Can we just go to diesel at least? How about selling a nice low drag vehicle without the expensive hybrid stuff. I am thinking Prius with Diesel Golf engine.
Why would sustainability become a problem? Aluminum is recycled not lost, so no worries there. A lot of electricity will be needed for that, but that is already true.
Then the only question is what mass of aluminum do they need. Adding more electrical output for aluminum production should not be that bad, since it is a known load and unlikely to vary.
People will from time to time need assistance. To deny that reality is insane. To act as though business will not pollute, abuse workers and in general do anything to save a dollar this quarter is insane.
I have no interest in depriving anyone of their will.
If there were no welfare and you only made $10/day then we as a society have to deal with you living in our parks and on our streets. We have to deal with your inability to afford medical care or housing.
At some point we either subsidize you or let you die on the street.
Making beer requires boiling the wort. That is what makes the sugar rich liquid the yeast can live in. Alcohol in beer is generally too low to be preservative or truly antiseptic.
If you were getting $10 a day, you would still be relying on the government to feed,cloth and shelter you. While at the same time some employer would be benefitting from that government spending.
I don't see how feeding someone is a wasted life. We do not live to make money. We do not live to feed the market.
You act as though people have all these choices. They don't, the reality is many are willing to take any employment they can find. Even if it means damaging their own health. As unemployment increases that only gets worse.
We can look at history and see what happened before. We know that without this regulation workers will be abused.
Without a price floor on labor we had people starving in the street. These laws came about for a reason. If the market was as benevolent as you claim these laws would never have been instated.
Taxing transactions is regressive. I oppose regressive taxes. They are merely a method the rich use to get the middle and poor to pay for things the rich want.
Can we just go to diesel at least?
How about selling a nice low drag vehicle without the expensive hybrid stuff. I am thinking Prius with Diesel Golf engine.
Why would sustainability become a problem?
Aluminum is recycled not lost, so no worries there. A lot of electricity will be needed for that, but that is already true.
I would like to buy these magic Gas Engines you sell, where can I find them?
Does this number include getting the fuel to the ICE you describe?
Tell your local aluminum refiner that.
The GP never mentioned Al though.
Then the only question is what mass of aluminum do they need. Adding more electrical output for aluminum production should not be that bad, since it is a known load and unlikely to vary.
Maybe buy Evora bodies. They are not that far apart.
Why?
If the battery costs less than the equivalent amount of gas it could work.
Aluminum is simple to refine again and can be done without fossil fuels. It uses quite of bit of electricity, but so does recharging a car battery.
Who the hell drives from Boston to Atlanta?
Have you ever heard of an airplane?
If the batteries are no more expensive than 1000 miles worth of gasoline it could still work. I have my doubts about that price though.
They can't.
The Lotus Elise is no more.
Netflix has all of these either on streaming or disc.
No commercials either and way cheaper than cable.
Windows version is going to be x86, so that will run terribly on a smartphone.
Netflix works on linux. Not as great as on windows, but it does work. Wine running firefox and silverlight.
Some public programs are always needed. Welcome to reality.
Even if we limit ourselves to simply those who were injured or born mentally handicapped, someone will always be in need of public programs.
I am not depressed, I am simply facing reality.
People will from time to time need assistance. To deny that reality is insane. To act as though business will not pollute, abuse workers and in general do anything to save a dollar this quarter is insane.
I have no interest in depriving anyone of their will.
So long as there is 1 person in the situation we have to do something.
There are a lot of people who will never get better jobs, who are not really capable of more. Surely, you yourself know of people like this.
If there were no welfare and you only made $10/day then we as a society have to deal with you living in our parks and on our streets. We have to deal with your inability to afford medical care or housing.
At some point we either subsidize you or let you die on the street.
Pasteurization is not what I am speaking of.
Making beer requires boiling the wort. That is what makes the sugar rich liquid the yeast can live in. Alcohol in beer is generally too low to be preservative or truly antiseptic.
Singapore has a social welfare system and most of their housing is public housing.
So that seems to be not what you are touting at all.
So what do you do when your solution is implemented and we do have people starving on the street?
We tried it your way, we had robber barons and the Jungle.
If you were getting $10 a day, you would still be relying on the government to feed,cloth and shelter you. While at the same time some employer would be benefitting from that government spending.
I don't see how feeding someone is a wasted life. We do not live to make money. We do not live to feed the market.
So you have no solutions, just more finger pointing?
The boiling is the real anti-pathogen.
I know I make beer that sometimes has IBUs below 15.
You act as though people have all these choices. They don't, the reality is many are willing to take any employment they can find. Even if it means damaging their own health. As unemployment increases that only gets worse.
We can look at history and see what happened before. We know that without this regulation workers will be abused.
Without a price floor on labor we had people starving in the street. These laws came about for a reason. If the market was as benevolent as you claim these laws would never have been instated.
Taxing transactions is regressive. I oppose regressive taxes. They are merely a method the rich use to get the middle and poor to pay for things the rich want.