There may be more economical solutions than hydrogen.
However, hydrogen appeals to me because anyone with water, electricity and some other equipment can get hydrogen. Only people with oil already under their ground can get oil.
If a large opportunity appears for hydrogen makers, they will find more economical ways to bring it to market.
Re:why is Crunch Time even part of the project bud
on
A College Guide to EA
·
· Score: 1
I'm doing little more than guessing, but the game industry probably lives on the deadline. If they have to announce that a game will be late, they might miss the Christmas buying season and terrible things happen to your company stock when the next cash cow is stuck in the stall.
So, they'd rather pay for crunch time than have the game ship late.
Perhaps the companies who are at risk (and others) should join together to just buy SCO (and other such troublesome companies.)
I believe SCO Group's market cap was $170 million when I last looked. A consortium could buy the company and eliminate license issues for less than the cost of litigation.
Slashdot Mirror
There may be more economical solutions than hydrogen. However, hydrogen appeals to me because anyone with water, electricity and some other equipment can get hydrogen. Only people with oil already under their ground can get oil. If a large opportunity appears for hydrogen makers, they will find more economical ways to bring it to market.
I'm doing little more than guessing, but the game industry probably lives on the deadline. If they have to announce that a game will be late, they might miss the Christmas buying season and terrible things happen to your company stock when the next cash cow is stuck in the stall.
So, they'd rather pay for crunch time than have the game ship late.
Perhaps the companies who are at risk (and others) should join together to just buy SCO (and other such troublesome companies.) I believe SCO Group's market cap was $170 million when I last looked. A consortium could buy the company and eliminate license issues for less than the cost of litigation.
Apparently, there is an "Apple Music" at www.applemusic.com. Steve Jobs may have to pay them off too.