists had a nuclear device aimed at your town, you wouldn't be alive. The US does and doesn't use it.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    2. Re:Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They say Iraq *could* build a nuclear weapon in 6 months *if* it got hold of enough weapons grade nuclear material. I'm pretty sure any group of reasonably talented engineers could build a rudimentary nuclear bomb given enough fissile material.

    3. Re:Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by Knightfall · · Score: 1

      Oh what the hell ... I'll bite.

      So we don't know where Osama is ... you have my email address and my IP address. Do you know where I am? Probably not. And I am stationary (too much so). Imagine if you had much less information, what little you had was most likely laced with untruths, and your target was constantly moving (I am of course assuming he is actually alive which is getting more and more doubtful). The fact that we do not know where he is should be moot. We know where a lot of the terrorist cells are and they do more damage than him. There are many more leaders than just him.

      2-3 Years, 6 months, 48 hours. It doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. Nuclear, maybe, maybe not, but they do have many more much more horrible ones and a leader that is not the least be hesitant to use them. Given the choice of being vaporized by a nuclear blast or watching my body melt from the inside out from a gas attack, I'll take the former. This country and many others are actively supporting the deaths of innocent people all over the world. Our leader uses force in a reactionary role. And if you don't think attacking Iraq is part of the reactionary process perhaps you need to read up on Saddam's record of supporting violence against the U.S.

      Calling the attackers brave and strong willed is insane. They were brainwashed cowards acting out blanant 1st degree murder on innocent men, women, and CHILDREN. It is absolute madness to suggest people that would willingly attack innocent civilians are anything but murderous cowards.

      I agree with you that removing the WTC images from ads and movies was perhaps not the most appropriate action. It was a kneeejerk reaction to help ease the immediate pain, but it also took what could have been grand last memories of the glorious structures away from us. As I did not directly loose anyone close to me in the attack and I can not for one moment suggest how seeing the images in movies and ads featuring the towers (I still have the Spider Man clip should the helicopter stuck in a web between the towers) would feel.

      This was not meant to be a flame, and I apologize if it came out that way.

      --


      Knightfall
    4. Re:Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by frAme57 · · Score: 1
      In my (completely unsupported by objective facts or first hand knowledge) opinion, the current fervor about Iraq must be some sort of smokescreen. Maybe it is to cloak the US's real plans for the Middle East.

      Maybe the situation in Afghanistan is falling apart and Bush wants to keep our attention away from there. If he keeps the media focused on Iraq, they will keep Americans focused on Iraq. Maybe its something much more sinister, or much more inept.

      All I know is that it feels like we're having a war marketed to us - as though it was an upcoming movie or new line of car. Usually wars are fought for more clearly compelling reasons than...

      dramatic music

      He was evil in 1991

      dramatic music

      Now he is part of the Axis of Evil(TM)

      dramatic music

      See Tex Bush put Saddam Hussein in his place in

      crescendo

      DESERT STORM, THE SEQUEL

      BTW, just out of curiosity, can you name any specific instances of the WTC being edited out of movies or TV shows? I heard it might happen, and other parts of the NYC skyline have been getting more attention than they used to. But I have not yet noticed any scenes where the towers were actually edited out.

      --
      "In a hierarchy every employee will rise to his level of incompetence". The Peter Principle
    5. Re:Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They were cowards because they knowingly attacked civilians

      So was the crew of the Enola Gay. Over 200,000 killed in the worst terrorist attacks in history. Tokyo would have been nuked two days later. If that isn't terrorism I don't know what is.

    6. Re:Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason Islamic terrorists attacked the WTC more than once; it's the most visible symbol of George Bush Snr's 'New World Order' economic apparatus. You don't have to be sympathising with the enemy to see why some of the countries in the Middle East could be unhappy with American trade policy over the last 30 years or so.

    7. Re:Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What absolute ignorance.

      First of all, we were already at war with Japan thanks to their unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor. That was an act of terrorism.

      Second, the supposedly 200,000 who eventually died from the bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved the lives of millions that would have died if the US had to continue the war in the Pacific and eventually attack mainland Japan.

      You can hate the US all you want but there is a huge difference between ending a war and starting a war.

    8. Re:Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do they say that the 'terrorist' attacks were "cowardly"? It'd take a fairly brave and strong willed person to willingly fly themselves into a building. If they were cowardly they'd just talk about how they were going to attack America but do nothing about it.


      So you WOULD stab me in the back rather than call me out in the street to fight?

    9. Re:Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by Oggust · · Score: 1
      It is a shame that civilians died in the terrorist attacks, but what about the civilians the US has killed in Afghanistan, like that wedding - they excuse it by saying some collateral damage is to be expeced. Why do they say that the 'terrorist' attacks were "cowardly"? It'd take a fairly brave and strong willed person to willingly fly themselves into a building. If they were cowardly they'd just talk about how they were going to attack America but do nothing about it.

      Now, in a war (police action, whatever - when there's military force involved), some collateral damage is to be expected. If you're not, you're fooling yourself or someone else.

      One interesting thing though - The wrong people always gets blamed for these things. If you park your anti-aircraft gun next to a wedding party and start shooting at enemy aircraft, if the party-goers are killed when that aircraft bombs you, that's not the pilot's fault - it's yours.

      That's not how it gets reported though, the media tells it as if the aircraft attacked the party, and implies that it was done on puropse.

      The media (as a whole) should probably read up on this stuff a bit.

      /August.

      --
      "An object declared as type _Bool is large enough to store the values 0 and 1." -- 6.1.2.5, C99 standard.
    10. Re:Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by Yakman · · Score: 2
      So you WOULD stab me in the back rather than call me out in the street to fight?

      Sure, if my objective was to kill you then that would definately be the better alternative. Or maybe i've been playing too much of the "Hitman 2" Demo :)

    11. Re:Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the case could be argued that Al-Queda thought they were at war with America.

      I still see no difference.

      Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the biggest acts of terrorism ever. And they targeted civilians.

  39. A few points by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Personally my heart goes out to those people who suffered losses and pain this time last year. I wish them all the very best.

    However, I do think it is worth as this point reflecting on the foreign policy of sucessive US governments, that is the governments that have helped create Saddam's milirary might, backed the Talibans rise to power, backed Israel and other Pro-American Arab reigems which suppress their own people and finally (especially for us Brits) helped fund the IRA - who have been systimatically blowing up and killing people in both the UK and Ireland for well over 20 years.

    George Bush stated that last year was when the world rose up to fight against terrorism. In fact, the world has been rising up and fighting terrorism for over 20 years and had it not been for September 11th, the US would still have not been involved.

    I'm not using these points as an excuse for what the Taliban did. Any group that carries out such a thing are despicable - but I believe that the US Goverment should stand back and reflect all the possible concequences of what their policy of meddling in (and funding of) hardline groups of individuals in other countries could bring about.

    I observed a minutes silence today, both for the innocent victims of September 11th and for the innocent victims of the future who will suffer when the US seeks to take revenge.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:A few points by Silverhammer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Blockquoth the poster:

      ...but I believe that the US Goverment should stand back and reflect all the possible concequences of what their policy of meddling in (and funding of) hardline groups of individuals in other countries could bring about.

      If we don't "meddle," we're called isolationists. If we do "meddle," we're called imperialists. Fuck it, we just can't win.

    2. Re:A few points by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any society that is not willing or able to go to war to protect it's citizens will eventually disappear from the earth. History has proven this time and again.

      To call this "revenge" is simply ignorant. All nations, including the big, bad United States, have inalienable right to self-defense. Yes, innocent people will die. Innocent people have already died. But if we don't take responsibility for our own safety, and do something about it now, many, many more innocent people will die. If Neville Chamberlain had accepted this responsibility, Hitler may very well have been stopped at the Polish border. If we had actually done something about Al Queda after the African embassy and U.S.S. Cole bombings, 9/11 might never have happened. If we don't do something about it now, we condem our own citizens to death.

    3. Re:A few points by xA40D · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fuck it, we just can't win.

      Yes you can win. You can admit that the fundamental rights that all American have are the same fundamendal rights ALL the people of the world can expect. And then try to help and support other contries - instead of bombing and invading.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    4. Re:A few points by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

    5. Re:A few points by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      I believe that the US Goverment should stand back and reflect all the possible concequences of what their olicy of meddling in (and funding of) hardline groups of individuals in other countries could bring about.

      No argument here from me, but even when the US Government does start considering possible long-term consequences of its foreign policy decisions, there will be a certain degree of "damned if you do, damned if you don't."

      So the US supported the Shah of Iran? If the Shah hadn't had so much power, fundamental Islamist opposition would have never developed!

      What if the US had not supported the Shah? Fundamental Islamist movements would have been allowed to develop unopposed!

      Predicting the future is always a difficult job, and no one can ever understand every possible ramification of one's present actions, but the US Gov't certainly could do better than they have in the past.

    6. Re:A few points by PhilHibbs · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Fuck it, we just can't win.
      Well spotted. That's the price of being the world's only superpower. We had our turn when we had the world's greatest empire, everyone blamed us for everything (not that they weren't sometimes right, of course).
    7. Re:A few points by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 2

      Changing our foreign policy in the wake of an attack will only provoke more attacks. Learn a little about the evolution of terrorist attacks. When terrorists took Israel's Olympic team hostage, they didn't listen to demands, they tried to gun them down. The terrorists murdered the team, but all support for their cause was lost. That type of terrorist attack has stopped. It was only recently that they started suicide bombings, and then saying "here I am, come and get me." Which is supposed to frustrate and anger the population into changning their policy. Want more terrorists attacks? Prove that the method they're using works. I think the voters should have more say in our government than terrorist fanatics.

    8. Re: A few points by ickle_matt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You bastards have been systematically killing, imprisoning, and torturing the Irish for centuries.

      Yes we did, in the past. Then we grew up and worked out that you can't just go around bombing the crap out of people who disagree with you or have resources you want.

      The only way to actually solve the problems that cause situations like NI, 911 and every other fsckup in the history of mankind is to find out what the problems really are, discuss them and reach a compromise which is agreeable to both parties. Most other civilised countries have worked this out too - why hasn't the US?

    9. Re:A few points by Yaruar · · Score: 2

      Does the right to self defence thus allow Saddam Hussain to send out a strikeforce against the US? Bush has publicly stated he wants to kill the Iraqi leader, therefore can Saddam legitimately now launch a strike against the US?

      Serious question.

      --
      Working for the (other) man
    10. Re: A few points by andyt · · Score: 1

      You bastards have been systematically killing, imprisoning, and torturing the Irish for centuries.
      Ah, they love it really. Little minxes.

    11. Re:A few points by lauchlinj · · Score: 1

      I agree with much of this. The US has supported groups for its own "plan" or the world, which has led to much of these problems. Many of the world hate the US Government's views and politics in the world. I, myself, hate them somewhat. Who are we to enforce things on other nations? The biggest thing on my mind, is that we lost so many lives that day, but every day in other parts of the world, particularly in the Middle East, many people lose their lives. Yes, the motives are different, but the US being involved over there is what led to the whole thing. Why doesn't somebody suggest September 11 as being a WORLD holiday. Having a day to remember all the victims of terror and violence in the world would be a wonderful thing. And when so many other nations spent those few weeks and months after the attacks, sending us their condolences and such, we owe them that much. We should be remembering all the victims of violence, not just our own country's. I, for one, intend on doing this, as much as possible in my little part of the world. Over 3,000 people died on that day in the US, but so many others have died in a similar fashion and deserve the same thoughts and prayers. May the victims of violence all over the world rest in peace and help us remember how horrible this violence has been.

    12. Re:A few points by superyooser · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In fact, the world has been rising up and fighting terrorism for over 20 years and had it not been for September 11th, the US would still have not been involved.

      This is an excellent point. For those accusing the United States of "dragging the whole world into war," please take note. This is the way it always is. If there is a true accusation of evil against the U.S., it is that we have not acted swiftly and thoroughly enough in going to war against terrorists (i.e. Hitler, Hussein, bin Laden).

      War has been waged against us by stealth and deceit and murder. This nation is peaceful, but fierce when stirred to anger. This conflict was begun on the timing and terms of others. It will end in a way, and at an hour, of our choosing.

      President George W. Bush, The National Cathedral, Remarks at National Day of Prayer and Remembrance, September 14, 2001
      We are not war-mongers. We never enjoy the taking of life, but removing threatening, unbridled corruption from the earth is the sober duty of a moral people.
    13. Re:A few points by mcwop · · Score: 2
      We do help and support other countries. Examples:
      • Through the U.S. Agency for International Development the United States provides $62 million in aid for health care, water system repairs and emergency food
      • US food aid to Africa
      • Natural disaster aid (e.g. aid to central america after Hurricane)

      Sometimes the help is military. Example: Balkans. So no, we can't win no matter how much good we do or try to do.
      --

      "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    14. Re:A few points by lordmage · · Score: 1

      Invading, Bombing.. Hmmmm.

      A few things about military might. Military is a form of diplomacy that should be used as a last resort. Military is seen as a strength, as well as a weakness.

      Everyone has the fundamental rights of US, then the US government has the fundamental rights to protect those rights.. including arresting, executing, those that oppress others.

      See, your point has a problem. No one sees that they have the same rights as US citizens, or other freer countries. In fact, they try and take rights from the ones that have MORE than they do.

      Do you think 9/11 was in retaliation for Isreal? Britian was the main component of that, yet they were not attacked.

      Do you think 9/11 was in retaliation for Troops on Saudi Soil? Why not attack the Government of SA, since they Allow it to happen.

      Do you think 9/11 was in retailiation for Iraqi childrens deaths? The US is part of a multi-nation embargo, including many Muslem countries.

      Pure and simple, 9/11 was in retaliation for the culture of free ideas, and free flow of information. The fear that those who oppress others have to "TRUTH" or even the exchange of radical ideas is amazing. A radical idea being that women dont have to wear barkas.

      Jealousy, Fear, Power.. all of that goes into it.

      Besides, your last point. The US invaded 1 country that they should not have (Vietnam), and what other country have they "invaded" without being attacked first?

      Grenada? Safety of US Citizens, which proved to be the case.
      Panama? Removal of a major drug lord?
      Somalia? Feed the hungry (UN based)
      Bosnia? Save the Muslems (UN based)
      Kuwait? Requested, and UN based.

      I still dont see a real reason not to attack any of them except vietnam (which was stupid).

      --
      I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
    15. Re:A few points by Simeon2000 · · Score: 1

      ... he's more than welcome to _TRY_...

      --
      warn "Just Another Perl User" if $anyone_cares;
    16. Re:A few points by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      Can you give specifics? This sounds beautiful and wonderful, but I have never heard an arguement like this that ever came with a plausible set of steps for achieving anything.

      It would seem that our supporting of other countries is why we are blaimed for 'bringing this on ourselves". Either we helped 'the bad guys' or we pissed off the 'bad guys' by helping their enemies.

      Dan

    17. Re:A few points by xA40D · · Score: 2

      United States provides $62 million

      Whoopee. $62 Million. Better than nothing, but $0.17 per citizen strikes me as a platry amount.

      By 2005 the UK will be contributing $9.9 BILLION to overseas aid. That's $165 per citizen for overseas aid.

      So no, we can't win no matter how much good we do or try to do

      Claiming that you can't "win" is nothing more than a self fulfilling prophecy.

      The United States of America is the only country to have ever put a man on the moon. IMHO the country that could acheive this is more than capable of "winning" on the international stage.

      All that is missing is the will.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    18. Re:A few points by Silverhammer · · Score: 2

      Blockquoth the poster:

      Whoopee. $62 Million. Better than nothing, but $0.17 per citizen strikes me as a platry amount.

      The person to whom you're responding was mistaken on two counts. First, USAID's budget for 2002 was $7.8 billion, not $62 million.

      Second, USAID is only one small foreign policy agency dedicated to managing health programs, infrastructure, and emergency relief. If you also include food subsidies, technology grants, military assistance, loan guarantees, and a truckload of other stuff, the actual total amount put towards foreign aid is more like $80 billion per year.

      And then of course there's our trade deficit of $38 billion per month.

      So, in a given year, the United States basically gives away $530 billion to the rest of the world.

      Now tell me again about the UK's $9.9 billion...

    19. Re:A few points by Kwil · · Score: 1

      Do you think 9/11 was in retaliation for Isreal? Britian was the main component of that, yet they were not attacked.

      Was vs. Is.

      Who *is* the main aid/supporter of Israel's actions currently?

      Do you think 9/11 was in retaliation for Troops on Saudi Soil? Why not attack the Government of SA, since they Allow it to happen.

      Who's troops are they? Who is the main aid/supporter of the current regime of Saudi Arabia? Also, who is(was?) the less security conscious?

      Here's a quick thought: If you think the attacks were because of a free flow of ideas, then why not Britain? Why not France? Why not the Netherlands, Canada, Portugal, Brazil, Mexico, Australia, Ireland, Italy, or a host of others? You're no less free to express ideas in them -- and given the arrest of a man who was simply planning to build a bomb -- perhaps you're more free in them than you are in the U.S.

      To assume the reasons are cultural jealousy is just cultural arrogance.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    20. Re:A few points by Kwil · · Score: 1

      If we don't "meddle," we're called isolationists. If we do "meddle," we're called imperialists. Fuck it, we just can't win.

      And you won't either..
      At least.. not until you figure out the difference between "meddle" and "aid".

      Here's some hints - if you're doing something to another country that you wouldn't let be done to yours - you're meddling.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    21. Re:A few points by Silverhammer · · Score: 2

      Blockquoth the poster:

      Here's some hints - if you're doing something to another country that you wouldn't let be done to yours - you're meddling.

      Well, until another country actually offers aid to the U.S., we don't have much of a basis for comparison, do we?

    22. Re:A few points by xA40D · · Score: 2

      My point was based on erroneous information. I therefore withdraw my point. Although I don't really think counting your trade deficit really counts.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    23. Re:A few points by Silverhammer · · Score: 2

      Blockquoth the poster:

      Although I don't really think counting your trade deficit really counts.

      It most certainly does. There are entire national economies out there based solely on manufacturing consumer goods for the United States, or providing us with raw materials, or giving us some place nice to go for our vacations. Those nations would have no industry at all if not for us.

      Sure, it may just be more proof of our raging imperialism, but it's true.

    24. Re:A few points by xA40D · · Score: 2

      I think the comments of Kwil sum up my feeling rather well; and I couldn't have sumarised better:

      To assume the reasons are cultural jealousy is just cultural arrogance.

      But on the issue of invading and bombing I wasn't talking about history, I was talking about the future. About the desire of George W, and his lap-dog Tony Blair, to kick the fsck out of Iraq.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    25. Re:A few points by xA40D · · Score: 2

      Why doesn't somebody suggest September 11 as being a WORLD holiday

      You just did.

      And I second the motion.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    26. Re:A few points by xA40D · · Score: 2

      It most certainly does. There are entire national economies out there based solely on manufacturing consumer goods for the United States, or providing us with raw materials, or giving us some place nice to go for our vacations. Those nations would have no industry at all if not for us.

      Which is exactly why I don't think it counts.

      If anything it's a part of the problem.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    27. Re:A few points by xA40D · · Score: 2

      ... he's more than welcome to _TRY_...

      That is funny.

      But now read this.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    28. Re:A few points by Silverhammer · · Score: 2

      Blockquote the poster:

      Which is exactly why I don't think it counts.

      What's so hard to understand? Without us, they have no economy. Sounds like foreign aid to me. Or would you prefer we annex them outright?

      If anything it's a part of the problem.

      Okay then, starting tomorrow, it all stops. We will build a wall 30 miles high all the way around the entire country and not one atom will go in or out. No immigration, no trade, no technology, no culture, nothing.

    29. Re:A few points by rossz · · Score: 2
      You can admit that the fundamental rights that all American have are the same fundamendal rights ALL the people of the world can expect.

      I've always believed this very thing. The Bill of Rights is a wonderful thing that should not apply exclusively to our corner of the world. However, there are far too many evil bastards in the world with too much power. They see the general population is something to be tolerated so long as they do what they are told.

      Usually, the only way to get rid of these thugs is to kill them, which involves going through their army. War is a bad thing. Sometimes not making war is worse.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    30. Re:A few points by xA40D · · Score: 2

      Okay then, starting tomorrow, it all stops. We will build a wall 30 miles high all the way around the entire country and not one atom will go in or out. No immigration, no trade, no technology, no culture, nothing.

      funny man.

      I'm not a fool. I know just how much the world economy depends on the US. But some people are just too stupid. They don't think "I have a job thanks to the US". They merely resent the fact they can't have what you have.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    31. Re:A few points by ladedodeda · · Score: 1

      Its a bit cavalier to assume American fundamental rights should be applied to ALL the people in the world. Although you personally may believe in the fundamental rights provided to you as a US Citizen (ha!), that doesn't mean our rights, and our value system should be implemented globally. Although I agree that bombing and invading isn't an option that should be supported by our government, political and cultural invasion can have similar consequences. Historically, the applying of a democratic value system to countries that were culturally and socially incompatible with that sort of poltical/cultural system fostered instability and in some cases recurring political chaos. (Look at the somewhat recent events in Africa...and dozens of other historical examples of political chaos surrounding failed implementations of democracy..) It took the US 200 years, and thousands of years of historical development before that, to arrive at a what some people call a successful democracy...but that doesn't mean we should go "help" other countries see things our way, because in many cases, our way might be flawed.

    32. Re:A few points by Fjord · · Score: 1

      It doesn' count because we gain from that trade. Buying stuff from people isn't aide, it's buying stuff. I don't fed the people at Hot Topic out of good will, I do it because I like their clothes and want to own them.

      --
      -no broken link
    33. Re:A few points by Kwil · · Score: 1
      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    34. Re:A few points by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 2

      Don't you think he would if he could?!? Don't you think he's trying to figure out a way to do it right now? Hell, he already tried to kill Bush Sr., i'm sure he's got guys working on the problem 24/7.

      Besides, when it comes to dictators, legitimacy is not a concern. Saddamn doesn't care what the international community thinks of him, he's a tyrant. He's going to do everything in his power to get as much as he can, by any means necessary. And if we don't do everything we can to protect ourselves from those kinds of people, we won't be around much longer to debate the finer points of international relations.

    35. Re:A few points by geekee · · Score: 1

      Well, from the Nazi point of view, we were probably meddling on D-Day. Shows you how well your theory holds water. A real test is, Are we protecting the freedom of individuals by our actions, or are we subjecting them to our will. The average person in Afghanistan would say the we did the former there. Same in Kuwait.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    36. Re:A few points by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      It isn't reasonable to talk about what the world would be like if the US were suddenly not there - as the saying goes, if it didn't exist, you'd have to invent it. If there were no US, then there would be another country with similar influence and power; there wouldn't just be a big US-shaped hole. Also, don't underestimate how much of the US's power and influence is due to the rest of the world trading with you, enabling the amassing of wealth that you seem to be rather good at. And if your borders were closed, you wouldn't have gotten access to all those German scientists that created the space programme. They'd've been working on the Nazi space programme instead. =:-O

    37. Re:A few points by mcwop · · Score: 2

      $62 million was just to the Palestinians, which I mistakenly forgot to add.

      --

      "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    38. Re:A few points by lordmage · · Score: 1

      Cultural Jealousy. The US is the big dog on the block, thus people are jealous.

      When someone gets power, they get pulled down by others no matter how good (or bad) they are. History has shown us this.

      --
      I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
    39. Re:A few points by lordmage · · Score: 1

      Well, unless bush dictator proves his case to me, a citizen of the US, I will not support an attack on Iraq.

      Our country is supposed to be based on the free flow of ideas (yes), and the representation of the people. If the leaders keep secrets and waste our lives on the secrets, this is not working.

      As someone put it, Bush is not making his evidenciary case to the US because...
      He is afraid we may disagree. Well since he is not, I already disagree. If he does, I may change my mind. Risking ones life for others better have a darn good reason behind it.

      --
      I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
    40. Re:A few points by Silverhammer · · Score: 2

      Blockquoth the poster:

      It isn't reasonable to talk about what the world would be like if the US were suddenly not there - as the saying goes, if it didn't exist, you'd have to invent it. If there were no US, then there would be another country with similar influence and power; there wouldn't just be a big US-shaped hole.

      And once again the point is missed entirely. Or rather, the point is demonstrated perfectly even though the person has no clue he is demonstrating it.

    41. Re:A few points by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      That doesn't help me at all. Please enlighten me.

    42. Re:A few points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      German Scientists?
      Try Canadian Scientist. After the Avro Arrow project was cancelled by the canadian government, the most talented engineers in the world of aviation were dispersed. Many went to work on the US space program. There would have been no moon landing (before the Soviets, at least) without the Canadian engineers.

    43. Re:A few points by Simeon2000 · · Score: 1

      *rolls eyes*

      I'm seriously quaking behind my keyboard.

      --
      warn "Just Another Perl User" if $anyone_cares;
  40. Remember by His+Nastiness · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just want to say that I know there are going to be stupid, childish, disrespectful comments here and everywhere else any of us decide to look today but I just want to remind every /. reader that it may infuriate, frustrate and maybe even hurt you to see these "Anonymous Coward"'s do this but remember that this is precisely what makes this country great. Better than to be in China where you can be sure that every post has been moderated by your government and that names are being taken down. The freedom to be an idiot and insensitive is just as integral to every other part of our freedoms. Dont' let it get you mad (as it did me at first) just be thankful that we can even have a /. to say all of this at. And corporate or not I appreciate OSDN's gesture today and personally think the coverage in other media is appropriate. WOuld they do this in other countries that aren't as free as ours? I not sure they would.

  41. Please Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find a copy of Aviation Week and Space Technology Nov. 1 1999

    Read about the Payne Stewart plane crash.

    It will open your eyes!

  42. A small point... by dreadpiratemark · · Score: 1

    I realize this is a small point, but there is no way that you posted that the WTC & Pentagon was attacked as the headline at 9:12 Eastern a year ago. The Pentagon wasn't hit until a little after 9:30 (as I and everyone else in DC would tell you). I know that you updated the story and changed the headline when it occured, but clearly at 9:12 last year folks in DC were still in shock from the acts in NY and very few of us realized that we'd be evacuating our city and streaming over our bridges on foot like our friends in NY.

    Mark

  43. Re:I'm sorry by datarat · · Score: 1

    While you're publicly tired of hearing about it, what would you have us do? Forget it?

    We need to remember what happenned and why. If we just go back to our day to day lives then it WILL happen again, regardless of your hopes. Just like the Holocaust.

    Those who ignore history are destined to repeat it. It's not just a pithy saying...

    --
    If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  44. September 11th by sql*kitten · · Score: 1, Troll

    Not 2001, but 1973.

    Backed by the US government and the CIA, Augusto Pinochet seizes control of the Chilean military. The previous commander, Rene Scheider, was assassinated by the CIA when he refused to lead a coup against the democratically elected president, Dr. Salvador Allende, who was murdered in his home. This began a 2-decade long reign of terror in which thousands were imprisoned, tortured and killed, and thousands more were exiled.

    Let's hope the next "regime change" is better managed, or Ground Zero and Desert Storm II will only be the start of the West's problems.

    1. Re:September 11th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to point out that if anyone wants to see what this tard looks like please go to his homepage. Really what type of guy calls himself kitten. Go fuck urself buddy! You're one funky looking dude!

    2. Re:September 11th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your insight on foreign policy and world events is truely amazing. You should get yourself a job in Washington.

  45. New National Holiday by carlhirsch · · Score: 0, Troll

    BRING YOUR AIRPLANE TO WORK DAY

    (Yeah, I know it's crass and I just blew karms but I'm fed up with seeing so much media and commercial appropriation of these events with faux-maudlin opportunism. Same goes for the USian government using it as an excuse for a totalitarian power grab.)

    --
    . We've got computers, we're tapping phone lines, you know that ain't allowed - Talking Heads, "Life During Wartime"
    1. Re:New National Holiday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just be sure to park it in the UNDERGROUND parking lot and not the rooftop one. Badoom, cha!n

  46. Classy move... by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    .. disabling the banners.

    God Bless America

  47. I'm not holding a grudge... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    I'm just aware that there are 700 million people out there who are seething with jealous rage and want me, personally, dead. I'm going to act appropriately.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:I'm not holding a grudge... by evanism · · Score: 1

      After reading this posting for an hour I am absolutly struck with both the intensity and complete lack of thought.

      Has CNN spent more than 2 minutes over the last year exploring WHY this has occured?, or do all US citizens honestly feel this was some undeserved attack?.

      I'm not anti-US, but I find it absolutly amazing that through all of this there has been no sign of inward reflection.

      Why is the American response one of violence?, and yet feel that violence inflicted upon the US is unacceptable? Rather than sit back and say "Gee wiz, we really stuffed up, lets be nice for a change", you pull out the guns and bombs and make a new lake.

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
  48. Why did they do it? by fantomas · · Score: 2

    Why did these people carry out this act?


    We need to create a world where people don't believe the way to move forward is through acts of terror or oppression.

    My thoughts are with those who have died through terror or oppression over the centuries. We must find a better way forward.

    1. Re:Why did they do it? by ppluta · · Score: 1

      To give US the taste of humanitarian bombings US uses to play all around the world. At least I suppose something like this. After all, it's not a secret any more that the attack on Afghanistan was almost ready before the attack on WTC, to give one example.

    2. Re:Why did they do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They did it because...
      • The US provides military hardware to Israel in its 50 year crusade to ethnically cleanse the "holy land" of Muslims and make that area a Jewish state with Jerusalem as it's capital. (This is called Zionism)
      • The US has troops on Saudi soil, land that is holy to Muslims.
      • Because we are so much more powerful militarily they can't attack us head-on.
      What the terrorists did was evil. I'm not attempting to excuse their actions. But in their minds they have reasons for what they did. And you asked the question WHY they would do this.

      Here are reasons we are TOLD that they did these things that aren't true.

      • They did it because we're the "brightest shining beacon of freedom" (W's comments on 9/12)
      • They did it because we are the 'haves' and they are the 'have nots'
      This is misinformation told by people who either are trying to gain support for the war effort (in W's case) or people who don't understand the real issues.

      It's important for Americans to understand what this is really about. If you want to support the war on terror you must first understand the sources of the conflict. Not just wave flags and talk about how great America is.

      If we believe that Israeli control of Jerusalem is worth all of this then we should continue to give them 4 BILLION dollars a year in military aid. If we think that what the Israelis are doing over there is wrong and a big source of the problem then we should stop giving them weapons and demand that they stop their "settlements" (which is a nice way of saying "occupation and ethnic cleansing".)

      But guess what lobby is a major contributor to both the Republican and Democratic parties? The pro-Israeli lobby. Big Surprise. FOLLOW THE MONEY

    3. Re:Why did they do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why did these people carry out this act ?

      Indeed - why ? And why did they choose the US
      as their prime object ?

      We've read countless reports about this now,
      and a recurring theme is that muslims "should
      protect their faith" as brothers are attacked.

      Well, that's all understandable, of course - but
      why haven't we seen some heavy involvement in
      Bosnia and Kosovo then ?

      I seem to recall that in Srebrenica 7,000 muslim
      men were killed 7 years ago - I still have to
      see the retaliation for that ...

      I'm afraid the US is a target for a very different
      set of reasons: It's the only way to appear
      on TV ...

      Toon Moene.

  49. time to stop killing by rmolehusband · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We're one year on from the indefensible murder of several thousand civilians in New York. No right minded person can have anything but condemnation for that act of pure evil.

    We should remember however, that the pain and sense of loss from the destruction of an innocent life is the same all over the world and for those of all religions.

    The lasting legacy of the WTC attack should not be war nor more death and suffering.

    --
    Reginald Molehusband. Edinburgh, Scotland
    1. Re:time to stop killing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok so just let the terrorist continue to kill the innocent?

  50. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by xtheunknown · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole point of the matter is that no one deserves death, even those who take up arms against you.

    You may not want to mourn the deaths of those who make war, but you should mourn there decision to make war in the first place.

    It is the idea that people deserve death for there actions, no matter what those actions are, that has gotten us into this whole mess.

    Honor those who fell on 9/11/2001 by striving for peace and harmony. Don't wish death even on your enemies. Pity them for their mis-guided rage, but don't wish death on them.

    Whether you are christian, muslim, jew or otherwise, the common thread is that man does not determine who lives and dies, god does. Think about that.

    --

    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
  51. How we remember, and how we don't by Aero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that the most troubling thing coming into the first anniversary of the attack is some of the stuff purportedly being done in the names of those who died, and (just as importantly) what isn't being done.

    All the legislation passed supposedly to further the cause of the "war on terror", with the amount of true freedom that was taken away with it (or has the potential to be taken away)...the sheer audacity of our leaders sometimes reminds me of kids loose in a candy store (my best friend compares it to Lord of the Flies)...

    How soon we all went back to our divisive bickering over our differences, be the difference ethnicity or religion or income level...

    The outcry over attempts to educate our younger generation about the Muslim world...while I agree that such teachings should not be mandated without equal consideration being given to all sides (so, for example, a required reading assignment of a history of Muslim culture should be accompanied by texts on Christian-Muslim, Jewish-Muslim, and Christian-Jewish relations through history), the mere idea that this is pushing some sort of agenda is a telling indicator that many of us still don't have a clue...

    I will be respectful, I will honor the dead, but I won't do anything stupidly symbolic.

    I work for a major telecom company based in Washington. As I'm about to submit this, at this time last year, we were about 15 minutes away from evacuating our headquarters and moving our critical 24/7 operations to our backup facility. My biggest regret was not calling the one I loved most and telling her that I was okay, even if it was just a voice mail message -- she didn't hear from me for hours. For all she knew, I was hopelessly trapped in traffic or spun out in a ditch somewhere in my attempt to flee the District and get to the backup site.

    I sincerely honor the dead. It's too much to ask, but I wish the rest of us would do the same.

    --
    We can believe in you for 3 minutes, but beyond that, even the King of All Cosmos can't be expected to wait.
  52. Not forgetting by wiredog · · Score: 2
    I live near DC. I know people who work at the Pentagon, and a firefighter who spent that night crawling over burnt bodies there while fighting the fire.

    A co-worker had a friend who worked at Cantor-Fitzgerald.

    Another friend knew someone who was killed at the Pentagon.

    Seeing a CAP over my hometown was surreal.

    1. Re:Not forgetting by jafac · · Score: 2

      I have a friend who turned down a cushy DBA job at Cantor Fitzgerald. They wanted him bad too. They offered to put him up IN the WTC, and they offered to ship his collection of exotic cars as well, and find him a warehouse he could keep them in and work on them in. He was offered six figures. His start date would have been September 10th.

      Reason he didn't take the job? He loves San Francisco. Just loves that city.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  53. Re:When I look out the window I see... by headchimp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hmmm...soo true. Sad but true. Reminds me of a story.

    Was getting gas one day and saw a woman in a Chevy Tahoe, fully decked out with all the options, grill guard on the front, step bars on the side and brush guards on the taillamps.

    One sweet ride to go off roading in. I asked the little soccer mom how does that handle off road.

    She looked at me funny and said "Offroad? Now why would I want to take this off road?"

    Turned out she only got that truck because her neighbors bought one too.

  54. Hypocritcal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I will get flamed for this, but here goes. I find it hypocritical when people want to remember the dead of spetember 11, but we forget that we kill 3500 unborn babies everyday! In war we think it is alright if innocent civilians die, and we call it collateral damage! Honestly as a nation are we any less of killers than those terrorists?

    Also in the name of terrorism, some of our freedoms have been taken away! Is there reason to be happy for our foreign policy especially in the middle east? Well no! We are just supporting a form racism there and we have done it all the more since spetembet 11.

    As for those who have experienced death, my heart goes ut to you. Death is never happy.

  55. United We Stand... by jhines0042 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    United We Stand...

    Today more than ever should be a day where we realize that united we stand, divided we fall.

    Not as a nation, not as a religious group, not as a terrorist organization.

    Today we need to stand together as human beings.

    We all live on this planet together and if we can learn to live together in peace, man to man, woman to woman, country to country, religion to religion, then there is nothing that we can't achieve.

    We are one house and a house divided cannot stand.

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    1. Re:United We Stand... by jokerghost · · Score: 1

      Does it piss anyone else off that "united we stand, divided we fall" are the lyrics off of a Pink Floyd album??

      just a thought,
      -jokerghost

    2. Re:United We Stand... by jhines0042 · · Score: 2

      Actually its from "Hey You" by Pink Floyd and the line goes "together we stand, divided we fall"... not United, together.

      But the sentiment is the same and no, it doesn't piss me off. I am a fan of Pink Floyd and their music.

      "United we stand, divided we fall" was used by Abraham Lincoln in reference to the Bible quote in Matthew 12:25. 'And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand'.

      My point is that we should not look at Kingdom or House in the literal sense.... look at our planet as one house. When you realize that we're all on this mud ball together, then you'll know what I mean.

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  56. Post 9/11 - post911.com saved from squatters by securitas · · Score: 2


    Some colleagues rescued the Post 9/11 domain from some squatters who were doing something crass.

    They've set up a site on some free servers (so don't expect top-notch performance) with some discussion boards and plan to continue what's essentially a post-9/11 blog to news, analysis and other resources about how the world has changed for all of us in the last year.

    I guess each of us deal with those events in different ways. Some do it positively, others not so much so. I'm just glad the squatters dont get the last word on this one.

  57. Which scoundrels do you mean? Politicians? by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2

    I do not feel that the US goverment is trying to achieve anything out of this other than the mid-term elections. Quietly and cynically using this to cover up the fact various characters in the current administration have been associated with some very bad practices. None of them have served in the US forces that they want to send to Iraq.

    1. Re:Which scoundrels do you mean? Politicians? by Microsift · · Score: 1

      No benefit to politicians to remid us how unsafe we were while they were in office. This is a day of remembrance, benefitting everyone.

      --
      My other sig is extremely clever...
  58. ted hennessey by gonar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Edward (Ted) R. Hennessy Jr. 1966-2001

    belmont high class of 1984
    Harvard class of 88 (Cum Laude)
    Kellog School of Business 93 (MBA)(Computer Science award)
    Partner and Principal Consultant, Emergence Consulting, Lincoln Ma.
    Ted was a member of the Hasty Pudding and co-wrote "Whiskey
    Business", their show in 1989.
    He was the musical coordinator for the "Special-K Review" at Kellog during his
    time there.

    Wife Melanie (My Sister)
    Children Rachel, 6 and Matthew, almost 4
    Parents Edward and Geraldine (Big Ted and Gerry) Hennessy (Belmont)
    Sisters Sue and Kathy
    Nephews and Nieces Sharon, 10, Megan (my Daughter), 10, Jimmy, 8, Timmy, 4 and
    Patrick, 18 Mos.

    Ted was smart, funny, honest, friendly, bald and allergic to cats.

    Ted played Guitar (and bass and 12 string). he had a small home recording
    studio in his office where he would compose and record original music.

    At family get togethers, he would gather the kids and play "Wild Thing" while
    the kids sang along.

    His and My Sister's favorite movie to watch together was "The Princess Bride"

    He was a Geek. Just last week he setup DSL and 802.11b networking in his house.

    He travelled 3 days a week, and to compensate for being away so much he devoted
    all of his remaining time to his family.

    every friday was date night with my sister.
    every saturday was spent with the kids at a museum, aquarium, zoo or nature
    park.

    My Sister always dreamed of marrying Prince Charming and being a stay-at-home
    mommy.

    until one year ago today, all her dreams had come true.

    --
    The difference between Theory and Practice is greater in Practice than in Theory.
    1. Re:ted hennessey by gonar · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...He was a Geek. Just last week he setup DSL and 802.11b networking in his house....

      should read, Just the last week before he died, not just last week.

      sorry,

      --
      The difference between Theory and Practice is greater in Practice than in Theory.
    2. Re:ted hennessey by Lovejoy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry for your loss. May God bless you and your family.

    3. Re:ted hennessey by Radi-0-head · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why is this rated as a troll? The poster corrected his own post...

      Whoever moderated this needs to be dragged out into the street and... whatever, it's not even worth it at this point...

      Think before you moderate, please.

    4. Re:ted hennessey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry for the idiot who moderated your comment as troll. Best wishes to you and your family.

    5. Re:ted hennessey by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      I do not mean to dishonor anyone, nor to arouse anger or resentment. Still, there is one thing that has been puzzling me.

      I have been hearing a lot about all this sympathy for those lost on September 11, and their families. What I am wondering is if and how it would have been different had the individual died in a car crash, or from a heart attack, or cancer, or in an armed robbery, aside from the obvious point that this was a terrorist attack.

      Basically what I am asking is if there is anything specific about this way to death that makes the mourning process more difficult than non-terrorst related deaths.

      Forgive me for not understanding. Here is where I am coming from. I have not lost anyone in that way, so I can't relate. The only people close to me that died left in such a way that it wasn't so sad, but that's because of the way I see death: the natural end to every life cycle.

      • My grandmother died of cancer. I was happy that she was done suffering.
      • My great grandmother died "naturally" in her eighties. Even she would say that she would die someday. Thankfully there was no pain.
      • My great uncle shot himself. He was suffering through a lot of irreversible health problems that kept getting worse. He made the conscious decision to end his life, and I respect that.

      Thanks in advance for not taking my question as disrespectful or anything less than a request for information. I may have a psychologial flaw that has been preventing me from understanding on my own (and I am serious when I say that). Please, if you can, shed some light on the subject for me.

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    6. Re:ted hennessey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, according to what God did to this guy family, I suppose that it would be better if He stays away for a few years.

    7. Re:ted hennessey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...He was a Geek. Just last week he setup DSL and 802.11b networking in his house....
      > should read, Just the last week before he died, not just last week.

      No, it should read, Just the last week before he died, he set up DSL and 802.11b networking in his house...

      setup is a noun. set up is the verb.

  59. Hmmm... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I seem to remember that we

    -- Intervened in Serbia to prevent another European genocide

    -- Intervened in Somalia to relieve a self-inflicted famine

    -- Intervened in Vietnam to stop the spread of Communism

    -- Intervened in Iraq to stop a local Hitler

    You know what? I'm not too terribly interested in finding forgiveness for myself in hearts that object to these interventions.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Hmmm... by ppluta · · Score: 1

      Yes, sure. America knows best what's good for the others. That's why they bomb anywhere they want, especially where they can put hteir hand on oil, and have no courage to respond for what they do in front of the international court. The proud banner of totalitarism is in the worthy hands.

    2. Re:Hmmm... by _14k4 · · Score: 1

      This is complete and utter idoicy. The media and you people with the black hearts pick up on the propaganda that the other nations we've attacked distribute. Propaganda about how we're so evil that we don't care about killing innocent people. This is coming from the same people that didn't have the balls to attack America properly, instead just flying planes into large buildings.

      I'm not mocking the fact that this happened. Don't get me wrong. I'm still getting lightheaded and faint whenever I think about / read about this.

      But the fact that there are people who can say "America deserved." or even worse "The people in the buildings deserved, corporate slaves". Just sickens me. Nobody deserves to die. Muslim, Christian, Wiccan, Jew, Marklar. Nobody.

      If the people around the world, and especially America at the front lines, would realize that people die in war things might be different. They have to realize that when we bomb cities in Afganistan we're hitting (or trying to) targets with military personell. We do not seek out the largest most populated buildings and blow them up. No matter how America has killed innocents in Afganistan, the fact remains that both sides have done it. If you want the lesser of two evils, America is just that. It's complet cowardice to do what happened this time last year to any country. Anybody.

      Keep in mind, I said "Deserved". America may have left the door wide open with the breeze flying through.. But that's different. Completly. America didn't deserve this. Afganistan didn't / doesn't deserve what we're doing to the cities and military and civilians there. But, that's what happens when you go to war. The Taliban don't care about the civilians in their own country, which is why they shack up in the mountains and in cities as well.

      Deserved last year's attacks? No.

    3. Re:Hmmm... by ppluta · · Score: 1

      Deserved? No. But who sows the wind, gathers the storm, if I translate the Gospel well into English.

    4. Re:Hmmm... by _14k4 · · Score: 1

      Right, we're on the same page. But nobody deserves do die. I can bet your Gospel says that, if not it should. Nobody deserves to fly planes into buildings. Nobody deserves to die because an improperly aimed missle hit a school instead of the building a block away housing the tally-ban. The common element here is death. Nobody deserves it. America did not deserve the attacks. They deserved a sanctioned talk to generate peace between the factions that don't like us. Nobody deserves to die because of what America has done.

      ESPECIALLY the people in the buildings. If anybody in that radical group had any brains they would have realized that killing innocent people is not the way, no matter how many have died at the hands of America, Isreal, Etc. Hell, if they really wanted to strike us, they should have hit our military. But they can't so they resort to petty cheap shots like what happened last year.

      I cannot think of any other country I'd rather live in. Can you? (If you happen to NOT live in America, well.. nevermind. ;))

      Along the same lines as your Gospel quote, I'm remembered of the law of three. If countries don't work on peace without war, the law of three will keep happening and shit will still be flung at the fan.

    5. Re:Hmmm... by _14k4 · · Score: 1

      If America as an entity deserved / left the door open for attacks, why were more innocent people killed? They didn't do anything wrong. Because we've done it to other countries? Well guess what. We're still doing it, this time in rebuttal to what happened last year. It's a never ending cycle, people should just stop bitching about who's right. Because we're all wrong.

    6. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the typical opinion of a European, who leaches off the benefits/success of the country with the greatest amount of freedoms and principles.

      When you once were great and now are no longer, this must be the mentality you adopt.

      As an American living in Europe, I can find little distinction between the cultures, except for that Americans don't look down their noses at Euros, but Euros, masters of hindsight, like to believe they know and would do better.

  60. Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anyone who still believes that the American education system is at all credible, read this and tell me if you still feel the same:

    I believe you don't have to speak with a lisp to pick out a couch for your living room.

    1. Re:Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who still believes that the American education system is at all credible, read this and tell me if you still feel the same

      Nice run-on sentence. Did they teach you that in one of them there forin skools?

    2. Re:Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds fine to me.

  61. Hats off to the U.S.A. by lamz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One year ago today the United States of America, or as we call it here in Canada, "The States," was attacked. The U.S. response was reasoned, intelligent, and graceful. Hats off to you.

    The U.S. is often likened to a schoolyard bully, and nobody likes a bully. But what kind of bully only acts when provoked? What kind of bully sits on an offender just long enough to make them say "Uncle Sam," then picks them up, dusts them off, wipes their noses, and sends them on their way with an admonition to "play nice from now on."

    No shoolyard bully that I know acts that way. That sounds more like a teacher.

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

    1. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shit,

      sorry, but are you talking about the same USA. On the same planet Earth?

      The USA that bombed Iraq, Kambodia, Nicaragua?
      That is destroyng the environment all the time and then bullying others for doing it?
      Making geneticaly modified food and forcing it on Argentina?

      Wake up!

    2. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always saw the bully analogy like this:

      The US is just the captain of the football team, the biggest, strongest, most popular guy in the schoolyard.

      I'm sure slashdotters can relate to how much they hated these people out of jealousy, not because they were cruel or picked on anyone. They'd never take the time to see the reason he was so well respected was because he was a nice guy.

      The U.S. gives more in foreign aid than the rest of the world combined. They still send cheques to France to rebuild post-WW2, for crying out loud. Is it enough? Is anything ever enough?

      It's a 'bad daddy' syndrome. Some countries just hate the US because they didn't buy them a car for their 16th birthday.. There's another response to your post, saying something moronic about 'forcing genetically modified food on Argentina'... Sheesh..

      They try to feed the hungry and get some bullshit back because they 'dont like the menu'.

      I guess people will always hate America and Americans. They can do so because the American way of life completely embraces their right to think, feel, say whatever they want.

      *sigh*

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by fonixmunkee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      coward, all today is about is the lives lost on 9/11. politics are not in the picture right now. that's it, so leave it at that.

    4. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by liposuction · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Right. Because those countries didn't do anything do deserve it?

      The same US that left the Kyoto accord cause it was BS, and didn't pressure anyone to follow suit?

      You think that when someone is starving, they can tell the difference between geneticaly modified food and food that's not? You think that the starving children who go to bed with a full stomach wake up in a sweat because the food they ate was geneticaly modified?

      Time for you to wake up, you coward.

      --
      "Thoughts are more powerful than any weapon, and I don't even let my people own guns." --Joseph Stalin
    5. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you seriously believe that the US response was reasoned, intelligent, and graceful? Let's see: someone does something horrible on US soil (instead of the other way around for once), and they decide to blow up whoever might be associated with anyone who may have had a hand in it. They weren't sure who did it, but thought that it might be some guy named Bin Laden, and the Taliban don't seem to hate him, so let's blow up Afghanistan (and get good press for freeing those people from the oppressive force that the US put in place there). Our citizens must feel safer, so let's take away privacy rights so we can see if anyone's doing anything wrong.

      Yeah, that sounds reasoned, intelligent, and graceful.

      The problem is that the U.S. *IS* the schoolyard bully who attacks even when unprovoked. It acts only out of self interest, trying to get the other kids' lunch money (remember Iraq? Funny how they helped Iraq in its' attacks on Iran and then attacked Iraq when it refused to hand over cheap oil). The funny thing is that it does it under the guise of freedom. What a crock. The politicians are great in the U.S. They can remove other countries' freedom and the freedom of their citizens simultaneously, and still get them to believe that it's to maintain freedom in the world. "Uncle Sam" doesn't just sit on an offender (and "offender" is used loosely here as the US acts as judge, jury, and executioner all in one), it beats them to a pulp 'till they scream "mommy", and sends them away with bloody noses.

      If the U.S. was a teacher, we'd have a pretty messed up world in short order. Hopefully no other nations try to learn from this bully.

    6. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a proud American who is anti-terror. But I think your statement But what kind of bully only acts when provoked?
      isn't quite accurate.

      In the terrorist's minds they attacked us because we have supported the Israelis militarily as they try to conquer and hold the holy land against the muslim infidel. We give the Israelis 4 Billion (yes with a 'B') dollars a year in MILITARY hardware and then cry foul if an Arab country attempts to send arms to the Palestinians.

      Terrorism is bad. But in their minds we've been doing some provoking of our own.

      The source of the conflict needs to be addressed. The Israeli/Palestinian conflict needs to be resolved. As long as this conflict goes on there will be terror against both the Israelis and the US. It would be a help to end the cycle of violence if America would stop shipping weapons to this war zone.

    7. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      I suppose we should just let the Jews get wiped off the earth while we sit idly by? Because that's exactly what would happen if we were to stop supporting them.

      Last I checked, it was the expressed purpose of many groups in the Arab world to destroy Israel and kill the Jews.

      Last I checked, the Israelis had no such plan for Arabs.

    8. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by makoffee · · Score: 0

      Wow, what a load of crap. That's not how it works. What the US does is goes into a country overthows it's government and tells the people that we will only stop bombarding the country if they take on a capitalistic democratic style government. That way US companies can exploit the cost of cheep local labor and exploit the natural resorces of the land. Regardless of what the people in the other country want.

      Sounds to me like "If you don't give me you lunch money, I'll beat you up some more."

      The us govenment looks out for one thing only - Big Biz. Money is in power.

      --
      -makoffee
    9. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. is often likened to a schoolyard bully, and nobody likes a bully. But what kind of bully only acts when provoked? What kind of bully sits on an offender just long enough to make them say "Uncle Sam," then picks them up, dusts them off, wipes their noses, and sends them on their way with an admonition to "play nice from now on."

      Hiroshima. Nagasaki. Certainly proportionate to Pearl Harbour, one would think?

      That sounds more like a teacher.

      Teachers don't go around picking fights with evryone themselves, and providing support to the greediest 10% or so of the schoolchildren in the same way the US does to right-wing totalitarian regimes. Get a grip.

    10. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People always seem to view this as a black and white issue. It's either...

      A. Arm the Israelis and support whatever they do. Screw the Palestinians.

      or...

      B. Let the Arabs drive the Israelis into the sea.

      I believe that there is a middle way where we can use our influence (and part of that could be with-holding military aide) to coerce the Israelis and Palestinians into making peace. I think there is an option "C" but we're not pursuing it strongly enough.

      But I think you are mistaken. There are Israeli groups that would be happy to exterminate all Arabs in Palestine or at least drive them all out. But again, the extremists on both sides shouldn't drive the process.

      Choose option "C"

    11. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and hats off to the USA for opposing the International Criminal Court. Yes, as the biggest state-sponsors of terrorism (in East Timor, Afghanistan, Iraq, Nicaragua, the list goes on and on), we should be applauded for our efficience in backing the worst dictators and bombing and killing millions of innocent people.

      You are a fucking idiot.

    12. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What kind of teacher extorts lunch money from all the kids in the school yard, while exerting small amounts of physical or psychological pressure on all the kids in the school yard, only to beat the crap out of a kid if they dare to try to throw a punch (and god help them if it lands one). What kind of teacher pays out money to another kid in the school yard who grabbed the personal belongings of another kid, and that kid also uses that money (directly or indirectly) to buy brass knuckles so that it can beat on said kid whenever it tries to get up to fight.

      What kind of teacher cuts off the ability of a kid to buy lunch to the point of sever mental weakness and then installs a mind control device that has the kid willingly giving up 40% of his property and income until the kid revolts against the device and gives the teacher a small flick. Then when another kid attacks the previously controlled kid because of his weakened state, what kind of teacher reacts to this situation by selling needed supplies and giving a credit card to the attacking kid while selling brass knuckles to the disoriented kid in an attempt to make the teacher like them.

      Really, this is a terrible analogy, but still no teacher I know acts this way. It sounds more like organized crime to me.

      --
      -no broken link
    13. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. gives more in foreign aid than the rest of the world combined.

      You mean like the aid to Columbia, Israel, & Indonesia? Some of the countries condemned by various human righs groups for using Torture (among other atrocities).

      An interesting side note: We condemn the Cuban Government as being an evil and corrupt dictatorship, however Cuba sends more doctors around the world than any other country. Think about that next time you start spewing BS about how we "help" so many other countries around the world. The only real help we provide is to directly line the pockets of those in power in this country. Wake up.

    14. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 2

      "What the US does is goes into a country overthows it's government and tells the people that we will only stop bombarding the country if they take on a capitalistic democratic style government."

      I like how this post makes it sound like there are CIA agents, State Dept. officials and soldiers going around to the subsitance farmers, shopkeepers, etc. of these countries and saying "You'd better stop being oppressed and impovrished or we'll have to come back here and bust some heads." Apparently some people can't distinguish between the claims of the thugs and warlords who run (I hesitate to say "lead") some of these countries from the desires of the general population. Countries are not individual organisms. And if the people of a country really want to have someone come and steal their property, then I suppose they can elect someone to do that under a democratic gov't just as easily as they could install one as dictator.

    15. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the terrorist's minds they attacked us because we have supported the Israelis militarily as they try to conquer and hold the holy land against the muslim infidel.

      You've simplified it, probably because it's easy to simplify it in that way: "They're just trying to save the poor Palestinian children". Osama's campaign had to do with the fact that the US military was in Saudi Arabia (by the government's permission, it should be noted), and to him this represents a travesty. He seldom mentioned Palestine.

      Having said that, there are two types of people in the world: Creators, and destroyers. You might remember these two types from elementary school when their difference became apparent. Creators saw potential in the world, and a fresh snowfall represented the potential for snowmen, and a puppy represented a friend. Destroyers see the world in a jealous rage, looking at everything as things to destroy to enact their sense of fairness: Destroyers see a field of snowmen that must be kicked down, and a puppy that should be kicked. Destroyers are the sort in the Middle East who see Israel prosper, and attribute it to some unfair Jewish conspiracy, all the while doing absolutely nothing to improve conditions in their backwater. Destroyers see the US having worldwide influence, and rather than improving their own human rights and gaining friends worldwide to assert their own position, they build bombs and send planes flying into buildings. Destroyers are the scourge of the planet, and there seems to be an unfortunately high percentage of them in the middle east.

    16. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We give the Israelis 4 Billion (yes with a 'B') dollars a year in MILITARY hardware


      I usually don't post, but this is taken out of context. The Camp David accords ending a war between Israel and Egypt included U.S. payouts to both sides. So while Israel gets US$4B in aid per year, NOT all "military hardware", Egypt gets slightly more, US$5B in aid per year, IIRC.


      Funny, you never hear Chomsky talking about that.

    17. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by intermodal · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this. you don't screw with a huge superpower nation and expect them to ignore it. Though I'm betting that's what they were hoping when they did it... either way, thank you, lamz

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  62. Re:Puleeze! by laserjet · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    That's true, but many liberals are using security as a camoflauge to reduce out liberties. A selfish and heinous crime indeed.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  63. Re:Puleeze! by dthable · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like our buddy George W. is really looking out for the civil liberties of Americans. About a year ago, I got laid off and remember watching the CNN coverage as the second plane hit the WTC. The first thought that popped into my head was not about the horror of the event or even those who dies but rather a disturbed feeling that this is the start of a long erosion of everyone's rights.

    Today, we have secret courts used to judge people, the FBI/CIA is allowed to perform surveillance on anyone and everyone and the key to the equation...no one is liable or reporting to freedom's biggest driver - us. Before we start bashing a political party, just understand that the old and true parties need to take the blame for the lack of freedom today.

  64. Ummmm... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2

    I'm fairly sure that the President was a fighter pilot.

    The rest of your comment is equally fact-free.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Ummmm... by JeffryG138 · · Score: 1

      W. was a "fighther pilot" in the National Guard... at least until they started doing drug testing. Then he decided not to participate any longer.

    2. Re:Ummmm... by Microsift · · Score: 2

      He was in the National Guard, and he joined to avoid going to Vietnam. You can talk about his military service if you want to, but I think you do a disservice to the people who died in that horrific war.

      --
      My other sig is extremely clever...
    3. Re:Ummmm... by Hansu · · Score: 1

      >I'm fairly sure that the President was a fighter pilot.

      Wasn't that George Bush Sr?
      Oh, I see, you mean the time he was
      in the National Guard. Wasn't GWB kicked out from
      there because he didn't want to go to Vietnam
      to defend the Free World?

      --
      .signature: Command not found
    4. Re:Ummmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush sr. flew in a torpedo bomber in WW2. Bush Jr. was stationed in the "champagne squadron" of the Air National Guard in Texas to avoid the Vietnam war. When Jr. wanted to work on the political campaign of one of his dad's cronies, it was arranged to have Jr. "transfered" to another ANG base near the political campaign. Bush Jr. never showed up for duty, making him Absent Without Leave for over a year.

    5. Re:Ummmm... by r00tarded · · Score: 2

      hey someone had to protect the texas skies from those north vietnamese!

    6. Re:Ummmm... by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2

      Did he ver, ever fight in a war? The National Guard, sorry doesn't count unless he was helping fire fighters.

  65. A dad's view. by raque · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of you may have noticed the satellite photos of the smoke and "other stuff" that streamed south from Ground Zero. I live in Brooklyn and was right under that cloud. There was a fine white-grey powder that fell for about 20 minutes. I'm a stay-at-home Dad. I How can I explain the feeling when my kids asked why it was snowing. They were upset that it wasn't real snow and I wouldn't let them outside to play as I swept up. I just told them that it was dirt that had blown down from Manhattan. My wife works a whole 3 blocks from Ground Zero but was home taking my school-age daughter to her first day a school. I'll go to my grave remembering the feeling that I was sweeping out a crematoria in front of my house.

    1. Re:A dad's view. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Troll
      They were upset that it wasn't real snow and I wouldn't let them outside to play as I swept up. I just told them that it was dirt that had blown down from Manhattan.

      Hey cool, now what your children will remember about 9/11 is that you lied to them.

      What a beautiful day, besides the act of terrorism it's a signpost of the government taking away our freedoms, AND when daddy lied.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:A dad's view. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it was dirt that had blown down from manhattan. You ass.

    3. Re:A dad's view. by raque · · Score: 1

      What a beautiful day, besides the act of terrorism it's a signpost of the government taking away our freedoms, AND when daddy lied.

      Do you have children?

      Do you tell a toddler that there are people out there who want to kill her because she exists?

      Do you tell her that sorry I can't protect you because the airplanes you love to look at are going to be crashed into you?

      As an A.C. pointed out I told her the strict truth.

      And!! I haven't just bitched on /. about our freedoms, I've contacted MY Senators and Reps and made clear what I think they should be doing on this issue.

      As a SAHD (Stay at home dad) I sometimes come to /. to escape the world of children, though there are times like this that I wish there was more awareness here about children. If we're so upset and up in arms about "Freedoms" whose Freedoms, and world for that matter, are we worried about?

    4. Re:A dad's view. by apurtell · · Score: 1

      And I'll go to my grave remembering the comments and experiences of people like you at the front lines but there will be confort in the knowledge that I was able to, through my technical knowledge and contacts, help in the fight against the radical towel-heads.

      --
      - A.
    5. Re:A dad's view. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      What is it? Do you fell better or superior now?

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    6. Re:A dad's view. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      No, I suck too. But I think people should treat their children the way they want them to treat them in their old age. Presumably this includes telling them the truth.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  66. Personal memory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to get married Sept. 15th 2001 to an American Citizen. Her entire family lives and works in NYC -- actually, her brother worked for one of the biggest tenant in the WTC. Thanks to the job I had a few years ago, I was also able to spend a lot of time in NYC, and I like this city a lot.

    My mom called me up on my cell phone to let me know about the attack. As soon as I got home, I turned on the TV and the I could not stop staring at the horrible destruction on the screen. Calling my fiance family was, of course, simply impossible. We received news that everyone was OK by email, the next day.

    My story is not a tragic (or even a special) one -- we got married on the 15th after all, without her family as they were all stuck in NYC -- but I just wanted to write this to let every New Yorker, and especially the families of the NYFD/NYPD/WTC victims know that they are in my prayers and in my thoughts. We were all Americans on Sept. 11th.

  67. Screw World Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    World Peace is a dillusion of the soft hearted. A dream of something that never has been and never will be. Bloodshed is inevitable, just as war with Iraq is inevitable. It's going to happen sooner or later, so we might as well get into it now while we still have the advantage. If Iraq attains nuclear weapons, we'll be trapped in a standoff - an new cold war. We'll have no choice but to fear their sovereignty. We should bomb them now. Turn the entire place into one big glass wasteland. Then we can deal with the likes of Iran and the other terrorist sponsoring scum. Innocent people will die, but innocent people have always been dying. They died in the towers, and in the planes. They die under the power of their cruel middle-eastern Lords, and they die when some bastard suicide bombs a nightclub. Then when we have all those idiots out of the way, we can go about tightening security at home so no more nuts like Timothy McVeigh or John Walker Lindh come up out of our own ranks, those whiny little ingrates. I want our schools moderated closely for people who might be unpatriotic ideas. The same goes for church's, synagogue's, and mosque's. We'll cover all the bases to keep the whiner's in check - I don't care who you worship, just as long as you're not teaching anything that could be construed as un-American. I love democracy and freedom as much as the next guy, but now is not the time to be bothering with the window dressing. This is war! They brought it to us, now let's bring it to them. Damn them all to Hell.

    1. Re:Screw World Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever stop to consider, especially in light of the tragic events that occurred last September, perhaps our nation isn't as invincible as we [the people of it] would like to believe? Meaning, specifically, is it really safe to pursue a war with Iraq when their leader obviously posesses some resources we seem to be concerned about? Iraq (or solely "Sadam" if you subscribe to republican-viewpoint-oriented mediaSpew) doesn't have any real incentive to use nuclear force against anyone important -- that certainly may not be the case if provoked. I THTISUIWSEIJUASADS JFS: UPW( TI )*U"DWDWDWQQD

  68. oh well by devonbowen · · Score: 1

    Personally, I was hoping that Slashdot would be the one place I would have a remote chance of avoiding this. Truth is that I mourn every day. I mourn the loss of Palestinian and Israeli lives. I mourn the regularly scheduled genocides in Angola. I mourn the more than 6000 "unintended" civilian deaths during the bombing of Afganistan. I mourn the millions of people all over the world dying of starvation or filthy water or lack of basic medical attention. And I honestly don't see why the fact that it happened in NYC makes it more important. Maybe someone can enlighten me. These people get their names read on TV all over the world and the others just simply die while people turn a blind eye. Makes me sick, actually. And when another terror attack takes place, I won't really be surprised. But enjoy your TV programs...

    Devon

    1. Re:oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an American, I see that most people are too blinded by the crap that the media spits out at them to really see what goes on outside. You can't blame them, really. They've been trained to be ignorant all their lives.

      I don't feel happy about the people that died, but I am also not happy about what goes on with other people, outside of my country. It doesn't make it any different. People are people. None are more important than another.

      Many people are going to take today's ceremony seriously. I think that it is OK that they mourn, but the truth is, tomorrow things won't have changed. The world will be back to the normal ways of greed, lies, thievery, hate, ignorance, etc. They will be concerned with nothing but their own personal gains and petty interests... And this isn't just America. It is all over the world.

      OSB and co. are brilliant guys with the way that they executed their plan to make their statement. Unfortunately, it meant murder. That is never right. It is also not right that America kills and bombs people all of the time. Once again though, the media doesn't make American citizens aware of this. And still, they are ignorant to what is going on outside.

      Look at it from a worldwide perspective. Outside of America, you are concerned with what goes on in your home. Inside of America, it is the same. Let them mourn for today. They have that right.

    2. Re: oh well by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      Nothing's stopping the relatives of dead Afghani civilians from holding their own rememberance ceremonies (or whatever you want to call them). In fact, I would think that they have done so already.

      However, I have not heard anyone from the United States demanding that the populations of other countries (including our Attackers) hold ceremonies in honor of our dead. It seems that (once again) we are held to a hypocritical double standard. We are morally required to mourn them, yet they don't have to mourn us (in fact, they are permitted to openly celebrate the event!).

      I am NOT advocating that other countries should feel sorry for us.

      Nor am I saying that Sept. 11th is more important than other global tragedies. Far from it. All I am saying is this:

      Everyone is entitled to their own grief.

      If an person wants to spend today in mourning for their lost bretheren (BTW this includes many, many non-Americans), then that is their Right.

    3. Re: oh well by devonbowen · · Score: 1
      It seems that (once again) we are held to a hypocritical double standard. We are morally required to mourn them, yet they don't have to mourn us

      The innocent people in Afganistan that were killed by American weapons? Yes, I believe that every American citizen has the responsibility to realize that they are partially responsible for that and mourn them. Absolutely.

      See, the difference is that the American people are, by far, the most powerful people on the planet. And US foreign policy causes much suffering in the world. I mean, how do you think those factions in Afganistan were built in the first place? By the CIA during the Afgan war with Russia. And the US has no small roll in things like the Israeli conflict or dozens of others around the world.

      So, yes, I think the American people do have more of a responsibilty to be aware of the plight of others. Because of the enormous power of the US and the poor way that power is often wielded. You are not just like everyone else in the world. You have far more power. And with it comes responsibility.

      (in fact, they are permitted to openly celebrate the event!)

      Now that's just not fair. Very, very, very, very few people did not have total shock and sympathy for America. I live in Europe and saw overwhelming support from everywhere. And my Arab friends in the Middle East called me immediately to express their horror and condolences. The world stood by America 100% during this time and this can be easily seen by flipping through the headlines of that period.

      But, interestingly, I can't say that I have seen the same from Americans lately.

      Devon

  69. No Offense by I_redwolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I happened to be in one of the towers on 9/11. I'm sick of hearing it; I think anyone in the towers at the time are sick of hearing about this. We'd like to move on, I'm watching CNN now and I'm just disgusted, this whole thing disgusts me. Nothing but leeches, money grubbers and people trying to take away my rights dwell on 9.11

    I don't want a moment of silence; I'd like silence on the subject for a while; completely.

    1. Re:No Offense by PhxBlue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude, if you're sick of hearing it, turn off CNN.

      And just because you were in one of the towers doesn't mean you're the only one who has any right to grief. A lot of folks didn't make it out of the towers--or the Pentagon, for that matter. A lot of families will never be able to "move on."

      Reflect on the fact that you were lucky a year ago so that you could have your hissyfit today. Then STFU and let people grieve for the folks who weren't so lucky.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    2. Re:No Offense by sporty · · Score: 2

      I hear you. The idea is nice though. Just the presentation is wrong in a few ways.

      I'm a fellow NY'er who was scared and all that day. I'd like to remember what happened. Maybe not so.. intense.. but at least something.

      Don't be angry about what's going on today. Just allow some of us to wallow in our sadness just for a moment, today.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    3. Re:No Offense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BROVO!!!!!! Well said, and all kinds of other praise to the parent of this post.

    4. Re:No Offense by darkov2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can understand your sentiments, although I was a good 10,000 kms away from the towers. Tonight, here in Australia, the media frezy continues. Almost all the channels have live coverage from New York, you can't get away from it. It was a terrible thing, but I really don't want to dwell on all those poor people dying and the grief of their families and friends. Yesterday there was hours and hours of programs on it. They showed pictures of people jumping out of the towers and pictures of them after they hit the ground. It's all a bit grotesque and undignified.

    5. Re:No Offense by octover · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I agree with you mostly. I understand the need for people to mourn those they lost. You bet if I lost someone I loved, today would be different. The fact is that I had NSA, and top secret government buildings all around me. One of the people I was with was afraid something would happen nearby, I knew that they were either the best targets to hit, or the worst cause anit-air wouldn't let it happen. Of course since they had already lost the element of suprise I knew I was safe. Which is exactly what most Americans were safe.

      9/11 has nothing on Pearl Harbor, the way I see it most of the country isn't going to be affected much by the war on terrorism. The show of pride in America seems to be a shallow gesture. Nobody is banding together, or making sacrafices for their country they weren't before, except of course the armed forces involved. Lots of people have pride in this country and being a citizen I am one of them, I just didn't rush out to show it. I would rather see Americans love their neighbors than flags everywhere.

    6. Re:No Offense by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      Everyone deals with grief in their own way.

      Don't deny me mine.

      If you want to move on, don't watch CNN right now. I'm sorry, but you're going to have to do your best to ignore our sorrow.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    7. Re:No Offense by kevlar · · Score: 1


      In all honesty, I felt the same way until today. I'm sick of turning on the TV and watching those f'ing towers drop. It fills me with anxiety and panic like the day it happenned. It took me months to sleep soundly again. Unfortunately not everyone was impacted like us in the NYC area. It might be overkill now, but I want everyone who wasn't here to know precisely what it was like and how it felt. The govt says we are at war but what exactly has been done? We obliterated sections of Afghanistan because of Al Qaeda and as a result we get criticism from everyone in the world. We're planning on attacking Iraq, a known sponsor of terrorism who explicitly attempted to blow up the WTC and the Holland and Lincoln tunnels. We get criticised for that. We give billions in aid to countries like Saudi Arabia and Kuwait and everyone in Europe yet everyone still HATES America and everything we stand for. The world is staged right now precisely the way Europe was prior to World War I and World War II. The difference is that apparently this time around England and the US are willing to react to the hostility. I want every French commie and every liberal vegan to understand that by sitting on your ass now and "giving peace a chance" may one day have you jumping out of a building to kill yourself because you can't bear to be burned to death like the countless desperate people in Manhatten on that day. Prior to 9/11 we were all willing to be tollerant and we still should be, however tollerance should not protect beligerance.

    8. Re:No Offense by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 2

      Dude, if you're sick of hearing it, turn off CNN.

      More like turn off the TV AND radio. Or pay for cable access and find a movie/comedy channel.

      And just because you were in one of the towers doesn't mean you're the only one who has any right to grief. A lot of folks didn't make it out of the towers--or the Pentagon, for that matter. A lot of families will never be able to "move on."

      He didn't say ONLY people in the tower had the right to grieve. And I don't think the problem is with the memorial ceremonies all over media today. The problem is that for the past year, I don't think there has been one f*cking day that there has NOT been a 9/11 story in the news. But I live in NYC, perhaps you people outside of the northeast were luckier.

      We all knew there was going to be 9/11 memorials on this day. But why the f*ck did CBS and other major networks feel they needed to present 9/11 "specials" SIX months after the attack? Did they reveal to us anything new about the tragedy? No, but apparently there are enough f*cking ghouls in this country that find 9/11 some form of entertainment. You see, this is the problem. This is why so many Americans are sick of all this media coverage of 9/11.

      Reflect on the fact that you were lucky a year ago so that you could have your hissyfit today. Then STFU and let people grieve for the folks who weren't so lucky.

      I'm sure he did for a month after the attack. And then he moved on with his life, ghoul. Loved ones die every day. Are we expected to spend EVERY day of our lives mourning for them? Are parents obligated to remind their children EVERY day that Grandma is dead? Does the fact that these 3,000 people died in the terrorist attack make their lives more special, to deserve such treatment? At a certain point, we tell people to let go of the dead and move on with their lives.

      Did YOU reflect on the fact that he has probably KNEW people that DIED in the tower? That he very badly wants stop feeling that emotional pain, but GHOULS like YOU won't let him? Well STFU, so the dead can rest in peace.

      And lets face it. Its no coincidence that every f*cking day in the media has been spent on 9/11. I knew something was wrong when I saw EVERY major paper plaster 9/11 stories on the front page ON 9/10! GWB & Co. want to keep you angry and grief-stricken, and then tell you the solution is invading Iraq. Then you'll see more Americans in body bags, so we can have cheaper oil and kill Arabs all in the name of the victims of 9/11. But I guess its more important to die well than live well.

      There is a price to pay for living with the dead.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    9. Re:No Offense by Shelled · · Score: 2

      That has to be about the most depressing thing I've read all year, giving an authentic victim of a tragedy, sick of people who weren't there leeching personal gratification from the event, shit for asking them to let it go. You know perfectly well the original post referred to "grievers" who lost no one on September 11 and are using the event as an opportunity to draw attention. "We're victims too! Pity us!" Nauseating.

    10. Re:No Offense by I_redwolf · · Score: 2

      I'm done grieving; I'm living right now. A LOT OF FOLKS DIDN'T make it out yes. I'm very very well aware of that fact. Trust me, very well aware. A lot of families HAVE moved on, it's a process, you MOVE on.

      A year ago today I was lucky; this is no hissyfit it's people like you who give 9.11 a bad name. YOU WONT LET IT HAVE IT'S REVERANCE for crying out loud.

      Until you've had a jet engine in front of your fucking face and a person with a chunk of their head missing laying infront of you; you know nothing about what happened on that day. The images you've seen are nothing compared to the actual event.

      So with all respect sir, maybe you should reread my original post. Everyone has the right to grieve, the people who lost loved ones have grieved. They didn't wait till the anniversary of the day to grieve. It's an ongoing process and the wounds stay fresh with the media constantly ripping them open. As for "Dude, if you're sick of hearing it, turn off CNN". How about "Dude I fucking live in NYC, I'd have to lock myself in a little fucking room; unlike where ever you happen to be from, it's not that easy to get away from it".

      Your post is just fucking digusting and I fear this is how most people think about the event; "STFU and let people grieve for the folks who weren't so lucky". You haven't been doing that all year? If you have then you'd agree this extra coverage isn't necessary, a memorial, a moment of silence is needed; reverance. Pay your respects and continue to live. MORE lives were lost in Vietnam and Americans spit on the soldiers when they came back. Where was your grieving then? Where was the grieving for Pearl Harbor? Where was the grieving for the Gulf War deceased? Where is the grieving for the fallen soldiers during this operation? WHY AREN'T YOU GRIEVING FOR THEM AS MUCH AS 9.11??

      You simply fucking digust me.

    11. Re:No Offense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least one person here is completely, entirely and unreservedly behind you. This victimization industry is beneath contempt.

    12. Re:No Offense by PhxBlue · · Score: 2

      That's your call. But here's the thing: You control your own access to the outside information that disgusts you. You control where you are, what channels you're watching, what radio stations you're listening to, and what websites you're reading. It's easier than you think to continue living with all the extraneous crap turned off--try it sometime. Build a firewall around your mind; stop wasting your time listening to mainstream media.

      That said, I think I did misread your original post. Having seen others who've used their "ordeals" to have books published, I mistook your action as a shout for attention. And for that, I apologize.

      Where was the grieving for Pearl Harbor? Where was the grieving for the Gulf War deceased? Where is the grieving for the fallen soldiers during this operation? WHY AREN'T YOU GRIEVING FOR THEM AS MUCH AS 9.11??

      When I was in my unit's Honor Guard, I buried folks who had survived all the conflicts you mentioned. But actual grief. . . I don't know that I have. It hasn't affected me on a personal level. . . and I guess in that sense, I'm one of the lucky ones. It has affected my friends, though - including one close friend of mine who watched the shit hit the fan from about five blocks away and who lost about a half-dozen of her close friends to the attack.

      All grieving about 11 September aside, though: why weren't we after Osama's arse a lot earlier? Why did it take 3000 deaths at the World Trade Center and 200 deaths at the Pentagon to get the American public's attention? Why wasn't it enough to go after bin Laden when two dozen sailors died on the USS Cole, or when 20 airmen died in the Khobar Towers attack, or when 300 people died in the embassy attacks of 1998?

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  70. And in other news... by azaroth42 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Princess Diana is dead.


    Yes, 9/11 was horrific. But the only reason that it is special to the US is because it was on home soil and that just brings home the point that -anyone- is susceptible to terrorist attacks if their foreign or internal policies make them targets.


    Look to the future, get your warmongering President out of office or it will happen again, be sure of it. Consider the stupid Irish/UK policies and how much grief they have brought.


    Goodbye Karma!


    -- Azaroth

  71. PBS is not ad-free by Green+Light · · Score: 1

    I see "sponsorship messages" on there all day long...

    --
    "Send an Instant Karma to me" - Yes
  72. Best media coverage by chrysrobyn · · Score: 5, Informative

    For your best media coverage in the US, please turn to listener supported NPR. Here in Austin, TX, I have the impression that Clearchannel is taking a day to build a brand name. NPR is doing what they always do, trying to represent as best as they can the events that happen.

    Save bandwidth. Listen to the radio. Or, if you're at work and can't get radio reception (like me), their live program stream is available in Quicktime, Real, or Windows Media. Politics aside, most people's computers can handle one of those programs.

    Their online coverage is available here, and their program schedule is here. Please note that all times are in Eastern time.

    1. Re:Best media coverage by matzim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or, even better, find your (or somebody else's!) local NPR station and see if they stream too so that we don't /. NPR's website... Use the "mirrors" people...

    2. Re:Best media coverage by ahaning · · Score: 1

      Perhaps better would be to listen to listener-supported WBAI which is also the home of 2600's Off The Hook.

      WBAI is located in NYC, so they're probably pretty familiar with whatever's going on.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  73. Won't happen by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 1

    The families and friends of those who died won't be allowed to mourn in peace when there's money to be made of it, primarily the one-ups-manship going on with the TV stations who are using this as an attempt to boost their regular viewing times, thus earn more money from advertising because "We have 50% market share on 9/11".

    America makes me sick sometimes.

  74. Re:Puleeze! by NumberSyx · · Score: 2

    Those freedoms are being threatened by terrorist and domestic liberalism. Get your facts straight!

    Really? When did we elect Bin Laden as President ? I didn't think he signed the US Patriot Act into Law, I thought GW Bush did. Terrorists can't take away our freedom, short of a full scale invasion, only our government can. As I recall, Bush is a conservative, if he is bent on protecting our freedom, why did he sign the US Patroit Act (which guts the constitution) ? Why is his administration holding American citizens without charging them with anything, without access to a lawyer, without any trial, let alone a speedy trial with a jury of peers ? I suspect you need to rethink that statement.

    --

    "Our products just aren't engineered for security,"
    -Brian Valentine,VP in charge of MS Windows Development

  75. What were you doing exactly at that moment? by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    Let's start a thread to discuss what exactly we were all doing at that very moment.

    For me I was playing Counter Strike (at 6AM PST). I was having a hell of a good time using the scout. Then out of nowhere someone types something like "damn I feel weird playing terrorist seeing that the WTC has just been hit by terrorists."

    Obviously I didn't believe him, so he said "turn on your TV". I did and damn it was true. That whole day I didn't sleep. My eyes were glued to the TV.

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
    1. Re:What were you doing exactly at that moment? by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

      I had just woken up to a beautiful day on Long Island. As usual, I walked to my computer and instantly the IM's started pouring in... "Turn on the TV...", etc... I turned it on after the first plane hit. At first, I thought it was small craft that lost control ... Then at 9:05 the second hit, then the pentagon.. thats when I really got scared. I kept on thinking that I was watching a movie. Will Smith was going to save the world from those horrible aliens that blew up the White House. But this was no movie... I cried for hours, answering phone calls asking if we were alright. All I could say was "But its so beautiful out, the sun is shining so bright, the sky is the most blue I have ever seen... " I just couldn't believe that Hell looked like this.

      Nightfall came and thankfully, my parents and loved ones were alright, but I knew that other's weren't as lucky. Me and my two friends decided that we needed to just leave the house, to change our moods ( but that was impossible). Our first stop was 7-11, where we had a good relationship with the Indian owners. They were so upset. People were harassing them all day ... blaming them for what had happened. I felt so bad for them and also for the countless other peaceful foreigners who's name and dignity was destroyed by the unglorious and hellish acts of Sept. 11, 2001. The night continued with an eerie silence admist a cool September night, where summer was exiting and making its way to fall. We all knew that our lives had changed and we had two choices... either to be afraid or to be brave! We have chose to show the world our courage and strength and I pray that through peace and understanding of differences, we can all, as humans, pull together and make this world a better place. Violence and aggression are not the answer to this problem.

      In memory of all the families and victims of September 11, 2001.

      --
      100% Insightful
  76. What as been done to prevent another attack? by arestivo · · Score: 1

    One year after 9/11 I think not everything as been done to prevent terrorists from repeating this attack.

    Even yesterday I saw a news piece where 2 journalists easily entered several airplanes carrying cutters and knifes. They did in several big european airports. One was even carrying the cutter in his back pocket partially uncovered.

    From my point of view the best way of preventing this kind of attacks would be to disable any way of entering the cockpit from the passenger area (even knowing this could present dangers).

  77. UltraC00l by AftanGustur · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    i guess that a moment of silence is best...
    ...
    ...
    for the future iraq victims

    This is the coolest thing I'we ever seen. "We're going to attack your country to control your oil exports, some of you will get killed in the process, so we'l have a moment of silence rigth now.".

    Poor Iraqi people,. hihi .. Don't mess With Uncle Sam !

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    1. Re:UltraC00l by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I guess, a single uneducated, ignorant, lamer one like you can produce 10 terrorists.

  78. Moment of silence from rhetoric by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >for the future iraq victims >for everyone that has ever died through the >hands of injustice, opression, agression and >that old capitalist tool: imperialism.

    Darnit, why does everyone on Slashdot feel like they always have to pile on the political rhetoric thick and high no matter what the occasion. Can't we just take one day to drop the Right vs. Left crap and mourn for the dead?

    I'm ashamed at this site sometimes, especially looking back at many of the high scoring posts from 9/11 that basically said we got what we deserved. Those women and men, mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, just trying to mind their own business and go to work did not deserve to die a fiery death that day. Nor do they deserve to have their rememberance used as a launching point for cheap political attacks.

    Brian Ellenberger
    1. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by _14k4 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I agree with you completly. People die. People have died at the hands of Every country in existance today. Nobody can keep pointing fingers, nobody should. Especially today.

    2. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by hummer357 · · Score: 1

      you're right,

      but without pointing fingers, don't you think that this sh*t should come to an end soon?

      before things get really out of hand?

    3. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2

      the post you were responding to was mourning the dead. and while you're mourning 9/11/2001 in your non-rhetoric way, you might spare a thought for the people in chile on 9/11/1973.

      --
      US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    4. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nor do they deserve to have their rememberance used as a launching point for cheap political attacks.

      that is certainly true. But try telling it to GW Bush who is using their deaths to launch his own military attack against Iraq.

      If I had died in that attack on the WTC I would hope that someone would speak up against my death being used as an excuse to inflict further pain on Iraqi families.

    5. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by _14k4 · · Score: 1

      Things have been out of hand since caveman A decided he'd sleep in Caveman B's .. umm .. cave. It's Human nature I suppose. Well, maybe Human nature when the Humans have an inflated sense of power. That's all countries. The Earth is the sandbox of the children that decide what / who is right for all.

    6. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by reachinmark · · Score: 1
      Those women and men, mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, just trying to mind their own business and go to work did not deserve to die a fiery death that day.

      Come off it. We sit on our fat backsides every day of our life, eating whatever we feel like, doing whatever we feel like, never sparing a thought for the other 90% of the worlds population. Do we stop to consider what our government is doing elsewhere in the world? Not really. As long as America is defending democracy and everyones right to do what they want, who cares if we aren't going to let non americans be communists or have different opinions to us? Who cares if we launch a war against a country just because we think they might want to attack us sometime in the future (ignoring the fact that the really don't have anywhere near the same military budget)?

      These people died because the American government maintains foreign policies that are outrageous, while they all sat on their backsides getting rich and selfishly enjoying the benefits of the american way of life. I'm getting sick and tired of "mourn the dead".. what about "perhaps we really aren't the nice guys after all"?

      And watch me get modded down just because i'm not conforming.

    7. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by shren · · Score: 2

      This is what I always think of when someone trys to bring politics into it:

      A timeless piece from adequacy.org

      I think that's the right piece... Adequacy is blocked at work these days.

      --
      Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
    8. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by why-is-it · · Score: 2
      Can't we just take one day to drop the Right vs. Left crap and mourn for the dead?

      I am not intending this as a flame, or an insult, or a dis-respectful comment. Others may interpret it otherwise however. As a non-USian, the question I have is: why are the innocent people who were killed in the terrorist attacks of 9/11 any more deserving (or less) of remembrance than the innocent people who have died as the result of other acts of terror - apart from the fact that it hits a lot closer to home?

      After WWII, the world was shocked and outraged by the Holocaust, and we said "Never again". I guess we forgot about that vow when:

      The Stalinist purges happened in the USSR
      The Cultural Revolution happened in China
      The genocide in Cambodia happened
      The genocide in Rawanda happened
      Three genocides in the former Yugoslavia happened
      (to name but a few examples of the depths that humanity can descend to)

      Some people have even suggested that the Allies' firebombing of Dresden and the atomic attacks against Japan should be considered terrorist attacks since the military deliberately targetted Civilians.

      Why is this date, this anniversary so significant? I do not wish to minimize the hurt or anguish it caused anyone, but given the scale and severity of other incidents, 9/11 is not the worst act one group of humans have committed against another group of humans.

      It would truly be a significant moment if it were the last such tragedy, but given the course of human history, that is unlikely. It was only 50-odd years ago when we said "Never again", and "Lest we forget".

      Nor do they deserve to have their rememberance used as a launching point for cheap political attacks.

      I am not sure if you are referring to the comments here on /. or tomorrow's speech by GWB in which he will officially begin the countdown to the attack against Iraq

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    9. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And watch me get modded down just because i'm not conforming.


      You fucking idiot, you are conforming. With every other maladjusted teenager on here. Have you read the posts in this thread? Don't worry about getting modded down for non-conformity, the big bad evil jocks aren't hanging around here.
    10. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's aways the cause and effect.

      The death of so many innocent was the (effect), the cause being an attack from a organization fill with hatred for the Americans.

      The source of that hatred (effect), was due to American's endless political, economical and social interferrence with other country (cause).

      No one really deserves to die, but America has always broadcast to the world how she is such a great democracy with people electing the government, how people are the backbone of USA. So the source of America's agenda in other countries can and should trace back to the people.

      So it might be argued that little timmy or joe bag 'o donuts are fair game in this wacky world, by simple association.

      No one deserves to die, looking at the jumpers (I worked at the building across the street) makes you realize how quick life can be extingished. It makes you wonder who's right. But the answer is, there isn't a "right" on either side of the arguement. Americans are neither innocent nor guilty (for lack of better word) for the happenings of 9/11.

      Isn't that the marvel of democracy? You are responsible, yet you can boldly claim (truthfully) that you didn't really make a difference and hence you aren't culpable for subsequent chain of events?

    11. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by duck_prime · · Score: 1
      I am not intending this as a flame, or an insult, or a dis-respectful comment. Others may interpret it otherwise however. As a non-USian, the question I have is: why are the innocent people who were killed in the terrorist attacks of 9/11 any more deserving (or less) of remembrance than the innocent people who have died as the result of other acts of terror - apart from the fact that it hits a lot closer to home?
      Why don't you complain about Norway, or China, or Uzbekistan not caring about genocide in Yugoslavia/Rwanda? Why is America expected to equally mourn every slain person in the world, while other countries are allowed to prefer their own dead?

      Non-Americans, especially Europeans, often complain when America fails to live up to the non-Americans' internationalist ideals, which the non-Americans don't live up to either.

      No disrepect, guys, but ... What's up with that?
    12. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by Kynde · · Score: 2

      I'm ashamed at this site sometimes, especially looking back at many of the high scoring posts from 9/11 that basically said we got what we deserved. Those women and men, mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, just trying to mind their own business and go to work did not deserve to die a fiery death that day. Nor do they deserve to have their rememberance used as a launching point for cheap political attacks.

      I do feel sorry for the dead, but I'm even sorrier for the ones that lived and simply decided to REVENGE.

      Albert Einstein put it well : "It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder." I wonder what he would've said about retaliation.

      It goes both ways, you know. Don't come here telling me to mourn. I'm currently mourning for Iraqians about to die...

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    13. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by why-is-it · · Score: 2

      Why don't you complain about Norway, or China, or Uzbekistan not caring about genocide in Yugoslavia/Rwanda? Why is America expected to equally mourn every slain person in the world, while other countries are allowed to prefer their own dead?

      Perhaps it is because I have overcome tribalism and petty nationalism. I read about the deaths of innocents, and it does not matter what their nationality was. These are innocent people who have died through no fault or cause of their own. That is what should be mourned.

      When looked at from that perspective, it is trivial and inconsequential what passport they carried.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    14. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Darnit, why does everyone on Slashdot feel like they always have to pile on the political rhetoric thick and high no matter what the
      > occasion. Can't we just take one day to drop the Right vs. Left crap and mourn for the dead

      Dagnabit, why does everyone on ./ have the need to give some knee-jerk reaction to a well thought out comment. Oh wait, not every one does....

      > to have their rememberance used as a launching point for
      > cheap political attacks.

      But, they are, and not here either. And that is
      quite likely the point of the original post.

    15. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by duck_prime · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why is America expected to equally mourn every slain person in the world, while other countries are allowed to prefer their own dead?

      Perhaps it is because I have overcome tribalism and petty nationalism. I read about the deaths of innocents, and it does not matter what their nationality was. These are innocent people who have died through no fault or cause of their own.
      Surely it is admirable to mourn innocent dead of whatever region, but that's not exactly what I'm trying to get at. There seems to be something significant about how it is the US that takes heat for not having (say) a Rwandan memorial. Nobody criticizes Canada or Mexico for not mourning Yugoslavian dead.

      It is almost as if there were an unspoken set of ideals that the US -- and nobody else -- is expected to live up to. The US -- and nobody else -- is supposed to be above nationalism. When France honors her dead, nobody pops up saying "but what about the Kurds!".

      I'm not saying there's any weird conspiracy out there, but there may be some unexamined attitudes.
    16. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by Kwil · · Score: 1

      When France honors her dead, nobody pops up saying "but what about the Kurds!".

      True. But then again, France doesn't make her mourning an international event as the U.S. seems so keen to do. France doesn't make statements about "The world changed that day," or "You're either with us, or against us," or start projecting the French Military across the oceans and demanding concessions from neighboring country's security forces.

      I think nobody would question the right of the U.S. to mourn. We question the right of the U.S. to insist everybody else do so as well.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    17. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by evilviper · · Score: 2

      You know what, they don't deserve to be the subject of your rant either.

      You know what I have to say? It's a load of crap brought on by a news media frenzy. We hear how horrible this is, and how unfortunate the next of kin are... but about 6,500 people die in the USA every day.

      I say, why are these 3,000 people being remembered as if they were war heros? Why are we so happy to donate to them, as if they aren't getting enough money already? I forget the name of the political cartoonist who started the big controversy, but he was absolutely right. You are all victims, but of the news media, not some foreign terrorists.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by duck_prime · · Score: 1
      True. But then again, France doesn't make her mourning an international event as the U.S. seems so keen to do. France doesn't make statements about "The world changed that day," or "You're either with us, or against us," or start projecting the French Military across the oceans and demanding concessions from neighboring country's security forces.
      Tell that to Algeria.

      I think nobody would question the right of the U.S. to mourn. We question the right of the U.S. to insist everybody else do so as well.
      I don't think the US "insists" that everyone else mourn our dead. That the world does is indicative that the US is seen as a moral beacon (yes, yes, through a glass, darkly sometimes) ... that is what I was commenting on before, that when the U.S. does react in a nationalistic or "tribal" manner, it draws larger gasps of horror (we are shocked. Shocked!) than when country X does it.

      Another factor I believe you have not considered in its fullness (I'm trying to say politely that I think you are wrong. Wrong!) is that the US is going about its own business, but that the whole world watches CNN. This is not American pushiness; you have to *pay* to get CNN -- that is, you have to ask for it.

      One last thing... The article I referenced above does mention that even the French unbent so far as to hold a memorial. My chapeau is off to them.
    19. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Albert Einstein put it well : "It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder." I wonder what he would've said about retaliation.


      Funny, most combat veterans would agree. War is murder. That's the whole fucking point.

    20. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by nathanm · · Score: 2
      But then again, France doesn't make her mourning an international event as the U.S. seems so keen to do.
      The US didn't make its mourning an international event, the international media did.
  79. my suggestion for today by techstar25 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After 9/11 last year I heard a lot of families all saying the same thing. They all wanted just one more day with their deceased family members so they can let them know how much they were loved. So, I came to a decision. I'm not going to be glued to the television to see any memorial services. In fact, I decided that today I will not turn on the television or radio at all. I will not be attending any local memorial services either. In what will become a family tradition, I am having my whole family over tonight, because I have the time now, the time that so many families would just love to have back. I am going to spend the day appreciating and thanking God for what I have, rather than lamenting over what "we" have lost. If you have kids, turn off the tv and spend some quality time with them (seeing planes flying into buildings isn't really helping them anyway).I think we all should take this day to get in touch with our loved ones and let them know how we feel right now, because, if nothing else, 9/11 taught us that we could lose everything we love in a single moment.

    I'm sure lots of people will do different things today as a reaction to what happened, but this is just my opinion. I'm not saying it's for everybody.

    1. Re:my suggestion for today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I am going to spend the day appreciating and thanking God for what I have, rather than lamenting over what "we" have lost.

      God killed those families. Are you going to thank Him that he didn't killed *yours* ?

  80. Why? by Quirk · · Score: 1

    I've spent the most part of my life studying epistemology. Epistemology can be defined as an attempt to frame an answer to questions dealing with how it is we can know. More recently, in the last decade my studies have keyed more on trying to glimpse an insight into the presuppositions that underlie our world view. September 11 seemed to bury whatever pathways to understanding I might have investigated and left me feeling at best, somehow, impertinent and clinging to facile solutions. Perhaps what comes of the horror of events like 9/11 is that we carry on.


    DO NOT GO GENTLE INTO THAT GOOD NIGHT

    Do not go gentle into that good night,
    Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
    Because their words had forked no lightning they
    Do not go gentle into that good night.

    Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
    Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
    And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
    Do not go gentle into that good night.

    Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
    Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    And you, my father, there on the sad height,
    Curse, bless me now with your fierce tears, I pray.

    Do not go gentle into that good night.
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light

    Dylan Thomas



    cheers
    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  81. Re: 'Terrorists can only take my life ...' by Don+Keehotay · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the tagline!

    --
    U.S. Democracy: born 7/4/1776, died 12/12/2000 R.I.P.
  82. Excellent Larry Miller piece(s) on 9/11... by nettdata · · Score: 2

    Larry Miller wrote a great article for the Weekly Standard a while back, and I found it to be a refreshing read.

    He's also written another article dated today to discuss 9/11.

    Enjoy.

    --



    $0.02 (CDN)
  83. Banners Fitting by Bilbo · · Score: 2
    I thought today's banner was fitting. No goofy sentimentalism or attention grabbing. Simple and to the point.

    Thanks OSDN

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
  84. What has changed? Nothing. Here's why... by webwalker · · Score: 0

    Details: I'm white, conservative (relatively), Christian and let me tell you what I'm seeing:

    Our character is not substantially altered, as NPR commentator Daniel Shore put it.

    My take, that I have been formulating for months, is that we are just as greedy, pushy and self-absorbed as we were a year ago. Our level of consumption in the country is gross, and passed the abusive mark years ago. We have continued our unsustainable lifestyle by sucking dry the resources of the world, essentially exporting poverty to other countries so that we can live large.

    Our economy has evolved to become unsustainable. One country can't continually consume the majority of the whole planets resources and not expect a backlash from the rest of the inhabitants.

    Anyone remember Fritz Lang's "Metropolis" (1926)? The spoiled priviledged class living large on the backs of the workers? Sound familiar?

    SO the real question is not "how have we changed" but rather, "what are YOU doing to change?"

    Pax, Americana

    --
    flames > dev/null
  85. OK, so why did it happen? by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Go ahead, tell me.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:OK, so why did it happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the whole idea, YOU look into it.

      step 1: go to bathroom
      step 2: look in mirror
      ...

      however much I empathise with you for the suffering, you guys are still not asking yourselves any questions, as if you don't want to know the reply...

    2. Re:OK, so why did it happen? by jc42 · · Score: 2

      Well, as an American citizen, I really shouldn't, because our "leaders" have told us in no uncertain terms that if we try to blame America, we'll be classified as terrorists. So not only does the corporate media ignore the real explanations, but a serious attempt has been made to intimidate Americans who might be able to explain it all.

      If you want to know, you should check out the many things that have been written by the citizens of the poorer parts of the world. There is no shortage of explanations for why someone would want to do such things. There is a lot of documentation on the behavior of American government and corporations over the past century. It's hardly secret. And it's not restricted to Americans; Europeans share the blame about equally. Terrorism is nothing new. If you don't understand, you just haven't been paying attention.

      One nice thing about the Internet is that it's difficult for the authorities in the relatively open countries to censor news and history. The information is out there; go look for it.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:OK, so why did it happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      however much I empathise with you for the sufferin

      The hell you do.
      I don't care what your views on American world policies are, we did nothing to warrant terrorists slaughtering 3000 innocent civilians.

      What the fuck should our foreign policy be then? Stand around and do nothing? Mind our own business?
      Bullshit! We are the most powerful country on earth, we can't turn our back when we see innocent people suffereing. When people like warlords in Somalia force starvation on their people, then guess what? We're gonna do what we can to help the starving people.
      So we step on peoples toes. So what? If we didn't lift a finger to help we'd be as criminal as the genoicidal maniacs that we fight.

      We we're criticized when we didn't get involved in World War II until we were attacked. But when innocent people were being slaughtered in Eastern Europe in the 90's, we were should have stayed out of it?
      You can't have it both ways.

    4. Re:OK, so why did it happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Understanding the motives of the terrorists does not make one a supporter of terrorism. A good American is one who always questions what our government does to MAKE SURE they stay on the right path. A bad American agrees to everything our elected officials want to do. That's a direct path to an oppressive government.

      But I digress...you asked why it happened.

      The terrorists did this because...

      • The US provides military hardware to Israel in its 50 year crusade to ethnically cleanse the "holy land" of Muslims and make that area a Jewish state with Jerusalem as it's capital. (This is called Zionism)
      • The US has troops on Saudi soil, land that is holy to Muslims.
      • Because we are so much more powerful militarily they can't attack us head-on.
      What the terrorists did was evil. I'm not attempting to excuse their actions. But in their minds they have reasons for what they did. And you asked the question WHY they would do this.

      Here are reasons we are TOLD that they did these things that aren't true.

      • They did it because we're the "brightest shining beacon of freedom" (W's comments on 9/12)
      • They did it because we are the 'haves' and they are the 'have nots'
      This is misinformation told by people who either are trying to gain support for the war effort (in W's case) or people who don't understand the real issues.

      It's important for Americans to understand what this is really about. If you want to support the war on terror you must first understand the sources of the conflict. Not just wave flags and talk about how great America is.

      If we believe that Israeli control of Jerusalem is worth all of this then we should continue to give them 4 BILLION dollars a year in military aid. If we think that what the Israelis are doing over there is wrong and a big source of the problem then we should stop giving them weapons and demand that they stop their "settlements" (which is a nice way of saying "occupation and ethnic cleansing".)

      But guess what lobby is a major contributor to both the Republican and Democratic parties? The pro-Israeli lobby. Big Surprise. FOLLOW THE MONEY

    5. Re:OK, so why did it happen? by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Isn't blaming America kind of like blaming the abused wife for "making" her husband beat her?

      Though I suppose that analogy could go both ways considering the way the US has abused almost every country on the globe... Maybe it would be a better analogy to compare the US to the abusive husband whose wife finally decides to shoot him... Either way, the behaviour of the US does not justify the destruction caused. The reason behind it was, in my opinion, purely religious. No jealousy of freedom or wealth or anything like that, simply the burning hatred of a bunch of decadent, hedonistic, infidels.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    6. Re:OK, so why did it happen? by mgessner · · Score: 1

      I'm in total agreement that we've done nothing to justify the death of the 3,000 civilians. That's terrorism. As for the Pentagon attacks -- those are possibly "justified" in a war as being a military target. And the Capitol Building as well, or even the White House. If they're declaring war, it's the military targets they should be attacking.

      But to kill civilians intentionally is cowardice.

      In fact, and do *NOT* take this the wrong way... I would not have counted an attack on the Capitol as much wrong as I do the attacks on the WTC. You could justify *that* as being an attack on the "evils" of the U.S. Government, which I'm sure MOST people would agree has not (and is not) always acting on behalf of its citizens. (We get the gov't we elect, not the one we want; and too few of us are minding the store!)

      In either case, though, how can you EVER justify the use of using civilian, commercial airlines with 100's of civilians as WEAPONS?? If they'd went out and bought their own airliners and then flown THOSE over in suicide attacks against military targets -- then I'd say they were aiming at starting a real war. Tragic as it would have been, it would have been "military" action against military targets (but very well disguised).

      I'm not naive nor blind enough to know that the U.S. Gov't, in the name of and on behalf of its citizens, hasn't always conducted itself in the best interests of those citizens, and has not always been the best "citizen" of the world in some regards. But let's also not discount the many times in the past that the U.S., either in the form of its federal government or its private citizens, has done more to aid suffering and poverty than most of the self-righteous, sanctimonious and holier-than-thou European nations put together.

      And to the British citizen who's living in France: be GLAD the U.S. was there back in WW II to save both countryies; otherwise you'd ALL be speaking GERMAN all the time.

      --
      "Sometimes the truth is stupid." - Lawrence, creator of Prime Intellect
    7. Re:OK, so why did it happen? by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      * The US provides military hardware to Israel in its 50 year crusade to ethnically cleanse the "holy land" of Muslims and make that area a Jewish state with Jerusalem as it's capital. (This is called Zionism)

      Uhuh. Allegations aside, we keep our treaties. Doubtless we'd be a far better country if we ignored all our treaties we entered into with other contries.

      Why shouldn't the Jews have the city THEY founded thousands of years ago, that was originally their capital, as their capital?

      * The US has troops on Saudi soil, land that is holy to Muslims.

      Yep, and we were invited their by the Saudi government.

      * Because we are so much more powerful militarily they can't attack us head-on.

      That *was* a head-on attack. There was no difference between what they did, and if they had launched a couple cruise missiles at us.

      It's important for Americans to understand what this is really about.

      I'll tell you what it's all about: It's about borders, language, and culture.

      The islamic extremists want to kill us because we do not worship Allah in the way they say is right.

      They want to kill us because of our language.

      They want to kill us because we let our women walk around with their faces, and *OMG* skin exposed.

      They want to kill us simply because we exist in our own way.

      They want to kill us because we uphold our promise to Israel that we made half a century ago.

      This has nothing to do with our generalized foreign policy. They don't want us to change that, they want us to die.

      Do you really think that if we cut off Israel from our aid, that the islamic extremists would simply stop?

      Maybe they would, after all of America converted to islamic extremists.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    8. Re:OK, so why did it happen? by intnsred · · Score: 1
      Allegations aside, we keep our treaties.

      What treaty do we have with Israel? We surely don't have a mutual defense treaty.

      As to the US keeping our treaties, that's just a nationalistic myth. The US gov't breaks treaties when it's in their interest. Sure, we try not to do that often, but as the anti-ballistic missle treaty illustrates, when we want to break a treaty, we will break it.

      I'll tell you what it's all about: It's about borders, language, and culture.

      I agree with that in general. (But definitely not with some of your points.) However, you seem to completely ignore the imperialist aspects of US foreign policy -- the US support of undemocratic governments in the Middle East, our domination of the oil trade and international monetary system, interference in Arab countries, etc.

      Instead of Bush using almost exclusively military tactics, I think this war against terror is more or less a war against Islamic fundamentalism. If that's what it is, then our primary weapons should be social and cultural in nature and not military.

    9. Re:OK, so why did it happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to look up the definition of Imperialism. I believe the last countries who implemented this form of growth were western European.

      I agree that social and cultural means are the best to win the 'war' on terrorism. Of course it is not acceptable to promote ideas such as equality of the sexes and races, separation of church and state, mass education, and all the other means by which those who control the power around the world would lose it.

  86. Re:I'm sorry by SkankhodBeeblebrox · · Score: 1

    I don't think anyone is ever going to forget 9/11/01, regardless of whether there is extensive media coverage or not.

    We don't need the media to help us remember, or deal with the feelings of loss or anger... That isn't what the media does, they exploit what happens in our daily lives, and then continue to do so ad infinium...

    Everyone remember what happened a year ago, but don't dwell on it. 3,000+ civilians losing their lives to an act of terror is no worse than 1 civilian losing their life to an act of terror.

    Acts of terror are as much a way of life for the people in the middle east as "mom and apple pie" is for Americans.. The cilvilans there have to deal with stuff like this happening every day, hundreds lose their lives there every year due to car bombs, suicide bombers, you name it... Why doesn't the world mourn for them??

    The answer: Nobody's afraid of pissing off a small middle eastern country like they are the US of A...

  87. French Revolution by mary_will_grow · · Score: 0

    The whole thing stinks of a class struggle.
    The poor, overworked french proletariat?
    The middle east people.

    The borgeousie?
    The small population of the middle east that make up the economically tyranical regimes which hold the oil hostage.

    Marie antoinette? Who was not an evil woman, but
    was wholly unaware of the economic hell she was putting the french people through? Who used to play "Peasant" on the weekends in a mansion supposedly built up like a peasant's house in order to feel more in touch with france?
    The naive americans who feel like they are doing the right thing, who feel like they are in it to make the world safer, who are in actuality forking over their money, driving their SUVs, to the tyranical oil regimes that are destroying the middle east.

    --
    Why stick up for big business?
  88. Response the wrong focus... by Tyreth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As much as a terrible thing that 9/11 was, I can't help but be much more concerned for those 250 people that die each day because of Iraq sanctions, of the millions starving around the world because we rich people are too unwilling to solve it, because of the abusive and dominative policies we western nations place on other countries, and the many more greater evils that we are responsible for.

    The terrorist attacks on 9/11 seem to have been a response to many of these problems. They targeted pentagon - a symbol of military power, and the world trade center - a symbol of capitalism.

    Revenge seems unjustified to me unless those who were affected can look at themselves first and say "Is there anything that I am guilty of that would make it injust for me to seek revenge?" I think that unless the western nations look at their faults, which are much more grevious than what the terrorists have done, we are even more guilty than they.

    We need to look at ourselves and clean ourselves so that we are without excuse. Only then can we justly say "We did you no wrong, and this is how you repay us?"
    Right now many peoples and countries have the right to complain against western evils, and we are certainly far from being without fault.

    Mourn on this day, but don't look past the facts that the problem will not be solved by war - it will only be increased. Attacking Afghanistan has solved nothing, and attacking Iraq will solve nothing also.
    The solution is with ourselves - recognising and mourning all those evil qualities we all possess, and all those actions we are guilty of. Otherwise how can one murderer say to another "what you did was disgusting and you deserve to die" without saying the same thing to themself?
    It saddens me that 9/11 could have been used as a catalyst to produce lasting change in people's hearts. Instead, we are now on the road to war with Iraq which seems to be against the wishes of almost every nation, with worldwide warnings of disastrous consequences.

    The solution is at home.

    1. Re:Response the wrong focus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish that more people understood this. Thanks for posting it so intelligently.

      There is nothing wrong with mourning, but hate and revenge are not solutions. Killing is not a solution. Two wrongs don't make a right.

    2. Re:Response the wrong focus... by neocon · · Score: 1
      Three problems here:

      First off, no one in Iraq is dying because of sanctions. When billions of dollars are sent to Iraq every year to feed the population, and Saddam Hussein uses the money to build summer palaces and weapons of mass destruction instead of to feed his people, the deaths are his fault. When Saddam is gone, no one will be starving. With Saddam in power, people will starve whether there are sanctions or not, as starvation is one of the main weapons he uses against his political enemies.

      Second off, no one is talking about `revenge' either. To the extent that we are going to war, we are doing it not to avenge the 3,000 Americans who were murdered on September 11, 2001, but to save the lives of the tens or hundreds of thousands of Americans who will die if a nuclear, biological, or chemical attack occurs in the heart of a US city.

      But all of this is tangential to your argument. You seem to think that if we are not perfect, than we have no right to act in our own defense (never mind the defense of those in his own nation whom Mr. Hussein is murdering. This is nonsense, and if we fail to prevent the next attack, the blood of those murdered will be on the hands of those whose petty moralizing stopped us from preventing the attack.

      This is why your statements about `the wishes of other nations' are meaningless (they are also largely untrue -- a number of nations have voiced their support, and we are acting in enforcement of no less than 13 UN resolutions passed over the last decade). The president and the congress of the US are not in office to be liked by European appeasers or third-world dictators. They are in office to defend the American people. And this is why they will not allow European-ness envy or petty appeasement to stand in the way of preventing the next attack.

  89. Sep 11 For Me by CmdrTaco · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I woke up early, planning on getting some work done and having lunch with a friend who was visiting from out of town. Ironically, her husband was stationed in Saudi, so she was home visiting her family. I first got a message on IRC from a friend saying a plane hit. Then I heard on Stern that a 2nd tower hit, and posted on Slashdot.

    I felt like a zombie for the next few days. All of Slashdot's team worked together to update stories and struggle against traffic that spiked to 3 times our usual peaks. Spare boxes were stolen for the cause and brought online. Meanwhile we did our best to make sense of what was happening along with everyone else.

    I'm still very proud of how we handled our tiny share of that day and the aftermath. I know that what we did helped some. And I seriously feel honored that I was able to help.

    I've actually been on edge all week knowing that this story was going to be posted on Slashdot. It forced me to reread much of our original coverage. It forced me to relive those frantic first minutes, and the hours, days, and weeks that followed it.

    I hope this story manages to help some others too. It has already helped me.

    --
    Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
    1. Re:Sep 11 For Me by eduardo · · Score: 1
      Thanks, CmdrTaco. Thanks to you and all of the other slashdotters.

      I was underway on a submarine when the terrorist attacks occurred. When I finally got back on terra firma, I spent a considerable amount of time on slashdot reading the first-hand accounts.

      It all helped me to deal with my feelings on this.

    2. Re:Sep 11 For Me by Orne · · Score: 2
      Here's another thank you to you, and all the other workers that toil behind the scenes to keep our country running.

      ... to the police, fire fighters, and EMTs that kept people calm and out of harms way.
      ... to the admins that kept the information flowing: photos, reports, message boards, etc.
      ... to the phone companies that kept the land-lines from collapsing, which let us contact the ones we love.
      ... to the electric grid dispatchers that served the nation's load, so that everyone else could continue doing their jobs.


      Our jobs are not meant to be noticed, but we appreciate them being there all the same.

    3. Re:Sep 11 For Me by rossz · · Score: 2

      You did a great job that day. While slashdot was a bit slow in loading, it at least loaded. The major news sites such as CNN were completely useless.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    4. Re:Sep 11 For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well...

      I've been a slashdot regular since 1998, but I'm posting AC today.

      I work for some three-letter agencies at a fairly central information gathering facility. Yes, we're here too. I can only describe the mood during the attack as surreal.

      I had an experience many of you probably had - that of being the first to tell a roomful of people that the United States is under attack and both towers of the World Trade Center are now piles of rubble. And as an afterthought (!) the Pentagon. It probably doesn't need to be said that we were, and are, determined to see this thing through.

      I too am honored to be able to contribute to the national effort, and I thank you for your hard work.

    5. Re:Sep 11 For Me by AntiFreeze · · Score: 2

      I just wanted to reitterate what I said a year ago today: CmdrTaco and the rest of you slashdot guys, thanks for the excellent coverage and needed forum.

      It's hard for me right now -- my grandmother passed away on Friday, and we buried her Monday, forcing me to return to New York after I had decided to stay away for the 11th, making yesterday doubly hard -- and I'm at a loss for new words, so I'll simply link to what I wrote on slashdot last September 11th and 12:

      None of the posts are as eloquent as I would like them to be (or as I remembered them being), but they get my thoughts across rather clearly, and in a much more manageable way than I am able to muster at this time.

      Let me conclude by saying that yes, Taco, this story has certainly helped others cope with the events which happened a year and a day ago. It significantly helped me -- and many others -- by providing an immediate forum in which to rant, grieve, and rant some more. Just look at my posts and those like them, you have helped us more than you will ever know.

      --

      ---
      "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller

  90. How have I changed? I hope I haven't. by dmorin · · Score: 2
    This is really going to sound like flamebait, but hear me out. A popular question today is, "How have you changed?" or "How do you think the country has changed?" and I want to be honest in my answer.

    Let's say that I've changed for the bad. I'm more paranoid now, and I look at every Middle Eastern person I see and wonder if I should call the authorities. Is this the kind of person I want to be? Would this really be a change to be proud of? Or, as we've heard said so many times, would this mean that "the terrorists win"? Would I find it funny now to send white powder to my enemies? Or spraypaint graffiti on a mosque? So no, I'd prefer to think that I have not changed for the worse.

    Ok, then, maybe I've changed for the better. Maybe I'm one of these people like I read about in the paper this morning that says stuff like "After 9/11 I decided to not let the small stuff bother me anymore. I wouldn't shove my way off the subway, or flip off the guy that runs the red light when I'm trying to cross the street." My response to this? What in God's name made the tragic death of 3000 people the reason that you suddenly decided to become a nice person? Shouldn't you have ALWAYS been like this? Couldn't I have gotten up any morning of the year and said "I'm going to be a nice person today"?? And perhaps more importantly, does it make you feel better to really *do* it, or just to say it? This morning somebody ran a red light while I was trying to cross the street. I flipped him off. I'm no hypocrite - I never claimed I wouldn't do that, because I never expected it would be a promise I could keep. Meanwhile there really is a column in today's paper from a woman apologizing for "giving a guy a nasty look" on the subway. Well, at least she recognized her own hypocrisy and tried to make amends.

    Maybe you really have changed. Maybe you are a model citizen these days. You said it, you meant it, you're proving it every day. So now you're in a position where you've got the terrorists to thank. Isn't that special. Don't try to debate it -- you've just admitted that it took a terrorist act to smack you upside the head and make you wake up to your influence on the world around you. So sorry that 3000 people died, but at least you got something out of it. How long is it going to last? Are you a good person forever, or has your attention already gone on to other things? What did you promise yourself on 9/12? Have you checked up on that list lately?

    Maybe you were a good person all along. You regularly do charity work, and donate your time and money, and think about your fellow man. Then I expect that 9/11 didn't change you at all. It just gave you an opportunity to feel that your good deeds actually make a difference in the world.

    "September 11 changed me" is not something to be proud of. It should be an admission that you needed a wakeup call, and it took a tragedy of such magnitude to make it happen. The best possible outcome you can hope for? Now that you're awake -- STAY THAT WAY. Ask yourself every day if you're really awake to the world around you and your place (and influence) in it. Because if you're not, then who knows what the next tragedy is going to be to make you *really* wake up.

  91. I remeber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last year sitting in class wondering what was going on. Thanx to slashdot (the only site that wasnt "slashdotted" i was able to know what was happening and links to many different resources that were not affected by all the courious people.

    Thanx for all the great geek news and for keeping us informed in times of tragity

    -Eric

  92. Ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm sorry, but 9/11 is more an excuse for abuse of political power right now as I see. I'm more sad that all those that died have their deaths tied to the crap that the government has done since 9/11.

    How many more will die because we shorted many other departments of the government and threw it all into military? ( Before you make a fool out of yourself, do yourself a favor and actually LOOK at the budget before spazzing out. ) How many will die because we were too busy mourning those that have passed away already instead of helping those who are in need NOW?

    Celebrates and corperations will continue to feed off 9/11 for attention alone until everyone stops being so guilible. And if anything, everyone hates America 10x more today than they did in 9/11. Maybe security is enhanced, but right now we're busy making a lot of enemies in the world.

    Most news sources give you the news you want to hear. I seriously suggest going to a direct news source that doesn't only post the Reuters / AP stories that they think are appropriate.

    Just a reminder - more people die in Africa from a SINGLE disease daily than die in 9/11. Many deadly disease take lives of innocents daily. Do you lend them the same ears? No, their cries go mainly unheard by the powers that be. Sure, we put some cash towards helping them, but its just enough to make politicians look like they care. In reality, we just plain ignore their castastrophy.

    Just go look at the numbers. Sept. 11th was a tragedy, but when it comes to playing with 'the big boys of death', it doesn't even come close. 2,000 some deaths versus tens of millions of death?

    If anything, with 9/11 we've shown the world just how much power we've had all along, and just how ignorant we are when it comes to using this power. This power now seems completely focused on the military, instead of helping others in much worst conditions. Maybe helping countries stop dying from something as trivial as hunger would be a wonderful start. ( But they don't count? Yeah, now look who is brainwashed. )

    All in all, I'd say disease is the real threat to humanity presently. Many people suffer from it, and many people die from it. How about huge government projects researching into new treatments for diseases? Or spreading the current lifesaving treatments we have to those that need them TO LIVE. This isn't just a pipedream, people. We have the means to do it, but not the will.

    Anyways, I'm going to try to not laugh in someones face today when they put on their tragic faces. Yes, it was a tragedy. Get over it. It's over. Move on. Help people who need help now, and stop doing what anyone could do - just mourn.

  93. It has only been one year by gosand · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It has only been a year. It is hard for me to even hear about these events, let alone see the images. I don't need to re-live them. Not yet. Maybe not ever. I am in the Chicago area, so it isn't even like I was as directly affected as those who live and work in NYC. But we were all affected in some way or another.

    I purchased a red/white/blue ribbon from a fireman at a stoplight just a few days after the attack, and it is still on my car antenna, albeit a bit dirtier now. I don't need to wear red white and blue to work today, even though it was "suggested". I don't need some kind of mandated or suggested sign of solidarity.

    I was really surprised at how soon Americans went back to their daily lives. Saddened, really. It wasn't long before I heard my first Bin Laden joke, or was emailed pictures of him with a building going up his butt, or saw a Tshirt with a target on his face. I was amazed, but not really surprised, at how quickly good ol' Americans returned to their stupid, over the top, to the EXTREME! ways. It was nice to see a flag on everyone's car. It was sad to see some cars with 30 flags on them. It was nice to see sentiments of freedom, sad to see such bravado and machismo. I kid you not, someone near where I work painted their house red, white, and blue, with big hand painted letters phrase "Justice will prevail".

    Sometimes I am very proud to be an American, but sadly sometimes I am a little embarassed. Today, I am going to be proud. Proud of the fact that we do enjoy freedoms in this country. That we try to offer it to everyone. Even if it means that you can act like an ass sometimes. That we have clean water to drink, and plenty of food to eat. That I have a beautiful wife of 3 months. Sad that corporations are so greedy and controlling, and that money is such a driving force. Sad that so many people lost their lives because of ignorance and fear. Hope - that we can all get beyond what happened a year ago, and what atrocities happen every single day on this planet. If there is a God, may she bless us all.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  94. Kudos To /. by spudwiser · · Score: 1

    As the events were happening, most of the major news sites were getting knocked down or were being sluggish about things. At my college, I had mentioned to my RA that www.slashdot.org had good coverage and speeds. Word quickly spread and next thing we knew, an email from the president of the college was sent out to all the students and faculty about things to do and web sites to go to, and sure enough, slashdot was listed. Kudos to you guys for keeping up with the coverage and again for having a nice fat pipe to push it all out on! It really helped, and I'm sure my college wasn't the only location where /. became a main source of coverage as cnn.com etc got knocked down by a hundred million people surging onto the net.

    --
    .cig - what you do after winning a good flame war
    1. Re:Kudos To /. by ScooterComputer · · Score: 1
      This was the exact thing I was going to post....it was amazing to me (besides what was happening I am still a geek ;) that seemingly ALL the "major" news sites were HAMMERED that day. You simply couldn't get decent information, and the television coverage--contrary to the horseshit the media is trying to convey today--was terrible. Even NPR was crap. But Slashdot, a loosely-coupled hangout of disparately-located Nerds was able to provde links and information. To me, it made me proud in the middle of something so tragic.

      I actually began gauging coverage of other news sources by what I could find from Slashdot, and was busy debunking the "myths" that others emailing me and IM-ing me had heard from TV and radio. To me it was nearly as tragic to see how the American public had clearly allowed themselves to become spoonfed babies at the newsfeeds of the established media. And boy, looking back on that day, there were some WHOPPERS of f'd up coverage. (NPR continued to state that a plane had crashed into Camp David, even after it was quite apparent that no such thing had happened...does anyone in the media still remember how to use a telephone?)

      Anyhow, like I said, it was how the "beauty" of the internet, something the bulk of the population STILL doesn't "get"--the decentralization, the power of the input of the individual, the ability to quickly/easily support claims--that will most proudly stand in my memory of Sept 11. And Slashdot was a stellar contribution to that.

      --
      Scott
      "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
  95. I remember the words of Kahlil Gibran.. by cOdEgUru · · Score: 4

    Than Almitra spoke, saying, "We would ask now of Death."
    And he said:
    You would know the secret of death.
    But how shall you find it unless you seek it in the heart of life?
    The owl whose night-bound eyes are blind unto the day cannot unveil the mystery of light.
    If you would indeed behold the spirit of death, open your heart wide unto the body of life.
    For life and death are one, even as the river and the sea are one.
    In the depth of your hopes and desires lies your silent knowledge of the beyond;
    And like seeds dreaming beneath the snow your heart dreams of spring.
    Trust the dreams, for in them is hidden the gate to eternity.
    Your fear of death is but the trembling of the shepherd when he stands before the king whose hand is to be laid upon him in honour.
    Is the sheered not joyful beneath his trembling, that he shall wear the mark of the king?
    Yet is he not more mindful of his trembling?
    For what is it to die but to stand naked in the wind and to melt into the sun?
    And what is to cease breathing, but to free the breath from its restless tides, that it may rise and expand and seek God unencumbered?
    Only when you drink form the river of silence shall you indeed sing.
    And when you have reached the mountain top, then you shall begin to climb.
    And when the earth shall claim your limbs, then shall you truly dance.

  96. my photo tribute by acomj · · Score: 3, Interesting
    When I lived in NY I used to take a lot of pictures of the city, many of the towers. I pullws them together a month after the tragedy in a web photo gallery. It didn't feel right to post them to my site, so I didn't. The photos seemed more about the towers rather than the people that perished which made me uncomfortable. As time passed the pictures came to meen less and less about the tragedy and more about the human spirit that allows us to builid amazing things and go on even after a tragedy of this magnitude.

    My photos are here

    also Here is New York has many good photos as well.

    1. Re:my photo tribute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although I don't have a lot of pictures, I also have a website about 9/11, which I made last year.

      Go to http://404pagenotfound.cjb.net and the links are in the first story.

  97. Any new ideas for the Israel vs Palestine problem? by Rayonic · · Score: 2

    I mean, other than atomizing the whole region.
    Not flame-bait, just asking. In a year, did anyone come up with a way of solving that 50+ year old problem?

  98. Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dad noted that today is also the anniversary of the 1976 military coup against the democratically elected government in Chile.

    Here's a link http://www.pir.org/chile.html about the involment of the US.

    And NO this does not mean that last years September 11th wasn't a great tradegy and possibily the worst day I've experienced during my life. I'm also getting sick and tired of some leftist (I consider myself one too, but that's an other matter...) Finns telling us others that we should not mourn for the innocent victims in New York just because we don't mourn for all the victims of all the other mass murders of Ruanda or other places.

  99. Why yes, yes we do... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2

    ...know what's good for others. To prove it, we've been living the good life for quite some time.

    As for oil, we pay for it.

    As for internation courts, well, let me just point out that Libya is now, with French connivance, heading up the U.N Commission on Human Rights.

    Totalitarianism is in the hands that have always held it, and people like you are the silent co-conspirators.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Why yes, yes we do... by ppluta · · Score: 1

      Sure you live a good life. And the bills pay the weaker countries because if they don't, you'd make a little, nice war to prove them they should. Of course it's all theirs fault, they shouldn't choose the government that wants independence. Independence is good for the declarations, not for real life.
      And speaking of the Court - so what? I know that US propaganda points to Libya as one of the sources of the evil, but it's not a reason to hide from justice. A little courage, I repeat. But I know I demand too much, I remember what happened after US pilots have killed in a game some twenty people in Italy, few years ago. Briefly - the mountain cable trolley suddenly appeared in front of their plane and attacked them, at least it was, more-less, official US version. And the killers were taken away so that the Italian courts don't touch them with their dirty hands. So why would I expect that US president stands before the court of law and explains the reason to bomb the independent country?
      And you'll be telling me this is not a totalitarianism?

    2. Re:Why yes, yes we do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the bills pay the weaker countries because if they don't,

      Wrong. We pay for what we get. You might ask yourself why those countries are still "weak", despite having been around (in many cases) for thousands of years before the U.S.even existed. Could it be because our system is better than the religious/tribal/feudal/fascist/communist/kleptocr at/whatever other fucked up system of government they have? Nope. Gotta be our fault.

      And let's just say that your version of the accident in Italy is at variance with the truth.

      You might also ask yourself why the third world countries that have become prosperous are PRECISELY those ones where they've come closest to adopting the American system and why those European countries that have gone into the toilet are PRECISELY those ones that have adopted socialist/communist systems. For example, Italy. You guys have gone from a major world power to what is essentially a third world country. The only reason you're not called one is out of courtesy to your former greatness.

    3. Re:Why yes, yes we do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's me, ppluta, only I don't have my /. cookie at home and no password handy.
      First of all why "you guys in Italy"? I'm from Poland. You think if someone knows anything about a country he must be a citizen of it? Maybe you do it in US, but we in Poland like to know what happens around the world. A matter of limits of mind horizons.
      Anyway, you wanted to insult the Italians. Well, it's your problem. If you had known anything about history you'd know that Italy has never been special world power unless you think about the Roman Empire but for your own good better not admit this. It would prove you have no slightest idea of how history works. Italy has been and is one of the cultural leaders. If you look for the world leader try Great Britain, US's closest friend now. Yes, they've had the world empire and now they don't. Interesting, no communism required, liberal economy was enough.
      To sum up, before EOT - if you think the economical system is the only factor in a country development, geography, neighbours etc. unimportant, well... Even in US I suppose you should not speak it loud among educated people.

  100. I honestly cant watch any of the footage by Fatal0E · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's weird, I don't consider myself squeamish and I used to eat lunch while me and an old boss were checking out the latest additions to Rotten.com's gallery. But I swear to god everytime I see the footage of the planes hitting the towers I get this weird feeling in the pit of my stomach. I've never had that happen before where some image has an adverse reaction on me and I cant even begin to explain it.

    And I said it last year and I'll say it again this year... I'm still really pissed off about those palistineans dancing in the streets with joy while downtown Manhattan was busy getting covered in 2 inches of soot.

    1. Re:I honestly cant watch any of the footage by shren · · Score: 2

      I'm still really pissed off about those palistineans dancing in the streets with joy while downtown Manhattan was busy getting covered in 2 inches of soot.

      Wasn't it revealed that in at least a few cases stock photographs were used?

      --
      Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
    2. Re:I honestly cant watch any of the footage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "still really pissed off about those palistineans dancing in the streets with joy while downtown Manhattan was busy getting covered in 2 inches of soot"

      How much effort, if any, have you put into honestly trying to understand their behaviour? (Note: it certainly wasn't just Palestinians - it was Muslims from the whole region)? You may need to read news sources you`ve not bothered to read before, like the English language versions of foreign papers/websites/radio stations. Are you curious to know why? Or are you just angry because `any sane person would be upset - they aren't upset, therefore they are weird and stupid`? I can't believe you`ve not heard at least one single person suggest that the palestinians hate americans because america gives israel the tanks, planes and guns with which to shoot palestinian children who dare to exist on what was their own land before israel stole it at gunpoint, in breach of UN resolutions.

      You could do worse that check out that resolution - it`d make a good starting point.

      BTW: at the end of it, you`ll probably still find the celebrations distasteful - i still do - but at least you`ll know why they are doing it.

    3. Re:I honestly cant watch any of the footage by tenchiken · · Score: 2

      Nope. They were not fabricated. The PA then forbit any journalists to record pictures of it, and confiscated more cameras.

    4. Re:I honestly cant watch any of the footage by shren · · Score: 2

      I'm not suggesting fabrication. I just recall that some people were bothered that a news agency used old footage of Palestinians celebrating US suffering, from far before 9/11

      --
      Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
    5. Re:I honestly cant watch any of the footage by PC_Freak · · Score: 1
      Wasn't it revealed that in at least a few cases stock photographs were used?
      That's what I've heard as well, from multiple sources: that the film clips of people "dancing in the streets" was from an event that occurred about a year prior [to the September terrorist attacks].

      Unfortunately, I've only heard this statement spoken: I haven't seen it printed in a newspaper or written on a website, though I'm told that's where my "sources" got it from (websites that investigate story credibility). Can anyone point to somewhere that we can all confirm this?

      -PC_Freak

    6. Re:I honestly cant watch any of the footage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wasn't it revealed that in at least a few cases stock photographs were used? "

      I heard that, but it really doesn't matter. They were dancing all over the Middle East.

    7. Re:I honestly cant watch any of the footage by CoreWalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I can't really watch the coverage either.
      I didn't know anyone in the two towers personally. I had been to New York a few times and had seen the towers (never went in, though). I have a cousin who used to live in New York, and one of her friends was within a few blocks when it happened. That's probably my closest personal connection to the tragedy, but there is something about the whole thing that is so sad and pointless that I can't help but feel that same queasyness in the pit of my stomach.
      It's the little things that seem to be the hardest to deal with, though: I can generally avoid most of the coverage, but I will never be able to look at a skyscaper without being able to clearly picture an airplane flying into it, and I will never see an airplane flying overhead and not fear for who might be flying it and what their intentions may be.

      For better or worse, I lost my innocence on September 11, 2001.

    8. Re:I honestly cant watch any of the footage by wass · · Score: 2
      The story of CNN faking it's camera footage of the Palestinians celebrating the attacks has been demonstrated to be Urban Legend .

      It was reported that the celebrating Palestinians were there celebrating when Iraq invaded Kuwait (ironically, an occupied people celebrating the recent occupation of another people), but this has been disproved through the above link with quotes by CNN and Reuters executives.

      Also noted in the link is the Palestinian Authority's attempts to confiscate footage of the celebrations.

      --

      make world, not war

    9. Re:I honestly cant watch any of the footage by dknig1b · · Score: 1

      ...and I'm really pissed about watching all the Americans at the Steelers game cheering as we began bombing Kabul.

    10. Re:I honestly cant watch any of the footage by Fjord · · Score: 2

      It was an unrban legend. The pictures were real.

      --
      -no broken link
  101. One Year On: What has America Learnt? by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

    One year has passed since the United States faced the attacks that will be associated with this date, 11 September, for a great many years to come.

    It would seem appropriate at this time to look back to see how America has changed, specifically in its relationship with other countries.

    Why do religious extremists justify attacking America? What is it that makes citizens of foreign countries hate America? And is America doing anything to counteract this problem?

  102. Thoughts while watching m simulator run by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1
    I'm sitting here, waiting for my simulation to finish, trying to have a normal day. I listened to "Classic Rock" on the way in instead of NPR. I drove over the bridge from which I saw a plume of smoke rising from the pentagon on September 12.

    There is a real tension between people who feel it's important to comemorate the day, and people who feel that it serves no purpose.

    So what is the point of remembering? An event like the terrorist attacks rips back the surface, and exposes the stuff going on underneath. Some of that stuff is very ugly, and some is very good. So we commemorate and remember to get that glimpse under the surface again.

    Looking under the surface is supposed to push us forward, to give us some direction. For me that means listening to my two Muslim collegues, with whom I rarely talk about politics, about how their lives at home have changed. And telling them about how my life, as a jew, has changed. And telling them about the prejudice my father faced when he was growing up Jewish in America in the 30's and 40's, to let them know that things can change here, over time.

    What I am proud of about America is that it is a place where a jew and a muslim can work together, a nd connect over living in a majority culture that is not ours.

    What makes me ashamed about America is that there still are, and will always be, people who will blindly hate us.

    So by commemorating, I hope to keep these two opposed visions in my mind, to remind me to push, in my own small way, to the correct one.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  103. Does Anyone Know by miracle69 · · Score: 2

    If the outer shell of the Pentagon was completed.

    I know they set an ambitious date to have the outer corridor fixed by today. Did they make it?

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
    1. Re:Does Anyone Know by Tazzy531 · · Score: 2

      Isn't the backdrop to the Pentagon Memorial Ceremony the completed wing? They could have just done the outside and have not finished the interior

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    2. Re:Does Anyone Know by Kredal · · Score: 2

      Yes, they did. It's being rededicated as part of the ceremony going on there.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  104. Today's TV Schedule by CritterNYC · · Score: 2

    I believe all the major networks are running special programming and are commercial free for the entire day today. I have a a schedule of the major US TV networks up at the WorldTradeAftermath.com website.

  105. I don't know about you.. by motardo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but I've had a rush of emotions daily ever since September 11th of last year, the images of the planes crashing into the towers, the billowing smoke of the pentagon, and the crater left in Pennsylvania have had a very lasting impression on me.

    One thing that I don't like which has come out of this is how President Bush is pushing his agenda on regime change in Iraq. He has not stepped forward with any kind of reassurance which will lead me to believe that a regime change should be possible. Is President Bush not worried about "blowback", which is what happened when we helped the mujahadeen in Afghanistan when they were fighting the Russian army. I can easily see some major "blowback" happening to the United States in the coming future if we are not careful and think ahead.

    Never Forget.

    1. Re:I don't know about you.. by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      Just to let you know, Bill Clinton and Tom Daschle both talked about the need for a regime change in Iraq back in 1998. Now that a Republican is president, liberals are playing politics by saying its about oil and whatnot. Its about a crazed leader of a country having the ability to kill many people.

    2. Re:I don't know about you.. by motardo · · Score: 2

      Talking about it, and talking OPENLY (and probably acting upon it) is two different things. I never said that it was a partisan thing either.

    3. Re:I don't know about you.. by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      Well, I hope you feel good knowing that Saddam has weapons of mass desctructions. Then when he bombs Isreal, Kuwait, or whoever, you will come post messages saying "GW Bush should have put a stop to this before it happened."

    4. Re:I don't know about you.. by inerte · · Score: 1

      Is President Bush not worried about "blowback", which is what happened when we helped the mujahadeen in Afghanistan when they were fighting the Russian army.

      I guess not. Since the USA already is building an oil duct in Afghanistan, what the first war was all about (territory control to transport oil), then we can expect that the interest on that area will increase.

      And with interest, come investitors.

      It's capitalism saving the world again!

    5. Re:I don't know about you.. by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      Just to let you know, Bill Clinton and Tom Daschle both talked about the need for a regime change in Iraq back in 1998. Now that a Republican is president, liberals are playing politics by saying its about oil and whatnot. Its about a crazed leader of a country having the ability to kill many people.

      You need to stop getting your facts (and your opinions) from Sean Hannity.

      Yes, Bill Clinton talked of a need for a regime change in Iraq back in 1998 .. but he talked of that change coming from within Iraq. It is no business of ours until and unless Iraq attacks us. In this country, we don't invade other countries without provocation (at least we didn't).

      Secondly, find me a quote from 1998 where Daschle even mentioned a regime change in Iraq. You can't. That was completely made up by Hannity. Also, Tom Daschle now is not opposing a regime change in Iraq... in fact he has said the exact opposite.

      Form your own opinions. Don't let a Republican hack like Sean Hannity tell you what to think.

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

    6. Re:I don't know about you.. by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh....
      Gee, who have we attacked without provocation?

      Somalia
      Germany
      Iraq
      Libya

      These, just to name a few... As the only superpower we must be responsible in making sure crazy idiots don't opress millions and threaten an entire region with nuclear capacity and biological warefare. Stop your loathing of the United States for a little bit and open your eyes!

    7. Re:I don't know about you.. by jgkastra · · Score: 1

      What if Iraq launches a chemical weapon on Israel? We have to go in and support them, because the US (most of the time, to my knowledge) backs our allies. History repeats, and the World War I scenario happens again.

      What if the US goes in after Saddam? We (possibly) will set up a puppet government and anger people in the Middle East, but it seems the Iraqis like the idea of self-rule, even if their comrades are holding automatic weapons...

      Either way everyone loses, because lives are lost, but I don't want to be drafted to fight a war.

    8. Re:I don't know about you.. by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      Somalia - We didn't "attack" the nation of Somalia. We went there as part of a UN mission to bring order to a civil war situation. We never remotely came close to a "war" with Somalia... we fought warlords within Somalia to protect the food and medical shipments to the Somali people. Very different... And...history has shown that this was a BIG mistake anyway.

      Germany - We didn't declare war on Germany in WWII until Germany joined Japan and Italy to form the axis. We were at war with Japan, and all of their allies (including Germany) in direct response to an attack on our soil. In WWI, we didn't declare war on Germany until their U-boats sunk the Lusitania and killed Americans.

      Iraq - The act of provocation was Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Our treaties and our standing in the UN required us to come to the defense of one of our allies. The provocation came in August of 1990 when Saddam invaded one of our allies.

      Libya - We bombed Libya in direct response to evidence linking them with the downing of an airliner carrying U.S. citizens over Lockerbie Scotland.

      You really need to learn your history, bub. Each of the examples you listed are examples of the U.S. springing into action as a direct result of direct provocation!

      As for your last comment, I would say from reading your postings that I loathe America and what it stands for a lot less than you. America stands for the words of the Constitution. We do NOT invade a country without provocation, at least we didn't until now. All of these nations around the world are always accusing us of being "imperialistic" and it has ALWAYS been false. Not since the Native Americans have we actively TAKEN land from any other peoples without provocation. Despite defeating Japan and Germany in war, we grabbed none of their natural resources or land. But if we invade Iraq without provocation, we will become the imperialists that the world always accuses us of being.

      As the only superpower it is incumbent upon us to set the example. The example that you can't overthrow another nation's government, no matter how bad it is, without provocation. What's to stop the North Koreans from invading South Korea because they "fear they might get weapons of mass destruction?" What's to stop the Pakistani's from invading India because India has nukes pointed at Pakistan (or vice versa)?

      As the only superpower, and a nation that should do what's right even when it isn't popular, we have to set the example that even though we have the ability to do so, we CANNOT dictate the nature of other sovereign nations' governments.

      Look, I want Saddam to go away as much as you do. But how is Saddam worse than Castro? Fidel Castro has spent nearly 50 years bent on the destruction of the United States, yet other than the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, we have dealt with him using a policy of containment. And it has worked. We spent 50 years with Soviet missiles aimed at our cities, yet we NEVER talked about invading Moscow to affect a "regime change".

      This is about three things:

      a. Saving daddy's legacy.
      b. Securing Iraqi oil.
      c. Diversion from the fact that we haven't gotten Bin Laden yet.

      YOU need to open YOUR eyes. The minute we begin to march on Baghdad is the minute Saddam *DOES* use his chemical and biological weapons. On our bases in Qatar and Saudi Arabia...on our aircraft carriers in the gulf...on our troops in the field....on Tel Aviv....on Jerusalem. What incentive would he have to hold them back? None.

      Your a sheep. You are blindly following your leaders into hell.

      As a proud American, I will do my best to prevent the trampling of our Constitution.... I will speak out when my Government becomes like those we despise.

      It is offensive for you to imply that those of us who disagree with this administration "loathe" America. You, sir, are a Republican's wet dream. You blindly follow those that would put you in jeapordy because they wave a flag in front of you and play to the worst part of your nature. You are a mindless limbot. You quote Sean Hannity, of all people, on slashdot because you can't form opinions of your own.

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

  106. The Primary Civil Right by snatchitup · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Life

    Don't forget this when you go out and cry, "My civil rights are diminished...."

    Life means, we have a right to be secure. It's the job of our govt. to enforce this right.

    Liberty is second to life but above all others. What kind of liberty does a dead-man enjoy?

    Happiness is third. I can't be that happy if I have to worry about terrorism killing a loved one and I'm not free (liberated).

    All the other Civil Rights pale in comparison Life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. They are merely derived from these three. They're hardly even honorable mentions compared to these three, but I'll mention some of them, (Privacy, Speech, Association, Expression, Religion).

    That's what I'm thinking about and I'm also reflecting on this question.

    What am I willing to die for?

    Not much as I'm a coward (though not anonymous).

    I think, however, I'm willing to die for my family. Hopefully, I'll never have the chance to prove this.

    With that said, I'm in awe at our armed servicemen. I find in inconceivable that they are willing to die for me. They deserve my greatest respect.

    1. Re:The Primary Civil Right by inerte · · Score: 1

      Liberty is second to life but above all others. What kind of liberty does a dead-man enjoy?

      And what kind of life does a man without freedom enjoy?

    2. Re:The Primary Civil Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point one: You have the right to the PURSUIT OF happiness. Strive for it, look for it BUT HAPPINESS itself is not something that is guaranteed to you.

      Point Two: All the other "civil rights" That "pale in comparison" Are in essence Number two on your list. The right to Liberty. They aren't seperate, or less important, they are part of the three most important things, Three Inailiable things that all human beings have. The rights to Life Liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And that includes all those "derived"

      And I suppose that if you consider yourself a coward then you probably are. However I forget the source but someone once said that "Only those things worth dieing for are worth living for"

      And those armed servicemen - and women. They arent dying for you. They may think they are, and you may think they are. But they are nothing more than pawns for the government and all the really powerful groups in this county, Big oil, the Media, ect... Honestly if you think they are bombing the hell out of some poor unindustrialized country FOR YOU, than you you are sadly misinformed.

      Thank you, come again.
      Tim

    3. Re:The Primary Civil Right by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Life means, we have a right to be secure. It's the job of our govt. to enforce this right.

      Liberty is second to life but above all others. What kind of liberty does a dead-man enjoy?

      Happiness is third. I can't be that happy if I have to worry about terrorism killing a loved one and I'm not free (liberated).

      Each of these rights are inalienable rights. How can one inalienable right be more important than another?

      Declaring that any one of these rights is higher than another is a dangerous game, as it introduces the concept that the other two can be marginalized for the sake of bolstering the one. It doesn't work that way.

      You (and I) each have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Actually being happy is the sole responsability of the individual. That you lose happiness over worrying about terrorist attacks is not the government's fault; what could the government do to actually make every American happy?

      What am I willing to die for?

      Not much as I'm a coward (though not anonymous).

      Then, sadly, you will always be subject to the will of those who are willing to die for greater causes. The sheep do not guide the shepard, nor do they eat the wolf.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    4. Re:The Primary Civil Right by Houdini91 · · Score: 1

      And what kind of freedom does a dead man enjoy?

    5. Re:The Primary Civil Right by eduardo · · Score: 1
      "And those armed servicemen - and women. They arent dying for you. They may think they are, and you may think they are. But they are nothing more than pawns for the government and all the really powerful groups in this county, Big oil, the Media, ect... Honestly if you think they are bombing the hell out of some poor unindustrialized country FOR YOU, than you you are sadly misinformed."

      Tim (or Anonymous Coward), I think your view on this is very jaded.

      Do you think the government's response against the regime that supported this terrorism was not done "FOR YOU" or for the families of those who died in NYC, DC and PA?

    6. Re:The Primary Civil Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather have death than live without my freedom, it's the most addictive thing I know. Not only would I die for my familys freedom, I'd die for any Americans freedom, like my ancestors before me did.

      Yes, I will be in the front of the line. Suicidal? Crazy? No, Addict.

      Live free or die.

    7. Re:The Primary Civil Right by rattler14 · · Score: 1

      >Liberty is second to life but above all others. What kind of liberty does a dead-man enjoy?

      i would rather live 10 more years with the freedoms to live my life as i see fit, then live a 100 more in society where i live my life based on the whims of the politicians in power

      even though you lived a shorter life... at least you were given the chance to live

      --
      my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
    8. Re:The Primary Civil Right by snatchitup · · Score: 1

      >

      Maybe so, but I bet in 10 years' time, you'd wished you'd changed your mind.

      I don't buy the idiom, "Better off dead".

    9. Re:The Primary Civil Right by rattler14 · · Score: 1

      the only reason i'd wish to change my mind, was that i actually had those 10 years, and i would be pissed that i couldn't spend them all that way

      if i had to spend 100 the other way, well, i guess technically, living is better than not living, but why split hairs here

      --
      my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
    10. Re:The Primary Civil Right by snatchitup · · Score: 1



      Yep, we're just splitting hairs.

      In my original post when I said I was a coward, it was more a Rhetorical statement... "Am I a coward?" "I really don't know until faced with the decision of giving up my life for my countrymens' freedom."

      I'm not going to go out of my way right now to find out, I feel I have too much to live for. But, I would probably be willing to take calculated risks. I always need some decent odds of survival.

      I would really not like to be part of a suicide attack brigade.

      There are all sorts of fitting quotes...

      "Live to see tomorrow",

      "Those who run away today, live to fight another day",

      "That which does not kill me makes me stronger"

      and then there's

      "Duty, Honor, Country". ...
      My original point can be summed up as, "What (Place you civil right here) does one enjoy in death".

      The only joy may be peace.

    11. Re:The Primary Civil Right by egarrido16 · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to Locke, we are entitled to:

      1. Life,
      2. Liberty, and
      3. Property.

      Looks like by that definition I have all three.

      Well, Until Palladium.

      --
      "Brevity is the soul of wit." -Polonius, Hamlet.
    12. Re:The Primary Civil Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Government of the people by the vested powers, for the vested powers, must disappear from the earth.

      Then you can speak of liberties and rights,
      sacrifice and duty in an intelligible sense.

    13. Re:The Primary Civil Right by ESarge · · Score: 1

      "those who would give up essential liberty for temporary security deserves neither liberty nor security"

      Benjamin Franklin

    14. Re:The Primary Civil Right by Shelled · · Score: 2

      "Privacy, Speech, Association, Expression, Religion" are all components and results of Liberty. Sorry, can't have the last without the rest.

    15. Re:The Primary Civil Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What our armed services are doing is defending the Constitution of the United States and all that it stands for. Yes, that does put an ideal above life and family. It is a very noble thing.

      It's too bad that you cannot rise to the same occasion, yet willingly partake in the benefits. You do have a civil duty, you know.

    16. Re:The Primary Civil Right by inerte · · Score: 1

      And what kind of freedom does a dead man enjoy?

      You are dead when you lose your freedom.

  107. Bleh. by Kredal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was at work, wondering when my boss would get to the punchline.. "A plane crashed into the WTC.." "And??"

    All of this memorial stuff is getting very overdone though...

    Where were you on Jan 26, 2001? Do you remember any news that happened that day at all?

    On that date, an earthquake hit India, leaving 13,000 people dead.

    thirteen thousand. More than four times the amount killed in the World Trade Center. Think about that for a minute. How much coverage of it did you see on CNN? Maybe a day?

    We've been hearing about this same story (Even giving it a catchy title) for an entire year now. How about a sense of perspective, folks?

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    1. Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm tired of hearing about this damn earthquake in India. There were big ones in Turkey, Japan, and Afghanistan in recent memory too. Who gives a fuck ? If you think that's relevant, consider this: 6 million Jews also died of Natural Causes in the last ten years.

      If you think that people's different reactions to the earthquakes, Bangledesh floods, AIDS, etc as opposed to the terrorist attacks is somehow hypocritical, or if you are insightful for noticing it, then socially you are 4 years old.

      Not surprising to find a lot of social retards among computer users. I've been dealing with the "look how smart I am, I found a death toll greater than 3,000 in a news story and comared it to 9/11" syndrome among my co-workers.

    2. Re:Bleh. by zaren · · Score: 2

      On that day, I was in my cubicle at work when I read the news. I spent a good part of that day in the office of a friend and co-worker, talking with him about the family he had in India, hoping that they weren't affected by the earthquake.

      And, not to be rude, but what sort of perspective are you hoping to find? It's a national story, a huge story about death and destruction. Every nation focuses on their national stories first, even at the expense of dramatic stories from otgher parts of the world.

      I seem to recall that the earthquake in India was on the US news for weeks afterwards, and the coverage didn't stop until foreign aid started arriving. I'm sure that if you checked the Indian media in the days and weeks before the first anniversary of the earthquake, you'd likely have seen the same kind of coverage that this whole 9/11 thing has gotten... because it's *their* news, it's national, it's local, it affected them DIRECTLY.

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    3. Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to those in India was a natural disaster. It was terrible loss of life I agree, but what makes the WTC attack more sad is that it was a result of hatred by man and was a pointless action to prove someones radical idealism. The people of the WTC didn't just die, they where murdered by another human being.

    4. Re:Bleh. by Yonder+Way · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a huge difference between the death toll at the WTC and the death toll in India during the big earthquake. The earthquake was a natural act. This doesn't make it a good thing by any measure, but you cannot hold a person or group responsible for the death toll. The WTC attack, while having a much lower death toll (but still a staggering figure) was a cold and calculated attack against innocent victims. This was a senseless act of mass murder, and individual people can be held totally accountable for the death toll. Natural disasters are tragedies, too. But they are part of nature's cycle. The WTC attacks were anything but natural. Try to keep things in proper perspective.

    5. Re:Bleh. by Kredal · · Score: 2

      Ahh, so the deaths in India were caused by the direct action of God or Allah... and the WTC tragedy was caused by religious zealots. So, what's the difference? Oh ya, that same factor of four.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    6. Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you officially qualify as a nutcase.

    7. Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm sorry, but 9/11 is more an excuse for abuse of political power right now as I see. I'm more sad that all those that died have their deaths tied to the crap that the government has done since 9/11.

      How many more will die because we shorted many other departments of the government and threw it all into military? ( Before you make a fool out of yourself, do yourself a favor and actually LOOK at the budget before spazzing out. ) How many will die because we were too busy mourning those that have passed away already instead of helping those who are in need NOW?

      Celebrates and corperations will continue to feed off 9/11 for attention alone until everyone stops being so guilible. And if anything, everyone hates America 10x more today than they did in 9/11. Maybe security is enhanced, but right now we're busy making a lot of enemies in the world.

      Most news sources give you the news you want to hear. I seriously suggest going to a direct news source that doesn't only post the Reuters / AP stories that they think are appropriate.

      Just a reminder - more people die in Africa from a SINGLE disease daily than die in 9/11. Many deadly disease take lives of innocents daily. Do you lend them the same ears? No, their cries go mainly unheard by the powers that be. Sure, we put some cash towards helping them, but its just enough to make politicians look like they care. In reality, we just plain ignore their castastrophy.

      Just go look at the numbers. Sept. 11th was a tragedy, but when it comes to playing with 'the big boys of death', it doesn't even come close. 2,000 some deaths versus tens of millions of death?

      If anything, with 9/11 we've shown the world just how much power we've had all along, and just how ignorant we are when it comes to using this power. This power now seems completely focused on the military, instead of helping others in much worst conditions. Maybe helping countries stop dying from something as trivial as hunger would be a wonderful start. ( But they don't count? Yeah, now look who is brainwashed. )

      All in all, I'd say disease is the real threat to humanity presently. Many people suffer from it, and many people die from it. How about huge government projects researching into new treatments for diseases? Or spreading the current lifesaving treatments we have to those that need them TO LIVE. This isn't just a pipedream, people. We have the means to do it, but not the will.

      Anyways, I'm going to try to not laugh in someones face today when they put on their tragic faces. Yes, it was a tragedy. Get over it. It's over. Move on. Help people who need help now, and stop doing what anyone could do - just mourn.

    8. Re:Bleh. by wazzzup · · Score: 1, Redundant

      One was an uncontrollable natural disaster.

      The other was a deliberate act of evil and hatred formed and nurtured in the hearts and minds of our fellow men.

      There's a difference. If you don't get it, then no amount of explaining will help.

    9. Re:Bleh. by HLN · · Score: 1

      As I see it, there's a huge difference in an earthquake and what happened a year ago.
      Natural disasters like earthquakes are out of all human control and there's realy nothing you can do about it other than helping the victims.

      The issue isn't about how many people that died, but what caused their deaths.

      What makes the terrorist attacks on NY and Washinton so horrible and uncomprehensible is the fact that it was performed by human beings and evidently it was very carefully planned. Even if only a thousand persons had died that day, it would still be a matter of unlimited discussion since it brought upon us a completely new view of what such terror groups are capable of.
      We're all "used" to suicide bombers, car bombs and such methods and their powers are limited.
      The use of living humans in an air plane as a missile to kill other living humans is just... horrible and people need discuss it to be able to comprehend what really happened and why it happened.

    10. Re:Bleh. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference here - that was an earthquake and this was a man-made destruction brought about by the actions of a coward and his brain-washed followers.

      Had the earthquake been caused by someone equally cowardly, its likely that it would've gotten more attention.

      While either are tragic, the attacks on the US were more horrifying to more people as this wasn't something that had happened before. Earthquakes have been happening since the dawn of recorded history. No one ever used a fully-loaded airliner as a device of mass-murder before.

      Personally, I hope that Bin Ladin is still alive and that the US catches the SOB. I'd *pay* to watch his sorry ass tortured and killed at the hands of the US.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    11. Re:Bleh. by akintayo · · Score: 1

      Natural disasters like earthquakes may be outside the realm of our control, but the death toll due to such natural disasters is not. So while the fact that there is an earthquake is not as newsworthy, the fact that 13,000(quoting from above) died is. In fact, it is moreso because the death toll is high because of poverty and apathy.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    12. Re:Bleh. by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      " I was at work, wondering when my boss would get to the punchline.. "A plane crashed into the WTC.." "And??""

      Could have been worse. The night before my roommate said he needed a ride someplace in the morning. I told him he'd have to wake me up and he said something to the effect "Don't worry, I will."

      So of course I didn't believe him when he came in and woke me up that morning. The way he was talking/babbling, it sounded like a "conventional" attack, and I was left wondering who the heck would be so stupid to attack the US. So I didn't believe him until I started hearing the radio.

      "On that date, an earthquake hit India, leaving 13,000 people dead."

      Like it or not, acts of nature that kill thousands happen all th etime. Acts of lunatics that kill thousands, on the other hand, are a bit more rare.

      At any rate, I still barely watch TV and I don't intend to watch any more or less TV today than usual.

    13. Re:Bleh. by SplendidIsolatn · · Score: 2

      ~~ 3,000 dead 9/11/01 -- Acts of terrorism, acts of murder
      ~~ 13,000 dead 1/26/01 -- Act of nature

      Nobody hijacked a plane to cause an earthquake where 13,000 people died. Acts of nature are an (unfortunate) part of life. There's no investigation when there's an earthquake. There's no retaliation when a volcano explodes. When floods occur we don't declare 'war'.

      Both are horrible tragedies, but to compare the outrage and coverage is comparing apples and oranges.

      --
      sig--we don't need no goddamn sig
    14. Re:Bleh. by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      The very notion that the relative significance of human tragedies can be ranked in terms of their respective bodycounts...is itself sickening.

    15. Re:Bleh. by nebby · · Score: 2

      I find your ideas interesting, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      --
    16. Re:Bleh. by Professor+J+Frink · · Score: 2
      So if the terrorist attack on the WTC had only killed 4 people would it have caused global outrage? Small numbers of people are killed by acts of terrorism on a daily basis but we hear little or nothing about them.

      9/11 killed a lot of people. Thus it is very significant. The earthquake killed far more. That one group of people were, to all intents and purposes, murdered, and the others killed by a natural event does not change the fact that those people died. It does not change the grief experienced by the suddenly bereaved loved ones.

      The fact that certain groups are willing to kill others because of their beliefs is of great importance. This is not, however (and this is the big point), intimately linked to the deaths of those people on 9/11. I do not see why I should mourn more the death of someone before their time when it was by 'murder' than if the exact same person had been run over by a bus.

      I am concerned about terrorism but I am not going to grade grief by political measures. If I do anything special today it will be to observe a minute of thought about the evil that men do to each other. I will not observe a minute of silence or whatever for the people who died in 9/11 any more than I would for anyone else that had died. Especially as those deaths had no personal connection to me whatsoever.

      There is a media hysteria arround these things nowdays (cf Diana dying and crazy amounts of public grief going on there) and I am quite frankly fed up of this modern passtime of public grief for people you've never met or known in any way at all.

      --
      "Don't get mad, get a monkey!"
    17. Re:Bleh. by benreece · · Score: 2, Funny

      God is allowed to kill people. People aren't.

    18. Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your reasoning. However, do you (or any average American) stop for a minute anually to think about the atrocities done the 6th and 9th August, 1945? That "senseless act of mass murder", done to Man by Man, is IMNSHO a much worse crime than the WTC (which of course is terrible, too - disgusting to say the least). What do the average American feel about it?

    19. Re:Bleh. by Fwonkas · · Score: 1

      Interesting that this was mentioned... I actually remember talking about this in a philosophy class a year and a half ago. I don't remember what the discussion was about, exactly, but I remember bringing up the earthquake. I basically pointed out how most of us saw it on tv or read about it, said "Gee, that sucks" and forgot about it. I asked if anyone in the class had given it any more thought than that, or had shed a single tear for the 13,000 dead (I wasn't preaching - I hadn't had much of a reaction either).

      Anyway, no one really said anything, except one girl who said that she had cried for them. I found it pretty moving that even one person had that reaction.

      I know a lot of people responded to your post about natural disasters blah blah blah. And there's some merit in that, in that there's less anger. Both types of disasters share the reaction of shock, horror and sadness, though, and today I feel that more than anger when thinking about 9/11.

      --
      COMPUTER! Whatever happened to Blueberry Muffin?
    20. Re:Bleh. by 5KVGhost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a difference between people dying in a natural disaster and people being murdered as a deliberate act. You know that as well as I do, and pretending that you don't is dishonest.

    21. Re:Bleh. by odin53 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, so the deaths in India were caused by the direct action of God or Allah... and the WTC tragedy was caused by religious zealots. So, what's the difference? Oh ya, that same factor of four.

      If you can't see the difference (besides the number of deaths) between "God" and religious zealots, you're an utter moron. And a remarkably bad (or good, depending on one's point of view) troll.

    22. Re:Bleh. by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      Difference is that the Japanese refused to surrender or negotiate. They wanted to take over our nation, they wanted to conquer us. They attacked us first. They refused to surrender even after the first bombing. That shows me that they didn't even care enough about their own people to surrender after that attack. They decided to sacrifice more of their own people because they thought that they could still win. I think any government that condones kamikaze attacks has shown that extreme measures are required to defeat them.

      And remember, the most important thing: They wanted to take over the United States.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    23. Re:Bleh. by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      If someone else wants to profess their grief (publicly or privately) that is their Right.

      If you choose not to mourn that is your right as well. If you refuse to see a difference between natural occurences and mass-murder...well, that is your right and your opinion but I think many people would agree that it is an extremely insensitive attitude.

      Also, I find it grossly inappropriate to lecture mourners, telling them that their personal grief is unjustified. That is the offensive attitude that I was addressing in my previous post.

    24. Re:Bleh. by istartedi · · Score: 2

      I was at work, wondering when my boss would get to the punchline

      Ditto here! I was on Slashdot and thought it was Yet Another Internet Hoax(TM). I guess that was part denial since it didn't have the flavor of your usual hoax. I had to turn on the TV to start believing it was real. I still had a hard time convincing myself it was real and that some hacker hadn't grabbed the satellite like they did in China. Yes, I knew it was real, but part of me kept saying "no". Later that night, I pulled out some old pictures of me and a friend standing on the Brooklyn Bridge, WTC in the background. I just stared at them for a while. It was real.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    25. Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      13000 dead in the Indian quake, 2600ish dead in 9.11

      That gives us a nice 5:1 ratio. 1 murder is worth 5 accidental deaths.

    26. Re:Bleh. by catch23 · · Score: 1

      you know, a lot more died from the black plague long long long time ago.... are we mourning their deaths too?

    27. Re:Bleh. by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between people dying in a natural disaster and people being murdered as a deliberate act. Wake up. Parent post was describing numbers dead related to the amount of coverage on CNN for the incident.

    28. Re:Bleh. by nobodyman · · Score: 2

      I try not to criticize the reason why people suddenly become more appreciative of life and the world around them. Yes, less people died from the terrorist attacks than the horrible earthquake India.

      But should we say to people that it is wrong to feel the way they do? Should we tell people to honor the dead 1/4th as much? To not phone relatives and say how much they love them? To be 25 percent less contemplative, or sad, or thankful to be alive?

      For me it took one death to make me re-evaluate life. Early in the morning on September 12 of last year a man in my city was planting flowers outside of the convenience store that he owned. He was shot and killed that morning by a man who saw the color of his skin and wanted "revenge" for the day before. As he was taken away by police he screamed "I'm all for the USA!".

      It made me think about the senselessness of violence and death, and the cruel inequity of good people slain by the ignorant, corrupt, and misguided. It reaffirmed in me the knowledge that no-one is promised tomorrow, and that no day should go by without letting our friends and loved-ones know how much we value them.

      One death. An almost insignificant figure in the myriad of statistics that we see every day.

      With that in mind, should we discount the attention that is paid to this event in which less people died than in other tragedies? No.

      The numbers are irrelevant. What is importannt is what we take away from this tragedy. How can we learn and somehow rise above the terrible things that happen in the world.

    29. Re:Bleh. by Yonder+Way · · Score: 1

      Again, try to keep things in perspective.

      I think the average American, whether they were alive or not back then, doesn't really have a concept of the gravity of the two bombs we dropped. This is due in large part to the difference in journalism between then and now. You didn't have as many crazy journalists like Geraldo Rivera who would go right into the face of danger with a camera crew to bring Americans into the battlefront. Americans, then and now, have no concept of the level of destruction that was unleashed that day.

      But on the flip side, we were responding to a threat that was only somewhat less insidious than the one we face today. At least back then, we were fighting against an enemy state and not some shadowy faceless & borderless organization like Al Queda. And they were primarily going after military targets, unlike the cowards we are fighting today. Those differences elevate WWII Japan to a slightly higher level of respect as an adversary, which doesn't say much for the respect I had for them. Remember, they attacked without declaring war on us first.

      I'll only briefly mention that I hold a minority opinion in this country, and state that our president at the time was a traitor for having known of this attack before it happened and he did nothing about it in order to suit his own political ends.

      The Japanese were trying to take over our sovereign nation. That threat alone warrants any necessary retaliatory or preventative force.

      The Japanese were too dumb to surrender, long after most other nations would have. They were putting their children and elderly in harms way because they had lost pretty much all of their able bodied young men. They engaged in cowardly suicide bombing, which totally changes the face of warfare. How do you defend against an enemy who intends to die in order to take out hundreds of your comrades?

      The nukes we dropped served several purposes.

      1. Show the Japanese we weren't kidding, and that they had better surrender. They didn't understand the first time so we said it again a few days later.

      2. Show the fascists in Europe that we weren't kidding, and we would happily wipe them off the map before engaging in another week of war with them. I think this was probably more of a bluff than anything. The idea of dropping a nuke on the European motherland probably wouldn't have gone over well with most Americans back then if they understood the scale of the destructive force being unleashed. The president knew this.

      3. Americans in WWII had a very low opinion of the Japanese. Much much worse than their opinion of the Germans. Indeed, my own grandfather who served in the Pacific Fleet back then cusses whenever he sees anything Japanese, and carries in his wallet a photograph of a Japanese soldier that he killed near Okinawa. While there has been a lot of healing between the older generation of Germans and Americans, there hasn't been a lot of healing with the Japanese in that age group. Thankfully the younger generations have looked beyond the differences of our grandparents (or even great grandparents now).

      In any case, dropping the bomb was done well within international law and the protocols of war. What happened at the WTC was a pure act of terrorism, launched by a faceless enemy, outside of the rules of war. It was a cowardly act, consistent with the spineless nature of the Al Queda.

      Personally, I think the U.S. should put a bullet in Sadam and then pull out of the region 100%. No more support for Israel. No troops in Saudia Arabia. Stop buying their oil. Let them kill each other if that is what they want. We are far enough along now that we could redirect that money into implementing a massive change in our energy sources, and cut our dependence on petroleum products to a fraction of what we currently consume. That would ultimately solve the Middle East problem.

    30. Re:Bleh. by dysjunct · · Score: 1

      More people die every month in car crashes than died in the 9/11 attacks. While murderous intent is not behind these, the decisions made regarding drinking and driving, national auto safety standards, national road safety standards, etc., certainly are deliberate. Where's the outrage over this? The original poster was correct -- 9/11 was a tragedy, but let's keep our sense of perspective.

    31. Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      About Japan:

      I fully agree that they had it coming (attack without warning, kamikaze pilots, etc). You can try to convince me all you want regarding it, I already agree. But does that somehow justify nuking two cities? You make it sound so trivial.

      Show the Japanese we weren't kidding, and that they had better surrender. They didn't understand the first time so we said it again a few days later.

      I am frightened that someone can have this attitude - we're talking about LIVES here!

      I think the parallel is quite clear here. The massacre of japanese civilians was OK because that made them do what the US wanted them to in the end - surrender.

      I fail to see how this is different from the muslim extremists who indeed did slay america civilians - because they wanted the US to change their policy about foreign affairs.

      I find both disgusting.

      You state that you think the U.S. should but a bullet in Saddam. How on earth can you mean something like that and still think you're the good guy? To capture him and bring him to trial - fine. But like everyone else, like Milocevic - he has a right to fair jugdement. Which is why that base in Cuba (I forget its name, where the Taliban prisoners are kept) worries me. Why can't they be tried and punished - isn't this what is making us the Good Guys?

      Anyway, I hope you don't take my rant personally or interpret it as I am saying "you deserved it" - nobody does. Not even those who did it. It's just that the world today fills me with foreboding. I don't like it one bit.

    32. Re:Bleh. by balazsa · · Score: 1

      Something comaparable from present days (about 7 years ago) Bosnia:

      200.000 people killed delibaretly, generally because of ethnical and religious differences.

      Is it comparable?

      --
      Is it right? Not?
    33. Re:Bleh. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      one is an act of nature the effected humans.
      the other is some madmen killing iinnocent humans, can't you see the difference?

      not to mention this is a US site, so it will have US news.

      Not that the earth quake wasn't tragic.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    34. Re:Bleh. by brad3378 · · Score: 2

      > There's a difference between people dying in a natural disaster and people being murdered as a deliberate act. You know that as well as I do, and pretending that you don't is dishonest.

      Nor does it make the lives lost on 9/11 worth more than the lives lost in India or anywhere else. The point the original poster was trying to make was that 9/11 was hyped by the media in a sickening way.

      --

    35. Re:Bleh. by geekee · · Score: 1

      and 50,000 people die on the highway every year. These are accidents and they are tragic. 9/11 was no accident. Next time it could be 300,000 if the terrorists sneak in a nuclear device. 9/11 was not just an accident, it was an attack and now we are in a state of war. People want to know what's going on. How's that for perspective.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    36. Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right to say that there's a difference.

      In the space of 100 days in 1994 (April - June) 800,000 rwandans were killed. That works out at 8000 per day (over twice as many per day as in WTC). Hands up all those who remember about it or see anything about it on the news each year.

    37. Re:Bleh. by vinlud · · Score: 1

      ...cowardly suicide bombing...

      You can say what you want but it's defenitly not an act of cowards, maybe of dumb people, but not cowards... (to the contrary of flying high above a city with tens of thousands of civilian people an dropping your nuclear thingy!)

      Show the Japanese we weren't kidding, and that they had better surrender. They didn't understand the first time so we said it again a few days later.

      The U.S. used violence to get a message to the Japanese so it is 'ok' , and now Al-Qaeda does sort of the same on a smaller scale it is terrorism?

      Note: I'm not trying to approve the actions of Al-Qaeda merely condeming the use of nuclear weapons in 1945.

      In any case, dropping the bomb was done well within international law and the protocols of war.

      I always thought minimizing civilian casualties was part of this, but I have to be wrong.

      Personally, I think the U.S. should put a bullet in Sadam and then pull out of the region 100%. No more support for Israel. No troops in Saudia Arabia.

      If you hadn't got in in the first place there wouldn't be a Saddam and a bin Laden. I'm afraid it's the main reason why you have a Ground Zero in NYC now and I hope the US Gov. agrees with your second half of the sentence, the first half alone doesn't solve anything, may even make things worse.

      --
      Repeat after me: We are all individuals
    38. Re:Bleh. by Yonder+Way · · Score: 1

      You finished off here with something that must be addressed. While the US Government shares in the responsibility for creating the monsters known as Osama Bin Laden and Sadam Hussein, the American citizens (including myself) do not share in this responsibility. The government kept these shadowy ops secret from us, even after the fact, because the government knew that the citizens wouldn't approve.

      Iraq as a state is largely Britain's fault. Iraq is a contrived state with arbitrary borders, and is not based on historical borders or anything. No wonder Tony Blair was in such a rush to GWB's side to help clean up the mess that both governments helped to make in the first place.

      If the oil companies didn't exercise so much control in politics, we'd probably all be on clean renewable fuels by now and no one would care about what was going on in the Middle East.

  108. The U.S. Constitution is not a suicide pact. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It may have escaped your notice, but we're at war.

    In such circumstances, the Constitution gets suspended so it can't be used against us.

    As soon as we've established freedom in the Arab world, we'll go back to where we were.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:The U.S. Constitution is not a suicide pact. by LordHunter317 · · Score: 1

      All of these were signed into law before War was declared. They are therefore, unconstitutional. Also, I don't think a formal declaration of war was ever signed, which is needed to suspend constitutional rights.

    2. Re:The U.S. Constitution is not a suicide pact. by evilned · · Score: 2

      Uh, no we are not. No declaration of war has been made. Martial Law has not been declared. That is what is really scary about this, there is a legal framework for the government to take these kind of powers in emergencies, however that framework was ignored. And for those that think that those procedures take too long, they had enough time to pass the patriot act.

      --

      "My head hurts, My feet stink, and I dont love Jesus." -Jimmy Buffett

    3. Re:The U.S. Constitution is not a suicide pact. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I agree! The Constitution should NOT get suspended! There may be emergencies where there isn't time for Congress to act, but this isn't one of them.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:The U.S. Constitution is not a suicide pact. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are not at war.

      You are allowing your country to become a police state. You are allowing your leaders to commit warcrimes. You are allowing them for instance to keep hundreds of prisoners on guantanamo, without legal representation, without trial. Are they prisoners of war ? Why then, are the conventions regarding prisoners of war not being followed ? Are they criminals, or suspects ? Why then have they no legal counselling.

      What is happening right now, is that President Bush is using 9-11 to strengthen his own power.
      What is happening, is that the things that make your country great is disappearing.

      What is happening is, that you are letting the terrorists win. They killed thousands of Americans on 9-11, but worst of all: They made you afraid. They made you react violently.

      They terrorized you.

    5. Re:The U.S. Constitution is not a suicide pact. by baskil · · Score: 1

      As soon as we've established freedom in the Arab world, we'll go back to where we were.

      You'll see pigs fly before you see widespread adaptation of Western freedom in the Arab world. As long as the radical versions of Shari'ah and Figh is widely accepted in the Arab world, you will not see it. Same thing goes for the lack of speech freedom (as evidenced by Syria's harsh sentencing of democratic protesters), the lack of fair trials (http://hrw.org/press/2002/06/iran0612.htm), and the fact that some countries commit atrocities on their own people (thus keeping them scared to revolt) (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1877 161.stm)(http://hrw.org/press/2002/07/gaza072302.h tm). None of these problems are new, and none of them will be solved by littering the countrysides with shrapnel. The chances of these problems being solved in your lifetime, or your children's, is slim to none. So my question to you is, are you willing to give up your freedoms for the rest of your days so your government can fight a war they can not win?

  109. In memory.. by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

    In memory of Garo Voskerijian who gave me some advice that will carry me for the rest of my life.

    May you rest in peace and may God be with Naida, Shont, Isabelle and Aleene.

    Peace is the answer...

    --
    100% Insightful
  110. US sponsored a lot of UK terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets not forget that the USA used to be a major sponsor of terror attacks in the UK via NORAID.

    1. Re:US sponsored a lot of UK terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because we all hate Brits. Every American, Protestant or Catholic, hates the arrogant, slimy, 2nd rate, weak and puny little country of Britain and its people.

    2. Re:US sponsored a lot of UK terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are a lot of Arabs who feel that way about you - good job this is a Troll.

  111. Underestimated by The+Viking · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The history of the United States is punctuated by times when its people were underestimated:

    1. The American Revolution - England underestimates the ability of a rag-tag militia made up mostly of civilians to free the peoples of the colonies.

    2. WWII - Japan delivers what they thought would be a cripling blow (the bombing of Pearl Harbor), underestimating America's ability to recover and fight back.

    3. Desert Storm - Iraq underestimates America's ability to mobilize a world force to take back Kuwait.

    4. September 11, 2001 - Terrorists turn four commercial airliners into weapons, killing thousands. America unites and fights back.

    I think America is underestimated because outsiders view freedom of religion, freedom of speech, tolerance of different opinions, and open debate as a sign of disunity. Americans agree to disagree, and are passionate about defending the freedoms that allow such diversity.

    1. Re:Underestimated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5. Sometime 10 or 20 years from now, the American people take their country back from a federal government gone insane.

      As you said, never underestimate America.

    2. Re:Underestimated by Cederic · · Score: 2, Flamebait


      Hmm.

      1. England didn't give a shit. Plus you try fighting a war on the moon with no political support, with the Chinese on the other side - that's pretty much the situation the English were in, logistically.

      2. Oh, so it was America alone against the Japanese? No.

      3. Iraq is lied to about America's desire to fight a war in the Middle East, and based on those lies invades a country they'd never have touched had they not been lied to.

      4. America gets a bloody nose from 19 people armed with pocket knives. Half the world silently cheers.

      Let me add some

      5. America tries to assassinate Fidel Castro. For no good reason. Several times. And fails.

      6. America installs puppet Government in [Nicaragua | Grenada | Afghanistan | etc]. America wonders why the world doesn't trust America.

      7. 1960s-70s, America overestimates its own ability to win a war without political backing in Asia. North Vietnamese inflict humiliation

      8. 2002, America invades Afghanistan. Thousands of innocent civilians are killed, hundreds of foreign nationals are tortured and held without trial or rights, the very freedoms Americans are so passionate about defending get reduced and removed.

      9. 2002 America underestimates yet again how much the rest of the world hates their cultural imperialism and self-centred outlook.

      10. 2002, America fails to invade Pakistan, India, South Africa, China, Russia, England, France and several other countries known to have weapons of mass destruction. Arab nations query why Iraq in particular are so special?

      11. 2002, America continues to support Israel, despite many documented abuses of human rights, possession of weapons of mass destruction, continued oppression of their own people.

      Please, stop telling that America is so great. America is every bit as stupid, selfish, jealous, paranoid and incompetant as any other country. And it's considerable more brutal, repressive and intolerant than many.

      To stay on topic: I dont want to remember the 11th September 2001 attack on the world trade center especially. I don't appreciate the flood of tv and radio programs about it. I don't comply with the media attempts to engender a national feeling of mourning about it.
      I would support someone suggesting 'Lets spend a few minutes remembering all the innocent people in Afghanistan that died, were injured and maimed, and have their lives ruined, by the pointless American activities in that region, and indeed lets spare a few thoughts for the unfortunates in Iraq who'll be next against the wall'.

      One single terrorist attack on US soil. Many thousand in the rest of the world. Many of those thousands committed by or on behalf on America. Don't fucking tell me who's innocent.

      ~Cederic

    3. Re:Underestimated by geekee · · Score: 1

      The innocent people who died in Afghanistan are not victims of the US. The US has a right to defend itself when attacked. The Afghan govt is responsible for the loss of life in Afghanistan by harboring the terrorist organization that attacked the US. The were well paid by al queda for their support. The Taliban bears the responsibility for those lost lives. Omar's palace was paid for by their blood as well as al queda money. The US is no more to blame for loss of life in Afghanistan than the allies in WWII are responsble for the loss of innocent German lives. If you have a problem with the US govt. take it up with them. Killing 3000 civilians in NYC doesn't solve anything

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    4. Re:Underestimated by drewness · · Score: 1

      1. The American Revolution - England underestimates the ability of a rag-tag militia made up mostly of civilians to free the peoples of the colonies.
      The French did a good deal of the fighting for us there. Lafayette made the British surrender to Washington instead of him to add insult to injury.
      2. WWII - Japan delivers what they thought would be a cripling blow (the bombing of Pearl Harbor), underestimating America's ability to recover and fight back.
      No, Pearl Harbor was a stop gap to buy enough time to solidify their grip on Asia and get their petroleum supply back before the US could fight back.

    5. Re:Underestimated by dhogaza · · Score: 2

      Actually, England did give a shit during the Revolutionary War. However she was at war with France at the time and France also gave a shit. Without the French Fleet the outcome would've been quite different.

    6. Re:Underestimated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You need to take a step back from your liberal lies and attempt to take an objective, factual view of the situation.

      8. 2002, America invades Afghanistan. Thousands of innocent civilians are killed, hundreds of foreign nationals are tortured and held without trial or rights, the very freedoms Americans are so passionate about defending get reduced and removed.

      An investigation into the total number of civilian deaths in Afghanistan estimated the number to be around 400 - 500. When we were still involved in our air campaign the Taliban was reporting casualities of their own troops as civilian casualities, and this is why euro liberal-socialists such as yourself cry human tragedy. Taliban troops taken out by some JDAMs != Afghan civilians.

      7. 1960s-70s, America overestimates its own ability to win a war without political backing in Asia. North Vietnamese inflict humiliation
      Again, your view upon the situation has caused a statement such as this. The US did not overestimate its ability to win a war without political backing. In fact, we could have easily won the war if we took the fight to the enemy, rather than just trying to protect the south. The command of the military wanted to do this, but the civilian government was against it. The Vietnam conflict could have ended quite quickly if it was not for this political weakness.

      10. 2002, America fails to invade Pakistan, India, South Africa, China, Russia, England, France and several other countries known to have weapons of mass destruction. Arab nations query why Iraq in particular are so special?

      You seem to be trying to create some sort of moral relativity, but that notion is misplaced if you try to understand the whole situation. First, we are targeting Iraq becuase they seem most likely to use their weapons against us. All of those other countries would not use their weapons against us for fear of a massive response by the US. Saddam, on the other hand, thinks differently. He might not overtly attack the US or US interests, but he seems interested in doing it covertly. You cannot say this about any of the other countries you mention, so your attempt at some sort of moral equavilence is misplaced.

      5. America tries to assassinate Fidel Castro. For no good reason. Several times. And fails.
      We have every right to take out Castro. He allowed the Soviets to station numberous nuclear weapons on his country, and therefore was a strategic threat to the US. This act alone demonstrated his hostility towards the US, so we responded. For example, if an unstable dictator came into power of Belgium and pointed nuclear and other dangerous weapons at France, I am sure the French would feel very threatened by this ruler and try to eliminate him.

      11. 2002, America continues to support Israel, despite many documented abuses of human rights, possession of weapons of mass destruction, continued oppression of their own people.
      Israel will not use its nuclear weapons unless attacked by some large force, so the posession of nuclear weapons is of no real threat to us since the only people it threatens are those who would have a war with Israel. Your attempt again at some sort of moral equivalence has again failed.

    7. Re:Underestimated by codingOgre · · Score: 1

      Moderators, please mod up the parent post, it is quite a good.

      --
      Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement. --Red Hot Chili Peppers, Californication
    8. Re:Underestimated by solferino · · Score: 2

      congrats for telling it like it is mate

      like most cowardly bullies, american imperialists (note i did not say all americans) are psychotically sensitive to criticism

      cheers

    9. Re:Underestimated by TulioSerpio · · Score: 2
      5. America tries to assassinate Fidel Castro. For no good reason. Several times. And fails.
      We have every right to take out Castro. He allowed the Soviets to station numberous nuclear weapons on his country, and therefore was a strategic threat to the US. This act alone demonstrated his hostility towards the US, so we responded. For example, if an unstable dictator came into power of Belgium and pointed nuclear and other dangerous weapons at France, I am sure the French would feel very threatened by this ruler and try to eliminate him.


      Are you saying you have the right to kill someone?
      The 11/9/2001 terrorist think the same...
      --

      I'm from Argentina: Tango, Asado, Mate, Gaucho, Maradona, YPF

  112. My sincere condolence by DrunkenPenguin · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1. Bruce Springsteen: The Rising

    2. ====================
      Left the house this morning
      Bells ringing filled the air
      Wearin' the cross of my calling
      On wheels of fire I come rollin' down here

      Can't see nothin' in front of me
      Can't see nothin' coming up behind
      I make my way through this darkness
      I can't feel nothing but this chain that binds me
      Lost track of how far I've gone
      How far I've gone, how high I've climbed
      On my back's a sixty pound stone
      On my shoulder a half mile of line

      There's spirits above and behind me
      Faces gone black, eyes burnin' bright
      May their precious blood bind me
      Lord, as I stand before your fiery light
  113. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by cyranoVR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends.
    --Gandalf

  114. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a joke, right? If not, it is only an attitude that can survive when you are cloistered in a militarily powerful country with a strong police force. Guess what a military and police are? The threat of implied violence!

  115. Nuke Iraq... by I_am_God_Here · · Score: 2, Interesting

    before they nuke us. Saddam own mistress believes they are working on nuclear weapons. What would have happened if we had just let Hitler sit back and develop an arsenal of mass destruction?

    --

    Capitalism: unequal distribution of wealth
    Socialism: equal distribution of poverty
  116. Re:please mod down -1 redundant by james_underscore · · Score: 0, Redundant

    yeah, its nice to see /. editors endorsing karma whoring so blatantly isn't it.

  117. What i remember. by mwjlewis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sunday, I was watching the history channel and saw a special on 9/11 One year later. It gave details to how all the events played out. Things that happened months later, And while I truly appreciate them only showing the buildings on fire once, It still brought chills over my body, and almost tears to my eyes, as SO many people became only memories on that day. I remember sitting in my office (computer helpdesk for law firm) and having one of our attorney's from the NY office on the phone with me and she said "did you hear, a plane just hit one of the trade towers". At that point, I didn't honestly believe it. I was in more of a bit of shock then anything else. So as the true geek in me, I message my boss and apparently inform him of it for the first time as well, at the same time open up a web browser to the NYtimes and there it was a picture of the burning building. It still didn't look real as if it was something in a movie. This was about ten minutes after the first plane hit. Our team (helpdesk) was not sure what to do/think- Accident, terrorism/ real/fake ( although we all knew it was real, just hard to believe) shortly after the second plane hit, we were all watching TV at this time ( computer connections to the websites were well Slow) we all saw the second plane, and (hard to type) [ devastation ]. We then shortly heard there after about the Pentigon and it was really hitting close to home as the office is about 3 to 4 miles from it. There was an office staff meeting, and it was still not apparent as to just HOW serious this was. There was a Muslim guy in there, and jokingly said "I promise, I have nothing to do with it" America under attack. Finally the towers collapsed, and I have seen that video so many times, I honestly wish to NEVER see it again, it is awful to believe and imagine that SO Many good people died on that day. My thoughts and prayers out to the not just the victims, or their families and friends, but to the entire world, because on that day as the entire world was affected, Not just the USA. What was the point of this post, It started because of the drive with your lights on, on 9/11 thread. Maybe I just want to remember all those that lost their lives on that day, and to those that lost loved ones on that day. No comments or words will ever bring that loved one back, but you can always cherish their memories and remember the good times with them.

    --
    www.oobersworld.com - For those that ride.
  118. Lame Coverage by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did anyone see Jim McKay's "They don't want revenge, they wanna be loved" speech during Monday Night Football? Peter Jennings must have written this for him. I for one want revenge. It's the responsibility of the government to protect and distribute justice. They should pay with their lives and all who chanted in support of them should pay with them. They stand united, so should we. ABC TV would have us believe that we should "understand" them better to come to reason. They hate us, they attacked us, they should die. >

  119. Ah yes... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I've heard that slander.

    Another fact-free moron heard from.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  120. www.wherewereyou.org by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you posted your story on wherewereyou.org?

    I discovered the site about a month and a half ago, and the posts are mostly interesting glimpses of other people's lives as feces met fan blades on America's Bad Day. I revisit the site every few days to read the newest posts, and found that posting my own account of where I was and what I did and felt, was oddly therapeutic.

    ~Philly

    1. Re:www.wherewereyou.org by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      No, but I plan to rectify that. I didn't know it was there.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    2. Re:www.wherewereyou.org by Fjord · · Score: 2
      One thing I found kind of odd about the attacks what Bush's recollection of where he was and what he saw. I know that I remember the events in my life around the time of the attack very well. I wasn't alive when Kennedy was shot, but I had heard about how the moment you hear is etched into your mind. I didn't really understand this phenomenon until a year ago today.

      But Bush's recollection of the day is strage. He claimed twice that he saw the first plane hit the building on TV. None of the networks I watched were carrying the first hit during the day, and certainly none could have shown it before the second plane hit. So how does that fit with the following recollection by Bush:


      And my Chief of Staff, Andy Card -- actually, I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident.

      But I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it. And I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my Chief of Staff, who is sitting over here, walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower, America is under attack."
      -- President Bush


      I can understand if this were a gaff brought on by the amount of stress he was going through at the time of the attacks and at the time of the interview. But if it is a gaff, then it happened again:


      Anyway, I was sitting there, and my Chief of Staff -- well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with the plane, or -- anyway, I'm sitting there, listening to the briefing, and Andy Card came and said, "America is under attack."
      -- President Bush


      In his later quote he goes on to explicitly say it was the first building that was hit when he saw it. These quotes really stick in my mind when thinking about what happened. I hope they are just gaffs, but I still scratch my chin at it.
      --
      -no broken link
  121. why no banners? by mashy · · Score: 1


    What a better way to show our Americanism than by removing one of the things that distinguishes America: competitive commercial advertising

    OSDN should be shoving ads in our faces otherwise they're just contributing to a breakdown of American values.

  122. Thanks, Slashdot by yndrd · · Score: 1

    I was working in Washington at a U.S. Mint IT office near the Capitol when the towers were attacked. I didn't find out until the story on Slashdot appeared, and yours was the only site I could get to reliably. The phones were down, and this site was my only connection to what was going on. My superiors were totally clueless--many left without telling us we could go too, even.

    So thanks for posting the story. You really served me well that day (and many since).

  123. A few points... by bziman · · Score: 2

    First, thank you very much to Slashdot for being one of the few news sources last year that had the bandwidth to be useful during a crisis.

    Second, I wrote a rant earlier today that I think everyone should think about very carefully (though the slashdot crowd is less guilty than most):

    Today is September 11th (911 is a phone number people!). Remember last year? Osama bin Laden and his buddies destroyed the World Trade Center ("ground zero" is the technical term for the center of a large distructive event, such as a nuke or an earthquake, etc. It's not the name of a place.) and messed up the Pentagon pretty good. They killed what-- about 5,000 people? That really sucks. Does anyone know why? "They are crazy" is not a good answer. The tragedy is that all those people died, and most Americans completely missed the point.

    Third. Speaking of missing the point. Rather than trying to understand WHY people find it necessary to blow up our shit, the American people and their politicians are having a deplorable reaction. I won't repeat the lists of freedoms taken away, or the liberty/safety quotes. You all know the story by now.

    Fourth, if you want to make a difference, let your representatives in government know that your freedom is more important to you than anything else. Remember, us mp3 "pirates" could be considered terrorists before too long. I'm serious.

    Fifth, I'm not asking you to give up your SUV. But support alternatives to petroleum. Mention that to your representative. Petroleum products send a lot of money to people I'm really not interested in -- if we want to buy stuff from them it doesn't bother me... but with that money goes Western culture and ideals. That's why they want to blow up our shit. If someone told me I couldn't drink or date, I might start blowing up their shit. That doesn't make it right, but it's better to think of things in terms of cause and effect rather than effect and reaction.

    -brian

  124. Re:Puleeze! by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 1

    If you were in China, and you were speaking against the Chinese government, you'd be dead right now. Count your blessings. Cherish your rights.

  125. No Ads is a nice touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It shows that the corps that NEED ads to survive are the same corps that were hit, and the same corps which need US Gov. backing are the 'problem' that /bin/laden was(or is) bitching about.

  126. Neato-keen 9-11 computer project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I see those photos of the WTC burning and collapsing, I keep thinking that _someone_ out there ought to use those pics for a full-3d modelling of the event.

    Consider that there are probably thousands of photos of the event, taken practically every second from angles all around the city. It'd probably be a fascinating (but massive) exercise to take those photographs, maybe some video footage, and derive a three-dimensional, rotateable model from their aggregate. Users could play it at variable speeds, freeze particular moments, circle around the frozen smoke plumes, maybe even zoom in if the data was good enough-- sort of a 747-sized "bullet time."

    Okay, okay, it was tragic, horrible, we're a different nation now, we must never forget, etc., etc., but I'd love to see something like this.

    Brian Siano (brian@briansiano.com)

    1. Re:Neato-keen 9-11 computer project by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      ..already been done. I saw something some months back where a company took video footage and pictures and made a computer model out of it to determine exactly why the WTC fell. The impact blew the fire-resistant coating off of the gurders which allowed them to be exposed to open flame. Ultimately, the rivets popped and the trusses fell one by one.

      It was quite interesting. I think it was either on PBS or ABC, I don't recall which.

      Now, if you're talking about a full recreation of the events using computer modelling, that I've not seen and would be interested in seeing if such a thing exists.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  127. This must be posted as AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Turkish citizen, the country which runs the peace force at Afghanistan now and the only true muslim (as I am not) ally doesn't play games with USA, I have saw those in 1 year, I was called those:

    a) Towelhead
    b) Go back to your cave, what you do on our (site,chat etc)
    c) Nuke the mideast
    d) You stink

    Also protecting my rights and trying to tell the truth, I got banned in favour of americans.

    any many more. As I don't consider myself muslim, and tell about my habits like beer drinking, bars etc... I really started to wonder what a "real" muslim would feel.

    Bin Laden's plot was exactly that. To make people discriminated, to start a civilization war...

    He... Susceeded...

    RIP to 3000 people who died in WTC. RIP to millions of them if this evil plan works good (!). Don't forget, the suckers who crashed planes into WTC&Pentagon were uneducated ones, they were brainwashed to ignore the most powerful insict even, life. Why act like them?

    1. Re:This must be posted as AC by elefantstn · · Score: 2

      Don't let the fact that there are ignorant people all over the world, including the US, discourage you. The vast majority of Americans are tolerant, decent people. I have a friend who is a Turkish immigrant, and when one idiot tried to start shit with him in a bar, both my friends and complete strangers jumped to his defense. The most ignorant are also often the loudest -- don't let them drown out the majority.

      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    2. Re:This must be posted as AC by liberteus · · Score: 1
      Don't forget, the suckers who crashed planes into WTC&Pentagon were uneducated ones, they were brainwashed to ignore the most powerful insict even, life. Why act like them?
      No, they were educated. Atta was an architect. Many others used to drink alcohol and were also "westernized". They were not denied their chance in Germany, UK, and whereever they used to plot the death of thousands. Uneducated people could never have done this. Now you're making me wish that they had been denied the chance...
      --
      http://www.pageliberale.org
    3. Re:This must be posted as AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      First, I would like to apologize for the treatment you received on behalf of other Americans who did not react that way. I hope that you can realize that a lot of us were pretty pissed off (and still are). Unfortunately, nature tends to favor the easiest path and people are no exception. It is much easier to fall back to using racial slurs and stereotypes than trying to deal with people as individuals.

      I, personally, had a difficult time with the events of 9/11. I knew the pilot of Flight 11, the first plane to hit the North Tower of the WTC. When I saw his name on TV as one of the pilots of those aircraft, my heart sank. I felt... violated. Like some unseen hand reached into my life and stole something from me. It hurt and it was personal.

      On the other hand, my sister-in-law is Muslim. She and my brother got married in a mosque in NYC. She is a devout Muslim (as far as I know) and one of the sweetest and kindest people I've ever met. How could I hate someone like that? Simple: I can't. Those murderers who used our people as flying weapons to kill still more of our people were Muslim in name only. They were not Muslim in truth. I see it as the sham and facade that it really is.

      Osama bin Laden's plot was not to start a civilization war. It was to kill Americans, pure and simple. The reasons behind his declaration of jihad are irrelevant. What matters now is that al Quaeda is crushed, never to return.

    4. Re:This must be posted as AC by Jagasian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Obviously they weren't educated enough to know not to fly a plane into the WTC.

    5. Re:This must be posted as AC by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I can't speak for your experiences, but I can say here, in Portland, there was an outpooring to people who look mid-eastern, and an effort to ensure they weren't discriminated against.

      Are there peoiple who where? porobably, but there where far more of those that weren't.
      I think millions might be an overstatment.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  128. I'll never forget Slashdot on that day by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It sounds cheesy, but it's true. I lived in a small midwest city, and my friends and I were absolutely starved for news. I'll always remember coming to Slashdot and reading the first-hand accounts of the terror, the grief, the joy of finding out that a loved one was safe...

    My eyes are watering as I type this - it's coming back a little too clearly. I'll never forget that day, though, when I learned exactly how big our community is, and how close it can be.

    God bless all of you today. Hug someone today and tell them that you love them. Be with family. Live to post another day.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:I'll never forget Slashdot on that day by HLN · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's the same for me. I live in Sweden, so it's not as close to home, but virtually all the news sites on the web (including the good swedish ones) where down, and I remember coming to slashdot to read the first hand reports here.
      It really makes you think about the power of the net. I could read reports from people who actually was on location and saw what happened only minutes after it really happened.

      I especially remember some posts hopefully saying that it probably were cargo planes (and thus "minimizing" casualties), since a reported eyewitnes hadn't noticed any windows on the side of the air craft. Unfortunately it was just hopful "roumors"...

  129. 365 days later... by Slartibartfast · · Score: 0

    "We are all New Yorkers", was something I saw someone say after 9/11. While I was born in, raised near, and worked in NYC for several years, I moved away almost a decade ago. Nevertheless, those images will forever be blazoned into my memory -- and, no doubt, the memories of most everyone else, even those who'd never set foot on NY[C] soil. While I agree with what appears to be the gen'l consensus that this not be turned into a national holiday, it's clear it's because people want to remember the day -- like Pearl Harbor day -- but not, for lack of better words, pay tribute to it. All of us will always remember it, and I know, for me, 9/11 will always be a day of reflection and introspection.

    God bless, all...

  130. THIS GUY HAS SEX WITH TRAFFIC CONES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  131. Schedule of NYC Events by CritterNYC · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are a lot of events going on in New York City through Sunday to commemorate the attacks on 9/11. I have posted a schedule
    on the WorldTradeAftermath.com site.

    Best wishes to you and yours, today and throughout the week.

    Regards,
    John

  132. Walter Cronkite Agrees by north.coaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a quote from the transcript of the Larry King show on CNN:

    KING: Do you agree, though, with the all-day coverage? Every network seems to be doing...

    CRONKITE: No, I think we're going to get very weary, as tragic as are the stories, as heartrending as are the stories, as tear- jerking as are the stories, I think we're going to get very tired of hearing them over and over again over a period of two or three days or more. I think it's going to be overdone.

    I agree with Walter...

    /Don

    1. Re:Walter Cronkite Agrees by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      I've been weary of it for awhile. I was pissed that todays national coverage precluded me from receiving my normal traffic reports that would have saved me a full hour on my commute do to a fatality accident. I had to sit and listen to bagpipes and bells toll.

      The elementary school has stolen "Patriot Day" from April and stolen my son's excitement over his 7th birthday by force feeding him coverage, rememberances, and asking his scout den to do the schoolwide flag ceremony.

      Very weary indeed.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    2. Re:Walter Cronkite Agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cronkite hit it on the head.

      I mean come on, REALLY, this is just WAY TOO MUCH. Most countries MOVE ON. the fact that America *STILL* hasn't returned life to normal says that the terrorists have won. They have radically altered your life and along with it your enjoyment of life - that is what they aim to do.

      For god's sake, get some perspective. Yes, it was sad that all those people died but it was 2700 people, not 27,000 or 270,000 or 140,000 (such as America caused at Hiroshima). How many Americans have been killed by Americans since September 11? Probably damn close to 2700, if not more.

      America should take 9/11 for what it was... a wake-up call that your ignorant, self-righteous, bullying, contemptuous attitude toward the rest of the world will not be tolerated. It's not the same world it used to be - those people have a way of fighting back and they are quite obviously prepared to do it.

      GET OVER IT!!!! it's done... it happened, now move on. I am *SO* sick of this perpetual whining and crying over something that, in the grand scheme of things, is so small. How many Iraqi children are being born deformed because of the the spent Uranium the Yanks used in 1991? How many Palestinians have been killed by American-made weapons used by Israel? How many people have starved to death because of American economic sanctions? I think you got off DAMN lucky... it could have been MUCH, MUCH worse...

      Right now the Americans just look quite simply pathetic. London didn't whine and complain and cry looking for world-wide sympathy when it was flattened during the Blitz and a hell of a lot more than 2700 people died. People buried the dead, rebuilt the buildings and carried on with their lives. America needs to do the same before they look more pathetic than they already do.

    3. Re:Walter Cronkite Agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America should take 9/11 for what it was... a wake-up call that your ignorant, self-righteous, bullying, contemptuous attitude toward the rest of the world will not be tolerated. It's not the same world it used to be - those people have a way of fighting back and they are quite obviously prepared to do it.

      Oh, but you're so wrong. You see Osama and buddies could do what they do because they had a base of operations: Afghanistan. The Taliban thought that it would all blow over and they could declare some more holy wars. Imagine how surprized they were when the US immediately knew it was them, and came rolling in, very quickly and painlessly dispatching them. There's a message there that fucktards like you fail to grasp: Harbour or sponsor terrorists, and you will reap what you sow. If Osama's fuckheads, who are foolishly killing themselves (suicide missions are the bain of the idiotic) while Osama knowingly tried to keep himself alive (though he's probably dead now), launched an attack on New York today from Sudan, then GOODBYE MOTHERFUCKER SUDAN. This is war, and the US can crush any country in the world, and they have every right to.

      GET OVER IT!!!! it's done... it happened, now move on. I am *SO* sick of this perpetual whining and crying over something that, in the grand scheme of things, is so small.

      DON'T PAY ATTENTION YOU ASSHOLE COCKSUCKER! If I saw you in person right now, I'd punch you in the face. The US, and any Westerner who feels that this affected this, can do WHATEVER THE FUCK THEY WANT, and if it makes you jealous because your little fucking hut in Shithole Nowhereland was decimated by a shitflood when the local shitpile collapsed didn't get the same attention, too bad you jealous fucker. Fuck yourself asshole.

    4. Re:Walter Cronkite Agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like claiming that it's your penis' fault that you whack off so much: You don't have to watch TV, and you're welcome to go throw a frisbee in a park, or read a good book. If, however, you're trying to dictate what other people do then that perhaps misled: You can't declare your definition of "overdone" as the final word, when other people have completely different impressions.

      Let me put it another way: I have a friend who listens to the same radio station that I listen to, but she listens to it all day long as they play it in their radio. I only listen to it on the commute to and from work. She complains that they "repeat the same songs multiple times per day", but to me I only hear each song once, and it works out great.

    5. Re:Walter Cronkite Agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> CRONKITE: No, I think we're going to get very weary, as tragic as are the stories, as heartrending as are the stories, as tear- jerking as are the stories, I think we're going to get very tired of hearing them over and over again over a period of two or three days or more. I think it's going to be overdone.

      Hear, hear. I watched CNN for a couple of minutes this morning, and they showed a video by a documentory cameraman of the first plane hitting the WTC. Afterwards, Paula Zahn (the show host) commented that it was an image that we all wanted to forget! Excuse me, but then why are you going to show it 100 times today?!?

      I'm all for remembering those who died, for this was truly sad and unwarranted, and I feel for those who lost family members, friends and colleagues. However, how long will we dwell on the attack? It is time to move on.

    6. Re:Walter Cronkite Agrees by moertle · · Score: 1

      As with most things, moderation is the key.

      To come on and say, "in other news today marks the one year anniversary of the September 11th attacks that struck the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and now here's Katie with tomorrows commute...", would be too contrite.

      One day is fine, anything more is a bit much. And remember that not every action is an evil ploy to profit and exploit the tragedy.

      --
      I hold a patent on sigs...
  133. Re:Puleeze! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't take our freemdoms lightly, but it appears you take the death of 3000 other people very light..

    I would have to say that you are an extremely selfish person.. I can guarantee that if someone you truly cared about had been in that building you wouldn't have said:

    "The first thought that popped into my head was not about the horror of the event or even those who dies but rather a disturbed feeling that this is the start of a long erosion of everyone's rights."

  134. Here Is New York url fix by acomj · · Score: 2
    Its .org not .com...
    sorry about that



    here Is New York.org

  135. You forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny


    August 8, (1995) Windows 95 Release Date

  136. Re:Sad news - Stephen King, dead at 54 by lo_fye · · Score: 2, Funny

    I remember you posting this LAST YEAR! You, sir, have a very wierd SK Death Fetish.

    --
    geeks are cats who dig a certain kind of cool
  137. 1 year on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the rest of the world blind to Iraq!.
    Hello.... Iraq has enough chemicals to wipe the entire world out 3 times over.

    Why again do only the Brits and the Americans stand up and try and do something about stopping the Iraq madman dictator from setting off events which will wipe all of us out.

    If we dont stop him.. we get blamed... "should have killed him last time"

    If we do step in - we get blamed.

    The rest of the world are just sissies. Back up your words you cowards, else next time they will be bombing YOU.

    Hats off to the Yankies and the Brits and a big boohoo to those who want to sit by the side - just like some did during the second world war. whilst innocent Jews were being slaughted

  138. For what it's worth by SMQ · · Score: 2

    For what it's worth, I posted the following at work this morning:

    No, there's no American flag in my cubicle.

    It's not that I don't share your grief, your pain,
    even your lasting anger on this anniversary--I do.
    It's not that I don't love my country or appreciate
    all she offers--I do.

    There are few other places
    in all the world
    I feel I could enjoy living.

    But I've never felt that the best response to killing,
    however brutal and undeserved,
    is more killing,

    and I'm still naive enough to believe
    that God will show us another way,
    if only we stop hating long enough to listen,

    so I choose to express my dissent by not waiving the flag.

    And in a country where I've watched some of the things
    for which I love her most
    eroded,

    where it's accepted as a given that security and freedom
    are unavoidably opposed,
    where 69% of Americans believe the Freedom of Information Act
    should be sacrificed to protect our government,
    where 48%, almost a majority, believe the First Amendment
    goes too far in the freedoms it grants,
    and where those who have expressed unpopular opinions
    over the last year
    have been met with anger, fear, and hatred,
    "America, love it or leave it,"

    I choose not to pledge an allegiance I no longer feel.

    How can we be one nation, indivisible,
    when those of us who disagree are asked to depart?
    How can there be liberty and justice for all
    when American citizens, let alone foreign nationals,
    are held in military custody without trial, jury, or even counsel?

    I do love it; I won't leave it;
    but the sense of solidarity most Americans gained
    on that dreadful day a year ago
    still escapes me,

    and so I choose not to overtly participate in the commemoration,
    not out of any disrespect for those who died
    or those who survived--

    I grieve for them all more deeply than I can say--

    but out of respect
    for what I think we could become
    if only we tried a little harder
    or looked a little deeper.

    Shawn Menninga
    September 11, 2002

    --
    SMQ 90AE4B2BC4F6BEAF7340F0B40BA2DEF7340F6BC2D0392
    1. Re:For what it's worth by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good, but it's too bad all the happy, flowery stuff falls on deaf ears in the Mideast. Hey, if there was a peaceful way to stop it all, great.

      But, I think we all know as soon as a peaceful resolution is put in place, they'll take advantage of the situation again.

      Eye for an eye, building for a building, life for life.

    2. Re:For what it's worth by Valafar · · Score: 1

      Well, if you follow that philosophy we owe a few million lives to the rest of the world.

    3. Re:For what it's worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen the movie Ghandi?

      "An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind."

  139. I call you a troll by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    Your a troll at least post a to back up your argument

    like this one or this one that knock you down

    Lets see, the US has a mild terrorist? attach, some buildings collapsed because they where build on the cheap. and forget about the pentigon i might be a ligitimate millarty target.

    So the US kicked ten-tones out of shit agains a muslim country... the US has a worse track record than anyone else.

    I'm not shaving today, to remember the muslims that got killed

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:I call you a troll by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding me?

      Lets see, the US has a mild terrorist? attach, some buildings collapsed because they where build on the cheap.

      Are you serious in thinking that we should build our building strong enough to protect them from jetliners being flown into them? Terrorism really has affected you, my friend.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:I call you a troll by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      No I'm saying that building regulations should have been followed, the world trade centres were put up double quick and under budget, people tried to scrape the boat on the costs of putting up the world trade centres and paid the price later on.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  140. You have got to be kidding me by systemapex · · Score: 2

    Go to your library and read about IRA terrorist attacks on British soil and the subsequent responses from the super power. And that's only the first example that comes to mind.

  141. With all due respect by T1girl · · Score: 2

    It was an excellent call to present the log of Sept. 11, 2001 today so readers could recall not only what happened but how they came to know what was happening that day. But this would be a good time for Slashdot to re-think its policy on leaving the year off posts in its archive. As time goes by, the years blur together, and a 9/11/01 post becomes indistinguishable from 9/11/99 or 9/11/02.

  142. Not a day for polemics by WINSTANLEY · · Score: 1

    I could make all kinds of observations about how the relative merits of rhetoric of freedom vs one of democracy (i.e., freedom is fine and dandy but it is a notoriously slippery and sometimes regressive concept, that's why democracy is at the heart of my personal rhetoric about how things should be).

    I could make comments about how hard it is to be someone who is critical of the government yet support the defense of the country (really the defense of the American people, I don't care a whit for "the national interest") and trying to
    balance that against the death of innocent bystanders in sometimes necesary military action.

    All of those themes and many more could fill up
    many topics on Slashdot or elsewhere but the
    only thing I feel I want to talk about is my own
    sense of loss: I had dinner at Windows on The World during spring break my freshman year of college; I and my sister were actually in the WTC
    on the day of the '93 bombing; I worked in the financial district in NYC for 5 years; I interviewed for a job in the WTC. Though I didn't know anyone that was killed, those
    people seem very real to me, my neighbors, my co-workers... Part of my tangible, physical world and the fragile precious humanity therein was smashed out of existence on that Tuesday and even after a year I am not sure
    I understand the depth of its effect on me.

    Let's lift a glass to the blessings of healing and of life.

    --
    It is by coff... er, will, alone I set my mind in motion...
  143. One request by analog_line · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I won't ask that you put aside your political differences in this time of national mourning. I'm not.

    I won't ask that you give up your rights quietly because 9/11 shows that those rights will be our downfall if we continue to have them. I won't and I don't buy that.

    I won't ask that you give up fighting because 9/11 shows that nothing can be solved by war, and that only peace will succeed in making the world a safer place. Far better and more righteous people than I have tried to end war and have failed miserably.

    I won't ask you to rise up against the US government for its brutality and evil around the world that caused us to be attacked. Every other nation is just as evil, and has just as horrifying skeletons in their closet. America is just happening now. No amount of wrong done excuses what the hijackers, and those who helped plan and fund the hijacking did.

    I won't ask you to condemn or absolve Muslims as a group for the actions and beliefs of some that called themselves Muslim.

    I won't try to convince you that the lives of those murdered were in any way more or less important than the lives of Israelis killed in suicide bombings, the lives of Palestinians killed by Israeli solders and civillians, the lives of Vietnamese women and children murdered by American soldiers at the Mi Lai Massacre, those that died when nuclear weapons were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, those that died at the Battle of Pearl Harbor, or any other life lost. They aren't. A life is a life, whomever's it is.

    All I ask is that you remember the dead. In the end, that's the best any of us can hope for after we die in this world. No amount of war or peace will bring them back to life. Whatever existence is or isn't waiting after life ends, memory is all that is left of the person in this world. Remember the dead, and be glad you are alive, because it could have been you on those planes, in the World Trade Towers, or the Pentagon. Remember the families and friends and their loss, because it could have been your friend, or brother, or sister, or mother, or father who died that day. Remember their loss and throw a party, and hang out, get drunk, play touch football, talk until the wee hours, play video games, watch movies, argue, or whatever you enjoy doing with them, because most of us will die before we're tired of this life.

    In the end, what you do and what you believe doesn't matter to me, and I expect you feel the same about me. Just remember for those people, that went out of this life in a way few of us would choose to, and don't forget that we're all lucky to be alive.

    That's it, I guess...

  144. My feeling for the victims... But... by willmurat · · Score: 1

    I have sincere feelings for the victims and victims' families, but I can't stop thinking about how dumb is US Government in Foreign Politics. I wonder if G.W. Bush ask yourself "why are we suffering this?" or "what are our mistakes anyway?"

    Sincerelly, extremes acts like these make us very sensitive and feared. That's normal. But I think it's time to think what we can do to stop things like that to happen.

    Massacrate Afghanistan? This won't work...
    Bombing Iraq? This won't work...
    Discriminate people of "third world"? This won't work...
    Don't help palestinians in your rights to a land? This won't work...

    And all that is happening at this moment. Why so many people hate U.S.? Guys, this is not envy... This is not because north-americans have more money... This is not because U.S. call yourself "Land of Freedom"... This is not without reason... Think about it! Think about what your gorvernment is doing right now about foreign politics and maybe you can realize the hate this government is seeding all over the world. This is a crime against all north-americans! This is a crime against the free world!

    So many legal elected gorvenments fall down because CIA action in third world...
    So many people just die starving because U.S. commercial politics...
    So many countries are humiliated because agressive actions of U.S. ...

    Once again: I have sincere feelings for the victims... But it's time to change the U.S. mind for things like 9/11 doesn't happen in the future. U.S. government have this debt with your citizens.

    1. Re:My feeling for the victims... But... by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      Your post is full of irrational rants and is obviously inspired by propaganda. The problem with being the only world superpower is that nobody will be happy with your actions. If we don't help the people of [insert third world nation here], we are selfish. If we do help, we are meddling, and acting as the world police.

      9/11 is NO FAULT of our own. It sickens me that you are trying to blame our country for what happened. What happened happened because there are evil people in this world, who are driven by evil motivations. What you suggest is understanding evil. I wonder if you would have suggested during WWII that we try to understand and relate to Hitler.

      The real problem is people like you. You think that a terror attack is the way to change attitudes and policy. Your attitude is disgusting!

    2. Re:My feeling for the victims... But... by willmurat · · Score: 1

      No... You missed the problem again... I don't wanna your help or your country help. I don't blame U.S. bacause of what happen. It was an absurd act of insanity. But don't you realize why things like that happened? We can't justify what happened, but we MUST try to understand! But if you just stand in your position and don't change a bit you just miss the opportunity to walk in another direction and make this world a peacefull place.

    3. Re:My feeling for the victims... But... by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Sure. Any historian will tell you that a significant number of people treat Islam as, essentially, a militant religion that rewards fighting the infidel -- and, in particular, martyrdom. If you wish to know more, just watch al-Jazeera interview young children (say, 10 years and younger) on their views about martyrdom, suicide bombers and whether or not they go to Paradise immediately. This philosophy does not exactly lend itself to coexistence with any other philosophy, because of its desire to kill all opposition. And no, the peaceful Muslims (vast bulk) don't matter unless they actually /do/ something about their more violent neighbors (such as opposing the mullahs involved), because otherwise, at best, they're neutral.

      Incidentally, it has been suggested that the UK was also a target, but that the aircraft selected were grounded before the hijackers could board. Apparently, the plotters did not synchronize times to maximize surprise. Keep in mind, also, that Islamic terrorists have attacked or threatened attacks all over the world, including their own backyard, such as the Luxor Temple attacks and the insurgency against Sadat (and, after his assassination, Mubarak). Egypt, Pakistan, Lebanon, Algeria, France, Indonesia, Russia, Israel... have all been targeted by radical Islamists as well.

      So there's your reason.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  145. Things that I hate about it. by keymygrip · · Score: 1

    There are several things that this anniversary reminds me what I hate about things here in the US.

    1. Media pandering and dirty laundry abounds. Don't try to tell me how to feel about what is going on. I can do that for myself and it is insulting when you do.

    2. The way American treats other countries and people because we are "always right." Those "right" actions being very wrong and American civilians dying for that. How about we actually try to be right. I think it can come down to a quality model. Doing it right up front will save untold expenses at the end. Instead we pay those untold expenses for what was done wrong in the past.

    3. Future attacks. I almost expected to hear about something horrible when I woke up this morning. I fear more lives will be lost here on our soil because those who "represent" us are willing to kill regular people on their soil. We fight fire with fire and it makes more fire. On the other hand, it is hard to attack someone that cares about you. Why not invest in their people. Show them that we care by being there to back up our investment. So many times we help people and leave just so they can be punished for getting US aid. This goes back to actually "being right" and not just saying we are.

    4. Loss of rights. I am not going to get Franklin's quote correct but those who are willing to give up freedom for security deserve niether. It sucks when we get attacked, but that does not mean that those responsible for the hatred towards us should get to call all the shots. I know they mean well, but until they get some follow through and start truly caring past our own borders, other countries will, understandably, dislike us.

    I hope this will never happen again. It is nonsensicle for those that have died to have died. But I don't see how what we are doing now will prevent it. We are not an impenitrable box, we are a land of immigration of all sorts. That kind of land cannot be protected from subversives. You have to quash the reason for subversive activity to protect it.

  146. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a joke, right? If not, it is only an attitude that can survive when you are cloistered in a militarily powerful country with a strong police force. Guess what a military and police are? The threat of implied violence
    The purpose of them is to put on a show of force so that those who would commit these acts know that we have the power and are willing to use it. Unfortionatly there are those that would beleive that the threat is not a real one and that there would be no retaliation. They are of course proven wrong.

  147. Thoughts by Kaypro · · Score: 2
    Taken from my website.


    If you're reading this, chances are you're busy hacking away on your *nix workstation. I ask you to take a brief moment and step away from the cyber world, look outside and remember the tragedies that took place only one year ago. Never before in my lifetime have I witnessed an event that affected the entire planet in the way that 9-11 has. It doesn't matter what country you reside in or what your nationality is, most will remember the precise moment they first were made aware of what happened that tragic day. Our day to day struggles seem so small all of a sudden as we realize just how lucky we are to be living a life the way we choose to. History has shown just how precious freedom is and it is something we should never take for granted. No doubt life after 9-11 has changed but at the same time we should not let those few soulless beings who try to take our freedom away from us and then have the audacity to justify their horrific actions in the name of their own warped sense of religion, change the way we choose to lead our lives. In the grand scheme of things, our existence is a mere blip on the radar screen of the reality we live in, be sure that blip counts for something.

    Peace

  148. At least... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He didn't become a pot smoking (but not inhaling), draft dodging rapist who organized pro-communist teach-ins from the safety of Oxford.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:At least... by Microsift · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure we should praise him for choosing cocaine and alcohol over pot. Granted, since he won't give an answer on his past drug use (Clinton at least gave an answer), his alleged cocaine habit is just an undenied rumor. His record as a drinker is a matter of public record, since on at least one occasion he drank and then drove while still intoxicated.

      He used his father's political connections to avoid going to Vietnam, if that's not draft dodging, I don't know what is.

      Rapist?

      I find the phrase "the saftey of Oxford" troubling for some reason. You seem to imply that organizing pro-communist teach-ins would be dangerous in America. What does that say about our freedom?

      --
      My other sig is extremely clever...
    2. Re:At least... by baskil · · Score: 1
      No, but he did become a cocaine snorting, AWOL soldier who:

      later liked to drive recklessly, http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/ Bush_Arrest001102.html

      may have had his millitary records destroyed, http://www.talion.com/georgebush.html

      and mismanaged any venture he ever entered, even the administrative branch in Texas http://www.tompaine.com/feature.cfm/ID/3806

  149. Dark Day by LooneyScotsman · · Score: 1

    On this day of rememberance, i offer my brothers and sisters in America my prayers and my sympathy, and only wish i could do more. I just wanted you all to know that you are not alone on the aniversary of a very dark day. All of London, at 1:46 GMT, united in silence to remember the lives lost. I can only pray that one day no person should have to live in fear of terrorist attacks, and that the memories of one year ago can strengthen the bonds of our nations. I love you all

    --
    "Ask a stupid person, get a stupid answer"
  150. I remember it as if it were yesterday by cecil36 · · Score: 2

    I thought 9/11/01 was going to be a typical day for me at the time. I was a recent college graduate with a CS degree and no job. Employers were turning me down because the jobs I was applying for require either experience or additional knowledge beyond a college degree (i.e. certification).

    I started out the morning, leaving my house right around the time the first plane hit the WTC. When I arrived at one company that I was going to interview with that day, I learned from the receptionist that the WTC was hit. I didn't believe her at first. After wrapping up the interview (I didn't get the job because they were looking for a VBasic programmer, and I had little knowledge of VB), I asked for directions to the nearest public library. I then drove over there, tried to get into every major news site, and could only get into Slasdot. After viewing the headlines on /., I learned that the receptionist wasn't making up stuff about the WTC and Pentagon. It was right around this time that Cleveland mayor Michael White announced a press conference, announcing what the City of Cleveland would be doing to keep its citizens safe (some of you may recall that United Flight 93 was in Cleveland airspace and turned around in the Cleveland area before crashing in PA). I knew that I wouldn't be able to continue my job search until this whole mess straightens itself out. While driving home, I had to make a couple more stops. One of which was to the Mentor Chamber of Commerce office. After leaving the Chamber office, I walked past another office where the receptionist had a TV going with a broadcast of CNN. I decided to stop in and watched the disaster for about 30 minutes before departing for home. Only thing I could think of was that with airplanes grounded, they better be airborne very soon, because I had a business trip to go on later in the month.

    In the back of my mind, I was wondering if the FAA would take George Carlin a little more seriously. On one of his comedy specials, Carlin did a routine on airport security, and he specifically mentioned passengers being allowed to take knives on board a plane. Anyone hear if the FAA also banned glass bottles and knitting needles as well?

  151. Dick Cheney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it when all the other leaders are out in force Dick Cheney is always hiding in a bunker somewhere? Remember shortly after S11 he was hiding for months, why??

    1. Re:Dick Cheney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      naa, it was a cover up to get a heart transplant on the quiet...

    2. Re:Dick Cheney by sammaffei · · Score: 1

      I mean if G.W. or Rumsfeld get axed we could still survive... But if Cheney bites it, man we're in trouble. Listen to the man for 5 minutes. It's obvious that he's the brains behind the whole show.

      --

      Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.

    3. Re:Dick Cheney by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

      Harhar, thats exactly my thoughts too. He is pushing the war on iraq and it's freakin obvious. I'm not a paranoid conspiracy theorist but I recently found this page http://www.hermes-press.com/impintro.htm ... read the part about Dick Cheney and his natural resources company Haliburton, pretty scary.. I just hope that one would not take an entire country to war and possibly put an entire region in dissarray for a self centred benefit of a couple of ppl in the natural resources business.

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
  152. you forgot one by cosmol · · Score: 1

    I don't believe pbs is running any commercials either ;)

  153. Never Forget, But Never Show Weakness by PipianJ · · Score: 1

    You would rather show them weakness?

    I would rather show them strength, by sticking together, moving on with our lives, REMEMBERING SILENTLY, but moving on. Let us show the perpetrators of this act as well as those that want to do more than that to us that we are strong, and that we will not be cowed by such events. Let us show them that we do not have any intention of saying "Aw, it's alright. Let's be friends." The crime must be paid in full. Not forgotten.

    By not punishing those who masterminded the crime, would you not be helping to FORGET that they did it? Would yo not begin to forget that it ever happened? Let us NOT forget, and let us punish them for their actions.

    1. Re:Never Forget, But Never Show Weakness by Lysol · · Score: 1

      Not retaliating and not punishing is weakness?? Wow, and we have the ability to reason because why?

      Hmmm, and, throughout history, what would you say to all the Vietnemese families, American-Japanese interned in WWII, Phillipino families during the Teddy Roosevelt Gunboat diplomacy years, Central American families during the Regan era (ugh, god.., i shiver at the thought), relatives of all the dictators we supported throught the 20th century who saw the ends of so many others? (I won't even begin to go into US corporate exploitation of world peoples and resources)

      What about the Palestinian families who have lost ones from an American bullet from a Israeli soldier? What would you say to an Israeli mother who lost a son or daughter soldier to a Palestinian bomber? (both completely horrific)

      Who pays then? Losing someone is undescribable. But does making those pay really make them pay? What about their sons or daughters? You haven't changed their minds. And thusly, up rises the next generation and the cycle continues.
      Sure, make them pay, but solve the problem too! Or, you'll be making more pay later. And more families will suffer. And we'll be at war again.

      When you were little, did your parents tell you to keep trying to kick Jonny's ass down the street? Or did they tell you to make up and be friends? And were you not almost best friends later on?

      One of the only things that still brings me comfort in our sorry state of world affairs is my diverse group of friends. The world is a different place when you have other viewpoints to discuss with and learn from. American culture is not the only and nor is it the best. Sigh. But sadly, we still haven't learned a year later and unfortunately, now we know others pain..

  154. Re:Puleeze! by DohDamit · · Score: 0, Troll

    Insightful? Perhaps to yet another teenager...

    Unless you're a sociopath with an obsession for civil rights(a highly unlikely combination at best), you are completely full of shit. The idea that the first thought that popped into your head was something not related to fire and death is completely incredulous.

  155. One year after?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could be argued that as today is Sept 11 that it is not one year after Sept 11.

  156. Heed your own advice by Scaremongerzero · · Score: 1

    Wake up before it's too late.

    1. Re:Heed your own advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you should open your eyes some of these people have shown nothing but hate for americans and are quite happy when americans die & celebrate in the streets...and you wonder who the monsters are

  157. Does anyone feel like finding out more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NYTimes -(among others, I'm sure) http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/10/national/10PLOT. html registration required - posted a pretty lengthy summary of all the details the intelligence community managed to piece together AFTER the attack about events leading up to the attack. Meanwhile, some say (www.debka.com) the FBI is at a loss to figure out how the Al-Qaeda operatives communicate, although they're sure it's via some sort of "secret" email.

    Any ideas how they're communicating?

  158. Indoctrination. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2

    That wasn't an explanation. That was an knee-jerk accusation masquerading as wisdom.

    Go back to your Chmosky.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  159. Banner Ads - Why? by jarran · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why exactly have OSDN turned off banner ads? What does it achieve? To me it just seems like OSDN a good way for companies to point out to everyone how caring and symapathetic they are. I.e., not running ads is just a form of self-advertising.

  160. I heard the news today, oh boy, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ten thousand holes in blackburn lancashire...

  161. Sorry ass, 2nd rate country that initiated war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You shouldn't have started something that you couldn't finish (if you don't like getting randomly blown up). The US is a Saudi *ally*. We were attacked by people we've helped over and over through the years. You've never done a damn thing for the Irish but rape and pillage and it didn't stop in the early 20th century, but continues today. There's no comparison.

    1. Re:Sorry ass, 2nd rate country that initiated war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buying oil from them is not "helping them over and over". If anything you're supporting their oppressive government.

    2. Re:Sorry ass, 2nd rate country that initiated war by dr3vil · · Score: 1

      Rape and pillage? I think the original poster was British, not a Viking. Although, of course, large numbers of the population of the British Isles are descended from Vikings, not least because of their raping and pillaging. It all gets very confusing...

  162. (adolf hitroll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're my Idol, no doubt you mentally induced me in doing this for you :-)

    BTW, has somebody a link to the bullshit JonKatz posted sometime after the 11 sept ?

    I mean the one in which he said he fell on his knees (probably to blow some fireman, unlike what he mourns about) ?

    Definitely a typical sample of his opportunism.

  163. well... by InsaneCreator · · Score: 2

    I'm looking at the whole thing a bit differently:

    1 year ago, a group of people showed the whole world, that nothing is impossible...

  164. I cant wait to reap the $$$$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that this will generate from the oil deposits that we'll get our hands on.
    George Dubuya has done a great jorb, the defence industry has been saved, along with the ecconomy, the oil industry is about to get one-hell-of-a shot in the arm from taking over Afganistan and Iraq esuring that we all get to go about our god-given American way of life.
    Now if we could only produce the evidence that Alkieda (sp?) or whoever was responsible for the WTC thingie, AS WAS PROMISED, i'll sleep a bit better at nite.

  165. just what we need, a flashback to a flamewar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. I miss a bunch of neanderthals armed with misinformation flaming the shit out of eachother over israel, clinton, W, etc.

  166. Halifax Explosion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thursday, December 6, 1917

    http://www.region.halifax.ns.ca/community/explod e. html

    the biggest man-made explosion before the nuclear age

    Over 1,900 people were killed immediately; within a year the figure had climbed well over 2,000. Around 9,000 more were injured, many permanently; 325 acres, almost all of north-end Halifax, were destroyed.

  167. Sorry, but you're insane. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2

    To your first paragraph: there's a lot of "Hate America First" liberal academics doing just what you claim to be afraid of doing.

    To your second paragrsph: America may have made mistakes, but America has done more to improve the world than any other country in history. Bar none. What's actually happening is that foreign kleptocracies pump out anti-Amrican propaganda to keep their masses distracted. Apparently, more suggestible Americans are also susceptible.

    To your third paragraph: I'm well-informed.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  168. Re:Rock Saddam Hussein's Ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most appropriate wesley wills song :D

  169. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And copy it under every other post like that.

  170. Waking the sleeping giant by dpilot · · Score: 2

    Last time the "sleeping giant" was wakened was WWII, and we came out and did the Right Thing, during and shortly after. Non-punitive postwar policies in both Europe and the Far East were some of our finest moments.

    After the Cold War, the US sort of began dozing off, again. We still had our fingers in other pies, but the level of engagement was lowering. At times it looked like the world was going to do quite happily without *any* superpowers, eventually.

    On 9/11, I knew that the sleeping giant was awakened, again. But this time I had an ugly feeling that the sleeper was going to be *very* grumpy, and not so 'polite' as last time. This seems to be happening, unfortunately. Part of the Al Qaida purpose was to drive a wedge between the West and the Moslem world. Especially with the recent Iraq noise, we seem to be playing into their hands, giving them greater success by driving a wedge between the US and the rest of the world, not just the Moslems.

    IMHO there is a key distinction to be made here about fundamentalist Moslem terrorists: They don't believe in modern society. They share beliefs with a Moslem subset that would like to see the world taken back to the year AD 700, when the Prophet lived. Think Afghanistan during Taliban rule, except that during the times of the Prophet, society was much more enlightened with respect to women. Generally in a war, you have two societies fighting for dominance, with the implicit assumption that one society will force its will on the other, but that both will remain essentially intact, one changed. The current War on Terror is different, because Al Qaida's objective is not to change our society but to eliminate it. They currently participate in modern society, in order to remove it in favor of their Utopian vision of the times of the Prophet. (Though again it's a vision that may not truly square with the reality back then.)

    It's noteworthy that as naughty as he may be, Saddam Hussain heads a nation, and it acts like a nation. Perhaps a naughty nation, but still a nation. That's fundamentally different from Al Qaida. I guess they'd really like to destroy the society and nation of Israel, and that's not good, but that's a far cry from rejection/destruction of modern society.

    IMHO the greatest problem facing the world today is overpopulation and its attendant resource/environmental effects. The greatest factor in dropping the birthrate around the world is the education and empowerment of women. Moslem fundamentalism is a grave danger to the entire world, precisely in its disempowerment of women. The US is not blameless here, with its blind-spot on "reproductive issues" in foreign policy, but at least we don't advocate burkasn.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Waking the sleeping giant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't sleeping giant imply that the giant is sleeping. With the biggest military in the word you havn't been sleeping for decades. This is just the hornet stinging after you put your hand in it's nest for it's honey (oil).

  171. Re:One Year On: What has America Learnt? by mtrupe · · Score: 1

    What can America do? Its an extreme religious problem. They are indocrinated to hate our freedom, our capitalism, and our way of life. All we can do is fight them. We cannot do anything to change their attitude. Should we give up our way of life to be more like them? I am afraid some people would say yes.

    We could force women to cover their faces, have a government enforced religion (Muslim)? We can't bow to their demands... We must eliminate these extremists.

  172. Dr. Seuss WTC poem by u8nogard · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I do believe if he was still around today, this is what he would say. The first time that I read it (one year ago), it brought a tear to the eye.

  173. Yes, In the Texas Air National Guard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was an 18 month average wait to get in, but he joined within two months (senator dad had someone pull strings?). He went AWOL too.

    The only pols I know of who served in 'Nam were Gore, Harkin, and Kerry.

    1. Re:Yes, In the Texas Air National Guard by mgessner · · Score: 1

      McCain (RM-AZ) was a POW in Vietnam.

      --
      "Sometimes the truth is stupid." - Lawrence, creator of Prime Intellect
  174. Agree, But it Depends on the coverage by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    Anyone else feel that it is wrong for the media to cover this story so in depth, and ultimately make money on those that died and their families. I have decided not to watch any coverage. I remember very well what happened.

    I've been watching less and less television as they day approaches, but have caught some of the coverage despite that. Partly because I know someone who died, and partly because I am sick to death of our wallowing in self pity. Some of the coverage has been quite tasteful (though distasteful to me personally simply because the quantity of coverage is too much), while other coverage (Fox, for example) has been positively disgusting. Then there was the "let's relive the moment" crap (I don't recall the channel, as I switched rather quickly), a blow by blow retelling of events, as if going through the trauma wasn't bad enough the first time.

    PBS (Frontline, McNeal-Lehrer, etc.) in contrast has been very tasteful (though it is all still too goddamn much, which makes even the most tasteful coverage distasteful. A week lead in for crying out loud!?! Give me a f*cking break).

    That having been said, I think it should be pointed out that over 50,000 people have died in car accidents in the United States in the last year. The damage done by the subhuman Al Q'aida vermin, in terms of human losses, was relatively modest (though no less tragic for that). Most of the impact was architectural (a few missing buildings) and pyschological (the horror). The latter we have in no small part the media to thank for (the events were bad enough, but that didn't seem to slow them down any in hyping even that, something they haven't stopped doing over the last year), which I think is one of the most despicable aspects, outside of the despicable act itself, to this whole affair.

    Then there is Ashcroft's and the FBI's blatent power grab in the wake of the tragedy, which was almost inhuman (subhuman? certainly inhumane) in its cynical manipulation of the events.

    So while the coverage is annoying, the lack of perspective (3k dead v. 50k dead on our highways, etc.) and its resulting fear (you're not afraid of your car, are you?), the ongoing media hype, the unprecedented power grab by the executive branch of the federal government and resultant shredding of most of our constitution are far more disgusting, and the consiquences of that particular form of collective stupidity is something we are likely to live with for a generation or more.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  175. A Submariner's View of September 11th, 2001 by eduardo · · Score: 1

    I was underway on the ballistic missile submarine USS LOUISIANA (SSBN 743)(G) when the terrorist attacks on the USA occurred.

    As you probably guessed, we can't get TV underwater. We can, however, receive radio broadcasts. Our radiomen were actually able to tune in to WFAN-AM radio from NYC. They piped the broadcast into the crew's mess (where we eat).

    We didn't get any visual feedback of the attacks until about a month later when we finally received some mail. Thoughtfully, someone sent a VHS tape of a KNBC broadcast from September 11, 2001. Knowing what had already happened made it very difficult to finally absorb the visual aspect of the terrorist attacks.

    I don't keep a journal or diary, but I did make a record of the events of that attack. You can check it out here:

    A Submariner's 9/11

    This was September 11th, from my point of view.

  176. My heart goes out to the families by mustangsal · · Score: 1

    My neighbor was a flight attendent on flight 93 that day. She was the sweetest lady. When I was a kid, she flew the hawaii route, and every week when she'd come home she'd bring me bags and bags of nuts.

    Although she never had any kids of her own, we, the neighborhood kids were hers.

    I'll miss her...

    --
    1+2+1+1 || 1+2+2+1
  177. Not really by danrik · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is the right thing to do, though. Over the past few days, on TV and elsewhere, I have seen many "tributes" to the people who died on that day. TV shows commemorating the heroism of the New York emergency personell, the heroism of the people on the flight that did not crash into a building, etc. I even "half watched" a cople of these, mostly because I was too lazy to quit coding long enough to find a remote to change the channel. On every single one of these specials, I saw something that made me lose all respect for what they were trying to do: Commercials. If you think about it for a moment, TV stations are still charging for that advertising, and since they know that a sentimental American public will be watching those advertisements, I would imagine that they are charging a boatload more for that airtime. At that point, to me at least, these specials become less about "honoring the dead" and "remembering the tragedy" than they are about shameless and blatant corporate profiteering off of a tragedy. This simple action has placed Slashdot and OSDN a cut above the rest in my eyes, and I salute their action. /-Dan

    1. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I find it very irritating that the "wtc" incident takes up all the TV airtime... even on Norwegian channels. I'm sorry, but I think the Americans only reaped what they "sow." Of course, it is a tragedy when human life is lost. I feel for the families and friends that has lost their loved ones. But USA must pipe their god damn voice down. I feel that the Americans has a tendency to play a little too much World Police. If an airplane crashed into a building in eastern Tokyo, it would maybe be on the evening news. But when it is America, it is a historical marking, and the whole world "MUST" respect USA, and join them in their "war". Ok ok. Terrorism is bad, so on and so forth, but the Americans has a tendecy to blow it waaay out of porportions. [ Sorry for my poor english :]

    2. Re:Not really by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      You'd be right if it was a single plane making a wrong turn into a single building I suppose. But this was four planes intentionally piloted by henchman of a madman who declared war on the US and her allies (Norway is a US ally isn't it?).

      Much of sowing that the US has done was during a global chessmatch between the East and the West called the Cold War in which both sides used third world countries as pawns. The prize was the disintegration of the Soviet block and a unified democratic Europe.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    3. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be worse. I live in Northern Ireland. Least your President and congress have the balls to do something about it. I have had to put up with nearly being blown to atoms on several occasions and shot at, because the British government would rather wage war on Iraq then on the terrorists in our country.

      More power to Bush and his government. I'd love them to come clean up Tony Blair's mess so that the people of Northern Ireland can live free of this Terrorist threat. Fuck the UK government, Fuck them up their stupid asses.

    4. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No chance. There isn't any oil in Northern Ireland.

    5. Re:Not really by someguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was watching the History channel and was very happy that, even though the program was paced for commercials, they did not show any. Instead the breaks consisted of interviews with NY firefighters.
      If anybody is reading this and wants something that isn't sensational that deals with 9/11/01, try the History Channel

      --
      A planet where apes evolved from men? Long live the apes.
    6. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes we reap what we sow. We planted the seeds for the first successful Democratic Republic and now we reap the benifits of being the most powerful nation in the world. As an American I find your opinion virtually worthless. There is nothing that Norway has ever done, or will do that will effect the world as a whole so what do you or anyone one in your country know about it?
      As a matter of fact, without the U.S. consumers, Norwegians would still be howling at the moon and living in little huts, huddling together with their livestock for warmth in the winter.
      Also, if it were not for us your little piss ant country, and the rest of europe would either be ruled by the Germans or Russians.
      As far as the U.S. playing the "World Police" you are absolutely right. That is, however, because we have to. If you look into it you'll find that over 90% of any UN ground force is from America. Do you think Britian and France could have stopped Sadam back in the 90's? Absolutely not. And where was Norway during that entire fiasco? In Norway, thats where. You can sit back in your tiny country, with your tiny army, and dependant economy and say whatever you like. No one will listen to you because you have never had your balls on the line. Ever.
      And if an airplane crashed into Eastern Tokyo, we wouldn't HAVE to help them, because Japan is a fairly self sufficient country. If an airplane crashed into some building in Norway, we WOULD HAVE to help you, because you would all be sitting around putting mayonase on french fries and looking at all the hot, blond Norwegian chicks in OUR magazines.

    7. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just hit the real truth right on the head. Soon there wont be any British control in NI as well as the UK government is making steps to hand us over to the Irish Government. Oh well, Time to move my ass to Scotland. Its like NI only not shit :)

    8. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Bush wants to help, all he has to do is STOP AMERICANS SENDING MONEY + GUNS TO THE IRA. Crush NORAID. Crush NIFC. That's how you fix the Irish problem.

    9. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The groups associated with the attacks said they didn't have any problem with American people only the government (including the capitalist bodies in the US)"

      Are you a moron? Osama Bin Laden at first called for all of his followers to openly kill all American soldiers (i think he's said this since 96). Then in 98 called on all of his followers to KILL ALL AMERICANS. Not just soldiers. I can't believe that people are trying to justify what happened sept 11.

    10. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That will never happen, we'll have to kill all 280 million Americans, time to visit some ex-Soviet scientists and get the formulas for some of their best chemical weapons

    11. Re:Not really by wiretrip · · Score: 1

      Now now, play nicely! Of course the attacks on the WTC were terrorist attacks, and hideously evil ones at that! - But I live in Manchester, where an IRA bomb could have killed many more people than died in the WTC attacks. So put it into persoective - especially since the US funds the IRA!!! There is NO SUCH THING as a self sufficient country - the USA certainly isn't. In fact, if it didn't depend on the oil in the Gulf, there would never have been any attempt to sort out Saddam (two d's) - incidentally it is also questionable as to whether or not Kuwait was actually a legitimate independent state (it was historically part of Iraq in the first place). Secondly - Norway has always been a diplomatic hub in many UN accords - the Oslo agreement anyone? - so you are completely wrong! Thirdy - The US is the only state EVER to have used Weapons of Mass Destruction in the history of the planet - so I find it find it grossly hypocritical that George W ('nepotistically' rather than 'democratically' elected) is trying to hijack (pun intended) the grieving process in order to rally support for Cheney and Rumsfeld's new obsession. Fourthly - a minute's silence for: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The vistims of 11 Sept 1973 ...the date on which a CIA-sponsored coup in Chile overthrew the democratically elected government of Allende, leading to an estimated 30,000 political killings. I thank you.

  178. You put your hands in a hornets nest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then your going to get stung

  179. Who's eyes? by Scaremongerzero · · Score: 1

    My eyes have yet to see anyone celebrating the death of Americans in the streets. I doubt your eyes have either. The media lense is not your eye, nor should you trust it to be. I reiterate, and quote you again - "Wake up before it's too late."

  180. a year later by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2

    I still feel the same emotions, albeit quite a bit lessened. Not anger, not rage, not fear, not terror. Just sadness for the people who died. That is all. A year ago, I was openly crying in front of a TV in the office lobby. This morning, my wife and I just watched the ceremonies, and again just feel plain sad for the families. That's it. Still no anger, no fear, just sadness.

    And the people who want to drive me into some kind of jingoist frenzy can forget it. The list of names included a "Hussein", several "Changs" and a number of "Garcias". The only thing that united them was being in the wrong place at the wrong time. And woe be to the politicians who wage revenge in my name, because I don't want revenge. I want peace.

    It's time to stop allowing the Iraqi people to starve and die from malnutrition and treatable disease, simply because we don't like their dictator. I don't remember reading many sagas of human rights violations in Iraq prior to the Gulf War. But in any case, whomever is right, whomever is wrong, we need to get those innocent people some food and medicine, instead of keeping it from them.

    If we want to punish Saddam for whatever reason, send in the snipers and get it over with. All we are doing now is starving, and by inaction murdering, the Iraqi people. I'm sure Saddam has food, wine, and medicine, regardless of what the US does. In any case waging another war in the area in the name of "revenge" for Sep-11 is a farce. The Taliban was a truly evil regime, stoning women to death for not wearing the correct clothing, or for being raped. Where are the tales of Iraqi atrocities, other than the invasion of Kuwait?

    Ah, yes, the Kurds. Indeed, Saddam is a genocidal terrorist. So why isn't the rest of the world gearing up to be alongside the US? No answers.

    And Palestinians are a terrorized people, just as much as the Israeli people are terrorized. That's just a bad, bad situation. The only solution is a permanent, enforced Palestinian state. Just give them the West Bank and/or Gaza Strip and be DONE with it. Neither side is right, no matter what either side will tell you.

    Damn, I started ranting. Ridiculous thing to do, when what we should be doing is simply remembering the lives that were lost on Sep-11 and get on with ours.

    But one final word: the embargo on Iraq is being carried out in our names, by our power. Thus each and every one of us is responsible for the deaths of thousands of children. Saying, "but I'm just a citizen" is no excuse.

    Elections are in November. Find candidates who are against the embargo and elect them. If everyone convinced 2 people who didn't vote last term, and convince them to vote this term, the entire face of politics would be changed over night.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:a year later by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the Shiites in the south, either. Saddam, if memory serves, as well as much of his government, is a Sunni Muslim and probably a not particularly fundamentalist one at that. The Shiites haven't been treated too well by Baghdad, which isn't surprising given their attempts at rebellion.

      As for other countries:

      The Russian oil company Lukoil has a major
      contract with Iraq -- for when the sanctions are lifted. It would not surprise me if Gazprom also has a serious interest there; it is already in the region via Iran. Russian-Iraqi trade is possibly up to $4B/year; Lukoil would like the sanctions to drop so it gets 667M tons of crude from West Qurna, and Russia would like Iraq to pay its $7B debt incurred by Iraqi arms purchases. If the sanctions go away but Saddam stays, Russian businesses stand to make a lot of money. That this issue provides an opportunity to poke a thumb in the eye of the United States is probably an added bonus.

      Not that Putin would ever be influenced by the oligarchs, of course. *cough* *cough*

      As for France, Total S.A. also has major contracts in Iraq, and that industry (oil) is not the only significant French involvement in Iraq (military and other industries as well). They may also have the thumb-in-the-eye motive, as well.

      China, apparently, has sufficiently close relations to have been involved in rebuilding and improving the Iraqi air-defense network (which, incidentally, was hit in at least three major airstrikes this _week_. That's not very subtle...)

      Russia, France and China are all permanent members of the UN Security Council.

      Oh, and for the rest of the world, it probably doesn't like being reminded that the US /could/ go it largely (Turkey is probably needed in any event, for Incelrik) alone. In addition, for many nations, it's a scary precedent if the US picks up a habit of replacing repressive dictatorships with republics, because there are a fair number of nations whose internal politics aren't terribly pleasing to the US.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:a year later by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2

      thanks for the replies and info -- just wish some of the statements were links. but cursory investigation (not like I have any REAL info, just Google) seems to corroborate your statements.

      really sheds some light on the subject, doesn't it?

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
  181. The real background and meaning of these events by Roger+Whittaker · · Score: 1

    Very interesting and informative information here: http://www.fromthewilderness.com/

  182. Other news in the world .... by Lolaine · · Score: 0

    11S2002:29th Aniversary from Pinochet's coup d'etat (with support from EEUU) ... This and more events are the answer to Harrison Ford's question (why?).

    11S2001:Was a day where the world told USA "Hey, you are not the center of the universe, stop bullying us".

    First accept Tokyo's protocol, International War laws, sign threats, don't start wars and then we can speak, until then, I won't be sad for 11S

    --
    ------- The last Sig. got fired.
  183. 9/11 Google Zeitgeist by jesser · · Score: 1

    In case you missed it last year, Google has re-posted 9/11-related search data such as the top gaining searches during the week of 9-13-2001.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  184. Re:Bully or Teacher? by KalenDarrie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wrote a comment to this, but to save space on this server I will only post a link to it. I don't agree with the above poster. But I will let the details of this be presented by my diary entry. Comments welcome here or there.

    Bully or Teacher

    --
    Kalen D'arrie
  185. The U.S. government contributes to violence. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    And, if you live in the U.S., get your government to stop secretly contributing to the causes of war: What should be the Response to Violence?

  186. film: september 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    today a film has been released over here, september 11. it has been made by 11 major film directors across the world. The aim was to enlarge thinking around 9/11, for example, how an Iranian school teacher tried to explain it to children, or other september 11 events, such as Allende being overthrown in Chile with US backing. enlightning, keep an eye out for it's release in the US. the trailer is here http://www.bacfilms.com/site/september11/video/ba1 1sept.mov The site is here http://www.bacfilms.com/site/september11/index.php 3#

  187. Re:US Response - corrected respone by artoo · · Score: 1

    Kuro5hin has a link to this article at New Times LA. It's unfortunate that I read this and think this is more true than I would have hoped. (Sorry about the dupe. I didn't select HTML formatted previously)

  188. Friend's opinion on 09/11 by u8nogard · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine recently send me the following url... He asked me to post it here and to get an opinion from the /. users, but have to be honest, I really don't know how I feel. I want to say that I am still confused over the event.

    What is your opinion on this article?

  189. Educate yourself please... by bethel · · Score: 1

    Please take this chance to educate yourselves. Dont' just go by what you read on the news, and what politicians are saying. Do some research and some critical thinking. The middle east, Palestinian/Isreali problem is more complex then you think. Here are some informative web resources taken from this site.

    History & Culture
    http://link.lanic.utexas.edu/menic/
    MENIC is run by the University of Texas' Center for Middle Eastern Studies, providing research and information on the Middle East.

    http://www.ccasonline.org/publications/teachmodule _whoarabs.htm
    This web page from The Center for Contemporary Arab Studies at Georgetown University entitled, Who Are the Arabs? gives cultural and historical information about the Arab world.

    http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/program/neareast/index.htm l
    The Hagop Kevorkian Center at NYU was created in 1966 to support the study of the modern Middle East and promote a more informed understanding of the region. The activities of the Center focus on the contemporary political economy and cultures of the area from North Africa to Central Asia, and on the historical processes that have shaped the present.

    With Princeton University, the Hagop Kevorkian Center maintains a video catalogue of over 175 films and videotapes on the Middle East and Islamic World which are lent free of charge to universities, colleges, secondary and middle schools in the tri-state area (New York, New Jersey, Connecticut). See http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/program/neareast/7_video_c atalogue.html

    The Center is developing a series of Virtual Classrooms for teachers with art guides, essays, and lesson plans. The first of these is entitled Andalusia: Islamic Spain. See Teaching Materials at: http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/program/neareast/7_teacher _training.html

    Politics
    http://www.mideastinsight.org
    Middle East Insight is published bimonthly by Middle East Insight, Inc., a nonprofit organization whose purpose is to provide a spectrum of views on the Middle East, to enlighten public opinion, and to promote better understanding between the American people and the peoples of the Middle East.

    1. Re:Educate yourself please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all those complex problems in the middle east can be fixed with simple nukes.

  190. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, and kooks like the +5 insightful "peace and bunnies" poster above could only have that attitude if the bad guys trying to kill him are too afraid of his big brother.

  191. On the inevitable Iraq discussions... by Mantrid · · Score: 1

    Anyone else wonder if GWB is just like messing with Saddam's mind or something? Allowing press leaks, etc. etc. Maybe shuffling around the odd troops.

    But nothing firm has happened yet. Even NATO says that there is no Iraq invasion anytime soon.

    Is the US trying to down Saddam by giving him a stroke with all of this rumour and perceived threats?

    1. Re:On the inevitable Iraq discussions... by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      Three air raids on Iraqi air defense installations in /one/ week? Including an unusually large one that, reportedly, involved over twenty American and British airplanes? The stockpiling of munitions in the region has also been noted.

      If I were Saddam, I would probably have at least a twitching in my eye at this point, and would probably be looking for ways to stall.

      Way 1 -- "negotiate" about weapons inspectors. First, allow reporters, politicians, and other non-experts there, and lead them around on a leash. Then, say that _in principle_ they could be let in, but then there's the sovereignty issue so the palaces should be off-limits, and for logistics reasons the inspectors need to first present a schedule, and then there's the demand for showing good faith via a promise to lift the sanctions and drop the war talk. Then stall further. Mistakes are made, inspectors get denied access at times, renovations block areas...

      Way 2 -- Remind Bush that Ariel Sharon is Israel's head of state, that Sharon has nukes despite the official Israeli denials, and that Sharon isn't the type of guy to hold back just because Bush says so. And then Bush can use his imagination as to what that could /possibly/ imply.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  192. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Karamchand · · Score: 1

    Hello xtheunknown,

    I really liked your post and wanted to ask if you might allow me to put part of it into my quotes collection (of course with the source mentioned)
    I'd be happy if you contacted me for further questions at the-hyphen at gmx.net
    Thank you very much in advance,
    Karamchand

  193. Wearing your tinfoil hat again? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Destroying the environment? Pshaw... How many two mile thick clouds of smog that occlude 10% of the sun's light hang over the US? Oh that's right, it's over southeast asia, not the US...
    The US may of been guilty of environmental disasters in the past, but US industries are amongst the cleanest in the world. You can't even kill yourself in your garage w/ a car that meets CURRENT emission standards (not the insane ones that some people would like to impose)
    And what EXACTLY is wrong w/ genetically modified food? In the case of Argentina, it was a patent issue (which is the subject of a whole other argument and a whole other rant) and not the fact that it was genetically modified food...
    Oops, wait, I'm at work... shouldn't be ranting on /.

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  194. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  195. Condolences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No matter your political viewpoint, your heart should go out to all the innocent people who suffered a loss one year from today. I know that mine does.

    E

  196. Lest We Forget by simong_oz · · Score: 1
    I hope that the ANZACs will not mind if I borrow a famous line to remember the occasion of September 11, 2001. I have always thought that this simple phrase is one of the most moving and poignant ever uttered.

    "Lest We Forget"


    To all of those who knew people affected by the terrorist attacks on September 11 and the aftermath of that event - however small or great the bond was and whatever nation you come from - my greatest heartfelt sympathies go out to you.
    --
    "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
  197. Looking back at last year's story... by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1

    ...it's interesting to note that "BOMBS THESE FUCKERS BACK TO THE STONE AGE" got modded up to +5, Insightful, but a riveting eyewitness account of the WTC collapse only merited a +4.

    1. Re:Looking back at last year's story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad now those posts would be moderated down... WE STILL NEED TO BOMB THE FUCK OUT OF THOSE BASTARDS... why the hell are people becoming pussies ... do we have to get attacked again?? Damnit we NEED to attack iraq, and go back to war with afghanistan... god damnit.

  198. I wonder what Clear Channel's playlist will be... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    IIRC, Clear Channel got hassled over some list that got passed around a few day after Sept 11. It was a Do Not Play list. Here is a story about it.

    It seemed to me that some executive stood on some moral high ground and decided to 'protect' everyone from emotions that might well up when listening to John Lennon's 'Imagine' or S & G's "Bridge Over Troubled Water. Dumb. Another example of how out of touch with *people* corporations are.

    The only reason I think of this is because I happened to be listening to Ben Kweller's "Falling". (great tune) Hmm.

  199. Re:Puleeze! by Chaswell · · Score: 1

    I have to disagree with you. I was less able to comprehend what I was seeing then realize that this was going to have a very lasting impact on our way of life. Unlike the poster you were replying to, I don't think I specifically felt that freedoms would be taken away. I was more concerned about how this would increase anxiety and fear. I knew that it was a horrible reality check to people that thought we were safe from people that hated us.

    So I did not first think of fire and death, I thought more of how my Mom must be really upset and scared in her "safe" downtown condo in Florida. She was also the first person I called.

  200. Re:Puleeze! by revery · · Score: 1

    He can't sign something that guts the Constitution, unless it is also upheld by the Supreme Court.
    It also seems like everyone is forgetting that it was first passed by overwhelming margins in both the Senate -- 98-1 -- and the House of Representatives -- 356-66.
    I don't like the Patriot Act any more than you do, but it's not entirely the work of GW Bush.

  201. Re:Puleeze! by cyranoVR · · Score: 1
    Well, if we live in constant fear of being killed, and therefore cannot travel, work or even leave our homes...can you truly call that Freedom?

    Yes, I think the Terrorists CAN take away our Freedom.

    The preamble Constitution of the United States reads:

    We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


    Without insuring domestic tranquility and providing common defense, the blessings of liberty cannot exist.

  202. Reasoned, intelligent, and graceful? by Interrobang · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    What Canada are you living in? Not my Canada, apparently. I've watched the US go charging off blindly, led by a cadre of "chickenhawks" (war-mongers who were "otherwise engaged" when their turn to go fight in wars came along), looking to attack anyone and anything that might even be remotely connected in some vague manner to terrorist attacks. So far, their "reasoned, intelligent, and graceful" response has given the world

    a so-called "war" on Afghanistan, despite no real proof's ever coming out that Afghanistan was really involved in the Sept. 11th attacks;

    a looming "war" with Iraq, for no apparent reason other than that GWB doesn't like Saddam Hussein;

    a $50B increase in military spending in the US, an increase which by itself alone is more than the military budget of any other country in the world;

    a steady erosion of US civil liberties and rights, including the imprisonment without due process of two American citizens on spurious charges (Lindh and Padilla) as "enemy combatants";

    an extraterritorial concentration camp for unfortunate POWs in Guantanamo Bay;

    the odious phrase "regime change" and a resurgence in the belief that the US has the right to effect such changes worldwide by dictatorial fiat, military force, or covert operations;

    a steadily worsening situation in the Middle East, particularly involving Israel, Palestine, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq, possibly because of the eschatological beliefs of the US government's three major players;

    a "perpetual war for perpetual peace" bred out of (as far as I can see) a revenge mentality and a refusal to accept the last death. (As Martin Luther King said, "An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind.");

    the US's disregard for international criminal courts (such as the ICC, to which the US is opposed) and the rule of law shifting from tacit assumption to formal policy, making explicit the seeming belief of US policy-makers that there are two sets of rules: one for the US and one for everyone else.

    Well, if these are the results of a reasoned, intelligent, and graceful response, I'd hate to see the results if they just decided to act out of nationalistic fury...

    1. Re:Reasoned, intelligent, and graceful? by Wiseazz · · Score: 1

      a so-called "war" on Afghanistan, despite no real proof's ever coming out that Afghanistan was really involved in the Sept. 11th attacks;

      This doesn't even merit a response.

      a looming "war" with Iraq, for no apparent reason other than that GWB doesn't like Saddam Hussein;

      President Bush is right to threaten Iraq. They have been a constant threat and have backed anti-US establishments and have been a destabilizing influence in the Middle East for some time. I doubt the international community, either outwardly expressed or inwardly maintained, will feel sorry for Saddam when he is ousted and Iraq is established as a country with the good of it's people at the forefront, as opposed to one man's insane desire for power. If a war with the US is the catalyst for that, then so be it. Nobody will express gratitude and we will not expect it. But will will have removed a threat, and that's all we care about.

      a $50B increase in military spending in the US, an increase which by itself alone is more than the military budget of any other country in the world;

      I don't know why you're complaining. Having a strong neighbor to the south is very beneficial to Canada. What do you care what we spend?

      a steady erosion of US civil liberties and rights, including the imprisonment without due process of two American citizens on spurious charges (Lindh and Padilla) as "enemy combatants";

      There is little precidence for Lindh and Padilla's situation. They abandoned their nation and the rights and liberties that go along with that. To hell with them. We will spend more money prosecuting and protecting these two "Americans" than they deserve.

      an extraterritorial concentration camp for unfortunate POWs in Guantanamo Bay;

      "Unfortunate?" I'd say they're pretty goddamn lucky. We all saw what they did when Americans were captured.

      the odious phrase "regime change" and a resurgence in the belief that the US has the right to effect such changes worldwide by dictatorial fiat, military force, or covert operations;

      Nobody will be sorry for seeing Saddam go. I hope Bush can make his case on this tomorrow so everyone can understand. Do we have the right to effect a regime change in any country? If that country threatens us and we have the means, then yes we do. Remember, though, that we could not and will not do this without international support, expressed or otherwise.

      a steadily worsening situation in the Middle East, particularly involving Israel, Palestine, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq, possibly because of the eschatological beliefs of the US government's three major players;

      I fail to see how you can blame the US for centries of conflict in this region. The primary issues at heart far surpass the involvement of the United States. The US is a new player here... I don't believe we've made things any better, but they're not worse.

      a "perpetual war for perpetual peace" bred out of (as far as I can see) a revenge mentality and a refusal to accept the last death. (As Martin Luther King said, "An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind.");

      A perpetual war for perpetual peace will be fought mostly with diligence and diplomacy, not guns and bombs. There must be a spirit of constant war, if not the act of war itself. Don't be so literal.

      --
      My sig sucks.
  203. Today is 9-11 all over again by Ironpoint · · Score: 1


    There's Fighter jets buzzing my town. Making sure we're awake to watch the various memorials.

    Interstingly, the Governor did his speach at 6:30am. Who's watching tv at 6:30

  204. Re:Puleeze! by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

    Liberals? Last I checked, Bush & Ashcroft & co. are all conservatives. Did I miss their defection to the Democratic party?

  205. Elephant Hunters Praised for Job Well Done by wls · · Score: 2

    One year ago today, US soil was attacked. I expect to hear a lot about it in the news. I expect to see a lot of ribbons. I expect to see a show of security.

    That's why I'm not going to watch the news, wear a ribbon, but will make a comment on security.

    You see, a lot of American have already mourned and come to emotional terms with what happened. A day of remembrance is nothing more than a day of television ratings. Fair-weather patriots bother me even more; too many people just wear a ribbon to call attention to themselves more than to silently commemorate. The loss of Jim Henson, Gene Roddenberry, and George Burns seemed far more sincere by Americans on many accounts. Perhaps that's because we knew them more intimately, and we know we're supposed to feel bad, but just don't have the connection. I feel it's more important to be honest about your emotional state than to follow the trend of buying a $10 flag for your car and taking a company mandated minute of silence during your lunch break. Is it true loss felt, or more of the desire to just fit in because of peer pressure?

    Air travel will be particularly light as American's fear to board a plane this anniversary. We've got scud missiles pointed at the clouds. NIH is checking every single car that passes through its gates. Many US citizens tremble in not being able to leave Northern Virginia fast enough, wanting as much distance as possible between them and the District of Columbia.

    It just seems like society doesn't have common sense anymore. Everyone thinks the terrorists are out to get him or her specifically. At SAIC when the planes were falling from the skies, they locked down their parking lots and you had to show a badge. If you're a terrorist, and you've got scare resources of hijacked planes, where are you most likely going to put it... some place of specific military importance or of high political interest, or one of hundreds of SAIC buildings spread over the country? Hmm. Let's think.

    GEIS did the same thing for things like the Gulf War or threats from Iraq, and at times even took the GE meatball logo off the building. Security by obscurity just gives a false sense of safety. It's like covering your eyes so the monsters under the bed don't get you.

    We know for a fact that the terrorists we're dealing with are patient. They'll sit low for 10 years or more just planning. You think somewhere along the way they'd have access to a phone book with a street address. I'm sorry, but many of us just aren't that important enough to be attacked: what we do or produce can quickly be picked up somewhere else by someone else. Such an attack is wasted, and the terrorists know that.

    I understand the publicly stated reasoning behind it all: "we deal with government," "we make parts used in missiles," "we deal with the stock market." The reality is employees who don't understand risk analysis feel scared, and making a show of activity is creates the illusion they're protected. This way they'll go back to being productive and making money for the company.

    Take the anthrax scare. The day it came out, the very day, near the very hour of the news report, SAIC had to call in the HAZMAT team because someone reported seeing a white substance in the stall of the women's bathroom. When this happens, every call must be taken seriously. It's expensive, it's inconvenient, and it shuts the place down. It places a taxing burden on emergency response units, and those who seriously need it don't get the on-demand service required for a real emergency. Consider this, Bin Laden himself sneaks past dozens of guards and automated systems, by passes the lobby, conference rooms filled with military, skips over a great biological target like the cafeteria, and goes up half a dozen or so floors, sneaks into the women's bathroom, and drops a white substance overtly on the floor to be seen and recognized by the untrained. Great plan, or irrational panic? I'd argue that more financial damage was done by Americans who did a knee-jerk reaction without asking "come on, is this a likely target of benefit" than the planes themselves. Naturally, hours later the lab reports it's dust from the toilet paper rolls. Go figure. And to be fair, other companies were doing the exact same thing. What did security do? They passed out handy-wipe packets, the kind you get to wipe your fingers after a BBQ dinner, to everyone... yeah, that'll stop Anthrax.

    Let's get real, should a terrorist want to breach any of these facilities, do they have the resources to fake a badge? Sure do. But why go through that trouble, when you can point a machine gun at a minimum wage security guard. I once asked an AOL guard what he'd do if a gunman came in demanding to pass. The answer: "Hand him my keys and resign."

    Countries are always ready to re-fight the last war, never the current one. We assume that the tactics used will be the ones used again. That's not how wars are fought. Look at how the Red-Coats expected the engagement -- let's point guns at each other, you fire at me, I fire at you, we reload, and go till no one's left to drop. Change tactics, boom. Fast forward to present day, we've got all our defenses set up so that we can address a missile-flying and world-war-II threats. Duh, hasn't anyone realized the enemy is already on our land, has been for years, and has access to deploy from within our borders? Crippling a country has become so much easier now that people won't defend themselves and we rely on supply chains and lack the knowledge of basic survival skills.

    I loathe the airport and NIH security policies. First of all, ask yourself, if you were going to conduct another attack, would you be doing it on a day the Americans were waiting for it? The element of surprise just worked so well last time. So, where will todays stepped up security measures be tomorrow? Why weren't they in place yesterday? This is the same issue I take with holiday-only patriots -- where was your pride of country before this event, and why did it fade so quickly?

    What's worse is that even if we had all the security policies in place, all the time, even back in 2001, it would not have prevented the attacks. Even the US government admits that. So, I ask, why if we've just declared the procedure benefit-less do we engage in doing it, especially at such cost? The answer: because if we don't do something, people will says "you're not doing anything" -- and that looks politically bad for those holding public office.

    It doesn't take half a mind to fashion a decent weapon real-time on an aircraft from readily available supplies. There are so many ways to bypass security that even 60 Minutes got past airport security with a gun on national television.

    I'm surprised at how panicked Americans get, too. Two planes barely put a dent in the real face of New York. One plane damaged only a section segment of one wall at the Pentagon. Yet, people were acting like DC had been flattened and the shock wave was traveling hundreds of miles. That's movie special effects, not reality. I thought other countries had a problem with conceptualizing the size of the United States, apparently it's own citizens do as well. If something really bad is happening, please leave the public utilities and transportation means open to emergency units. News will still travel.

    The problem with current security policies is two fold. Number one, we don't take into account that the attacker is willing to trade their life for their goal. This one is hard to combat, because the common set of deterrents don't work. Number two, we don't take a pro-active stance; we believe the world thinks like us, shares our views, embraces diversity, and as a whole wants to get along. People, we're the ignorant ones.

    What this attack has shown is how unprepared we are, and more importantly, were. We can't want the government to protect our borders and at the same time deny them the means to provide that defense. Defense doesn't equate to war. And each time a country has been completely subdued by force, peace results, and usually good relations after the fact. Each time we let the politicians dictate how, we still have skirmishes and we've lost. Think Japan. Think Korea.

    Because we're in a panic, many Americans are willing to trade privacy, freedoms, and liberties for security. I shake my head at this behavior. Safety does not have to come at the expenditure of these things, and more importantly, shouldn't. Plus, the "security" we're getting is illusionary; it's not the real kind that gets the job done. It's a show.

    Let's wise up and start asking the right questions. What is the realistic probability that terrorists are going to attack today? ...that they are going to attack where you specifically work and live over better targets? ...and what is the cost you're paying.

    As the old joke goes, "elephants are excellent at hiding in trees." "What do you mean, I've never seen one before." "My point exactly." Before you allow fear and stress to ruin your emotional state and you've tossed every principle being an American is about out the window, ask yourself if those guys protecting trees from having elephants climb in them are actually providing value, and while you're at it, find out how many elephants they've personally been able to stop in the past.

  206. I thought you couldn't link to NPR's website by zaphod · · Score: 1

    Be careful, you might get a call from one of their many laywers!

    --
    Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you!
  207. An independent point of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I send late condolences to the families of 91101 vctms.

    I have never been to the US, nor Europe or even afghanistan so I think my view quite independent.

    From what I have seen on tv, it seems that we are headed torwards doom as a planet. First, america gets attacked, then they go into an ultra paranoid mode where they suspect everyone, quit issuing visas to genuine visitors, plan to bomb iraqi people and diss the UN etc.

    I mean we are scared of you guys. Our countries certainly do not have your kinda ammo and what happened really is that the talibans have really pissed off the US and now the US percieve everyone else as a potential terrorist.

    Understandable, but its just reinforcing the belief that the US only cares about the US.

    I think the US needs to make friends rather than fight everyone to push its agenda.

  208. slashdot is slow today... is slashdot to blame? by shren · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Is it just me, or did slashdot just slashdot itself when slashdot linked to an old slashdot article? If slashdot had a cacheing mechanism that cached slashdot's articles so slashdot wouldn't hit slashdot so hard, both slashdot and slashdot would come out ahead. Honestly, slashdot should keep the welfare of small sites like slashdot in mind when doing things like this.

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  209. I cannot beleive its been a year already. by wwwssabbsdotcom · · Score: 1

    I remember being at the WTC the weekend before 9/11 and calling a friend of mine who joined me for that trip to WTC and then the South Street Seaport for dinner. I had been in the towers before, but couldn't accept the fact that they both were gone. Looking up into the sky along the side of the buildings from the ground, they seemed like they were permanent. Sad that other people's ways of life are so against the Western worlds'. Some people say its because of the US's involvement in the middle East, others for our foreign policy in general, some say for jealousy of what a great country the Citizens of the USA enjoy living in. For whatever reason good vs. evil, East vs. West, Islam vs The World, whatever it might be considered, we bear the loss of fellow humans, friends, loved-ones in a terrible, cowardly act against freedom and what we beleive in. I'm hoping and praying that 9.1.02 is a safe and uneventful day. -mh

    --
    Relive the BBS Past - One Byte at a Time! www.ssabbs.com
  210. Re:One Year On: What has America Learnt? by Stonehand · · Score: 1

    US pressure did get Musharraf to crack down a bit on the madrasas in Pakistan, so there's probably a /little/ less indoctrination going on there. The training camps have also been disrupted somewhat, so even those that hate the US will have a somewhat harder time learning to express that hate in assorted nasty ways.

    As for how to piss off a religious extremist, all you have to do is not obey their every command.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  211. An eye for an eye ... by grip · · Score: 1

    An eye for an eye leaves us all blind.

    --
    Failure is not an option. It comes automatically enabled in every Microsoft product.
  212. Pentagon views by kryzx · · Score: 2
    Just thinking back on when I sat looking at the pentagon smoking, writing this comment (attached to the original story). What a crazy day that was.

    Several interesting follow-up points:

    • A few minutes after the plane hit the pentagon we heard two explosions. There was much speculation about what they were, but it wasn't until months later that we found out. Air Force jets usually observe speed limitations in populated areas, but not that day. What we heard were sonic booms as fighter jets arrived on the scene from Andrews AFB.
    • Our company is a provider of acquisitions support for DOD, so several of my coworkers were deeply involved in the Pentagon restoration project. What an amazing effort that was (and is). They set a very aggresive schedule, to get the outer rings rebuilt within a year, and they finished ahead of schedule.
    • I find it interesting that on that day, when land lines and the internet were gridlocked, I was only able to get through to my wife via cell phone.
    • Our building, especially the garage underneath it, smelled like jet fuel for three weeks after the incident.
    • The traffic afterwards was mayhem. All fed workers were sent home at the same time, and the bridges from VA to DC (which I used in my commute) were closed. I heard some horror stories. But I stayed in the office and waited. At about 3:30 I thought things had settled down enough so I ventured out. I took I-395 south right past the Pentagon, then the beltway over into MD. All the roads were empty, it was like a ghost town. I made it home in record time.
    --
    "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
  213. So you'd show up to a funeral... by Dasein · · Score: 1

    for someone's grandfather and complain that the service was a sham because they didn't say anything about your Uncle George who recently died?

    All you folks who're complaining that we should remember other people from other tragic events are missing the point. This is about the victims of 9/11.

    If you would like to stage a rememberance for people who died in some other event, please feel free. No one's going to stop you.

    If an american company wishes to salute the victims and the heros of 9/11 by forgoing advertising revenue for the day, that's thier choice. I think it sends a powerful message. The US culture is one of success at almost any cost. This says that it's more important to show support for the victims than it is to make a buck.

    --
    You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
  214. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not about death as revenge or justice as far as I'm concerned, it's about death because there's literaelly nothing else to do with these people. There's no way that human law can possibly carry out a "just" punishment against these people no matter what you do.

    We're talking about people who think it's OK to kill thousands of civillians and actively seek to do so. This isn't just "misguided," it's just plain wrong, but these people have all but been programmed to think this way.

    What would we do with them? Could we capture them and try to "de-program" them? Not very likely. When you're cheering the death of thousands of unwitting civillians, I'm tempted to say you're too far gone for rehabilitation.

    And what if it were possible? Would you enjoy living another 50-60 years knowing you did so utterly reprehensible and wrong? Normal people in the US prison system have to go through counseling when they take part in an execution, and that's just one person. How much counseling would you have to go through for 2000+?

    The only other "alternative" is to lock them up in a cell somewhere for the rest of their lives. And as far as I'm concerned, captial punishment is more humane than life in prison with no chance of parole. Nothing but you, the four walls around you, and your thoughts.

    These people are too far gone to even try to set straight. We'd be doing everybody a favor (including them) by killing them.

  215. Calling a spade a spade. by ellisDtrails · · Score: 0, Troll

    A year after on an attack on the United States which killed thousands of innocent people, it is a challenge to avoid polemics or hackneyed sentimentalism. The confusion stirred up by these events has raised tensions both between the cultural West and East, and within the West itself. The well intentioned from all over the political spectrum have analyzed and interpreted the events surrounding the specific attacks and the wider questions that surround it ad infinitum, yet no clear strategy or purpose has emerged from the West to deal with this crisis.

    The moral questions that surround the attacks, the nature of "terrorism", and the conflict between the fundamentalist Islamic world and the West are interesting but somewhat irrelevant. The attempt to paint different actors good and evil have gained nothing in the way of consensus and open up its supporters to claims of hypocrisy and blindness. On the other side, the justification of anti-American sentiment based on moral equivalency or past or current US actions, while having valid points, will win no converts and is suspect of being a front for latent anti-Americanism.

    So what are the options for the West? We can do nothing, but the status quo has given us our current situation. We can attempt to understand the perpetrators, but who the perpetrators are is an elusive subject itself. The conceit that we can actually understand them is also a bit unrealistic, considering the stark differences in the foundations of our societies, the difference in wealth and technology, and the deep hatred embedded on both sides.

    The difference in wealth and technology is a poignant one as it brings us to see the essence of the crisis. We currently have the technological means so far ahead of any of our possible adversaries that with the momentum of a unified West, we can stop any regime that supports the destruction of our culture. That difference in culture, wealth, and technology, is the raison d'etre for the nascent movements against the West. Couched in religious fundamentalism, it becomes even more dangerous, and practically incurable, unless the West was to give up the very core of its culture. As this is unlikely to happen, unless we destroy the power behind the culture that seeks to destroy us, we will be destroyed ourselves. To see this is as impossible is to be pessimistic as to the power of our society. To see this as easy is to be naïve. The political correctness that leads us away from calling a clash of civilizations "a clash of civilizations" reveals our soft underbelly.

    I am not a hawk or a warmonger. Before this crisis emerged, I would have been against any moves by the US or the West that would be seen as imperialistic or bullying. After careful consideration however, I no longer care about the perceptions of the US by those both on the inside and the outside of Western society. By eliminating the regimes in Iran, Syria, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia, we will do a service to countless future generations by removing the vitriolic cancer of hate and ignorant religiousness that permeates those societies. To think that someday (and I'm not sure if it is as soon as the media is no portraying it) these societies will not possess nuclear weapons and use them against us is naivety to the point of delirium. This is no crusade, to call it such would be to further couch our motives in destructive religious terms, it is a battle for human progress and civilization.

    Under confusion, non-cooperation, and disinterestedness, Rome was overrun.

    (originally posted by me on internet infidels )

  216. Faked Footage by waldoj · · Score: 1

    I'm still really pissed off about those palistineans dancing in the streets with joy while downtown Manhattan was busy getting covered in 2 inches of soot.

    No time to track down a link now (sorry), but it turned out that the journalist was giving out treats to the crowd in exchange for getting them to "celebrate."

    -Waldo Jaquith

    1. Re:Faked Footage by VP · · Score: 2

      No time to track down a link now (sorry), but it turned out that the journalist was giving out treats to the crowd in exchange for getting them to "celebrate."

      If you don't have the link, then you are trolling.

      The footage of the Palestinians celebrating was not disputed even by the Palestinian representatives in Rammalah. One of them was trying to tell us that "they didn't really know about the victims." I didn't buy it then, I still don't buy it...

    2. Re:Faked Footage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit, how many times have I heard this urban legend? Please, don't help propogate it.

      http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/cnn.htm

    3. Re:Faked Footage by Fjord · · Score: 2

      I don't buy it either. If I were a Palestinian, you couldn't stop me from dancing in the streets.

      --
      -no broken link
  217. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by gosand · · Score: 2
    Whether you are christian, muslim, jew or otherwise, the common thread is that man does not determine who lives and dies, god does. Think about that.

    Holy Crap, do you even see what is wrong with this statement? You have just crammed YOUR religious beliefs into a sentence that is supposedly about letting people believe what they want to believe. YOU need to think about the fact that not everyone believes in God, let along YOUR god. Not everyone has the same views, you need to respect that.

    But I do agree with you about peace and harmony. The real problem here is that sometimes you cannot hug someone and make it all better. You need to accept the fact that there are people out there whose beliefs and actions threaten others. Changing your beliefs will not necessarily change theirs. Even if you strive for peace, they may not. What do you do then? Palastine/Israel is a prime example. There is no clear right or wrong in that situation, if there was then the outcome would be obvious. It is not. I think the source of a lot of the world's conflicts can't be solved by organized religion because they are CAUSED by the beliefs that organized religion perpetuates. A lot of the most horrific things that the human race has done have been in the name of religion. So I agree that we should all pursue peace. But do it for the sake of peace, not under the guise of religion.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  218. I dropped out and tuned in by freality · · Score: 1

    It was the worst day of my life.. my now fiance had gone to work downtown that morning and I had slept in.. I work with people on West coast and in New Zealand, and work doesn't start until later.

    Well, I was awakened with phone calls.. my friend mistook my early morning groggly voice for grief, and said "oh my god, is Sarah OK?" . "What? why?", I said. "You haven't heard? The Trade Center is gone.. it's just gone.. two planes crashed into them and they fell over"

    Well, the first minutes after that were a delirium.. I think for a full minute I was frozen after I realized that the TV was out and the phone lines were too.. what could I do?

    Well, Sarah worked close to the Trade Center, but fortunately, she'd been re-routed in her commute, and later that day I got ahold of her and then finally got her home. The only good news of the day was that many people had the same experience. The bad news of the day.. well.. it's hard to call that news even.. more like the Bad of that day..

    The first week we were glued to the TV.. I've long been interested in history and politics, and it was clear that this event would be one of the most significant historical events of my life.. I was still in shock from that morning, really, and needed as much information as possible.. I didn't want to feel powerless again.

    That didn't last long though.. I quickly realized that the trajectory of TV was going away from information and towards politicization. I'd always thought this was the general case with TV, but here it's ugly head was reared up again, and at the worst of times.

    I stopped watching TV, and slowly stopped reading new papers. I stopped reading slashdot, and everything. I stopped listening to music, and reading.

    Finally, after a few months of quiet-time, long walks outside, time with family and friends, and many quiet reflective hours, I started reading again. Just light stuff at first, but finally, books about the Middle East, books about modern politics, books questioning the standard lines of argument. And slashdot again, and kuro5hin, and emails with others that were starting to do the same.

    Well, now a year later I have finally started paying attention to the news again, and all I can say is, it's sickening.

    What's happening in our government and in our country's foreign policy is.. well, you'll have to decide. But, consider that you don't have a voice in it.. Bush was ready to make war without any sort of democratic process, much less a popular process. Judging from the comments here today, it's obvious why. Most people want to know why things got to be this way. Most people want to keep them from happenning again. Seemingly, the only ones in the world who answer "Evil" and "Conquer Evil through War" to those questions the same ones who could be included in the blame, and who stand to benefit most: our government. Notice the rest of the world.. really almost every nation of the UN answers: "Your foreign policy created a monster" and "Deal with it ethically and legally".

    Our governments answers sound too simple intentionally. They're meant to play off of our desire for security and simplicity in our lives again. Please, see what other opinions are out there and if they're substantiated. If we commit attrocities to others in some sort of simplistic reaction to a situation we helped create.. well, we won't have those simple peaceful lives.

    I've taken off of work today to spend time with my fiance.. to reflect and mourn. Maybe we'll see you in the streets.

  219. Reflection of America by dopeghost · · Score: 1

    Perhaps one of the most important lessons of today could be to look at America's foreign policy since Sept. 11 as it is widely agreed that it was this that helped provoke the attacks.

    3000 cillvians may have died in the WTC attacks yets many 1000's more died in America's attacks on Afganistan

    America is attacking Iraq on the basis that they won't allow access to weapons inspectors ...while America alone rejected to enforce 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention agreement on inspections.

    America and its new war on terror stinks of hypocracy and imperialism ...rather than a country that has tried to learn from a tragedy.

    --
    This UID is 7651 digits too high to subjectively infer IQ from.
  220. black 9.11 graphic by tgw · · Score: 1

    OSDN .. thank you for replacing banner ads with a black graphic for 9.11 .. a simple, classy, and appropriate way to remember those who lost their lives today ..

  221. 9/11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course we should mourn the deaths on Sept. 11.

    On that date in 1973 the democratically elected government of Chile was overthrown by the CIA-sponsored military, resulting in the deaths (ironically) of about 3000 people and bringing the dictatory Pinochet to power.

    I guess you're a terrorist only if you're on the other team. :-(

  222. The most important "news" is ignored! by dpt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having sampled much of the "anniversary" rubbish currently being run instead of news in papers, on website and on television, I've noticed the most important *new* story has been missed.

    That is, the massive public backlash against this over-wrought, corporatized, media-hyped grieving period. Everyone I know, even people who usually suck at their various media feeds like a crack pipe, are one and all rejecting the media hype surrounding this "event", and doing their own thing to remember in a dignified fashion.

    I've never seen anything quite like it, such a broad rejection of mass-media values and corporate mandated "feelings time" - and of course there's not one mention of "people expressing disdain for media exploitation of grief" anywhere to be found on the "news" ...

  223. Sadness by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That so much hatred could be directed toward what is undoubtedly the worlds freest country. I'm sick of all the anti-American sentiment I've heard in the last year. We are either blamed for not doing enough(East Timor is a really good example) or for doing too much(supporting Israel, etc.) We're just like the rest of the world, only more successful. The rest of world's problems are not our fault.

    That in over 50 years since Israel was founded, their enemies still don't recognize them enough to even put them on their maps.

    That Palestinian children are so brainwashed into hating Israel, scores of them have strapped bombs on themselves in order to blow themselves up as well as many Israeli citizens as they can take out.

    That Iraq is able to scoff at international law, kicking out the U.N inspectors and rebuilding their weapons of mass destruction while the rest of the world(except the U.S.) turns a blind eye.

    The really sad thing is that when all is said and done, Palestine will end up with no more than they were already promised before the start of the infitada. The Taliban is gone, Al-Qaeda has been scattered to the wind, and Iraq will undoubtedly see a regime change. All that vehement hatred directed toward the U.S. and Israel, and what is it going to get them? Nothing, if not less than what they had before.

    That is truly sad.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    1. Re:Sadness by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      "That Palestinian children are so brainwashed into hating Israel, scores of them have strapped bombs on themselves in order to blow themselves up as well as many Israeli citizens as they can take out.""

      Sorry to ask, what you know about Israeli (Jewish) kids and how they are brainwashed?

      You missed the point, religions suck, no peace with religions and fundementalism.

    2. Re:Sadness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... I agreed with you until you started talking about Iraq.

    3. Re:Sadness by xenoweeno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That Iraq is able to scoff at international law, kicking out the U.N inspectors and rebuilding their weapons of mass destruction [yahoo.com] while the rest of the world(except the U.S.) turns a blind eye.

      Now would be a good time to point out soem of the things that the report on Iraq's WMD status actually says:

      • Iraq does not possess facilities to produce fissile material in sufficient amounts for nuclear weapons.
      • It would require several years and extensive foreign assistance to build such fissile material production facilities.
      • It could divert domestic civil-use radioisotopes or seek to obtain foreign material for a crude radiological device.

      Of course, the only logicaly title for the article on Yahoo is "Iraq Could Make N-Bomb". The titles of articles that appeared in other publications were equally asinine--"British think tank warns of Iraqi threat" for example.

    4. Re:Sadness by Cederic · · Score: 3, Interesting


      >> That Iraq is able to scoff at international law, kicking out the U.N inspectors and rebuilding their weapons of mass destruction [yahoo.com] while the rest of the world(except the U.S.) turns a blind eye.

      Countries with nuclear weapons (confirmed):
      USA
      Russia
      UK
      France
      India
      Pakistan

      Countries with nuclear weapons (suspected):
      South Africa Indonesia
      Israel

      Countries with chemical warfare capability:

      Countries with biological warfare capability:
      USA (confirmed development of Anthrax)
      UK (has tested)
      Probably others.

      Countries the US need a pretext to attack:
      Iraq

      Please don't fall for the current propaganda about Iraq. Try putting yourself in their shoes - wouldn't you seek a means of defending yourself against aggressive bullies?

      Face it, the US want to attack Iraq, and they'll pick any excuse they can.

      Incidentally,

      >> That so much hatred could be directed toward what is undoubtedly the worlds freest country.

      I hadn't realised people were directing so much hatred at Canada and Sweden.

      If you think America is free, please explain wtf is happening in Guantanamo Bay (sp?), why the people of Afghanistan have had to suffer an American invasion, why the people of Iraq are building air raid shelters, why most black people in America live in poverty.

      I'll hush now.
      ~Cederic

    5. Re:Sadness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot that Iraq has both Biological weapons and Chemical weapons (after all, what did Saddam drop on the Kurds?). Nobody denies this - even the people opposed to an invasion of Iraq.

      As for Guantanamo Bay, the same thing is happening as what happened to Allied and Axis POWs in WWII. The only difference is that they are not subject to the same humiliation that American and British prisoners were subject to under Japanese custody.

    6. Re:Sadness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm sick of all the anti-American sentiment I've heard in the last year

      Maybe you should look at what the real 'anti-Amirican sentiment' is directed at, instead of
      what you've been spoon fed. The world does NOT neccassarily hate the United States (please note the correct name of this country), but does hate when our foriegn policy screws with them and thier
      way of life.

    7. Re:Sadness by akuzi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > That so much hatred could be directed toward > what is undoubtedly the worlds freest country. What makes you think that the US is any freer than Sweden, Holland, New Zealand, Canada etc etc? Americans are indoctrinated from childhood into believing they are the freest and most democratic country in the world, but never ask the question whether this is really true. If Americans have the right to free speech why is their no open debate in the mainstream media about the big questions like why the Govt seems to be completely controlled by big business and what can be done about it? Does the US really have the right to change the regimes of other countries as it sees fit? Why is criticising the Govt's foreign policy often said to be being 'un-American'? If America is truely the most democratic nation why is it that most the Govt is made up of wealthy middle aged white men serving the interests of big business? Part of why there is so much hatred towards America is that Americans themselves are seen to be so ignorant of what is going on in their own-country and in the rest of the world.

    8. Re:Sadness by N1KO · · Score: 1

      Prisoners in the roman empire where treated worse than in japan during wwii.

      Is there a point to my comment? No.
      Is there a point to your comment? No.

    9. Re:Sadness by booyaka · · Score: 1

      We are either blamed for not doing enough...or for doing too much(supporting Israel, etc.) The United States never has and never will support any country that it does not have a vested interest in. Why does it support Israel..yep...oil. An outlet to the sea, and an inlet to the vast oilfields of the middle east. However, the U.S. cannot make a decisive move with israel for fear of losing its current oil supply. As for the palestinians, they do not want peace. One leader of a middle eastern country was quoted as saying: "the only people we hate more than the jews are the palestinians". If peace were to come, and palestine be established as an autonomous democracy, this would be the death knell to the current way of life in many middle eastern countries. Voting? Women Voting? Women working? free speech? freedom of religion? not likely. Arab factions are making sure peace does not come about for fear that if it did they would suddenly be in the spotlight for thier human rights abuses. abuses, by the way, that the US overlooks in it's need for oil. So let's be realistic, the U.S. does not do very much at all, except set things in motion and then move in for the looting after the dirty work is done. They very obviously have it within thier power to establish Palestine as a democracy, but don't. Instead choosing to continue to trade with the very factions causing the problem, and prolong the violence. What the white christian junta in washington really want is for the jews and arabs to go to war, and then they will side with the victors.

    10. Re:Sadness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, you don't believe that it is worth correcting errors in posts. I was merely refuting the idea that what is going on at GatMo constitutes a violation of human rights.

    11. Re:Sadness by Tonytheloony · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would you mind explaining in what way you are so "undoubtedly" the freeest country in the world? Facts speak louder then your (brainwashed) opinion

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    12. Re:Sadness by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 2

      One correction:

      South Africa is the only nation in the world to posess and then destroy their nuclear weapons (lots of development was shared with the Israelis).

      The reason for their turn around? An awareness that black majority rule was inevitable, and a desire not to leave nuclear weapons behind.

      --

      ---

      Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

    13. Re:Sadness by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 1
      Would you mind explaining in what way you are so "undoubtedly" the freeest(sic) country in the world?

      For several reasons.

      Freedom of speech and of the press and of assembly to a degree that would shame most of Europe. Not only do we have dissenters here, many, like Noam Chomsky for instance, are fairly prominent.

      Freedom to keep and bear arms. You can now scratch Canada, UK, Australia, and New Zealand off the list of "freest nations".

      Our businesses have far more freedom to hire and fire workers than the vast majority of industrialized countries. Conversely, our working population has more freedom to change jobs, move to a different location, acquire new skills.

      Because our country has so much freedom, we also enjoy much higher social mobility than virtually anywhere else in the world. All that it takes to go from poor to rich here in the U.S. is the willingness to work hard.

      As a result of our freedoms, we enjoy the highest standard of living in the world. From the CIA factbook: "US business firms enjoy considerably greater flexibility than their counterparts in Western Europe and Japan in decisions to expand capital plant, lay off surplus workers, and develop new products."

      You might be saying, so what, that's business firms, not the general public. Well, 2/3 of all Americans are employed by small, family-owned businesses. Small business in America is widely seen to be the engine of economic growth. That's just another indicator of the freedoms we enjoy here in this country.

      Far from being brainwashed, my statement about being the freest country came about as a result of trying to find another country, anywhere in the world, that could claim to have as much freedom as U.S. citizens do. I couldn't find one.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    14. Re:Sadness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um..you sir are a dumbass. If you think America is not so free, why are there waves of immigrations still washing up on our shores? surely no sane person would want to live under such tyranny! but of course this would be an inconvience to your tired arguments.

    15. Re:Sadness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Freedom of speech and of the press and of assembly
      > to a degree that would shame most of Europe. Not
      > only do we have dissenters here, many, like Noam
      > Chomsky for instance, are fairly prominent.

      Noam Chomsky is such an isolated example almost ignored completely by the mainstream press. The amount of dissent in the press and generally amoung the Americans I know seems very minimal to me (I am a NZer living in New York).

      > Far from being brainwashed, my statement about
      > being the freest country came about as a result of
      > trying to find another country, anywhere in the world,
      > that could claim to have as much freedom as U.S.
      > citizens do. I couldn't find one.

      Well I think there are a number of candidates, but let me argue the case for Holland.

      In terms of economic freedom it scores slightly higher than the US on the Heritage Foundation/Wall Street Journal 2002 Index of Economic Freedom guide to the world's economies. See also this link Freest Economy? It's Not the US. This is a rough measure of the amount of regulation and internal restrictions within each economy - (Note so do 7 other countries including New Zealand and Ireland).

      In terms of personal freedoms the US has very liberal gun laws to the point of insanity, definitely freer than the tight gun laws in Holland. In other areas it is far less progressive than Holland. In particular in Holland has the much more liberal drug and prostition laws. Gay marriages are legally recognised in Holland and euthanasia is legal (both not true in the US). The legal age of consent for consenting make-female sex amoung adolescents is 12 years old (the lowest in Europe), lower than any state in the US. Hell in the US sodomy is still illegal many states - in Idaho it carries a possible life sentence in prison! Nude topless and nude sunbathing is a common sight on Dutch beaches, as is hardcore pornography on cable TV. In Holland abortions are freely available to anyone, syringes and methadone and contraceptives are also paid for by the Government..

      In the US the legal drinking age is 21, whereas most other places it is from 16-18 (16 in Holland for beer 18 for spirits). Smoking age in the US in 18 to 21, 16 in Holland.

      Holland (and most other Western countries) have freedom of speech, equality, freedom of association etc. protected by its constitution. There's nothing unique about the US in that regard.

      The US isn't 'undoubtably' the freest country in the world by any stretch of the imagination.

    16. Re:Sadness by Cederic · · Score: 2


      Oh, and other 1st world countries don't get immigration? Haven't you seen the immigration figures for Europe yet?

  224. Perspective Re:Bleh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember. I got emails from relatives.
    I started collecting stories every day from the web and posted some of the emails.
    I made my own little bhuj quake site for family and friends.
    For the first month a few friends and family checked it out.
    After the initial month, people were too busy to look.

    This year, in August, over 1.5 yrs and a huge riot later, a close friend's wife went to help directly in Bhuj. When I asked if she had done any sight seeing or sampled some of the great food, the reply: she did not have time, she worked. BTW, she's probably in her 50's.

    People perform actions, most of them are private in scope and miniscule in comparision to the media-grabbing stances.

    Remember them when you remember the 11th.

  225. LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by somethingwicked · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The whole point of the matter is that no one deserves death, even those who take up arms against you.

    It is so sad that you think this is true.

    There are VERY few people in this world that I wish death upon. They didn't accidentally have a stray bullet hit someone. .Someone that by choices TARGETS innocent civilians for mass murder *deserves* to die.

    If you wanted to debate WHO the actual killers were, fine. Maybe the mastermind is the only person left who should go down, some might say that anyone who EVER heard even a whisper of a possibility of the plot and did not act is subject to death as well.

    But to make a broad, generalizatation that NO ONE deserves death is just too much.

    I WILL WISH DEATH UPON THEM. I do NOT pity them beyond the sad choice that have made, and their crass indifference to the impact their childish rage has brought.

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

    1. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by pi+radians · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's great to say that considering what happened one year ago. But realize that the US has been responsible for a huge amount of innocent civilian death.

      Quick reminder: 1945 the American government was directly responsible for destroying TWO WHOLE CITIES. Millions of innocent people became vapor in a millisecond.

      Who deserves to die now?

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    2. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yawn. Two whole cities full of people that would have inflicted death on millions. Read your history man. Fewer people died because Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed.

      And the truth is, Nagaski was only bombed because the Japanese Empiror thought the US only had one bomb. He refused to surrender after Hiroshima.

    3. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by buswolley · · Score: 1

      when ever people say this i have to remind them of their ignorance. Yes we did destroy two japanese cities with a big bright ploom. But the US wiped out entire cities in Japan daily, with massive drops of conventional bombs. yes that is right. The US destroyed entire cities with conventional warfare dropped from the sky. THE Nuke, just did the same thing in one very impressive boom. Sleek killing design. And YES. War is a tragedy with no real winner.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    4. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by thesadmac · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly, they'd already pretty much surrendered when the bomb was being flown over. The military just wanted to test out their new shiny toy.

      Also, I beleive that America has bombed something like 35 countries killing 3 million people in it's history. That's quite a lot. That's as bad as Germany and the number of Jews they had killed.

    5. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Quick reminder: 1945 the American government was directly responsible for destroying TWO WHOLE CITIES. Millions of innocent people became vapor in a millisecond.


      Just out of curiousity, which "TWO WHOLE CITIES" did the American government destroy in 1945, and which "Millions of innocent people" became vapor?

      If you are talking about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, then you might want to do some research to brush up on the effects of those two atomic bombs. Because not only were there not "Millions of innocent people" vaporized, there weren't even a million casualties. Nor were TWO WHOLE CITIES destroyed.

      Finally, it's horrible whenever anyone dies, but the fact remains, Japan and the United States were at war and bombing, killing, etc. is the sort of thing that happens during war.
    6. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you are equating perfectly acceptable target destruction of industrial centers of an enemy that attacked us without any provocation with the terrorist attacks of 9/11?

      Please expand on this crock of shit.

    7. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Brits had a lot to do with that, we don't strike first(well until Iraq in the future). Don't kick a rabid dog and don't stick your head in a lions mouth. I think we(the US) should start nuking the middle east, all arab countries, and most of Europe. If you want an aggressor, then we can show you what that really means.

    8. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by Karn · · Score: 1

      Ok, Hitler called for the extermination of thousands of people for no good reason.

      The US bombed a Japanese city in retaliation to their active agression, their act of war.

      The idea that you find the two comparable is interesting, to say the least.

      The difference is that the US isn't a militarily agressive country for being a superpower, not when compared to ther countries throughout history.

      --


      Why do I keep typing pythong?
    9. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by Stonehand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here are some statistics for you.

      Total imminent fatalties, Hiroshima:
      Est. 75,000.

      Total imminent fatalities, Nagasaki:
      Est. 40,000.

      Total imminent fatalities, US/UK Dresden firebombing:
      Est. 135,000.

      Total Chinese civillians killed in the Rape of Nanking:
      Est. 200-300K.
      Total number of rapes committed there by the Japanese occupation:
      Est. 20K.

      Total number of Chinese civillians killed by the Japanese, 1931-1945:
      Est. 30M.

      Total number of wars of aggression or war crimes that Japan has committed since 1945:
      Zero.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    10. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by 5foot2 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for a little context.

    11. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what bizarre mathematical universe does 3 million equal 6 million?

    12. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by DimitryP · · Score: 1

      What kind of fucking retard are you? America has killed 3 million people with bombing over the last 50 years, and you fucking DARE to equate that with Germany's genocide, killing 6 million Jews, gypsies, and other "undesirables" in the course of less than 10 years? I hope you rot in hell, you fucking asshole.

      --
      Guns are like umbrellas and condoms. Better to have one and not need it, than need it and not have one.
    13. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by letxa2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If I remember correctly, they'd already pretty much surrendered when the bomb was being flown over. The military just wanted to test out their new shiny toy.

      No, actually, you remember incorrectly. They were not surrendering and a full-scale invasion of the Japanese mainland would have been necessary. We dropped the bomb to convince Japan to surrender to save countless Americans AND Japanese that would die in the invasion. Japan still wasn't going to surrender because they thought we only had one bomb... so we dropped a second bomb and that convinced him.

      Make no mistake, the Japanese were not going to surrender. If they were, they would have done so promptly in the three days following the Hiroshima bomb. But even that wasn't enough.

      Also, I beleive that America has bombed something like 35 countries killing 3 million people in it's history. That's quite a lot. That's as bad as Germany and the number of Jews they had killed.

      Well, I'm not going to investigate that right now. I don't doubt we've killed many people, that's a given. However, even 3 million would only be HALF as many as the number of Jews Hitler killed. As a result of Hitler's conquest, 19 million Soviet civilians were killed in addition to 6 million Jews. That's 25 million civilians not even counting the millions of military that died on both sides during WWII.

      So, considering Germany wasn't even a superpower and their ambition for conquest killed 25 million civilians in about 8 years, the fact that the U.S.--as a true world superpower, capable of defeating any country on the planet--has only killed 3 million people in the the last 220 years is not bad at all!

      The U.S. is not perfect, no. But there has never been a country so powerful that COULD take over the entire world that didn't try. Say what you want about the U.S., we could annex the entire world militarily if we wanted to--yet our territory hasn't expanded for more than 60 years.

    14. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to break it to you, but Dresden is in Germany, not Japan.

    15. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      not to make light of death but reading the last line of your post:

      Total number of wars of aggression or war crimes that Japan has committed since 1945:
      Zero.

      the first thing that came to mind is: "for everything else there is Mastercard"

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
    16. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by mkoenecke · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming Dresden was a mistype, and he meant to say "Tokyo," although I think all the deaths in the Tokyo fire-bombing were "only" around 100,000.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    17. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Not to diminish the impact or point of your figures, but the number of Chinese killed by Japan - combatants and civilians combined - numbered around 11 million, by pretty much everyone's reckoning except the Chinese government's.

    18. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was given as context. The two cities we A-bombed had less casualties combined then the fire bombing of Dresden, which no one ever talks about.

    19. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      The bomb was dropped on the post office in the centre of town. What were they doing , posting the guns and ships to the troops.

      And what's provocation? If tensions are rising for whatever reasons between two powers for a period of time and it gets to the stage that their armed forces are at hightened states of alert (or should be in the case of the Pacific Fleet in 1942) then the first strike can't really be called unprovoked. Unexpected maybe.

      bin ladens mob have had at least two strikes against US targets prior to Sept 11, USS Cole and the African Embassies. So WTC wasn't exactly a surprise first strike in an undeclared war.

      No, I'm not a supporter of terrorism in any form or anti-american even if I don't accept totally the american viewpoint on everything. I believe bin Laden has absolutely no right to act the way he does. That does not mean he might not have a legitimate complaint against the US but I reject totally his way of pressing that complaint.

      It is frustrating to see so many Americans who do not or cannot even consider the idea that there is anything that America has ever done that could possibly be used as part of a reason for the terrorists dislike of America. Ever. Anything. That everything that America has done anywhere in the Middle East over the last 50 years has been good for everyone concerned and that is plainly so to any right thinking person. To say anything otherwise is to agree with the terrorist that they are justified in their attacks on civilians on US soil.

      I just can't accept that. Sorry.

  226. Not watching could = show of strength by delcielo · · Score: 2

    I will watch some of the programming, as a way of keeping the incident fresh in my memory; but I do object to some of the tone of the programming. Perhaps the best way to show our strength is to appear less wounded.

    We've done a great deal of healing since the attack; and if I felt we had a statement for Bin Laden, it would be that we are not nearly as wounded as he might think we are.

    Please understand that I'm not minimizing any of the hurt or loss; but look at us. We're arguing over what to rebuild at the site. We're flocking to the movies on weekends. We're gonna put Martha Stewart in the hoosgow. We're still driving from state to state without papers, and even still teaching people how to fly. Bin Laden failed to be as big a hazard as even traffic accidents last year; but look at what he and his organization have suffered. Outside of radical Islamic circles, he has lost any credibility he had. He's far from being ineffective; but his work is in fact very restricted compared to a year ago. Overall, he's a failure.

    So perhaps we should advertise our healing as well as our pain.

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  227. My take on this by Triv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alright, this might annoy some people, but I'll go for it because I'm frankly sick of all this.

    I live in New York. Last week I got an email from an old acquaintence ("Old aquaintance" translates to "sends me chain letters and won't stop") asking everyone on the list to pray for the dead and those who have lost. She also suggested that everyone drive with their headlights on today (Twin beams of light! Get it?!?). I normally ignore her, but on this one I snapped. Like a good portion of people in New York (I assume), the attacks affected me for two weeks. It was horrible to see the city shut down for a week - it seemed impossible. But life went on. I didn't lose anyone. I didn't didn't lose my job.

    But people refused to let go - the media and politicians, specifically, as well as Americans who now use this as a way of explaining who we are as a nation. It's not denial on my part or anything - the actual attacks haven't affected me in any way, emotional or otherwise, in a little under a year.

    The things that have affected me are things like the US PATRIOT act, Bush's rampant power-grab. So I emailed my friend back and told her to give $50 to the ACLU or the EFF. You want to help, fine, but prayer does absolutely nothing, and driving with your lights on is stupid. It's...painless. You're not pinching your budget, you're not donating time. Do something substantial.

    I think our attitude (ok, mine) is summed up perfectly as this: We don't ever want to forget, but we don't want to be constantly reminded either.

    It's not online yet but there's a wonderful article voicing this opinion much better than I can in this month's Harper's. I suggest you pick up a copy.

    Triv

    1. Re:My take on this by geekoid · · Score: 2

      most people need these events to help them cope with the loss. If you think the emotional impact only affected people of NY, you are wrong.
      It isn't about to towers falling, its about suddenlly relizing how vunerable we are, and how fast the worlds can change.
      You odn't wan't to pray? fine.
      You don't want to remeber? fine.
      but most people need to remember and talk about to to heal properly.

      so, how has the US PATRIOT ACT directly affected you? Its a fair question, because you seem to think that the attack on the towers isn't worth talking about because it has had no direct impact on you after the first to weeks. Which, as we both know, is untrue.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:My take on this by geekee · · Score: 1

      I doubt the patriot act has affected you personally one bit. Now if NYC gets nuked because the govt cant or wont do anything, that might affect you a little more. Remember bin laden's words "it is our religious duty to obtain nuclear weapons". Where do you think he wants to detonate them?

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    3. Re:My take on this by Triv · · Score: 2

      most people need these events to help them cope with the loss. If you think the emotional impact only affected people of NY, you are wrong.

      Yes, driving with your lights on makes one feel better. Fine. But it doesn't do anything apart from that. The attacks weren't a singular event, they were a part of a timeline. There were causes of it and radical changes because of it. Some of those changes were for the better, some were for the worse. Doesn't it make more sense to deal with the negative effects (like the PATRIOT act) rather than worrying about an event you can't do anything about anymore?

      It isn't about to towers falling, its about suddenlly relizing how vunerable we are, and how fast the worlds can change.

      Correction: how vulnerable we were. If there's one thing we got out of this it's the loss of the eighties, Iran-Contra era attitude of "We've been hijacked so we'll be docile because someone on the ground will save us". It was a singular, catastrophic and bloodthirsty act and, because of the way many attitudes have changed in the aftermath, it's unlikely to happen again. And if it does, we'll adapt again. It's like testing car safety - we can't possibly plug every security hole until we know the hole exists, and we can't know some of the holes exist until someone exploits them. And I don't think there's anything wrong with change. 5,000 people are dead, and I grieved for them. But I can't go on grieving for them. The event, as horrific as it was, is over.

      You odn't wan't to pray? fine. You don't want to remeber? fine. but most people need to remember and talk about to to heal properly.

      Firstly, I specifically said "we'll never forget, but we don't need to be reminded." I don't want to forget, but I don't want it to be forced on me as a driving force behind my life either. And secondly: no. Most people need to get on with their lives, get back into a routine and let things return to normal. That does not include President Bush reading the names of all 5,000 victims at Ground Zero. I said it before - most New Yorkers are over it. It'll always be in the backs of our heads of course, it was a traumatic few weeks. But the healing is not accomplished by thinking of all the people who are praying for us. It's done by living. The seems to me that the rest of the country is hanging onto this a helluva lot harder than we are - as I said originally, it's become a defining moment for anyone who wasn't even remotely close to here. I mean, if we were here and we're fine what's your hangup?

      so, how has the US PATRIOT ACT directly affected you? Its a fair question, because you seem to think that the attack on the towers isn't worth talking about because it has had no direct impact on you after the first to weeks. Which, as we both know, is untrue.

      That's kinda the point. You're right, the PATRIOT ACT hasn't affected me, and guess what: I don't want it to. I didn't have a say in whether my hometown got bombed or not, but I sure as hell have a say in whether my constitutional rights mean anything. I don't exactly live the good life, but I throw $20 a month to each of the ACLU and EFF. And as to talking about the attacks - there's nothing wrong with that, but don't kid yourself. There's nothing wrong with talking - if one doesn't talk, one forgets - I'm just sick of people empathising with me, sharing my pain and loss when I have no pain and haven't suffered loss, and assuming because I live here I need help, emotional or otherwise. New yorkers are a particular hardy group, so for the last time, we're fine. It's the rest of the country I'm worried about. ;)

      Triv

  228. Two Wonderful Ways To Commemorate by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 1

    Here in New York, they are reading the names of the lost. The radio has been broadcasting the reading live for the past two hours; they are in the P's now... it is a solemn and beautiful memorial, the only true memorial, in a sense.

    In the morning, Governor Pataki read the Gettysburg address. While he is not the most eloquent speaker, the words of that address are so powerful that they speak very directly to us, on this day, in this place. Try reading it slowly, out loud (or whispered) to yourself:

    Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation: conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

    Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war.

    We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

    But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate. . .we cannot consecrate. . . we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember, what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.

    It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us: that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion; that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain; that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom; and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

    --
    four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
  229. What I'd like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Personally, I'd like to see Bin Laden ride out of the Potomac on a white horse, storm the White House holding aloft a blazing sword and kick Dubya in the balls. Not that there would be any point to it but, if every one is bent on making the world a better place by remembering past injustices, it would somehow be in the spirit of the day.

    Of course, what I'd really like would be some on-on-one time with Natalie Portman but that has nothing to do with 9/11. Actually, nothing that I want has anything to do with 9/11 but everone else in the world seems to somehow think that everything they want depends on it so I figure I might as well join the bandwagon.

  230. Re:Puleeze! by howardjp · · Score: 1

    In America, we have two liberal parties.

  231. I have heard a lot but I'm not hearing a solution by enkidu55 · · Score: 1

    I have listened to the politicians and the people espousing words like revenge and justice. After watching those buildings fall last year, and yes I know it is a small tragedy compared with others on a global scale, I can't help but think to myself... Why? Why did this happen. What made these people so filled with blind hatred towards an entire nation of people? It has been 365.24 days and I don't feel like one step has been made towards answering that question. I see an impending escalation of violence in the world and all I'm asking is why? I really don't think its too much to ask for....

    Mod me up if you have a good answer

  232. moderate me troll if you must... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but isn't the US-centric and ignorant formatting of the date of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center symptomatic of America's attitude towards the rest of the world, certainly not the least cause of said attacks.

  233. September 8, 1902 by Microsift · · Score: 2

    You left out the worst natural disaster in U.S. history. The Galveston Hurricane of 1902 killed over 6,000 people.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  234. off the top of my head by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    Ok just off the top of my head, I'll give you some clues

    WIPO, think all the prople who die because of patents on drugs and the WIPO trying to wipe out clone productions.

    BUSH, I've got my finger on the button and it's twitching. enough said.

    RIAA,WIPO, There effectivly introducting a world where everything is licensed there fucking up contract laws and there probably lobying for hellish privicy laws the RIAA and WIPO are turning the world into a corporate state. fuck napster i can hum the songs if i want to copythem.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:off the top of my head by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      You are a crazed fanatic and I feel sorry for you. It must be sad to live in ignorance, having nothing better to do than flame on message boards. Moron!

  235. 9.11.1973 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    9.11.1973 - Remember that day?

  236. Re:How have I changed? I hope I haven't. by windex · · Score: 2

    My mind is constantly justifying its rejection of racisim to itself lately it seems. The same goes for most of our freedoms, e.g. do we really need, why do we allow, etc. I can't stand that I am now forced to do these things, espeically since I was raised in an enviroment where racisim and prejudice were intolerable. It makes me hate what happened more than any other element.

    I thought hard, and only made one promise last September, and that was to live each day to its fullest. I think I've succeeded so far, this last year I went from an apartment dweller with a girlfriend to a homeowner with a fiance, two new cars, and a dog. I like to think I'm trying to live the life so many others didn't have a chance to. That is the american way, afterall.

    I don't know that it took a terrorist act to force me to wake up, in fact, my outlook on the world is much dimmer than most. I know there are alot of high tensions in the world, mainly resulting out of what ammounts to jealousy and greed, and in the end, lots of things ammount to jealousy and greed, including the reasons behind why the US is what the US is today.

    During the presidental election, I was forced into voting for Bush over Gore, because I was afraid Gore might ruin my career (as a computer programmer), at least more than Bush is capable of doing in ignorance. As an afterthought, I'm still not sure what I would do. Does anyone really beleive Gore would've handle this situation in a more graceful way? I don't think so.

    So, mabye I'm awake, mabye I'm not. Mabye what I really want is someone to go ahead, and make the irrational decision that ends this problem one way or another. All things considered, that's the only way its going to happen anyway.

  237. Re:Puleeze! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that sounds a lot like how singapore has always been.

  238. gulfwar syndrom by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    I believe that the UK investigation started decided that it was the chemicals that the UK and US pumped there troops full of that caused gulfwar syndrom.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  239. Trying to understand the Hate America crowd by zaphod · · Score: 1

    I'm always at a loss when I hear or read someone stating how evil America is. I try to explain about all the good America has done such as helping to win WWI and WWII, feedding the needy, help promote freedom (America's true culture). But I never seem to be able to convince them.

    After reading some comments here from a year ago and from now, I realized you can't convince some people. How do you convince someone in the KKK that it is wrong to hate a group based on race? How do you explain to a Nazis that you can't hate and kill people based on their religion? You can't. I've learned that the KKK, Nazis and the Hate America crowd are just too closed-minded and full of hatred. It is a sad life.

    God bless America.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you!
  240. Putting things in perpective from here in NYC by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

    Okay, I'll try to keep it brief and to the point.
    I'm a fourth generation New Yorker. I went to Stuyvesant and had been coordinating donations to them a few weeks before. I was supposed to be in the WTC when the first plane hit and was late only because we were running behind getting ready for a presentation. I had a nurse coordinator sleeping on my sofa that night because she couldn't get home and had been working 'til midnight, I watched a friend of mine have a several day long delusional semi-pychotic break starting the 13th and myself spent several days, mostly in the rain, building the on-site logistics for the Salvation Army (was high enough in their rankings to have been offered control of their ground zero headquarters but was told that my work at 14th was more important).

    Blah, blah, blah. I could go on for a few more paragraphs. Suffice to say that I was in Manhattan that day and lived through actively troubleshooting throughout the cleanup and am still doing it now.
    Insert stuff about issues of helping friends with police/fireman funerals, trashed jobs, etc. Yeah, I've got all the cred, was there, did that, suffered, and so on.

    So, that having been said, WILL YOU PEOPLE PLEASE MOVE ON WITH YOUR LIVES?!?!? 9/11 was terrible. It caused all sorts of awful things and not nearly enough real reform (yet). But this morbid, self-righteous, flag-waving jingoism isn't helping anybody.
    If you really want to do something appropriate, take today as one for quiet contemplation of two things, the terribly pernicious effects of fanatical belief (which I guarantee, ties in both cause and effect ways to poverty and totalitarianism), and what you are going to actually do to try to raise a generation of saner, more financially secure children, who will be inculcated with the sort of understanding of rights, rigor, reason, and responsibility that will keep us from this kind of fucked up twisted criminality in the first place.

    Still reading? Then go here, get the damned thing (it was certainly enough trouble to create) and sign it.
    On my reluctant way down to "ground zero" for the day,
    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  241. Just blabbering and mourning by MrRee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, it was bad. I mourn that day when so many died by so few who felt that was the only way to make a statement or exact revenge or push some political agenda or whatever.

    A life, any life, is a precious thing that once taken, can never be returned. How can we protect our lives? How can we be safe? Freedom is inherently unsafe. Yet, between safety and freedom, I'll always choose freedom.

    My hats off to the couragous crew and passengers of the 4th airliner. If there were a civilian version of the Medal of Honor and if anyone truely deserved it, the people of that 4th airliner certainly do. Good job, thank-you and God bless.

  242. Re:Slashdot broke the news for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eerie how? every morning there you are sitting. we're you expecting to die as well? are you just a gaydo kharma whore? did you jump on the patriotic bandwagon on this day a year ago like the rest of the lames that read this shit page?

  243. Re:Puleeze! by Badanov · · Score: 1

    The government isn't surveilling everyone. Just anyone with munitions and an attitude. That feeling of a long erosion i the realization that abunch of towelheaded crazies were trying to instill fear.

    --
    Dawn of the Dead
  244. Struggling to laugh after 9/11 by tenzig_112 · · Score: 2

    I remember the The Onion's Bob Seigel saying that Irony was dead, a bit premature I think. When they came back, their 9/11 coverage was excellent.

    Ridiculopathy.com's 9/11 year in review also seems worth the read. Some of the stuff, quite dated by subsequent events, reads like a time capsule of topical humor immediately following that horrible day.

  245. Objectivist quotes for 9/11 by stopbit · · Score: 1
    I have found these quotes from Ayn Rand [philosopher/author] to be
    most fitting for today:

    I would give the greatest sunset in the world for one sight of New
    York's skyline. Particularly when one can't see the details. Just the shapes.
    The shapes and the thought that made them. The sky over New York and the
    will of man made visible. What other religion do we need?...Is it beauty
    and genius they want to see? Do they seek a sense of the sublime? Let them
    come to New York, stand on the shore of the Hudson, look and kneel. When
    I see the city from my window -- no, I don't feel how small I am -- but
    I feel that if a war came to threaten this, I would like to throw myself
    into space, over the city, and protect these buildings with my body.


    -The Fountainhead

    The building stood on the shore of the East River, a structure rapt
    as raised arms. The rock crystal forms mounted in such eloquent steps that
    the building did not seem stationary, but moving upward in a continuous
    flow - until one realized that it was only the movement of one's glance
    and that one's glance was forced to move in that particular rhythm. The
    walls of pale gray limestone looked silver against the sky, with the clean,
    dulled luster of metal, but a metal that had become a warm, living substance,
    carved by the most cutting of all instruments - a purposeful human will;
    the skyscrapers, the shapes of man's achievement on earth.


    -The Fountainhead

    ...those hatred-eaten mystics, who pose as friends of humanity and
    preach that the highest virtue man can practice is to hold his own life
    as of no value; parasite(s) in spirit, who plunder the ideas created by
    others...There is only one state that fulfills the mystics longing for
    infinity, non-causality, non-identity: death. A mystic relishes the spectacle
    of suffering, of poverty, subservience, and terror; these give him a feeling
    of triumph, a proof for the defeat of rational reality.


    -Atlas Shrugged

    For more information on Ayn Rand and Objectivism, go here.

    --
    ~insert tech sarcasm here~
  246. Re:Bully or Teacher? by lamz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wrote a comment to this, but to save space on this server I will only post a link to it. I don't agree with the above poster. But I will let the details of this be presented by my diary entry. Comments welcome here or there.

    I believe that your efforts to "save space" on this server are really just a ploy to profit from this tragedy by drumming up hits for your own site, so I choose not to follow your link. I might look tomorrow.

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  247. How get a top mod by Badanov · · Score: 1

    Oh my God! My rights are gone! Because of those terrible white republicans. Oh dear! They are the same guys that started the WTC bombing one, and we are to blame for this attack. Oh my! You are taking my 1st amendment rights from me! The US is to blame. Bush is to blame! Capitalism is to blame! Oh dear.

    --
    Dawn of the Dead
  248. BULLSHIT! by Lysol · · Score: 1

    First off, AC says it all.
    Second, The only way to avoid this kill and be killed is to stop supporting fucked up regimes abroad! Have you ever been abroad?! I was over in India, about 50km from the Pak border when Delhi was attacked last December. I was a scared shitless whitie driving parallel to the border, surrounded by foreigners, and seeing troops and big ass missle and weapons caravans drive by. War is not some little piss ass, edited for cnn, clip provided by the government for us (gee, that's an oxymoron if i've ever hear one).

    A lot of the Osama types are really pissed of not just at us, but at the ruling Saudi Arabia regime. You think just cuz they're our ally they're ok? Or did you even know that? Hmm, read about Whabism and more about the ruling Saudi family and you'll start to get an idea of why having the biggest waster of world resources in the most sacred place in all of Islam makes some people get really pissed. How would you feel if some people came to the parking lot of your church and started doing animal sacrafices or something against your God or Godly artifacts; things you thought were totally whacked?! Of course, it's not right to kill and not all Saudis (or anyone else for that matter) are 'bad', but events happen for reasons - right or wrong. The more people know about those reasons - i.e., history - the more they understand and can make better decisions. As much as I love the US, you think we're any less barabric than any other country out there? We definitely didn't kill 6 mln jews, but we helped kill ~ 2mln vietnemese, scores in central america (remember that!?) - and that's only 2 of many incidents in the last 30 years that the US has in/directly supported.

    If you travel outside the world, you get a pretty good idea of what the US is to others. A enigma; a place where everyone is wealthy; a place that makes great movies (some of the time); a place of freedom; a place where one can vote! (unless of course, your black and live in Florida); and, of course, a bully. Time and time again we've walked away from UN resolutions and global conferences because we can - and that's bullshit!. Do as I say, not as I do.. Uh-huh. I like most of us here. But I can't stand this attitude like 'we're sooooo innocent and right and screw you if you screw with us'. However, with extreme regimes around the world, this attitude is similar.

    And as far as loving democracy and freedom, you must be stoked right now! I'm sure you support right not to distribute DeCSS? (altho that was prior to 9/11, but still) The DMCA? (ditto) Detaining suspects with no proof of any wrong doing? The RIAA and their lot? The Berman bill?! Some of these don't have a direct link to 9/11, but the whole 'fuck freedom and the constitution' have made it easier for horrendous laws to see the light of day or the 'light' around the corner. Gee, further flushing down the toilet one of the few things that others in the world look up to us for.

    As far as 'un-America', wtf is that!? America is the most diverse country in the world! 'un-American'? Ya know, go grab your gun or whatever and go sign up for the army if this is how you feel. Go kill! Go perpetuate the endless cycle. Go for it! I , unlike you, get sick of people who have no common sense and no desire to get past the human condition of kill and kill again - something that 2000 years has done little to change. If more of you people that hate everyone or some just die off, then maybe those of us who really believe that there can be peace will have some room to achieve it. The constitution, not just for the US, but for every common person on this planet is more than just a noble idea. That's what you should be fighting FOR, no against! Ugh, people like you really piss me off - but, I'd never hurt you because of it. And, I'll always recognize your right to disagree with it.

    1. Re:BULLSHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As far as 'un-America', wtf is that!? America is the most diverse country in the world!


      BULLSHIT, indeed. You've never been to Canada or Europe have you?

    2. Re:BULLSHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you've never been to New York. Most diverse city in the world. Canada? Europe? Please.

    3. Re:BULLSHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been to both Toronto and New York (for several weeks each) and Toronto does seem to have a more multi-ethic population.

  249. sigh. by fizbin · · Score: 1

    You're not getting it, are you?

    There are people in this world who will in fact refuse to kill another person even when their own life is in danger.

    Really.

    Even when they actually have to make the choice in real life.

    Furthermore, there are people who can kill another person out of necessity without being happy about it.

    Frankly, I'd much rather live in a world populated by those people than by people hyped up on the idea of pre-emptive strikes.

    1. Re:sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are people in this world who will in fact refuse to kill another person even when their own life is in danger.

      Sure, there are people that would refuse to act in accordance with their own self-interests... Some would even abandon their own instincts for self preservation.

      But would you call this an admirable quality? It all depends on the circumstances.

      It is admirable that a rescue worker would knowingly risk his own life for the benefit of others.

      Could the same be said of Jews during World War II who simply went along with the Nazis, instead of offerring resistance?

      I'm not a warmonger... I'd much rather live in peace than strife. I'm perfectly content to let others live their lives in whatever manner they choose, but not to the point where they are allowed to dictate to me how my life should be conducted, nor to the point where a failure to amend my ways places my life in jeopardy.

      The differences between "the West" and "Militant Islamic Fundamentalists" are vast, but if you look through all of the superficial religious issues, you'll see that it all boils down to envy.

      Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, Al Queda... These are people that choose not to elevate themselves to the level found in other parts of the world, but rather to reduce the world to their own level.

    2. Re:sigh. by unitron · · Score: 2

      The Jews in World War II were in the same situation as the passeners and crew on the first three hijacked planes. They didn't know the real fate intended for them. The Jews thought they were going to work camps, the passengers thought they were going to be held as hostages for a while. If they had known exactly what awaited them their reaction would probably have been somewhat different.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  250. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  251. The Events You Equate Were Fudamentally Different by FreeUser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, so don't ever watch any specials about Hiroshima or the Bombing of Dresden either (which both had a LOT more casualties, almost all civilian). Oh, but these were Americans that were killed, so this is different...

    Yes it is different, but not for the asinine racist or bigoted reasons you so disingenuously imply.

    First, the insinuation that it is somehow common for Americans to value American lives over other lives is false and disingenuous. Media coverage does not equal people's attitudes. When I lived in Germany, the national news emphesized which Germans had been killed in such and such an event, just as American media emphesizes which Americans are killed in such and such an event. Ditto for the time I spent in Japan, in the UK, in Hong Kong, and in France. The Media always emphesizes the number of 'locals' killed in dramatic events, irrespective of whether those 'locals' are Americans, French, Germans, Chinese, or Japanese.

    However, none of the Germans I knew were any less horrified at the loss of non-German lives than they were with the German lives lost (remember the Concord?). Ditto for the UK, France, etc., and ditto for the United States

    Secondly, you are equating battles which took place against already belligerent enemies engaged in all out, no-holds barred world war, versus unprovoked attacks (by any reasonable definition, all "blame the victim" nonsense aside) during peacetime, such as Pearl Harbor and most especially the events of 9/11. This doesn't make the destruction of Heroshima, Nagasaki (forgot about them, didn't you?), and Dresden any less tragic or terrible, but it does mean they were fudamentally different in their nature and their context than the events of 9/11.

    So, while the civilian deaths of Heroshima and Dresden were terrible, that was war, waged against countries which were engaged in active hostilities against us and who, by the way, started the fucking thing to begin with. The World Trade Center, in contrast, was not. Equating the two, and drawing asinine conclusions like "Americans are bigots who care only for themselves" is fallicious both logically and ethically, and frankly you should be ashamed.

    The vast majority of us (aside from some fringe elements, of which every country has its fair share I might add) are horrified whenever we see death, be it American or otherwise. Why do you think we give so much of our money to try and alleviate famine, pestilence, and the ravages of wars we aren't even involved in in so many distant lands. Because, irrespective of our media or our government's behavior, we as a people do care about human life and are saddened by human suffering, irrespective of whether the people affected are American or not.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  252. How many more? by tenchiken · · Score: 2

    How many more people are going to die.

    By the Taleban, who wants the world to return the late 14th century. Wants Christians, Homosexuals, Hindu's, moderate Islamics, and anyone who disagrees with sharia to be put to death?

    What were the predictions of death before the US went in there due to starvation in Afganistan (irregardless of US bombs?) 7,500,000. People forget that we immediatly started food shipments as well into afganistan (and had already been providing more then a 3 million in aid even with Bin Ladin in sactuary in Afganistan).

    source: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2001/afg159.doc. htm

    Will we save them all? Probably not. Did we save most of them? Yes. That alone is a major step up.

    We have invested 689 Million dollors just into relief efforts.

    In general, if there is one criticism to be made in general from the Afgani war is that we did not take a active enough approach to it, and accidently killed people that the warlords "mis-identified".

    http://www.usaid.gov/hum_response/ofda/centralas ia _sr42_fy02.html

    Many millions more are going to the governments directly as well. Imagine how much worse it could have been if we had not gotten involved when we did.

    By Al-Qeda
    Al-Qeda has called for the re-establishment of a Celiphate as their main rallying call. In addition, Bin Ladin wants the relativly (anything is relative compared to Iran/Iraq/Syria) moderate government blodily overthrown.
    Al-Qeda contains many other organizations. On top of this list is the Lashkar Jihad which has been attempting to "purify" Indonesia by exterminating the Christians.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/77 02 63.stm
    3000 or more have died.

    Aceh Merdeka is responsible for more then 2000 deaths in Indonesia

    Want more? Go Here:
    http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/

    These groups will kill simply on the basis of ethnic, religous or political differences.

    Today they are being challanged.

    Hussain stands with Hitler as the only dictator to use WMDs against his own population (gassing). He has killed hudreds of thousands of political dissidents, and invaded two nearby countries in the last twenty years. He is activly persuing biological, nukes, and chemical weapons. Deployed WMD's for strike against Isreal in the Desert War in the early 90's but was dissuaded when the US government informed him that the response would be of "biblical proportions" should any WMD be used. Known to believe that Isreal's annilihation would be the key to unifying the Middle east.

    How many will die? Depends on weither we stop him before he nukes someone.

  253. Saw one of the planes on my way to work that day. by MERVERNATOR · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember that morning.. was on my wat to work in Westchester NY and was on 9A which parallells the Hudson for a bit... I dont remember the order of things, but I know I saw a plane swoop down kinda low,.. wobble back and forth a few times, and then go off at an odd angle... a plane never caught my attention like that as I was driving before, and since they did follow the Hudson as a guide, I just kinda have a feeling that it was one of them.. Was listening to Howard Stern that morning too... and when he broke in with the story, I remember the whole road came to a stop. I got to work and pictures and video were already flying through the network.. couldnt get a phone line for anything.. military jets and helecoptors just screamed over the area... days like that arent easy to forget, and they shouldnt be forgotten anyway.

  254. CNN big 9/11 news!!!! by sammaffei · · Score: 1

    "More NYC firefighters smoke since 9/11"

    http://www.cnn.com/2002/HEALTH/09/11/ar911.smoki ng .firefighters/index.html

    OK, have we just broad jumped over trivial and landed squarely on ludicrous.

    Jeeze, if I had to dig through blood soaked rubble trying to find whatever body parts of fallen comrades I could, I think I would need a smoke (or fifth of vodka or serious drugs).

    AOL Merger = Death of CNN

    --

    Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.

  255. Why it Happened + Double Standards in MidEast by duck_prime · · Score: 1
    The terrorists did this because...

    The US provides military hardware to Israel in its 50 year crusade to ethnically cleanse the "holy land" of Muslims and make that area a Jewish state with Jerusalem as it's capital. (This is called Zionism)
    I've always wondered why people bring this up, and never mention the mean and nasty things the Muslims of the area do. Try being non-Muslim in Saudi, Iran, (till recently) Afghanistan. It seems there is a double standard where Israel is expected to act as a "civilized, Western" nation, but such behavior is not expected of the Muslim nations all around, and they are not censured when they set a state religion, oppress religious minorities, oppress women, exhort holy war, etc.

    What's up with that?

    Anyway, what this is really about is that some fringe Islamist groups DISAPPROVE OF U.S. FOREIGN POLICY. That's it. If you think that this relatively tiny cabal should be able to set U.S. foreign policy, I don't know what to tell you.
    1. Re:Why it Happened + Double Standards in MidEast by mr100percent · · Score: 2

      You know, Muslims are supposed to tolerate other religions. Muhammad forbade anyone to attack Christians and Jews, unless in Self-defense.

      Look at the via dolarosa. Thousands of Christians go and walk the path that Jesus was said to have walked. It goes straight through the Muslim part of town, and I haven't heard of any problems.

      The Saudis, Iranians, and the Afghanis are a poor example of Islam. A real Islamic government is expected to treat minority religious groups fairly. Any oppression, of women or other religions is plainly wrong, which is why the governments aren't considered Islamic.

      What exactly are some of the nasty things the Muslims of the area do?

    2. Re:Why it Happened + Double Standards in MidEast by duck_prime · · Score: 1
      You know, Muslims are supposed to tolerate other religions. Muhammad forbade anyone to attack Christians and Jews, unless in Self-defense.
      Except that Muhammad *himself* led the first wars of islamic conquest, unifying the Arabian peninsula, and died while planning an unprovoked attack on Persia (also monotheists) and the Byzantine Empire. His immediate successors carried out these plans.

      Point being, Islam is a warrior's religion. Conquered Christians and Jews are to be tolerated, so long as they pay a special tax.

      Some quotes from the Koran:

      "Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends." (5:50)

      "And whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him." (3:85)

      "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth." (9:29)

      "Fight and slay the Pagans wherever you find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war." (9:5)

      "For the worst of beasts in the sight of Allah are those who reject Him." (8:55)

      "Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies." (8:60)

      "And slay them wherever you catch them... and fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be only for Allah." (2:193)

      "Fighting is enjoined on you, [even if it] is an object of dislike to you; and it may be that you dislike a thing while it is good for you, and it may be that you love a thing while it is evil for you, and Allah knows, while you do not know." (2:216)
    3. Re:Why it Happened + Double Standards in MidEast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's start with:
      suicide bombings that deliberately, specifically target civilians
      torture and immediate execution of so-called "collaborators"
      joyous celebrations in the street on 9-11 and the Scud missile attacks on Israel
      huge mobs continually chanting "Death to America" (NOT "Death to American Foreign Policy in the Mideast")
      I could go on, but you get the drift....

    4. Re:Why it Happened + Double Standards in MidEast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A person living by the maxim "what would Mohammad do" would be a nasty warmongering pedophile. Did you know Mohammad married a 6 year old girl when he was 53?

    5. Re:Why it Happened + Double Standards in MidEast by mr100percent · · Score: 2

      They are bad people who distort the true Islam.
      Would you say those Christians who:
      Bomb abortion clinics
      Picket funerals of gays
      Burn crosses in front of Black people's homes
      Blow up the Oaklahoma city building

      Are good examples of Christianity? No! Therefore I'm not going to generalize an entire religion just because of some people, I suggest you do the same with Islam.

    6. Re:Why it Happened + Double Standards in MidEast by mr100percent · · Score: 2
      Muhammad didn't lead any wars of conquest. Islam was NEVER spread by the sword, it is NOT a warrior's religion. The name "Islam" means both "peace" and "submission." I think you interpreted history wrong, let me clarify what you may or may not have read.

      History of Islam (briefly):
      Before Mohammad, Arabia was inhabited by Bedouins. Arabs were polytheists, and they worshipped a host of idols in the Ka'aba at Mecca. They had a number of unsavoury habits such as continual tribal warfare, and the burying alive of unwanted infant girls.

      Mohammed was born in 571 to a middle-class family. He was known as Al-Ameen, "the trustworthy" because of his spotless reputation. He was illiterate. In 610, Mohammad was sitting in a cave, and the angel Gabriel gave him a message from Allah. He was commanded to memorize all of his visions, as he was illiterate he could not write them down. He did so, and he began to gain followers by the force and quality of the words he recited. By 615, he had developed a large following in Mecca. His basic message was one of tolerance, kindness, belief in one God, respect for morality above and beyond tribal links, and prayer.

      As the ranks of his followers swelled, he became a threat to the local tribes, especially the Quraysh his own tribe whose responsibility it was to look after the Kaaba, which at this time was home to the several thousand idols that people worshipped as gods. As Mohammed preached against this pantheon he became deeply unpopular with the rulers and his followers suffered from repeated attacks to person and property. Eventually there was an assassination attempt, and he was forced to flee Mecca.

      Muhammad left the city, and emmigrated with many of his followers to the city of Medina. He declared a welfare state, collected taxes for the needy, organised town defences against numerous raiding parties from Mecca and beyond, and agreed numerous trade agreements. He built mosques, and established a religous culture based on personal respect for other religions (the town also contained Christians and Jews).

      After the repeated raid attempts on the town, Mohammad and his followers began to raid the raiders' caravans in retaliation and he distributed the treasure equally amongst his followers. By 627, Mohammad had united Medina under Islam with protected privileges for the Jews and Christians who lived there. Word of the new religion, with the peace and prosperity it brought spread by trade. The Bedouin became keenly interested in this new religion; they saw its potential to bring peace and plenty to their wandering tribes, and after much negotiation they became allies with Mohammed and after much contact with the town and muslims they gradually converted. At this stage the revelations that had been coming to Mohammed were almost complete, and he was told that he was to return to Mecca and reclaim the Kaaba. With negotiation and assent of the elders of the Quraysh he made an unarmed pilgrimage to the Kaba. This continued for a while but then the agreement broke down, and war was declared. But there was no bloodshed.In 630, 20 years after being forced to flee, Mohammad marched with an army of 10,000 followers back to Mecca, and the Meccans surrendered without a fight. He became a religious and political leader of the city. He destroyed all the idols in the Kaaba, and gave a general amnesty to all his enemies in the town.

      When Mohammad died in 622, he did not name a successor and left no sons. His advisors took over, and the next four leaders of Islam are known as the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs.

      My points:

      1. Islam is NOT spread by the sword. That myth was spread in the Middle Ages during the crusades. There are other legitimate ways to worship God, like Christianity and Judaism, so the "people of the book" are left alone. Forced conversion is strictly forbidden in the Koran.

      2. Conquered Christians and Jews lived side by side Muslims, with no problems. Look at the Moors in Spain. They were the Muslim rulers from 700-1400AD, and in that time, all three groups lived in peace and harmony; so much that the time is known as the "Golden Age of Judaism." The only thing the Muslims asked their fellow monotheists was to pay a tax, because the Islamic government collects taxes from all Muslims that go to welfare, and everyone else must do the same. To compensate, non-Muslims are exempt from any draft.

      3. For most of the last thousand years, the Muslim world was the forefront of science and arts, while Europe struggled with serfdom. Science, Math, architecture, and Medicine all grew. Free public hospitals, universities, even paved roads were common in Muslim lands.

      4. The Islamic political structure began as something akin to a representative democracy. Over time, as the empire crumbled through a few corrupt leaders and Mongol invasions. The crusades didn't help any, either.

      Now, let's address those verses from the Koran.

      "O you who believe! Take not for patrons unbelievers rather than Believers. (3:144)"
      The verse you used appears in numerous places in the Koran. You need to look at the verse in context; the other commandments and the rest of the Koran. No scholar would ever take one verse as guidance without making sure it's supported by the rest of the message. The rest of the Koran says to respect and tolerate fellow human beings and LOVE one another. I've given you a better verse to look at. It means don't make friends with atheists OVER friends with Muslims. If you're doing business, which person would you trust? The one concerned with only personal gain and no qualms about cheating you, or the person who lives by a moral code, and believes that God sees you doing something wrong?

      "And whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him....How shall Allah Guide those who reject Faith after they accepted it and bore witness that the Messenger was true and that Clear Signs had come unto them? but Allah guides not a people unjust." (3:85-86)
      You didn't read the verse after what you quoted. Muslims believe that the religion of Islam is the truth, with scientific proof supporting it. Now if you aren't born a Muslim, that's OK. If you're Christian or Jewish, that's fine. If you live and die never hearing about Islam, then you're innocent. But if you convert to Islam, then later on convert to some religion with idols or Hinduism, then you're doing something wrong. Why would a person swear that he believes in ONE God and Muhammad's message, then go join some polytheistic religion? (Hinduism technically IS monotheistic, but there are bigger differences) God helps everyone if you believe in Him and you pray. What the verse is telling you is that God isn't going to help you or guide you in any way if you turn away from him and start praying to Zeus.

      "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth." (9:29)
      This verse was revealed at a time when the Muslims were under serious attack by the Jewish tribes and pagans of the area. It was a necessary step that had to be taken as these groups were creating chaos in the Muslim world. When they were defeated they surrendered to avoid punishment, but when left alone they broke treaties and tried to assassinate Muhammad. This verse does not apply to the "people of the Book" (those who pray to the same God, like Jews and Christians). Like I said before, the Muslims in the government tolerate other religions. (Ignore Iran and Afghanistan, they follow a radical interpretation, and the rest of the Muslim world disagrees with them)

      "Fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. (9:5)"
      You are pulling sentences out of context. Shame on you for not including the rest of the verse, which makes it much more positive and forgiving than what you implied. Read the bolded part that you left out, or better yet, the entire chapter. First, the Muslims were commanded to fight against those infidels who violated the pledges and treaties and acted treacherously. Many people pretended to convert to Islam, just to get inside and cause havoc by trying to topple the religious leaders. Many scholars don't give this verse much weight, it was meant for the time when Islam was under attack in its early years. However, the verse isn't as violent if you look at the verses I'll show you after my rebuttal.

      "And slay them wherever you catch them... and fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be only for Allah."
      Man, who did you copy these from? This is completely out of context. What angers me is that you took this single fragment of a verse from a continent worth of peaceful verses. Let me correct you by including the entire section:
      "Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! Allah loveth not aggressors. And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Mosque until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers. But if they desist, then lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrong-doers."(2:190-193)
      Do you see where this is leading? It says in many other places to never fight except in self-defense. Don't start fights, but end them if you have to. If you have to fight in self-defense, then do it! Don't just stand there and wait for the other cheek to get slapped, try to prevent the first slap. BUT don't go over the limits and use that as an excuse to invade or attack. Islam has been about fighting for what's right, doing it with honor, and not hurting innocent people. Anyone who breaks that rule is committing a horrifying sin, including Osama Bin Laden.

      "Fighting is enjoined on you, [even if it] is an object of dislike to you; and it may be that you dislike a thing while it is good for you"(2:216)
      What can I say? Of course fighting is bad. Even if you hate it, sometimes you still have to do it. Islam is pacifist when it's right, but also smart enough to know when it's an obligation. Look at World War II, can you give me any reason why the US shouldn't have fought against Hitler?

      In conclusion, Islam is a religion that promotes family, tolerance, peace, respect of other religions, and love of one another. God loves you more than any parent could, so don't go against what He told you to do. Muslims are supposed to follow Jesus too, so love thy neighbor.

    7. Re:Why it Happened + Double Standards in MidEast by mr100percent · · Score: 2

      No, she was nine.

      I know, it sounds sorta gross from our 21st century Western Philosohpy, but at the time it was quite common practice. People got married when they hit puberty. Religion doesn't try to set an age limit on when marriage is permissible.

      Plus, he did it for political reasons. Aishah was the daughter of Abu Bakr, a close friend of Muhammad and part of a strong family in the area. She willingly consented to the marriage (forced marriage is forbidden in Islam), and Muhammad said an angel told him that she was the one.

      Each of Muhammad's marriages was done either for political reasons, to strengthen the ties of kinship or to help a woman in need.

      Islamic History and hadith reports them as having a very happy marriage, where they set an example on how a good marriage should work. They set an example of having no domestic violence and respect for each other.

    8. Re:Why it Happened + Double Standards in MidEast by nathanm · · Score: 2
      Islam was NEVER spread by the sword
      That is a bold-faced lie!

      With negotiation and assent of the elders of the Quraysh he made an unarmed pilgrimage to the Kaba. This continued for a while but then the agreement broke down, and war was declared. But there was no bloodshed.In 630, 20 years after being forced to flee, Mohammad marched with an army of 10,000 followers back to Mecca, and the Meccans surrendered without a fight. He became a religious and political leader of the city. He destroyed all the idols in the Kaaba, and gave a general amnesty to all his enemies in the town.
      After the submission of Mecca, two of the tribes were subdued by force, the Thaqif and Hawazin. To Mohammed's credit though, the surviving people of these tribes were treated well, and as a result eventually converted to Islam.

      1. Islam is NOT spread by the sword. That myth was spread in the Middle Ages during the crusades. There are other legitimate ways to worship God, like Christianity and Judaism, so the "people of the book" are left alone. Forced conversion is strictly forbidden in the Koran.
      The Quran may say it's forbidden, but there has been plenty of forced conversion to Islam. The Umayyad Empire spread Islam from North Africa to Central Asia largely through the use of force.

      2. Conquered Christians and Jews lived side by side Muslims, with no problems. Look at the Moors in Spain. They were the Muslim rulers from 700-1400AD, and in that time, all three groups lived in peace and harmony; so much that the time is known as the "Golden Age of Judaism." The only thing the Muslims asked their fellow monotheists was to pay a tax, because the Islamic government collects taxes from all Muslims that go to welfare, and everyone else must do the same. To compensate, non-Muslims are exempt from any draft.
      Their treatment in Spain was very different than in the Middle East under the Umayyad Empire.

      The tax, called the dhimmi, was much higher than any other people were taxed. Of course, they always gave the option of avoiding the dhimmi if you converted to Islam. For more information, see The Dhimmi: Jews and Christians Under Islam by Bat Ye'Or.

      Also, there wasn't really a draft as we understand the term. Most armies of the Islamic kingdoms and empires were basically mercenary armies of Turkic peoples like the Seljuks or Mamluks.

      Today the situation is much worse. Almost all Muslim-majority countries have little to no religious freedom and non-Muslims are heavily persecuted (usually government sanctioned or at least condoned).

      3. For most of the last thousand years, the Muslim world was the forefront of science and arts, while Europe struggled with serfdom. Science, Math, architecture, and Medicine all grew. Free public hospitals, universities, even paved roads were common in Muslim lands.
      During the Dark Ages in Europe, the Muslim world was at the forefront of science and philosophy, including the discovery and preservation of many original Greek manusripts and artifacts.

      However, Europe surpassed the Muslim world in the Renaissance and never looked back. Since then, the Muslim world has been a backwater, and is actually regressing in some areas. Any technology and development that exists there now is a product of the West. No major scientific or technological advances have come out of the Muslim world since the Middle Ages. (Muslims have come up with advances, but only while living in Western countries.) For more on this phenomenon see What Went Wrong: Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response, an excellent book by Bernard Lewis.

      4. The Islamic political structure began as something akin to a representative democracy. Over time, as the empire crumbled through a few corrupt leaders and Mongol invasions. The crusades didn't help any, either.
      There wasn't a Muslim-majority country with any sort of democratic government until after their colonizers left. For all its damage, colonization had some positive effects: they left in place modern infrastructure, technology, and institutions. Areas that weren't colonized, like the interior of the Arabian peninsula, were only developed with Western money after oil was discovered there.

      Besides, the fact they crumbled because of a few corrupt rulers demonstrates their system of government didn't work in the first place. The US has endured countless corrupt politicians and we're still the most powerful, prosperous, free nation in history. The reason for our resilience is a 200 some odd year old document called the US Constitution.
    9. Re:Why it Happened + Double Standards in MidEast by mr100percent · · Score: 2

      18. Was Islam spread by the sword?

      According to the Quran, "There is no compulsion in religion" (2:256), thus, no one can be forced to become a Muslim.
      Did some Muslims force religion? Yes. Did some Catholics force religion? Of course. The point is, there are bad followers, don't let them stain the religion.

      While it is true that in many places where Muslim armies went to liberate people or the land, they did carry the sword as that was the weapon used at that time. However, Islam did not spread by force because in many places where there are Muslims now, in the Far East like Indonesia, in China, and many parts of Africa, there are no records of any Muslim armies going there. To say that Islam was spread by the sword would be to say that Christianity was spread by guns, F-16's and atomic bombs, etc., which is not true.

      Christianity spread by the missionary works of Christians. Ten-percent of all Arabs are Christians. The "Sword of Islam" could not convert all the non-Muslim minorities in Muslim countries. In India, where Muslims ruled for 700 years, they are still a minority. In the U.S.A., Islam is the fastest growing religion and has 8 million followers here without anyone forcing them to be.

  256. How to properly honor the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the way that banner ads have been dropped from /. today. There is a small reminder about why there are no ads. What there is *not*, is a small reminder about who's decision it was to drop the ads.

    For example, when I opened my yahoo today, I get a big pop-under with an american flag. It seems like a nice tribute, until you see the brought-to-you-by-casino-on-net link at the bottom. If you really want to honor the day, you should go out of your way to take yourself out of the equation. It shouldn't be "look at me, I'm doing the right thing!", it should just be... the right thing.

    You will not get public acclaim for your actions, but that is exactly why those actions will succeed in their aim. Don't taint the day with greed.

  257. Terrorism? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    I live in a country that has had 'Terrorism' since before I was born.
    IMHO a terrorist attack is against civilians not against the state.
    Blowing up a army base is militant not terrorist. blowing up a school is terrorist.

    On 11/09/2001 there were 3 targets,
    the pentagon, camp David and the world trade centres.

    The pentagon and camp David are obviously legitimate military targets for a militant group.

    The groups associated with the attacks said they didn't have any problem with American people only the government (including the capitalist bodies in the US)
    It is therefore possible to view the world trade centre as a legitimate military target and the employees as agents of the state. the attacks then become military not terrorist.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Terrorism? by MoneyT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Terrorism is any act designed to cause fear or terror in a given group of people. It doesn't even have to be a violent motion, the simple act of waving a grenade arround in a crowd is an act of terrorism.

      The WTC attacks were acts of terrorism. And unlike a single plane crashing in tokyo (which one would assume is not being piloted by terrorists) the WTC attacks involved 4 planes intentionaly flown off course.

      As for millitary vs terrorism, even if you buy your definitions, what about all the civilians on the planes themselves? Or the civilians in the streets below? Are those also legitamte military targets?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:Terrorism? by asmussen · · Score: 1

      Even if you view the WTC as a legitimate military target (Which for the record, I don't personally), was the passenger plane they flew into it a legitimate military target?

      --
      Shawn Asmussen
    3. Re:Terrorism? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly america doesn't have a good record for not shooting down pasanger planes in the middle east, an eye for an eye and all that

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:Terrorism? by rediguana · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wrong wrong wrong. Check out what your law enforcement agency in charge of terrorism says. You'll note that it explicitly says 'the unlawful use of force and violence'. Waving a grenade around is not terrorism; it is threatening , will promote fear in the crowd, and probably illegal, but it is not terrorism. Now if they were to pull out the pin, throw it into the crowd, and claim to be doing it to promote a some agenda, then yes that would be terrorism. It doesn't become terrorism until a violent or forceful act takes place.

    5. Re:Terrorism? by overunderunderdone · · Score: 3

      The pentagon and camp David are obviously legitimate military targets for a militant group.

      Fine... Semantics. Then they are merely war criminals and just as reprehensible.

      It is therefore possible to view the world trade centre as a legitimate military target and the employees as agents of the state. the attacks then become military not terrorist.

      By this argument EVERYONE is an "Agent of the state" and a military target. Since there are no civillians in your accounting you would be fine if we stopped trying to avoid "civillian" deaths in war zones. I think the US should continue to try to avoid civilian deaths in war but it is good to see that you at least won't be protesting the occasional accident since there are no "civillians"

    6. Re:Terrorism? by gehel · · Score: 1

      Just my own two cents, but what about the thousand of Afghan/Irakian/... innocent civilian who died after the US fought back ? Are they "less innocent" than american civilian ? All the people that died from the US embargos, ... and so on

      What really makes the difference ?

    7. Re:Terrorism? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      well by that definition, the beating I gave to that idiot at the bar last night was terrorism... It was unlawful force and violence, right?

      -Chris

    8. Re:Terrorism? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Now, I hate to be the bearer of bad news here, but the Iraqi embargo is a UN, not a US embargo.
      Cuba on the other hand, I concede is a US monstrosity (as I think embargoes are in general). But stop blaming the US for every embargo and every kid who's dead because of one.

      You live in any UN member state, you TOO are responsible for dead children.

      -Chris

    9. Re:Terrorism? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I don't work for McDonalds, and I would never work for McDonalds(well maybe for a joke).. if you work at McDonalds expect people to give you shit and spit on you. If you don't want shit or don't like people spitting then DON'T FUCKING WORK AT McDONALDS.....

      If you don't want to die , don't work in a building or for a company that represents oppression to 2/3 of the world. Havn't you watched fight club latley?

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    10. Re:Terrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm.... no i don't think it counts if your beating your self up, no matter how hard you try your still not a terrorist.

    11. Re:Terrorism? by ROBOKATZ · · Score: 1
      Hmm. Well, I guess it's ok then.

      Moron.

    12. Re:Terrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeap, UN decided the embargo on Irak, but US where the only one who wanted to keep it ... Sorry for the bad news too ! (by the way, my country was NOT part of UN at that time, which was probably not a good thing. I can blame us because we didnt do anything against that ...)

    13. Re:Terrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess a few of your 'many corporate sponsors' must have got taken out, shame that your site could have been great with all that sponsorship.

    14. Re:Terrorism? by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2

      If you don't want to die , don't work in a building or for a company that represents oppression to 2/3 of the world.

      How this is different from saying "if you don't want to die don't profess belief in a religion that represents terrorism to 2/3 of the world"? Besides, the hijackers weren't exactly oppressed, they were a bunch of basically middle class or outright wealthy fascists who aren't against oppression as such, they're just frustrated that they aren't the ones doing it. I think a banker that wants to be repaid with interest on a loan YOU ASKED FOR is less oppressive than a Mullah who wants to subject everyone to sharia law relegating anyone who disagrees to dhimmitude.

      Havn't you watched fight club latley?

      Yes, I have. Interesting ENTERTAINMENT but a little unsatisfying (and shallow) as a political manifesto for anyone other than psychotics or dimwits that mistake it's psychotic rants for some kind of deep thought.

  258. the RIAA, the WIPO, the MPAA by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    Ok just off the top of my head, I'll give you some clues

    WIPO, think all the prople who die because of patents on drugs and the WIPO trying to wipe out clone productions.

    BUSH, I've got my finger on the button and it's twitching. enough said.

    RIAA,WIPO, There effectivly introducting a world where everything is licensed there fucking up contract laws and there probably lobying for hellish privicy laws the RIAA and WIPO are turning the world into a corporate state. fuck napster i can hum the songs if i want to copythem.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:the RIAA, the WIPO, the MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your mom still have her clitoris?

      Has your dad been shot in the back of the head and bulldozed into a mass grave?

      Has your junior high been drenched with nerve gas?

      No?

      Then shut the fuck up.

    2. Re:the RIAA, the WIPO, the MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Does your mom still have her clitoris?" no but she's brainwashed.

      "Has your dad been shot in the back of the head and bulldozed into a mass grave?" no but he's brainwashed

      "Has your junior high been drenched with nerve gas?" no but that's where they do the brainwashing.

      1: remove brain
      2: wash
      3: repeat

      opps somone forgot to put you through the rinse cycle now and then

  259. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by BinaryC · · Score: 1

    *every* religion believes in a god, some in multiple gods (even very non-christian "pagan" religions), and in every religion, it states that man does not determine who lives and dies, god does.

    If you can find me a religion that states man decides who lives and who dies, than I will eat my words.

    (btw, I don't consider atheism a religon. That's like calling anarchy a form of government)

    --
    Ne Quid Nimis - All things in moderation
  260. Taking an isolated event out of context and... by somethingwicked · · Score: 2

    Taking an isolated event out of historical context and...you have an excellent point to use during a debate.

    Look at the same point in context of WHO attacked who and your point suffers miserably...

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  261. End of the war by plopez · · Score: 2

    WWII, WWI had definite ends (surrender of Germany and Japan), the fighting was basically over at Appomatox (sp?) in the Civil War which lead to capitulation of the South (hold outs like Jesse James became outlaws), in Vietnam we gave up and pulled out. Korea is a fuzzy case, but the truce is still holding.

    THe problem with terrorism is the same as that of software bugs; how do you PROVE they have been completely defeated? How do we know what our political leaders and intelligence services are telling us about terrorism is correct, and not just a political ploy to get funding or win elections (or suspend or steal elections)?

    This is a scary position the US is in. I personally would take the extra risk and be a little less 'secure' from terrorists to keep a tight leash on the gov't.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  262. I may be a bastard, but... by flogger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm also a school teacher. I'm using the unit that I'm just starting and 9/11 to make some really powerful statements/accusations about our government.

    Today at our school is read-white-blue day. Well, I'm wearing my libertarian T-Shirt of the bill of rights (Void where prohibited by law).

    My classes are starting to read the Crucible (by Arthur Miller.) Many see it as an over-hyped play about the salem witch trials. However, it is a chronicle of how our country (always) seems to over-react to things that may be contrary: Witches, Africans, Commies, Aids Victims/Gays, Terorists, [insert other items here].

    The discussions so far today (I'm having my prep period now -- Probably I'll get reprimanded by the administration for using the computer for personal use. Side note: The district has gone Big Brother with computers and cameras (we are a small district in a town of 1500 people), and yes, big brother is here watching.) As I was saying...
    The discussions today have been remarkable. Students don't seem (at least by their comments - We're talking Juniors in high school here.) to want to live in a society that the government seems to be pushing us.

    Take Miller's Comment in the text of his play:
    It is impossible for man to organize his social life without repressions, and the balance has yet to struck between order and freedom.
    And throw in this AP story Anyway, I'm a bastard for talking bad about america at this moment. Hopefully, I'll still have a job tomorrow.

    al
    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
  263. This post... by andfarm · · Score: 1

    ...is a moment-of-silence post. Please use the below space for your personal remembrances.

    .
    .
    .
    .

    There. Don't you feel much better now?

    --

    TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

  264. I WOULD say something but by gelfling · · Score: 2

    The Widow Beemer has copywrited all words having to do with this event formerly known as nineeleven

  265. France also suffers by chainsawed · · Score: 0

    I am an american, and I mourn for the deaths of our victimized heroes. But I would also like to send my feelings to those in France who have lost loved ones due to flash floods. I can only hope that good will come of all this death and destruction.

  266. Pakistan, Saudi and terror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if it is just me.. but anytime I read about terror, two countries are invariably mentioned - Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

    Are they really innocent?

    1. Re:Pakistan, Saudi and terror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The taleban itself was a creation of pakistan and when they saw that their asses would be bombed they joined us, abeit reluctantly

  267. Archive by Prizm · · Score: 1

    Everybody's got their own way of dealing with the situation. I wouldn't say that turning off banner ads are saving the world, but it's a nice gesture.

    On another note, The 'way back machine' at archive.org has archives from September 11th, for those interested. It's interesting to go back to CNN.com and read the reports.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20010911203610rn_2/ww w. cnn.com/?

    Poke around and see what interesting things you can find.

  268. Re:Any new ideas for the Israel vs Palestine probl by SablKnight · · Score: 1

    The only other option I can think of is to pull out entirely, give no support at all to either side, and let them kill each other off.

    It's that, or the glass parking lot solution that was mentioned above.

    SablKnight

  269. violence begets violence by throatmonster · · Score: 1

    not much else to say, really... only when everyone realizes how horrible violence and war is, will we ever begin to see peace.

    --
    All pass beyond reach of medicine. None pass beyond the reach of love.
    1. Re:violence begets violence by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But good luck trying to convince the whole world at once, because that's what you'd have to do. Sure it'd be nice if we in the western world were peace mongers, but others aren't. You can be damn sure they'll take advantage of that fact as well.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
  270. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And as far as I'm concerned, captial punishment is more humane than life in prison with no chance of parole. Nothing but you, the four walls around you, and your thoughts.

    One of the many reasons that I am opposed to capital punishment.

    No, I am not the person you were responding to, just my $0.02

  271. just comments by memnock · · Score: 1

    a year ago today, i was in the Grand Canyon, nearly stung by a scorpion that somehow got in my tent. did find out about what happened until 2 days later, coming up one of the trails. i stopped and took a break and someone told me and all i could do was sit there and try to believe what he said. "on vacation", i had a hard time understanding that life could go on, down such treacherous paths.
    been reading the comments and thinking about other columns i have read. i don't want to repeat everything that has been said, but to rehash one thing: saying that people are innocent (i am NOT reffering to those who died in the attacks) is incorrect, i think. naive is more appropriate. the U.S. govt(as a puppet for U.S. corporations). uses other means than military might to stomp on other people/countries. as for military power, another poster said that Iraq has enough chemical weapons to destroy the world 3X over. the U.S. has power to do the same. where is the concern about the U.S.? especially since GWB is bent on stopping terrorists wherever they may hide?
    how have i changed? no discernible way. the U.S.? other than being a security conscious? i can't figure out how. i haven't seen many more volunteers in the places i volunteer. still trash everywhere. where i live, the same acrimonious political races (only primaries!). i got back from 4 months travelling in S America 5 days ago and it was the same crass commercialism i have seen since i have been able to identify it as such. The people there were friendly, but they have crime and in some places, bombings. Most of the time, no one even thought to mention what happened here.

  272. I thought the point of 11 september... by heyeq · · Score: 1

    ...was the violent protestation of both democracy AND capitalism.

    Can someone explain to me why sites have been shut down, and banner ads removed (not just here, but all over the show)? Have the terrorists achieved their goal, and shut down (or even severely limited) capitalism, even if only for one day or a few hours, by flying into the towers a year ago?

  273. Longest year in my life. by berniecase · · Score: 1

    So, I just turned 24 last month, and I must say that the distance between 9/11/01 and 9/11/02 has been, without a doubt, the longest year in my life.

    The morning of 9/11, I got out of bed and stood next to the bed (I go to work at 5am) just thinking to myself how much I didn't want to go to work that day, and how tired I was. I must have stood there for at least 5 minutes, while my girlfriend slept. I eventually caved in to my own internal arguments and went to work.

    I was at work in Seattle, on the 36th floor of an office building downtown when the attacks occurred. I remember being the only person who could get a decent video stream of what was going on, and from the BBC no less. I remember laughing and joking about the attacks at first, but then things became very solemn when my boss came over and said he had friends at WTC.

    I then remember leaving at about 9am PDT and then walking in the shadow of the Bank of America Tower (73-stories, which is big for this side of the country). It was an eery feeling going home so early in the day. I watched CNN the rest of the day, and then took the day off the next day to watch more.

    I didn't cry about the attacks until I watched a PBS special last night called America Heroes, about two FDNY fire companies who lost a bunch of their brothers in the attacks. I lost it a couple times watching those guys talking about what happened.

    I remember going to an AMD Athlon XP event at Westlake center, weeks after the attacks. It was really early in the morning, and there were about 2500 people packed into Westlake Center/Park, all there to win a motherboard/Athlon combo. We weren't there for the marketing spiel. But anyway, as we're standing there, a lone 747 flies overhead. This is a normal thing, but every head in the place was watching it. It was just strange.

    I'm so glad it's a year later. It's time to move on. It's time to rebuild our lives and our way of life. It's time to change government so that things like this don't happen in the future.

    I can't find a better ending, but I'm just glad that we've survived in the past year. I hope we continue to.

    1. Re:Longest year in my life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're just pissed cause you didn't get that Athlon. Admit it. And get over it, cause in two years people will be throwing them away to get the newest. I mean, it's true that AMD makes the fastest and sweetest CPU's in the world, but hey, it's just a computer.

  274. George W. Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, I see people ripping on Bush left and right about everything that he does, but I pose a question to all of you who would do this:

    Could Gore do any better?

    I mean, sure, he did invent the internet and all, but that's no big deal ;)

    Given that Bush is obviously a mental midget, he seems to actively seek the opinions of people who are far more intelligent. Being able to aknowledge your own stupidity and seek help is a great feat. I feel that it troubled times, as we're in now, what is best for the entire nation is for us to rally our support behind the president. We need to unite as a people and stand up for what we believe as a whole.

    -CODEmage

  275. Amateurs to Remember 9/11; join the Global Linkup by pa3gvr · · Score: 1

    From the ARRL website:

    The effort, called the Commemorative 9/11 Net, is being spearheaded by Len Signoretti, N2LEN, of Brooklyn, New York. N2LEN's 440.050 MHz (CTCSS 114.8 Hz) internet-linked repeater covers the Greater New York City area. The linkup will rely on either EchoLink or eQSO Internet software connections. Signoretti said his UHF machine is used as a central hub to coordinate EchoLink and eQSO, so users on each can communicate. The net will attempt to interconnect repeaters in all 50 US states as well as in many other countries around the world.

    Amateurs can download free EchoLink or eQSO software from the Internet. While there is no listen-only capability on the Internet, many local VHF and UHF repeaters are expected to take part in the commemorative linkup.

    The Commemorative 9/11 Net is scheduled to get under way at 8 PM Eastern Daylight Time (0000 UTC September 12) on the EchoLink and eQSO servers and could run as long as two hours. Haynie (ARRL President) is scheduled to address the cyberspace and RF-linked gathering at around 9 PM EDT.

  276. The miltary can't fight terrorism. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2

    It's a fundamental fact that the US seems to have missed entirely. Bush just doesn't get it at all, I guess that's why he's now after Iraq, it's a real country that can be defeated by the military, I suppose it's something he can understand, nevermind that it won't have any effect on terrorist networks other than to stir them up.

    He's sent in the B52s, the marines, the helicopter gunships, the fighter bombers, the cruise missiles and to give them their dues, they did blow up some $50 tents.

    Like sand in the wind, they vanished. But Al Quaeda still exists, still infiltrating countries, still making plans, stockpiling weapons, pushing it's agenda, inspiring the faithful.

    Terrorists work from within their target populations. They are the guy down the street. The military is the wrong tool to deal with him and you can't make war on your population.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:The miltary can't fight terrorism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *You can't make war on your population.*

      Wanna bet?

      AC

  277. Chomsky's view available on BBC by cliveholloway · · Score: 1
    and can be found here

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  278. The fine line of privacy by s33z3r** · · Score: 1
    I'm all for the protection of American rights - it's what this country is founded on and makes our country the best on the planet. But, where does one draw the line?

    Zacharious(sp) - the 12th hijacker - was detained in Detroit days prior to Sept 11th. He had a laptop that the FBI wanted to analyze but was denied request by the courts. This may have provided the necessary info the prevent these horrible attacks. The government must have the ability to perform necessary intelligence activities to provide adequate protection.

  279. Religion vs. Spiritualism by Perrin-GoldenEyes · · Score: 2

    The emphasis on religion instead of spirituality is fairly strong evidence of your narrow-mindedness. IMO, religion as such is totally meaningless. It exists solely to support spirituality. And I do consider atheism a form of spirituality, but I suppose that's debatable. As for stating who lives or dies, I don't necessarily agree with you. I mean obviously it can't be totally arbitrary, but I believe that God understands that we can't just allow people to get away with murdering almost three thousand people. God takes care of His/Her house; we take care of ours.

    --
    -Perrin.
    Now I want you to go in that bag and find my lightsaber. It's the one that says bad mother-fscker on it.
    1. Re:Religion vs. Spiritualism by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      ---And I do consider atheism a form of spirituality, but I suppose that's debatable.---

      It sure is. An atheist might or might not have spirituality, but it is not because of his atheism, nor is it "atheist" spirituality. It is HIS spirituality, plain and simple, or the spirituality of some other view or belief. Atheism simply means lack of belief in gods: it isn't a positive affirmative position on which to build or further classify positive positions.

  280. Go out and do *something* to better your world by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 1

    After much thought, I've realized that my life HAS changed a bit over the past year. After the attacks, I felt the need to simply do *something* positive to counteract all the negative things that were bombarding me. I've written my representatives in congress on various issues. I've gotten involved in my community. I've contributed money to various opensource projects. I tell my family I love them more regularly than before. I VOTED yesterday in the gubernatorial primary election.

    Take *ownership* of the problems you see. If you don't like the way things are being handled, do something about it. Of course, I'm not asking that you hurt anyone in the process! But it's YOUR country, not the government's. There are plenty of *positive* things you can do to make a noticeable difference in your next of the woods.

  281. Here in Dublin by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Your lucky the UK government didn't bomb Ireland flat. unlike what the UK and US governments done to Afghanistan and plan to do to Iraq.

    those who forget history are doomed to repeat it?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Here in Dublin by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      Not really - the Republic does not condone the violence in the North, and imprisons and extradites terrorists, unlike the Taliban.

    2. Re:Here in Dublin by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      Here's how it works

      gerry adams (who many belive to be political) was in Eira and the UK government wanted to put him on trial in the UK because of a nail bombing in brixton. because Sien Fain? in terrorist and he's the leader of Sien Fain.

      You refuse because but say he can goto another catholic country to be tried.

      The UK government says your not playing fair and that the your goverment is allied with gerry adams and also terrorist, they then bomb the fuck out of your country.

      Now this would have to have happened a few years ago but it's not that far from what the US have done.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:Here in Dublin by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      Sinn Fein is a legal political both in Ireland and the United Kingdom. The Provisional IRA is an illegal para-military organisation in both Ireland and the United Kingdom, although membership does not currently result in imprisonment as a result of the Good Friday Agreement and the continuing ceasefire.
      Membership of the "Real" or "Continuity" IRA continues to be an imprisonable offence in both countries. If, as you suggest, a member of this organisation detonated a bomb in the UK, and was captured in the Republic Ireland, he would most certainly be extradited to the UK. I have never heard of Ireland insisting of extraditing people to a Catholic country instead of a secular one.

      btw - when you are communicating in English, the country's name is Ireland. Eire is only used in Gaelic.

    4. Re:Here in Dublin by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Sinn Fein is a legal political.

      Why did they prevent me from hearing anything gerry adams had to say for so many years then?

      Eire is I believe the name of the island or at least that's what i had beat into me at school...

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    5. Re:Here in Dublin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or as they are loving referred to, Sinn Fein/IRA :)
      Also known as that murdering bunch of utter sub-human monkeyfuckers. Just cuz we love them so.
      Not that the Loyalist assfuckers are much better.
      What a shite hole of a country this place is.

  282. Jan 26, 2001 EARTHQUAKE KILLS 13000 by barureddy · · Score: 1

    STATED IN ANOTHER POST.

  283. Sept 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Certainly this day was a tragic event. And I certainly don't intend to take anything away from the innocent victims and heroes of this day. But the words of Don Henley's "Dirty Laundry" are ringing in my ears about now. I wish the media d respected this day and treat it with the reverence it deserves.
    (I listened to an network reporter describe Flight 93 this A.M. "The flaming fireball that left a crater approx 150 feet wide and 40 feet deep...." All he missed is the "...Spewing body parts everywhere reference"
    Geeze..Have some respect for the relatives and friends of these people. Sensationalized television at its best.

  284. minor nitpick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>May 6th (1937) The Hindenburg Disaster : 35 dead due engineering error (Hydrogen v. Helium). The Hindenburg had cared hundreds of passangers thousands of miles before this happened.

    Actually, it was due to the skin of the dirigible being coated with the equivalent of rocket fuel (iron and aluminum powders). A buildup of static electricity created a spark that jumped from the metal frame to the skin. The rest is history.

  285. civilians on the planes by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    To some it may appear that way,

    US shot down passenger plane

    There's a lot of good stuff on plane hijacking and the locaby bombing.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:civilians on the planes by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is so ridiculous. If any terrorist group has a problem with the US government they can attempt a coup. Personally, I think it's about time for a change of government, although I don't want to see Afganistan's form of government here. Laisez faire capitalism or just plain anarchy would be nice though. I'd even fight for that and risk my life and all.

      But blowing up a couple of tall buildings full of civilians is just plain stupid. It accomplishes nothing. Just senseless murder, like the work of a serial killer for instance. The killing of civilians always accomplishes nothing. If you want to overthrow a government, you need to defeat(or convert)its armed forces. There is no other way. So called "terrorism" is useless. I agree that the Pentagon and Camp David *are* valid military targets to an enemy. You're right about that not really being "terrorism". But most of the deaths were in the trade center. They screwed up with the military targets.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    2. Re:civilians on the planes by Simplulo · · Score: 1

      >Personally, I think it's about time for a change of government,
      >although I don't want to see Afganistan's form of government here.
      >Laisez faire capitalism or just plain anarchy would be nice though.

      To honor the victims of 9/11 we should do what we can to prevent more such tragedy, by asking why did it happen in the first place. The terrorists struck because they hate the US, and they hate the US not because of what it is or represents (contrary to whatever nonsense Bush says for the cameras) but because the US is meddling in the Middle East. If you poke a rabid dog enough times, it will bite you, civilian or not.

      We libertarians often say that the ideal state would have the personal freedom of the Netherlands, the economic freedom of Hong Kong, and the neutrality of Switzerland. Such a state would not provoke such an attack.

      >I'd even fight for that and risk my life and all.

      Then consider joining us:
      http://www.FreeStateProject.org

  286. Reflection and Concern by m11533 · · Score: 1

    The events of 9/11/2001 have very definitely changed my life. I grew up a New Yorker and have lots of family and friends who still live and work in the area. Thus, as I woke up here on the West Coast a year ago today and got a phone call from my girl friend to quick look at the TV, my first thought was of what family members and friends were in those buildings. I could not turn away from that TV screen. I kept hearing in my mind... I must watch this until every detail is forever etched into my mind so that I NEVER FORGET.

    I was very fortunate. None of my family was actually in the World Trade Center that day, though one had plans to be there later that day. None of my friends were there either. But there were definite personal connections to those who died that day. The friend of my friend. The sister of my daughter's coach who was a flight attendant on one of the planes. So today I sit at my desk and try to work (I have a new job, I have no sick time, leave, or vacation to take off), I remember what happened to these people.

    I also remember how I worried how the opportunists would exploit this tragedy. It seems today that I was rightly concerned. One is still attacked as un-American for questioning the actions of our President. Yet, I do not believe we are any safer today than we were one year ago. Though we very definitely are less free. The "war" continues, with no way of ever knowing when it is over. The battles are secret. The enemy unknown. We get told that we must kill people in Iraq to make the world safe, and while I do believe there is some risk there, I do not buy the argument that there is any relationship between Iraq and their quest for new weaponry and the tragedy in NY and DC... certainly less than that between oil money going to the Middle-Eastern countries. I see exploitation of this tragedy at every turn. Commercial. Political. Ethical. Religious. Everyone is trying to take advantage of the moment, of the desire to do something, anything, to respond to it when there IS no response that makes any sense.

    We need to see all of the evidence of those responsible for the events of one year ago. We need to see all of the actions taken in response. We need to respect the founding principals and freedoms of our unique nation and realize that it is easy to be free during good times, it is harder during bad, yet it is the consistency of freedom during all times that makes our nation the United States of America.

  287. "DO NOT FORGET" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "DO NOT FORGET"

    I sat in a movie theater watching "Schindler's List," asked myself, "Why didn't the Jews fight back?"

    Now I know why.

    I sat in a movie theater, watching "Pearl Harbor" and asked myself, "Why weren't we prepared?"

    Now I know why.

    Civilized people cannot fathom, much less predict, the actions of evil people.

    On September 11, dozens of capable airplane passengers allowed themselves to be overpowered by a handful of poorly armed terrorists because they did not comprehend the depth of hatred that motivated their captors.

    On September 11, thousands of innocent people were murdered because too many Americans naively reject the reality that some nations are dedicated to the dominance of others. Many political pundits, pacifists and media personnel want us to forget the carnage. They say we must focus on the bravery of the rescuers and ignore the cowardice of the killers. They implore us to understand the motivation of the perpetrators. Major television stations have announced they will assist the healing process by not replaying devastating footage of the planes crashing into the Twin Towers.

    I will not be manipulated.

    I will not pretend to understand.

    I will not forget.

    I will not forget the liberal media who abused freedom of the press to kick our country when it was vulnerable and hurting.

    I will not forget that CBS anchor Dan Rather preceded President Bush's address to the nation with the snide remark, "No matter how you feel about him, he is still our president."

    I will not forget that ABC TV anchor Peter Jennings questioned President Bush's motives for not returning immediately to Washington, DC and commented, "We're all pretty skeptical and cynical about Washington."

    And I will not forget that ABC's Mark Halperin warned if reporters weren't informed of every little detail of this war, they aren't "likely -- nor should they be expected -- to show deference."

    I will not isolate myself from my fellow Americans by pretending an attack on the USS Cole in Yemen was not an attack on the United States of America.

    I will not forget the Clinton administration equipped Islamic terrorists and their supporters with the world's most sophisticated telecommunications equipment and encryption technology, thereby compromising America's ability to trace terrorist radio, cell phone, land lines, faxes and modem communications.

    I will not be appeased with pointless, quick retaliatory strikes like those perfected by the previous administration.

    I will not be comforted by "feel-good, do nothing" regulations like the silly "Have your bags been under your control?" question at the airport.

    I will not be influenced by so called,"antiwar demonstrators" who exploit the right of expression to chant anti-American obscenities.

    I will not forget the moral victory handed the North Vietnamese by American war protesters who reviled and spat upon the returning soldiers, airmen, sailors and Marines.

    I will not be softened by the wishful thinking of pacifists who chose reassurance over reality.

    I will embrace the wise words of Prime Minister Tony Blair who told Labor Party conference, "They have no moral inhibition on the slaughter of the innocent. If they could have murdered not 7,000 but 70,000, does anyone doubt they would have done so and rejoiced in it?

    There is no compromise possible with such people, no meeting of minds, no point of understanding with such terror. Just a choice: defeat it or be defeated by it. And defeat it we must!"

    I will force myself to:

    -hear the weeping
    -feel the helplessness
    -imagine the terror
    -sense the panic
    -smell the burning flesh
    - experience the loss
    - remember the hatred.

    I sat in a movie theater, watching "Private Ryan" and asked myself, "Where did they find the courage?"

    Now I know.

    We have no choice. Living without liberty is not living.

    -- Ed Evans, MGySgt., USMC (Ret.)
    Not as lean, Not as mean, But still a Marine.

    Keep this going until every living American has read it and memorized it so we don't make the same mistake again.

  288. Both by renehollan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I personally feel we are continuing to provoke such things through our economic agenda, and that what bush's policy has been shortsighted and really retro-active. Others feel that the world climate is changing for the worst, and we simply need to start protecting ourselves more. What do you think?

    Both.

    When I was a small child, I was taught to not approach the cute little bear cubs that would sometimes wander close to my parent's vacation home in the spring time. Yes, it was our property, and yes, bears can be destructive, but the cub was doing what cubs do, which, in and of itself, was not harming anything. Mama bear, of course, was expected to be close behind.

    So it is when dealing with the affairs of others. OBL attacked the U.S. ostensibly because of American presence in Saudi Arabia, which he repeatedly denounced.

    Executive Summary: When your government, put in place either through your winning electoral choice, or your acceptance of a democratic process pisses someone off, you increase your risk of dying.

    Right or wrong, heinous or noble, justified or not -- such words vulnerable to the winds of propaganda matter didly squat to your corpse rotting at the bottom of a pile of rubble.

    So, you must chose carefully, those acts in which you, or your representatives engage, for you will be faced with the burden of defending against their consequences. This does not mean that one should cower and hide in the face of those who disagree with what you believe are your rights, but it does mean you should pick wisely when chosing what's worth risking death at the hands of those you enrage.

    Somehow, I have a hard time believing any sane American who values his or her freedoms would accept that U.S. interests in Saudi Arabia were worth the loss of some 3000 lives or the liberty-suspending measures purported to to be able to prevent such a loss in the future.

    Sometimes, it IS better to let the bully have his corner of the sandbox -- if you're willing to fight him lest he cross some arbitrary line in the dirt, let him pick the line and see if it is all that unreasonable. Then you can defend both your turf and the moral high ground.

    P.S. You know, as an aside, I chuckle about the semantic hack OBL pulled: the U.S. can't declare "war" war against an individual, only a nation, and so can't legally muster the "war-mode" enabling powers it otherwise could. Yet it clearly faces a situation that any sane person would clearly interpret as an "act of war". Heh, doublespeak bites the usual government mouthpiece on the ass. I'll leave it to the gentle reader to decide whether that's adding insult to injury or poetic justice, dripping in bloody irony.

    --
    You could've hired me.
  289. Forgot Kent State by Stiletto · · Score: 2

    May 4, 1970: US National Guard troops open-fire on unarmed college students, killing four. Not a natural disaster or engineering malfunction. This was mass-murder.

  290. Protecting 'freedom' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    > I think America is underestimated because
    > outsiders view freedom of religion, freedom of
    > speech, tolerance of different opinions,
    > and open debate as a sign of disunity.
    > Americans agree to disagree, and are
    > passionate about defending the
    > freedoms that allow such diversity.

    As a New Zealander (an 'outsider') living in the US, two thoughts come to mind when I here patriotic rhetoric like this..

    The first is that Americans talk a lot about their supposed freedom and democracy, but to my experience I am no freer than back home or in most European countries, and the government is definitely less democratic.

    To me there is little 'open debate' in America on the issues that really matter. Like why in a supposed 'democracy' and such a multi-ethnic society most of the Govt is made up of rich middle aged to elderly white men. In other countries such as NZ the govt although dominated by the same but seems much more representative - our last two Prime Ministers have been women and we have had a Rastafarian and a transsexual as members of Parliament. In the US why is it that the government is so obviously controlled by big business, and noone is asking what can be done about it? What is wrong with the process that can result in an obvious simpleton like George Bush becoming President? Where is the 'open debate' you are talking about, it's certainly not in the mainstream press.

    One thing stifling open debate in American seems to be a very misguided sense of partriotism. Why is that people who question the Bush administration's foreign policy are often called
    'un-American' (or 'partisan'). Shouldn't criticism of the Government's policy be a *healthy* thing. I know that if you used the term 'anti-New Zealand' back at home to describe anyone people would just laugh at you. Back in Stalinist Russia being 'anti-Russian' was one of the worst crimes imaginable, but to my knowledge the concept doesn't exist in countries outside the US. Wouldn't a real patriot (a person who really loves America) want to fix the things that are wrong?

    (As an aside the level of blind patriotism in America is quite scary to an outsider like myself. Definitely a meme-set that is very much like religion, taught to children early (pledge of Allegence etc) and subtly enforced via the media).

    America seems do a lot of dubious things in the world in the name of protecting their freedom and democracy. How exactly was bombing Afganistan protecting America's freedom? You can do anything you want in the name of protecting your freedom!

    It is that outsiders unestimate American's desire to protect their freedom, or is that they underestimate the American people's ability to be fooled by their Govt into thinking that that is what they are doing?

  291. Thanks by bee · · Score: 2

    Since no one else has stepped forward yet, let me be the first to say thank you for your efforts.

    Even though your servers are often used to express opinions that you disagree with, or even find revolting.

    Even though there are probably many times when it doesn't seem worth the effort.

    Even though you and your staff sometimes seem to be the most criticized people on here, after Bill Gates anyways.

    Keep up the good work. We all appreciate it, even if it isn't said very often.

    --
    At least mafia-owned pizzarias make excellent pizza. Compare to Bill Gates.
  292. Praise for /. staff. by geekoid · · Score: 2

    As the events that happened shocked the world, and as most of us were to stunned to do anything productive, the /. staff busted there backs to keep us informed.
    While we, the /. readers and posters, loaded there system with posts of sorrow, rage, and confusion, they found ways to get around the technicall problems, to keep us updated.

    I, like many readers, have had my issues with /., but I will always remember who kept me informed.

    To the staff at /., I salute you.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  293. I Learned of the Attack from Slashdot by cosmicpossum · · Score: 1
    I had just finished coding a module and came up for air with a Slashdot break. I saw the article and then tried to get news from other places on the web.

    I turned on the radio and heard of the second tower hit. Then it was off to a television for the rest of the day.

    --
    (This sig intentionally left blank)
  294. And so it begins.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, the respect for the loss of a year ago today, will be overshadowed by the prospects of what will begin tomorrow.

    Bush seems to be using today to retouch the wound and regenerate the anger so that he can begin his war with Iraq. Currently, he admits there are no direct ties to 9/11, although he is certainly searching. The timing of his speech to the UN should not be lost on anyone.

    Most of the evidence he is using is based on a rationale that since Iraq may have been trying to acquire weapons previously and that we haven't beat up on him in a while to stop them, well they must have been doing more. By that logic, the US can go after just about any country in the world in the name of terrorism. Russia and China have these weapons and now that they have direct connections with Iran / Iraq, they by definition support terrorists, right?

    While public opinion can be drummed up in the name of patriotism, the US will continue going to war. It is after all, the only economic policy that the Bush family knows.

  295. One good thing about rail storms in S. France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . it is the ONLY time the streets and sidewalks are clear of dog shit.

    Not trolling, just speaking the truth. In some cities they have a Arab or African riding around on a little moped with sort of vacuum cleaner on it that he can use to suck up the shit, and it goes into a little transparent container so everyone can see it as he drives around.

    If you travel from Dover to France and South, man you can tell you are getting closer to Africa every step of the way.

  296. None taken, but.... by ArthurDent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I understand your point. I, too, think sometimes memorials can be overdone. There's one thing to remember here. Even though you were one of the ones most directly affected, you are not alone. Everyone in the country was affected by the loss of innocence that results from being attacked for the first time on the soil of the contiguous states. Thousands of people lost family members. Millions (probably) lost friends and neighbors and co-workers. That kind of pain does not go away lightly.

    There are always going to be jerks who try to profit off the emotions of others. Live with it. That doesn't mean that the memorials are worthless. It's a milestone for us to examine how the event changed us and decide if we like what we find.

    Ben

  297. Am I the only one? by The+Slashdolt · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one who gets that feeling in their stomach every time slashdot is down or is slow to respond. I mean, besides that fact that it's delaying my fix, but that there could be a lot of sudden traffic that could be indicative of another major event? Every time I click to load or reload slashdot and it is delayed, I get a little worried. Am I the only one who does this?

    --
    mp3's are only for those with bad memories
    1. Re:Am I the only one? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Not me, not with Slashdot at least. :) I'm used to it occasionally having bouts of slowness. I get worried when CNN doesn't load for a long time though.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
  298. I find 9/11 very disturbing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it ironic that some of the most educated people still believe in some sort of fantasy that everyone died to protect freedom in the US. What freedom? The freedom to wreak havok in most of the known world by our military over the last century? Get your facts straight people. Now our government wants to go charging into Iraq, I guess none of us learned our lesson from 9/11/01? We should stop f*ing with the world and realize that they will hurt is back.

    1. Re:I find 9/11 very disturbing... by sammaffei · · Score: 1

      Run and hide / make nice... ...a popular and depressing sentiment in this thread today. With statements like this, we're already beaten.

      --

      Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.

  299. Is it really so bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... has anyone that was _not_ a terrorist or at least suspicious ever been detained because of these laws? Has there ever been any false arrests? I doubt it...

    Most of these laws state clearly that you must be suspect of actual "terrorism." So unless you are actually doing suspicious things (such as DoS, domestic terrorism, and the like), there is little to worry about (unless you think the US will turn into some kind of Nazi\Fascist _just_ because of this invasion of privacy.... I think not).

    1. Re:Is it really so bad? by aronc · · Score: 1

      ... has anyone that was _not_ a terrorist or at least suspicious ever been detained because of these laws? Has there ever been any false arrests? I doubt it...

      Several that we know of already, if you keep up with CNN. Who knows how many we don't know about.. that's part of the big problem here. People are still being held without access to the outside world. No judges, no lawyers, nothing. The administration doesn't let anyone in the public see their reasons or their evidence either. Dubya and his underlings have decided they have the sole authority to determine who is a suspect, and what they do with them when they catch them. This is a BAD THING(TM).

      --

      jello.
      aka aron.
    2. Re:Is it really so bad? by Yunzil · · Score: 2

      ... has anyone that was _not_ a terrorist or at least suspicious ever been detained because of these laws? Has there ever been any false arrests? I doubt it...

      Well, there's no way to know for sure, now is there? If they keep someone locked up in secret with no trial or legal representation, how would we (the public) ever find out if they were a terrorist or not?

  300. Sometimes evil just needs to be destroyed by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2

    I'm amazed at the yellow-bellied reposnses I see here today. You're desperately hoping that if you just extend an olive branch to these people that they'll leave you alone.

  301. Wrong number of stripes? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2

    Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that the flag icon for this subject only has 12 stripes?

    People seem to have an amazing amount of trouble with this... I've seen several flag stickers on cards that have 14 stripes, have the stripes in the wrong order, have a totally tweaked aspect ratio, and so on.

    1. Re:Wrong number of stripes? by tuffy · · Score: 1
      Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that the flag icon for this subject only has 12 stripes?

      If you zoom in on it, it's clear there's specks of red above the topmost white stripe. Thus, it seems the thirteenth stripe was a casualty of the cropping process. I'm more annoyed that the icon is a gif rather than a png...

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  302. Tom Pittman's Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those of you who remember the early days of microcomputers might remember a fellow named Tom Pittman, who developed Tiny BASIC and made it available dirt-cheap for several platforms... this in contrast to a whiny young Bill Gates, who at the time was harassing computer hobbiests (such as those in the famous Homebrew Computer Club) to cough up unreasonable amounts of money for his BASIC interpreter, which, in some respects, wasn't as good as Tiny. Later, Pittman became known for writing a HyperTalk compiler for the Mac and authoring "The Art of Compiler Design: Theory and Practice" --- still a damn fine book, if you can find a copy.

    What does this have to do with 9/11? Less well known is that Pittman is a devout Christian, who's spent a good chunk of these last few years living off his savings to develop automated Bible translation software. He's an interesting person, and whether or not you subscribe to the Christian belief system, his thoughts on the events of 9/11 make for some thought-provoking reading:

    http://homepage.mac.com/BibleTrans/IslamDif.htm

    For those who might wonder why a bright fellow like Pittman subscribes to Christian beliefs (something so unfashionable here on Slashdot), the following may be illuminating:

    http://homepage.mac.com/ittybittycomputers/Areopag us.html

  303. Same ol' religious tactics... by gosand · · Score: 2
    If you can find me a religion that states man decides who lives and who dies, than I will eat my words.

    Sorry, I am not going to fall for your little tactic. You originally said

    "Whether you are christian, muslim, jew or otherwise, the common thread is that man does not determine who lives and dies, god does.".

    First of all, "otherwise" means everything else, which doesn't necessarily mean religion. You should be more clear.

    Second, I don't know of any religion that says "man decides who lives and dies", nor one that says "god decides who lives and dies". So by posing a false question, you are assured to get the answer you want. You are putting the ideals of religions into your own words, to suit your own purposes. But don't feel bad, it has been done for generation upon generation, you aren't the first. You have PRECISELY illustrated my point. Thank you.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Same ol' religious tactics... by BinaryC · · Score: 1

      I did not post the original comment, that was xtheunknown.

      Still, I think you missed my point, and his. It's not that you should believe what I do, or what he does; but rather that there are no schools of thought that say man is the one that should makes decisions such as "who deserves to die?". They *all* leave it up to a higher power, be it God, Karma, the Tao, etc. I think the confusion was that I called all higher powers "God", where a lot of people prefer to make a distinction, leaving the word "God" to the christians.

      I tend to call myself a Taoist, but I still say I believe in God for the very reason I stated above.

      --
      Ne Quid Nimis - All things in moderation
    2. Re:Same ol' religious tactics... by gosand · · Score: 2
      They *all* leave it up to a higher power, be it God, Karma, the Tao, etc.

      I can agree with this, but what I was getting at is that men can make the god, karma, tao, etc pretty much "say" whatever they want. In this way, the higher power is a creation of man. If it were truly up to the higher power, there would be no interpretation. That is why you can pretty much justify anything with a bible verse.

      As far as I can tell, all organized religions worship and follow some artifact that supposedly came from their god, and not the god itself.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  304. Osama ibn Laden's Home Page!! by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 0, Troll
    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  305. Nodody here has any sense of history. by TheNarrator · · Score: 1
    Not one of the comments posted here today displayed any perspective on September 11th from any view point informed by historical understanding, or at least of history that occurred before the birth date of the author.



    I think the Washington Times put it best when they compared 1 year after September 11th to 1 year after December 7th, 1942:

    Link
    ---Quote---
    Nobody was ready for "healing" on December 7, 1942, and "closure" was the last thing anybody wanted.
    America, on the first anniversary of that other date that lives in infamy -- often the benchmark by which September 11 is judged -- wanted blood and vengeance, without apology.
    No flowers, no teddy bears, and no exploration of the national angst. No presidential admonitions to think of Shinto as a religion of peace, no appeals to understand the frustrations that drove the misunderstood Nazis to rape Poland and bomb London.
    ---Quote---

  306. Smoke and Mirrors? by MrRee · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else think Bush's support of an invasion into Iraq is a ploy to divert public attention from the fact that we still haven't caught Bin Ladden? Seems to me no other country supports such an attack. I can't find justification for the US to attack another country that hasn't made a hostile move towards the US. Possible?

    1. Re:Smoke and Mirrors? by m11533 · · Score: 1

      Possibly... I lean more toward finishing the job his Dad started to pander to the Republican party's right wing, AND to fill the news with patriotic headlines as we head toward the election, pushing articles on the economy, unemployment, REAL defense issues, etc into the background as he can't possibly win on his record or the issues that are hurting most Americans.

  307. Re:Flamebait but it needs to be said by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0

    Hey! Why stop there? Lets just nuke EVERYONE who isn't us! You guys are being absured, we can't just nuke a small nation because a faction that takes residence their pisses us off and kills a fuck load of our people. Also, the use of nuclear weapons has an adverse effect on the WORLD. Personally, I don't care who or why, but I'm ALWAYS against using nuclear weapons on earth.

    --
    Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
  308. Re:Puleeze! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not thrilled with many of the actions Bush Inc. has taken since the events of last September, but if "erosion of rights" was the first thing you thought about last year, before the horror of the event and the massive loss of life, you are one selfish, heartless S.O.B.

    IMHO, of course.

  309. What a dilemma... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not so long ago I thought that I believed in the Death Sentence for appropriate offenders. Eventually I started to figure out that it is cheaper to put someone in prison for life, than to put them to death. So I changed my mind based on those thoughts.

    Then came Sept 11th, and with a numbness in my heart I watched the buildings burn and fall.

    I watched patriotism in our country be reborn anew...and also watched our country march off to war.

    We were angry, we were hurt, we were confused, and we were saddened. Things like this should not happen in anywhere. Ideally humans would rise above their petty differences based on race, religion, creedo, and fears. However we don't change that fast...and too many find it easy to follow charismatic leaders whom they feel give them a purpose in life, rather than seeking that purpose on their own.

    I don't like the fact that my country went out and bombed the ever living hell out of a mudhole of a country. The people there, most of whom are god (allah) fearing individuals, already endure much suffering due to civil war, and religious intolerance at the hand of a government.

    The people who attacked us are fanatics. Fanatics incapable of seeing past their own actions and the consequences that occur world wide. By their actions, they brought out some of the ugliness in people. Assaults on people who 'look' like muslims, defacing of holy places. It turned us into the muslim haters that they wanted us to be. Our media playing up on the attacks, and the displays of horror rather than the displays of goodness and kindness that came out of the rubble.

    Anymore I'm not sure what to think, other than our Government needs to do a better job with foreign relations and tolerance, and that us Americans need to learn a little humility.

    Living in a free country comes at the cost of security. The two do not mesh well together, and the knee-jerk public tends to think about the immediate concerns rather than how this will affect them in the future.

  310. Re: Puleeze by freaq · · Score: 1

    wake up. there is no end to the evil that successfully corrupted public officials are capable of. they will surveil anyone with munitions OR an attitude. or anyone they think they can later make appear to have had munitions OR an attitude. last i checked, the usa had made it standard practice to deny private counsel to accused. that's just major, wrong on every level. so, before i visit the united states again, i've got to learn handtalking. crap. i hate learning.

    --
    united states nuclear device terrorist bioweapon encryption cocaine korea syria iran iraq columbia cuba
  311. A heartfelt Thank You. by 920 · · Score: 1

    You know, I'm personaly tired of people making such a "thing" out of 9/11. But I ahve to say, I honestly appreciate what OSDN did with the banner ads. I checked slashdot a little after midnight and it almost made me cry when I say the banner ad. I'm glad someone saw it as a time when they should take a step back from everyday "grabbing for the cash" and honor those who died, those who sacraficed, and those who where close to them. Seeing as how I was a 911 dispatcher stuck in the middle of all this, and a volunteer firefighter in eastern PA, I can truly appreciate it. I feel for my brothers and sister who lost their lives. I feel for the innocents who died. This has truely led me to believe that there are some people, and busineses, around who care about the world. Let us all, please, observe a moment of silence, again for those who lost their lives durring this tragedy.

    But, at the same time, let's not get caught up in the morbid retrospective. Let's remember all the good that's happend in the last year. Personaly, I met my lovely wife. On top of that, I'm proud to annoucnce we're expecting the arrival of our son.

    It's been hard for many of us. Let this be a great example of how the american spirit lives though adversity. I live every day knowing that my 'brothers' (and sisters) died in the line of duty. I honor them every day by living my life to the fullest, as I know they would want. I suggest everyone do the same.

    That is all I have to say at this time. Be well. Be strong. And bless.

    Joe Gombarick

    --
    "Perl 6 gives you the big knob" -- Larry Wall
    1. Re:A heartfelt Thank You. by codefool · · Score: 1
      I honestly appreciate what OSDN did with the banner ads. I checked slashdot a little after midnight and it almost made me cry when I say the banner ad. I'm glad someone saw it as a time when they should take a step back from everyday "grabbing for the cash" and honor those who died, those who sacraficed, and those who where close to them.
      Hear! Hear! After reading that the ads had been suspended today - I decided to subscribe!

      Never forget.

      --
      "Stop whining!" - Arnold, as Mr. Kimble
  312. a poem that sums up my feelings by rberton · · Score: 1

    self evident - ani difranco

  313. Sure, it sucks... by rhavenn · · Score: 1

    Yes, the fact that so many people died sucks big time, but it doesn't change the fact that we have a moron for a president and big oil running this country. Take a look at this article
    over at the BBC.

  314. Right on by Wee · · Score: 2
    I couldn't have said it better, man. The stuff like the USA PATRIOT Act (which I got to hear a real live G-man talk about; go here for more details if interested), people being detained without reason/cause/notice, secret hearings, 6% of the population in prisons, etc just makes my head spin. Worse, my head has stopped spinning. I'm becoming immune to all this. The Federal Government is basically operating as if the Constitution no longer applies, and we are all supposed to feel safer? It like they snuck a state martial law on us and nobody noticed.

    I plan on doing two things today:
    1. Not turning on the TV for any reason whatsoever
    2. Giving some cash to the EFF

    I may make those actions my annual observance of "Patriot Day". Someone's got to look out for the public -- they don't even know they are under attack by their own government.

    You're not the only one sick of the knee-jerk, draconian jingoism which is destroying our liberties. It's just an unpopular thing to say. The worst part? Last night it dawned on me that the terrorists have already won: we're a scared nation, attacking our own citizenry by way of "defense".

    Anyway, I'm sad about what happened but enough is enough. I'm as proud as anyone to be American, and I love my country dearly, but something actually constructive needs to be done. And if I hear the word "Homeland" one more goddam time...

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  315. Yes, it's called natural selection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and it weeds out nihilist losers who don't think it is important to maximize the chances for their genetic legacy.

  316. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Jobe_br · · Score: 1

    I agree with other responses to your comment. Additionally, you don't need to take 'God' quite so literally, either. So you believe in karma or nirvana or what have you - fine. I believe the original posters intent was to direct you to consult your spirituality, whatever that might be. And as another poster has mentioned, atheism isn't spirituality, its the lack thereof. If you're happy with that, far be it from me to disagree with that - to each their own. However, even atheists typically have some sort of philosophy to follow, be it Kant or Socrates or any number of other philosophers. Since spirituality is very much akin to philosophy (consider it a philosophy of living), reflect on your philosophy of life, if you are indeed an atheist.

    Cheers.

  317. are you sure by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    What like they cleaned up the mess in Afghanistan half of the UK flattened and the government replaced with a US appointee great.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  318. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by tHiNk411 · · Score: 1

    I am buddhist, and I don't believe in a god. There are some Religions without gods.

  319. What to watch? by PirateKing · · Score: 1
    My wife is at home right now watching two movies we own.


    Passenger 57 and Air Force One


    Very therapeutic.

    --
    It is, it is, a glorious thing to be a Pirate King!
  320. I agree completely.... and you are wrong by mirnav · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Look at the same point in context of WHO attacked who and your point suffers miserably...

    Very true. In the same light, let's look at the issue at hand - Bin Ladin and his pyromaniac fremen did not just decide to set alight the World Trade Centers, you know. We take your advice, look at the context, and see that the reason why they are attacking the US might have something to do with the fact that their whole lives and those of their friends, family and everyone they have ever met has been affected for the worse because of American policies in the region where they live.

    I look at the issue objectively, and this is what I see. Not that I care one bit for the Arabs and their "causes" to kill thousands of civilians. Neither do I care for Americans who had to kill thousands of Afghan civilians because they got hit by the terrorism they had been funding and lashing onto other nations for so long.

    Sorry if this is a little harsh on the day of remembering the people who perished. I feel for them as I feel for the people of Hiroshima and Bosnia, as I feel for those who died in Nazi concentration camps. Still, you guys need to wake up from this "they are evil, we are good" crap and realize that it's your state's own clumsy meddling in international politics that turned to bite you this time. Yes, I agree completely that things need to be seen in their context. And this is the context created by the USA, with its merits and its perils.

    1. Re:I agree completely.... and you are wrong by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      Bin Laden is (was) a spoiled little brat from a wealthy family. He went looking for an identity and found it in hate. His conversion to radical Islam has more to do with a sense of guilt about his privledged upbringing rather then anything American has ever done.

      It is interesting to see the similarities between Bin Ladens upbringing and that of some european marxist-terrorists (Badder-Meinhof comes to mind)

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  321. Get Over it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    While I expect to get mod'ed down as a troll, which I am NOT try to do, I feel as though I have to vent.

    [Vent Mode: On]

    First let me say, Get Over It People!

    Here is why:

    1) The WTC tragedy happened a year ago, our lives have changed, and the WTC events are regrettable. Many people lost their lives and loved ones, but when can we let go of the past and let the dead rest in peace.

    2) Life continues, we need to look forward to what is ahead and attempt to prevent these things from happening in the future.

    3) Why are we so obsessed with this one event and not the other teribble things which have happened in our collective past? We, as a nation, do not make such a big deal out of remembering any one of the following: The Hindenberg Diaster in NJ, The Kent State shooting(s), The death of JFK in Dallas, The Challenger Disaster, Apollo 13 comming home, the list goes on and on. So, why are we making such a big deal about the Sept 11th attacks? Could it be that the national mas media outlets are having a slow news day(?), or worse are manipulating us to getting whipped up about this event.

    Come on people, Life is full of trials and tribulations. We need to deal with them and let them go, NOT get whipped up everytime the mass media makes a big fuss about events which happened last year!

    Hopefully, today will put an end to the mourning, and and bring a new determination to look to the future, and stop reliving the past.

    [Rant Mode: Off]
    Thank You for listening.

    1. Re:Get Over it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why are we so obsessed with this one event and not the other teribble things which have happened in our collective past? We, as a nation, do not make such a big deal out of remembering any one of the following: The Hindenberg Diaster in NJ, The Kent State shooting(s), The death of JFK in Dallas, The Challenger Disaster, Apollo 13 comming home, the list goes on and on. So, why are we making such a big deal about the Sept 11th attacks?


      Gee, maybe because all the events you rattle off combined claimed only a small fraction of the innocent lives that were lost last year. Besides which, nitwit, people did and often still do remember those event.

      And if you're going to use a [Vent Mode: On] pragma, don't close it with a [Rant Mode: Off]. Your syntax is as sloppy as your logic.

      Mod the parent post down as a troll, dummies.
    2. Re:Get Over it.... by gilgongo · · Score: 1

      > because all the events you rattle off combined
      > claimed only a small fraction of the innocent
      > lives that were lost last year.

      Oh I SEE! I SEEEE! Finally I can get a perspective on things! It's not WHY something happened, or what the significance of this was, or whether it could have been prevented, or whether it will happen again, or whether good men should do nothing or any of that crap... it's HOW MANY PEOPLE DIED!

      Right, I'm off to spend the rest of the year mourning the estimated 10,000 dead in the Bangladesh floods in 1999, the 6,000 killed in the battle of the Somme in 1916, the 1,000 that died in car accidents today around the world...

      Thank Christ for clear thinking.

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  322. Slashdot honors America with a 12-striped flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SSIA

  323. Hypocricy by Otis_INF · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    To the people who lost loved ones: all the best and I hope you'll find the strength to move on.

    That aside, the whole thing is getting on my nerves. I'm living in The Netherlands, Europe and our press tends to show us different news than what's just on CNN. And there is a lot more to tell than the 'We are the best' stuff, aired on CNN and other patriotic channels.

    - Widows of foreign workers who died in the massacre on 9/11/2001, will be deported out of the country. Because they were allowed to stay in the USA due to their husbands job, because that husband is dead now, the widows have to leave... pronto. Excuse me?
    - Remember all the innocent people still in jail, ONE YEAR after the disaster, without a trial. At least 500 men are still held in custody without a trial or accusation that they committed a crime and that they will be trialed at a later date. Nothing, they are just held into custody. No offence, but isn't that the same system 3rd world dictators use to keep the people doing what they want? It's definitely NOT part of any reasonable definition of 'democracy' and 'freedom'.
    - The CIA hasn't found any evidence against Saddam Hussein concerning Al Quayda. Remember: the laws the USA government pushed through congress after Sept. 11th, were for the war on terror (which is understandable). However, using these same laws, the current USA government is trying to use sept.11th and the results of that horrible crime to go after Saddam. You might think: "I don't care what reason they use", but that's the beginning of the end: if a certain government with a lot of guns (the USA) starts to dislike another government, it shouldn't result in instant war, there should be a certain control in place. That's now gone, due to the US PATRIOT act and other shabby laws.

    There are a lot of countries where people suffer due to the crimes committed by the governments of these countries, however the USA doesn't do a damn thing about THAT, like a lot of countries in Africa. (except selling guns of course). Let sept.11 be a landmark of how bad foreign policy can turn out and let it be a starting point to work on a solid WORLD where people understand eachother, instead of just kill whatever isn't compatible to a certain christian-right-wing policy cooked up in the white-house.

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  324. Yes!, please come join me at al-queda.org... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...ask for me at the bureau for perception management for the greater glory of Allah.

  325. Screw world peace. by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    Screw world peace. What the hell is world peace worth when radicals feel free to attack innocent civilians? Justice, si, not peace, is what is needed. Without justice, there can be no peace.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  326. Saudi Arabia is our friend, right... by randomErr · · Score: 2

    Here's a piece of an article I found. Just follow the link to read the rest and the comments people have made.

    ~enjoy

    OSAMA BIN LADEN WAS BAD APPLE,
    JUST LIKE JIM JONES
    http://www.odwyerpr.com/0905osama.htm

    Saudi Arabia says it is a full partner in President Bush's "war on terror," and a victim of terrorism, according to a document that Patton Boggs has distributed to staffers on Capitol Hill.

    The Embassy's "Background FAQ" deals with "hot button" issues such as "Saudi Support for Osama bin Laden," "Alleged Saudi Funding for Terrorism," "Saudi Freezing of Assets," "Saudi Education System and Anti-Americanism," "Saudi Arabia and Suicide Bombers," and "Stability in Saudi Arabia."

    Here are highlights:

    Re: bin Laden. "Osama bin Laden is a dissenter who has taken the side of evil. His citizenship was revoked in the early 1990s on account of his irresponsible acts and he remains unpopular among our citizens. As a nation, we are horrified by his actions and we reject what he and his followers stand for. They are deviants and criminals whose actions we strongly reject. People must understand that we are also victims of Osama bin Laden's terrorist acts."

    Re: terror funding. "The Crown Prince has said unequivocallyâ"âNo honorable man would accept terrorism.' Saudi Arabia does not support or contribute to terrorism. We never have, and we never will. Terrorism is against our religion and culture, and we have been victims of it for the past four decades. We monitor all financial transactions to ensure that no money goes to evildoers."

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  327. Just curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The banner ad HTML code includes the following:

    now = new Date();
    tail = now.getTime();
    AltText = "\"In Remembrance 9/11/01\"";
    document.write("");
    document.write(" IMG SRC='http://images.slashdot.org/banner/rmbr0002en. gif?");
    document.write(tail);

    I was wondering if the image changed according to what time it was, or...

  328. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by re-Verse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In my opinion, this is a bit myopic and shouldn't be given such a high score.

    We're talking about people who think it's OK to kill thousands of civilians and actively seek to do so. This isn't just "misguided," it's just plain wrong, but these people have all but been programmed to think this way.

    I'm not trying to start something nasty here, but there have been over a thousand Civilian deaths in Afganistan so far, and some reports say up to three thousand.

    You keep mentioning "these people" and how they all deserve death for "cheering" others death... Do you, in retrospect, also deserve death for cheering their death? One has to be very careful not to become just what they are fighting agasint.

    Not to mention, if the US armies sweep across the globe, killing all leaders that bush sees as "evil", we're going to make a lot more people hate us.. childen whos parents have died in anti-terrorist operations, civilians that got in the way.. etc. Its a perfect way to ensure future terrorists. Personally I'd like to know real reasons on why the USA is so hated by so many people across the globe, and don't tell me its becasue "they hate our freedom", its a wonder every time i see GWB say that with a straight face.

    I think this whole issue is a Lot more complex than having a simple "kill them all" solution. If we are supposed to be the most advanced and cultured society in the history of the earth, i'm sure we can do better than that.

    I may be modded down for this by some who think a second opinion is a bad thing, but i can't help but post this here. This is what i feel and i beleive its valid.

  329. Heroes, victims, and Communication by stonewolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    On the anniversary of September, 11
    2001, I want to talk about the difference between the victims onboard
    the first three airliners and the heroes onboard flight 93. What was
    the difference? Why did the people on flight 93 fight back? Why did
    the people on the other planes just sit and die?

    The answer comes down to communication and how knowledge forced the
    passengers to change their survival strategy. Everyone wants to
    live. Until 9/11/01 the best known strategy for surviving an airline
    hijacking was to sit in your seat, cooperate with the hijackers, and
    wait it out. That strategy worked because until 9/11/01 hijackers were
    trying to get hostages to trade for concessions and publicity. But,
    that changed on 9/11/01. On that day the hijackers wanted airliners to
    use as weapons. And, they counted on the passengers sitting in their
    seats and being cooperative to allow the plan to work.

    On flight 93, the passengers fought back. Why? Because they knew that
    three other hijacked airliners had been used as weapons and everyone
    on board them had died. When they knew they were onboard a weapon
    their survival strategy changed and the scope of their survival
    strategy also changed. Their choices no longer affected only their own
    lives. Now, theei actions also affected the lives of hundreds or thousands
    of people on the ground.

    Given the choice of sitting quietly in their seats and waiting for
    death or fighting and having a chance to live, they chose to fight for
    their lives and the lives of the people on the ground. They knew that
    if they won they would live and so would an unknown number of people
    on the ground who were targeted by the weapon they were flying on. They
    also knew that they could die and still save people on the ground. At
    that point the correct thing to do, the moral thing to do, the action
    that saved the most lives, was to fight. They fought.

    We that given the same choice many people through
    out history chose to do nothing and died as cowards and victims. Those
    who chose to fight we deservedly call heroes.

    But all that misses the whole point. The reason that the heroes of
    flight 93 fought is that they knew they had to fight or die. They knew
    because there was an air to ground phone on the back of the chair in
    front of them and they used them to find out what was going on. It was
    free, unregulated, communication that made the difference. It was that
    basic freedom to communicate that let them know they needed to
    fight. It was that same that let us know they did fight. It was their right to be
    informed that let them become heroes.

    As people who use the Internet, the most free and open communication
    media every developed, we are honor bound to fight. To fight any
    attempt to reduce the freedom to communicate. To fight to spread the
    right of freedom of information and communication to everyone in the
    world.

    Flight 93 proved to the world that free people given accurate
    knowledge of their situation will make heroic choices and take heroic
    actions. Are we heroes who can make the same choices? Will we fight to
    protect and extend the right to communicate that allowed the heroes of
    flight 93 to become heroes?

    I hope so. I believe so. Let's roll.

    Stonewolf

    1. Re:Heroes, victims, and Communication by RgnadKzin · · Score: 1

      While the truth about flight 93 will never be known, as the voice recorders are "missing," and the wing is in a completely different place from the rest of the wreckage (giving rise to questions as to whether it was truly shot down, instead of brought down from within), it does point out one very glaring fact:

      It is the people who are personally responsible for their own safety. The "government" has neither the capability nor the incentive to protect you and me. Only we can do that.

      To that end, I propose that all able bodied men and women who know how to use a personal firearm carry one. Everywhere.

      While I would not have hesitated too long before flinging myself upon the hijackers in order to overcome them, I would certainly prefer to take a head shot from 25 feet.

      I would not have missed.

      --
      Liberty is not a concept... Liberty is a way of life!!!
  330. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
    The only other "alternative" is to lock them up in a cell somewhere for the rest of their lives. And as far as I'm concerned, captial punishment is more humane than life in prison with no chance of parole. Nothing but you, the four walls around you, and your thoughts.

    And you're worried about being humane why?

    The only reason I oppose the death penalty is because it's hypocritical to say "don't kill people or we'll kill you". That is the government putting themselves in the place of god, and personally I don't have any need for god to begin with, in holy or governmental form.

    On the other hand, "don't kill people or we'll remove you from society" is a completely fair thing to do, and not at all hypocritical. Of course the counter-argument is that we lock people up for kidnapping and detaining people "unlawfully" but hey, you have to do something with them, and if one of the basic arguments is that killing people is wrong, it seems ridiculous to kill people as punishment.

    I don't think you necessarily have to put them in a cell by themselves for the rest of their lives, but you do have to lock them up for the rest of their lives. If you kill them, you give them surcease; My vote is to put them in a big cage surrounded (At a distance) by video walls displaying scenes of the suffering 24/7.

    If you're feeling humane, unlike the offenders, you can turn the sound off at night.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  331. DISPELLING THE AMERICAN OIL MYTH by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Who do you think is the largest exporter of oil to the United States?
    Its not who you think it is.
    most people would say Saudi, Iran or Kuwait.
    WRONG.
    The largest exporter of oil to the United States is Mexico. Followed by Columbia and Venezuala. Ever heard of the FTAA? Wonder why the Americans seem to want it more than anyone else?
    Oh and lets look down the list to.. NUMBER SIX- IRAQ. Isnt that funny? And who is doing the importing of oil from Iraq? a little company called Haliburtant, chaired by our honourable friend Dick Chaney.
    Is anyone else finding this odd?

    look it up. http://www.google.com
    and while you're at it, look up the Carlyle Group.

    EDUCATE YOURSELF. Sometimes what you dont know is staring at you right in the face, you've just been traind not to look.

    I leave you with this:
    We all know why the US went to war with Iraq. They've told us quite often, because Iraq invaded Kuwait.
    But why did Iraq invade Kuwait?
    look it up. It might surprise you.

    --
    -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
    1. Re:DISPELLING THE AMERICAN OIL MYTH by Kwantus · · Score: 2, Informative

      finally, a worthwhile comment on /. now how do i give out mod points?

      Tajikistan(?) will probably beat out Iraq once Unocal gets its pipeline through Afghanistan built. (You should also look into Karzai's former executive work and Armitage's former consulting work for *tahdah* Unocal.)

    2. Re:DISPELLING THE AMERICAN OIL MYTH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzzzzt. Wrong.

      The majority of America's crude oil and petroleum products combined come from Canada. The largest supplier of crude oil alone is Saudi Arabia.

      More here: http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/rankings/totimportsby_ country.htm

  332. Amen, Brother! by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    Write on!

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  333. Thanks by UrGeek · · Score: 1

    Thank you, OSDN and Slashdot for this small little rememberance. Thank you, for the heroes and tragic victims of the four flights and on the ground at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. And most of all, for the brave First Responders who gave up everything to save as many as they could. We will never forget. NEVER!

  334. Our memorial to September 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Last year on this day, as normal, we were conversing on IRC on our company IRC server and had recorded the channel. Today, as our way of remembering the event, we have replayed the IRC logs from last year in real time. It has been very moving.

  335. OSDN banner ad not Y2K-compliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How soon we forget.

  336. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1
    It's not about death as revenge or justice as far as I'm concerned, it's about death because there's literaelly nothing else to do with these people. There's no way that human law can possibly carry out a "just" punishment against these people no matter what you do.

    We're talking about people who think it's OK to kill thousands of civillians and actively seek to do so. This isn't just "misguided," it's just plain wrong, but these people have all but been programmed to think this way.


    The U.S.'s war in Afghanistan has killed thousands of civilians. War against Iraq would probably kill an order of magnitude more Iraqis. Where does that fall on your moral scale?
  337. Re:I agree completely.... No, you are wrong by chewmanfoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You think your "objectivity" grants you license to illuminate the real reasons for the attacks on Sept. 11. You suggest that American foreign policy is so nefarious, so wicked that two gigantic stuctures and thousands of innocent civilians should die as some sort of repayment.
    Remember that you're living in a nation run by imperfect humans who make diplomatic decisions every day. Where are you from anyway? Think about your largest city, and the two largest buildings in that city. Now, in your mind, bring those buildings down and crush the thousands working there, one by one, in the process. Think about all the funerals for the EMS workers, all the unknown heroes who will perish in that single act of "justice". Now, remember, you deserved it. Go down to ground zero wearing a plaquard reading "Our Own Foreign Policy Did This. It's Our Fault." I have no doubt your fellow countrymen would give you more than a black eye.
    Any suggestion that unknown or plainly obvious foreign policy decisions led to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and that these attacks were somehow justified because of such corrupt foreign policy, is completely assanine.

  338. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by invid · · Score: 2

    Don't be too eager to deal out death, but do it if you have to. Gandalf deals out his share of death.

    --
    The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
  339. Bzzzzzttt. Wrong. by mccrew · · Score: 1
    >Don't forget, the suckers who crashed planes into WTC&Pentagon were uneducated ones

    The "suckers" who crashed planes into WTC & Pentagon were privileged, elite, and college-educated.

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
  340. The post's point (Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T!) by jackDuhRipper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems to be the point of the poster was that Japan had a long history of agressive & atrocious behavior which stopped soon after some very firm and significant pressure was applied in the form of several megatons of explosives.

    It's a good point to note: tit for tat leads to ongoing conflict, while massive retaliation generally gets the message across more succinctly and saves lives in the long run.

    Frightening, yes, but historically accurate.

    1. Re:The post's point (Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T!) by junkgrep · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ---Japan had a long history of agressive & atrocious behavior---
      If by "long" you mean more than simply that regime during WWII, then that statement seems wrong. Japan was on the side of the Allies in WWI. In fact, nationalism only exploded in Japan after the WWI Treaty in which Japanese moderates we dealt a telling blow by people like President Wilson, who not only refused to honor their contributions, but rejected Japans' proposed treaty language condemning racism and wars of racial superiority (boy, was THAT shortsighted of us!).

      The Japanese moderates tons of face over this, the hardliner racist facists took over, and Japan basically decided that if the West would never accept them as equal partners, and there could be no truce against racial rivalry, then the West wasn't going to be allowed to belittle it anymore, or treat it as trivial.

      ---It's a good point to note: tit for tat leads to ongoing conflict, while massive retaliation generally gets the message across more succinctly and saves lives in the long run.---

      So why wasn't Iraq's gassing of the Kurds, most of whom were rebelling at the time, just good policy? It sent a message (just as we sent a message in Japan) that stopped the fighting in its tracks and certainly saved a lot of lives. Do you at least appreciate how easily this principle could be abused? Do you at least see that, however warped, this was EXACTLY the stated rationale of Osama: that if they caused enough damage in one blow, that we'd reconsider and get out of the Middle East, thus saving them the trouble of having to start a war there?

    2. Re:The post's point (Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T!) by jackDuhRipper · · Score: 2
      It sent a message (just as we sent a message
      in Japan) that stopped the fighting in its
      tracks and certainly saved a lot of lives.
      Do you at least appreciate how easily this
      principle could be abused? Do you at least
      see that, however warped, this was EXACTLY
      the stated rationale of Osama: that if they
      caused enough damage in one blow, that we'd
      reconsider and get out of the Middle East,
      thus saving them the trouble of having to
      start a war there?

      The principal can certainly be abused, and the morality of the actors can be taken into question.

      The principal itself, however, seems time-proven: Massive retaliation is more effective than "responses-in-kind."

      The 'retaliation' (for being capitalistic infidels, apparently) from Osama et al. was not massive enough to make us rethink our positions and it created something more like an angered wasp, bringing to mind what Gene Wilder's Sheriff said in Blazing Saddles:

      "Oh, don't shoot Mongo; you'll only make him mad."

    3. Re:The post's point (Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T!) by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Seems to be the point of the poster was that Japan had a long history of agressive & atrocious behavior which stopped soon after some very firm and significant pressure was applied in the form of several megatons of explosives.

      15 kilotons total, actually. Fat Man was 5KT, and Little Boy was 10KT, IIRC. (Makes you wonder what a one-megaton device would do to a civilian population, eh? Any remember that link to Scientific American where you could get a map of the damage to a specified location from a nuclear blast?)

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    4. Re:The post's point (Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T!) by MSBob · · Score: 2

      Japan has a long history of aggression against Korea.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    5. Re:The post's point (Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T!) by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Everyone has a long history of aggression against Korea.

    6. Re:The post's point (Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T!) by Sam+Gibson · · Score: 1

      No, Japan got it's Samurai's asses kicked by korea and as such stopped fucking with them.

  341. Blame the Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So hear we go... American media chooses to acknowledge an American tragedy and we get to see, hear, and read about how Americans don't know/care about the rest of the world. Blame the Americans.

    As if that wasn't a deep enough insult, knee jerk liberals from (mostly) Europe and America trot out their lists of grievances about America and Americans and, with their simple-minded rhetoric, try to attribute every last malaise around the globe to either American neglect ("How come the Americans didn't come to European/Indian/etc. aid during the recent flooding/earthquake/etc.?) or malevolence (everything from slavery/Jim Crow at home to Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, etc. abroad.) Blame the Americans.

    (BTW, where was the European and Indian help during America's floods of the early 1990s and the drought of the late 1990s? San Francisco earthquake? Other natural disasters? We don't expect it... but don't expect it of us, either...)

    Certainly, the American government has not always acted with the noblest of intentions. However, I submit to you that the governments belonging to every America-basher are just as guilty for creating the mess the world is in. Like its neighbor to the south, Canada has a long history of opressing its native peoples and is only recently starting to make serious amends. The Australians have not fared any better with the indiginous people of their land. In addition, both countries, along with the UK, routinely back and participate in U.S. sponsored activities. The UK, which is is America's closest ally next to Canada, has helped create a long standing and violent conflict with the Irish. For their part, the Irish (and the deplorable Irish-American hypocrits who support them) have launched bloody attacks against the British for decades. Can you please demonstrate how to behave peacefully to those brutal, war-mongering Americans?

    But the grievances against the English speaking world are relatively minor when compared with the violent histories belonging to Germany and Italy. From the Kaiser to Hitler and Mussolini to political assasinations, these two countries have long engaged in violent outbursts, frequently masked by a veneer of civility and/or order. Blame the Americans for financing Saddam Huessein earlier in his career? Fine. But, you might find some interesting European links -- especially in Germany. France is not much better: Like the UK, Germany, and Italy, they were participants in colonialism across Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. France continued to support despots in its former colonies long after giving up its territorial possessions. And, a special place is reserved in Hell for all the Belgians, who were especially cruel colonialists in Africa. Africa still reels from the harshness and brutality of European colonialism. Many of the grievances in the Middle East have roots in European colonialism, as well. But, of course the problems in the Iraq, Saudia Arabia, Israel, and Palestine are, of course, all the creation of the terrible Americans. How convenient. Blame the Americans.

    The world outside Europe and America? The Russians (Soviets) were second only to the Europeans in their hunger for conquest. As if the repression, abuse, and death brought to their own people weren't sufficient, the Russians took it upon themselves to spread their cruelty to Eastern Europe and beyond, also touching the Middle East. In fact, many of the problems in Afghanistan stem from the Russian invasion. But, better to blame the Americans.

    What of the noble Arabs, victims of the terrible Israelis? How about we start with things like democracy? Please show me one -- all I'm asking for is one -- Arab democracy. Okay, you can't do it. If most Arab countries treat their male constituents as second class citizens, then, how do they treat foreign nationals and females? In many cases as slaves and indentured servents. And, for all the anti-Israeli rhetoric flying about in forums such as this, it might be wise to point out that Israel is the only nation in the region that has enough confidence in their constituents to allow freely elected government. These are just a few of many less than savory reasons that many Arab states would like to eradicate the Israelis and their government -- equality and democracy. But, it's a much more honorable course of action to acquiesce to Arab states and, specifically, to the Palestinians. Sure, attack Israel all you want. Go ahead, create another monarchy or theocracy and suppress your citizens. It's all for the good of peace, isn't it. Then, blame the Americans for allowing the creation of cruel, repressive monarchies and theocracies.

    The Chinese and Japanese have long traditions of peaceful and orderly philosophies like Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism. Both countries also share long histories of conquest of neighboring regions. No country treated its WWII prisoners more cruelly than the Japanese. Slavery, rape, torture, you name it. An attack on the U.S., which had not even entered the war? And, what of the Chinese and the repression at Tiananmen Square? What of Falun Gong? Tuva? Mongolia? Tibet? Blame the Americans.

    Africa? A list of nations sounds like a Who's Who of brutality: Liberia, Libya, South Africa (during apartheid), Nigeria, Angola, Somalia, Congo, Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Rwanda, Hutus, Tutsis...

    India? Care to discuss clashes with Pakistan or Sri Lanka? Like the problems in Africa, this may be the legacy of European colonialsm, but blame the Americans, anyway.

    My point is this: You can't blame the Americans for everything -- although it doen't stop some individuals from trying. From time to time, American policy may indeed be suspect. But, so are the policies of just about every nation of the world. (We might be able to give a pass to Bhutan. I'm not sure whether they have any serious transgressions in their recent history.) For every time you point out a valid American transgression, look to your own country and people as well. For every time you congratulate your country, look deeper and examine the activities of other nations (yes, Americans, too) with the same measure. When you chose to blindly blame America and Americans for various problems, you obscure the facts and often absolve tyrants -- and you fail to get at the truth of the matter. We're all in this together. We all create the good and bad of this world. And, for all your problems, don't blame the Americans.

    1. Re:Blame the Americans by i0scan · · Score: 1

      Well stated!!! I am sick of the people who comment on posts or post opionions themselves with little or no knowledge of the facts. I am sure opinion on any topic is more than welcome at any time, but some people feel that their opinion should matter and is correct. Even if they haven't the slightest knowledge in the subject or facts to back up their own opionions. I don't go to medical doctor forums and reply to some subject or post. Why? I don't have any knowledge of the facts so my opinion would be of absolute zero value. Most of the people on slashdot should follow one simple rule, Have an opionion? Share it. But don't comment on things you know absolutely nothing about. If you do comment,... raise ideas and comments as questions not as fact... unless the person can backup, or provide proof and/or data to support their possition.

      I agree with you tremendously and feel that if this were a truely "moderated" forum, factless, baseless, pointless, posts would not appear or would appear as a different color. (for being baseless opinion and not "valid points for debate" with facts or statements that can be backed up in some way.) However great this would be, it is beyond the capabilities of anything but an extremely large company. The one simple thing would be to add an age range icon to each comment. So that I am not going to have to sit here and wonder if the guy/gal on the other end is just an idiot for his/her stupidity or is too young to have any large amount of knowledge of historic events. I am not age bias... I just believe that unless your truley gifted, a 12 year olds opinion is, on average, going to be more baseless than someone who was around during an event or time period.

  342. full of civilians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or agents of the state.
    If my millarry target is globalisation, capatilism ..... then the owrkers of the WORLD TRADE centres were agents of the state not civilians.

    1. Re:full of civilians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my millarry target is globalisation, capatilism ..... then the owrkers of the WORLD TRADE centres were agents of the state not civilians.

      So then, you are like a Marxist, but instead of trying to unite the workers of the world, you want them to be massacred? You must have an unusual mind to be able to justify this.

    2. Re:full of civilians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you bit,
      Why for one tiny moment would your little brain even think that I only write things from my point of view. If there is no-one to defend the view of a significant minority then I'll defent them against the brainwashed majority like you.

    3. Re:full of civilians by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      You can not fight an ism. Just like the whole "War on Terrorism" is pointless, so is a war on capitalism. An ism is an ideal, you can not fight an ideal

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  343. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by BinaryC · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I should have been more clear with my use of the word 'God'. I tend to use the word to mean more than most people think. I am a Taoist, and I do believe in God, just not God in the normal sense. Buddhists tend to be the same way, correct? I admit my knowlege of Buddhism is fairly limited. Most of it I have gathered from the writings of the Dalai Lama. If I remember correctly, doesn't Buddmism teach that God is kindness, and we should all strive to be more Godly? If that is the case, then I believe my original statement is still true.

    --
    Ne Quid Nimis - All things in moderation
  344. LIVE FREE OR DIE by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

    New Hampshire State motto.
    One of the few states that remember that small government is better, and what the constitution is all about (though Vermont has us beat.)

    You are a coward. Better to die a free man than live as a slave.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:LIVE FREE OR DIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the famous quote:

      "Give me liberty or give me death!"

    2. Re:LIVE FREE OR DIE by Sebastopol · · Score: 2

      Fuck that.

      I say, Better Red then Dead.

      I would have gladly been part of an uprising to take back the USA from commie invasion in the 40's, as opposed to destroying the entire planet.

      One line cliches give you one line answers. Think bigger.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    3. Re:LIVE FREE OR DIE by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      Sure, I could have wrote more. But I had no desire to repeat what others have written in this same thread, so I offered a familiar platitude.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  345. Laisez faire capitalism (off topic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know I'm soooo tempted to blow you out of the water with that one..

    Here goes,
    if your 'Laisez faire capitalism' state what do you do about law and order, is that run on a free market too?

    1. Re:Laisez faire capitalism (off topic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Laisez Faire? That is a pretty stupid idea. You obviously haven't studied much history. Since you don't seem to know, I'll inform you of something. Laisez Faire DIDN'T WORK!. Workers didn't accept how they were being treated. That is one of the reasons we have what they call Trade Unions...say it with me now, Trade Unions.
      And anarchy? Anarchy has never, ever, ever, existed for any length of time in human history. In practice anarchy is impossible. Impossible to create, and impossible to maintain. The same thing with socialism.
      Every "anarchist" and "socialist" I ever met has told me that I was ignorant because I didn't agree with socialism. Well it was ignorant people that allowed a beast like Stalin into power, and ignorant people that allowed his successors to keep power.
      Anarchy and Socialism are impossible ideals. Get over it and stop bitching about it. I don't care if you have a mohawk. Big deal. I don't care if you hate your parents, the capitalist pigs they are. Just remember where you get your lunch money from. And then when you have paid and start eating, remember that some kid in russia only gets that amount of food in a week.

  346. Think about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3000 dead. 6000 dead. 4600 dead. 5500 dead.

    3000 people died in the WTC attack.
    6000 civilians have been killed in Afghanistan since the beginning of the "War on Terrorism"
    4600 children died of measles each week in Africa.
    5500 Africans die of AIDS each day.

    Cry not for the rich white men who died in the towers.
    Cry for the deaths we have the power to stop, but simply do nothing instead. Otherwise you will drown in your own hypocrisy.

    1. Re:Think about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      di que sí...puñeteros estadounidenses, se creen los amos del mundo y que sus muertos valen más que el resto...se lo merecen por prepotentes.

  347. This is just sad. by juuri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please, stop telling that America is so great. America is every bit as stupid, selfish, jealous, paranoid and incompetant as any other country. And it's considerable more brutal, repressive and intolerant than many.

    I am so tired of this bullshit. The USA is by far the best behaved super power the world has ever known. Anyone who claims any different is blinding themselves to the real truths of history. You tell me one world power, who at their prime, was better behaved than the USA? Not one other country comes even remotely close. No it isn't a perfect country and yes many of its policies suck ass, but your claim is completely without merit.

    We has a world have come a long ways in the last 50 years... a long ways. We still have a long ways to go.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
    1. Re:This is just sad. by Kidbro · · Score: 2

      You tell me one world power, who at their prime, was better behaved than the USA?

      The fact that we haven't had any "world power" "at their prime" for more than 50 years (I'd say that's when USSR was at their prime, Britain was 100 years ago, and others further back) makes your point void.
      All countries (with the occasional exception) behaves better than they - or any country did 100+ years ago. Setting your standards in foreign politics by looking at how countries behaved centuries ago doesn't really make anyone look better by today's standards...

  348. i have just one thing to say... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    and that is that personally, i'm disgusted that there's still people in this world that think it's acceptable to kill.

  349. sweet jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, after reading that and laughing, there's no doubt: i'm going to hell.

    but at least there will be funny people there to keep me company.

  350. Re:Bzzzzzttt. Wrong. by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    By your same reasoning, President Bush is also privileged, elite, and college-educated. Does that make him the least bit intelligent?

  351. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    We're talking about people who think it's OK to kill thousands of civillians and actively seek to do so. This isn't just "misguided," it's just plain wrong, but these people have all but been programmed to think this way.


    And the civillians killed in Afghanistan, Iraq, or (Insert country here) by US bombs, do they deserve less? Should the leaders of the USA be killed because of their actions?


    These people are too far gone to even try to set straight. We'd be doing everybody a favor (including them) by killing them.


    One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter, or something like that. You are not doing them a favour by killing them. You are not even helping yourself. How many enemies do you create when you kill that one. How many old enemies are now willing to go that much further because of it? You are adding to a chain reaction that will only end up bad for both sides. I believe something better will have to be thought of for these criminals. I don't know what, but if you lock one up, a group highjacks a plane to attempt to get his release, if you kill one, who knows what will happen.

    Also, like it or not, US foreign policy has alot of problems, and alot of it has to do with protecting US businesses holdings in foreign countries. It's safe to assume that if you oppress (see CIA) people in a country for the profits of a company in your country, you are going to piss some people off. Sure, it doesn't give them the right to fly a few jets into some of your buildings and doesn't make it any more morally right, but at least it may make you understand why some became such crazy mothers with a want to kill all Americans.

    P.S. I'm not trying to lay blame to the US for what happened last year. As I said, nothing that's been done makes killing thousands of innocent people any more right.

  352. Chile, etc. by nullard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    September 11 (1973) US-backed coup overturns democratically elected government in Chile, leading to thousands of deaths, tortures and "disappearances"

    My father was there. He was listening to the radio as democratically elected Aliende prepared to defend his country with his life. Even knowing that he had no chance, he armed himself and stood in front of the seat of the govenrment to fend off the coup with his own hands.

    Would Bush have done the same? Would any recent U.S.president?

    If some foreign force invaded DC, would any recent president -- knowing it would be certain death -- have the cojones to deffend his nation? Or would he run and hide?

    My parents were both in Brazil durring the U.S.-backed military dictatorship there. My father got a first-hand look at just how involved the U.S. was in that affair.

    My father and I now work to change U.S. policy so that maybe someday the rest of the world won't have a reason to hate us. Patriotism is loving your country enough to see its faults -- and try and fix them.

    --


    t'nera semordnilap
    1. Re:Chile, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a problem with what you're saying... In theory, the president should have more important things to do and worry about than actually *fight*. If I saw W fighting, I'd think he was being irresponsible (I already think he's an idiot)

  353. Re:Any new ideas for the Israel vs Palestine probl by stanmann · · Score: 1

    Well, how bout 4-6000 year old problem. It is a family squabble, no real solution.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  354. Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that was a tribute for all the firemen, but it looks like someone decided not to like it and modded it 'redundant'. Thank you and fuck you!

  355. wimp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not trolling, I'm just pissed off because it's this kind of thinking that got us here in the first place.
    First, you don't disarm Americans to make us safe. That makes it easier for everyone else to take advantage of us. In the 50s, most pilots were ex-military and carried guns. Imagine if those pilots were armed. The twin towers would still be standing and we won't be suffering from hearing a bunch of crappy reporters pretend to care 24 hours a day 7 days a week.
    Liberty is the the primary civil right. Liberty gives us life. How can you protect your own self if you don't have the freedom to do so? That's what America's all about. Take your commie ass somewhere else.

  356. Turkey by akb · · Score: 2

    First I'd like to say I abhor the racism that you have experienced. Thank you for sharing your experiences, its very widespread and something that most Americans don't acknowledge.

    A friend just related a story to me the other day about going through a toll booth and the attendant saying "We're going to get you and your friends."

    I am curious about the statement you made:

    the only true muslim (as I am not) ally doesn't play games with USA

    This doesn't seem to be the case as far as I can see, I'd love to hear your feedback. Turkey has and will continue to use its strategic location with respect to Iraq and as a path for a pipeline for Caspian oil to gain US support and silence for its suppression of the Kurds. It is very clear that a condition of use of bases in Turkey to remove the Iraqi regime is that a Kurdish state not be formed from northern Iraq.

  357. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by chill · · Score: 2
    Personally I'd like to know real reasons on why the USA is so hated by so many people across the globe, and don't tell me its becasue "they hate our freedom", its a wonder every time i see GWB say that with a straight face.

    People are passionate about their beliefs. Beliefs often define who a person is and what their culture/society stands for. If you don't share their beliefs, you are in essence telling them that they are wrong and ignorant and that their culture has little or no value. At best, since you don't "convert" you are saying your way is superior.

    The United States is the strongest military power in the world, bar none. We've budgeted more $$ for defense in 2003 than countries 2-16 combined! Our culture is pervasive. Go to Taiwan and you'll see a Starbucks and McDonalds on almost every corner. Levi's, Coca Cola and Disney are mega-sellers in almost every country with an economy. It is nothing to see people in Europe and the Middle East bitching about "Americans" while swilling a Coke and sitting in a pair of Western jeans.

    Mao Tse Tung called them "Sugar Coated Bullets" -- American cultural icons like Disney and Coke spreading thru China. Like the Playboy store in ShangHai.

    France, during the 80s, refused to ratify the GATT treaty until there were restrictions (quotas) put on American movies, television and music imports. France is especially sensative of their culture and diminished global influence.

    In short (too late!), American culture is taking over the world. We aren't forcing it, people choosed what they like. Other cultures are getting forced out and feel threatened. The resulting fear turns to hatred of America and Americans. We are a "corrupting" influence. And we do take for granted freedoms and benefits others can only dream of.

    Many European politicians are not defined by their beliefs -- they simply pick the opposite side of what America chooses, regardless.

    In closing, for those that would argue to live and let live, that only works if EVERYONE does it and regardless of what direction America takes, we will piss off SOMEONE.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  358. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "I'm not trying to start something nasty here, but there have been over a thousand Civilian deaths in Afganistan so far, and some reports say up to three thousand. "

    Was I cheering the civillian deaths? Was I chanting "kill all ragheads?" No, my opinion is that the higher-ups of al Qaeda, the ones who decided the attacks last year were a good idea and actively worked to support them, shouldn't have "leniency" from the death penalty. They are in a small class of people that are simply too far gone from the basics of civilization as to be unsalvagable.

    As for the rest of the organization and perhaps the region as a whole, for the most part they just need a big dose of the First Amendment. Give them the ability to get information easily and let them decide for themselves (instead of the propoganda they've been force-fed) and they'll likely see the error of their ways. Unfortunately for everybody involved, that probably won't be coming any time soon...

  359. Whoops - Missing Link by wass · · Score: 2
    Ack, Slashdot ate my link!


    Here is the link that should have been in the above article, to snopes urban legend site.

    http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/cnn.htm


    To try it again as a referenced link, go
    here .

    --

    make world, not war

  360. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

    there have been over a thousand Civilian deaths in Afganistan so far

    Source please, and no, www.lefty.org, www.bedwettingliberal.com, www.deathtoamerica.net doesn't cut it.

    --
    between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  361. Nice try by mccrew · · Score: 1
    By your same reasoning, President Bush is also privileged, elite, and college-educated. Does that make him the least bit intelligent?

    Huh? Where did that come from?

    The original AC post claimed that the perpetrators of 9/11 were uneducated and brainwashed (and seemed to imply that they themselves were somehow "victims" of fanatic indoctrination, but we're not going to go there). That statement is patently false. I corrected the record.

    So, to answer your logically-flawed question: if President Bush is also privileged, elite, and college-educated, then that makes him privileged, elite, and college-educated.

    Clear now? Good.

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
  362. Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wrote that originally?

    If you cut and paste a phrase from it into a
    Google search you'll get several hits all
    containing the same text, so I was just wondering.

  363. Freedom by PlasticParts · · Score: 1

    Our government has to do what it takes to prevent any future terrorists activities both her and abroad. If some of freedoms are comprimised, so be it. An honest person has nothing to fear from these changes. We don't get ourselves into situations that could be taken as terrorist in nature. Only those suspecious characters trying to plot an act will be investigated and scrutinized. We have let the bleeding-heart liberals dilute our national security under the guise of freedom's. A little fear is good, it keeps you honest. Don't worry, your freedoms won't be taken away like they would lead you to believe. Fear tactics are only used by those who don't want their subversive activities investigated. A honest, upstanding citizen doesn't fear scrutiny. He has nothing to hide.

  364. Wow by Azureash · · Score: 1

    This has got to be the most pointless discussion ever on Slashdot.
    I mean, come on, you're on a Slashdot (FRIGGIN SLASHDOT!) discussing religion, morality, and pseudo world history. That does it, I'm turning off my computer and staring blankly into space for the rest of the day.

    --
    Look at my karma - I'm bad, just like Michael Jackson!
  365. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    "The U.S.'s war in Afghanistan has killed thousands of civilians. War against Iraq would probably kill an order of magnitude more Iraqis. Where does that fall on your moral scale?"

    We're not the ones actively targeting civillians. We're not the ones hiding behind civillians. Hell, we're the ones actively trying to find genuine military targets to strike.

    We've invaded Afghanistan. Unlike the previous regime, we're not actively raping and pillaging our enemy civillian populations. We're not forcing our moral system on others (note that Afghanistan probably won't have anything resembling the First Amendment in the forseeable future).

    Are the civillian deaths regrettable? Yes. Should we try to avoid them whenever we can. Yes. But, unlike our enemies, we do regret the civillian deaths (instead of cheering them) and we do try to avoid killing them whenever we can (instead of making sure they're in the cross-fire).

    I fail to see how current US military actions fall into the same catetory.

    This whole discussion reminds me of something Orwell once brought up: Freedom of speech hinders the war efforts of democratic societies and ultimately aid their non-democaratic enemies. And before you jump to conclusions, I'm not saying "do away with freedom of speech for the war effort," I'm just trying to point out that a year ago, if you publicly spoke out against al Qaeda and Taliban actions against civillians in Afghanistan, you'd be long dead by now. Maybe you should consider that before you start lumping us all together in one category next time.

    (I am now predicting at least three responses to this post mentioning the name "Aschroft")

  366. Some choice excerpts from the archive by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2
    How many slashdotters will rethink their views on the necessity of CIA and NSA covert SIGINT after today's tragedy?

    How about: How many /.'s will rethink the competence of the CIA and NSA covert SIGINT after 9/11?

    From rossz (link to article):

    The biggest casualty will probably be our Constitution. Whenever a tragedy likes this occurs, the government always announces a get tough on terrorists policy that will have no effect on the psychopaths who do this, but will severely limit our rights.

    Hole in One, rossz!

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  367. Re:Puleeze! by NumberSyx · · Score: 2

    Well, if we live in constant fear of being killed, and therefore cannot travel, work or even leave our homes...can you truly call that Freedom?

    Cold as it may sound, I would consider this a personal choice and/or problem. There are many places in the world were terrorism is a daily occurance, and yet they manage to leave thier houses to goto work, go on vacations and generally live thier lives.

    --

    "Our products just aren't engineered for security,"
    -Brian Valentine,VP in charge of MS Windows Development

  368. Here's how it works: by skelf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    - "We" (the giant corporate military industrial complex of the "west",
    including the world bank, IMF, WTO, etc.) systematically oppress,
    murder and enslave entire countries full of innocent people.

    - We install our own dictatorships in these countries (e.g. Indonesia,
    Iraq, etc.) while parcelling up their resources among 1st-world
    megacorporations, many of which have larger operating budgets than
    entire countries.

    - We force these countries to accept "free trade", meaning we make
    them remove all import tarriffs, and then flood their economy with
    cheap products and staple foods. Just like when a Wal-Mart moves in
    next door, the local artisans/farmers cannot compete, and they and
    their children must give up the farm and move into the city to work
    for subsistence wages under inhumane conditions in factories for
    Gap, Nike, etc.

    - Anyone who tries to resist this is called a "communist" (or maybe
    now they'll be called an "Al Qaeda sympathizer") and is subject to
    imprisonment, torture, and murder. These are people who've somehow
    gotten the crazy idea that a country's natural resources might
    actually be used to benefit its *own* citizens. They don't realize
    that their lot in life is to shut up and be cheap labor.

    - We force these countries to take out massive loans to buy our
    imported goods--loans they will never be able to repay.

    - In addition to providing the capital for the loans, U.S. taxpayers
    money goes into "aid packages" for these now destitute countries.
    The aid packages are earmarked for buying food and goods from
    western megacorporations. This is another way in which the system
    works to channel our money to the corporations.

    - If anyone gets out of line, we don't have a problem using weapons of
    mass distruction against their citizens (a million people have died
    radiation-related deaths in Iraq since 1991 because we rained
    thousands of tons of depleted uranium bombs and shells over the
    whole southern half of the country). After all, making us
    taxpayers support a massive military system (of historically
    unprecented size) is another major way in which the system feeds our
    money to the industrial complex.

    - On 9/11, some assholes out there (we don't have the monopoly on
    evil) manage to succeed in attacking the monetary system that rules
    the world. Over 3000 "collateral" casualties also result.

    - The response? Use this as a great excuse to (a) remove some more
    civil liberties from us (an educated, free-thinking populace is the
    *real* enemy of tyranny), and also (b) channel more of our money
    into our military machine.

    - Anyone who tries to point out any of the above is basically called a
    traitor. After all, "you're either with us or against us". As if
    even trying to understand what's going on is treasonous!

    If you are intrigued by any of this and want to investigate for
    yourself (don't believe me--I'm just regurgitating this stuff), you
    might like to look at John Pilger's new book "The New Rulers of the
    World", or any of his earlier stuff. Also, the copious writings of
    Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, and even Gore Vidal are great places to
    start.

    If you are unwilling to open your eyes, you'll probably just call me a
    "communist" or an "Al Queda sympathizer" (I am neither). While it
    shouldn't be necessary, I nevertheless feel compelled to stress that I
    do not condone the 9/11 attacks, nor do I think the people killed on
    that day "deserved to die", or that the terrorists were justified in
    doing it. I also think that it was counterproductive to their cause,
    as all violence is. I just wish people would be willing to see that
    we ourselves have been, and are again contemplating, waging extended
    campaigns of violence in the world that dwarf the events of 9/11. We
    still have a chance to change our ways.

    1. Re:Here's how it works: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fact this this is considered "insightful" thru slashdot moderation shows what a horribly broken, biased piece of shit system this is.

      flambait, offtopic, troll mods anyone?

    2. Re:Here's how it works: by solferino · · Score: 1

      congrats on yr post mate

      a little bit of reason in this sea of sentimental dross - was curious to what proportion of the comments on this story would be american 'patriotism' - depressingly it is prob 90%

      like i suspect many others i've decided it's not worth the effort to point out some home truths to people who would prefer not to listen - but i applaud your effort and appreciate that at there are at least a few posts like yours

    3. Re:Here's how it works: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You Sir are a complete idiot. I just so happen to live in a country (Poland) which was ruled by communist just 13 years ago and its largly thanks to the US government that I can sit in front of my computer instead of a line for north korean rice.

    4. Re:Here's how it works: by geekee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who modded this unsubstantiated bullshit up to a 5? I especially like the part about how we force countries to take our loans. That's pretty funny. I also like how he made up some crap about killing Irquis with radiation. When you realize capitalism works because it gives people the option to trade with each other freely, allowing buyers and sellers to come to an agreement about a product or service, and how it relates to the work they've done, you realize it's a lot more free system than a communist system, where your work is worth nothing and you have to beg the govt to recognise what you consider needs to survive.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
  369. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by eaolson · · Score: 1
    There's no way that human law can possibly carry out a "just" punishment against these people no matter what you do.

    You seem to be confusing justice with retribution.
  370. The Irish love to fight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    look at how they jeer and swear and shout at six year old girls walking to school. Real men. Look at how, even under the promise of peace, they can't bear to give up arms.

    Terrorists are cowards - they pick the softest, easiest targets - civilians. If you're hard men, go for the fucking military. Your grandfathers would spit on you if they knew how you choose to fight your wars.

  371. 29 years after September 11... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    September 11 (1973) US-backed coup overturns democratically elected government in Chile, leading to thousands of deaths, tortures and "disappearances"...

  372. I won't call you a communist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will call you liberal dickhead

  373. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    "One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter, or something like that."

    Yes, there are infinite shades of gray in between, but there is an absolute black and absolute white in the world. That's the basis for ideas like the Geneva Conventions and Hague Accords (two things that al Qaeda have actively sought to violate). After all, Hitler was just liberating the Fatherland from the Jewish scourge...

    "You are not doing them a favour by killing them."

    Yes, I am. That was my whole argument. Death by legal injection is likely the only humane solution to them.

    "How many old enemies are now willing to go that much further because of it?"

    Depends on the potential new enemies and how you kill them. Thought experiment: What if we happen to capture bin Laden alive? What if we put him on trial and then broadcast the trial live over Voice of America?

    I wonder if there would be so many anti-American zealots in the Islamic world today if their government-controlled media outlets let them, say, learn about how the US courts are bending over backwards to give Moussaoui a fair trial. If this were the Saudi legal system, he'd probably have been beheadded months ago.

  374. Big thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez! This thread is already bigger than the original /. article! (The original artile accumulated only 1215 posts in 24 hours, we're already up past 1250).

  375. Re:Don't let the terrorists win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    thou art exceedingly 1337 ;)

  376. My Account by betanerd · · Score: 0

    I live in Annapolis MD, about an hours drive away from the pentagon. I got up at about 8:15 and and proceed to get ready to go to school (AACC for those familiar with the area). I had my walkman with me at the time and heard the report that a plane had hit the world trade center. My first thought was of a crop duster sized plane. I thought that it seemed rather odd but didn't think to much of it as I went inside (and lost the radio signal) to go to class. As people and news trickled in to the room, the scope if what happened begin to set in. Getting in contact with people was an exercise in skill. My biggest concern was my mom who happens to work very close to the pentagon. After (finally) getting in contact with her i felt better. I called my job to tell everyone that I would most likley be late today, I was told don t bother they were closing early. Me and my family made it home ok. I tried to watch the news but after seeing so many talking empty heads i couldn't take it any more. I was pretty tired then anyway, so I want to sleep at about 4 pm that was my day. Looking back, the reaction of the government as well as mot people bothers me. "Don't bring em to justice, Send em to hell" Bumper sticker's sprung up everywhere (complete with bad grammar). Every hour someone was on TV proclaiming the start of WWIII. For the next week, TV degenerated (possible?) into little more than i giant play on everyones fears. I actually skipped church that week because I knew what the tone of the service would be.(Way more drama than I was ready for.) Everywhere i went there was some stupid yuppy discussing foreign policy like he was Colen Powell when in fact they were just regurgitating some BS they had heard on the Oriley Factor. For a truly great account of the events subsequent to September 11, Check out http://www.h2k2.net/panels.html Jello Biafra and Aaron McGruder give wonderful speeches on the topic.

    --
    Insert sig here (slashdot) Insert cig here (Lewinsky)
  377. an anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coward says love and peace

  378. A minute of Silence by dnaumov · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If you are still shaken by the horrifying scenes of September 11, please observe 2 minutes of silence for the 5,000 civilian lives lost in the New York, Washington DC and Pennsylvania attacks.

    While we're at it, let's have 13 minutes of silence for the 130,000 Iraqi civilians killed in 1991 by order of President Bush Sr. Take another moment to remember how Americans celebrated and cheered in the streets. Now another 20 minutes of silence for the 200,000 Iranians killed by Iraqi soldiers using weapons and money provided to young Saddam Hussein by the American government before the great eagle turned all its power against Iraq.

    Another 15 minutes of silence for the Russians and 150,000 Afghans killed by the Talibaan troops who were supported and trained by the CIA. Plus 10 minutes of silence for 100,000 Japanese killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the Atomic bombs dropped by the USA.

    We've just kept quiet for one hour: two minute for the Americans killed in NY, DC, and Pennsylvania, 58 minutes for their victims throughout the world. If you are still in awe, let's have another hour of silence for all those killed in Vietnam, which is not something Americans like to admit. Or for the massacre in Panama in 1989, where Americans troops attacked poor villagers, leaving 20,000 Panamanians homeless and thousands more dead. Or for the millions of children who have died because of the USA embargo on Iraq and Cuba.

    Or the hundreds of thousands brutally murdered throughout the world by USA-sponsored civil wars and coups d'etat (Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Bolivia, Guatemala, El Salvador to name a few).

    Now, let's talk about terrorism, shall we?

    1. Re:A minute of Silence by Cheeze · · Score: 2

      how about one second of silence for the one person they missed.

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
    2. Re:A minute of Silence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see a minute of rejoicing for you shutting your liberal face.

    3. Re:A minute of Silence by CrashRide · · Score: 1

      Fuck You. Dumbass.

    4. Re:A minute of Silence by togginho · · Score: 1

      ... and that's just the under-educated, self-centred, ignorant-towards-the-world-you-live-in kind of bullshit the world has to take from the americans. quod erat demonstrandum -- thanks for that

  379. An Interesting Perspective From Another Article by NeuroManson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/2002/09/05_S tepford.html

    September 5, 2002

    Stepford Citizen Syndrome: Top 10 Signs Your Neighbor is Brainwashed

    by Maureen Farrell

    Though much of the world is convinced the 2000 election was a coup d'etat, and many believe we're being lied to regarding 9/11, we Americans are unaware of how numb we seem. Not only are we being coerced into World War III, but at this very moment, unnamed souls are secretly locked away, the Army's drafted plans for civilian detention camps and there's a shadow government buzzing beneath our streets. And yet, we continue to ignore the oily elephant in the living room.

    The administration's Iraq war dance is likewise baffling, particularly when Dick Cheney says Saddam can't be trusted -- even though, not too long ago, he was trusted to the tune of $73 million during Halliburton/Iraq transactions. Moreover, newly discovered memos reveal that Cheney was also involved in a 1975 cover-up involving the CIA's mind-control experiment, MK-ULTRA. Back then, the government paid $750,000 restitution to Army biochemist Dr. Frank Olson's family, after admitting the CIA slipped Dr. Olson LSD days before his 1953 fall from a New York City building. When the Ford administration finally came clean, they promised they'd revealed everything. Yet according to an article in the "Mercury News," (Scientist's death haunts family, August 8, 2002) key officials, including White House aides Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld pushed to continue to conceal information.

    But not only has the government tried to control people's minds, they've copped to controlling the media, too. Operation Mockingbird, the CIA's plan to infiltrate America's newsrooms, was such a success that former CIA director William Colby boasted, "the Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any major significance in the major media." Carl Bernstein substantiated this, revealing that hundreds of journalists and news organizations were involved in this subversion. And though officials have admitted to planting fabrications in the past, it seems they're still at it. Remember the story about the terrorist's passport surviving the fiery crash into the World Trade Center? What could that be but government-issued pabulum? And what else but full-scale public brainwashing accounts for the rash of Stepford Citizen Syndrome spreading throughout the country?

    Which brings us to the case in point. Researchers have identified the following symptoms. If you overhear anyone making the following statements, assume they've been brainwashed and intervene immediately:

    1) "George Bush is a decent man."

    Abraham Lincoln once said, "[I]f you want to test a man's character, give him power." If he steals power, however, the nature of his character is no longer in question. This week's out of court settlement with the NAACP over Florida's foray into election fraud confirms BBC's Greg Palast's report that the election was rigged. Yet pundits ignore this travesty, while referring to Dubya's decency in much the same way our ancestors spoke of Earth's flatness. Overlooking our thrice-arrested president's blatant disregard for civil rights, human rights and the environment, they continue to downplay scandals and downgrade their role as protectors of the public trust. But with oft-repeated quips like, "lucky me, I hit the trifecta" and "if this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier," G.W. offers a glimpse at his indecent inner frat boy. Especially revealing was a Talk Magazine interview, in which he mimicked death row inmate Karla Faye Tucker. "Please," Bush whimpered, mocking Tucker's plea for clemency, "don't kill me." Gallows humor is only funny when those telling jokes don't have the power to save people from the gallows.

    2) "I have faith in our system of checks and balances."

    Certainly, the uproar over Operation TIPs and recent court decisions on FBI abuses and secret deportation hearings are healthy signs. Except, of course, that controversial findings against Ashcroft's Justice Department will most likely be appealed before the same felonious five who handed down the 2000 selection. Chief Justice Rehnquist has already warned that, "in times of war, the laws are silent." Then, too, though the Constitution grants Congress the sole right to declare war, since 1948, America has been involved in approximately 250 military incursions without one single declaration of war. The Bush regime has already said they don't need Congress' approval on Iraq. So much for checks and balances.

    3) "We have to defend ourselves, and the war on terrorism is the only way to do that."

    Anyone who believes this war is simply a drive to eradicate terrorism must be brainwashed. The U.S. has been building military bases along proposed oil pipeline routes, and has its eye on the oil and gas reserves in the Caspian Sea region. All anyone need do is read Zbigniew Brzezinski's "The Grand Chessboard" or brush up on the Wolfowitz Doctrine to understand the not-so-hidden agenda behind U.S foreign policy. In a recent appearance on Crossfire, Insight Magazine's Jamie Dettmer deftly addressed America's aim to control the oil fields in Iraq. "Nobody has suggested the United States is going into Iraq to control the oil," Tucker Carlson asserted, leaving some to wonder if Tucker's bow tie isn't too tight. "Let's not be unsophisticated about this," Dettmer replied, warning that, "in the end, if America doesn't restrain itself, [it's] going to provoke groupings of countries which will restrain America instead."

    4) "Since September 11, George Bush has shown strong leaderships skills."

    Since September 11, George Bush has led us away from progressive policies and alienated us from the rest of the world. British papers describe the biggest rift between Europe and the U.S. in more than 50 years, 85 percent of Germans no longer trust America, and veteran reporter Helen Thomas bemoans how, "friends and allies wonder what's happened to the United States." Our $7 trillion surplus has followed the president's example and gone AWOL, while unemployment, crime and intellectual numbness are on the rise. Under Bush's "leadership," the U.S. Has become the kid who picks his nose in class. Those of us who love America are embarrassed; others are repulsed.

    5) "Europeans don't agree with us because they're effete appeasers."

    Europeans don't agree with us because we're wrong. They understand the geopolitical motivations behind this war, as their press isn't as censored. In America, however, stories about Enron's involvement in the proposed oil and gas pipeline though Afghanistan were squashed, and if you wanted to know about the Taliban's trip to Texas, you had to learn about it in the National Enquirer rather than on Meet the Press.

    6) "George Bush's administration is filled with solid, foreign policy pros."

    Aside from Colin Powell, George Bush's cabinet is swarming with neo-conservative ideologues who'd be clamoring for an attack on Iraq even if the atrocities of 9/11 hadn't occurred. Despite the chorus of countries opposed, Dick Cheney unilaterally forges ahead, while Donald Rumsfeld says he's certain America will receive backing from the international community. Meanwhile, the international community scratches its head and wonders what's become of our once great nation.

    7) "George Bush is doing an excellent job in the war on terror."

    Given limited media coverage, how would anyone know? Unless one digs through foreign press and alternative media reports, there's little to go by. When one reads reports from journalists like Seymour Hersh, however, a different picture emerges. Stability in Afghanistan is but a myth, warlords carry out atrocities without intervention, and the State Department is forced to guard President Karzai. Meanwhile, many warn that Bush's plans for Iraq could lead to Armageddon. Yet "Bush is doing an excellent job in the war on terror?" How?

    8) "People who say the Bush administration 'let 9/11 happen' are conspiracy nuts."

    Forget the president's odd behavior on September 11. Ignore that jets weren't scrambled from Andrews Airforce base, or that the FBI reportedly thwarted investigations. Pretend there are no connections between the Bushes, bin Ladens and the Saudis or that Bush #41 doesn't profit from this war through his connections with the Carlyle Group. Imagine, for a moment, it doesn't matter that those heading the closed-door investigation into 9/11 met twice with the former Pakistan intelligence chief, who reportedly helped finance Mohammed Atta. And never mind that, despite warnings, only 14 planes were defending our mainland on September 11. These oddities could be explained through coincidence and incompetence rather than complicity.

    That said, remember this: After World War II, the CIA recruited Nazi scientists to share information later used in the aforementioned MK-Ultra program. In the '60s, the Pentagon drafted plans to kill American citizens and blame it on Castro as a pretext for war with Cuba. And Army-based concentration camps aren't merely a gleam in Ashcroft's eye. The brainwashed are conditioned to hear "conspiracy" and shut down, however, immediately deducing information isn't true and the messenger is daft. But even Bill Clinton reportedly asked Webster Hubbell to find answers to two questions: "One, who killed JFK? And, two, are there UFOs? " He never found out. And odds are we won't either. Even so, it's not crazy to demand an independent investigation into 9/11. Nor is it nuts to wonder why the administration is doing everything in its power to make certain we never uncover what went wrong.

    9) "The media is liberal."

    Ann Coulter complains about the liberal media through the "liberal media," where she's regularly given a forum, yet Michael Moore has appeared on less than a handful of shows, though his book's been a bestseller for six months. During the election, the corporately-controlled media portrayed Al Gore in a negative light, while touting Bush's phony ranch-hand charm, and according to a report in F.A.I.R (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting), 75% of the dominant sources of opinion on all three major networks are Republican. Yet the brainwashed continue to believe the media has a liberal bias. Go figure.

    10) "Saddam has weapons of mass destruction!"

    This phrase has replaced, "Saddam gassed his own people!" as the #1 mantra of war-mongering dittoheads. But despite former weapons' inspector Scott Ritter's assertion that there's no proof Hussein has amassed weapons of mass destruction, Dick Cheney says there's "no doubt" he's got them and plans to use them. During the Cuban missile crisis, John F. Kennedy relayed photographic evidence proving the Soviet Union was up to no good. Where's the proof now? Why hasn't the administration won over our allies? Why do so many doubt there is "no doubt?"

    Latest polls indicate that nearly half of all Americans believe the First Amendment "goes too far," proving that Stepford Citizen Syndrome is now a national crisis. We have an obligation to rouse our loved ones out of their stupor. If we don't, the thugs who've stolen America will steam-roll right over us. And if you can't see that, chances are, you're brainwashed.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  380. Date significance by slipmat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone know why the terrorists chose September 11? I haven't seen it discussed anywhere. I really don't think it is to do with the emergency phone number. I also don't think it had to be that day for logistical reasons. The date is likely to have religious significance. I have my own theory, Read verses "9-11" revelations chapter 14. http://www.awitness.org/biblehtm/re/re14.htm I'll summarise it. "Any who worship the beast will be tormented by fire...and the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever" Now read this http://www.lis.net.au/~dbird/ifanyworshipbeast.htm Note that the website was created before 09/11/2001, it explains that "the land of the beast" can be interpreted as the USA. I just find this all too much of a coincidence. No other group of verses in the revelations fit as perfectly as 9-11. btw I am not religious at all I just decided to do some research into the significance of the date and came up with the above.

    1. Re:Date significance by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      Wow.. what a great insight. Except for the fact that:

      A) The perpetrators were devout muslims, who have probably never read the Judeo-Christian bible. B) To them, since they don't follow the Western (Christian) calendar, it wasn't even "September" or "11th". It was some totally unrelated month/date in the muslim calendar.

      While the date may have had "religious significance" to the terrorists, you can bet the significance didn't come from the bible of the christian "infidel".

      what a maroon. Why don't you quote some Nostradamus for us next...

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

    2. Re:Date significance by ellem · · Score: 2

      Wrong

      The would have gone on 9-10 but the weather was no good for them they needed a clear day b/c they could not fly on instruments.

      Further they are Islamic and probably don't spend a lot of time reading the New Testament.

      You are a halfwit.

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
  381. a day that changed me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a European who used to love the us. In 1999, I graduated from an American High School. On Sept. 11th, 2001, I was staying with a good friend at his house in Chicago. A lot has changed since then. US Government policy has made me a fierce opponent of u.s. interests. The ignorance and undemocratic acts of violence and injustice make me believe, that the us has not leared anything. The "war on terrorism" has been the best possible example of what created the terrorist minds in the first place. Good look America!

  382. Last week's TIME was a pretty interesting read by melted · · Score: 1

    I laughed to tears on the essays that they've published. Don't get me wrong, I sincerely condole with Americans, I lost a few friends in Russia just because they were glad about what happened, but some of you (meaning Americans) sound funny sometimes. Looks like you should be taught history better and brainwashed less. You, for example, keep forgetting that Osama Bin Laden was born, raised and funded by CIA. That Taliban regime in Afghanistan was a direct result of US intervention into USSR's military action against them. We (meaning Russians) were doing the same that the US did this year, the only difference that this year nobody was supporting taliban. If we supported them, you'd still be fighting.

    And now these folks think that they can intervene freely into other countries' internal problems and declare war on whoever they want.

    Again, don't get me wrong, what was done in Afghanistan was a right thing to do, unlike in many other places on this troubled planet where there was absolutely no need in US intervention.

    And tying all this to Jews and Holocaust is FUCKING RIDICULOUS. I understand that Israel wanst to protect itself, but the kind of subliminal brainwash they're putting in the US press is just DISGUSTING.
    *

  383. Message to employers. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    Just heard on the radio that someone where I work (I am off today) wore a T-shirt with GW Bush's make no mistake quote as their tribute to 9/11. They were asked to take it off. My employer denies it, yet the person who wore the T-shirt is on the radio. First off, this is AMERICA! You CANNOT do that! If you ask your emplyees to dress patriotically, to some, it's easier ot go get a t-shirt. That's what they did. This is a totally PC move on their part and stupid beyond belief. I remember on the 12th I had brought some flags to stick on my monitor and my boss asked me why I brought them in (DUH!). AT the time I worked wiht a co-worker who was Islamic. I told him why and he told me I shouldn't have brought them in. I had a discussion with him an dhe realized that he had made a mistake Basically, I said I could take to HR about it if you want....he decided to be quite...that and the multitudes of stupid employers that were doing this were being riducled on the news and talk radio circuit. Funny thing was the muslim I worked with was not offended at all by it and she appreciated me bringing them in. People people people. We need to KILL politacally correctness. It's tearing the country apart. Noone is wrong because they hold a view different than yours and noone's opinion should be supressed. This is America and we have the right to say anything we damn well want! Be it print, a T-shirt, your car or truck or whatever.

    --

    Gorkman

  384. The Terrorists have Won!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO, you changed your behavior, now the Terrorists have won!! Won't somebody think about the children??

  385. Only in America...? by Cinematique · · Score: 1

    Only in America would we have personal liberties taken away under the guise of fighting the war on terror, or am I wrong? Surely, I am. Video game ban in Greece, anyone? There are other countries that pull this shit. America is not alone. Anyone that's reading this from Canada, a European Union country, China ( can they even read slashdot? ) or any other nation, really, thinking that your shit doesn't stink, wake up. Ignorance isn't bliss, it's a nightmare.

    But here's the real question: Why? What incentives are there for the leaders in OUR government to take away personal liberties? Do they get more money? Do they feel safer as a result? Are they power-crazy? Do they feel as if they're "doing something" instead of standing around "ignoring" an issue? It really boggles my mind. If someone can answer any of these questions for me, you'd earn my utmost respect.

    The thing that really blows my mind is how we have so many new laws as result of the attacks on 9/11. I don't feel any more secure due to them. So why were they enacted? I certainly don't feel any safer knowing that murder is a serious crime if I'm walking around alone at night in a seedy part of a town I've never visited before. And I don't feel any safer knowing airline passengers can't carry toe clippers onto 747s.

    There are two things I have learned from these attacks. Not only have I firmly cemented my anti-racist core, but furthermore, I have found, for lack of better words, that I am a "Logic Elitist." What's this, you ask? I have a strong hatred for those who can't backup their reasoning with sound, logical conclusions and reasoning. I hate stupid people.

    We shouldn't test people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed and love of power. -PJ O'Rourke

  386. because osdn ketp running them on sep 11 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot had ads all day that day or at least
    much of the day

  387. Truly sad. by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    "What luck for the rulers that men do not think."

    "The victor will never be asked if he told the truth."

    "Strength lies not in defence but in attack."

    "Success is the sole earthly judge of right and wrong."

    "The great masses of the people... will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one."

    It is an exercise to the reader to compare the some of the more prominant ideals in this "All-American" rant to the ideals of the man who made these statements I've quoted here.

    And unlike the original poster, I am not a coward.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Truly sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And unlike the original poster, I am not a coward.

      But you sure are an idiot!

    2. Re:Truly sad. by Kortec · · Score: 1

      Not a coward eh? then why isnt your /. account name your real name and your signature your address? Face it, we're all paranoid about out liberties getting yoinked so why not protect them a litte.

      --
      "My heart is in the work." - Andrew Carnegie
    3. Re:Truly sad. by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      You sir, make very little sense.

      Firstly, I suggest actually reading the whole
      post before blazing off on some self-righteous
      attempt to discredit it. Heaven forbid you
      should agree with some of it.

      Without even being so bold as to say you
      disagree with the original poster, you weakly
      attempt to associate his comments with Hitler,
      again, without being so bold as to say it directly.

      How does liking big tits and thinking MTV sucks
      warrant a comparision to Hitler? Hmm?

      He expressed his opinions, some of which I
      agree with, some of which I don't. Frankly,
      I think that people should be allowed to pray
      to whatever god or gods they want, and I'm
      glad I live in a country where I can say that
      without being put in prison.

      Even, and I want to make this absolutely clear,
      even if that means I have to put up with the
      opinions of knee-jerk idiots like yourself.

      Maybe you aren't a coward,
      but you are a fool.

      -Nick Robbins

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  388. Alas, you are both wrong. by IPFreely · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Mr. Hand has some nice statistics, but we know what they are worth.

    The reason Japan has not had any agression since WWII is not the pounding they got, it is because of the MARSHAL PLAN.

    Some history. After WWI, Germany was pounded into submission, millions killed, all infrastructure destroyed. Internaltional punishment was delt to them. They were oppressed. Germany was reviled, Their people hated world wide. Extremely horrible economic and emotional conditions.
    Question: Did that prevent them from starting another war?
    Answer: NO!

    After WWII, The Marshal plan was implemented in both Germany and Japan. This plan prevented either from building an Army. But it did help both rebuild their economies, their industries, their schools and hospitals. The US and allies spent millions of dollars rebuilding Germany and Japan into modern, capable and respected countries. No oppression. No punishment.

    Since then, neither has had any aggression of the type in WWII.

    So, by your logic, Germany should have been stopped after WWI. But they weren't, were they. The difference? Rebuild them, respect them. Don't give them an emotional reason to go to war.

    Now a question for you. If someone were to beat the crap out of you, a school yard bully (assuming you weren't the school yard bully). Would you sit and cower and pray he goes away, or would you plot vengence? Do you believe other people think any differently that you do on subjects like that?

    Learn some history. Learn some psychology. Become a better person.

    Peace be with you.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:Alas, you are both wrong. by McFarlane · · Score: 1


      WW1: Germany *not* pounded into submission (and punative Versailles treaty then imposed - leaders able to portray earlier German government as traitors)

      WW2: Germany pounded into submission (total loss of sovereignty and utter military defeat)

      2 very different post-war scenarios

      --
      [We don't come from a planet. We come from a grid sector.]
    2. Re:Alas, you are both wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany was pounded into submission after WW1. Why do you say otherwise?

    3. Re:Alas, you are both wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're just ignorant. The reason Germany wasn't stopped after WWI was because France and Britain PUSSED OUT, turned a BLIND EYE, and LET them rebuild themselves, which they did with amazing speed and competence.

      Not because they weren't rebuilt by sugar daddy nations.

      So by your logic we should give a shitload of money to bin Laden and his camels? Well, guess what? He *HAD* a ton of money before all of this! He was a little rich bitch. And the Taliban HAD shitloads of cash. They just didn't give a crap about the people they ruled, and siphoned it all out of the country for themselves.

      And I got beat up plenty. Yeah, I plotted vengeance. But what I DIDN'T do was firebomb his house or shoot his parents or siblings. Yes, people react (or overreact) differently to that sort of situation.

    4. Re:Alas, you are both wrong. by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2

      All true. But, it is important to note that the Marshal Plan took effect AFTER we beat the crap out of them. By some of the comments about how we should react to the current situation some peole seem to think it would have been a good idea to resond to Pearl Harbor with a Marshal Plan WITHOUT the intervening war.

    5. Re:Alas, you are both wrong. by balazsa · · Score: 1

      I think your picture is somewhat false Marshall Plan wasn't about humanity or respect.

      In fact it has been rather a basic momentum of the cold war (effectively it began just when US became the first nuclear superpower). The US were interested in a developed and strong western-europe and japan just to rebalance the soviet sweep in eastern-europe and asia. And to create the new world order the new allies had to be helped every possible way especially wiht lots of money.

      Do you think a poor and socially turmoiled europe and japan could stood long against the sweep of communism in the 50's? I think not, and that time that were the most important question and not humanity and respect, pure political interest and some "packaging" of course.

      --
      Is it right? Not?
    6. Re:Alas, you are both wrong. by IPFreely · · Score: 2
      That probably would have been useless.

      I'd bet that if we had implemented the Marshal Plan in Afganistan ten years ago when the Russians left instead of leaving them poor and ruined for ten years, they would not have fallen to the Taliban and subsequently been a host for terrorist.

      Marshal plan brings the poor and destitute up to modern health and abilities, thus releaving much of the desparation that supports extreamism. If a country is already powerful and is seeking domination, that is a different sort of problem.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  389. Regarding Osama bin Laden and the US.. misc 9/11.. by jbarket · · Score: 1

    One thing has been bothering me about our "search for Osama" or whatever.. assuming we did find him, wouldn't we have to produce hard evidence that he was behind 9/11? Now, don't get me wrong, I understand what we *know*, but what we *know* and what flies in some kind of court ruled by international law is totally different. I can't seem to recall anything where he claims responsibility, but rather that he's always just praising whoever did it. Assuming we found him, do you guys believe that we would have any idea? I personally think that we wouldn't be informed until after he was tried and executed by the military. It seems we're after Osama more for vengance than for our own safety at this point, so that just makes sense to me. --- Anyway.. I understand why today is very serious and all of that, but did America just forgot about 9/11 until a year later? It sure as hell seems like everybody decided to pretend it didn't happen and then just remembered today. I was not personally affected by these events of course, but I had coped with them fairly quickly. It was the first real attack on America from an outside force since Pearl Harbor as best as my memory serves me.. thousands died, and I do feel sorry for those who lost loved ones, but relative to the number of people who die every single day, or just when compared to the total number of people in this country, let alone the world, the number is small. If we continue to freak out about this and allow it to change us, then they've really suceeded. I mean, the point of "terrorists" is to terrorize, right? I mean, they scare the hell out of it, it's what they do. Well, apparently they did a damn good job since we're all freaked out as hell about all of this. I don't know.. just my thoughts for the day.

    --

    -----
    jonathan barket
  390. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Eccles · · Score: 1

    The U.S.'s war in Afghanistan has killed thousands of civilians.

    Don't claim this as documented fact, as it's not even close to one. In a conflict where the enemy does not conveniently dress in uniforms, it can be hard to tell the difference. But I do encourage you to read this:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/11/nationcha llenged /11AFGH.html

    I quote:
    'The joy of one group of 10- to 12-year-olds, sitting on the floor, was infectious, and a visitor had only to ask whom they credited for their change of fortune to set off a cheerful chorus.

    "America! America! America!" they cried, and then, "George W. Bush!"'

    'In Ghazni, the headmaster, Abdul Samad, 56, beamed as he listened to the girls bubbling with enthusiasm for America. But then took a visitor aside to offer a sober sentiment: "Please tell America we feel very sorry for happened on Sept. 11, because thousands of innocent people were killed. But please tell them, too, that Sept. 11, for us, was a starting point, and not the end.

    "This time, we need America to stay with us, and not to run away."'

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  391. All but forgotten... by UpLateDrinkingCoffee · · Score: 1

    Embarrassingly, a month ago I had almost forgotten... the flags were all gone, the banners taken down, the innocents killed were just a vague grey cloud in my mind... strangely today they are real again. The feeling I hold from that day a year ago is there are things out there that are much bigger than any one individual. Our only hope is to stand together and help each other in times of need. I pray that I remember that a month from now.

  392. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2

    You keep mentioning "these people" and how they all deserve death for "cheering" others death... Do you, in retrospect, also deserve death for cheering their death? One has to be very careful not to become just what they are fighting agasint.

    I think that you are missing one small but important point on this.
    Intent.
    There is a large gap between targeting a military complex and catching a few innocent people and directly targeting innocent people, who have no military value. While I will grant that the death of a non-military target civilian is sad, it is sometimes unavoidable in war.
    And please don't give me that crap about how we shouldn't be fighting wars, and there are no reasons for wars, that is bullshit. Because there are those humans that will try and subjigate others around them, it sometimes becomes necessary to take up arms and defend your soverigenty/freedom. I will grant that this is often taken too far, and that many wars are fought for some pretty bad reasons, but war is a necessity at times. If you are truly that against war, might I suggest that you go back to living your life as a serf for the Queen of England, and allow royalty to have full control over your life. Not I, thank you very much, I feel a lot of gratitude to the men and women that fought and died in the American Revolution.
    As for the death of non-military target civilians in a war, this should be avoided as much as possible. In case you missed it, the US military does a lot of work to this end. Its actually a side effect of good military tactics. First, there is the military intellegence, jokes about this being an oxymoron aside, consider the number of bombs that are dropped that do hit valid military targets, its a large number. The only ones that get press though are the ones that either miss, or were mis-directed. The people in MI are human, they screw up, but at least they are trying. Second, dropping bombs on non-miltary targets is a waste of ordanace, it costs money. Not to mention the obvious poilitical ramifications. If the US didn't care about minimizing civilian casualties it would have given up on expensive Laser/TV/IR guided bombs. We can mass produce 500lbs bombs, load up B-52's and carpet bomb a good sized country out of existance. But its not done.
    Am I cheering the deaths of the people that our military kills? No, I think its sad that mothers are losing thier sons. However, I am cheering the destruction of the organizations that they are fighting for. If there was an efficent way to bring this all to an end, and not have to kill anyone, I would be all for it. But, I haven't seen one. War, while undesirable, is often the quickest means to peace. If you have a better solution, post it. Diplomacy isn't working. Not getting involved in the Middle East? A nice idea, afterall the Kurds are of no concern to us, better to let the different tribes in the Middle East kill each other off, and then we can deal with the winners. Along the same lines, we should never have gotten involved in the war in Europe. We should have stood by the sidelines waited for the dust to settle, and then started working out trade agreements with the Third Riech. Isolationism, that's the ticket, the US says, "screw the rest of the world, we're not getting involved."

    Personally I'd like to know real reasons on why the USA is so hated by so many people across the globe, and don't tell me its becasue "they hate our freedom", its a wonder every time i see GWB say that with a straight face.

    I agree that the "they hate our freedom" excues is BS. If you're interested KFI AM640 actually interviewed a top member of a British group that is celebrating the positive outcomes of the 9/11 attacks today. It really was rather enlightening. According to the person interviewed, its not the US, freedom or any other such ideal that is under attack, but instead its any system of law created by man, and not god given. They usually keep some of thier stuff online for a while, and the interview may be there. Listening to this guy was really interesting, he was well spoken, and polite, he wasn't a screaming idiot.

    I think this whole issue is a Lot more complex than having a simple "kill them all" solution. If we are supposed to be the most advanced and cultured society in the history of the earth, i'm sure we can do better than that.

    Why is it that everyone seems to have this "Star Trek" view of what an 'advanced' society should be? Sometimes the old way of doing things is still the best. I would like to have a better solution than "kill them all", and I think there might be one, but I'm not for standing by and getting beaten up while trying to figure it out. Go back to the 80's the US was being attacked relentlessly by terrorists under Kadafi. It was decided that enough was enough and a couple of strike aircraft went to visit Kadafi's home. Shortly after that the attacks on US soil abated. It was brutal, but it stopped the attacks in a very short time span.

    War has its place, and no amount of whining that we should be an 'advanced', ala "Star Trek", society is going to change that. If you aren't willing to fight for your rights, then you deserve to be a slave. I agree that a non-violent solution would be wonderful, but I haven't seen someone put one forward yet that has a snowball's chance in hell of succeding. If you can prove me wrong, please do so. I don't like violence, but I do feel that when it comes time to use it, it should be as efficent as possible. The only deterent I have ever seen to a war is a strong show of force. Both the US and the USSR won in the cold war, neither side suffered the massive destruction that nuclear weapons promised. And that was because both sides knew that the other side was too well armed to attack. So for now, the only thing I can see that has a possibility of stopping the terrorist attacks on the US is to make it obvious that attacking the US is just going to get you killed. Especially the leaders and planners of the attacks. They are the ones that need to be killed. Most of the people that carry out the suicide attacks do not have the means to plan, and execute them on thier own, they have to rely on the people that sit in the background and send them to thier deaths.
    Yes, I am all for targeted assassinations of terrorist leaders. In the end its a very percise way of dealing with a military threat. Will it occasionally get the wrong person? Yes, that is a fact of war, it sucks, but its part of this whole war thing. But, it still beats the hell out of an all out war, it comes down to numbers at that point. In an all out war you are going to have pretty high non-military civilian casualties, in a bungled assassination, you will have only a handful.

    --
    Necessity is the mother of invention.
    Laziness is the father.
  393. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you remember the dates Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed?

  394. Collateral damage by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    It's irrelevant if you are actively targeting civilians or not, if you end killing civilians no matter if you regret it, YOU ARE KILLING CIVILIANS.

    Examples: The bombing of the wedding party, the attack in may against a small village in Afganistan, in wich american troops killed a 85 year old "gunman", the dettention of all males and the subsecuent pillage of the defenseless village at the hands of a gang of bandits, this will make the afgans very thankful of their american saviors.

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    1. Re:Collateral damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to the DELIBERATE action of flying plane loads of people into civilian buildings.

      This is a war. The cowards in Afghanistan surround themselves with civilians and hide within them exactly for the purpose of then having a hue and outcry about civilian deaths. If you give in to this, then you have no strength and they know it. They will then continue to attack you with impunity. This is unacceptable.

      The innocent civilians who die while forced to be shields for these animals are very regretable but if I were in their place, I would gladly pay that price to rid the earth of such vermin.

  395. Im sick of hearing about it. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    After a year of constant barrage about it.. i dont want to hear another thing. I am SOO f-ing tired of hearing 9-11 this 9-11 that..

    Yes it was a tragedy and shouldn't be forgotten, but its been beaten to death to the point its just a marketing angle.

    Its sick. its sad. Its gotta stop. Enough Already.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  396. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by karmawarrior · · Score: 1
    (btw, I don't consider atheism a religon. That's like calling anarchy a form of government)
    I'm sure you're right. But then monotheism isn't a religion either, that's like calling government a form of government.

    I'm a secular humanist. I don't believe in God, and secular humanism doesn't have one. Any reasonable person would, however, describe it as a religion. So stick that up your TBN antenna and smoke it.

    --
    KMSMA (WWBD?)
  397. where I was last year by gandalf23atwork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A year ago I was on a boat in the Al Jafad dry dock in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. We'd just gone up to the bridge to use the cell phone (better reception up there). One of the guys, Walt, was talking to his wife when she said that a plane had hit the world trade center. She had no other information, we just assumed some Cessna pilot got lost or flew too close, and we were not too worried. A few minutes later we went downstairs to the mess for dinner and turned on the TV. That's when we saw the second plane hit, and we knew we were in deep shit.

    Quite frankly I was very worried about our safety. We stayed on the boat for about two days. The US consulate was closed, so there was no where for us to go to if we got in trouble. We sat for hours in the mess watching CNN with the sound off. We later found out that the sound was off because the government of the UAE was censoring the broadcast. This was a new experience to me, but not to the guys on the boat. I was outraged, but they would say "Mr. Mike, they do this to protect us. Obviously the people are telling lies or speaking bad about Islam, otherwise they would be allowed to speak." And they were serious. Luckily CNN was running text along the bottom of the screen, so we were able to get a decent idea of what was going on.

    We saw on CNN the joyous celebrations all over the world, so when we did finally leave the boat I made sure I had a flare gun (I stole one from the bridge) and a 6 inch chefs knife from the kitchen with me, in addition to my usual pocketknives (a Bob Lum Spyderco and a Leatherman Side Clip). I also made sure that the other guys were armed with knives as well (mostly 4 inch Opinels). Non-citizens are not allowed to own/possess guns, stun guns, or pepper spray in the UAE, so knives were all we could carry legally to protect ourselves should the need arise.

    It felt odd when we'd go out. Even before the attacks we stood out as we were all taller than the vast majority of the population and we were obviously foreigners, both in dress and face. For two months after the attacks, up until the time we went into Afganistan, people would come up to me on the street and ask if I was an American. At first I did not know what to say, so that first day I said I was a Texan. Most people did not know what a Texan was, but assumed I was not American, so they would then go on about how terrible the attacks were and there was an urgency when they spoke when they'd tell me that Islam was not the cause, that the men who did this were madmen. One very nice older Arabic man had been to Texas, and when I told him I was Texan he hugged me and cried, it was very touching. He and most people I met were outraged at the attacks, furious that men did it in the name of Islam, and worried that the US would destroy the world in retribution. Everyone asked if I knew anyone lost in the attacks, and asked about my family.

    Of course, many people I met, including all of the Arabs on the boat with us, were convinced that it was an Israeli attack. As one crewman put it, "It is against Islam to murder innocents, therefore no Muslim could do this. It must be the Jews." I was shocked at this attitude but did not know how to respond to it. Later on when it became more clear that it was indeed Bin Laden's group, the same guys said, "It is too difficult, what they did. Only a nation could do this, not one man or a few men. It must have been Mossad or China, no Arab could plan this." This was kinda funny, because all the Arabs on the boat were lazy fucks, and I certainly could not see any of them planing a good meal let alone a simultaneous hijacking. However, this was not proof, yet they accepted it as such. They firmly believed that if they could not do it, then no other Arab could. This was an attitude that I would find not only on the boat but all over, and is one that still perplexes me.

    When US troops went into Afganistan, I became real worried. No longer did people smile and stop me on the street to express their condolences over the attacks. Instead I got angry glares and scowls. I went back to carrying the flare gun and chefs knife in my backpack we I went out. Several people spat at me. Luckily nothing happened, although I did have one Afghani challenge me to a duel. He had a sword, which he had drawn, but I had just purchased a very large Pakastani meat cleaver. It weighs about 10 pounds and is huge. (I figured it'd be good for dressing game) So I took the cleaver out of my pack and said, "Ok." His sword was a crappy one, like one of those you'd see in a sharper image catalog for $40, so I wasn't too worried. I figured I'd whack him upside the head with the flat of the blade and knock some sense into him. A large crowd had gathered, and luckily nothing happened. We agreed to be friends even though our countries might not be. I tried to explain, and I think I did get through to him, that the US was not pissed at Afghanis, that we were after Bin Laden and the Taliban was protecting him. If the Taliban gave him up we'd leave Afghanistan alone. He did not like the Taliban, that's why he was in Dubai and not Kabul, but he had family back home and was worried. The whole situation got better a few days later when it was announced that the US was dropping food and supplies all over Afghanistan, but still the scowls and frowns remained.

    After visiting the middle east, I realize how much better off most Americans are than the rest of the world. Especially in the stuff we take for granted, like freedom of religion and of the press. I was not allowed to hear certain things nor was I allowed to say anything bad or even remotely construed as being negative about the government in the UAE. Not just, "don't say that," but the police would come and take me away. The secret police are everywhere and you never know who is listening. My entertainment was censored. Books, newspapers, magazines, CDs, video games, and movies are all censored before they are allowed to be released (for example the whole subplot about the arab arms dealer in the brad Pit movie Spy Game was removed). I was not allowed to practice my religion. I was forbidden to bring a bible in to the country, or to wear a cross around my neck, and there are only about 4 or 5 churches in the entire country (and just try finding a taxi that'll drive you to one of them). I was not allowed to eat what I wanted, nor drink what I wanted. Not that I'm a big drinker or a big pork eater, but after a few months I really wanted to sit down, watch an American Football game, drink a beer, and eat a plate of bacon.

    Anyway, now here I am a year later, back in the states. Every flight I've taken since last September I've been searched by hand, my luggage has been searched by hand, and once in Amsterdam our flight was delayed while they pulled out my luggage and made me go through it while a bunch of nervous guys with MP5s and Glocks watched. I gotta tell you, though, that all that did not make me feel safer, in fact it made me feel less safe. I can't help but think that a semi-determined terrorist/hijacker could still very easily get a weapon on board, but I, and most of the other passengers, would be completely disarmed as we are law-abiding, and this would make it much more difficult to stop the hijacking. A sharpened piece of glass, plastic, or stone will not be detected by any metal detector, but it would be a very effective cutting instrument.

    So what am I doing a year later? Not much. I watched some of the ceremony in New York and Washington. Here at the office I've been listening to NPR all day. I took off early for lunch and went to a memorial service at my church. I'm usually not big on songs, mainly as my voice just sucks, but today we sang one I don't remember ever singing before. #437 in the Methodist hymnal, "This is My Song." I thought the words were very nice, and appropriate, and well, here they are.

    This is My Song
    Lyrics: Lloyd Stone
    Music: Jean Sibelius

    This is my song, O God of all the nations,
    a song of peace for lands afar and mine.
    This is my home, the country where my heart is;
    here are my hopes, my dreams my holy shrine;
    but other hearts in other lands are beating
    with hopes and dreams as true and high as mine.

    My country's skies are bluer than the ocean,
    and sunlight beams on cloverleaf and pine;
    but other lands have sunlight too, and clover,
    and skies are everywhere as blue as mine.
    O hear my song, thou God of all the Nations,
    a song of peace for their land and for mine.

    After work I plan on stopping by the indoor gun range and putting a lot of holes into a bin laden target (http://www.reloadbench.com/photo/obl8x11.jpg). I went to an outdoor range this past Saturday but didn't get to spend much time shooting. Then I'll go home, hug my family, call the ones I can't hug, maybe go get a beer with some friends.

    -Gandalf23

  398. Some responses by kimota · · Score: 1

    >9/11 has nothing on Pearl Harbor, the way I see it most of the country isn't going to be affected much by the war on terrorism.

    Interesting that you say this; a co-worker pointed out to me at lunch how on December 7, 1942, there weren't many commemorative activities for the anniversary of Pearl Harbor. Americans were too busy fighting a war!

    >The show of pride in America seems to be a shallow gesture.

    Yes, and no. There are plenty of shallow people in America. What else do you expect? Then there are plenty whose sense of patriotism isn't revealed by wearing red, white and blue today or desecrating the American flag by displaying one of those rapidly decaying flags on their car. A friend of mine who was being pressured to buy and wear a commemorative flag pin at his work responded by saying "I don't have to wear a flag pin to be proud of my country, and I was patriotic *before* September 11th!" Such people aren't well represented, particularly in the media.

    >Nobody is banding together, or making sacrifices for their country they weren't before, except of course the armed forces involved.

    That's a big "except." I know people who couldn't but wished they could go into the military to support their country. I know others that are going into the reserves, and there have been plenty of reports of the military having to turn people away for being too old, etc. I was hoping to support the new Homeland Security department until I saw it in a more cynical light. Also, the first time on September 11th last year that I started to tear up was when I saw how in about two hours' time, a van service had been set up at my university to get people to and from the blood bank. We've all heard how the Red Cross ended up with more blood than they knew what to do with. Granted, I don't know how many of those people are still regularly donating, but I'm hoping it's noticeably more than pre-9/11/01.

    Alternately, we Americans are ALL letting our politicians sacrifice the Constitution in response to September 11, 2001, aren't we? If that's not big enough for you, what would be?

    > I would rather see Americans love their neighbors than flags everywhere.

    Good point. In all the ramping up to today's media event, I've seen no reminders of how many non-Americans died in the attacks or of the compassion we initially received from a tremendous number of sources (Britain referring to us as their offspring, playing the American national anthem at the changing of the guard, the Russian town that held a funereal procession, the German(?) submarine that rose to lets its sailors salute our Navy, etc., etc. (Unfortunately, I have no sources for any of these; most of them were anecdotal. I'm hopeful they were in fact true.) It'd be nice if the media would manufacture an international day of thanks when countries could, um, give thanks to each other for their support throughout the generations....

    --
    Who moderates the meta-moderators?
  399. A wish... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I wonder if maybe we were all the same things would be different. It's some big cosmic joke, our creators and the natural processes therein find beauty in diversity, but we as a species do not. We hate all that is different and as groups strive to render our species into a physical/spiritual/theological singularity. I wonder where we would be as a world if our urges to dominate and repress were replaced with a willingness to cooperate and celebrate our species diversity. We are all different, but we are all the same. We in a tick of a second on the cosmic clock have changed this world for better and for worse. Where this path will lead us, nodoby knows. What we do know, but dare not contemplate is that we will be our own unmaking. Despite all our technology, our own hatred of each other will consume our minds and energy and waste them on futile fighting while the world slips from beneath our feet. The tragety is that we fight over gifts, given by a roll of the cosmic dice. I hope that as a species we all see the futility and short sightedness of our actions (or the actions of those who don't have the best interest of our species in mind). One day, I hope to build a space ship and leave this land of hatred and bigotry and find a place were people can find harmony.

    Too bad it's a bit of a pipe dream, but we can always have hope. Those of the world can steal my freedom, kill my family and poison my water, but they can't take my hope away.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  400. Re:The Events You Equate Were Fudamentally Differe by retards · · Score: 1

    It's true that Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, etc. we're different in the way you specify from an American point of view. I'm sure those who are behind the recent attacks on America have plenty of excuses for their agression, just like you seem to have for your countrys acts of murder. They probably think they are fighting a war so terrible and important that these atrocious acts are acceptable means to an end.

    The point I was trying to make is that the events of last September do not make the Top Ten list of crimes against humanity. So bollocks to this Political Correctness around the whole fucking thing. If this had happened in some African country it might not have even made it to the news. Did they play the Rwandan national anthem everywhere after the massacres there? Hardly.

    Besides, I never said that Americans are biggots per se, but the American government and as it is percieved through the media certainly is.

    "Everyone who isn't with us is against us!"

  401. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To start with, try the BBC

  402. Light two candles for today by billions+and+billion · · Score: 1
    I still feel great sadness when i see the film clips and see the pictures from the horrible and tragic day one year ago.


    Even though we are proud over our civilization, we are still animals.
    Despite the Dark Ages turned a bit brighter when the Age of Enlightenment (Rennaissance) changed the world long ago, it's still a bit dark.
    Religion, superstition and fundamentalism makes up the darkness in our world.
    Science, logics, reasoning and liberty are the candles that are still burning, fighting off the darkness.
    Terrorism threatens to blow out the candles.
    Friendship, understanding and tolerance are yet other candles being lit.

    We need more oxygen for these candles...
    We need more candles...
    ...before it's too late and the darkness wins. The darkness wont let you see. If you can't see, you can't think your own thoughts. If you have no thoughts of your own, you're dead. We're all dead.


    Light two candles for today:

    1. One real candle that burns with a flame, and
    2. One candle which is you doing something good for a fellow man/woman. It could be anything, from helping your friend move to a new apartment, to comfort a child who's lost and can't find his mom. Or, why not just give someone a smile.


    Great words by Carl Sagan:

    ... Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there - on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
    The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors, so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

    Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.

    The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.

    It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.
  403. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by firebat162 · · Score: 1

    I don't think anybody is beyond hope. How would you feel if you did a major crime and people told you that you were beyond hope, and it's probably better for you if they killed you anyway (rather than trying to rehabiliatize you)?

  404. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by junkgrep · · Score: 2

    ---*every* religion believes in a god,---

    Buzz... no. Buddhism is a religion. So is Taoism. Neither necessarily involve any gods. And indeed, that religions have gods doesn't mean that they think their gods rightfuly determine who lives and who dies. Pantheists don't even necessarily think their god (existence) even has a mind.

    ---btw, I don't consider atheism a religon. That's like calling anarchy a form of government---

    Agreed: but I like this one better: "it's like calling bald a hair color."

  405. Today's US politicans still need some training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until they can reach the doctor's performance. Dr. Goebbels was a genius. Bush is too low IQ to compete with that skinny man.

    Eternal Freedom!
    Unlimited Justice!
    Vivat Empirium Romanum!

  406. How about April 12th 2002? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US already attempted a "regime change" in Venezuela this year. This "regime change" was an effort to install a leader that would privatize Venezuela's oil industry. Privatization would allow foreign investors to manipulate the price of oil. Venezuela is an OPEC country so this would have a world-wide effect (imagine Enron on a global scale). If I remember correctly Venezuela broke the oil embargo in the 70's.

    To bring us back on topic... The US government does a lot of awful things like this that the people of the US would not approve of. There is no reason a democratic government should be overthrowing other governments. This war, like the war on drugs, is a racket and a sham.

    There are a lot of unanswered questions about 9/11. All we can do is continue to search for answers to the questions of who stood down that day and who is making money off this.

  407. White American Man Month by Fastball · · Score: 1, Troll
    A poem written by me.

    Everybody else has a month but me. Until now.
    I declare July to be "White American Man History" month.

    We will commemorate the accomplishments of white American men:
    Democracy, railroads, automobiles, airplanes,
    television, highways, and the Internet.

    And that's just infrastructure. Let's not forget:
    Socket wrenches, Dirty Harry, the fast break,
    pizza delivery, Harley-Davidsons, and scoreboards.

    Contrary to popular belief and NBC Dateline stories,
    not all white American males wear pinstriped suits
    and neckties and brainstorm ways to ass fuck the
    tired, poor, and huddled masses.

    No, there are white American men among us making it
    for themselves and others,
    and they enjoy the ride to boot.

    So July 1, crack open a cold beer,
    put some burgers and dogs on the grill,
    find a ball game on TV,
    and revel in all that white American men have achieved.
    The party is getting started and I have sparklers to spare.
    Just don't ask me to dance.

  408. I was fortunate.... by munition · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was fortunate.

    I did not live in New York.
    I did not live in D.C.
    I did not lose anyone that day.
    At least, anyone I personally knew.

    I did, however, lose many people that I did not know. These people were not just all Americans. They were from all over the world. These people represented different ethnicities, religions, regions, businesses, families, etc.

    I lost joy in seeing family member after family member holding pictures of their loved ones, wondering if anyone has seen them.

    I felt helpless seeing the building collapse, knowing that all I could do is whisper a simple prayer.

    I felt torn between my thought of religious tolerence and a new feeling of hatred towards the people who did this in the name of religion.

    Yes, I was fortunate.

    I married my wife two months and twenty-two days early because her father had been called to active duty. She wanted to make sure that Daddy could see her walk down the aisle.

    I help my wife night after night while she cried. We both worried together about my father-in-law. World events left us unsure about what he would really be doing on his mission.

    But I was fortunate.

    I remember sitting in my home office when an email came from my mother. Something terrible had happened. I rushed to the living room, turned on CNN, and watched as the world seemingly crumbled around us.

    I remember my class being cancelled by the professor. My friends and I headed for a dorm room to watch the unfolding events.

    I remember the moment of silence in my next class.

    I remember the solemn faces of my peers in my last class of the day.

    I remember the tribute our university band did for the fallen that next Saturday. I remember being a part of that ensemble.

    Yet, I was fortunate.

    I renewed my relationship to God. I put my family first. I no longer found material things worth my time. Instead, I found life and the lives of those around being worth my time. I found that love and being loved was the most wonderful feeling in the world. How easy it is to forget this when one is busy.

    Yes, I was fortunate. 9-11 opened my eyes, my heart, and my life. It changed me, forced me to do more, and made me be a better person.

    Mourning the loss of life,

    --
    MunITioN
    "A mind is a terrible thing to lose"
  409. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the american firebombings of germany and
    the second a-bomb in japan. These were terror attacks, make no mistake about it.

  410. That's nice and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before we can "unite" we have to kill the fuckers that are dividing us.

  411. We belong here..with the rest of us.. by cOdEgUru · · Score: 2

    I remember then, as I watched the towers being hit and then tumbling down, thousands of candles being snuffed out, screams swallowed by the roar of concrete shattering, and I ran to this site, to read what others like me were feeling, the outrage, the sadness, the joy that no one we knew were affected, knowing how puny we really are yet find that hard to believe, no matter how different we all seem to be. I felt at home here with all of you, knowing that my fears, my tears, my joy, my sorrow were all being shared with the rest of us.

    I decided today not to watch TV and just let the day go as usual. But I felt that I should come back here, to read, to understand, to discuss, to reflect, to contemplate the thousands of souls who lost their lives here and abroad. I mourn the deaths of every single person who died that day and I mourn with their families and the families of the young men who believed they were making a point. I would never want my son, my brother or my father to be in that position and my heart goes out to their families too.

    I am glad that we all made it here today.

    God Bless.

  412. Who's this 'we', paleface? by Apuleius · · Score: 2

    The Ku Klux Klan engaged in terrorism in the 50's and 60's because they felt they had no alternative. Should the US have made the KKK feel secure? Should the US have given the KKK a way to exist without desparation? It's a moot point now. The US decided to take the opposite approach. They made the KKK not only feel insecure, but feel utterly hopeless. And thus KKK terrorism stopped. I prefer that approach to yours.

    1. Re:Who's this 'we', paleface? by iabervon · · Score: 2

      I thought the US put all the KKK members on police forces in metropolitan areas. That certainly counts as making them feel more secure...

      But seriously, I think it was largely that there stopped being new civil rights for minority races. If the laws have been the same for a while, and nothing really bad has happened to you because of them, you're not really going to be that desperate. Not the actual KKK members, but the potential KKK members, people who would commit terrorism if they thought the people they cared about were about to be driven into poverty.

      I think that the US's response to the KKK reduced the damage greatly, and was very important for that reason, but that its momentum was largely broken by economic conditions reaching the post-civil-rights-movement equilibrium, such that the future wasn't frighteningly different from the present, and the present turned out to be survivable. At that point, leading a regular life feels like a good alternative to blowing things up.

  413. Shut up already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Slashdot'd stayed true to its slogan, this wouldn't even be here. News for whiners.

  414. A look to America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One year after 11/9/2001 what has changed?

    - Americans lost most of their rights. Your goverment has de jure and de facto given it selfe the power to revoke allmost all human rights from it's citizents.

    - The U.S. conquered Afghanistan - an important strategic location in the middle east. Now you have military bases there. Based on some talks you have judged and covicted a nation, and occupied it.

    - Thanks to the war american defecne idustry is thriving, exports in defence contracts are also rising, and profits are going up. Also attention is successfully being diverted from home ecconomics, allowing for various manipulations.

    - You are preparing to do the same to Iraq. Again, with no proof.

    In both cases you are clearly revoking the rights of those people to live in the way they chose to - just based on the claim that it's not democratic. Well, since you don't care about the right's of YOUR citizents I guess it makes sense - but remember - democracy also includes the right to live in an Islam state - if you choose. Or in a totalitarian.

    On the other hand you refuse to take a look to who could have profitted from this act - of even to make ANY investigation in your own contry. You just blame the "terroists" without even thinking about trivial stuff like how could this have happened without help from the inside...

    To me, as someone who lives in Europe, this lookes like you've been, once again, framed by your own goverment... Yet you refuse even to consider it.

    God bless America... You'll need it.

    1. Re:A look to America by Pomple · · Score: 1

      That makes sence. Alot of it actually.

  415. Killing star fraction by Perdo · · Score: 2

    Only 600 posts to go.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  416. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "You seem to be confusing justice with retribution."

    Neat trick, considering how I'm not talking about either. Both are a lost cause in this case, unless you are a religious person who believes in "divine justice/retribution/whatever."

    I consider capital punishment in this case to be euthanasia. They can't be allowed to continue the way they are unchecked and any other alternative is essentially torture.

  417. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "Do you remember the dates Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed?"

    The need for the use of the atomic bombs on Japan in August, 1945 can be seen in the way that two were required.

  418. Reasoned, intelligent, and graceful. by Apuleius · · Score: 2

    Hint #1: the war in Afghanistan was not a "so-called" war. It was, and is a war. "So-called" isn't a phrase to be casually added to things you don't like. Hint #2: if you think there was no evidence giving cause to this war, you clearly have not been keeping up with the news. Hint #3: the state of war with Iraq begun in 1991 never ended. There is still a war on. No need for the scare quotes. And W's main reason for wanting it done is to get it over with beore Saddam ets some new toys. Hint #4: The legalities behind Lindh and Padilla's handling are indeed controversial. But the charges are not at all spurious. Hint #5: Nothing wrong with Guantanamo. The inmates live more comfortably than their guards there. Hint #6: The US has as much right to effect regime changes as every other country that has set out to do such things. It's a jungle out there. Hint #7: the Middle East is actually improving right now. It's been a while since the last suicide bombing, and Hamas is almost defunct. Then again, in your view that might be a worsening. Hint #8: if as far as you can see, this war effort is motivated by revenge, then you are quite myopic. Hint #9: those international criminal courts have are lacking in the same constitutional safeguards whose erosion you complained about earlier. The US is right to oppose them.

  419. Hats off slashdot by rsgopi · · Score: 1

    I am impressed by the fact that slashdot turned off banners today. I have to say one thing. I expected to see today a lot of cars with flags. But boy, i am disappointed. This shows how quicky we are in forgetting history.

  420. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "I don't think anybody is beyond hope. How would you feel if you did a major crime and people told you that you were beyond hope, and it's probably better for you if they killed you anyway (rather than trying to rehabiliatize you)?"

    Not familiar with the concept of triage yet, are you? I envy you. I'm not saying that it's all fun and games, I'm saying it's something that needs to be done.

    Since this is ultimately something that needs to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis, how about the case in question? How would you try to rehabilitate someone who holds so little value in human life as to kill several thousand in a single act and then laugh about it later? What can possibly be done for someone that can organize what happened on 9/11 and then continue to sleep soundly at night? I see no self-doubt in bin Laden at all and I don't believe there's a cure for that.

    My saying this probably won't hold much sway with you, but if I were in bin Laden's shoes, I certainly hope someone would kill me.

  421. And still they dance.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    One year later, a barbaric, evil culture still wants to celebrate.

    Dancing in the streets a year ago wasn't enough for the only culture in the entire history of mankind that publicly celebrates mass murder. They want to do it again a year later.

  422. Re:Puleeze! by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

    The first thought that popped into my head was not about the horror of the event or even those who dies but rather a disturbed feeling that this is the start of a long erosion of everyone's rights

    The first thought that popped into my head when I read this post is "damn, what a selfish, insensitive person." People are dying, lives are being changed forever, and the first thought has nothing to do with the horror but with the erosion of liberties?

    Today, a year later, I don't feel much grief for those 600 or so foreign nationals and the one American who faces military justice. They'll still see a more fair justice system than they would in their native countries, or in Padilla's case the country he chose as his new home.

    Giving up a little freedom (and I haven't noticed losing any) is a sacrifice I am willing to make until this thing is over. And compared to the sacrifices that police and rescue in NYC made last year, well it doesn't even compare and it is just unbelievably selfish to even try.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  423. Look in the mirror by RgnadKzin · · Score: 0

    Who created bin Laden?

    Who created Saddam Hussein?

    Who created the Shah of Iran, which gave rise to the Islamic takeover of Iran?

    Who created Noriega?

    Look in the mirror.

    Each of the above were created and installed into power by western intelligence (sic) agencies.

    What do you expect bin Laden to do after we teach him to fight the commies in Afghanistan and then turn our backs on him?

    What do you expect him to do after he gets bombed in a wag the dog because of a stained blue dress?

    The pendulum of a half century of foreign interventionism is swinging back.

    The beast has come home to roost.

    --
    Liberty is not a concept... Liberty is a way of life!!!
    1. Re:Look in the mirror by goreking · · Score: 1

      idiot. that's so simple. so easy to believe. where are you from, france?

      --
      No...it's okay...I wasn't using my Civil Liberties anyway
    2. Re:Look in the mirror by RgnadKzin · · Score: 1

      Kansas

      http://www.house.gov/paul/cr090502.htm

      --
      Liberty is not a concept... Liberty is a way of life!!!
    3. Re:Look in the mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess, slashdot people really knows this IP thing.

      So, what would happen if they filtered non American Ip's posting on this particular story?

      There is a huge moderation cencor here, shame on you.

  424. --- http://www.worldviews.org/ by maody · · Score: 1

    for some facts and figures on the attitudes of the American and European public on a range of foreign policy issues post-September 11.

  425. God Bless America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our Home, Sweet Home.

  426. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Lars+Clausen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In short (too late!), American culture is taking over the world. We aren't forcing it, people choosed what they like. Other cultures are getting forced out and feel threatened. The resulting fear turns to hatred of America and Americans. We are a "corrupting" influence. And we do take for granted freedoms and benefits others can only dream of.


    We aren't forcing it at gunpoint, we're forcing it through much subtler means of economic pressure.

    Also, many European countries who consider American culture a corrupting influence have freedoms and benefits that Americans can only dream of: Freedom to drink at any ago, freedom for gays, universally available quality healthcare and education... US is not the only country with a powerful constitution, it's merely the most powerful country around.

    -Lars

  427. Screw you hoser - I AM CANADIAN! by RobinH · · Score: 2

    This reminds me of: The Joe Canadian Rant:

    Hey, I'm not a lumberjack, or a fur trader....
    I don't live in an igloo or eat blubber, or own a dogsled....
    and I don't know Jimmy, Sally or Suzy from Canada,
    although I'm certain they're really really nice.

    I have a Prime Minister, not a president.
    I speak English and French, not American.
    And I pronounce it 'about', not 'a boot'.

    I can proudly sew my country's flag on my backpack.
    I believe in peace keeping, not policing,
    diversity, not assimilation,
    and that the beaver is a truly proud and noble animal.
    A toque is a hat, a chesterfield is a couch,
    and it is pronounced 'zed' not 'zee', 'zed' !!!!

    Canada is the second largest landmass!
    The first nation of hockey!
    and the best part of North America

    My name is Joe,
    and I am Canadian!!!

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Screw you hoser - I AM CANADIAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pronounce it 'about', not 'a boot'.

      Yeah, but with a flappin' head and beady eyes, what does pronunciation matter?

  428. Man inveighs against constitution, citing freedom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha, ha, that's funny.

  429. Re:Bully or Teacher? by Fjord · · Score: 1

    And he would be making money from what? The complete lack of advertising on the site? Maybe the likelihood that it isn't even his site and that he's just got a free membership like about 3700 other people.

    --
    -no broken link
  430. You think you were pissed before!!!! by SailorBob · · Score: 1
    photo seized WTC/Bin Laden lighter

    Lighters commemorating 9/11 attack seized en route to Gaza (Communicated by the ISA (Shabak) )

    Tuesday, September 10, 2002 In the context of the monitoring process carried out by security forces in order to uncover the smuggling of arms and ammunition to the Palestinian Authority, cigarette lighters depicting the attack on the World Trade Center next to an image of Osama Bin Laden, were found. The lighters were to be sold in Palestinian Authority areas.

    In June 2002, the security forces carried out an inspection of crates that had arrived in the port of Ashdod. The crates were destined for the Palestinian Authority. In the course of the inspection of the containers - that were supposed to have contained toys - weapons, including pistols, were seized.

    Also found were lighters depicting the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center of September 11, along with an image of Osama Bin Laden. The lighters were intended for a Palestinian dealer in Khan Yunis, in the Gaza Strip.

    The planned distribution of these lighters in the Palestinian Authority was designed to be yet another expression of support for the terrorist attacks carried out by al-Qaeda organization, such as occurred in the Palestinian Authority in the aftermath of the September 11th attacks. Last year's expression of support included the distribution of sweets in the streets of the Palestinian Authority after the attacks, as well as mass celebrations in which shots were fired in the air as a mark of joy. Adults and children were seen waving pictures of bin Laden in Palestinian streets. In addition, leaflets were distributed in the Palestinian Authority emphasizing the importance of Jihad and calling on Muslims to stand up and take pride in their victory over the United States.

    --

    Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

  431. What kind of life does a slave enjoy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of liberty does a dead-man enjoy?

    What kind of life does a slave enjoy?

  432. I'll bite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sitting here reading through most everyone's posts, I'll comment instead of moderate.

    Remembering a year before, even if a bit overdone, is very acceptable. Thousands of people died and no matter what the situation, it's unforgivable.

    But not just for America.

    Natural disasters that a few people posted about aside, the death toll as a result of direct US policy or US support in other nations rivals that the US has experienced as well. A person is a person, no matter what the nationality of the situation. What this should have served as was a wake-up call, but instead it's been tied together with all sorts of rightist political agenda and lives will have ultimately be lost in vain.

    One of the comments heard over and over again today (I live in NYC) was about how the US needs to capture and do something pretty bad to Osama bin Laden. What most fail to recognize is that this isn't about one person, one group, one people or one incident.

    By father is a landlord. His tenant has a water leak in the wall and asked my father when he was going to fix it.

    He rejoined: "Once I find the leak."

    This should be the number 1 priority.

    No matter what the military action is taken by the US, it will not prevent attacks like this in the future. Catch Osama bin Laden, it'll be bin Akbar, bin Hossein. It's time to admit fault. Despite claims of jingoistic slashdotters claiming "The US is the best super-power there is"... the US is the only real super-power nowadays and it abuses it. A track record from the Cold War goes on and on and recently: the unconditional support of Israel, the attempted coup of Hugo Chavez, the questionable casualities in Afghanistan, the blind-eye being turned to the Northern Alliance's brutality and what seems to be the pending mistake of attempting to invade Iraq.

    Should the people of America be held responsible for the mistakes of their country? Absoutely not, despite what someone posted about the people of a country being held accountable for the acts of their country (in that case, being used as a Pro-America argument). However, there will always be backlashes. Some will just be dormant hatred for the politics of this country. Some will be protest. Some will be boycotts. Some will be demonstrations. And some will be violence directed at innocent civilians.

    Terrorists are not bred; they're created. Regardless of what the chmerical claims of the populus of this country is, middle easterns are not raised, for the most part, hating Jews, hating America, yada yada yada.

    But it's an easy transition.

    Respect those who have died, but from both sides.

    Learn from history.

    Or you're doomed to repeat it.

  433. Re:Why did they do it? better clues I've seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This
    interview with Ralph Bodenstein, who worked with him on a universoty project in Hamburg, gives an interesting look at Atta's mindset. See also
    Hamburg's Cauldron of Terror.

  434. ...ONLY WAY TO STOP TERRORISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is only one thing that can end terrorism. Nano-bots. Enough said.
    ~eville
    ~shasasmoker@hotmail.com

  435. Re:Puleeze! by NumberSyx · · Score: 2

    He can't sign something that guts the Constitution, unless it is also upheld by the Supreme Court. It also seems like everyone is forgetting that it was first passed by overwhelming margins in both the Senate -- 98-1 -- and the House of Representatives -- 356-66. I don't like the Patriot Act any more than you do, but it's not entirely the work of GW Bush.

    Every point you made here is absolutly true and only goes to prove that the Government as whole is the largest threat to our freedom, not just "Terrorists" and "Liberials" as the idiot who I was responding to said.

    --

    "Our products just aren't engineered for security,"
    -Brian Valentine,VP in charge of MS Windows Development

  436. Re:Puleeze! by chialea · · Score: 1

    At the time, I believed I might well have lost a friend who worked in the WTC. It turned out that he had quit just before, and he wasn't in the building. My worries for him and my grief were mixed with a healthy sense of worry for what would happen to civil rights, and what the government might use this as an excuse to do. Planning and worrying about the future does not somehow lessen the past and present.

    Lea

  437. Re:Puleeze! by revery · · Score: 1

    Agreed.

    I'm not a big fan of Feingold, but it took balls the size of church bells to be the only senator who voted against the Patriot Act.

  438. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that you are missing one small but important point on this.
    Intent.
    There is a large gap between targeting a military complex and catching a few innocent people and directly targeting innocent people, who have no military value.

    So in your opinion it was ok for Al Quada to attack that US destroyer and Pentagon?

  439. Oops by Sam+Gibson · · Score: 1

    Until WW2 that is.

  440. WTC Remembered by hacker · · Score: 2
    I've put up a huge archive of images that I've collected the first month of the tragedy, starting on the morning of the event. I stopped collecting these when I reached about 13,500 images, I'll keep adding them to Gallery as I get time.

    There are hundreds of images in there that have never made it to the media, images that were passed to me on irc the day it happened, from people in NY with cameras, out of their apartments, from their dorms, everywhere. There's a few gruesome pictures of human parts falling from the buildings, as well as images of "jumpers".

    To those we have lost, we mourn you, and to those who remain, we feel your pain.

    We are wired, we are strong, and we are pissed!

  441. Never thought I would outlive the WTC by SailFly · · Score: 1

    Summer 2001 was my last time in NYC, and I was running late when I caught the PATH train back to NJ, departing from the WTC. I wanted to see the observation deck, but decided that I would see it next time in NYC. A notion flashed in my mind that I may die before I make it back to see the World Trade Center.

    Never in my wildest thoughts did I ever believe I would outlive the WTC.

    Maybe it's just this kind of upsetting reality that challenges me to remember who and what is truly important in my life, and just what I am willing to give to become united with my fellow humans who enjoy their freedom too.

  442. Thanks for your insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or, if I can spell "thanks" phonetically in Turkish, "Tayshaykuerederem". I'm a Canadian blond bearded and blue eyed (some of my relatives' eye colours served as models for the "evil eye") who felt much more at home in Istanbul than in London. I enjoyed your country's great courtesy and welcome when I've had the priviledge of visiting, and I now drink my tea in tall glasses! You may have met some of my countrymen in Kandahar, while four of our troops died in Afghanistan from friendly fire. Thanks for the great job you're doing there. I am sorry that Bulgaria tried to forceably change the surnames of its Turkish citizens to more "Bulgarian" ones, and I hope you will in no way find it uncomfortable to consider that it would be worthwhile to teach your country's students that (1) the massacre of Armenians was a bad thing, but that an even worse thing is failing to acknowledge ones own history and (2) the Kurds, like Canada's Quebeckers, have every right to speak their own language, and, should they democratically choose to do so, separate from the rest of Turkey. In Canada, we have prevented this separation despite two referenda by the expedient of making sure people want to stay in Canada, rather than by force of arms, but when a violent terrorist campaign resulted in kidnappings and death, did not hesitate to activate the War Measures Act. I like Turkey, and I think if you give the Kurds the choice of living in a democratic Turkey that respects their language and religion, you will ensure Kurds will want to continue to live there. If I may be allowed to make an overgeneralization, I think that Turkey is truly a great nation. Good luck and "Gulay gulay".

  443. Re:One Year On: What has America Learnt? by Ringlord · · Score: 1

    It would seem appropriate at this time to look back to see how America has changed, specifically in its relationship with other countries.

    Actually, in Europe you are now viewed as a bit of a bully. We do sympathize with you for the 911 attack, and we supported you in Afganisthan, but your tendency to just act as a bully in foreign relations has quite taken away the goodwill you got after 911.

    The issues that currently makes you unpopular is the boycotting of the Kyoto agreement, the refusal to acknowledge the international war crimes tribunal (but you still want to act the worlds cop..), the (probable) attacking of Iraq, and the massive backing of Israel.

    We are still allies, and we really want to still be friends, but your administration need to wake up and see that there are other nations in this world too.

  444. GatMo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What goes on at "GatMo" is a violation of human rights, including the United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights, to which the United States was one of the original signitories. Of course, it was drafted by a Canadian, so it must be commie-inspired.

  445. Re:Another way to count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as US people are refusing to think about how the actions of their country are inflicting extensive suffering in other parts of the world, as long your skyscrapers might continue coming down. Think about it.

  446. Sick and tired... by gatekeep · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Am I the only one who's completely tired of the 'news' coverage of this event? I mean, for over a year now I've had people telling me I need to 'remember' and 'pay tribute' to our 'fallen heroes.' Almost invariably, the best way to do so is by buying some memento which they're conventiently selling for the low price of $19.99.

    I think I'll spend the day commemorating with one of the over 150 books written about 9/11. Which one should I choose? Maybe 'Let's Roll' or 'Above Hallowed Ground.' Or there's the ones featuring children's art, or the impact of terrorist attacks on the gay community. At last check there are some 911 books on amazon.com dealing with the subject.

    When I tire of reading a book I can browse some of the thousands of pictures taken that day, or perhaps just kick back with the 'special edition' of any given newspaper filled with pages of 'stories' which are little more than people complaining and wondering what rationale there is for such an attack. Or I could watch the six-hour special today show, or check out Barbara Walters as she sits in on grief conseling sessions with the families. If that's not enough I can check out the Spike Lee special with films 'inspired' by the events of 9/11. As if the normally anti-establishment Spike Lee getting in on the action isn't enough, even ESPN is trying their hand at news and covering 9/11 with a documentary about flight 93.

    In short, I'm sick of the sensationalist propoganda surrounding what was certainly one of the nation's worst tragedies in history. I'm tired of people hawking 9/11 commemorative pins as if a pin will make a difference. I don't need an FDNY t-shirt, thank you. I refuse to take part in a 'moment of silence' or wear red white and blue to work. I refuse to purchase any publication with any sort of special edition or expanded coverage. I will not watch people crying on TV over their lost loved ones. I won't look at pictures of the orphaned babies who are somehow more worthy of our attention than the thousands of others orphaned in the year since 9/11. I will not let terrorism change my life as it has apparently changed everyone else's for the past year. I won't give in to the pressures of a society which is apparently hated by a good portion of the world.

    We allow our capitalism to destroy the message of what really happened and why, and then the next time we'll wonder why anyone could despise us so greatly. Ratings, Money, Stock prices, these are our Gods. The tragedy of what happened is only a means through which we come closer to them. What kind of people would take part in an attack on innocent civilians? Clearly evil ones. What kind of people will spend a year making money off that in an orgy of patriotism and memorial gone wrong? I'll leave that to you to decide.

    This really is a holy war, but maybe it's less about Allah and more about Dollahs.

    (end rant)

  447. Godwin's law invoked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHL. HAND.

  448. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by RebelTycoon · · Score: 1

    Do you know when the 3rd atomic bomb was dropped on a civilian population?

    There wasn't one... Because deterence was able to work after Stalin saw that his ass could be vaporized!

  449. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by RebelTycoon · · Score: 1

    Germany... Yes... It was unnecessary to be that cruel...

    Japan? That's harder, since they should have surrendered immediately! Also had Stalin not started to move, they could have waited another 24 hours...

  450. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by websaber · · Score: 1

    Ditto... The point is be reserved and heisitent in judgement not abandon it altogether

    --
    "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
  451. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just went back and re-read some of the /. posts from 9/11/01. oh man, makes me sick all over again.

    My sweet, gentle wife says we should kick Iraq's ass next before Saddam hands a nuke over to Osama. I say we should let him, wait until it goes off somewhere, then nuke the whole region back into the Stone Age for the favor. So I guess that makes her a relative peace activist. Interesting times we live in.

  452. It's not isolationism by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's the fact that american citizens don't give a damn about what are doing outside the USA their goverment or corporations. Sweatshops? Well, they are better than without work, isn't it? Puppet goverments and dictators in the middle east or Latin America? Well but they are our allies, aren't they? Oh! they are killing people! well, they must be killing comunist or terrorist freaks, rigth?

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    1. Re:It's not isolationism by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Exactly why should I, as an American citizen, care what is happening outside of my country? I live here, I work here, and I don't travel outside of my country (at least not yet). There are enough problems in my own country that need to be worked on. For all it's worth, some idiots attacked my country (and I was in downtown NYC that day), now they die.

      Now in reality, I do pay attention to world events, so don't go off accusing me of being myopic- I would just like a good, compelling reason for "giving a damn" about a whole bunch of countries that can't get their shit together and form a better government/country. You don't want sweatshops? Get rid of them. You don't want that dictator? Get rid of him. The US got rid of British rule at a time when it had a world wide empire, so feel free to stop whining and actually do something about the conditions you hate so much.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  453. Remembering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think its an insult to all the people who have died in war that america focuses on its loss as if those people( yes i know they came around the world ) are the only people to have every died in tragedy. Americans needs to wake up to themselves and learn more about the world instead of being so self centered thinking they are the center of the universe. 99% of them probably dont even know where afghanistan is on a map. THe sad thing is americans think they stand for freedom, yet they are often the source off support for the worse scum on the earth.

    Dont ask any chileans about Pinochet and how the cia helped him. The same goes for Argentina and its military rulers a while back. What about the overthrow of the democratic government of Iran before the Ayatollah, The support of a pathetic government in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and other oil barons. If you love freedom so much why do you support the later and their insults to their women, foreigners and so many other humanities.

    And anohter point,, why is it so bad for Saddam to have weapons of mass destruction? People say because he attacks his neighbours... HOw many countries has America invaded inthe past 20 years ? How many people have died in its bombings( anyone crying for the weddings in Afghanistan ). The strange thing is America itself has the base with largest stockpile of chemical stockpiles. This was in a mainstream paper. Why is it okay for America to have such weapns of mass destruction ? Why has George promised to destroy these weapons ?

    How many people died in Rwanda? Many more than on 9/11 so America shut up and stop crying, the line is long and your story is no way near the most impressive.

  454. A flash video to commemorate WTC Victims by bluenirve · · Score: 1

    Please watch this. It really touches you. http://www.microwinder.com/tribute/tribute.htm

  455. we should just 'put a boot in their ass' by GMOL · · Score: 1
    I'm still really pissed off about those palistineans dancing in the streets with joy while downtown Manhattan was busy getting covered in 2 inches of soot.

    That's funny, cause the Afghani's were just so happy to hear songs about 'putting a boot in their ass'. They were going to concerts and everything..oh wait...that was the Americans.. but it's ok, our celebration of agression is justified. Their's isn't, cause they're just a bunch of backward people who believe in a book of crazy made up stuff.

    It seems fair to allow someone to cheer for a side in war, despite the unspeakable reality of the actions.

  456. What If... by LegendOfLink · · Score: 1

    "It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth."

    These are the words Morpheus uses in "The Matrix" to describe the alternate reality of the Matrix to Neo.

    But think about it, how far from the truth are we?

    One year ago exactly, a terrible tragedy occurred which destroyed almost 3000 people. Airliners were hijacked and made into missles to destroy only the largest building in the US and supposedly the most safest place in world, the Pentagon. If this was a movie scenario, it would seem too grand and absurd to be real; however, it is real.

    Suddenly there is a war in Afghanistan. A war against terrorism, a obscure and blurry enemy, who never remains fully visible or even the same.

    Flash forward to the ousting of the Taliban. US and Northern Alliance forces seize back Afghanistan from "terror". Now there is a controversial oil pipeline running through that country and the rights of American citizens being taken away here in the States. Wire taps, invasion of privacy, and the new ability to imprison American citizens (ala Jose Padilla) without a trial or the premise of "innocent until proven guilty" takes precedence to "fight terror". The American President is looking to start a new war on a country that poses no evident threat to the US. It also turns out that this country has the second largest reserves of oil in the world.

    What has happened? Was 9-11 a terrible tragedy commited by heinous madmen using Islam for their justifications, or is it a convenient vehicle somehow construed to enable future wars to occur? Did somebody let 9-11 go by with the understanding that Americans would lose more rights after this tragedy and be easier to monitor and control? Does "fighting terrorism" offer enough support and justification for bombing other countries for no valid reason?

    Is there another world out there that only the rich elite in higher power know about and manipulate every day?

    I don't know, but if there is, 3,000 lives are not worth it.

    You can flame me and call me a nut if you want, but all I ask is that you think about it.

  457. Re:I'm sorry by datarat · · Score: 1

    I really don't understand this. People all over the world mourn these things. Nobody in Israel or Ireland or Pakistan says "Hmm? Another Car bombing? Oh well." Not even in the US.

    It's a fact that the closer to home such an event is, the more it hurts. When was the last time 3,000 people were killed in a single angry blow in this country?

    We Mourned after the Civil War, after World War I and II, so why can't we mourn now?

    This has nothing to do with how big the United States is. What I want to know is why so many people have to pretend that our suffering isn't worth acknowledging?

    Let me throw a quick question at you: Is it better to lose a relative suddenly and without warning to natural causes, or to have them linger for days or weeks? Which family suffers more?

    The answer: Both. Grief is personal and cannot be compared to another person's experience. I've lost family both ways, and neither was easy.

    So in closing, you can not make me feel guilty for feeling mournful about the loss of innocent people.

    Stop trying.

    --
    If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  458. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the third,fourth, fifth......one thousand bombs should be dropped on all those Arabs. We are still waiting for Justice for what they did. They have run their fucking countries to the ground with their religious. Its about time they find out what messing with America really means.

  459. More plaincrashes, more "terrorism"!! by Pomple · · Score: 1

    This is the greatest day of them all. Even beats christmast. No banners on websites and gnutellaprograms. It is so great. One day down 364 days to go ;-) Seriously. America has done so many bad things to world that I would`t know where to start. And it seems like that Americans have yet learned to behave. The guys in the EU is trying to solve, like one smarter Bill said it, "this food- and airdeal". Meanwhile Americans is trying to raipe Irak ones more of the horror of terror. I`m just going to say this so everyone knows: We all know you are after the oil in the Middeleast. Stop doing that. If the people of America thinks it right to fuck nations over and steeling their oil, then you will have the hole world against you....wait a second....you already have! HAHAHA. Fact: 70% of the european people already hate your guts. That`s an increase of 20% within a year. "Oh my God! There are terrorists everywhere!!" So I just sitting back here, smiling of your sorry asses, and thinking "what goes around, comes around. And there is alot of causes still going around and getting stronger" Come to Norway fuckers, and I will fist your asses.

    1. Re:More plaincrashes, more "terrorism"!! by The+Bungi · · Score: 2
      Norway? You mean the "country" that would be a wholly owned subsidiary of the Third Reich today if it wasn't for the Unites States?

      I thought so.

    2. Re:More plaincrashes, more "terrorism"!! by geekee · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it Saddam who was trying to steal oil from Kuwait? I don't remember any reports of the US taking any oil after liberating Kuwait. By the way, I'm sure Europe is on al queda's agenda, you're just as much of an infidel as the average US citizen.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    3. Re:More plaincrashes, more "terrorism"!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it any coincidence that none of those who express such opinions can spell or write grammatically? I think it goes beyond merely being untutored in the English language.

  460. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They got what they deserved. They should not have messed with us.

  461. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by chill · · Score: 1

    I wasn't implying others didn't have strong Constitutions, just that only the U.S. had the whole enchilada.

    Freedom to drink at any age doesn't strike me as earth-shattering. Not being able to consume alcohol in public until you reach 21 is hardly revolution-inspiring.

    Freedom for gays varies from country to country, and in the U.S. from State to State. Several U.S. States are quite accepting and others are moving along.

    Universally available quality healthcare and education. Universally available quality education IS available in the U.S. No, each school is not the same, nor do the receive the same funding. However, environment and parent participation are both larger factors than $$ in education quality. (Yes, I have 3 kids in U.S. schools.) We aren't #1 in the world in schools, but we aren't on bottom, either.

    As far as healthcare -- it isn't legal for a hospital in the U.S. to turn away an emergency patient for lack of funds or insurance. Our healthcare is THE best in the world. Where do people fly to when they need top notch care? The Mayo Clinic, Shriner's Burn Hospitals, Johns Hopkins. Does everyone get equal treatment and equal access to ALL services? Nope. Some treatments cost more than others and that is a fact of life.

    Healthcare may be "free" in Canada, France, Sweden and others but you pay thru nose in taxes for it. We choose not to. You also have longer waits for non-emergency services. I can schedule a non-emergency procedure and get in for almost anything in hours to days.

    And for the record, I lived for 5 years in Europe (Spain) in the mid 1980s. I've also been back for business several times since -- three times this year alone. I really like Europe, but you can keep Socialism -- it isn't worth the cost.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  462. Wait a sec... by Nailer · · Score: 2

    and finally (especially for us Brits) helped fund the IRA - who have been systimatically blowing up and killing people in both the UK and Ireland for well over 20 years.

    I don't think many people agree with the IRAs methods. But its worth pointing out the IRA wouldn't have existed had Britain not invaded the country, starved its inhabitants to death, burned down people's homes, stopped people from speaking their native language, violently discriminated against those who didn't adopt a foreign religion, and started transplanting people from other countries into areas cleared of natives in an attempt to Anglicise the country.

    Killing innocents is wrong. Both sides of that war are guilty, and could be classified as terrorists.

    1. Re:Wait a sec... by xmedar · · Score: 2

      Unlike the majority inhabitants of the United States of America, who slaughtered the native population... and if you recall history Ireland was partitioned in a settlement that both parties to the conflict agreed to, whereas Americans put the native population on "Reservations" AKA Ghettos after violently oppressing them. Please check history and adjust your views accordingly.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
  463. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're not the ones strapping bombs and killing women and childen. Its the Arabs who are doing this. Get your facts straight. The best thing to do to this region of the world is to drop a couple of nukes and watch them fuckers fry.

  464. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    Really? Not to sound like a troll, and not having read the last two books yet, I don't recall a SINGLE point where Gandalf actually killed anyone.

    Fought yes. Killed? Perhaps it was the goblins in the caves of Moria? Do you count the trolls in "The Hobbit"?

    I mean, I always considered Gandalf to be the epitome of Neutral Good... Went out of his way to do the right thing, but never tipped the scales in favor of good or evil either way...

    I'm just curious. :-)

    -Chris

  465. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2

    So in your opinion it was ok for Al Quada to attack that US destroyer and Pentagon?

    From a military stand-point, yes.
    Both of those are valid military targets. While I don't like the idea of our soldiers being killed, in a war-time situation those are acceptable targets. Mind you, the use of a civilian plane, with civilians on-board is questionable as a vaild way to perform an attack. Though I will grant that under the logic of what is a blatant attack on civilians and what is collateral damage, the civilans on the plane could be viewed as collateral damage. Though in counter-argument to that conclusion there would be the question of, could the goal have feseably been acheived without the substantial loss of civilian life? If the goal was simply to create terror, then that answer is no, and thus the use of the airliner was a blatant attack on civilians. Again, it comes down to intent. What was the goal of the attack, and why were the methods choosen?
    Let us go out on a limb for a second and assume that the goal of the attack on the Pentagon was intended to disrupt the US Military Command and Control, and prevent a quick response. Further we have to accept the, probably false, assumption that the loss of the Pentagon would cripple US Military C&C. So, what were the options? An air strike was out, the likelyhood of a bomber penetrating US airspace and getting inside the DC area is low, it would have been perceived as a threat and shot down by the time it got over the land. A land based bomb might have stood a better chance, but it would have been too small to do any real damage. Flying an airliner into the Pentagon is a pretty attractive choice at this point, if its fuel tanks are full it might cause a lot of damage, not to mention that its unlikely to be perceived as a threat until far too late. Only downside to this is the high civilian casualties, if you don't care about this problem, this is where you might stop thinking. But there was another option that they missed. Ok, they have accepted that the pilot is going to be lost, and they want to cause a good sized explosion. Buy a small jet, pack it with explosives and fly that into the target. It would have had the same benifit of suprise, and might have provided for a bigger bang, plus fewer civilians killed.
    So in the end, yes, I think that the two attacks you put forward were valid military targets, though the method of attack choosen on the Pentagon was invalid. Though keep in mind, one shouldn't be suprised when the US military turns around and opens a can of whoop-ass on them.

    --
    Necessity is the mother of invention.
    Laziness is the father.
  466. What about Colin Powell? by curious.corn · · Score: 1

    Hey there, I'm italian. Over here we're overwhelmed with rethoric speeches and enthusiastic interviews on Bush's next round; and all US news we get is either filtered by Berlusconi's media or is FOX :-(
    I'm curious to know Powell's position on this policy. Being an ex soldier he keeps an astonishingly low profile and this makes me think he doesn't fully agree with the warmongering of his boss. Does he think the executive isn't taking the right decisions but rather breeding more resentment against the american people (actually the whole western world)?

    Here's my 2c (very IMHO):
    The US helped us out of misery in the aftermath of WWII. Your leaders had fresh memory of the fall of the Weimar Republic to the nazi and of the conditions that determined it (national humiliation and economic disaster for imperial Germany as it lost WWI). This produced more that 50 years of peace, prosperity and peace (... some might argue, but...) Two weeks ago Bush zeroed the UN's Forum for developing countries and environment preservation (water, food, developement, fair trade); today he's preparinng your country for another expedition (and plastic bag count).
    Short to exterminating a couple of countries worth of extremists there's nothing a military solution can do. The US generals that helped us out of the fascist folly knew perfectly well how to turn Europe in a collaborative ally.
    It's not comforting to see a soldier that played the game first hand thoroughly avoid trumpeting the pentagon propaganda but stand by the civilians. It's like insisting on a stupid haircut against the barber's suggestion...

    --
    Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
  467. September 11th to me by Umanity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am sorry if I can't be so beligerent as some people seem to be. Although I have political differences with the powers that be I must remember today as the day the terrorists killed my only brother. Jonathan J. Uman was only 34, recently married and just had his second child. He worked for eSpeed on the 105th floor of the 1st tower of the WTC. I live in the San Francisco bay area, and woke up to the news. My father called me to tell me my brother was confirmed to be in the building at the time of the impact. This news was devastating to both my mother and my father, and his wife and children.

    All contempt aside, this day is a day which our country, the United States has never seen the likes of before. This is an historic event, and when they read my brothers name at the cerimonies today I was reminded that me and my family will forever be reminded of his death, and his life. I look at those people who take this event and mock it, those who are 'tired' of the commercialization of the event. I am tired of that too, but there is more to this, a human quality which extends beyond that capitalistic desire. I am tired of all the flag waving, but 2,800 some odd people perished in a couple of moments.... That is quite tragic, and nothing they did would make them deserve the death they received. It was a horrible, horrible death... Burning and falling, screaming and being crushed. I have pictured the event over and over, and have to watch it over and over while watching the news.

    I believe in a future where mankind lives in peace and prosperity. In my speech for my brothers memorial I mentioned my desire to live like Roddenberry depicted in Star Trek, a world without hunger and a world where people strive to make things better. This is an optimistic goal, and one which I have begun to question as I believe that human nature is possibly more ugly than I wanted to admit.

    I don't want my brothers death to cause more unwarranted death in the world. I want to make things better by looking at the problems we have, analyzing them, and making educated decisions. I don't believe the administration is doing that at this time. But that is another story...

    Thank you,

    --

    Michael A. Uman
    Sr Software Engineer
    softwaremagic.net

    1. Re:September 11th to me by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      anyone who moderates, should be real,real ashamed not for modding parent up and modding up those clueless/ignorant/uneducated posts above.

      RIP the innocent...

      Ilgaz/ Istanbul / .tr

    2. Re:September 11th to me by 0bjectiv3 · · Score: 1

      I hope you read this. Your family has experienced perhaps the most brutal loss in American history.

      No matter what the motives, no matter how "terrible" our "foreign policy" is, nobody deserves to die, not even bin Laden.

      Judging by the tone of your message, you seem to have risen above vengeance to recognize the tragedy for what it is - a tragedy. You're much farther along than my bloodthirsty compatriots.

      --

      "Saddam Hussein cavorts with terrorists."
  468. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by roamer · · Score: 1

    Not to burst your bubble or anything, but I think you are speaking in ignorance about Gandalf, and about Tolkein in general. The obligatory counter example is that Gandalf beheads the Goblin King in The Hobbit, but there are others. I have read Tolkein fairly extensively, though, and there is no "Neutral Good" in Tolkein's works. There is Good - the things of Illuvatar (God) and the Aindule - which is kinda like the fate- it is harmony and the song of existence, if you will. Then there is evil- it is chaotic, and a shadow and twisting of Good. There is no neutral anywhere.

    --
    I don't respect your opinions, but I respect your right to hold them
  469. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, many guns in Afghanistan came from the US during the cold war. I saw a documentary telling that when a kid was killed, the tv reporters insisted on the fact that he was killed with US guns. I think repetition of this kind of information is likely to provoque hate. By the way, it also mentioned that Ousama Ben Laden was hired by US at a time to fight in Afghanistan.

  470. practicality by geekee · · Score: 1

    I've seen a lot of posts about people worried about the civil rights of suspected terrorists. Just wondering how practical it would be to fight a guerrilla war in a public courtroom? How effective is it to eliminate enemy combatant when you need to publically display all the evidence needed to convict the suspected terrorist. It would certainly give away your position to let your enemy know exactly what you know about him. It may even compromise agents and informants. I'm not saying I'm right. I'm just wondering if people have really considered the consequences of what they would like the government to do in the war on terrorism. It seems people are saying the government can't be trusted at all and if given extra powers to fight this war, they will be abused. Is this really a practical position to hold? I don't have the answers, but I think people here may see things a little too black and white.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  471. the barbaric americans by gryf · · Score: 1

    There comes a point where talk is counterproductive. Sanctions only do so much. Containing Yugoslavia was the preferred method for Western Europe to manage the Balkans. The result was a free hand for Milosovic to purge and pillage throughout the region. He refused to comply with the simplist UN requests, and when the UN decided to let its troops become hostages, the US prodded NATO to get involved before the surrounding nations did become drawn into a larger war.
    Talking to Saddam Hussein did nothing for the Kuwaitis who were being extinguished, whose lives were being erased as Iraqi forced destroyed any records that might have contradicted the story they gave the world.
    In the end, it was our talking and economic sanctions, not our military intervention, that brought the Japanese to bomb Pearl Harbor.
    Discussion and compromise did nothing for the Jews in Germany, Poland, or Chechoslovakia. Debate did not shield the Chinese of Shanghai or the vitims of the Soviet gulags.
    I suggest that a closer review of history will bear out the suggestion that military might is the only sure way to stop the mass death of innocents when ambitous tyrants such as Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden challenge domestic tranquility at home and abroad. Easing the US stance towards Iraq and al-Qaida will only provide them more opprotunites to cause harm.

    --

    #-#
    Ad Astra Per Aspera
    A rough road leads to the stars
  472. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real reason why Americans are hated is chiefly related to American foreign policy. Obviously 19-20 people did not fly across the world and commit suicide because they're bothered by America culture, that's ridiculous. The leaders of the attacks knew what they were going to bring down on the middle east. You have to assume that the leaders had a reason, a strong motivation.

    1 reason is America's support of Israel. 60 years ago there was no such thing as Isreal at all. 200 years ago, 300 years ago, 1000 years ago, 2000 years ago, there was no Jewish state. The last Jewish empire was conquered by the Romans sometime during the BC period, I believe the last uprising was around 300 BC. All of a sudden, the holocaust (a great tragedy by the way) occurs and for political and perhaps moral reasons the UN helped the Jewish people start the country of Israel. What do you think the natives think? These people are kicked out of their homes and when they fight back America provides weapons to Israel. There is great resentment over this.

    There is great resentment over the Iraqi war of 1991? While this would seem a perfectly justifiable encounter, please remember that America supported Iraq and provided much of their weapons during periods of the Iran-Iraq war.

    At the same time, America was supported Afganistan. They provided weapons and training and urged (there was a proposed peace treaty) the Afghanis to fight on. After the Soviets withdrew what happened? America never emerged to heal Afghanistan, there was no longer any military need.

    Another issue, is the prescense of American troops in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia, I will remind you, contains some of the most holy sites of Islam. It is considered a great dishonour for America to be there.

    These are all very basic and documented points. Not that I mean to criticize the States, I believe somebody has to take an interest in world affairs. However, I think in certain case more prudence and consideration of long-term consequences could have been implemented.

  473. Lessons I Learned After September 11th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That freedom ties with truth for the first casualty of war.
    That the very definitions of "war", "peace" and the difference between them may be among the first truths to die.
    That you can sell anything - economically or politically - by appealing to patriotism and/or grief.
    That patriotism, as Bierce knew, is indeed the first refuge of the scoundrel.

    Sometimes the lesson of great loss and pain is that trite cliches became banal and worn out for a reason.

    And sometimes, it can be hard to distinguish the pain of the learning from the pain of the lesson learned.

    - An Anonymous Legal Alien

  474. We've learned a few things. by Apuleius · · Score: 2

    That our capacity to suffer fools isn't limitless, for example.

  475. What I remember about 9-11-01 by tombeard · · Score: 1


    I was home that day. Out of work (since resolved, thanks), and had the day to watch tv. I remember the estimates, 50K, 20K, 10K, 5K. A tremendous number of lives were saved that day. I wonder just how many did escape murder.

    What I remember most was coverage from the middle east. There was dancing and celebration in the streets. Egypt, Saudi, Palestine, Jordan. Syria. People dancing and burning US flags. I only saw it that day. Since, it has never been mentioned again. No replays, no follow-ups. Obvious censorship, after all, some of those countries were our friends, they never did that.

    I remember.

    Tom Beard
    ThomasRBeard@softhome.net

    --
    The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
  476. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by squiggleslash · · Score: 2
    I consider capital punishment in this case to be euthanasia. They can't be allowed to continue the way they are unchecked and any other alternative is essentially torture.
    Would you agree to make the death penalty voluntary in that case?
    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  477. Just remember where you get your lunch money from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ummm.... you tast nice, like a nice fat capatilist pig.

    What the fuck would i do with money you fool. I don't want you fucked up capatilist food, or fucked up capitalist schools.

    some kid in russia brainwashed with your fucked up ideas, poor fucker, I'd rather live a life not knowing what the fucks going around your head, but unfortunatly you wouldn't let me.

  478. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Psx29 · · Score: 1
    These people are too far gone to even try to set straight. We'd be doing everybody a favor (including them) by killing them.

    Even when killing them it is not something to take joy in, you should still be saddened that these people were mis-guided in life that they could not live. They still deserve to die though....

  479. war criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so is half of America, but whos counting....

  480. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by banzai51 · · Score: 1

    Ahhh, but you have to CHOOSE our culture. You choose to buy those jeans, that Starbucks, that Big Mac. We may be setting up shop, but you don't have to buy. Euro-Disney didn't exactly set Europe on fire, did it? You are also forgetting that many of the "freedoms" you list are abundant in America and most often of a much higher quality.

  481. Re:I agree completely.... No, you are wrong by spoco2 · · Score: 1
    "Any suggestion that unknown or plainly obvious foreign policy decisions led to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and that these attacks were somehow justified because of such corrupt foreign policy, is completely assanine."

    He's not saying it's justified, he's just putting it in context in the same way that the US bombings on Japan were in context.

    In the US's eyes it was completely justifiable to destroy two entire cities in Japan due to their attacks on the US. In OBL's eyes it was completely justifiable to destroy the WTC due to the US's policies and actions in many countries around the world.

    There aren't many people who would agree with the actions of OBL, or say that he was justified on committing these acts, but by the same token, you are condemning a far too wide group of people to death because of the actions of a few. In just the same way, it could have been argued that all Americans should have been killed because of their bombing of Japan.

    He was drawing parallels, and quite well. There absolutely is no "good" and "bad", there are only varying degrees of grey... and it all depends on just how close to black you're willing to get as to what side you decide to play on.

    Myself? I abhor what was done on that day, I was in San Francisco at the time (I'm from Australia), and was absolutely stunned, shocked and horrified by what happened, it was truly horrific. However, while there is no way to defend what they did, I can see some of the reasons why they did, and I don't agree with everything that the US has done in terms of supplying arms to countries, siding with countries based on their own, internal and political agendas etc. I also feel exactly the same way about Australia and its foreign and internal policies.

    The point is... far too many people take the easy option of painting OBL et al as pure evil and America and her allies as pure, shining good... it just ain't like that folks... I would go to war to defend Australia, and most likely the US if need be... because I agree, in an overall view, with their vision for what a country should be... it's just always screwed up by individual politicians and industry...

  482. Were there really successful Heroes on Flight 93? by meehawl · · Score: 2

    On flight 93, the passengers fought back.

    There are several glaring omissions from the official record of the final minutes of FLight 93. The anomalous debris pattern and the apparent loss of all onboard recording equipment means that an accurate record can not be made. Instead, what we have is mythmaking.

    Several ground-based observers have described a large explosion on-board. Several passengers phoned to say one of the hijackers was wearing what looked like an explosive vest.

    Also, it's important to note that only the flight cockpit hijackers knew they were on a suicide mission -- and their identities are still suspect. At least three of them appear to have used identity theft to hide their real identities. They were mercenaries, professional Islamist soldiers. Most of the rest of the hijackers were dupes, simple goon muscle lied to by their masters and convinced they were on a standard hijacking mission.

    It's at least as likely that they were the ones who struggled onboard Flight 93 to regain control. After all, they were armed.

    --

    Da Blog
  483. Re:OK, so why did it happen by Fjord · · Score: 1

    Read the link in my sig.

    Some stuff for the lameness filter.

    Some more stuff.

    --
    -no broken link
  484. Theories, Pathetic Whimpers, and Traitors by ellem · · Score: 2



    Theories
    The whole Bible, Nostrodamus and Emergency Phone trip is hysterical.
    Let's try to look at this rationally.

    A group of people take flying lessons that include steering, no take-offs, no landings. As such, they have no ability to fly by intruments alone so they have to fly on a clear day; literally so they can look out the window. 09.11 a VERY clear day, 09.10 a little over cast.

    Mystery Solved

    Pathetic Whimpers

    This is just sad geekdom:

    "I want to live the way Rodenberry wrote about Star Trek... where people try to make things better."

    Carl Sagan said...

    One time during a Dungeons and Dragons campaign...

    We must strive for peace or we are doomed to Ender's Game.

    Kirk was right when he said....

    A passage in the Hobbit...

    In The Matrix...

    Holy shit folks those are make believe. In fact, without the "scary" over commercialized, over hyped, mass marketed United States _most_ of those things wouldn't exist. There is no utopia. Every place has evil/bad in it. Some more than others. If you think there is a better place to live on this planet or any other you are free to leave the US.
    Now I don't mean that antagonistically, I mean it literally. You can leave the US anytime you like (unless you are in jail or serving the military, etc.) This is a GREAT thing about the US. You can come and go as you wish. If you think Canada or France will do you better go. I mean why not? If you think that life on Quark 5621 is going to afford you a "harmonious" life, hop on the next flight to fantasyland and go.
    Sure we'll miss your 33% but we'll get by. Oddly despite the fact that the US is a horrible, war mongering place humans continue to flock on our shores, leagally and otherwise. As of yet, no mass exodus...

    Humans kill eachother all the time. Sometimes they do it for fun. You think we're better than animals because we can move our thumb? Because we made up some religions? Because we communicate in a way _we_ understand? Get real.

    Humans have been offing one another forever. Zug thinks you poached on his land you and your whole fucking tribe are dead. Christians think you're defiling their Holy Land, they raise a fucking army to kill you off. World Economy going to shit, people using Deutsch Marks to write on instead of paper, got a glut of 20-somethings? Germany waltzes through Belgium and takes over France. "Hey what the fuck," America says and jumps in while everything is all hot and bothered. Think there's a coincidence that 21 years passed between WWI and WWII? The world just need to grow more army men to finish off the war.

    Humans love to hate. Deal with it.

    Traitors

    You live in the United States. Your are actually bound to defend this country. Literally, legally. It is part of the deal when you live here.

    People that complain that we had this coming, we deserve this, this is a good thing are pretty much, fucking traitors. I know you hate Republicans and all that, but if you honestly believe that Pedro Ruiz who was working at Windows On The World for 4.25USD an hour deserved to die becuase the US backs some country, you're a traitor. You should be tried and convicted as such. You are evil, callous and certainly anti-American.

    Now I realize a lot of you are youngish and in College or lower and believe the stuff your teachers are telling you. 93% of Accredited College/University Professors who chose to answer the recent USA Today poll said they were registered Democrats and 78% of them described themselves as Liberals. I don't have a personal Limbaugh/Hannity/Gingrich type agenda against any of these folks I just know that once I got out of College and started getting heavily taxed I began to think that maybe the Republicans were right and the Democrats wanted to tax me too much because they liked big government. Of course even later I know they are all scumbags.

    But I digress...

    You, who would claim you are a Black person before you are American, and as such find the flying of The American Flag offensive (Newsday 09.11.02) I find you offensive. I find you traitorous. I think you should leave and go someplace where they _really_ treat blacks inhumanely.

    You who pledge allegiance to your Italian Flag over your American Flag, despite the fact that you have never been to Italy, you too are a Traitor!

    It is a privilege, an honor, A GIFT to live in the United States of America. You who wish evil upon the US as you live here. You who wish for the come-uppance of the US, you who hate your own country are Traitors.

    Do not quote Civil Disobedience, do not believe that Thoreau was calling for the destruction of the United States, even as HE was opposed The Mexican War. Do not recount the evils of the US WITHOUT recounting the overwhelming GOOD the US has done.

    ---

    Those of you outside the US who hate us, do what thou wilt but be warned that action against the US often leads to the destruction of the those that would harm us. Yeah we'll eventually rebuild you and then you'll give us back massages and make our fucking TVs.

    Thanks... Rant over.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:Theories, Pathetic Whimpers, and Traitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was under the impression that there was a first ammendment to the US constitution that allowed people to say what they felt and so by implication to believe things other than those proscribed by the government (or others).

      Maye Sen Ruiz did deserve to die, since he worked as part of one of the most repressive regimes on Earth (which other government feels it has the right to change the democratically elected governments of other countries?)

      Yes, the US has contributed alot to global culture, good and bad - don't make the mistake of supporting the bad, just because it is your crap.

    2. Re:Theories, Pathetic Whimpers, and Traitors by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      Where do I start?

      "Carl Sagan said ..." - I'm pretty sure Carl Sagan wasn't make believe.

      "This is a GREAT thing about the US. You can come and go as you wish." - Only if you are a US citizen. I CANNOT come and go as I wish, so perhaps "You" in your context means "US citizens". It was unclear whether you actually meant "anyone who's anyone is a US citizen".

      "You think we're better than animals because ..." - well that's the idea, and I've heard that as a species it's our goal to be the best we can and rise above the animals and their killing instincts. If I can refer to something close to most if not all American hearts, the statement "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Note the order in which Life, Liberty, etc. are listed.

      "Think there's a coincidence that 21 years passed between WWI and WWII?" - by your arguments there should have been WWIII by 1966, WWIV by about 1990 ... Why didn't it happen? Becuase deep down, people don't want war - they prefer to live without fear, without loss.

      "Humans love to hate. Deal with it." Many of us (i.e. Humans) deal with it by prefering not to add to the circle of hate, and recognise that irrational, emotional approaches to global concerns will not bring a swift end to those concerns.

      "You live in the United States" - do I? Sweeping statements like that are all too common, and seen by some as a symptom of self-indulgence.

      "You, who would claim you are a Black person before you are American" - forgive my ignorance, but isn't nationality something you can change, and your race pretty much who you ARE and not who you WANT TO BE? If you wanted to be French or Canadian rather than American, then as you state, you are at liberty to become so (subject to certain laws and procedures). Being black is something that you are for life.

      "Those of you outside the US who hate us, do what thou wilt but be warned that action against the US often leads to the destruction of the those that would harm us. Yeah we'll eventually rebuild you and then you'll give us back massages and make our fucking TVs." - Now this is the bit that really confuses me, and I'm wondering if the whole of your posting wasn't cut and pasted from either a number of sources, or written by you over a period of time. Either way, this ending is clearly a step away from the general context of the main posting, but how many nations have threatened the US? Is it those that you are addressing?

      As for rebuilding, here's some flamebait:
      I suppose rebuilding is something you leave to others, e.g. Afghanistan (the first time round), Nicaragua, El Salvador, Angola ...

      Gr

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  485. Hahahaha!!! by uxo · · Score: 0

    Is there anything more ironic than a bloody Englishman lecturing someone else about imperialism? The people who brought you Kuwait, Kashmir, Israel and the IRA for that matter? The country that caused the American Revolution? Crikey!

  486. Best media coverage??? by uxo · · Score: 0

    Speaking as a conservative who gets his news from sources like Clearchannel, if you want UNBIASED media coverage *of* the U.S. you would do better to listen to BBC World Service.

  487. WTC Towers Collapse Questions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's some evidence that there may be inconsistencies in the collapse of the two world trade center towers.
    This web site points out a cloud of smoke coming from a tower not hit by the plane in the CNN video. This is hinting of a deliberate demolition of the World Trade Center site.
    This web site has information that the hijackers are actually alive.
    More technical information here. And isn't it strange that weapons-grade Anthrax is mailed?

  488. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Cpl+Laque · · Score: 1

    Any time someone brings up Isreal/American foreign policy issues. I think this: If the U.S. nuked Isreal tommorrow would they middle eat then love us? No. I don't think they would. So what do we do from here?

  489. rhetoric can also be true. by oh · · Score: 1

    Quoting Brian_Ellenberger
    I'm ashamed at this site sometimes, especially looking back at many of the high scoring posts from 9/11 that basically said we got what we deserved

    Did the people of Afghanistan get what they deserved? Did the HALF A MILION childred who have dies in Iraq get what they deserve?

    I'm not saying that those people who died got what they deserved. I'm sorry for the dead, and more so for the families that have to cope without a loved one. Personaly I don't handle death well. Its all I can do not to cry when I hear interviews with the relatives of the victims, quite often I have to turn the TV off or leave the room.

    I'm not sorry for a country that has only just realised that there is a world out there. Look at history. Time and time again the US has inflicted misery on people, has caused death and destruction that makes 9/11 look like a family outing.

    There is a saying "war is gods way of teaching Americans geography". Be sorry for those that deserve pity, all people, not just those like you. We are all human. Be sorry for those people that died in the tower, and those people who's wedding was bombed by the US in Afghanistan. Be sorry for those dying of AIDS in africa.

    Please think about what you do. I personaly think patriotism is mis-guided, if not evil. A country is not something to kill, maime, enslave, poison or imprison another human over. Thinks like human rights are. Just because you country does something DOES NOT make it the right thing to do. It is the right thing to do if it is the right thing to do.

    Please, Please, Please, for the sake of humanity, decide for youself if an action is justified. Don't accept other peoples opinions as facts. Learn the truth and decide for youself.

    --
    Democracy isn't about no one telling you what to do. It's about everyone telling you what to do.
  490. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure I would look to the nytimes as a credible post 9/11 news source.

  491. Re:The Events You Equate Were Fudamentally Differe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me prove you 100% right:

    If I am ever unlucky enough to meet you I promise on my soul I will kick your fucking ass.

  492. I read that email account. by Lethyos · · Score: 1

    If you want to talk to me, there's contact information right there.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:I read that email account. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of self-proclaimed 'linux geek' uses hotmail?

  493. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

    I'd give it more credence if it was something more then a parrot of a report that was in itself a parrot of "news" reports.

    --
    between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  494. September 11th by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1

    In our hearts forever. My 4c.

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  495. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You asked for evidence, was given it, then you refused to believe it. Why even ask if you will not change? At least be honest with yourself.

  496. Legalization of tortur in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the 9/11 disaster many people have voiced concerns about the diminished regard for civil rights as a consequence of the heightened demand for security. I believe many of those concerns to be unwarranted and unrealistic, and I do not subscribe to the theory that (selective, contained) violations of privacy must inevitably lead onto a slippery slope towards totalitarianism.

    HOWEVER of late, a number of influential jurists, such as Alan Dershowitz (defense attorney for e.g. OJ Simpson and Mike Tyson) and Richard Posner (senior judge for the court of appeals), have been arguing in favor of the use of torture as a valid (if not legal) means of interrogation. Alan Dershowitz in particular likes to fantasize about inserting needles under the fingernails of subjects, in his latest book.

    The US government has detained hundreds of people without any form of due process. This is one thing, and quite imaginably a necessary thing given the circumstances, even if it tramples numerous civil rights. HOWEVER to then proceed and contemplate inflicting pain on these people in order to obtain a forced confession is quite another.

    Legalized torture? Just Say No.

  497. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We're talking about people who think it's OK to kill thousands of civillians and actively seek to do so"

    If this is indeed your view than you have just sentenced the US govt to "capitol punishment". If you research history a little you'll find that the US consistently carries out mass murders in the name of "national security". I recommend searching "operation northwood" in google, for this is one of the worst acts our Gov't has considered for it was based on attacking our own popualtion and blaming it a Cube as a propaganda campaign.

    Happy researching...

  498. Who's a lucky girl then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I can say is that it's a good thing Bush has changed his tactics from a `War on Drugs' to a `War on Terrorism', otherwise he'd have to detain his daughter at Camp X-ray.

  499. 3 places short of hof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will overtake the This is IT story.
    w00t

    l4st p0st!

    1. Re:3 places short of hof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 2 places now
      Let's go!

  500. When God kills by superyooser · · Score: 1
    Who is this that darkeneth My counsel by words without knowledge?


    God sets before every man two options: good and evil. Man is free to choose at his whim.

    On September 11, the terrorists chose evil and acted hatefully against other people. However, God preserved the lives of most of the near-victims. (Remember, 50,000 people daily worked in the WTC alone.)

    When people are close to death, their values become aligned with God's. That is the whole point of this, I believe. When victims in the towers knew they were going to die, they didn't care about downloading the next Mozilla build. Major political controversies were not given a thought. The project that was due at 11:00 AM didn't matter anymore.

    Their minds were transformed. All of a sudden, they valued the precious moments of life as never before. They recognized the truth that people are dependent on God for every breath. Their faith, perhaps long withered away, was revived and strengthened to trust in the Creator as Savior and Lord. They desperately wanted their family to know "I LOVE YOU."

    These are the things that matter to God. And if the truth be known, to people too. Not technology, not politics, not entertainment, not science. It's all about getting back to the basics.

    1. Love God with all of your heart, soul, mind.
    2. Love other people as you love yourself.
    These are "the greatest commandments" according to Jesus. These are also the lessons of September 11, 2001. When you live as God teaches us to live, you regard life as sacred and you care for your family above all other obligations.

    God did allow many people to die, but that is His right. He was not obligated to give anyone life in the first place.

    When you were born, did you sign a contract with God that He would give you 80 years of life?
    How is it that you think God owes you something?
    Are your good deeds so meritorious that God is beholden to your righteousness?
    How do you reason that a sinner does not deserve death?


    Who are you to judge God?


    Here's where that first line comes from.

    1. Re:When God kills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, ha. Funny read. Must sucks to be you, as God doesn't exists...

  501. I volunteer my privacy by geekee · · Score: 1

    Even if every other person on slashdot refuses to give up anything to fight the war on terrorism, I will give up all privacy to the government. They can tap my phone, read my e-mail, even search my apartment. I don't care. I don't want to be remembered as someone who impeded the FBI in doing their job. I don't want to be a stumbling block in the discovery of future terrorist attacks against the US. I want to be a part of the solution, not the problem. I feel this sacrifice is minor compared to those made by others on and after 9/11/01, including firefighters, police officers, soldiers, and other brave citizens who have worked so hard to protect us from those who would destroy us all, given the opportunity.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  502. Sept. 11 = War? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's too bad that September 11 seems to be almost directly linked to war these days.

    I think this day should be set aside to reflect on the poor people who were killed and whose families now suffer the loss of their loved ones. We have 364 other days in the year to plot our revenge or whatever you want to call it.

    Listen to Bush... he can't talk more than 10 seconds about September 11 before he starts talking about the war and how we're going to kick their asses in. Now there's a role model for everyone!

    And now we have to _prevent_ terrorism, not simply react to it. That sounds rational. So why is it that law enforcement has always REacted to problems and not been proactive in preventing them? eg. you call the police to report a domestic disturbance. Unless someone has been beaten or killed, they'll ask you to call back later. Hmm.

    What makes the Taliban and maybe other countries hate the US so much? We should be asking ourselves that. Peace requires compromise. We may be able to sway people's opinions, but starting a war is not helping our int'l image.

  503. Hmm... by Peterus7 · · Score: 1
    One year after this, I do agree, it takes up way too much tv time, but what I think is worse is that the tv time that is taken up is all corporate sponsored and stuff like that. It doesn't focus on the real issues: The people, the stories. I am sick of seeing people with american flags that say old navy on them, that's just disgusting. Another thing that really annoys me is that when the incident happened, a large portion of the world sent their regrets, and nowadays, everybody hates us. I just blame that on bad leadership on our part.

    Another thing: Maybe 9-11 was what america had coming to it, but it wasn't what all the poor people had coming to them. And maybe the taliban had what was coming to them, but not all the innocents that were killed by american bombs. What I don't get is why are the errors of leaders and fanatics paid in innocent blood. Great habit of humans, eh?

  504. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you place so much non-sense in one post?
    Sorry, I don't agree with your assumptions, your
    facts, and your "reasoning". What you have
    posted is the official party line of CNN and
    the White House. Sorry, I don't buy it. Your
    non-sense are not suitable for posting, please
    tell them to those under 12-years old, and
    to the impressionable

  505. Pop Quiz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What countries make up the International Criminal Court?

    Yes that's right! Some of the biggest state-sponsors of terrorism!

  506. One that... by Lethyos · · Score: 1

    ...uses throw-away accounts to avoid spam.

    --
    Why bother.
  507. Maybe not a great thing... by indigo78 · · Score: 1

    ...but I started reading Slashdot regualrly on that day, because all the news websites were "/.ed" and this was the only webiste I knew that was still working...

    --
    I'm fat, you're ugly. I can get slimmer, and you?
  508. A piece of art by luisdlc · · Score: 1

    To make the WTC towers disappear, with CIVIL planes. To override the security, to 'attack' the most fearsome country, without military means. To do something more ingenious than the Trojan horse. This is a piece of strategic art. Pure art. To do the impossible, maybe a sad but an astonishing achievement.

    Kuwait and Iraq had a conflict, there was petroleum, and so the USA came and laid waste to Iraq. Thousands civil suffered or even died. And the dessert storm troopers where heroes, and USA got its petroleum.

    The dictator of Panama, an insignificant central American country, declared war on the USA, so the 'stealths' came to a country without radars, and the lasers, and they left the deaths in common pits, just like Germany did to Jewess. And the blinded laser testers where heroes.

    SOMEONE made possible the 9/11 disaster, and the USA pointed it was some 'Osama' (former CIA agent, what do you know) and laid waste to Afghanistan. They 'liberated them of their religions' (just like china did to Tibet) and where saviours, and again, got its petroleum-duct.

    The USA money bought Chile a dictatorship (Condor Plan), and hundreds civilian died, all in prevention of 'communism agents' and the killers where saviours.

    In an almost won war, 2 Nippon cities where nuked to ashes, civil lives sent to hell in a blink, and the creators of the bomb, where heroes.

    I don't know who planned and made possible the 9/11 'attack' but I would easily believe it were the Chinese than the Afghanis, the truth is, that it is a piece of art.

    A civil attack, not worse than the ones USA has committed, but far difficult, so unimaginable that to this day, we found hard to believe it happened.

    I am not saying it was ok, or that it is good that civil died. I just say, that it was Art.

  509. Re:Sad news - Stephen King, dead at 54 by unitron · · Score: 2

    Yeah, shouldn't he be dead at 55 by now?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  510. Re:Puleeze! by geekee · · Score: 1

    "The first thought that popped into my head was not about the horror of the event or even those who dies but rather a disturbed feeling that this is the start of a long erosion of everyone's rights." 3000 people died and the first thought that pops into your head is, great, now they're going to tap my phone? What's wrong with you and you too moderator fro giving this guy a 4). BTW, I doubt any legislation passed has directly affected you at all.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  511. Re:I agree completely.... No, you are wrong by mirnav · · Score: 1
    You suggest that American foreign policy is so nefarious, so wicked that two gigantic stuctures and thousands of innocent civilians should die as some sort of repayment.

    Not at all. You are confusing causality with justification. I have said nothing about "deserving" anything.

    You have asked where I am from - I am from a country that lost more than 10,000 of its people to terrorism. You do not need to tell me of funerals, crushed buildings, dismembered youths. I have seen them all.

    So you have met terrorism for the first time. Well, congratulations. Some of us lived all our lives immersed in it. And guess who was financing the terrorists all along - US, UK, etc. But of course, they were "freedom fighters" then, not "terrorists".

    I invite you to think on the possibility that if these people hate the US, they just might have a reason. And terrorism just might be the only way they can fight back. It is no secret that the US funded and trained Bin Ladin and his cavemen. So now the dog you trained and lashed on others turned to bite your own hand? The lesson is that such interventions as promoting religious fanaticism in a country to ward off their communist occupiers will have profound effects that might be undesirable for your country in the long term. Your country created Al-Qaeda. Now live with it.

  512. boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares.

  513. So tempted to Slam the USA, but ... by bushboy · · Score: 1

    I've seen a lot of comments posted here and elsewhere about the USA "Reaping what they sow" and other comments along the same lines.

    I would've been tempted to agree with them, but for one thing :-

    The sheer horror of the WTC attacks !

    Yes, the rest of the world has been experiencing terrorist attacks for many many decades, but nothing on the scale of 9/11

    People are also saying things like "If it had been in this or this country, it would never have been such a big deal"

    So what is your point ? - Of course it wouldn't - this was an attack on the worlds most rich and powerful country. There's few other places where the impact would've had such enormous repercussions worldwide - also add into the mix the fact that the USA produces the majority of the worlds media (or at least, the most widespread media programs)

    I watched a documentary last night that really bought the scale of the disaster home - the two french film makers who were originally filming a documentary on a rookie fireman and in-advertantly ended up filming the 9/11 disaster, including footage of the inside of the Towers.

    Anyone who can watch that and still say "America bought it upon themselves" is sadly mistaken and very heartless - no country deserves that kind of horror, not even Iraq.
    Why ? - Because it's the innocents that suffer.

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:So tempted to Slam the USA, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really don't get it, do you?

      It's ok for the US to visit horrors of their own on other countries and cultures, but as soon as they retaliate, you get all "WHY OH WHY can't we all just get along?".

      Shit, your entire post is exemplary of the self-centered attitude your country has.

      Sure, it's horrific when you see civilians caught up in something that didn't directly concern them... but how many Americans broke a sweat over what their government did to innocents in other countries? How many of them cared when the CIA ousted democratically elected leaders in favour of dictators? Just because you didn't SEE any of it, that makes it less horrific and deplorable?

      I tell you, when I saw the headline in the newspaper, with a shot of the towers burning, I laughed, and I feel no remorse. America's only goal is to keep America rich at the expense of all others.

  514. Do you also troll here! by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Wow, get you paid for it?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  515. How stupid.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... but alas, you have never been in a dictatorship. Welcome to the club.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  516. Yes you can, you don;t want... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Did you need to prop up people like Suharto, Mobuto, Noriega, Pinochet, the Sha of Iran and many others while pursuing your global interests?

    No, you could have promoted democracy and accountability and still have friendly regimes.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  517. That is terrible. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I wish some people would consider replacing Ted with Abdul and read this moving remembrance again. Perhaps that would bring home in some trigger happy people the monstrousity of killing blindly.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  518. Unless of course ... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... those to happen to disagree are foreigners, in which case they can be killed or put under the supervision of a suitable dictator...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  519. Disincentive by Scoria · · Score: 2

    Seems like you don't understand the meaning of the words "Freedom of Association". You are still allowed to associate with whoever you want. There's nothing wrong with the government monitoring you while you're doing so - your freedom is not threatened.

    However, it certainly does provide an incentive *not* to exercise your constitutional rights.

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  520. Re:Puleeze! by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

    Well, I would reply that for several centuries those people have been streaming into this region of North America so they CAN have the opportunity to Live without Fear.

    Al-Queda is trying to change that.

    A lot of /.er's have been complaining about the loss of Freedoms due to the US Patriot Act...but what few fail to recognize is that this law is already being sucessfully challenged by the Federal Judiciary!

    I want our Constitutional Rights protected...but when geeks start whinning that the Patriot Act is the single worst result of 9/11, I don't have much patience.

    On the other hand, being forced to move from your childhood home because some cave-dwelling nut-job on the other side of the globe is trying to kill you? I think Homer J said it best:

    Did we lose a war? That's not America. Noooooo. That's not even Mexico.

  521. no, no, look over HERE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all this TV coverage is designed to do two things,
    one: keep us distracted from the destruction of our constitution by the "Civil Rights Terrorists" currently in office in Washington. two: keep the fear alive that it might happen again so that we will be afraid enough to let them take our rights away in order to feel safe.
    "Those who sacrifice personal liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin(echoed later in a speech by Thomas Jefferson.)
    Two people who had recently fought for freedom and risked their lives against a much superior force. I'll go with their judgement on this one. they knew how important it was to be free, we have forgotten. we would rather be safe.
    but their is a price for freedom, a price we seem no longer willing to pay. the world knows that now. they know that if they want to destroy what we stand for, they just have to make us afraid.
    sure we lashed out in anger against those responsible and those around them when we were injured. people who are afraid do that. but unless we stand fast to our beliefs, and do not sacrifice them or change them just to feel safe, then the terrorists accomplished what they really set out to do. they made us afraid to be free.

  522. No by waldoj · · Score: 1

    If you don't have the link, then you are trolling.

    No. I could be wrong. Or I could be right. (It looks like "wrong," according to Snopes.) But merely lacking a link doesn't make me a troll, simply less-than-informative.

    -Waldo Jaquith

  523. Re:Puleeze! by NumberSyx · · Score: 2

    Let me put it like this, you may be willing to throw away your constitutional rights for some vague sense of security, but I am not. The US Patriot Act is the single worst result of 9/11. Lets go over some of the rights this act stripped from me:

    Freedom of association: The government may monitor religious and political groups without evidence of criminal activity.

    Right to liberty: Americans may be jailed without being charged or being able to confront witnesses against them.

    Freedom from unreasonable searches: The government may search and seize Americans' papers and effects without probable cause to aid terrorism investigation.

    Freedom of speech: The government may prosecute librarians, telecommunication company officials and anyone else who reveals they have received a subpoena for records related to the terrorism investigation.

    Right to legal representation: The government may monitor penal communications between attorneys and clients, and deny lawyers to Americans accused of crimes.

    Right to a speedy and public trial: The government may jail Americans indefinitely without a trial.

    Freedom of information: The government has closed once-public immigration hearings, secretly detained hundreds of people without charges, and has encouraged bureaucrats to resist requests for public records under the Freedom of Information Act.

    How can any of this be viewed as a "Good Thing"

    --

    "Our products just aren't engineered for security,"
    -Brian Valentine,VP in charge of MS Windows Development

  524. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

    Did I say I refused to believe it? No I did not. all I said was I would give it more credence if was not simply a parrot. I expect better from the BBC. I'm sure I can find all kinds of "evidence" that says the earth is flat, why do you not believe it?

    --
    between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  525. Re:Puleeze! by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

    I am aware of the results of the US Patriot Act, as they have been posted both on /. and elsewhere. In fact, the current issue of 2600 has a very informative article that outlines the more specific impact of the Act on geeks. So, let me make it clear that I am NOT in favor of it remaining on the books.

    If you want more anti-Patriot Act fodder, you may be interested in this article. It offers real-worldexamples of the impact of the Patriot Act, rather than an enumeration of its theoretical impact, as you provided.

    However, if you bothered to read my previous post, you might have caught one of my points:

    Virtually all laws included in the Patriot Act are in the process of being overturned by the Federal Judiciary. Our country still has a system of checks and balances, and the Justices are working to reverse the power-grabbing initiated by Ashcroft & Co.

    I should add that while I abhor the Patriot Act, I don't have patience for people who are upset because it might be more difficult (or more illegal) to get away with
    - hacking and defacing web sites
    - hoarding child porn
    - evading federal taxes via offshore banking
    - file sharing MP3s
    - trading/selling warez

    If you are upset because you are a Muslim American, or you checked out a book on bomb-making - and as a result the FBI wanted to "interview you" - I am share your outrage.

    However, if you are upset because now the authorities have a better chance of catching you breaking the law - I suddenly find myself considerably less interested in your plight.

    These are all details however. My main point is this:

    When I watched those towers fall live on television, I saw 3,000 people die. What I did not see was"My Liberties Vanish," as some others have posted (aside from, perhaps, Freedom from Fear).

    No, the horrific loss of life and human tragedy in its aftermath is the real story of 9/11. We should be most concerned with making sure that - within the limits of our sacred Constitution - it doesn't happen again.

  526. Re:Just remember where you get your lunch money fr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hoped that we had evolved beyond dolts such as yourself.

    So much for the human race....

  527. Why you sould care by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    Fist of all, I'm glad that you are all right, 3 or 5 guys from my city died that day :-(, I ran to the WC to cry when I heard that one of the towers collapsed, and yes, I believe that the bastards that planned it deserve to die.

    That said, I whas talking about the stuff that THE AMERICAN GOVERMENT AND CORPORATIONS do outside the country. Since America still has a semblance of being a Republic with democratic ellections, the americans, has citizens and shareolders have the duty and the power to force their goverment and corporations to behave in an ethical (Sp?)way, regardless of the country in which they are operating, instead of the double standard that they comonly use.

    If you want a list of american backed/imposet dictators, here it comes:

    Victoriano Huerta, Mexico, 1913-1916. The revolution that ended Porfirio Diaz's dictatorship brougth to power the democratically ellected Francisco I. Madero. The blodly coup d'etat agains Madero whas planned in the american Emmbassy, and Huerta's goverment was inmediately (duh!!) recognized and backed by the american goverment.

    Guatemala, 1956, another coup d'etat against a democratically ellected presidet. his sin? being leftist. Planned by the CIA, in the middle of the Cold War.

    September 11, 1993, Augusto Pinochet seizes power in Chile, backed by gess who? the american goverment, killing the president Allende, and in 1974, doing the first terrorist attack in Washintong DC, killing 2 prominent enemies of his blodly regime.

    More close in time, the USA was almost the only country in the world that recognized the new goverment in Venezuela afther the coup d'etat against the democratically ellected president Hugo Chavez; twisted completelly the ellections in Nicaragua, after the not so veiled menace of drestroying the contry's economy if they voted for Daniel Ortega, who whas a leftist president of Nicaragua in the 80's.

    in the end, it's one thing to fight against the enemy we have at home, an other if we have to fight the American almost unbeatable power too.

    (sorry about the bad grammar, spelling =)

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  528. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually think that they would love the US, provided the radiation didn't sweep into their countries. Here's a couple of ideas (not at all my own)

    1) Find alternative energy sources so we don't need to wage war over oil and also so that we can limit our middle east exposure. Or better yet, and admittedly this is a touch idealistic, teach the American people that they do not NEED to have SUV's!

    2) Take steps to reduce world poverty. There are many other countries responsible for world poverty but nevertheless many actions of the US are not in the favour of third world countries. Rather than making the emphasis of foreign policy on financial gains for america, opening up new markets, new resources, that sort of thing, economic development should be the mandate. If rulers are going to be assasinated, governments taken down, then it should happen for gross mismanagement of government funds, ie corruption. Also, for a small fraction of the defense budget (currently over $300 billion) you could take financial measures to help rebuild some of the poorer economies.

    3) The States should step down there arm sales to foreign countries.

    4) In general, try to see other's perspective and do not always take actions that are beneficial solely to the United States. Ie. The government's refusal of the kyoto agreement, land-mine agreements, breaking of the anti-ballistic missile treaty, issuing threats such as "You are either with us or against us".

  529. 1984ish.... by Rhuiefn · · Score: 1

    Maybe I was the only one who noticed this. Maybe I did not read through 1800+ comments on this already but had anybody watched TV at all Wednesday? Was I the only one that felt that it was shown for a reason other than to "remember?" As I sat there inside Dell, at the cafeteria, they are showing the footage of the WTC and the hysteria on the TV. Now I am not for any movement for or against what happened but I found myself being choked up watching it and then it came to me..... They want us to feel that way. Think about it, one year and we are still "at war." The movement and backing dies away after time, espically since we did not get Osma.....so what do we do? We show the footage all day long so we get back in that good ole american spirit and support George W's views of bombing and invading other nations...

  530. Re:Just remember where you get your lunch money fr by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    For starters, you might use that money to pay for the computer you're using, and the bandwidth you are depriving others of. Not to mention the cloths you're wearing, the food you've eaten today, the education you have and all other worldly possesions

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  531. WTF by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Muslim doesn't represent terrorism to 2/3 of the world, only the US and the Jewish states (oh that includes the US i think).

    Now see your ranting, the reason I chose fight club was because it illustrates that even Americans can see the oppression.

    BTW what would I want with a loan?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:WTF by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2

      Muslim doesn't represent terrorism to 2/3 of the world, only the US and the Jewish states (oh that includes the US i think).

      And New Yorker stock analysts don't represent oppression to 2/3 of the world, only Marxists (speaking of REAL knock on the door in the middle of the night jackbooted, "workers paradise" gulag opression) and Klansmen/Nazi's (ditto) Ever notice how close either extreme really are to each other? Either way the state will MAKE you be what it wants you to be and all your problems are caused by "The international Banking Conspicary" not your own irresponsible decisions or the failings (corruption, oppression, etc) of your own government.

      I won't argue that *some* banks and corporations aren't complicit in oppression around the world but it is governments that are DOING the oppression - gulags, "dissapearances", murders, genocides etc. The argument against those businessmen is NOT generally that the oppress anyone themselves but that they are willing to do business with or aid or seek the aid of those who are. But just as most Arabs are NOT terrorist most businessmen (and certainly most of their employees) are NOT oppresing anyone outside of the fantasies of losers like the KKK (& their islamic equivalent) or other sad little extremists that are upset they are not the ones that get to do the oppressing.

      As for Arabs & Muslims not having a reputation outside of the US and the Jewish states (aside from Israel which other state(s) are jewish?) I think you could find a few Pakistani's Indians Filipinos Indonesians, Susanese, Kenyans & Tanzanians, Germans, Brits, Egyptians, Turks, Swedes, French, Austrians, Romanians, etc. etc. etc. that have fairly sound reasons to disagree with you. The point is not that Muslim==Terrorist but that SOME muslims are and the argument you made that because SOME businessmen (or Muslims) are guilty of oppression (or terrorism) that means ALL businessmen (or Muslims) are guilty and deserve to have a plane flown into their office (or drop bombs on their village). If your argument is collective guilt fine - but it is a two-way street and you have no basis if you adhere to it to protest even *intentional* civillian deaths.

      BTW what would I want with a loan?

      I don't know, I didn't suggets that you did. Just that not getting one, or having to pay it back if you DID get one is not being oppressed. Two contradictory reasons bankers are often accused of "oppressing" people.

  532. Yes Different. by Martin+S. · · Score: 2

    Yes Different, but not for reason you state.

    The fire bombing of Dresden was carried out by RAF Bomber Command, not by the American Air Force and was in retaliation for the Luftwaffe bombing (flattening) of Coventry. Which was carried out in response to previous Bombing by the allies; all the way back until the now known to be accidental (by navigation rrror) bombing (actually dumping) of London in Aug 1940.

    And there lies the difference. These terrorists had no reason to escalate, US Forces conducted no similar actions on Saudi or Afghanistan. Indeed the US aided both these states in the recent past against outside aggression.

  533. Wrong Time Line by Martin+S. · · Score: 2

    Could it be because just as the US goes to war with Germany, Japan convieniently declares war on the US?

    Except this is factually incorrect.

    Japan attacked the US *then* Hitler declared war on the US, not visa-versa; believing Japan had delivered a knockout sucker punch. The US never declared war on either.

  534. BIlly Joel by Triv · · Score: 2

    ANyone here know the Billy Joel song "Miami 2017: Seen the Lights Go Out On Broadway"? For the two weeks following the attack I walked around the city (mostly around 5th ave and 59th - I was working in the GM building) singing that song. It was...cathartic. Sums up my opinion on the whole thing quite nicely. The lyrics are reprinted below without any permission whatsoever.

    Miami 2017 (Seen the Lights Go Out on Broadway)

    I've seen the lights go out on Broadway
    I saw the Empire State laid low.
    And life went on beyond the Palisades,
    They all bought Cadillacs
    And left there long ago.
    We held a concert out in Brooklyn
    To watch the Island bridges blow.
    They turned our power down,
    And drove us underground
    But we went right on with the show


    I've seen the lights go out on Broadway
    I saw the ruins at my feet,
    You know we almost didn't notice it
    We'd see it all the time on Forty-Second Street.

    They burned the churches up in Harlem
    Like in that Spanish Civil War
    The flames were everywhere,
    But no one really cared
    It always burned up there before

    I saw the lights go out on Broadway
    I watched the mighty skyline fall.
    The boats were waiting at the Battery,
    The union went on strike
    They never sailed at all.
    They sent a carrier out from Norfolk
    And picked the Yankees up for free.
    They said that Queens could stay,
    They blew the Bronx away
    And sank Manhattan out to sea

    You know those lights were bright on Broadway
    But that was so many years ago
    Before we all lived here in Florida
    Before the Mafia took over Mexico.
    There are not many who remember
    They say a handful still survive
    To tell the world about the way the lights went out,
    And keep the memory alive

    Triv

  535. kill the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    star

  536. Ummm...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok so how many people in china? + say 1/2 of india
    +Most of the developing countries WIPO
    almost 2/3 of the world....

    They are directly oppressed by drugs patents, and more over by cultural oppression(re musslims)

    I believe that Kenya, Tanzania Turky, Eygipt etc... were all countries that adopted islam (mainly because a muslim cannot hold a muslim as a slave but that kind of oppression is about parrel with Jewish and Christian countries)

    9/10 individuals who get credit are oppressed the second anyone thinks your in finincial difficulty they send you tonnes of advertising through the post tempting you to make your difficulties worse.

    I would never get a loan for morral reasons ,It confuses the hell out of people when I refuse an overdraft or credit, or want to pay bills in advance I don't want the temptation of credit and I refuse it when it's offered.

    1. Re:Ummm...... by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2
      OK lets define our terms:
      oppression
      1. a. The act of oppressing; arbitrary and cruel exercise of power
      They are directly oppressed by drugs patents,

      No they are NOT. Drug patent owners may be acting in an uncompassionate way but they are not OPRESSING anyone. There is no excersice of power, no one is being forced to do anything. Nobody is any worse off than they were before the patent was issued. The people who feel "oppressed" are complaining that someone else doesn't sacrifice to benefit them NOT that anyone is actively working to their detriment. Are you any less guilty than that drug company? Unless you are currently working as a volunteer in a non-profit drug research lab you have made a choice just as the patent holder has NOT to benefit the poor souls in the third world by giving them free drugs. Is your choice better than a for-profit pharmacutical company? The patent holders actions even with their mixed motives will have incredible benefits for many millions of people. Do your actions benefit more than a few hunderd at most? (I am assuming you volunteer the bulk of your time and money to charity since that is the moral standard you demand from other people)

      and more over by cultural oppression (re musslims)

      Again 9/10ths of the "cultural oppression" protested by conservative muslims is not that anyone is using POWER to FORCE their beliefs on them but the fact that others of their own people CHOOSE to adopt western culture - watch TV, eat at McDonalds, Drink Coke etc. Offering the fruits of your culture to someone else is not opression even if that culture is in fact inferior. A Talib using a GUN to FORCE you to make the choice he decides IS!

      I believe that Kenya, Tanzania Turky, Eygipt etc... were all countries that adopted islam

      Well if being given the choice between conversion and death or slavery is "adopting" you are right.

      9/10 individuals who get credit are oppressed

      The only think opressing them is their own stupidity. Being offered a choice even if it is a bad choice and is enticingly offered is not OPRESSION.

      I would never get a loan for morral reasons

      I aplaud your financial wisdom. But you prove my point - You are FREE to make a CHOICE. No one is using POWER to FORCE you to do anything. Try making the same choice to abstain from paying taxes ;) Do you see the difference between tearing up your credit card and ripping up a summons for a tax audit? I am not arguing that the Power used to Force you to pay taxes is oppression because the use of power is not necessarily arbitrary or cruel (though in some countries the power to tax IS used in an arbitrary and/or cruel way and IS oppression)

      Let me clarify my position. In all these cases I am not arguing that western companies & governments are morally pure. They are often guilty of a lack of compassion, dishonesty, and they often encourage people to make poor choices. BUT BEING OFFERED A CHOICE IS NEVER OPPRESSION! Even if it is a bad choice, even if it is a bad choice offered seductively. Having that choice made for you usually IS opression. Being forbidden to own a TV, or eat a burger, or smoke a cigarette is in most cases oppression. Being offered the oppurtunity to do those things is not. YOU may not be happy with the choices your fellow citizens have made. You are probably RIGHT about the wisdom of those choices. BUT if you take it upon yourself to "protect" them from what you (rightly) percieve as their stupidity and act to make the choice for them - YOU are the oppressor!
  537. few more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    star crusher

  538. few more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    star killers

  539. War on -isms and other nebulae by Simplulo · · Score: 1

    >Just like the whole "War on Terrorism" is
    >pointless, so is a war on capitalism.

    Worse, using "war" in such ways (e.g. on Poverty, on Drugs, on Crime, on malaria) blurs the meaning of a word that we should treat with utmost seriousness. Smearing the semantic field confuses our thinking (weak Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis). War justifies extraordinary measures, we are at war against (insert bogeyman here), therefore we can violate (insert lost right here) and otherwise operate without accountability.

    In one of Arthur C. Clark's Rama books, the leaders of one race were required by law to commit suicide at the end of a war that they had declared. I like that idea.

  540. Re:Sep 11 For Me CmdrFool is a festering communist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I woke up early, planning on getting some work done and having lunch with a friend who was visiting from out of town. Ironically, her husband was stationed in Saudi, so she was home visiting her family. I first got a message on IRC from a friend saying a plane hit. Then I heard on Stern that a 2nd tower hit, and posted on Slashdot.
    I felt like a zombie for the next few days. All of Slashdot's team worked together to update stories and struggle against traffic that spiked to 3 times our usual peaks. Spare boxes were stolen for the cause and brought online. Meanwhile we did our best to make sense of what was happening along with everyone else.

    I'm still very proud of how we handled our tiny share of that day and the aftermath. I know that what we did helped some. And I seriously feel honored that I was able to help.

    I've actually been on edge all week knowing that this story was going to be posted on Slashdot. It forced me to reread much of our original coverage. It forced me to relive those frantic first minutes, and the hours, days, and weeks that followed it.

    I hope this story manages to help some others too. It has already helped me.
    --
    Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.


    First off, let me begin by saying that most everyone here doesn't give a fucking shit about what you did on 9/11. Nor does anyone else for that matter. Who gives a fuck? And you come here, now, to pull rank.

    Who cares if your mother's brother's sister's cousin forth friend in law is Stationed in Saudi Arabia. Who fucking cares. Buildings fell in NYC, that doesn't have anything to do with Saudi Arabia. You, on IRC, it figures. You wouldn't happen to be doing ANYTHING to improved things around her or try and refactor that pile of shit you call Slashcode.

    Oh, and a cute little plug for Howard Stern. Are you trying to show the world how cool you are and that you listen to the worlds most infamous shock jock. Let me clue you, Commander Pussy, he jumped the shark when he got divorced.

    Why did you feel like a Zombie? Kathleen not fucking you good and right and putting you to bed? Oh, yeah, you had to struggle to keep those ads spraying in our faces, you bitch fuck. You stole boxes? You stole? From where? And what? Did you take you faggot PC from the gay Jubei piece of shit you are making?

    Proud? How are you proud? And of what? You are such an idiot. You did NOTHING. Nothing was different, better. You and your cabal of shit editors still sucked as hard as usual that day, and your fucking website, which happens to foster lots of socialist and communist assholes, basically bashed the United States to pieces and your shit moderation system allows the angry mob to moderate away any undesired thinking. You want to feel honored? Try on a purple heart, like the one I got, Injured in the line of Duty. You make me sick, you little civvie asshole who thinks he is hot shit with his website allowing socialists and shit-heads like John fucking Katz to drag veterans like me and what we stand for though the fucking mud!

    If your behavior changed at all these last few days, I wouldn't have fucking noticed on iota. You are a absentee leader, you hide like Hussein hides. You rarely speak, and when you do you sound like an Imperial Dictator, with a huge problem, you sound like a simpleton as well. A zealous simpleton.

    Your site is rife with assholes, shit moderation, absentee "leaders," not critical editing, Rumors posted as stories, good storied rejected, and fucking trolls for editors. You people need a dirt nap and a day out of the lime light. No one wants to BE you, we want to rip your fucking ass off the throne and start making this place a good place to stop every day - something you fail at. Now its more fun to troll than to be insightful because of the moronic mob YOU have fucking crafted.

    YOU are anti American, and as one pissed off vet, I feel good that I was injured for my country, and I know good people live here, but pigs like you make it hard sometimes to look at my wounds. It pains me to know how little you understand and how important you think you are.

    DICK.